Jep 31 2 87

Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 31, Number 2—Spring 2017—Pages 87–106
Machine Learning: An Applied

Econometric Approach
Sendhil Mullainathan and Jann Spiess
M
achines are increasingly doing “intelligent” things: Facebook recognizes
faces in photos, Siri understands voices, and Google translates websites.
The fundamental insight behind these breakthroughs is as much statis-
tical as computational. Machine intelligence became possible once researchers
stopped approaching intelligence tasks procedurally and began tackling them
empirically. Face recognition algorithms, for example, do not consist of hard-wired
rules to scan for certain pixel combinations, based on human understanding of
what constitutes a face. Instead, these algorithms use a large dataset of photos
labeled as having a face or not to estimate a function f (x) that predicts the pres-
ence y of a face from pixels x. This similarity to econometrics raises questions: Are
these algorithms merely applying standard techniques to novel and large datasets?
If there are fundamentally new empirical tools, how do they fit with what we know?
As empirical economists, how can we use them?1
We present a way of thinking about machine learning that gives it its own place
in the econometric toolbox. Central to our understanding is that machine learning
1
In this journal, Varian (2014) provides an excellent introduction to many of the more novel tools
and “tricks” from machine learning, such as decision trees or cross-validation. Einav and Levin (2014)
describe big data and economics more broadly. Belloni, Chernozhukov, and Hanson (2014) present an
econometrically thorough introduction on how LASSO (and close cousins) can be used for inference in
high-dimensional data. Athey (2015) provides a brief overview of how machine learning relates to causal
inference.
■ Sendhil Mullainathan is the Robert C. Waggoner Professor of Economics and Jann Spiess
is a PhD candidate in Economics, both at Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Their email addresses are mullain@fas.harvard.edu and jspiess@fas.harvard.edu.
†
For supplementary materials such as appendices, datasets, and author disclosure statements, see the
article page at
https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.87 doi=10.1257/jep.31.2.87
88 Journal of Economic Perspectives
not only provides new tools, it solves a different problem. Machine learning (or
rather “supervised” machine learning, the focus of this article) revolves around
the problem of prediction: produce predictions of y from x. The appeal of machine
learning is that it manages to uncover generalizable patterns. In fact, the success of
machine learning at intelligence tasks is largely due to its ability to discover complex
structure that was not specified in advance. It manages to fit complex and very flex-
ible functional forms to the data without simply overfitting; it finds functions that
work well out-of-sample.
Many economic applications, instead, revolve around parameter estimation:
produce good estimates of parameters β that underlie the relationship between y
and x. It is important to recognize that machine learning algorithms are not built
for this purpose. For example, even when these algorithms produce regression coef-
ficients, the estimates are rarely consistent. The danger in using these tools is taking
an algorithm built for y  ˆ , and presuming their β 
ˆ have the properties we typically
associate with estimation output. Of course, prediction has a long history in econo-
metric research—machine learning provides new tools to solve this old problem.2
Put succinctly, machine learning belongs in the part of the toolbox marked y  ˆ  rather
than in the more familiar β  ˆ  compartment.
This perspective suggests that applying machine learning to economics requires
finding relevant y  ˆ  tasks. One category of such applications appears when using
new kinds of data for traditional questions; for example, in measuring economic
activity using satellite images or in classifying industries using corporate 10-K filings.
Making sense of complex data such as images and text often involves a prediction
pre-processing step. In another category of applications, the key object of interest
is actually a parameter β, but the inference procedures (often implicitly) contain a
prediction task. For example, the first stage of a linear instrumental variables regres-
sion is effectively prediction. The same is true when estimating heterogeneous
treatment effects, testing for effects on multiple outcomes in experiments, and
flexibly controlling for observed confounders. A final category is in direct policy
applications. Deciding which teacher to hire implicitly involves a prediction task
(what added value will a given teacher have?), one that is intimately tied to the
causal question of the value of an additional teacher.
Machine learning algorithms are now technically easy to use: you can download
convenient packages in R or Python that can fit decision trees, random forests, or
LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) regression coefficients.
This also raises the risk that they are applied naively or their output is misinter-
preted. We hope to make them conceptually easier to use by providing a crisper
2
While the ideas we describe as central to machine learning may appear unfamiliar to some, they
have their roots and parallels in nonparametric statistics, including nonparametric kernel regression,
penalized modeling, cross-validation, and sieve estimation. We refer to Györfi, Kohler, Krzyzak, and
Walk (2002) for a general overview, and to Hansen (2014) more specifically for counterparts in sieve
estimation.
Sendhil Mullainathan and Jann Spiess 89
understanding of how these algorithms work, where they excel, and where they can
stumble—and thus where they can be most usefully applied.3
How Machine Learning Works
Supervised machine learning algorithms seek functions that predict well out
of sample. For example, we might look to predict the value y of a house from its
observed characteristics x based on a sample of n houses (yi, xi). The algorithm
ˆ  that has
would take a loss function L(yˆ ,  y) as an input and search for a function f 
ˆ
low expected prediction loss E(y, x)[L( f   (x), y)] on a new data point from the same
distribution. Even complex intelligence tasks like face detection can be posed this
way. A photo can be turned into a vector, say a 100-by-100 array so that the resulting
x vector has 10,000 entries. The y value is 1 for images with a face and 0 for images
without a face. The loss function L(yˆ ,  y) captures payoffs from proper or improper
classification of “face” or “no face.”
Familiar estimation procedures, such as ordinary least squares, already provide
convenient ways to form predictions, so why look to machine learning to solve
this problem? We will use a concrete application—predicting house prices—to
illustrate these tools. We consider 10,000 randomly selected owner-occupied units
from the 2011 metropolitan sample of the American Housing Survey. In addition
to the values of each unit, we also include 150 variables that contain information
about the unit and its location, such as the number of rooms, the base area, and
the census region within the United States. To compare different prediction tech-
niques, we evaluate how well each approach predicts (log) unit value on a separate
hold-out set of 41,808 units from the same sample. All details on the sample and our
empirical exercise can be found in an online appendix available with this paper at
http://e-jep.org.
Table 1 summarizes the findings of applying various procedures to this
problem. Two main insights arise from this table. First, the table highlights the need
for a hold-out sample to assess performance. In-sample performance may overstate
performance; this is especially true for certain machine learning algorithms like
random forests that have a strong tendency to overfit. Second, on out-of-sample
performance, machine learning algorithms such as random forests can do signif-
icantly better than ordinary least squares, even at moderate sample sizes and
with a limited number of covariates. Understanding machine learning, though,
requires looking deeper than these quantitative gains. To make sense of how these
3
This treatment is by no means exhaustive: First, we focus specifically on “supervised” machine learning
where prediction is central, and do not discuss clustering or other “unsupervised” pattern recognition
techniques. Second, we leave to more specialized sources the more hands-on practical advice, the discus-
sion of computational challenges that are central to a computer-science treatment of the subject, and the
overview of cutting-edge algorithms.
Table 1
Performance of Different Algorithms in Predicting House Values
Prediction performance (R 2) Relative improvement over ordinary least

Training Hold-out squares by quintile of house value
Method sample sample 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
Ordinary least 47.3% 41.7% -- -- -- -- --
squares [39.7%, 43.7%]
Regression tree 39.6% 34.5% −11.5% 10.8% 6.4% −14.6% −31.8%
tuned by depth [32.6%, 36.5%]
LASSO 46.0% 43.3% 1.3% 11.9% 13.1% 10.1% −1.9%
[41.5%, 45.2%]
Random forest 85.1% 45.5% 3.5% 23.6% 27.0% 17.8% −0.5%
[43.6%, 47.5%]
Ensemble 80.4% 45.9% 4.5% 16.0% 17.9% 14.2% 7.6%
[44.0%, 47.9%]
Note: The dependent variable is the log-dollar house value of owner-occupied units in the 2011
American Housing Survey from 150 covariates including unit characteristics and quality measures.
All algorithms are fitted on the same, randomly drawn training sample of 10,000 units and
evaluated on the 41,808 remaining held-out units. The numbers in brackets in the hold-out sample
column are 95 percent bootstrap confidence intervals for hold-out prediction performance, and
represent measurement variation for a fixed prediction function. For this illustration, we do not
use sampling weights. Details are provided in the online Appendix at http://e-jep.org.
procedures work, we will focus in depth on a comparison of ordinary least squares

and regression trees.
From Linear Least-Squares to Regression Trees

Applying ordinary least squares to this problem requires making some choices.
For the ordinary least squares regression reported in the first row of Table 1, we
included all of the main effects (with categorical variables as dummies). But why not
include interactions between variables? The effect of the number of bedrooms may
well depend on the base area of the unit, and the added value of a fireplace may be
different depending on the number of living rooms. Simply including all pairwise
interactions would be infeasible as it produces more regressors than data points
(especially considering that some variables are categorical). We would therefore
need to hand-curate which interactions to include in the regression. An extreme
version of this challenge appears in the face-recognition problem. The functions
that effectively combine pixels to predict faces will be highly nonlinear and inter-
active: for example, “noses” are only defined by complex interactions between
numerous pixels.
Machine learning searches for these interactions automatically. Consider, for
example, a typical machine learning function class: regression trees. Like a linear
function, a regression tree maps each vector of house characteristics to a predicted
Machine Learning: An Applied Econometric Approach 91
Figure 1
A Shallow Regression Tree Predicting House Values
Yes Type = 2,3,7 No
Baths < 1.5 Baths < 1.5
Rooms < 4.5 UNITSF < 1,122.5 Rooms < 6.5 Baths < 2.5
9.2 9.8 9.8 10.5 11.6 11.9 12.2 12.8
Note: Based on a sample from the 2011 American Housing Survey metropolitan survey. House-
value predictions are in log dollars.
value. The prediction function takes the form of a tree that splits in two at every
node. At each node of the tree, the value of a single variable (say, number of bath-
rooms) determines whether the left (less than two bathrooms) or the right (two or
more) child node is considered next. When a terminal node—a leaf—is reached, a
prediction is returned. An example of a tree is given in Figure 1. We could represent
the tree in Figure 1 as a linear function, where each of the leaves corresponds to
a product of dummy variables (x1 = 1TYPE=2,3,7 × 1BATHS<1.5 × 1ROOMS<4.5 for the left-
most leaf) with the corresponding coefficient (α1 = 9.2). Trees are thus a highly
interactive function class.
The Secret Sauce

How can a tree even be fitted here? A deep enough tree would fit perfectly—
each observation would end up in its own leaf. That tree will have perfect fit, but of
course this is really perfect overfit: out of sample, this tree would perform terribly
for prediction. The (over)fitting conundrum is not specific to trees. The very appeal
of machine learning is high dimensionality: flexible functional forms allow us to fit
varied structures of the data. But this flexibility also gives so many possibilities that
simply picking the function that fits best in-sample will be a terrible choice. So how
does machine learning manage to do out-of-sample prediction?
The first part of the solution is regularization. In the tree case, instead of
choosing the “best” overall tree, we could choose the best tree among those of a
certain depth. The shallower the tree, the worse the in-sample fit: with many obser-
vations in each leaf, no one observation will be fit very well. But this also means
there will be less overfit: the idiosyncratic noise of each observation is averaged
out. Tree depth is an example of a regularizer. It measures the complexity of a
function. As we regularize less, we do a better job at approximating the in-sample
variation, but for the same reason, the wedge between in-sample and out-of-sample
fit will typically increase. Machine learning algorithms typically have a regularizer
associated with them. By choosing the level of regularization appropriately, we can
have some benefits of flexible functional forms without having those benefits be
overwhelmed by overfit.
How do we choose the optimal depth of the tree? In machine learning terms,
how do we choose the level of regularization (“tune the algorithm”)? This is the
second key insight: empirical tuning. The essential problem of overfitting is that we
would like the prediction function to do well out of sample, but we only fit in-sample. In
empirical tuning, we create an out-of-sample experiment inside the original sample.
We fit on one part of the data and ask which level of regularization leads to the best
performance on the other part of the data.4 We can increase the efficiency of this
procedure through cross-validation: we randomly partition the sample into equally
sized subsamples (“folds”). The estimation process then involves successively holding
out one of the folds for evaluation while fitting the prediction function for a range
of regularization parameters on all remaining folds. Finally, we pick the parameter
with the best estimated average performance.5 The second row of Table 1 shows the
performance of a regression tree where we have chosen depth in this way.
This procedure works because prediction quality is observable: both predic-
tions yˆ  and outcomes y are observed. Contrast this with parameter estimation, where
typically we must rely on assumptions about the data-generating process to ensure
consistency. Observability by itself would not make prediction much easier since the
algorithm would still need to sort through a very large function class. But regular-
ization turns this choice into a low-dimensional one—we only need to choose the
best tuning parameter. Regularization combines with the observability of predic-
tion quality to allow us to fit flexible functional forms and still find generalizable
structure.
Most of Machine Learning in One Expression 6

This structure—regularization and empirical choice of tuning parameters—
helps organize the sometimes bewildering variety of prediction algorithms that one
encounters. There is a function class  (in this case, trees) and a regularizer R( f )
(in the specific example, depth of tree) that expresses the complexity of a function
4
One approach to the tuning problem is deriving the optimal level of regularization analytically for each
procedure and under assumptions on the sampling process, such as AIC (Akaike Information Criterion),
BIC (Bayesian Information Criterion), and SURE (Stein’s Unbiased Risk Estimate). This theoretical
guidance is helpful when available and applicable, but assumptions may prove hard to verify as the
reason for undertaking nonparametric analysis may be that we are unsure about features of the data-
generating processes in the first place. In other cases, theoretical results give only asymptotic guidance
that remain an unverifiable promise in finite samples.
5
In some cases, the researcher will adjust the empirical loss minimizer to account for measurement
error and/or sample size differences in mapping observed performance to the level of regularization.
An example is the “one standard-error rule” for LASSO tuning discussed in Hastie, Tibshirani, and
Friedman (2009).
6
We adapted the title of this section from a post on Francis X. Diebold’s “No Hesitations” blog, http://
fxdiebold.blogspot.com/2017/01/all-of-machine-learning-in-one.html.
Table 2
Some Machine Learning Algorithms
Function class  (and its parametrization) Regularizer R( f )
Global/parametric predictors
Linear β′x(and generalizations) Subset selection| | β| |  0 = ∑ kj = 1
     1  β  j ≠0
LASSO | | β| |  1 = ∑ kj = 1
    | β  j |
Ridge | | β| |  2  2 =
∑ kj = 1
    β  j  2
Elastic net α | | β| |  1 + (1 − α) | | β| |  2   2
Local/nonparametric predictors
Decision/regression trees Depth, number of nodes/leaves, minimal leaf
size, information gain at splits
Random forest (linear combination of Number of trees, number of variables used
trees) in each tree, size of bootstrap sample,
complexity of trees (see above)
Nearest neighbors Number of neighbors
Kernel regression Kernel bandwidth
Mixed predictors
Deep learning, neural nets, convolutional Number of levels, number of neurons per
neural networks level, connectivity between neurons
Splines Number of knots, order
Combined predictors
Bagging: unweighted average of predictors Number of draws, size of bootstrap samples
from bootstrap draws (and individual regularization parameters)
Boosting: linear combination of Learning rate, number of iterations (and
predictions of residual individual regularization parameters)
Ensemble: weighted combination of Ensemble weights (and individual
different predictors regularization parameters)
(more precisely the complexity of its representation).7 Picking the prediction func-
tion then involves two steps: The first step is, conditional on a level of complexity,
to pick the best in-sample loss-minimizing function.8 The second step is to estimate
the optimal level of complexity using empirical tuning (as we saw in cross-validating
the depth of the tree). In Table 2, we give an incomplete overview of methods that
follow this pattern.
7
We write the regularizer as a mapping from the function itself. In cases where functions are not uniquely
parametrized (and for practical purposes in many applications), we implicitly refer to a set of parameters
that define a function for a given parametrization of the function class. Also, the complexity itself may
be estimated from the training data.
8
We summarize this central step in the expression
function class
 
minimize ∑  

 i=1
n
   L( f (x
  i), y  , 
i  over f ∈ F 
 
    subject to    R( f ) ≤ c 
  .
 
   
in-sample loss complexity restriction
For example, in our framework, the LASSO (probably the machine learning
tool most familiar to economists) corresponds to 1) a quadratic loss function, 2) a
class of linear functions (over some fixed set of possible variables), and 3) a regular-
izer which is the sum of absolute values of coefficients.9 This effectively results in a
linear regression in which only a small number of predictors from all possible vari-
ables are chosen to have nonzero values: the absolute-value regularizer encourages
a coefficient vector where many are exactly zero. The third row of Table 1 shows
the performance of LASSO in predicting house prices. Ridge regression is a close
cousin: it simply uses a quadratic regularizer instead of the sum of absolute values.
In some of the most successful machine learning methods, multiple predictors
from the same function class are combined into a single prediction function and
tuned jointly. The fourth row in Table 1 shows the performance of a random forest;
it outperforms ordinary least squares on the hold-out by over 9 percent in terms of
overall R 2. The random forest is an average over many (in this case, 700) trees. Each
tree is fitted on a bootstrap sample of the original training set and constrained to
a randomly chosen subset of variables. The predictions of the trees are then aver-
aged. The regularization variables in this algorithm include the complexity of each
individual tree (such as its depth), the number of variables used in each tree, the
size of each bootstrap sample, and the number of trees.
The last row in Table 1 lists an ensemble method that runs several separate
algorithms (in this case tree, LASSO, and forest) and then averages their predic-
tions, with weights chosen by cross-validation. The fact that the ensemble comes out
on top in Table 1—with an out-of-sample R 2 of almost 46 percent—is no isolated
case. While it may be unsurprising that such ensembles perform well on average—
after all, they can cover a wider array of functional forms—it may be more surprising
that they come on top in virtually every prediction competition.
Other models that we have not estimated in our data also fit this framework.
For example, neural nets are popular prediction algorithms for image recogni-
tion tasks. For one standard implementation in binary prediction, the underlying
function class is that of nested logistic regressions: The final prediction is a logistic
transformation of a linear combination of variables (“neurons”) that are themselves
such logistic transformations, creating a layered hierarchy of logit regressions. The
complexity of these functions is controlled by the number of layers, the number of
neurons per layer, and their connectivity (that is, how many variables from one level
enter each logistic regression on the next).
Econometric Guidance
Viewed this way, there are several choices to be made when using a machine
learning approach. First, this approach involves choosing the functions we fit and
how we regularize them: Should I use a regression tree or linear functions? If I
choose a tree, do I express its complexity by its depth, the minimal number of units
9
For some readers, a more familiar equation for the LASSO is the Lagrangian dual formulation, where
the Lagrange multiplier λ plays the role of the tuning parameter.
in each leaf, or the minimal improvement in prediction quality at every split? Avail-
able guidance in the machine learning literature is largely based on a combination
of simulation studies and expert intuition. They are complemented by recent theo-
retical results in econometrics that shed light on the comparative performance of
different regularizers, such as Abadie and Kasy (2017) for LASSO and close relatives.
Practically, one must decide how to encode and transform the underlying vari-
ables. In our example of house prices, do we include base area per room as a variable,
or just total area? Should we use logarithmic scales? Normalize to unit variances?
These choices about how to represent the features will interact with the regularizer
and function class: A linear model can reproduce the log base area per room from
log base area and log room number easily, while a regression tree would require
many splits to do so. In a traditional estimator, replacing one set of variables by a set
of transformed variables from which it could be reconstructed would not change the
predictions, because the set of functions being chosen from has not changed. But
with regularization, including these variables can improve predictions because—at
any given level of regularization—the set of functions might change. If the number
of bathrooms per bedroom is what we suspect will matter in the price-setting process,
creating that variable explicitly lowers the complexity cost for including this vari-
able. Economic theory and content expertise play a crucial role in guiding where
the algorithm looks for structure first. This is the sense in which “simply throw it
all in” is an unreasonable way to understand or run these machine learning algo-
rithms. For example, in visual tasks, some understanding of geometry proves crucial
in specifying the way in which neurons are connected within neural nets.
A final set of choices revolves around the tuning procedure: Should out-of-
sample performance be estimated using some known correction for overfitting
(such as an adjusted R 2 when it is available) or using cross-validation? How many
folds should be used in cross-validation, and how exactly should the final tuning
parameter be chosen? While asymptotic results show that cross-validation tuning
approximates the optimal complexity (Vaart, Dudoit, and Laan 2006), available
finite-sample guidance on its implementation—such as heuristics for the number
of folds (usually five to ten) or the “one standard-error rule” for tuning the LASSO
(Hastie, Tibshirani, and Friedman 2009)—has a more ad-hoc flavor. Design choices
must be made about function classes, regularizers, feature representations, and
tuning procedures: there are no definitive and universal answers available. This
leaves many opportunities for econometric research.
Quantifying Predictive Performance

While these design choices leave plenty of freedom, having a reliable estimate
of predictive performance is a nonnegotiable requirement for which strong econo-
metric guarantees are available. In the house-price example, we divide the sample
into a training and a test (hold-out) sample. This implements a firewall principle:
none of the data involved in fitting the prediction function—which includes cross-
validation to tune the algorithm—is used to evaluate the prediction function that
is produced. As a result, inference on predictive performance of a fixed predictive
function is a straightforward task of mean estimation: the distribution of realized

loss in the hold-out (taking any clustering into account) directly yield consistent
estimates of performance and confidence intervals.
Econometric theory plays a dual role here. First, econometrics can guide
design choices, such as the number of folds or the function class. Guidance in these
choices can help improve prediction quality and the power of any test based on it.
Second, given the fitted prediction function, it must enable us to make inferences
about estimated fit. The hold-out sample exactly allows us to form properly sized
tests about predictive properties of the fitted function.
What Do We (Not) Learn from Machine Learning Output?

It is tempting to do more with the fitted function. Why not also use it to learn
something about the “underlying model”: specifically, why not use it to make infer-
ences about the underlying data-generating process? Even if correlations are not
causal, might they not reveal useful underlying structure? The LASSO regression
of Table 1 ends up not using the number of dining rooms as a right-hand variable.
Does that reveal that the number of dining rooms is an unimportant variable in
determining house prices (given the other available variables)? It is tempting to
draw such conclusions, and such conclusions could be economically meaningful:
for example, in predicting wages, the weight placed on race by a machine learning
algorithm seems like it could be a proxy for discrimination. Statistical packages
contribute to these inferences by outputting measures of variable importance in the
fitted functions.
One obvious problem that arises in making such inferences is the lack of stan-
dard errors on the coefficients. Even when machine-learning predictors produce
familiar output like linear functions, forming these standard errors can be more
complicated than seems at first glance as they would have to account for the model
selection itself. In fact, Leeb and Pötscher (2006, 2008) develop conditions under
which it is impossible to obtain (uniformly) consistent estimates of the distribution
of model parameters after data-driven selection.
But there is an even bigger challenge. To illustrate the problem, we repeated
the house-value prediction exercise on subsets of our sample from the American
Housing Survey. First, we randomly cut the sample into ten partitions of approxi-
mately 5,000 units each. On each partition, we re-estimate the LASSO predictor.
Through its regularizer, LASSO produces a sparse prediction function, so that many
coefficients are zero and are “not used”—in this example, we find that more than
half the variables are unused in each run.
Figure 2 shows how the variables that are used vary from partition to partition.
Each row represents one of x variables used. Each column represents a different
partition. We color each cell black if that variable is used by the LASSO model in
that partition. Figure 2 documents a fundamental problem: a variable used in one
partition may be unused in another. In fact, there are few stable patterns overall.
These instabilities do not reflect instability in prediction quality—in fact, the R 2
remains roughly constant from partition to partition. The problem arises because if
Figure 2
Selected Coefficients (Nonzero Estimates) across Ten LASSO Regressions
Parameter in the linear model
Estimate
Zero
Nonzero
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Fold of the sample
Note: We repeated the house-value prediction exercise on subsets of our sample from the American
Housing Survey. First, we randomly cut the sample into ten partitions of approximately 5,000
units each. On each partition, we re-estimate the LASSO predictor, with LASSO regularization
parameter fixed. The figure shows how the variables that are used vary from partition to partition.
Each row represents one of x variables used. Each column represents a different partition. We
color each cell black if that variable is used by the LASSO model (has a nonzero coefficient) in
that partition. The figure documents a fundamental problem: a variable used in one partition may
be unused in another. In fact, there are few stable patterns overall. For details, see discussion in
text and online appendix available with this paper at http://e-jep.org.
the variables are correlated with each other (say the number of rooms of a house and
its square-footage), then such variables are substitutes in predicting house prices.
Similar predictions can be produced using very different variables. Which variables
are actually chosen depends on the specific finite sample. In traditional estimation,
correlations between observed variables would be reflected in large standard errors
that express our uncertainty in attributing effects to one variable over the other.
This problem is ubiquitous in machine learning. The very appeal of these algo-
rithms is that they can fit many different functions. But this creates an Achilles’
heel: more functions mean a greater chance that two functions with very different
coefficients can produce similar prediction quality. As a result, how an algorithm

chooses between two very different functions can effectively come down to the flip
of a coin. In econometric terms, while the lack of standard errors illustrates the limi-
tations to making inference after model selection, the challenge here is (uniform)
model selection consistency itself.
Regularization also contributes to the problem. First, it encourages the choice
of less complex, but wrong models. Even if the best model uses interactions of
number of bathrooms with number of rooms, regularization may lead to a choice
of a simpler (but worse) model that uses only number of fireplaces. Second, it can
bring with it a cousin of omitted variable bias, where we are typically concerned with
correlations between observed variables and unobserved ones. Here, when regular-
ization excludes some variables, even a correlation between observed variables and
other observed (but excluded) ones can create bias in the estimated coefficients.
Recovering Structure: Estimation (β  ˆ ) vs Prediction ( y 

ˆ )
We face a challenge. On the one hand, these machine learning algorithms by
their very construction—tuning and evaluation out of sample—seek a generaliz-
able structure and are evaluated on their capacity to find it. These algorithms do
ˆ : when predictive quality is high, some structure must have been
detect structure in y 
found. Some econometric results also show the converse: when there is structure,
it will be recovered at least asymptotically (for example, for prediction consistency
of LASSO-type estimators in an approximately sparse linear framework, see Belloni,
Chernozhukov, and Hansen 2011). On the other hand, we have seen the dangers of
naively interpreting the estimated β ˆ parameters as indicating the discovered structure.
Of course, assumptions about the data-generating process would allow us to
take the estimated β ˆ parameters more literally. The discussion above suggests that
we must limit the correlations between the observed variables. This is seen clearly
in Zhao and Yu (2006) who establish asymptotic model-selection consistency for the
LASSO. Besides assuming that the true model is “sparse”—only a few variables are
relevant—they also require the “irrepresentable condition” between observables:
loosely put, none of the irrelevant covariates can be even moderately related to the
set of relevant ones.
In practice, these assumptions are strong. The instability in Figure 2, for example,
suggests that they are not realistic in the house price example. But since we know this
model is finding some structure, can we characterize it? A key area of future research
in econometrics and machine learning is to make sense of the estimated prediction
function without making strong assumptions about the underlying true world.
How Machine Learning Can Be Applied
Our starting point for applications of machine learning algorithms is guided

by both the strength of machine learning—it provides a powerful, flexible way of
making quality predictions—and its weakness: absent strong and mostly unverifiable
assumptions, machine learning does not produce stable estimates of the underlying
ˆ  problems, places where improved prediction
parameters. Therefore, we look for y 
has large applied value.
New Data
The phrase “big data” emphasizes a change in the scale of data. But there has
been an equally important change in the nature of this data. Machine learning can
deal with unconventional data that is too high-dimensional for standard estimation
methods, including image and language information that we conventionally had
not even thought of as data we can work with, let alone include in a regression.
Satellites have been taking images of the earth for decades, which we can now
use not just as pixelated vectors, but as economically meaningful input. Donaldson
and Storeygard (in this journal, 2016) provide an overview of the growing litera-
ture in economics using satellite data, including how luminosity at night correlates
with economic output (Henderson, Storeygard, and Weil 2012) or estimating future
harvest size (Lobell 2013). Satellite images do not directly contain, for example,
measures of crop yield. Instead, they provide us with a large x vector of image-based
data; these images are then matched (in what we hope is a representative sample)
to yield data which form the y variable. This translation of satellite images to yield
measures is a prediction problem. Machine learning is the essential tool by which
we extract and scale economically meaningful signals from this data.
These new sources of data are particularly relevant where reliable data on
economic outcomes are missing, such as in tracking and targeting poverty in devel-
oping countries (Blumenstock 2016). Jean et al. (2016) train a neural net to predict
local economic outcomes from satellite data in five African countries. Machine
learning also yields economic predictions from large-scale network data; for
example, Blumenstock, Cadamuro, and On (2015) use cell-phone data to measure
wealth, allowing them to quantify poverty in Rwanda at the individual level. Image
recognition can of course be used beyond satellite data, and localized prediction
of economic outcomes is relevant beyond the developing world: as one example,
Glaeser, Kominers, Luca, and Naik (2016) use images from Google Street View to
measure block-level income in New York City and Boston.
Language provides another new powerful source of data. As with satellite
images, online posts can be made meaningful by labeling them with machine
learning. Kang, Kuznetsova, Luca, and Choi (2013) use restaurant reviews on
Yelp.com to predict the outcome of hygiene inspections. Antweiler and Frank
(2004) classify text on online financial message boards as bullish, bearish, or neither.
Their algorithm trains on a small number of manual classifications, and scales these
labels up to 1.5 million messages as a basis for the subsequent analysis, which shows
that online messages help explain market volatility, with statistically significant, if
economically modest, effects on stock returns.
Financial economists rely heavily on corporate financial information, such
as that available in Compustat. But companies release detailed reports on their
financial positions above and beyond these numbers. In the United States, publicly
traded companies must file annual 10-K forms. Kogan, Levin, Routledge, Sagi, and
Smith (2009) predict volatility of roughly 10,000 such firms from market-risk disclo-
sure text within these forms, and show that it adds significant predictive information
to past volatility. Hoberg and Phillips (2016) extract similarity of firms from their
10-K business description texts, generating new time-varying industry classifications
for these firms.
Machine learning can be useful in preprocessing and imputing even in tradi-
tional datasets. In this vein, Feigenbaum (2015a, b) applies machine-learning
classifiers to match individuals in historical records: he links fathers and sons across
censuses and other data sources, which allows him to quantify social mobility during
the Great Depression. Bernheim, Bjorkegren, Naecker, and Rangel (2013) link
survey responses to observable behavior: A subset of survey respondents take part in
a laboratory experiment; a machine learning algorithm trained on this data predicts
actual choices from survey responses, giving economists a tool to infer actual from
reported behavior.
Prediction in the Service of Estimation

A second category of application is in tasks that we approach as estimation
problems. Even when we are interested in a parameter β  ˆ , the tool we use to recover
that parameter may contain (often implicitly) a prediction component. Take the
case of linear instrumental variables understood as a two-stage procedure: first
regress x = γ′z + δ on the instrument z, then regress y = β′x + ϵ on the fitted values
ˆ . The first stage is typically handled as an estimation step. But this is effectively a
x 
prediction task: only the predictions x  ˆ  enter the second stage; the coefficients in the
first stage are merely a means to these fitted values.
Understood this way, the finite-sample biases in instrumental variables are a
consequence of overfitting. Overfitting means that the in-sample fitted values x  ˆ  pick
up not only the signal γ′z, but also the noise δ. As a consequence, x  ˆ  is biased towards
x, and the second-stage instrumental variable estimate β  ˆ is thus biased towards the
ordinary least squares estimate of y on x. Since overfit will be larger when sample
size is low, the number of instruments is high, or the instruments are weak, we can
see why biases arise in these cases (Bound, Jaeger, and Baker 1995; Bekker 1994;
Staiger and Stock 1997).
This analogy carries through to some of the classical solutions to finite-sample
bias. Above, we used hold-out sets (in evaluating the prediction function) or cross-
validation (in choosing the tuning parameter) to separate the data used in the fitting
of the function from the data used in the forming of predicted values; this ensured,
for example, that our evaluations of a function’s prediction quality were unbiased.
These same techniques applied here result in split-sample instrumental variables
(Angrist and Krueger 1995) and “jackknife” instrumental variables (Angrist,
Imbens, and Krueger 1999). Overfitting has wider consequences: the flipside of
excessive in-sample overfitting is bad out-of-sample prediction. In fact, predicting
well requires managing overfitting, which was the goal of both regularization and
empirical tuning. These techniques are applicable to the first stage of instrumental
variable analysis as well. In particular, a set of papers has already introduced regu-
larization into the first stage in a high-dimensional setting, including the LASSO
(Belloni, Chen, Chernozhukov, and Hansen 2012) and ridge regression (Carrasco
2012; Hansen and Kozbur 2014). More recent extensions include nonlinear func-
tional forms, all the way to neural nets (Hartford, Leyton-Brown, and Taddy 2016).
Practically, even when there appears to be only a few instruments, the problem
is effectively high-dimensional because there are many degrees of freedom in how
instruments are actually constructed. For example, several papers use college prox-
imity as an instrument in estimating returns to schooling (for example, Card 1999,
Table 4). How exactly college proximity is used, however, varies. After all, it can be
included linearly, logarithmically, or as dummies (and if so, with different thresh-
olds) and can be interacted with other variables (such as demographic groups most
likely to be affected). The latitude in making these choices makes it even more valu-
able to consider the first stage as a prediction problem. It allows us to let the data
explicitly pick effective specifications, and thus allows us to recover more of the vari-
ation and construct stronger instruments, provided that predictions are constructed
and used in a way that preserves the exclusion restriction.10
Many other inference tasks also have a prediction problem implicit inside
them. In controlling for observed confounders, we do not care about the param-
eters associated with the control variables as an end in themselves. For example,
Lee, Lessler, and Stuart (2010) use machine-learning algorithms to estimate the
propensity score. Chernozhukov, Chetverikov, Demirer, Duflo, Hansen, and Newey
(2016) take care of high-dimensional controls in treatment effect estimation by
solving two simultaneous prediction problems, one in the outcome and one in the
treatment equation.
Similar opportunities arise even in cases where we have experimental data.
Consider the problem of verifying balance between treatment and control groups
(such as when there is attrition). Or consider the seemingly different problem of
testing for effects on many outcomes. Both can be viewed as prediction problems
(Ludwig, Mullainathan, and Spiess 2017). If treatment assignment can be predicted
better than chance from pretreatment covariates, this is a sign of imbalance. If treat-
ment assignment can be predicted from a set of outcomes, the treatment must have
had an effect. Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects can also be viewed as
a prediction problem, though the parallel is nonobvious and implementing the
transformation is a major contribution of the papers in this literature. Typically,
heterogeneous treatment effects might be estimated as coefficients on interac-
tion terms in a linear regression. Consider instead the prediction task of mapping
unit-level attributes to individual effect estimates. Of course, individual-level treat-
ment effects are not directly observed. Despite this, machine-learning methods
have been successfully applied to map out treatment effect heterogeneity. Athey
and Imbens (2016) use sample-splitting to obtain valid (conditional) inference on
10
In particular, we have to avoid “forbidden regressions” (Angrist and Pischke 2008) in which correla-
tion between first-stage residuals and fitted values exists and creates bias in the second stage.
treatment effects that are estimated using decision trees, as previously suggested
by Imai and Strauss (2011). Wager and Athey (2015) extend the construction to
random forests, while Grimmer, Messing, and Westwood (2016) employ ensemble
methods. These heterogenous treatment effects can be used to assign treatments;
Misra and Dubé (2016) illustrate this on the problem of price targeting, applying
Bayesian regularized methods to a large-scale experiment where prices were
randomly assigned.
Expressing parts of these inference tasks as prediction problems also makes
clear the limitation on their output. A carefully constructed heterogeneity tree
provides valid estimates of treatment effects in every leaf (Athey and Imbens 2016).
At the same time, one must be careful in interpreting the particular representation
of the chosen tree, as it may suffer from instabilities similar to those in the American
Housing Survey data above. Suppose the algorithm chooses a tree that splits on
education but not on age. Conditional on this tree, the estimated coefficients are
consistent. But that does not imply that treatment effects do not also vary by age,
as education may well covary with age; on other draws of the data, in fact, the same
procedure could have chosen a tree that split on age instead.
Prediction in Policy
Consider the following policy problem: Shortly after arrest, a judge must
decide where defendants will wait for trial, at home or in jail. This decision, by law,
must be based on a prediction by the judge: If released, will the defendant return
for their court appearance or will they skip court, and will they potentially commit
further crimes? Statistical tools have helped improve policies in several ways (such
as randomized control trials helping to answer “does the policy work?”). In this case,
one might wonder whether a predictive algorithm could similarly help improve the
judge’s decision (Kleinberg et al. 2017).
Prediction policy problems, such as the bail problem, appear in many areas
(Kleinberg, Ludwig, Mullainathan, and Obermeyer 2015). For instance, a large
literature estimates the impact of hiring an additional teacher—this is meant to
inform the decision of whether to hire more teachers. The decision of which teacher
to hire, however, requires a prediction: the use of information available at time of
hiring to forecast individual teacher quality (Kane and Staiger 2008; Dobbie 2011;
Jacob et al. 2016). Chalfin et al. (2016) provide some preliminary evidence of how
machine learning may improve predictive accuracy in these and other personnel
decisions. Chandler, Levitt, and List (2011) predict highest-risk youth so that
mentoring interventions can be appropriately targeted. Abelson, Varshney, and Sun
(2014), McBride and Nichols (2016), and Engstrom, Hersh, and Newhouse (2016)
use machine learning to improve poverty targeting relative to existing poverty score-
cards. These predictive problems intimately relate to questions we already seek to
answer: the impact of an extra teacher depends on how that teacher is chosen; the
impact of a transfer program depends on how well targeted it is. Given the active
research contributing to these policy discussions, expanding the focus to these adja-
cent prediction questions seems promising.
Economists can play a crucial role in solving prediction policy problems. First,
even though prediction is important, machine learning is not enough: familiar
econometric challenges arise. In deciding whether an algorithm could improve on
the judge, one must resolve a basic counterfactual issue: we only know the crimes
committed by those released. Many predictions problems share the feature that
the available data is dictated by existing decision rules, and insights from the causal
inference could prove helpful in tackling these problems; for example, Kleinberg
et al. (2017) use pseudo-random assignment to judges of differing leniency in their
application. Second, behavioral issues arise. Even when an algorithm can help, we
must understand the factors that determine adoption of these tools (Dawes, Faust,
and Meehl 1989; Dietvorst, Simmons, and Massey 2015; Yeomans, Shah, Mullaina-
than, and Kleinberg 2016). What factors determine faith in the algorithm? Would
a simpler algorithm be more believed? How do we encourage judges to use their
private information optimally? These questions combine problems of technology
diffusion, information economics, and behavioral economics.
Testing Theories
A final application of supervised machine learning is to test directly theories that
are inherently about predictability. Within the efficient markets theory in finance, for
example, the inability to make predictions about the future is a key prediction. Moritz
and Zimmermann (2016) adapt methods from machine learning to show that past
returns of US firms do have significant predictive power over their future stock prices.
Machine learning can also be used to construct a benchmark for how well theo-
ries are performing. A common concern is that even if a theory is accurate, it may
only clear up a little of the systematic variation it aims to explain. The R 2 alone does
not address this question, as some of the total variance may not be explainable from
what is measured. Kleinberg, Liang, and Mullainathan (2015) propose to compare
the predictive power of a theory to that of an optimal predictor. Relatedly, Peysak-
hovich and Naecker (2015) compare the out-of-sample performance of behavioral
economics models for choices under risk and ambiguity to an atheoretical machine-
learning benchmark.
Conclusion
The problem of artificial intelligence has vexed researchers for decades. Even
simple tasks such as digit recognition—challenges that we as humans overcome so
effortlessly—proved extremely difficult to program. Introspection into how our
mind solves these problems failed to translate into procedures. The real break-
through came once we stopped trying to deduce these rules. Instead, the problem
was turned into an inductive one: rather than hand-curating the rules, we simply let
the data tell us which rules work best.
For empiricists, these theory- and data-driven modes of analysis have always
coexisted. Many estimation approaches have been (often by necessity) based on
top-down, theory-driven, deductive reasoning. At the same time, other approaches

have aimed to simply let the data speak. Machine learning provides a powerful tool
to hear, more clearly than ever, what the data have to say.
These approaches need not be in conflict. A structural model of poverty, for
example, could be applied to satellite image data processed using machine learning.
Theory could guide what variables to manipulate in an experiment; but in analyzing
the results, machine learning could help manage multiple outcomes and estimate
heterogeneous treatment effects.
In the long run, new empirical tools have also served to expand the kinds
of problems we work on. The increased use of randomized control trials has also
changed the kinds of questions empirical researchers work on. Ultimately, machine
learning tools may also increase the scope of our work—not just by delivering new
data or new methods but by focusing us on new questions.
■ We are grateful to the editors Gordon Hanson, Enrico Moretti, and Timothy Taylor for their
feedback and to Alberto Abadie, Peter Ganong, Lawrence Katz, Supreet Kaur, Jens Ludwig,
and Andrei Shleifer for thoughtful and detailed comments.
References
Abadie, Alberto, and Maximilian Kasy. 2017. Journal of Finance 59(3): 1259–94.
The Risk of Machine Learning. https://ideas.repec. Athey, Susan. 2015. “Machine Learning and
org/p/qsh/wpaper/383316.html. Causal Inference for Policy Evaluation.” In
Abelson, Brian, Kush R. Varshney, and Joy Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International
Sun. 2014. “Targeting Direct Cash Transfers to the Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining,
Extremely Poor.” In Proceedings of the 20th ACM pp. 5–6. ACM.
SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Athey, Susan, and Guido Imbens. 2016. “Recur-
Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1563–72. ACM. sive Partitioning for Heterogeneous Causal Effects.
Angrist, Joshua D., Guido W. Imbens, and Alan PNAS 113(27): 7353–60.
B. Krueger. 1999. “Jackknife Instrumental Vari- Bekker, Paul A. 1994. “Alternative Approxima-
ables Estimation.” Journal of Applied Econometrics tions to the Distributions of Instrumental Variable
14(1): 57–67 Estimators.” Econometrica 62(3): 657–81.
Angrist, Joshua D., and Alan B. Krueger. 1995. Belloni, Alexandre, Daniel Chen, Victor Cher-
“Split-Sample Instrumental Variables Estimates of nozhukov, and Christian Hansen. 2012. “Sparse
the Return to Schooling.” Journal of Business and Models and Methods for Optimal Instruments with
Economic Statistics 13(2): 225–35. an Application to Eminent Domain.” Econometrica
Angrist, Joshua D., and Jörn-Steffen S. Pischke. 80(6): 2369–2429.
2008. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Belloni, Alexandre, Victor Chernozhukov,
Companion. Princeton University Press. and Christian Hansen. 2011. “Inference for
Antweiler, Werner, and Murray Z. Frank. 2004. High-Dimensional Sparse Econometric Models.”
“Is All That Talk Just Noise? The Information arXiv:1201.0220.
Content of Internet Stock Message Boards.” Belloni, Alexandre, Victor Chernozhukov,
and Christian Hansen. 2014. “Inference on Data in Economics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives
Treatment Effects after Selection among High- 30(4): 171–98.
Dimensional Controls.” Review of Economic Studies Engstrom, Ryan, Jonathan Hersh, and David
81(2): 608–650. Newhouse. 2016. “Poverty from Space: Using
Bernheim, Douglas, Daniel Bjorkegren, Jeffrey High Resolution Satellite Imagery for Estimating
Naecker, and Anatonio Rangel. 2013. “Non- Economic Well-being and Geographic Targeting.”
Choice Evaluations Predict Behavioral Responses Unpublished paper.
to Changes in Economic Conditions.” NBER Einav, Liran, and Jonathan Levin. 2014.
Working Paper 19269. “Economics in the Age of Big Data.” Science
Blumenstock, Joshua E., Gabriel Cadamuro, 346(6210): 1243089.
and Robert On. 2015. “Predicting Poverty and Feigenbaum, James J. 2015a. “Automated
Wealth from Mobile Phone Metadata.” Science Census Record Linking.” http://scholar.
350(6264): 1073–76. har vard.edu/jfeigenbaum/publications/
Blumenstock, Joshua Evan. 2016. “Fighting automated-census-record-linking.
Poverty with Data.” Science 353(6301): 753–54. Feigenbaum, James J. 2015b. “Intergenerational
Bound, John, David A. Jaeger, and Regina M. Mobility during the Great Depression.” http://
Baker. 1995. “Problems with Instrumental Vari- scholar.harvard.edu/jfeigenbaum/publications/
ables Estimation When the Correlation between jmp.
the Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Glaeser, Edward L., Scott Duke Kominers,
Variable is Weak.” Journal of the American Statistical Michael Luca, and Nakhil Naik. 2016. “Big Data
Association 90(430): 443–50. and Big Cities: The Promises and Limitations
Card, David. 1999. “The Causal Effect of Educa- of Improved Measures of Urban Life.” Economic
tion on Earnings.” Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. Inquiry, Early View Article, online July 12.
3A, edited by Orley C. Ashenfelter and David Card, Grimmer, Justin, Solomon Messing, and Sean
1801–1863. North-Holland, Elsevier. J. Westwood. 2016. “Estimating Heterogeneous
Carrasco, Marine 2012. “A Regularization Treatment Effects and the Effects of Heteroge-
Approach to the Many Instruments Problem.” neous Treatments with Ensemble Methods.”
Journal of Econometrics 170(2): 383–98. https://stanford.edu/~jgrimmer/het.pdf.
Chalfin, Aaron, Oren Danieli, Andrew Hillis, Györfi, L., M. Kohler, A. Krzyzak, and H. Walk.
Zubin Jelveh, Michael Luca, Jens Ludwig, and 2002. A Distribution-Free Theory of Nonparametric
Sendhil Mullainathan. 2016. “Productivity and Regression. Springer.
Selection of Human Capital with Machine Hansen, Bruce E. 2014. “Nonparametric
Learning.” American Economic Review 106(5): Sieve Regression: Least Squares, Averaging Least
124–27. Squares, and Cross-Validation.” In The Oxford
Chandler, Dana, Steven D. Levitt, and John A. Handbook of Applied Nonparametric and Semipara-
List. 2011. “Predicting and Preventing Shootings metric Econometrics and Statistics, edited by Jeffrey
among At-Risk Youth.” American Economic Review S. Racine, Liangjun Su, and Aman Ullah. Oxford
101(3): 288–92. Univerity Press.
Chernozhukov, Victor, Denis Chetverikov, Hansen, Christian, and Damian Kozbur. 2014.
Mert Demirer, Esther Duflo, Christian Hansen, “Instrumental Variables Estimation with Many
and Whitney Newey. 2016. “Double Machine Weak instruments using Regularized JIVE.” Journal
Learning for Treatment and Causal Parameters.” of Econometrics 182(2): 290–308.
arXiv:1608.00060. Hartford, Jason, Greg Lewis, Kevin Leyton-
Dawes, Robyn M., David Faust, and Paul E. Brown, and Matt Taddy. 2016. “Counterfactual
Meehl. 1989. “Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment.” Prediction with Deep Instrumental Variables
Science 243(4899): 1668–74. Networks.” arXiv:1612.09596.
Dietvorst, Berkeley J., Joseph P Simmons, and Hastie, Trevor, Robert Tibshirani, and Jerome
Cade Massey. 2015. “Algorithm Aversion: People Friedman. 2009. The Elements of Statistical Learning:
Erroneously Avoid Algorithms after Seeing Them Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Second
Err.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General edition. New York, NY: Springer.
144(1): 114–26. Henderson, J. Vernon, Adam Storeygard,
Dobbie, Will. 2011. “Teacher Characteristics and and David N. Weil. 2012. “Measuring Economic
Student Achievement: Evidence from Teach For Growth from Outer Space.” American Economic
America.” https://www.princeton.edu/~wdobbie/ Review 102(2): 994–1028.
files/dobbie_tfa_2011.pdf. Hoberg, Gerard, and Gordon Phillips. 2016.
Donaldson, Dave, and Adam Storeygard. 2016. “Text-based Network Industries and Endogenous
“The View from Above: Applications of Satellite Product Differentiation. Journal of Political Economy
124(5): 1423–65. Medicine 29(3): 337–46.

Imai, Kosuke, and Aaron Strauss. 2011. “Estima- Leeb, Hannes, and Benedikt M. Pötscher. 2006.
tion of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from “Can One Estimate the Conditional Distribution
Randomized Experiments, with Application to of Post-Model-Selection Estimators?” Annals of
the Optimal Planning of the Get-Out-the-Vote Statistics 34(5): 2554–91.
Campaign.” Political Analysis 19(1): 1–19. Leeb, Hannes, and Bendikt M. Pötscher. 2008.
Jacob, Bryan, Jonah E. Rockoff, Eric S. Taylor, “Can One Estimate the Unconditional Distribution
Benjamin Lindy, and Rachel Rosen. 2016. “Teacher of Post-Model-Selection Estimators?” Econometric
Applicant Hiring and Teacher Performance: Theory 24(2): 338–76.
Evidence from DC Public Schools.” NBER Working Lobell, David B. 2013. “The Use of Satellite
Paper 22054. Data for Crop Yield Gap Analysis.” Field Crops
Jean, Neal, Marshall Burke, Michael Xie, W. Research 143: 56–64.
Matthew Davis, David B. Lobell, and Stefano Ludwig, Jens, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Jann
Ermon. 2016. “Combining Satellite Imagery and Spiess. 2017. “Machine Learning Tests for Effects
Machine Learning to Predict Poverty.” Science on Multiple Outcomes.” Unpublished paper.
353(6301): 790–94. McBride, Linden, and Austin Nichols. 2016.
Kane, Thomas J., and Douglas O. Staiger. 2008. “Retooling Poverty Targeting Using Out-of-Sample
“Estimating Teacher Impacts on Student Achieve- Validation and Machine Learning.” World Bank
ment: An Experimental Evaluation.” NBER Economic Review, lhw056.
Working Paper 14607. Misra, Sanjog, and Jean-Pierre Dubé. 2016.
Kang, Jun Seok, Polina Kuznetsova, Michael “Scalable Price Targeting.” Unpublished paper.
Luca, and Yejin Choi. 2013. “Where Not to Eat? Moritz, Benjamin, and Tom Zimmermann.
Improving Public Policy by Predicting Hygiene 2016. “Tree-Based Conditional Portfolio Sorts: The
Inspections Using Online Reviews.” EMNLP 2013: Relation between Past and Future Stock Returns.”
2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Available at SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/
Language. papers.cfm?abstract_id=2740751.
Kleinberg, Jon, Annie Liang, and Sendhil Peysakhovich, Alexander, and Jeffrey Naecker.
Mullainathan. 2015. “The Theory is Predictive, But 2015. “Using Methods from Machine Learning to
is It Complete? An Application to Human Percep- Evaluate Models of Human Choice.”
tion of Randomness.” Unpublished paper. Staiger, Douglas, and James H. Stock. 1997.
Kleinberg, Jon, Jens Ludwig, Sendhil Mullaina- “Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak
than, and Ziad Obermeyer. 2015. “Prediction Instruments.” Econometrica 65(3): 557–86.
Policy Problems.” American Economic Review van der Vaart, Aad W., Sandrine Dudoit, and
105(5): 491–95. Mark J. van der Laan. 2006. “Oracle Inequalities
Kleinberg, Jon, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Jure for Multi-fold Cross Validation.” Statistics and Deci-
Leskovec, Jens Ludwig, and Sendhil Mullainathan. sions 24(3): 351–71.
2017. “Human Decisions and Machine Predic- Varian, Hal R. 2014. “Big Data: New Tricks for
tions.” NBER Working Paper 23180. Econometrics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives
Kogan, Shimon, Dimitry Levin, Byran R. 28(2): 3–28.
Routledge, Jacob S. Sagi, and Noah A. Smith. Wager, Stefan, and Susan Athey. 2015. “Estima-
2009. “Predicting Risk from Financial Reports with tion and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment
Regression.” In Proceedings of Human Language Effects using Random Forests.” arXiv:1510.04342
Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North Yeomans, Michael, Anuj K. Shah, Sendhil
American Chapter of the Association for Computational Mullainathan, and Jon Kleinberg. 2016. “Making
Linguistics, pp. 272–80. ACM. Sense of Recommendations.” Unpublished paper.
Lee, Brian K., Justin Lessler, and Elizabeth Zhao, Peng, and Bin Yu. 2006. “On Model
A. Stuart. 2010. “Improving Propensity Score Selection Consistency of Lasso.” Journal of Machine
Weighting using Machine Learning.” Statistics in Learning Research 7: 2541–63.
This article has been cited by:
1. Ah Ran Oh, Jungchan Park, Seo Jeong Shin, Byungjin Choi, Jong-Hwan Lee, Seung-Hwa Lee,
Kwangmo Yang. 2023. Prediction model for myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery using machine
learning. Scientific Reports 13:1. . [Crossref]
2. Yogi Sugiawan, Robi Kurniawan, Shunsuke Managi. 2023. Assessing the United Nations sustainable
development goals from the inclusive wealth perspective. Scientific Reports 13:1. . [Crossref]
3. Nhung Nghiem, June Atkinson, Binh P. Nguyen, An Tran-Duy, Nick Wilson. 2023. Predicting high
health-cost users among people with cardiovascular disease using machine learning and nationwide
linked social administrative datasets. Health Economics Review 13:1. . [Crossref]
4. Vijay Kaushik, Noopur Awasthi. 2023. Simulation of reservoir outflows using regression tree and
support vector machine. AI in Civil Engineering 2:1. . [Crossref]
5. Dong Yun Lee, Ah Ran Oh, Jungchan Park, Seung-Hwa Lee, Byungjin Choi, Kwangmo Yang,
Ha Yeon Kim, Rae Woong Park. 2023. Machine learning-based prediction model for postoperative
delirium in non-cardiac surgery. BMC Psychiatry 23:1. . [Crossref]
6. Michael Lechner. 2023. Causal Machine Learning and its use for public policy. Swiss Journal of
Economics and Statistics 159:1. . [Crossref]
7. Yefu Chen, Junfeng Jiao, Arya Farahi. 2023. Disparities in affecting factors of housing price: A machine
learning approach to the effects of housing status, public transit, and density factors on single-family
housing price. Cities 140, 104432. [Crossref]
8. Juan Chen, Feng Ma, Xuemei Qiu, Tao Li. 2023. The role of categorical EPU indices in predicting
stock-market returns. International Review of Economics & Finance 87, 365-378. [Crossref]
9. Stefan Hajkowicz, Conrad Sanderson, Sarvnaz Karimi, Alexandra Bratanova, Claire Naughtin. 2023.
Artificial intelligence adoption in the physical sciences, natural sciences, life sciences, social sciences and
the arts and humanities: A bibliometric analysis of research publications from 1960-2021. Technology
in Society 74, 102260. [Crossref]
10. Michele Rabasco, Pietro Battiston. 2023. Predicting the deterrence effect of tax audits. A machine
learning approach. Metroeconomica 74:3, 531-556. [Crossref]
11. Saahoon Hong, Betty Walton, Hea-Won Kim, Taeho Greg Rhee. 2023. Predicting the Behavioral
Health Needs of Asian Americans in Public Mental Health Treatment: A Classification Tree
Approach. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 50:4,
630-643. [Crossref]
12. Takeshi Yanagiura. 2023. How Accurately Can Short-Term Outcomes Approximate Long-Term
Outcomes? Examining the Predictive Power of Early Momentum Metrics for Community College
Credential Completion Using Machine Learning. Community College Review 51:3, 367-395.
[Crossref]
13. Oren Barkan, Jonathan Benchimol, Itamar Caspi, Eliya Cohen, Allon Hammer, Noam Koenigstein.
2023. Forecasting CPI inflation components with Hierarchical Recurrent Neural Networks.
International Journal of Forecasting 39:3, 1145-1162. [Crossref]
14. Li Yao, He Ni. 2023. Prediction of patent grant and interpreting the key determinants: an application
of interpretable machine learning approach. Scientometrics 27. . [Crossref]
15. Abena Owusu, Aparna Gupta. 2023. Identifying the risk culture of banks using machine learning.
International Journal of Managerial Finance 277. . [Crossref]
16. Masanori Kuroki. 2023. Integrating data science into an econometrics course with a Kaggle
competition. The Journal of Economic Education 1-15. [Crossref]
17. Junho Park, Joseph Berman, Albert Dodson, Yunmei Liu, Matthew Armstrong, He Huang, David
Kaber, Jaime Ruiz, Maryam Zahabi. 2023. Assessing workload in using electromyography (EMG)-
based prostheses. Ergonomics 848, 1-17. [Crossref]
18. Christelle Khalaf, Gilbert Michaud, G. Jason Jolley. 2023. Predicting declining and growing
occupations using supervised machine learning. Journal of Computational Social Science 33. . [Crossref]
19. Philipp Schade, Monika C. Schuhmacher. 2023. Predicting entrepreneurial activity using machine
learning. Journal of Business Venturing Insights 19, e00357. [Crossref]
20. Hamed Taherdoost. 2023. Enhancing Social Media Platforms with Machine Learning Algorithms
and Neural Networks. Algorithms 16:6, 271. [Crossref]
21. Arthur Charpentier, Romuald Élie, Carl Remlinger. 2023. Reinforcement Learning in Economics and
Finance. Computational Economics 62:1, 425-462. [Crossref]
22. Juan Laborda, Sonia Ruano, Ignacio Zamanillo. 2023. Multi-Country and Multi-Horizon GDP
Forecasting Using Temporal Fusion Transformers. Mathematics 11:12, 2625. [Crossref]
23. Zhongming Wu, Liu Yang, Yue Fei, Xiulai Wang. 2023. Regularization methods for sparse ESG-
valued multi-period portfolio optimization with return prediction using machine learning. Expert
Systems with Applications 74, 120850. [Crossref]
24. Yamin Ahmad, Adam Check, Ming Chien Lo. 2023. Unit Roots in Macroeconomic Time Series:
A Comparison of Classical, Bayesian and Machine Learning Approaches. Computational Economics
20. . [Crossref]
25. Guan-Yuan Wang. 2023. Integrating Street Views, Satellite Imageries and Remote Sensing Data Into
Economics and the Social Sciences. Social Science Computer Review 089443932311786. [Crossref]
26. T. S. McElroy, Thomas Trimbur. 2023. Variable targeting and reduction in large vector
autoregressions with applications to workforce indicators. Journal of Applied Statistics 50:7, 1515-1537.
[Crossref]
27. Md. Mohsan Khudri, Kang Keun Rhee, Mohammad Shabbir Hasan, Karar Zunaid Ahsan. 2023.
Predicting nutritional status for women of childbearing age from their economic, health, and
demographic features: A supervised machine learning approach. PLOS ONE 18:5, e0277738.
[Crossref]
28. Kerda Varaku, Robin Sickles. 2023. Public subsidies and innovation: a doubly robust machine learning
approach leveraging deep neural networks. Empirical Economics 174. . [Crossref]
29. Heinz Leitgöb, Dimitri Prandner, Tobias Wolbring. 2023. Editorial: Big data and machine learning
in sociology. Frontiers in Sociology 8. . [Crossref]
30. Haolun Huang. 2023. Ridesharing Price Prediction: Exploring the strategies of Dynamic Pricing.
Highlights in Business, Economics and Management 10, 106-110. [Crossref]
31. Peng Huang. 2023. Internet financial forecasting and digital economy development by using machine
learning algorithm in the new consumption environment. Soft Computing 3. . [Crossref]
32. Qin Zhang, He Ni, Hao Xu. 2023. Nowcasting Chinese GDP in a data-rich environment: Lessons
from machine learning algorithms. Economic Modelling 122, 106204. [Crossref]
33. Paul M. Anglin, Yanmin Gao. 2023. Value of Communication and Social Media: An Equilibrium
Theory of Messaging. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 66:4, 861-903. [Crossref]
34. Evaggelia Siopi, Thomas Poufinas, James Ming Chen, Charalampos Agiropoulos. 2023. Can
Regulation Affect the Solvency of Insurers? New Evidence from European Insurers. International
Advances in Economic Research 29:1-2, 15-30. [Crossref]
35. Shuiyang Pan, Suwan(Cheng) Long, Yiming Wang, Ying Xie. 2023. Nonlinear asset pricing in
Chinese stock market: A deep learning approach. International Review of Financial Analysis 87, 102627.
[Crossref]
36. Jorge Antunes, Peter Wanke, Thiago Fonseca, Yong Tan. 2023. Do ESG Risk Scores Influence
Financial Distress? Evidence from a Dynamic NDEA Approach. Sustainability 15:9, 7560. [Crossref]
37. Samarra Badrouchi, Mohamed Mongi Bacha, Hafedh Hedri, Taieb Ben Abdallah, Ezzedine
Abderrahim. 2023. Toward generalizing the use of artificial intelligence in nephrology and kidney
transplantation. Journal of Nephrology 36:4, 1087-1100. [Crossref]
38. Moritz Meister, Annekatrin Niebuhr, Jan Cornelius Peters, Johannes Stiller. 2023. Local attributes
and migration balance – evidence for different age and skill groups from a machine learning approach.
Regional Science Policy & Practice 15:4, 794-825. [Crossref]
39. Justin J. P. Jansen, Ciaran Heavey, Tom J. M. Mom, Zeki Simsek, Shaker A. Zahra. 2023. Scaling‐
up: Building, Leading and Sustaining Rapid Growth Over Time. Journal of Management Studies 60:3,
581-604. [Crossref]
40. Doohee Chung, Pilwon Jeong, Donghwan Kwon, Hyunsoo Han. 2023. Technology acceptance
prediction of robo-advisors by machine learning. Intelligent Systems with Applications 18, 200197.
[Crossref]
41. Valentin Zelenyuk. 2023. Aggregation in efficiency and productivity analysis: a brief review with new
insights and justifications for constant returns to scale. Journal of Productivity Analysis 13. . [Crossref]
42. Xinni Cai, Fuxiu Jiang, Jun-Koo Kang. 2023. Remote Board Meetings and Board Monitoring
Effectiveness: Evidence from China. The Review of Financial Studies 46. . [Crossref]
43. Xiaolan Yang, Yidong Huang, Wenchao Li. 2023. Economic preferences and state-level corruption:
global evidence and mechanism. Applied Economics Letters 30:7, 892-912. [Crossref]
44. Orçun Moralı, Neslihan Yilmaz. Analysis of Real Estate Prices Using Geospatial Data 180-195.
[Crossref]
45. A Poojitha Reddy, Anirban Tarafdar, Uttam Kumar Bera. Regression based Machine Learning
approach to predict Flight Price between Bangalore and Kolkata 1-6. [Crossref]
46. Dario Sansone, Anna Zhu. 2023. Using Machine Learning to Create an Early Warning System for
Welfare Recipients*. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 355. . [Crossref]
47. Niko Hauzenberger, Florian Huber, Karin Klieber. 2023. Real-time inflation forecasting using non-
linear dimension reduction techniques. International Journal of Forecasting 39:2, 901-921. [Crossref]
48. Ephraim Kwashie Thompson, Samuel Buertey. 2023. Which firms opt for corporate social
responsibility assurance? A machine learning prediction. Business Ethics, the Environment &
Responsibility 32:2, 599-611. [Crossref]
49. Chandler McClellan, Emily Mitchell, Jerrod Anderson, Samuel Zuvekas. 2023. Using machine‐
learning algorithms to improve imputation in the medical expenditure panel survey. Health Services
Research 58:2, 423-432. [Crossref]
50. J. Michelle Brock, Ralph De Haas. 2023. Discriminatory Lending: Evidence from Bankers in the
Lab. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 15:2, 31-68. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF
with links]
51. S. W. F. de Rezende, B. P. Barella, J. R. V. Moura, K. M. Tsuruta, A. A. Cavalini, V. Steffen. 2023.
ISHM for fault condition detection in rotating machines with deep learning models. Journal of the
Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 45:4. . [Crossref]
52. Hazal Colak Oz, Çiçek Güven, Gonzalo Nápoles. 2023. School dropout prediction and feature
importance exploration in Malawi using household panel data: machine learning approach. Journal of
Computational Social Science 6:1, 245-287. [Crossref]
53. Joshua S. Gans. 2023. Artificial intelligence adoption in a competitive market. Economica 90:358,
690-705. [Crossref]
54. Mehmet Güney Celbiş, Pui‐hang Wong, Karima Kourtit, Peter Nijkamp. 2023. Impacts of the
COVID‐19 outbreak on older‐age cohorts in European Labor Markets: A machine learning
exploration of vulnerable groups. Regional Science Policy & Practice 15:3, 559-584. [Crossref]
55. Jing Hao, Feng He, Feng Ma, Shibo Zhang, Xiaotao Zhang. 2023. Machine learning vs deep learning
in stock market investment: an international evidence. Annals of Operations Research 6. . [Crossref]
56. José Cadena, Manuel Villa, Maira Martínez, Jaime Acurio, Luis Chacón. 2023. An Efficient Technique
for Global Facial Recognition using Python and OpenCV in 2D Images. WSEAS TRANSACTIONS
ON SYSTEMS AND CONTROL 18, 47-57. [Crossref]
57. Juergen Deppner, Benedict von Ahlefeldt-Dehn, Eli Beracha, Wolfgang Schaefers. 2023. Boosting
the Accuracy of Commercial Real Estate Appraisals: An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach.
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 39. . [Crossref]
58. S. Salcedo-Sanz, S. Cornejo-Bueno, D. Casillas-Pérez, C. Camacho-Gómez, L. Cuadra, M. I.
Chidean, A. J. Caamaño. 2023. Collaboration and competition spatial complex networks in regional
science. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 74. . [Crossref]
59. Emmanouil Tranos, André Carrascal-Incera, George Willis. 2023. Using the Web to Predict Regional
Trade Flows: Data Extraction, Modeling, and Validation. Annals of the American Association of
Geographers 113:3, 717-739. [Crossref]
60. Süheyl Uçucu, Talha Karabıyık, Fatih Mehmet Azik. 2023. Machine learning models can predict the
presence of variants in hemoglobin: artificial neural network-based recognition of human hemoglobin
variants by HPLC. Turkish Journal of Biochemistry 48:1, 5-11. [Crossref]
61. Tobias Götze, Marc Gürtler, Eileen Witowski. 2023. Forecasting accuracy of machine learning and
linear regression: evidence from the secondary CAT bond market. Journal of Business Economics 34. .
[Crossref]
62. Guan‐Yuan Wang. 2023. The effect of environment on housing prices: Evidence from the Google
Street View. Journal of Forecasting 42:2, 288-311. [Crossref]
63. PAUL GEERTSEMA, HELEN LU. 2023. Relative Valuation with Machine Learning. Journal of
Accounting Research 61:1, 329-376. [Crossref]
64. Philip S. Dale, Alexander Paul, Michael Rosholm, Dorthe Bleses. 2023. Prediction from early
childhood vocabulary to academic achievement at the end of compulsory schooling in Denmark.
International Journal of Behavioral Development 47:2, 123-134. [Crossref]
65. Majid Majzoubi, Eric Yanfei Zhao. 2023. Going beyond optimal distinctiveness: Strategic positioning
for gaining an audience composition premium. Strategic Management Journal 44:3, 737-777.
[Crossref]
66. Gert Bijnens, Shyngys Karimov, Jozef Konings. 2023. Does Automatic Wage Indexation Destroy Jobs?
A Machine Learning Approach. De Economist 171:1, 85-117. [Crossref]
67. Debdatta Saha, Timothy M. Young, Jessica Thacker. 2023. Predicting firm performance and size
using machine learning with a Bayesian perspective. Machine Learning with Applications 11, 100453.
[Crossref]
68. Rafael Abrantes Penchel, Ivan Aldaya, Lucas Marim, Mirian Paula dos Santos, Lucio Cardozo-Filho,
Veeriah Jegatheesan, José Augusto de Oliveira. 2023. Analysis of Cleaner Production Performance
in Manufacturing Companies Employing Artificial Neural Networks. Applied Sciences 13:6, 4029.
[Crossref]
69. Natalia Pecorari, Jose Cuesta. Citizen Participation and Political Trust in Latin America and the
Caribbean: A Machine Learning Approach 10085, . [Crossref]
70. Martin Magris, Mostafa Shabani, Alexandros Iosifidis. 2023. Bayesian bilinear neural network for
predicting the mid‐price dynamics in limit‐order book markets. Journal of Forecasting 112. . [Crossref]
71. Yuexi Liu. 2023. A Machine Learning Approach for Selecting Directors of Chinese Listed Company.
Highlights in Business, Economics and Management 5, 380-389. [Crossref]
72. Daniela M. Behr, Lixue Chen, Ankita Goel, Khondoker Tanveer Haider, Sandeep Singh, Asad Zaman.
Estimating House Prices in Emerging Markets and Developing Economies: A Big Data Approach
4, . [Crossref]
73. Filipe R Campante, Davin Chor, Bingjing Li. 2023. The Political Economy Consequences of China’s
Export Slowdown. Journal of the European Economic Association 34. . [Crossref]
74. Daniel Hoang, Kevin Wiegratz. 2023. Machine learning methods in finance: Recent applications and
prospects. European Financial Management 24. . [Crossref]
75. Jill Furzer, Maripier Isabelle, Boriana Miloucheva, Audrey Laporte. 2023. Public drug insurance, moral
hazard and children's use of mental health medication: Latent mental health risk‐specific responses
to lower out‐of‐pocket treatment costs. Health Economics 32:2, 518-538. [Crossref]
76. Luara A. Freitas, Rodrigo P. Savegnago, Anderson A. C. Alves, Ricardo L. D. Costa, Danisio
P. Munari, Nedenia B. Stafuzza, Guilherme J. M. Rosa, Claudia C. P. Paz. 2023. Classification
Performance of Machine Learning Methods for Identifying Resistance, Resilience, and Susceptibility
to Haemonchus contortus Infections in Sheep. Animals 13:3, 374. [Crossref]
77. Rafael Quintana. 2023. Embracing complexity in social science research. Quality & Quantity 57:1,
15-38. [Crossref]
78. Suriyan Jomthanachai, Wai Peng Wong, Khai Wah Khaw. 2023. An Application of Machine
Learning to Logistics Performance Prediction: An Economics Attribute-Based of Collective Instance.
Computational Economics 22. . [Crossref]
79. Tiantian Zhang, Yongtang Wu, Yuling Chen, Tao Li, Xiaojun Ren. 2023. Collaborative Energy
Price Computing Based on Sarima-Ann and Asymmetric Stackelberg Games. Symmetry 15:2, 443.
[Crossref]
80. Hai-Van Thi Mai, May Huu Nguyen, Hai-Bang Ly. 2023. Development of machine learning methods
to predict the compressive strength of fiber-reinforced self-compacting concrete and sensitivity
analysis. Construction and Building Materials 367, 130339. [Crossref]
81. Thema Monroe-White, Jesse Lecy. 2023. The Wells-Du Bois Protocol for Machine Learning Bias:
Building Critical Quantitative Foundations for Third Sector Scholarship. VOLUNTAS: International
Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 34:1, 170-184. [Crossref]
82. Rashid Zaman. 2023. When corporate culture matters: The case of stakeholder violations. The British
Accounting Review 48, 101188. [Crossref]
83. Katherine Hoffmann Pham, Miguel Luengo-Oroz. 2023. Predictive modelling of movements of
refugees and internally displaced people: towards a computational framework. Journal of Ethnic and
Migration Studies 49:2, 408-444. [Crossref]
84. Mario D. Molina, Nancy Chau, Amanda D. Rodewald, Filiz Garip. 2023. How to model the weather-
migration link: a machine-learning approach to variable selection in the Mexico-U.S. context. Journal
of Ethnic and Migration Studies 49:2, 465-491. [Crossref]
85. Rajesh Kumar Maurya, Himani Jain, Tarun Kumar Sharma, Surbhi Sharma, Mani Dublish. Novel
Framework for Quality Crop Predictions Using Data Mining and Soft Computing Techniques 83-88.
[Crossref]
86. Christoph Kern, Bernd Weiß, Jan-Philipp Kolb. 2023. Predicting Nonresponse in Future Waves
of a Probability-Based Mixed-Mode Panel with Machine Learning. Journal of Survey Statistics and
Methodology 11:1, 100-123. [Crossref]
87. Wen Lin. 2023. The effect of product quantity on willingness to pay: A meta‐regression analysis of
beef valuation studies. Agribusiness 87. . [Crossref]
88. Xianglong Xu, Eric P. F. Chow, Christopher K. Fairley, Marcus Chen, Ivette Aguirre, Jane Goller,
Jane Hocking, Natalie Carvalho, Lei Zhang, Jason J. Ong. 2023. Determinants and prediction of
Chlamydia trachomatis re-testing and re-infection within 1 year among heterosexuals with chlamydia
attending a sexual health clinic. Frontiers in Public Health 10. . [Crossref]
89. Hamza Heni, S. Arona Diop, Jacques Renaud, Leandro C. Coelho. 2023. Measuring fuel consumption
in vehicle routing: new estimation models using supervised learning. International Journal of
Production Research 61:1, 114-130. [Crossref]
90. Oleksandr Fomin, Sergii Polozhaenko, Valentyn Krykun, Andrii Orlov, Daria Lys. Interpretation of
Dynamic Models Based on Neural Networks in the Form of Integral-Power Series 258-265. [Crossref]
91. Gabriel M. Ahlfeldt, Stephan Heblich, Tobias Seidel. 2023. Micro-geographic property price and rent
indices. Regional Science and Urban Economics 98, 103836. [Crossref]
92. Pushpendra Rana, Lav R. Varshney. 2023. Exploring limits to tree planting as a natural climate
solution. Journal of Cleaner Production 384, 135566. [Crossref]
93. Anderson Monken, William Ampeh, Flora Haberkorn, Uma Krishnaswamy, Feras A. Batarseh.
Assuring AI methods for economic policymaking 371-427. [Crossref]
94. Andrés Alonso, José Manuel Carbó, J. Manuel Marqués. 2023. Machine Learning methods in climate
finance: a systematic review. SSRN Electronic Journal 225. . [Crossref]
95. Ragupathy Venkatachalam, Shu G. Wang. Computational Thinking in Economics and Finance:
Introductory Remarks 1-12. [Crossref]
96. Gunther Dahm, Frauke Peter. Einfach anders oder vielfältig verschieden? Ein differenzierter Blick auf
Hochschulabsolvent*innen mit beruflicher Vorqualifikation 223-262. [Crossref]
97. M. van der Westhuizen, K. H. von Leipzig, V. Hummel. Augmented Reality Combined with Machine
Learning to Increase Productivity in Fruit Packing 415-431. [Crossref]
98. Brett R. Gordon, Mitchell J. Lovett, Bowen Luo, James C. Reeder. 2023. Disentangling the Effects
of Ad Tone on Voter Turnout and Candidate Choice in Presidential Elections. Management Science
69:1, 220-243. [Crossref]
99. Yuval Heller, itay tubul. 2023. Strategies in the Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma: A Cluster Analysis.
SSRN Electronic Journal 144. . [Crossref]
100. Jack Fitzgerald Sice, Finnian Lattimore, Tim Robinson, Anna Zhu. 2023. Practical Insights Into
Applying Double LASSO. SSRN Electronic Journal 33. . [Crossref]
101. Dmitry Erokhin, Martin Zagler. 2023. Explaining and Predicting Double Tax Treaty Formation with
Machine Learning Algorithms. SSRN Electronic Journal 9. . [Crossref]
102. Xianfei Hui, Baiqing Sun, Indranil SenGupta, Yan Zhou, Hui Jiang. 2023. Stochastic volatility
modeling of high-frequency CSI 300 index and dynamic jump prediction driven by machine learning.
Electronic Research Archive 31:3, 1365-1386. [Crossref]
103. Matteo Benetton, Giovanni Compiani, Adair Morse. 2023. When Cryptomining Comes to Town:
High Electricity-Use Spillovers to the Local Economy. SSRN Electronic Journal 112. . [Crossref]
104. Jiangning Wu, Tong Yang. Knowledge Discovery from Online Reviews 71-104. [Crossref]
105. Francesca Micocci, Armando Rungi. 2023. Predicting Exporters with Machine Learning. World Trade
Review 1. [Crossref]
106. Georgios A. Papanastasopoulos, John Sorros, Antonios M. Vasilatos. 2023. Do Raw Accounting Data
Convey Information About R&D Costs Accounting Treatment? An Investigation With Machine
Learning. SSRN Electronic Journal 36. . [Crossref]
107. Christophe Hurlin, Christophe Pérignon. 2023. Machine Learning and IRB Capital Requirements:
Advantages, Risks, and Recommendations. SSRN Electronic Journal 18. . [Crossref]
108. Douglas Araujo. 2023. Gingado: A Machine Learning Library Focused on Economics and Finance.
109. Brian A. Bourquard, Gemma Berenguer, Allan W. Gray, Paul V. Preckel. 2022. Raw material variability
in food manufacturing: a data-driven snack food industry case. Production & Manufacturing Research
10:1, 294-320. [Crossref]
110. Hicham Sadok, Fadi Sakka, Mohammed El Hadi El Maknouzi. 2022. Artificial intelligence and bank
credit analysis: A review. Cogent Economics & Finance 10:1. . [Crossref]
111. Omid Rafieian. 2022. Optimizing User Engagement Through Adaptive Ad Sequencing. Marketing
Science 21. . [Crossref]
112. Nimisha Malik, Bhavik Agarwal. Time Series Nowcasting of India’s GDP with Machine Learning
1-6. [Crossref]
113. Hannes Mueller, Christopher Rauh. 2022. The Hard Problem of Prediction for Conflict Prevention.
Journal of the European Economic Association 20:6, 2440-2467. [Crossref]
114. Erlend Eide Bø, Per Medby, Odd Erik Nygård, Mona Takle. 2022. Hedonisk verdsettelse av bolig
med fleksibel geografisk inndeling. Tidsskrift for boligforskning 5:2, 70-87. [Crossref]
115. Muhammed Umar Farrukh, Richard Wainwright, Keeley Crockett, David McLean, Neil Dagnall.
Building Actionable Personas Using Machine Learning Techniques 463-472. [Crossref]
116. Pedro Henrique Melo Albuquerque, Yaohao Peng, João Pedro Fontoura da Silva. 2022. Making the
whole greater than the sum of its parts: A literature review of ensemble methods for financial time
series forecasting. Journal of Forecasting 41:8, 1701-1724. [Crossref]
117. Francesco Decarolis, Cristina Giorgiantonio. 2022. Corruption red flags in public procurement: new
evidence from Italian calls for tenders. EPJ Data Science 11:1. . [Crossref]
118. Huu Duy Nguyen. 2022. GIS-based hybrid machine learning for flood susceptibility prediction in the
Nhat Le–Kien Giang watershed, Vietnam. Earth Science Informatics 15:4, 2369-2386. [Crossref]
119. Netta Barak‐Corren, Yoav Kan‐Tor, Nelson Tebbe. 2022. Examining the effects of antidiscrimination
laws on children in the foster care and adoption systems. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 19:4,
1003-1066. [Crossref]
120. Yudai Suzuki, Qi Gao, Ken C. Pradel, Kenji Yasuoka, Naoki Yamamoto. 2022. Natural quantum
reservoir computing for temporal information processing. Scientific Reports 12:1. . [Crossref]
121. Micha Kaiser, Steffen Otterbach, Alfonso Sousa-Poza. 2022. Using machine learning to uncover the
relation between age and life satisfaction. Scientific Reports 12:1. . [Crossref]
122. Minghua Xu, Ziyao Wei, Jiang Wu. 2022. How emotional communication happens in social media:
Predicting “Arousal-Homophily-Echo” emotional communication with multi-dimensional features.
Telematics and Informatics Reports 8, 100019. [Crossref]
123. TINGBIN BIAN, JIN CHEN, QU FENG, JINGYI LI. 2022. COMPARING ECONOMETRIC
ANALYSES WITH MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES: A STUDY ON SINGAPORE
PRIVATE PROPERTY MARKET. The Singapore Economic Review 67:06, 1787-1810. [Crossref]
124. Ebru Çağlayan Akay, Naciye Tuba Yılmaz Soydan, Burcu Kocarık Gacar. 2022. Bibliometric analysis of
the published literature on machine learning in economics and econometrics. Social Network Analysis
and Mining 12:1. . [Crossref]
125. Qishuo Gao, Vivien Shi, Christopher Pettit, Hoon Han. 2022. Property valuation using machine
learning algorithms on statistical areas in Greater Sydney, Australia. Land Use Policy 123, 106409.
[Crossref]
126. Elizabeth Jane Casabianca, Michele Catalano, Lorenzo Forni, Elena Giarda, Simone Passeri. 2022. A
machine learning approach to rank the determinants of banking crises over time and across countries.
Journal of International Money and Finance 129, 102739. [Crossref]
127. Perry Sadorsky. 2022. Using machine learning to predict clean energy stock prices: How important are
market volatility and economic policy uncertainty?. Journal of Climate Finance 1, 100002. [Crossref]
128. Haixiang Yao, Shenghao Xia, Hao Liu. 2022. Six-factor asset pricing and portfolio investment via deep
learning: Evidence from Chinese stock market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 76, 101886. [Crossref]
129. Edward I. Altman, Marco Balzano, Alessandro Giannozzi, Stjepan Srhoj. 2022. Revisiting SME default
predictors: The Omega Score. Journal of Small Business Management 8, 1-35. [Crossref]
130. Hernando Grueso. 2022. Unveiling the Causal Mechanisms Within Multidimensional Poverty.
Evaluation Review 149, 0193841X2211409. [Crossref]
131. Ibrahim Niankara. Sustainability Through Open Data Sharing and Reuse in The Digital Economy
1-11. [Crossref]
132. Chengyan Gu. 2022. Market segmentation and dynamic price discrimination in the U.S. airline
industry. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 97. . [Crossref]
133. Lidia Ceriani, Sergio Olivieri, Marco Ranzani. 2022. Housing, imputed rent, and household welfare.
The Journal of Economic Inequality 38. . [Crossref]
134. Angela L Duckworth, Katherine L Milkman. 2022. A guide to megastudies. PNAS Nexus 1:5. .
[Crossref]
135. Yunhe Lu. 2022. Detecting Imperfect Substitution between Comparably Skilled Immigrants and
Natives: A Machine Learning Approach. International Migration Review 28, 019791832211264.
[Crossref]
136. Jinwoo Jung, Jihwan Kim, Changha Jin. 2022. DOES MACHINE LEARNING PREDICTION
DAMPEN THE INFORMATION ASYMMETRY FOR NON-LOCAL INVESTORS?.
International Journal of Strategic Property Management 26:5, 345-361. [Crossref]
137. Byron Botha, Rulof Burger, Kevin Kotzé, Neil Rankin, Daan Steenkamp. 2022. Big data forecasting
of South African inflation. Empirical Economics 78. . [Crossref]
138. Ari Hyytinen, Petri Rouvinen, Mika Pajarinen, Joosua Virtanen. 2022. Ex Ante Predictability of Rapid
Growth: A Design Science Approach. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30, 104225872211282.
[Crossref]
139. Prothit Sen, Phanish Puranam. 2022. Do Alliance portfolios encourage or impede new business
practice adoption? Theory and evidence from the private equity industry. Strategic Management
Journal 43:11, 2279-2312. [Crossref]
140. Byungjin Choi, Ah Ran Oh, Seung-Hwa Lee, Dong Yun Lee, Jong-Hwan Lee, Kwangmo Yang, Ha
Yeon Kim, Rae Woong Park, Jungchan Park. 2022. Prediction Model for 30-Day Mortality after Non-
Cardiac Surgery Using Machine-Learning Techniques Based on Preoperative Evaluation of Electronic
Medical Records. Journal of Clinical Medicine 11:21, 6487. [Crossref]
141. Hector O. Zapata, Supratik Mukhopadhyay. 2022. A Bibliometric Analysis of Machine Learning
Econometrics in Asset Pricing. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15:11, 535. [Crossref]
142. Guido de Blasio, Alessio D'Ignazio, Marco Letta. 2022. Gotham city. Predicting ‘corrupted’
municipalities with machine learning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 184, 122016.
[Crossref]
143. Xue-Zhong He, Shen Lin. 2022. Reinforcement Learning Equilibrium in Limit Order Markets.
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 144, 104497. [Crossref]
144. Christian Leuz. 2022. Towards a design-based approach to accounting research. Journal of Accounting
and Economics 74:2-3, 101550. [Crossref]
145. Ian Lundberg, Jennie E. Brand, Nanum Jeon. 2022. Researcher reasoning meets computational
capacity: Machine learning for social science. Social Science Research 108, 102807. [Crossref]
146. Rama K. Malladi. 2022. Application of Supervised Machine Learning Techniques to Forecast the
COVID-19 U.S. Recession and Stock Market Crash. Computational Economics 8. . [Crossref]
147. Khondhaker Al Momin, Saurav Barua, Omar Faruqe Hamim, Subrata Roy. 2022. Modeling the
Behavior in Choosing the Travel Mode for Long-Distance Travel Using Supervised Machine Learning
Algorithms. Communications - Scientific letters of the University of Zilina 24:4, A187-A197. [Crossref]
148. Sathya Uma Lakshmi Kandasamy, Piyush Kumar Singh, Dillip Kumar Swain. 2022. Determination
of Factors Affecting the Adoption of Integrated Farming System in Dryland Areas of Southern India
by Using Supervised Learning Techniques. Journal of Asian and African Studies 66, 002190962211303.
[Crossref]
149. David M Reeb, Wanli Zhao. 2022. Disregarding the Shoulders of Giants: Inferences from Innovation
Research. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies 11:4, 923-964. [Crossref]
150. Mariia Garkavenko, Tatiana Beliaeva, Eric Gaussier, Hamid Mirisaee, Cédric Lagnier, Agnès Guerraz.
2022. Assessing the Factors Related to a Start-Up’s Valuation Using Prediction and Causal Discovery.
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 18, 104225872211212. [Crossref]
151. Kathleen T. Li, Christophe Van den Bulte. 2022. Augmented Difference-in-Differences. Marketing
Science . [Crossref]
152. Christian P R Schmid, Nicolas Schreiner, Alois Stutzer. 2022. Transfer Payment Systems and
Financial Distress: Insights from Health Insurance Premium Subsidies. Journal of the European
Economic Association 20:5, 1829-1858. [Crossref]
153. Steen Nielsen. 2022. Management accounting and the concepts of exploratory data analysis and
unsupervised machine learning: a literature study and future directions. Journal of Accounting &
Organizational Change 18:5, 811-853. [Crossref]
154. Alessandra Garbero, Marco Letta. 2022. Predicting household resilience with machine learning:
preliminary cross-country tests. Empirical Economics 63:4, 2057-2070. [Crossref]
155. Simon Blöthner, Mario Larch. 2022. Economic determinants of regional trade agreements revisited
using machine learning. Empirical Economics 63:4, 1771-1807. [Crossref]
156. Werner Kristjanpoller, Nicole Astudillo, Josephine E. Olson. 2022. An empirical application of a
hybrid ANFIS model to predict household over-indebtedness. Neural Computing and Applications
34:20, 17343-17353. [Crossref]
157. Nicolas Robette. 2022. Trees and forest. Recursive partitioning as an alternative to parametric
regression models in social sciences. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie
Sociologique 156:1, 7-56. [Crossref]
158. Marina Bonaccolto-Töpfer, Stephanie Briel. 2022. The gender pay gap revisited: Does machine
learning offer new insights?. Labour Economics 78, 102223. [Crossref]
159. Braeden Van Deynze, Robert Fonner, Blake E. Feist, Sunny L. Jardine, Daniel S. Holland. 2022.
What influences spatial variability in restoration costs? Econometric cost models for inference and
prediction in restoration planning. Biological Conservation 274, 109710. [Crossref]
160. Xueqiu Zhuang, Huihua Jiao, Li Kang. 2022. Digital Management and Optimization of Tourism
Information Resources Based on Machine Learning. International Transactions on Electrical Energy
Systems 2022, 1-12. [Crossref]
161. Ankita Raj, Sunil Kumar Singh. Forecasting GDP of India and its neighbouring countries using Time
Series Analysis 1-6. [Crossref]
162. Shahrbanoo Rezaei, Anahita Khojandi, Antora Mohsena Haque, Candace Brakewood, Mingzhou
Jin, Christopher Cherry. 2022. Performance evaluation of mode choice models under balanced and
imbalanced data assumptions. Transportation Letters 14:8, 920-932. [Crossref]
163. Abdus Samad Azad, Rajalingam Sokkalingam, Hanita Daud, Sajal Kumar Adhikary. Application
Water Level Prediction Through Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average: Red Hills
Reservoir Case Study 1-6. [Crossref]
164. Kaifeng Chen, Kunrong Zeng. 2022. Performance Optimization Model of Molecular Dynamics
Simulation Based on Machine Learning and Data Mining Algorithm. Mobile Information Systems
2022, 1-12. [Crossref]
165. Cigdem Kosar Tas, Huseyin Guler, Yeliz Yalcin. 2022. The usage of bridge estimator to determine the
order of integration for possibly integrated series as an alternative to Dickey–Pantula unit root test.
Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 30, 1-17. [Crossref]
166. Manivel Murugan, Sankaran Marisamynathan. 2022. Estimation of two-wheeler users’ mode shift
behavior and policy analysis to encourage electric-bike adoption in India. Case Studies on Transport
Policy 10:3, 1673-1685. [Crossref]
167. Antonio Pacifico. 2022. Structural Compressed Panel VAR with Stochastic Volatility: A Robust
Bayesian Model Averaging Procedure. Econometrics 10:3, 28. [Crossref]
168. João B. Assunção, Pedro Afonso Fernandes. 2022. Nowcasting GDP: An Application to Portugal.
Forecasting 4:3, 717-731. [Crossref]
169. Muzaffer Eroğlu, Meltem Karatepe Kaya. 2022. Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Corporate Board
Diversity Policies and Regulations. European Business Organization Law Review 23:3, 541-572.
[Crossref]
170. Tsun Se Cheong, Guanghua Wan, David Kam Hung Chui. 2022. Unveiling the Relationship between
Economic Growth and Equality for Developing Countries. China & World Economy 30:5, 1-28.
[Crossref]
171. Marcos Delprato, Alessia Frola, Germán Antequera. 2022. Indigenous and non-Indigenous proficiency
gaps for out-of-school and in-school populations: A machine learning approach. International Journal
of Educational Development 93, 102631. [Crossref]
172. Klaus Grobys, James W. Kolari, Joachim Niang. 2022. Man versus machine: on artificial intelligence
and hedge funds performance. Applied Economics 54:40, 4632-4646. [Crossref]
173. Muneer M. Alshater, Ilias Kampouris, Hazem Marashdeh, Osama F. Atayah, Hasanul Banna. 2022.
Early warning system to predict energy prices: the role of artificial intelligence and machine learning.
Annals of Operations Research 221. . [Crossref]
174. Liang Lu, Guang Tian, Patrick Hatzenbuehler. 2022. How agricultural economists are using big data:
a review. China Agricultural Economic Review 14:3, 494-508. [Crossref]
175. Jing Yao, Yanze Li. 2022. Youth Sports Special Skills’ Training and Evaluation System Based on
Machine Learning. Mobile Information Systems 2022, 1-10. [Crossref]
176. Chih-Hung Pai, Sai Xu, Jianren Jin, Yunfeng Shang. 2022. Value evaluation of cultural tourism
tourists’ psychological expectation based on machine learning data mining. Frontiers in Psychology
13. . [Crossref]
177. Mari O. Mamre, Dag Einar Sommervoll. 2022. Coming of Age: Renovation Premiums in Housing
Markets. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 30. . [Crossref]
178. John Kommunuri. 2022. Artificial intelligence and the changing landscape of accounting: a viewpoint.
Pacific Accounting Review 34:4, 585-594. [Crossref]
179. Mona Aghdaee, Bonny Parkinson, Kompal Sinha, Yuanyuan Gu, Rajan Sharma, Emma Olin, Henry
Cutler. 2022. An examination of machine learning to map non‐preference based patient reported
outcome measures to health state utility values. Health Economics 31:8, 1525-1557. [Crossref]
180. Mehmet Salti, Emel Ciger, Evrim Ersin Kangal, Bilgin Zengin. 2022. Data-driven predictive modeling
of Hubble parameter. Physica Scripta 97:8, 085011. [Crossref]
181. Jing Xu, Ren Zhang, Yangjun Wang, Hengqian Yan, Quanhong Liu, Yutong Guo, Yongcun Ren.
2022. Assessing China’s Investment Risk of the Maritime Silk Road: A Model Based on Multiple
Machine Learning Methods. Energies 15:16, 5780. [Crossref]
182. Alice Bertoletti, Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent, Tommaso Agasisti. 2022. Higher education systems and
regional economic development in Europe: A combined approach using econometric and machine
learning methods. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 82, 101231. [Crossref]
183. Furkan Kartal, Uğur Özveren. 2022. Prediction of activation energy for combustion and pyrolysis by
means of machine learning. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress 33, 101346. [Crossref]
184. Thomas PlÖtz. 2022. Applying Machine Learning for Sensor Data Analysis in Interactive Systems.
ACM Computing Surveys 54:6, 1-25. [Crossref]
185. Yunlong Tong. 2022. Assessment of Physical Fitness and Health Status of Athletes Based on
Intelligent Medical Treatment under Machine Learning. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
2022, 1-13. [Crossref]
186. Lida Kuang, Samruda Pobbathi, Yuri Mansury, Matthew A. Shapiro, Vijay K. Gurbani. 2022.
Predicting age and gender from network telemetry: Implications for privacy and impact on policy.
PLOS ONE 17:7, e0271714. [Crossref]
187. Matthias Westphal, Daniel A Kamhöfer, Hendrik Schmitz. 2022. Marginal College Wage Premiums
Under Selection Into Employment. The Economic Journal 132:646, 2231-2272. [Crossref]
188. Juergen Deppner, Marcelo Cajias. 2022. Accounting for Spatial Autocorrelation in Algorithm-Driven
Hedonic Models: A Spatial Cross-Validation Approach. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and
Economics 11. . [Crossref]
189. Anja Garbely, Elias Steiner. 2022. Understanding compliance with voluntary sustainability standards:
a machine learning approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability 26. . [Crossref]
190. Harold D. Chiang, Kengo Kato, Yukun Ma, Yuya Sasaki. 2022. Multiway Cluster Robust Double/
Debiased Machine Learning. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 40:3, 1046-1056. [Crossref]
191. Sathya Uma Lakshmi Kandasamy, Piyush Kumar Singh, Dillip Kumar Swain. 2022. Climate
change vulnerability assessment of dryland farmers and factors Identification using machine learning
techniques. Local Environment 27:7, 824-846. [Crossref]
192. Michael Bailey, Drew Johnston, Theresa Kuchler, Johannes Stroebel, Arlene Wong. 2022. Peer Effects
in Product Adoption. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 14:3, 488-526. [Abstract] [View
PDF article] [PDF with links]
193. Yang Wang, Hong Zhang, Libing Liu. 2022. Does city construction improve life quality?-evidence
from POI data of China. International Review of Economics & Finance 80, 643-653. [Crossref]
194. Samuel Bazzi, Robert A. Blair, Christopher Blattman, Oeindrila Dube, Matthew Gudgeon, Richard
Peck. 2022. The Promise and Pitfalls of Conflict Prediction: Evidence from Colombia and Indonesia.
The Review of Economics and Statistics 104:4, 764-779. [Crossref]
195. Sun-Youn Shin, Han-Gyun Woo. 2022. Energy Consumption Forecasting in Korea Using Machine
Learning Algorithms. Energies 15:13, 4880. [Crossref]
196. Sangjin Park, Jae-Suk Yang. 2022. Interpretable deep learning LSTM model for intelligent economic
decision-making. Knowledge-Based Systems 248, 108907. [Crossref]
197. Perry Sadorsky. 2022. Forecasting solar stock prices using tree-based machine learning classification:
How important are silver prices?. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance 61, 101705.
[Crossref]
198. Felix Lorenz, Jonas Willwersch, Marcelo Cajias, Franz Fuerst. 2022. Interpretable machine learning
for real estate market analysis. Real Estate Economics 37. . [Crossref]
199. Josip Franic. 2022. What do we really know about the drivers of undeclared work? An evaluation of
the current state of affairs using machine learning. AI & SOCIETY 1. . [Crossref]
200. Shixuan Tang. 2022. Applications of Machine Learning in the Industry of Healthcare. Highlights in
Science, Engineering and Technology 1, 87-96. [Crossref]
201. Mehmet Güney Celbiş. 2022. Unemployment in Rural Europe: A Machine Learning Perspective.
Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 42. . [Crossref]
202. Zeye Chen, Xin Xia. 2022. The Top-Level Design Strategy of “Curriculum Civics” in the New Era of
Universities Based on Machine Learning under the Perspective of Communication Science. Security
and Communication Networks 2022, 1-8. [Crossref]
203. Florian M. Artinger, Gerd Gigerenzer, Perke Jacobs. 2022. Satisficing: Integrating Two Traditions.
Journal of Economic Literature 60:2, 598-635. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
204. Raphael H. Heiberger. 2022. Applying Machine Learning in Sociology: How to Predict Gender
and Reveal Research Preferences. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 74:S1,
383-406. [Crossref]
205. P. Uday Ashish, Rashtra Vibhuti Sharma, Sindhu Hak Gupta, Asmita Rajawat. 2022. Classification
of limb movements using different predictive analysis algorithms. International Journal of System
Assurance Engineering and Management 13:3, 1385-1395. [Crossref]
206. Saqib Aziz, Michael Dowling, Helmi Hammami, Anke Piepenbrink. 2022. Machine learning in
finance: A topic modeling approach. European Financial Management 28:3, 744-770. [Crossref]
207. Nate Breznau. 2022. Integrating Computer Prediction Methods in Social Science: A Comment on
Hofman et al. (2021). Social Science Computer Review 40:3, 844-853. [Crossref]
208. Arne Steinkraus. 2022. Asking Why? – Das Spannungsfeld zwischen Ökonometrie und Data Science.
Wirtschaftsinformatik & Management 14:3, 186-191. [Crossref]
209. Monica Andini, Michela Boldrini, Emanuele Ciani, Guido de Blasio, Alessio D'Ignazio, Andrea
Paladini. 2022. Machine learning in the service of policy targeting: The case of public credit
guarantees. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 198, 434-475. [Crossref]
210. Brian Blankenship, Michaël Aklin, Johannes Urpelainen, Vagisha Nandan. 2022. Jobs for a just
transition: Evidence on coal job preferences from India. Energy Policy 165, 112910. [Crossref]
211. Lothar Walter, Nils M. Denter, Jan Kebel. 2022. A review on digitalization trends in patent
information databases and interrogation tools. World Patent Information 69, 102107. [Crossref]
212. Jason W. Miller, Travis Kulpa. 2022. Econometrics and archival data: Reflections for purchasing and
supply management (PSM) research. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 28:3, 100780.
[Crossref]
213. Alexandre Rubesam. 2022. Machine learning portfolios with equal risk contributions: Evidence from
the Brazilian market. Emerging Markets Review 51, 100891. [Crossref]
214. Pushpendra Rana, Forrest Fleischman, Vijay Ramprasad, Kangjae Lee. 2022. Predicting wasteful
spending in tree planting programs in Indian Himalaya. World Development 154, 105864. [Crossref]
215. Ran Liu. 2022. Leveraging machine learning methods to estimate heterogeneous effects: father
absence in China as an example. Chinese Sociological Review 54:3, 223-251. [Crossref]
216. Samira Bounid, Mohammed Oughanem, Salman Bourkadi. Advanced Financial Data Processing and
Labeling Methods for Machine Learning 1-6. [Crossref]
217. Boubacar Diallo. 2022. Machine learning approaches to testing institutional hypotheses: the case of
Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson (2001). Empirical Economics 62:5, 2587-2600. [Crossref]
218. Mustafa Savci, Ahmet Tekin, Jon D. Elhai. 2022. Prediction of problematic social media use (PSU)
using machine learning approaches. Current Psychology 41:5, 2755-2764. [Crossref]
219. Matteo Alpino, Karen Evelyn Hauge, Andreas Kotsadam, Simen Markussen. 2022. Effects of dialogue
meetings on sickness absence—Evidence from a large field experiment. Journal of Health Economics
83, 102615. [Crossref]
220. Keita Abe, Christopher M. Anderson. 2022. A Dynamic Model of Endogenous Fishing Duration.
Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 9:3, 425-454. [Crossref]
221. MIAO LIU. 2022. Assessing Human Information Processing in Lending Decisions: A Machine
Learning Approach. Journal of Accounting Research 60:2, 607-651. [Crossref]
222. XI CHEN, YANG HA (TONY) CHO, YIWEI DOU, BARUCH LEV. 2022. Predicting Future
Earnings Changes Using Machine Learning and Detailed Financial Data. Journal of Accounting
223. Joey Blumberg, Gary Thompson. 2022. Nonparametric segmentation methods: Applications of
unsupervised machine learning and revealed preference. American Journal of Agricultural Economics
104:3, 976-998. [Crossref]
224. Yang Yi, Le Wen, Shan He. 2022. Partitioning for “Common but Differentiated” Precise Air Pollution
Governance: A Combined Machine Learning and Spatial Econometric Approach. Energies 15:9, 3346.
[Crossref]
225. Valentas Gružauskas, Aurelija Burinskienė. 2022. Managing Supply Chain Complexity and
Sustainability: The Case of the Food Industry. Processes 10:5, 852. [Crossref]
226. Pierre-Philippe Combes, Laurent Gobillon, Yanos Zylberberg. 2022. Urban economics in a historical
perspective: Recovering data with machine learning. Regional Science and Urban Economics 94, 103711.
[Crossref]
227. Eric Yanfei Zhao. Optimal Distinctiveness 31, . [Crossref]
228. Sendhil Mullainathan, Ziad Obermeyer. 2022. Diagnosing Physician Error: A Machine Learning
Approach to Low-Value Health Care. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 137:2, 679-727. [Crossref]
229. Steve J. Bickley, Ho Fai Chan, Benno Torgler. 2022. Artificial intelligence in the field of economics.
Scientometrics 127:4, 2055-2084. [Crossref]
230. Shinya Sugawara. 2022. What composes desirable formal at-home elder care? An analysis for multiple
service combinations. The Japanese Economic Review 73:2, 373-402. [Crossref]
231. Khaled Obaid, Kuntara Pukthuanthong. 2022. A picture is worth a thousand words: Measuring
investor sentiment by combining machine learning and photos from news. Journal of Financial
Economics 144:1, 273-297. [Crossref]
232. Satish Chand, Yu Zhang. 2022. Learning from machines to close the gap between funding
and expenditure in the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme. International Journal of
Information Management Data Insights 2:1, 100077. [Crossref]
233. Joshua D. Angrist, Brigham Frandsen. 2022. Machine Labor. Journal of Labor Economics 40:S1, S97-
S140. [Crossref]
234. Kim Anh Thi Nguyen, Tram Anh Thi Nguyen, Brice M. Nguelifack, Curtis M. Jolly. 2022. Machine
Learning Approaches for Predicting Willingness to Pay for Shrimp Insurance in Vietnam. Marine
Resource Economics 37:2, 155-182. [Crossref]
235. Gonul Colak, Mengchuan Fu, Iftekhar Hasan. 2022. On modeling IPO failure risk. Economic
Modelling 109, 105790. [Crossref]
236. Manivel Murugan, Sankaran Marisamynathan. 2022. Mode shift behaviour and user willingness to
adopt the electric two-wheeler: A study based on Indian road user preferences. International Journal
of Transportation Science and Technology 16. . [Crossref]
237. S. Surya, Sumeet Gupta, Abolfazl Mehbodniya, Jeidy Panduro-Ramirez, Prabhakara Rao Kapula,
Tanweer Alam, Karthikeyan Kaliyaperumal. 2022. Addressing the Real World Problem of Managing
Wireless Communication Systems Using Explainable AI-Based Models through Correlation Analysis.
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2022, 1-6. [Crossref]
238. Rani Nooraeni, Jimmy Nickelson, Eko Rahmadian, Nugroho Puspito Yudho. 2022. New
recommendation to predict export value using big data and machine learning technique. Statistical
Journal of the IAOS 38:1, 277-290. [Crossref]
239. Michael Greenstone, Guojun He, Ruixue Jia, Tong Liu. 2022. Can Technology Solve the Principal-
Agent Problem? Evidence from China’s War on Air Pollution. American Economic Review: Insights 4:1,
54-70. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
240. Avinash Kaur, Parminder Singh, Ranbir Singh Batth, Chee Peng Lim. 2022. Deep‐Q learning‐based
heterogeneous earliest finish time scheduling algorithm for scientific workflows in cloud. Software:
Practice and Experience 52:3, 689-709. [Crossref]
241. Md Anisur Rahman, Mirko Duradoni, Andrea Guazzini. 2022. Identification and prediction of
phubbing behavior: a data-driven approach. Neural Computing and Applications 34:5, 3885-3894.
[Crossref]
242. Yicai Huang, Jiayuan Chen, Qiannan Duan, Yunjin Feng, Run Luo, Wenjing Wang, Fenli Liu,
Sifan Bi, Jianchao Lee. 2022. A fast antibiotic detection method for simplified pretreatment through
spectra-based machine learning. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering 16:3. . [Crossref]
243. Nidhi Rajesh Mavani, Jarinah Mohd Ali, Suhaili Othman, M. A. Hussain, Haslaniza Hashim,
Norliza Abd Rahman. 2022. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Food Industry—a Guideline. Food
Engineering Reviews 14:1, 134-175. [Crossref]
244. Helmut Wasserbacher, Martin Spindler. 2022. Machine learning for financial forecasting, planning
and analysis: recent developments and pitfalls. Digital Finance 4:1, 63-88. [Crossref]
245. Takuya Takata, Hajime Sasaki, Hiroko Yamano, Masashi Honma, Mayumi Shikano. 2022. Study
on Horizon Scanning with a Focus on the Development of AI-Based Medical Products: Citation
Network Analysis. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science 56:2, 263-275. [Crossref]
246. Joshua O. S. Hunt, James N. Myers, Linda A. Myers. 2022. Improving Earnings Predictions and
Abnormal Returns with Machine Learning. Accounting Horizons 36:1, 131-149. [Crossref]
247. Florian Wozny. 2022. The Impact of COVID-19 on Airfares—A Machine Learning Counterfactual
Analysis. Econometrics 10:1, 8. [Crossref]
248. Jan Abrell, Mirjam Kosch, Sebastian Rausch. 2022. How effective is carbon pricing?—A machine
learning approach to policy evaluation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 112,
102589. [Crossref]
249. Ranik Raaen Wahlstrøm, Florentina Paraschiv, Michael Schürle. 2022. A Comparative Analysis of
Parsimonious Yield Curve Models with Focus on the Nelson-Siegel, Svensson and Bliss Versions.
Computational Economics 59:3, 967-1004. [Crossref]
250. Haiming Feng, Ye Zhao, Weijian Yan, Xiaoping Wei, Junping Lin, Peng Jiang, Cheng Wang, Bin Li.
2022. Identification of Signature Genes and Characterizations of Tumor Immune Microenvironment
and Tumor Purity in Lung Adenocarcinoma Based on Machine Learning. Frontiers in Medicine 9. .
[Crossref]
251. Vedant Bhardwaj, Param Bhavsar, Debasis Patnaik. Forecasting GDP per capita of OECD countries
using machine learning and deep learning models 1-6. [Crossref]
252. A. V. L. N. Sujith, Naila Iqbal Qureshi, Venkata Harshavardhan Reddy Dornadula, Abinash Rath,
Kolla Bhanu Prakash, Sitesh Kumar Singh. 2022. A Comparative Analysis of Business Machine
Learning in Making Effective Financial Decisions Using Structural Equation Model (SEM). Journal
of Food Quality 2022, 1-7. [Crossref]
253. Ti-Ching Peng, Chun-Chieh Wang. 2022. The Application of Machine Learning Approaches on
Real-Time Apartment Prices in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area. Social Science Japan Journal 25:1,
3-28. [Crossref]
254. Jieying Gao, Huan Guo, Xin Xu. 2022. Multifactor Stock Selection Strategy Based on Machine
Learning: Evidence from China. Complexity 2022, 1-17. [Crossref]
255. Morgan Henderson, Fei Han, Chad Perman, Howard Haft, Ian Stockwell. 2022. Predicting avoidable
hospital events in Maryland. Health Services Research 57:1, 192-199. [Crossref]
256. ANDREAS FUSTER, PAUL GOLDSMITH‐PINKHAM, TARUN RAMADORAI, ANSGAR
WALTHER. 2022. Predictably Unequal? The Effects of Machine Learning on Credit Markets. The
Journal of Finance 77:1, 5-47. [Crossref]
257. Miaoying Shi, Jintao Xu, Shilei Liu, Zhenci Xu. 2022. Productivity-Based Land Suitability and
Management Sensitivity Analysis: The Eucalyptus E. urophylla × E. grandis Case. Forests 13:2, 340.
[Crossref]
258. Gema Sakti Raspati, Stian Bruaset, Camillo Bosco, Lars Mushom, Birgitte Johannessen, Rita Ugarelli.
2022. A Risk-Based Approach in Rehabilitation of Water Distribution Networks. International Journal
of Environmental Research and Public Health 19:3, 1594. [Crossref]
259. Abdus Samad Azad, Rajalingam Sokkalingam, Hanita Daud, Sajal Kumar Adhikary, Hifsa Khurshid,
Siti Nur Athirah Mazlan, Muhammad Babar Ali Rabbani. 2022. Water Level Prediction through
Hybrid SARIMA and ANN Models Based on Time Series Analysis: Red Hills Reservoir Case Study.
Sustainability 14:3, 1843. [Crossref]
260. Jason Chun Yu Wong, Brian Blankenship, Johannes Urpelainen, Kanika Balani, Karthik Ganesan,
Kapardhi Bharadwaj. 2022. Understanding electricity billing preferences in rural and urban India:
Evidence from a conjoint experiment. Energy Economics 106, 105735. [Crossref]
261. Steffen Kinkel, Marco Baumgartner, Enrica Cherubini. 2022. Prerequisites for the adoption of AI
technologies in manufacturing – Evidence from a worldwide sample of manufacturing companies.
Technovation 110, 102375. [Crossref]
262. Thaynã França, Arthur Martins Barbosa Braga, Helon Vicente Hultmann Ayala. 2022. Feature
engineering to cope with noisy data in sparse identification. Expert Systems with Applications 188,
115995. [Crossref]
263. Dweepobotee Brahma, Debasri Mukherjee. 2022. Early warning signs: targeting neonatal and infant
mortality using machine learning. Applied Economics 54:1, 57-74. [Crossref]
264. Philipp Kugler. 2022. The role of wage beliefs in the decision to become a nurse. Health Economics
31:1, 94-111. [Crossref]
265. Gareth Macartney. Econometrics in Litigation: Challenges at Class Certification 311-346. [Crossref]
266. Jingyi Qiu. Data Selection and Machine Learning Algorithm Application Under the Background of
Big Data 96-103. [Crossref]
267. Daniel Hain, Roman Jurowetzki. Introduction to Rare-Event Predictive Modeling for Inferential
Statisticians—A Hands-On Application in the Prediction of Breakthrough Patents 49-83. [Crossref]
268. Yinping Ji, Deepmala Karki. Construction of a Personalized English Learning System Based on
Machine Learning 503-510. [Crossref]
269. Bui Thanh Khoa, Ho Nhat Anh, Nguyen Minh Ly, Nguyen Xuan Truong. A Study on Buying
Attitude on Facebook in the Digital Transformation Era: A Machine Learning Application 497-510.
[Crossref]
270. Bui Thanh Khoa, Nguyen Thi Trang Oanh, Vo Thi Thao Uyen, Dang Cuu Hanh Dung. Customer
Loyalty in the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Application of Machine Learning in Survey Data 419-429.
[Crossref]
271. Zhigang Qiu, Xiaolin Huo, Yue Dai. Development of FinTech in Academia 71-84. [Crossref]
272. Dieudonné Tchuente, Serge Nyawa. 2022. Real estate price estimation in French cities using geocoding
and machine learning. Annals of Operations Research 308:1-2, 571-608. [Crossref]
273. Hans Visser, Niels Evers, Arjan Bontsema, Jasmijn Rost, Arie de Niet, Paul Vethman, Sido Mylius,
Annelotte van der Linden, Joost van den Roovaart, Frank van Gaalen, Roel Knoben, Hendrika J. de
Lange. 2022. What drives the ecological quality of surface waters? A review of 11 predictive modeling
tools. Water Research 208, 117851. [Crossref]
274. Abigail R. Cartus, Ashley I. Naimi, Katherine P. Himes, Marian Jarlenski, Sara M. Parisi, Lisa M.
Bodnar. 2022. Can Ensemble Machine Learning Improve the Accuracy of Severe Maternal Morbidity
Screening in a Perinatal Database?. Epidemiology 33:1, 95-104. [Crossref]
275. Li-Chin Chen, Ji-Tian Sheu, Yuh-Jue Chuang, Yu Tsao. 2022. Predicting the Travel Distance
of Patients to Access Healthcare Using Deep Neural Networks. IEEE Journal of Translational
Engineering in Health and Medicine 10, 1-11. [Crossref]
276. Simone Plak, Ilja Cornelisz, Martijn Meeter, Chris Klaveren. 2022. Early warning systems for more
effective student counselling in higher education: Evidence from a Dutch field experiment. Higher
Education Quarterly 76:1, 131-152. [Crossref]
277. Mark D. Verhagen. 2022. A Pragmatist’s Guide to Using Prediction in the Social Sciences. Socius:
Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 8, 237802312210817. [Crossref]
278. Montserrat González Garibay, Andrej Srakar, Tjaša Bartolj, Jože Sambt. 2022. Does Machine
Learning Offer Added Value Vis-à-Vis Traditional Statistics? An Exploratory Study on Retirement
Decisions Using Data from the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).
Mathematics 10:1, 152. [Crossref]
279. M. EMEC, M. H. OZCANHAN. 2022. A Hybrid Deep Learning Approach for Intrusion Detection
in IoT Networks. Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering 22:1, 3-12. [Crossref]
280. Benjamin Bluhm, Jannic Alexander Cutura. 2022. Econometrics at Scale: Spark up Big Data in
Economics. Journal of Data Science 49, 413-436. [Crossref]
281. Emilio Lehoucq. 2022. Do Americans Think the Digital Economy is Fair? Using Supervised Learning
to Explore Evaluations of Predictive Automation. Journal of Data Science 35, 381-399. [Crossref]
282. Baojun Yu, Changming Li, Nawazish Mirza, Muhammad Umar. 2022. Forecasting credit ratings of
decarbonized firms: Comparative assessment of machine learning models. Technological Forecasting
and Social Change 174, 121255. [Crossref]
283. Augusto Cerqua, Marco Letta. 2022. Local inequalities of the COVID-19 crisis. Regional Science and
Urban Economics 92, 103752. [Crossref]
284. Gianluca Gabrielli, Alice Medioli, Paolo Andrei. 2022. Accounting and Big Data: Trends,
opportunities and direction for practitioners and researchers. FINANCIAL REPORTING :2, 89-112.
[Crossref]
285. Béatrice Boulu-Reshef. Possible in Economics 1096-1103. [Crossref]
286. Zheng Li, Bo Zhou, David A. Hensher. 2022. Forecasting automobile gasoline demand in Australia
using machine learning-based regression. Energy 239, 122312. [Crossref]
287. S. Karthik, Robin Singh Bhadoria, Jeong Gon Lee, Arun Kumar Sivaraman, Sovan Samanta, A.
Balasundaram, Brijesh Kumar Chaurasia, S. Ashokkumar. 2022. Prognostic Kalman Filter Based
Bayesian Learning Model for Data Accuracy Prediction. Computers, Materials & Continua 72:1,
243-259. [Crossref]
288. Philipp Adämmer, Rainer Alexander Schüssler. 2022. Detecting the Sparsity Levels of
Economic Time Series: On the Impact of Noise. SSRN Electronic Journal 19. . [Crossref]
289. Luca Coraggio, Marco Pagano, Annalisa Scognamiglio, Joacim Tåg. 2022. JAQ of All Trades: Job
Mismatch, Firm Productivity and Managerial Quality. SSRN Electronic Journal 101. . [Crossref]
290. Falco Bargagli Stoffi, Massimo Riccaboni, Armando Rungi. 2022. Machine Learning for Zombie
Hunting: Predicting Distress from Firms' Accounts and Missing Values. SSRN Electronic Journal
83. . [Crossref]
291. Yacine Ait-Sahalia, Jianqing Fan, Lirong Xue, Yifeng Zhou. 2022. How and When are High-
Frequency Stock Returns Predictable?. SSRN Electronic Journal 217. . [Crossref]
292. Wei Chien Ng, Yu Qing Soong, Sin Yin Teh. Machine Learning in Food Security and Sustainability
1-17. [Crossref]
293. Elliott Isaac, Haibin Jiang. 2022. Tax-Based Marriage Incentives in the Affordable Care Act. SSRN
Electronic Journal 48. . [Crossref]
294. Kathleen Li, Christophe Van den Bulte. 2022. Augmented Difference-in-Differences. SSRN Electronic
Journal 59. . [Crossref]
295. Emanuel Kohlscheen, Richhild Moessner. 2022. Changing Electricity Markets: Quantifying the Price
Effects of Greening the Energy Matrix. SSRN Electronic Journal 31. . [Crossref]
296. Jens Ludwig, Sendhil Mullainathan. 2022. Algorithmic Behavioral Science: Machine Learning as a
Tool for Scientific Discovery. SSRN Electronic Journal 18. . [Crossref]
297. Marcelin Joanis, Andrea Lodi, Igor Sadoune. 2022. On Deep Generative Modeling in Economics: An
Application with Public Procurement Data. SSRN Electronic Journal 31. . [Crossref]
298. Yacine Ait-Sahalia, Jianqing Fan, Lirong Xue, Yifeng Zhou. 2022. How and When are High-
Frequency Stock Returns Predictable?. SSRN Electronic Journal 217. . [Crossref]
299. William Cochrane, Jacques Poot, Matthew James Roskruge. 2022. Urban Resilience and Social
Security Uptake: New Zealand Evidence from the Global Financial Crisis and the COVID-19
Pandemic. SSRN Electronic Journal 20. . [Crossref]
300. Andreas Born, Aljoscha Janssen. 2022. Does a district mandate matter for the behavior of politicians?
An analysis of roll-call votes and parliamentary speeches. European Journal of Political Economy 71,
102070. [Crossref]
301. Richard M. Crowley, M.H. Franco Wong. 2022. Understanding Sentiment Through Context. SSRN
302. Veli Andirin, Yusuf Neggers, Mehdi Shadmehr, Jesse Shapiro. 2022. Measuring the Tolerance of the
State: Theory and Application to Protest. SSRN Electronic Journal 96. . [Crossref]
303. Chun-Cheng Wei, Li Sun, Shih-Pang Tseng. The Demand Analysis and Forecast of APP-based Taxi
Service via Machine Learning 1-3. [Crossref]
304. İlhan KOYUNCU, Abdullah Faruk KILIÇ. 2021. Classification of Scale Items with Exploratory Graph
Analysis and Machine Learning Methods. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education 8:4,
928-947. [Crossref]
305. Francesco Bloise, Paolo Brunori, Patrizio Piraino. 2021. Estimating intergenerational income mobility
on sub-optimal data: a machine learning approach. The Journal of Economic Inequality 19:4, 643-665.
[Crossref]
306. Furkan Kartal, Uğur Özveren. 2021. An improved machine learning approach to estimate
hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin in biomass. Carbohydrate Polymer Technologies and Applications 2,
100148. [Crossref]
307. Martin Hirche, Paul W. Farris, Luke Greenacre, Yiran Quan, Susan Wei. 2021. Predicting Under-
and Overperforming SKUs within the Distribution–Market Share Relationship. Journal of Retailing
97:4, 697-714. [Crossref]
308. Onder Ozgur, Erdal Tanas Karagol, Fatih Cemil Ozbugday. 2021. Machine learning approach to
drivers of bank lending: evidence from an emerging economy. Financial Innovation 7:1. . [Crossref]
309. Mudabbir Ali, Asad Masood Khattak, Zain Ali, Bashir Hayat, Muhammad Idrees, Zeeshan Pervez,
Kashif Rizwan, Tae-Eung Sung, Ki-Il Kim. 2021. Estimation and Interpretation of Machine Learning
Models with Customized Surrogate Model. Electronics 10:23, 3045. [Crossref]
310. Jungsun Kim, Jaewoong Won, Hyeongsoon Kim, Joonghyeok Heo. 2021. Machine-Learning-Based
Prediction of Land Prices in Seoul, South Korea. Sustainability 13:23, 13088. [Crossref]
311. Mehmet Güney Celbiş, Pui-Hang Wong, Karima Kourtit, Peter Nijkamp. 2021. Innovativeness,
Work Flexibility, and Place Characteristics: A Spatial Econometric and Machine Learning Approach.
Sustainability 13:23, 13426. [Crossref]
312. Wenjing Lyu, Jin Liu. 2021. Artificial Intelligence and emerging digital technologies in the energy
sector. Applied Energy 303, 117615. [Crossref]
313. Jiaming Zhang, Zhanfeng Li, Xinyuan Song, Hanwen Ning. 2021. Deep Tobit networks: A novel
machine learning approach to microeconometrics. Neural Networks 144, 279-296. [Crossref]
314. Antonio Rodríguez Andrés, Abraham Otero, Voxi Heinrich Amavilah. 2021. Using deep learning
neural networks to predict the knowledge economy index for developing and emerging economies.
Expert Systems with Applications 184, 115514. [Crossref]
315. Guan-Yuan Wang. 2021. The Brand Effect: A Case Study in Taiwan Second-Hand Smartphone
Market. Journal of Social and Economic Statistics 10:1-2, 30-42. [Crossref]
316. Zach Warner, J. Andrew Harris, Michelle Brown, Christian Arnold. 2021. Hidden in plain sight?
Irregularities on statutory forms and electoral fraud. Electoral Studies 74, 102411. [Crossref]
317. Maja Micevska. 2021. Revisiting forced migration: A machine learning perspective. European Journal
of Political Economy 70, 102044. [Crossref]
318. Steven Lehrer, Tian Xie, Tao Zeng. 2021. Does High-Frequency Social Media Data Improve
Forecasts of Low-Frequency Consumer Confidence Measures?. Journal of Financial Econometrics 19:5,
910-933. [Crossref]
319. Deon Filmer, Vatsal Nahata, Shwetlena Sabarwal. Preparation, Practice, and Beliefs: A Machine
Learning Approach to Understanding Teacher Effectiveness 1, . [Crossref]
320. Sree Teja Buddaraju, Ananya Bardhan, Ramya Sri Boddu, Simranjit Kaur, Thangarajah Akilan.
Remote Sensing-based Socioeconomic Analysis using Task-driven Transfer Learning and Regression
1-7. [Crossref]
321. Chengge Wu. Empowering Financial Technical Analysis using Computer Vision Techniques 179-184.
[Crossref]
322. Alessandra Garbero, Bia Carneiro, Giuliano Resce. 2021. Harnessing the power of machine learning
analytics to understand food systems dynamics across development projects. Technological Forecasting
and Social Change 172, 121012. [Crossref]
323. Javier Ortega-Bastida, Antonio Javier Gallego, Juan Ramón Rico-Juan, Pedro Albarrán. 2021.
A multimodal approach for regional GDP prediction using social media activity and historical
information. Applied Soft Computing 111, 107693. [Crossref]
324. Mehmet Güney CELBİŞ. 2021. Social Networks, Female Unemployment, and the Urban-Rural
Divide in Turkey: Evidence from Tree-Based Machine Learning Algorithms. Sosyoekonomi 29:50,
73-93. [Crossref]
325. Stelios Michalopoulos, Melanie Meng Xue. 2021. Folklore. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 136:4,
1993-2046. [Crossref]
326. Matthew C. Harding, Carlos Lamarche. 2021. Small Steps with Big Data: Using Machine Learning in
Energy and Environmental Economics. Annual Review of Resource Economics 13:1, 469-488. [Crossref]
327. Bryan Kelly, Asaf Manela, Alan Moreira. 2021. Text Selection. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics
39:4, 859-879. [Crossref]
328. Prodosh E. Simlai. 2021. Predicting owner-occupied housing values using machine learning: an
empirical investigation of California census tracts data. Journal of Property Research 38:4, 305-336.
[Crossref]
329. Yonghui Dai, Tao Wang. 2021. Prediction of customer engagement behaviour response to marketing
posts based on machine learning. Connection Science 33:4, 891-910. [Crossref]
330. Francesco Decarolis, Gabriele Rovigatti. 2021. From Mad Men to Maths Men: Concentration and
Buyer Power in Online Advertising. American Economic Review 111:10, 3299-3327. [Abstract] [View
331. Jesús Gonzalo, Jean-Yves Pitarakis. 2021. Spurious relationships in high-dimensional systems with
strong or mild persistence. International Journal of Forecasting 37:4, 1480-1497. [Crossref]
332. Seyedehmaryam Moosavi, Otilia Manta, Yaser A. El-Badry, Enas E. Hussein, Zeinhom M. El-Bahy,
Noor fariza Binti Mohd Fawzi, Jaunius Urbonavičius, Seyed Mohammad Hossein Moosavi. 2021. A
Study on Machine Learning Methods’ Application for Dye Adsorption Prediction onto Agricultural
Waste Activated Carbon. Nanomaterials 11:10, 2734. [Crossref]
333. Muhammad Ali Musarat, Wesam Salah Alaloul, Muhammad Babar Ali Rabbani, Mujahid Ali,
Muhammad Altaf, Roman Fediuk, Nikolai Vatin, Sergey Klyuev, Hamna Bukhari, Alishba Sadiq,
Waqas Rafiq, Waqas Farooq. 2021. Kabul River Flow Prediction Using Automated ARIMA
Forecasting: A Machine Learning Approach. Sustainability 13:19, 10720. [Crossref]
334. Keith Leavitt, Kira Schabram, Prashanth Hariharan, Christopher M. Barnes. 2021. Ghost in the
Machine: On Organizational Theory in the Age of Machine Learning. Academy of Management Review
46:4, 750-777. [Crossref]
335. Heather A. Haveman, Joseph T. Mahoney, Elizabeth Mannix. 2021. The Evolving Science of
Organization: Theory Matters. Academy of Management Review 46:4, 660-666. [Crossref]
336. Vitor Miguel Ribeiro. 2021. Sulfur dioxide emissions in Portugal: Prediction, estimation and air
quality regulation using machine learning. Journal of Cleaner Production 317, 128358. [Crossref]
337. M. Salti, E.E. Kangal, O. Aydogdu. 2021. Evolution of CMB temperature in a Chaplygin gas model
from deep learning perspective. Astronomy and Computing 37, 100504. [Crossref]
338. David Bholat, Daniel Susskind. 2021. The assessment: artificial intelligence and financial services.
Oxford Review of Economic Policy 37:3, 417-434. [Crossref]
339. Bonnie G Buchanan, Danika Wright. 2021. The impact of machine learning on UK financial services.
Oxford Review of Economic Policy 37:3, 537-563. [Crossref]
340. Giovanni Cerulli. 2021. Improving econometric prediction by machine learning. Applied Economics
Letters 28:16, 1419-1425. [Crossref]
341. Ebru Tomris AYDOĞAN, Esra KARADENİZ, Mehmet Güney CELBİŞ. 2021. Türkiye’de
Girişimcilik ve Sürdürülebilir Bölgesel Kalkınma: Makine Öğrenmesi Yaklaşımlarından Elde Edilen
Bulgular. Ekonomi, Politika & Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi 6:3, 882-911. [Crossref]
342. Hing Ling Chan, Minling Pan. 2021. Fishing trip cost modeling using generalized linear model and
machine learning methods – A case study with longline fisheries in the Pacific and an application in
Regulatory Impact Analysis. PLOS ONE 16:9, e0257027. [Crossref]
343. Dragos-Cristian Vasilescu, Michael Filzmoser. 2021. Machine invention systems: a (r)evolution of the
invention process?. AI & SOCIETY 36:3, 829-837. [Crossref]
344. Joshua O.S. Hunt, David M. Rosser, Stephen P. Rowe. 2021. Using machine learning to predict
auditor switches: How the likelihood of switching affects audit quality among non-switching clients.
Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 40:5, 106785. [Crossref]
345. Virgilio Galdo, Yue Li, Martin Rama. 2021. Identifying urban areas by combining human judgment
and machine learning: An application to India. Journal of Urban Economics 125, 103229. [Crossref]
346. Feras A. Batarseh, Munisamy Gopinath, Anderson Monken, Zhengrong Gu. 2021. Public
policymaking for international agricultural trade using association rules and ensemble machine
learning. Machine Learning with Applications 5, 100046. [Crossref]
347. Yaohao Peng, Pedro Henrique Melo Albuquerque, Herbert Kimura, Cayan Atreio Portela Bárcena
Saavedra. 2021. Feature selection and deep neural networks for stock price direction forecasting using
technical analysis indicators. Machine Learning with Applications 5, 100060. [Crossref]
348. Shiho Kino, Yu-Tien Hsu, Koichiro Shiba, Yung-Shin Chien, Carol Mita, Ichiro Kawachi, Adel
Daoud. 2021. A scoping review on the use of machine learning in research on social determinants of
health: Trends and research prospects. SSM - Population Health 15, 100836. [Crossref]
349. Frederick Andrés Mendoza-Lozano, Jose Wilmar Quintero-Peña, Oscar Leonardo Acevedo-Pabón,
Jose Félix García-Rodríguez. 2021. Fundamentación teórica para la creación de un programa académico
de ingeniería y ciencia de datos: una aplicación bibliométrica. Aibi revista de investigación, administración
e ingeniería 9:3, 49-58. [Crossref]
350. Rafael Quintana. 2021. Who Belongs in School? Using Statistical Learning Techniques to Identify
Linear, Nonlinear and Interactive Effects. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology 17:3, 312-328.
[Crossref]
351. James T. Bang, Atin Basuchoudhary, Aniruddha Mitra. 2021. Validating Game-Theoretic Models of
Terrorism: Insights from Machine Learning. Games 12:3, 54. [Crossref]
352. Ka Shing Cheung, Julian TszKin Chan, Sijie Li, Chung Yim Yiu. 2021. Anchoring and Asymmetric
Information in the Real Estate Market: A Machine Learning Approach. Journal of Risk and Financial
Management 14:9, 423. [Crossref]
353. Mohamed Elhag Mohamed Abo, Norisma Idris, Rohana Mahmud, Atika Qazi, Ibrahim Abaker
Targio Hashem, Jaafar Zubairu Maitama, Usman Naseem, Shah Khalid Khan, Shuiqing Yang. 2021.
A Multi-Criteria Approach for Arabic Dialect Sentiment Analysis for Online Reviews: Exploiting
Optimal Machine Learning Algorithm Selection. Sustainability 13:18, 10018. [Crossref]
354. Ruixin Liang, Joanne Yip, Winnie Yu, Lihua Chen, Newman Lau. 2021. Finite Element-Based
Machine Learning Method to Predict Breast Displacement during Running. AATCC Journal of
Research 8:1_suppl, 69-74. [Crossref]
355. Mengying Shang, Yonghua Zhou, Hamido Fujita. 2021. Deep reinforcement learning with reference
system to handle constraints for energy-efficient train control. Information Sciences 570, 708-721.
[Crossref]
356. Alexandre Godzinski, Milena Suarez Castillo. 2021. Disentangling the effects of air pollutants with
many instruments. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 109, 102489. [Crossref]
357. Akash Malhotra. 2021. A hybrid econometric–machine learning approach for relative importance
analysis: prioritizing food policy. Eurasian Economic Review 11:3, 549-581. [Crossref]
358. Christoph Breunig, Iuliia Grabova, Peter Haan, Felix Weinhardt, Georg Weizsäcker. 2021. Long-run
expectations of households. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 31, 100535. [Crossref]
359. Claire S.H. Lim, James M. Snyder. 2021. What Shapes the Quality and Behavior of Government
Officials? Institutional Variation in Selection and Retention Methods. Annual Review of Economics
13:1, 87-109. [Crossref]
360. Tiffany Jiang. 2021. Using Machine Learning to Analyze Merger Activity. Frontiers in Applied
Mathematics and Statistics 7. . [Crossref]
361. Molly McCann-Pineo, Julia Ruskin, Rehana Rasul, Eugene Vortsman, Kristin Bevilacqua, Samantha
S. Corley, Rebecca M. Schwartz. 2021. Predictors of emergency department opioid administration and
prescribing: A machine learning approach. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 46, 217-224.
[Crossref]
362. Marja-Liisa Halko, Olli Lappalainen, Lauri Sääksvuori. 2021. Do non-choice data reveal economic
preferences? Evidence from biometric data and compensation-scheme choice. Journal of Economic
Behavior & Organization 188, 87-104. [Crossref]
363. Sugato Chakravarty, Douglas J. Cumming, Samuele Murtinu, Vittoria G. Scalera, Christian Schwens.
2021. Exploring the next generation of international entrepreneurship. Journal of World Business 56:5,
101229. [Crossref]
364. Mehmet Güney Celbiş. 2021. A machine learning approach to rural entrepreneurship. Papers in
Regional Science 100:4, 1079-1104. [Crossref]
365. Paola Bertoli, Veronica Grembi. 2021. Territorial differences in access to prenatal care and health at
birth. Health Policy 125:8, 1092-1099. [Crossref]
366. Andreu Arenas, Caterina Calsamiglia, Annalisa Loviglio. 2021. What is at stake without high-stakes
exams? Students’ evaluation and admission to college at the time of COVID-19. Economics of Education
Review 83, 102143. [Crossref]
367. Misuk Kim. 2021. Adaptive trading system integrating machine learning and back-testing: Korean
bond market case. Expert Systems with Applications 176, 114767. [Crossref]
368. Levi Altringer, Jordan Navin, Michael J. Begier, Stephanie A. Shwiff, Aaron Anderson. 2021.
Estimating wildlife strike costs at US airports: A machine learning approach. Transportation Research
Part D: Transport and Environment 97, 102907. [Crossref]
369. Praphula Kumar Jain, Rajendra Pamula, Gautam Srivastava. 2021. A systematic literature review on
machine learning applications for consumer sentiment analysis using online reviews. Computer Science
Review 41, 100413. [Crossref]
370. Dong-sup Kim, Seungwoo Shin. 2021. THE ECONOMIC EXPLAINABILITY OF MACHINE
LEARNING AND STANDARD ECONOMETRIC MODELS-AN APPLICATION TO THE
U.S. MORTGAGE DEFAULT RISK. International Journal of Strategic Property Management 25:5,
396-412. [Crossref]
371. Jian Chen, Ani L. Katchova, Chenxi Zhou. 2021. Agricultural loan delinquency prediction using
machine learning methods. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 24:5, 797-812.
[Crossref]
372. Jake M. Hofman, Duncan J. Watts, Susan Athey, Filiz Garip, Thomas L. Griffiths, Jon Kleinberg,
Helen Margetts, Sendhil Mullainathan, Matthew J. Salganik, Simine Vazire, Alessandro Vespignani,
Tal Yarkoni. 2021. Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science. Nature
595:7866, 181-188. [Crossref]
373. Luca Barbaglia, Sebastiano Manzan, Elisa Tosetti. 2021. Forecasting Loan Default in Europe with
Machine Learning. Journal of Financial Econometrics 29. . [Crossref]
374. Devesh Raval, Ted Rosenbaum, Nathan E. Wilson. 2021. How do machine learning algorithms
perform in predicting hospital choices? evidence from changing environments. Journal of Health
Economics 78, 102481. [Crossref]
375. Ronald Richman. 2021. AI in actuarial science – a review of recent advances – part 1. Annals of Actuarial
Science 15:2, 207-229. [Crossref]
376. Mark Musumba, Naureen Fatema, Shahriar Kibriya. 2021. Prevention Is Better Than Cure:
Machine Learning Approach to Conflict Prediction in Sub-Saharan Africa. Sustainability 13:13, 7366.
[Crossref]
377. Benjamin Lucas, R. Elena Francu, James Goulding, John Harvey, Georgiana Nica-Avram, Bertrand
Perrat. 2021. A Note on Data-driven Actor-differentiation and SDGs 2 and 12: Insights from a Food-
sharing App. Research Policy 50:6, 104266. [Crossref]
378. Ya Chen, Mike G. Tsionas, Valentin Zelenyuk. 2021. LASSO+DEA for small and big wide data.
Omega 102, 102419. [Crossref]
379. David Easley, Marcos López de Prado, Maureen O’Hara, Zhibai Zhang. 2021. Microstructure in the
Machine Age. The Review of Financial Studies 34:7, 3316-3363. [Crossref]
380. Itay Goldstein, Chester S Spatt, Mao Ye. 2021. Big Data in Finance. The Review of Financial Studies
34:7, 3213-3225. [Crossref]
381. Isil Erel, Léa H Stern, Chenhao Tan, Michael S Weisbach. 2021. Selecting Directors Using Machine
Learning. The Review of Financial Studies 34:7, 3226-3264. [Crossref]
382. Kai He. 2021. Prediction Model of Juvenile Football Players’ Sports Injury Based on Text
Classification Technology of Machine Learning. Mobile Information Systems 2021, 1-10. [Crossref]
383. Andrew T. Tredennick, Giles Hooker, Stephen P. Ellner, Peter B. Adler. 2021. A practical guide to
selecting models for exploration, inference, and prediction in ecology. Ecology 102:6. . [Crossref]
384. Giovanni Di Franco, Michele Santurro. 2021. Machine learning, artificial neural networks and social
research. Quality & Quantity 55:3, 1007-1025. [Crossref]
385. Ankit Thakkar, Kinjal Chaudhari. 2021. A Comprehensive Survey on Portfolio Optimization, Stock
Price and Trend Prediction Using Particle Swarm Optimization. Archives of Computational Methods
in Engineering 28:4, 2133-2164. [Crossref]
386. Xiaolu Zhou, Weitian Tong. 2021. Learning with self-attention for rental market spatial dynamics in
the Atlanta metropolitan area. Earth Science Informatics 14:2, 837-845. [Crossref]
387. Daniel Jacob. 2021. CATE meets ML. Digital Finance 3:2, 99-148. [Crossref]
388. Chiara Binelli. 2021. Estimating Causal Effects When the Treatment Affects All Subjects
Simultaneously: An Application. Big Data and Cognitive Computing 5:2, 22. [Crossref]
389. Shenhao Wang, Qingyi Wang, Nate Bailey, Jinhua Zhao. 2021. Deep neural networks for choice
analysis: A statistical learning theory perspective. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 148,
60-81. [Crossref]
390. Luca Panzone, Alistair Ulph, Francisco Areal, Valeria Grippo. 2021. A ridge regression approach to
estimate the relationship between landfill taxation and waste collection and disposal in England. Waste
Management 129, 95-110. [Crossref]
391. Domonkos F. Vamossy. 2021. Investor emotions and earnings announcements. Journal of Behavioral
and Experimental Finance 30, 100474. [Crossref]
392. Wenchao Li. 2021. The “miseries” of sex imbalance: Evidence using subjective well-being data. Journal
of Development Economics 151, 102634. [Crossref]
393. Xianxu Bai, Chao Tang. 2021. Dynamic RC operator-based hysteresis model of MR dampers. Smart
Materials and Structures . [Crossref]
394. Nika Haghtalab, Matthew O. Jackson, Ariel D. Procaccia. 2021. Belief polarization in a complex world:
A learning theory perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118:19. . [Crossref]
395. Justin Grimmer, Margaret E. Roberts, Brandon M. Stewart. 2021. Machine Learning for Social
Science: An Agnostic Approach. Annual Review of Political Science 24:1, 395-419. [Crossref]
396. Yongtong Shao, Tao Xiong, Minghao Li, Dermot Hayes, Wendong Zhang, Wei Xie. 2021. China's
Missing Pigs: Correcting China's Hog Inventory Data Using a Machine Learning Approach. American
Journal of Agricultural Economics 103:3, 1082-1098. [Crossref]
397. Kristian Bondo Hansen. 2021. Model Talk: Calculative Cultures in Quantitative Finance. Science,
Technology, & Human Values 46:3, 600-627. [Crossref]
398. Clement Nyamekye, Samuel Anim Ofosu, Richard Arthur, Gabriel Osei, Linda Boamah Appiah,
Samuel Kwofie, Benjamin Ghansah, Dieter Bryniok. 2021. Evaluating the spatial and temporal
variations of aquatic weeds (Biomass) on Lower Volta River using multi-sensor Landsat Images and
machine learning. Heliyon 7:5, e07080. [Crossref]
399. Yash Raj Shrestha, Vivianna Fang He, Phanish Puranam, Georg von Krogh. 2021. Algorithm
Supported Induction for Building Theory: How Can We Use Prediction Models to Theorize?.
Organization Science 32:3, 856-880. [Crossref]
400. Prasanna Tantri. 2021. Fintech for the Poor: Financial Intermediation Without Discrimination*.
Review of Finance 25:2, 561-593. [Crossref]
401. Indah Fitri Astuti, Lisa Faizah, Dyna Marisa Khairina, Dedy Cahyadi. A fuzzy Mamdani approach on
community business loan feasibility assessment 438-442. [Crossref]
402. Rainer Schulz, Martin Wersing. 2021. Automated Valuation Services: A case study for Aberdeen in
Scotland. Journal of Property Research 38:2, 154-172. [Crossref]
403. Andreu Arenas. 2021. Human capital portability and international student migration. Journal of
Economic Geography 21:2, 195-229. [Crossref]
404. Shunqin Chen, Zhengfeng Guo, Xinlei Zhao. 2021. Predicting mortgage early delinquency with
machine learning methods. European Journal of Operational Research 290:1, 358-372. [Crossref]
405. Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Laurie Hughes, Elvira Ismagilova, Gert Aarts, Crispin Coombs, Tom Crick,
Yanqing Duan, Rohita Dwivedi, John Edwards, Aled Eirug, Vassilis Galanos, P. Vigneswara Ilavarasan,
Marijn Janssen, Paul Jones, Arpan Kumar Kar, Hatice Kizgin, Bianca Kronemann, Banita Lal, Biagio
Lucini, Rony Medaglia, Kenneth Le Meunier-FitzHugh, Leslie Caroline Le Meunier-FitzHugh,
Santosh Misra, Emmanuel Mogaji, Sujeet Kumar Sharma, Jang Bahadur Singh, Vishnupriya
Raghavan, Ramakrishnan Raman, Nripendra P. Rana, Spyridon Samothrakis, Jak Spencer, Kuttimani
Tamilmani, Annie Tubadji, Paul Walton, Michael D. Williams. 2021. Artificial Intelligence (AI):
Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice
and policy. International Journal of Information Management 57, 101994. [Crossref]
406. Ahmed Sameer El Khatib. 2021. Machine Learning and Finance. International Journal for Innovation
Education and Research 9:4, 29-55. [Crossref]
407. Hamidreza Taghvaee, Akshay Jain, Xavier Timoneda, Christos Liaskos, Sergi Abadal, Eduard Alarcón,
Albert Cabellos-Aparicio. 2021. Radiation Pattern Prediction for Metasurfaces: A Neural Network-
Based Approach. Sensors 21:8, 2765. [Crossref]
408. Joseph Price, Kasey Buckles, Jacob Van Leeuwen, Isaac Riley. 2021. Combining family history and
machine learning to link historical records: The Census Tree data set. Explorations in Economic History
80, 101391. [Crossref]
409. Shenhao Wang, Baichuan Mo, Jinhua Zhao. 2021. Theory-based residual neural networks: A synergy
of discrete choice models and deep neural networks. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological
146, 333-358. [Crossref]
410. María E. Pérez-Pons, Javier Parra-Dominguez, Sigeru Omatu, Enrique Herrera-Viedma, Juan Manuel
Corchado. 2021. Machine Learning and Traditional Econometric Models: A Systematic Mapping
Study. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing Research 12:2, 79-100. [Crossref]
411. Joseph S Shapiro. 2021. The Environmental Bias of Trade Policy*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics
136:2, 831-886. [Crossref]
412. Joshua Gallin, Raven Molloy, Eric Nielsen, Paul Smith, Kamila Sommer. 2021. Measuring aggregate
housing wealth: New insights from machine learning ☆. Journal of Housing Economics 51, 101734.
[Crossref]
413. Oliver Lock, Michael Bain, Christopher Pettit. 2021. Towards the collaborative development of
machine learning techniques in planning support systems – a Sydney example. Environment and
Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 48:3, 484-502. [Crossref]
414. Nino Antulov-Fantulin, Raffaele Lagravinese, Giuliano Resce. 2021. Predicting bankruptcy of local
government: A machine learning approach. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 183,
681-699. [Crossref]
415. Francesco Bloise, Massimiliano Tancioni. 2021. Predicting the spread of COVID-19 in Italy using
machine learning: Do socio-economic factors matter?. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 56,
310-329. [Crossref]
416. Chirag Kumar, Guillermo Podestá, Katherine Kilpatrick, Peter Minnett. 2021. A machine learning
approach to estimating the error in satellite sea surface temperature retrievals. Remote Sensing of
Environment 255, 112227. [Crossref]
417. Renji George Amballoor, Shankar B. Naik. Utility-based Frequent Itemsets in Data Streams using
Sliding Window 108-112. [Crossref]
418. Clement Nyamekye, Benjamin Ghansah, Emmanuel Agyapong, Samuel Kwofie. 2021. Mapping
Changes in Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining (ASM) Landscape using Machine and Deep Learning
algorithms. - A Proxy Evaluation of the 2017 Ban on ASM in Ghana. Environmental Challenges 5,
100053. [Crossref]
419. Toshiaki Aizawa. 2021. Decomposition of Improvements in Infant Mortality in Asian Developing
Countries Over Three Decades. Demography 58:1, 137-163. [Crossref]
420. Perry Sadorsky. 2021. A Random Forests Approach to Predicting Clean Energy Stock Prices. Journal
of Risk and Financial Management 14:2, 48. [Crossref]
421. Stuart Gabriel, Matteo Iacoviello, Chandler Lutz. 2021. A Crisis of Missed Opportunities? Foreclosure
Costs and Mortgage Modification During the Great Recession. The Review of Financial Studies 34:2,
864-906. [Crossref]
422. Daniele Bianchi, Matthias Büchner, Andrea Tamoni. 2021. Bond Risk Premiums with Machine
Learning. The Review of Financial Studies 34:2, 1046-1089. [Crossref]
423. Lan Gao, Wei Luo, Utsana Tonmukayakul, Marj Moodie, Gang Chen. 2021. Mapping MacNew Heart
Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire onto country-specific EQ-5D-5L utility scores: a comparison
of traditional regression models with a machine learning technique. The European Journal of Health
Economics 174. . [Crossref]
424. Andreas Fagereng, Martin Blomhoff Holm, Kjersti Næss Torstensen. 2021. Housing wealth in
Norway, 1993–20151. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 45:1, 65-81. [Crossref]
425. Qingyuan Zhao, Trevor Hastie. 2021. Causal Interpretations of Black-Box Models. Journal of Business
& Economic Statistics 39:1, 272-281. [Crossref]
426. Marcelo C. Medeiros, Gabriel F. R. Vasconcelos, Álvaro Veiga, Eduardo Zilberman. 2021. Forecasting
Inflation in a Data-Rich Environment: The Benefits of Machine Learning Methods. Journal of
Business & Economic Statistics 39:1, 98-119. [Crossref]
427. Prithwiraj Choudhury, Ryan T. Allen, Michael G. Endres. 2021. Machine learning for pattern
discovery in management research. Strategic Management Journal 42:1, 30-57. [Crossref]
428. Donna B. Gilleskie. 2021. In sickness and in health, until death do us part: A case for theory. Southern
Economic Journal 87:3, 753-768. [Crossref]
429. Agostino Valier. Evaluating AVMs Performance. Beyond the Accuracy 1155-1164. [Crossref]
430. Achim Ahrens, Christopher Aitken, Jan Ditzen, Erkal Ersoy, David Kohns, Mark E. Schaffer. A
Theory-Based Lasso for Time-Series Data 3-36. [Crossref]
431. Achim Ahrens, Christopher Aitken, Mark E. Schaffer. Using Machine Learning Methods to Support
Causal Inference in Econometrics 23-52. [Crossref]
432. Reinaldo Padilha França, Ana Carolina Borges Monteiro, Rangel Arthur, Yuzo Iano. The
Fundamentals and Potential for Cybersecurity of Big Data in the Modern World 51-73. [Crossref]
433. Reinaldo Padilha França, Ana Carolina Borges Monteiro, Rangel Arthur, Yuzo Iano. An Overview of
the Machine Learning Applied in Smart Cities 91-111. [Crossref]
434. Peter Romero, Stephen Fitz. The Use of Psychometrics and Artificial Intelligence in Alternative
Finance 511-587. [Crossref]
435. Falco J. Bargagli-Stoffi, Jan Niederreiter, Massimo Riccaboni. Supervised Learning for the Prediction
of Firm Dynamics 19-41. [Crossref]
436. Ruixin Liang, Joanne Yip, Kai-Tsun Michael To, Yunli Fan. Machine Learning Approaches to Predict
Scoliosis 116-121. [Crossref]
437. Béatrice Boulu-Reshef. Possible in Economics 1-8. [Crossref]
438. Jaehyun Yoon. 2021. Forecasting of Real GDP Growth Using Machine Learning Models: Gradient
Boosting and Random Forest Approach. Computational Economics 57:1, 247-265. [Crossref]
439. Louis J. Catania. The science and technologies of artificial intelligence (AI) 29-72. [Crossref]
440. Louis J. Catania. Current AI applications in medical therapies and services 199-291. [Crossref]
441. Samane Zare, Michael R. Thomsen, Rodolfo M. Nayga, Anthony Goudie. 2021. Use of Machine
Learning to Determine the Information Value of a BMI Screening Program. American Journal of
Preventive Medicine 319. . [Crossref]
442. Christophre Georges, Javier Pereira. 2021. Market stability with machine learning agents. Journal of
Economic Dynamics and Control 122, 104032. [Crossref]
443. Lily Shen, Stephen Ross. 2021. Information value of property description: A Machine learning
approach. Journal of Urban Economics 121, 103299. [Crossref]
444. Michael Yeomans. 2021. A concrete example of construct construction in natural language.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 162, 81-94. [Crossref]
445. Heidi A. Hanson, Claire L. Leiser, Gretchen Bandoli, Brad H. Pollock, Margaret R. Karagas,
Daniel Armstrong, Ann Dozier, Nicole G. Weiskopf, Maureen Monaghan, Ann M. Davis, Elizabeth
Eckstrom, Chunhua Weng, Jonathan N. Tobin, Frederick Kaskel, Mark R. Schleiss, Peter Szilagyi,
Carrie Dykes, Dan Cooper, Shari L. Barkin. 2021. Charting the life course: Emerging opportunities
to advance scientific approaches using life course research. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
5:1. . [Crossref]
446. Shuyin Li, Yang Liu. 2021. News Video Title Extraction Algorithm Based on Deep Learning. IEEE
Access 9, 12143-12157. [Crossref]
447. Weihong Zhou, Yingjie Wang, Xiaoping Gu, Zhong‐Ping Feng, Kang Lee, Yuzhu Peng, Andrew
Barszczyk. 2021. Importance of general adiposity, visceral adiposity and vital signs in predicting blood
biomarkers using machine learning. International Journal of Clinical Practice 75:1. . [Crossref]
448. Elizabeth W. Diemer, James I. Hudson, Kristin N. Javaras. 2021. More (Adjustment) Is Not Always
Better: How Directed Acyclic Graphs Can Help Researchers Decide Which Covariates to Include in
Models for the Causal Relationship between an Exposure and an Outcome in Observational Research.
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 90:5, 289-298. [Crossref]
449. Kristof Lommers, Ouns El Harzli, Jack Kim. 2021. Confronting Machine Learning with Financial
Research. SSRN Electronic Journal 1. . [Crossref]
450. Amitabh Chandra, Evan Flack, Ziad Obermeyer. 2021. The Health Costs of Cost-Sharing. SSRN
451. Itay Goldstein, Chester S. Spatt, Mao Ye. 2021. Big Data in Finance. SSRN Electronic Journal 5. .
[Crossref]
452. Daniel Jacob. 2021. CATE Meets ML - Conditional Average Treatment Effect and Machine
453. Deni Mazrekaj, Vítězslav Titl, Fritz Schiltz. 2021. Identifying Politically Connected Firms: A Machine
Learning Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal 322. . [Crossref]
454. Albert Gyamfi. Determining Appropriate Social Media Sites for Knowledge Sharing 16-42. [Crossref]
455. Michael Peichl, Stephan Thober, Luis Samaniego, Bernd Hansjürgens, Andreas Marx. 2021.
Machine-learning methods to assess the effects of a non-linear damage spectrum taking into account
soil moisture on winter wheat yields in Germany. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 25:12,
6523-6545. [Crossref]
456. Hazik Mohamed. I-FinTech and Its Value Proposition for Islamic Asset and Wealth Management
249-266. [Crossref]
457. Hakan Kahyaoglu. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Central Banking and Monetary Policies
83-98. [Crossref]
458. Mohammadsaleh Saadatmand, Tuğrul U. Daim. Technology Intelligence Map: Finance Machine
Learning 337-356. [Crossref]
459. Tony Liu, Lyle Ungar, Konrad Kording. 2021. Quantifying causality in data science with quasi-
experiments. Nature Computational Science 1:1, 24-32. [Crossref]
460. Mehmet Güney Celbiş. Applications of Machine Learning Models in Regional and Demographic
Economic Analysis: A Literature Survey 219-229. [Crossref]
461. Lucia Alessi, Roberto Savona. Machine Learning for Financial Stability 65-87. [Crossref]
462. Kaustubh Arun Bhavsar, Ahed Abugabah, Jimmy Singla, Ahmad Ali AlZubi, Ali Kashif Bashir,
Nikita. 2021. A Comprehensive Review on Medical Diagnosis Using Machine Learning. Computers,
Materials & Continua 67:2, 1997-2014. [Crossref]
463. Tim de Silva, David Thesmar. 2021. The Complementarity Between Man and Machine in
Forecasting. SSRN Electronic Journal 64. . [Crossref]
464. Christophe Hurlin, Christophe Perignon, Sébastien Saurin. 2021. The Fairness of Credit Scoring
Models. SSRN Electronic Journal 11. . [Crossref]
465. J. Michelle Brock, Ralph De Haas. 2021. Discriminatory Lending: Evidence from Bankers in the Lab.
466. Jake Krupa, Miguel Minutti-Meza. 2021. Regression and Machine Learning Methods to Predict
Discrete Outcomes in Accounting Research. SSRN Electronic Journal 3466478. . [Crossref]
467. Xiang Zheng. 2021. How can Innovation Screening be Improved? A Machine Learning Analysis with
Economic Consequences for Firm Performance. SSRN Electronic Journal 31. . [Crossref]
468. Madhura Dasgupta, Samarth Gupta. 2021. Determinants of Self-Help Groups lending to Enterprises
in India: A Predictive Assessment using Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms. SSRN Electronic
469. Gerard Domènech-Arumí. 2021. Neighborhoods, Perceived Inequality, and Preferences for
Redistribution: Evidence from Barcelona. SSRN Electronic Journal 95. . [Crossref]
470. Paul Hünermund, Jermain Kaminski, Carla Schmitt. 2021. Causal Machine Learning and Business
Decision Making. SSRN Electronic Journal 33. . [Crossref]
471. Francesca Micocci, Armando Rungi. 2021. Predicting Exporters with Machine Learning. SSRN
472. Mario Hendriock. 2021. Forecasting Earnings with Predicted, Conditional Probability Density
Functions. SSRN Electronic Journal 11. . [Crossref]
473. Simon Blöthner, Mario Larch. 2021. Economic Determinants of Regional Trade Agreements
Revisited Using Machine Learning. SSRN Electronic Journal 7. . [Crossref]
474. James T. E. Chapman, Ajit Desai. 2021. Macroeconomic Predictions using Payments Data and
Machine Learning. SSRN Electronic Journal 29. . [Crossref]
475. Martin Thomas Hibbeln, Raphael M. Kopp, Noah Urban. 2021. Credit Risk Modeling in the Age
of Machine Learning. SSRN Electronic Journal 44. . [Crossref]
476. Mobina Shafaati, Don M. Chance, Robert E. Brooks. 2021. The Cross-Section of Individual Equity
Option Returns. SSRN Electronic Journal 61. . [Crossref]
477. Grazia Cecere, Nicoletta Corrocher, Clara Jean. 2021. Fair or Unbiased Algorithmic Decision-
Making? A Review of the Literature on Digital Economics. SSRN Electronic Journal 13. . [Crossref]
478. Emanuel Kohlscheen. 2021. What does machine learning say about the drivers of inflation?. SSRN
479. Andrew Tsang. 2021. Uncovering Heterogeneous Regional Impacts of Chinese Monetary Policy.
480. Andrew Tsang. 2021. Uncovering Heterogeneous Regional Impacts of Chinese Monetary Policy.
481. Gabriel Loumeau, Christian Stettler. 2021. Fiscal Autonomy and Self-Determination. SSRN
482. Archana Das, Saswat Kumar Das, Naveen Rathee. 2021. Roles of Big Data, Data Science, Artificial
Intelligence in Entrepreneurships. SSRN Electronic Journal 55. . [Crossref]
483. Man Cho, Seongwuk Moon, Inbok Rhee. 2021. A Sectoral Approach in Assessing the Data Economy
Ecosystem: Focusing on the Finance, Real Estate, and Medical Service Sectors in Korea. SSRN
484. Benjamin Ghansah, Clement Nyamekye, Seth Owusu, Emmanuel Agyapong. 2021. Mapping flood
prone and Hazards Areas in rural landscape using landsat images and random forest classification:
Case study of Nasia watershed in Ghana. Cogent Engineering 8:1. . [Crossref]
485. Gharad Bryan, Dean S. Karlan, Adam Osman. 2021. Big Loans to Small Businesses: Predicting
Winners and Losers in an Entrepreneurial Lending Experiment. SSRN Electronic Journal 51. .
[Crossref]
486. YongKi Hong. 2021. Related-Party Trades in Vertical Integration. SSRN Electronic Journal 64. .
[Crossref]
487. Jiajie Xu. 2021. The Effect of Tax Incentives on Local Private Investments and Entrepreneurship:
Evidence from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. SSRN Electronic Journal 72. . [Crossref]
488. Wen Chen, Bo Hu, Liyan Yang. 2021. Whence LASSO? A Rational Interpretation. SSRN Electronic
489. Sandra Achten, Christian Lessmann. 2020. Spatial inequality, geography and economic activity. World
Development 136, 105114. [Crossref]
490. Giorgio Tripodi, Francesca Chiaromonte, Fabrizio Lillo. 2020. Knowledge and social relatedness shape
research portfolio diversification. Scientific Reports 10:1. . [Crossref]
491. Julian M. Saad, James O. Prochaska. 2020. A philosophy of health: life as reality, health as a universal
value. Palgrave Communications 6:1. . [Crossref]
492. Arjun Remadevi Somanathan, Suprabha Kudigrama Rama. 2020. A Bibliometric Review of Stock
Market Prediction: Perspective of Emerging Markets. Applied Computer Systems 25:2, 77-86.
[Crossref]
493. Manuel J. García Rodríguez, Vicente Rodríguez Montequín, Francisco Ortega Fernández, Joaquín M.
Villanueva Balsera. 2020. Bidders Recommender for Public Procurement Auctions Using Machine
Learning: Data Analysis, Algorithm, and Case Study with Tenders from Spain. Complexity 2020,
1-20. [Crossref]
494. Carolina Castagnetti, Luisa Rosti, Marina Töpfer. The Age Pay Gap between Young and Older
Employees in Italy: Perceived or Real Discrimination against the Young? 195-221. [Crossref]
495. Michael T. Kiley. 2020. Financial Conditions and Economic Activity: Insights from Machine
Learning. Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2020:095, 1-40. [Crossref]
496. Avinash Kaur, Pooja Gupta, Parminder Singh, Manpreet Singh. 2020. Data Placement Oriented
Scheduling Algorithm for Scheduling Scientific Workflow in Cloud: A Budget-Aware Approach.
Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications 13:5, 871-883. [Crossref]
497. Kristian Jönsson. 2020. Machine Learning and Nowcasts of Swedish GDP. Journal of Business Cycle
498. Fiona Burlig, Christopher Knittel, David Rapson, Mar Reguant, Catherine Wolfram. 2020. Machine
Learning from Schools about Energy Efficiency. Journal of the Association of Environmental and
Resource Economists 7:6, 1181-1217. [Crossref]
499. YA-HUI LIN, SHAO-WEN CHIU, YING-CHE LIN, CHIEN-CHUNG LIN, LUNG-
KWANG PAN. 2020. INVERSE PROBLEM ALGORITHM APPLICATION TO SEMI-
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF 272 PATIENTS WITH ISCHEMIC STROKE SYMPTOMS:
CAROTID STENOSIS RISK ASSESSMENT FOR FIVE RISK FACTORS. Journal of Mechanics
in Medicine and Biology 20:09, 2040021. [Crossref]
500. Markku Maula, Wouter Stam. 2020. Enhancing Rigor in Quantitative Entrepreneurship Research.
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 44:6, 1059-1090. [Crossref]
501. Omar Isaac Asensio, Ximin Mi, Sameer Dharur. 2020. Using Machine Learning Techniques to Aid
Environmental Policy Analysis. Case Studies in the Environment 4:1. . [Crossref]
502. Winky K.O. Ho, Bo-Sin Tang, Siu Wai Wong. 2020. Predicting property prices with machine learning
algorithms. Journal of Property Research 147, 1-23. [Crossref]
503. Jens Frankenreiter, Michael A. Livermore. 2020. Computational Methods in Legal Analysis. Annual
Review of Law and Social Science 16:1, 39-57. [Crossref]
504. Songul Cinaroglu. 2020. Modelling unbalanced catastrophic health expenditure data by using
machine‐learning methods. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management 27:4, 168-181.
[Crossref]
505. Vivianna Fang He, Phanish Puranam, Yash Raj Shrestha, Georg Krogh. 2020. Resolving governance
disputes in communities: A study of software license decisions. Strategic Management Journal 41:10,
1837-1868. [Crossref]
506. Jens Prüfer, Patricia Prüfer. 2020. Data science for entrepreneurship research: studying demand
dynamics for entrepreneurial skills in the Netherlands. Small Business Economics 55:3, 651-672.
[Crossref]
507. Jermain C. Kaminski, Christian Hopp. 2020. Predicting outcomes in crowdfunding campaigns with
textual, visual, and linguistic signals. Small Business Economics 55:3, 627-649. [Crossref]
508. Eugenio Levi, Fabrizio Patriarca. 2020. An exploratory study of populism: the municipality-level
predictors of electoral outcomes in Italy. Economia Politica 37:3, 833-875. [Crossref]
509. Wanling Qiu, Simon Rudkin, Paweł Dłotko. 2020. Refining understanding of corporate failure
through a topological data analysis mapping of Altman’s Z-score model. Expert Systems with
Applications 156, 113475. [Crossref]
510. Elyria Kemp, Gregory N. Price, Nicole R. Fuller, Edna Faye Kemp. 2020. African Americans and
COVID-19: Beliefs, behaviors and vulnerability to infection. International Journal of Healthcare
Management 13:4, 303-311. [Crossref]
511. Ali Hayek, Zaher Khraibani, Dana Radwan, Nabil Tabaja, Samir Abbad Andaloussi, Joumana
Toufaily, Evelyne Garnier-Zarli, Tayssir Hamieh. 2020. Analysis of the extreme and records values for
temperature and precipitation in Lebanon. Communications in Statistics: Case Studies, Data Analysis
and Applications 6:4, 411-428. [Crossref]
512. Heidi Webber, Gunnar Lischeid, Michael Sommer, Robert Finger, Claas Nendel, Thomas Gaiser,
Frank Ewert. 2020. No perfect storm for crop yield failure in Germany. Environmental Research Letters
15:10, 104012. [Crossref]
513. SeyedSoroosh Azizi, Kiana Yektansani. 2020. Artificial Intelligence and Predicting Illegal Immigration
to the USA. International Migration 58:5, 183-193. [Crossref]
514. Michael F. Lohrer, Yang Liu, Darrin M. Hanna, Kang-Hsin Wang, Fu-Tong Liu, Ted A. Laurence,
Gang-yu Liu. 2020. Determination of the Maturation Status of Dendritic Cells by Applying Pattern
Recognition to High-Resolution Images. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 124:39, 8540-8548.
[Crossref]
515. Berkay Eren, Mehmet Ali Guvenc, Selcuk Mistikoglu. 2020. Artificial Intelligence Applications for
Friction Stir Welding: A Review. Metals and Materials International 54. . [Crossref]
516. Joshua B. Smith, Matthew Shew, Omar A. Karadaghy, Rohit Nallani, Kevin J. Sykes, Gregory N.
Gan, Jason A. Brant, Andrés M. Bur. 2020. Predicting salvage laryngectomy in patients treated with
primary nonsurgical therapy for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma using machine learning. Head &
Neck 42:9, 2330-2339. [Crossref]
517. Liye Ma, Baohong Sun. 2020. Machine learning and AI in marketing – Connecting computing power
to human insights. International Journal of Research in Marketing 37:3, 481-504. [Crossref]
518. C. Kokkotis, S. Moustakidis, E. Papageorgiou, G. Giakas, D.E. Tsaopoulos. 2020. Machine learning
in knee osteoarthritis: A review. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open 2:3, 100069. [Crossref]
519. Huamao Wang, Yumei Yao, Said Salhi. 2020. Tension in big data using machine learning: Analysis
and applications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 158, 120175. [Crossref]
520. Shenhao Wang, Qingyi Wang, Jinhua Zhao. 2020. Deep neural networks for choice analysis:
Extracting complete economic information for interpretation. Transportation Research Part C:
Emerging Technologies 118, 102701. [Crossref]
521. Tobias Götze, Marc Gürtler, Eileen Witowski. 2020. Improving CAT bond pricing models via
machine learning. Journal of Asset Management 21:5, 428-446. [Crossref]
522. Louis R. Nemzer, Florence Neymotin. 2020. How words matter: machine learning & movie success.
Applied Economics Letters 27:15, 1272-1276. [Crossref]
523. Mitsuru Igami. 2020. Artificial intelligence as structural estimation: Deep Blue, Bonanza, and
AlphaGo. The Econometrics Journal 23:3, S1-S24. [Crossref]
524. Jeppe Druedahl, Anders Munk-Nielsen. 2020. Higher-order income dynamics with linked regression
trees. The Econometrics Journal 23:3, S25-S58. [Crossref]
525. Gary Smith. 2020. Data mining fool’s gold. Journal of Information Technology 35:3, 182-194.
[Crossref]
526. Ryan Engstrom, David Newhouse, Vidhya Soundararajan. 2020. Estimating small-area population
density in Sri Lanka using surveys and Geo-spatial data. PLOS ONE 15:8, e0237063. [Crossref]
527. Louis R. Nemzer, Florence Neymotin. 2020. Concierge care and patient reviews. Health Economics
29:8, 913-922. [Crossref]
528. Matthew A. Cole, Robert J R Elliott, Bowen Liu. 2020. The Impact of the Wuhan Covid-19
Lockdown on Air Pollution and Health: A Machine Learning and Augmented Synthetic Control
Approach. Environmental and Resource Economics 76:4, 553-580. [Crossref]
529. Ahmet Murat Ozbayoglu, Mehmet Ugur Gudelek, Omer Berat Sezer. 2020. Deep learning for
financial applications : A survey. Applied Soft Computing 93, 106384. [Crossref]
530. Arsen Sheverdin, Francesco Monticone, Constantinos Valagiannopoulos. 2020. Photonic Inverse
Design with Neural Networks: The Case of Invisibility in the Visible. Physical Review Applied 14:2. .
[Crossref]
531. Michelle Sapitang, Wanie M. Ridwan, Khairul Faizal Kushiar, Ali Najah Ahmed, Ahmed El-
Shafie. 2020. Machine Learning Application in Reservoir Water Level Forecasting for Sustainable
Hydropower Generation Strategy. Sustainability 12:15, 6121. [Crossref]
532. Anita M. Cassard, Brian W. Sloboda. AI and AR 216-231. [Crossref]
533. Rohit Sharma, Sachin S. Kamble, Angappa Gunasekaran, Vikas Kumar, Anil Kumar. 2020. A
systematic literature review on machine learning applications for sustainable agriculture supply chain
performance. Computers & Operations Research 119, 104926. [Crossref]
534. Xilei Zhao, Xiang Yan, Alan Yu, Pascal Van Hentenryck. 2020. Prediction and behavioral analysis of
travel mode choice: A comparison of machine learning and logit models. Travel Behaviour and Society
20, 22-35. [Crossref]
535. Crocker H Liu, Adam D Nowak, Patrick S Smith. 2020. Asymmetric or Incomplete Information
about Asset Values?. The Review of Financial Studies 33:7, 2898-2936. [Crossref]
536. Christopher Munch, Mehdi B. Tahoori. Defect Characterization of Spintronic-based Neuromorphic
Circuits 1-4. [Crossref]
537. Jonathan A. Cook, Saad Siddiqui. 2020. Random forests and selected samples. Bulletin of Economic
538. Alette Tammenga. 2020. The application of Artificial Intelligence in banks in the context of the three
lines of defence model. Maandblad Voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie 94:5/6, 219-230. [Crossref]
539. Hugo Storm, Kathy Baylis, Thomas Heckelei. 2020. Machine learning in agricultural and applied
economics. European Review of Agricultural Economics 47:3, 849-892. [Crossref]
540. Jian-qiang Guo, Shu-hen Chiang, Min Liu, Chi-Chun Yang, Kai-yi Guo. 2020. CAN MACHINE
LEARNING ALGORITHMS ASSOCIATED WITH TEXT MINING FROM INTERNET
DATA IMPROVE HOUSING PRICE PREDICTION PERFORMANCE?. International Journal of
Strategic Property Management 24:5, 300-312. [Crossref]
541. Philip Hans Franses, Thomas Wiemann. 2020. Intertemporal Similarity of Economic Time Series:
An Application of Dynamic Time Warping. Computational Economics 56:1, 59-75. [Crossref]
542. Gary Smith. 2020. The paradox of big data. SN Applied Sciences 2:6. . [Crossref]
543. Gonul Colak, Mengchuan Fu, Iftekhar Hasan. 2020. Why are some Chinese firms failing in the US
capital markets? A machine learning approach. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 61, 101331. [Crossref]
544. Robert Northcott. 2020. Big data and prediction: Four case studies. Studies in History and Philosophy
of Science Part A 81, 96-104. [Crossref]
545. Andrew B. Martinez. 2020. Forecast Accuracy Matters for Hurricane Damage. Econometrics 8:2, 18.
[Crossref]
546. Zhao Tong, Xiaomei Deng, Hongjian Chen, Jing Mei, Hong Liu. 2020. QL-HEFT: a novel machine
learning scheduling scheme base on cloud computing environment. Neural Computing and Applications
32:10, 5553-5570. [Crossref]
547. Nanae Kaneko, Yu Fujimoto, Satoshi Kabe, Motonari Hayashida, Yasuhiro Hayashi. 2020. Sparse
modeling approach for identifying the dominant factors affecting situation-dependent hourly
electricity demand. Applied Energy 265, 114752. [Crossref]
548. Christophe Croux, Julapa Jagtiani, Tarunsai Korivi, Milos Vulanovic. 2020. Important factors
determining Fintech loan default: Evidence from a lendingclub consumer platform. Journal of
Economic Behavior & Organization 173, 270-296. [Crossref]
549. Kevin A. Bryan, Yasin Ozcan, Bhaven Sampat. 2020. In-text patent citations: A user's guide. Research
Policy 49:4, 103946. [Crossref]
550. Omer Berat Sezer, Mehmet Ugur Gudelek, Ahmet Murat Ozbayoglu. 2020. Financial time series
forecasting with deep learning : A systematic literature review: 2005–2019. Applied Soft Computing
90, 106181. [Crossref]
551. Marcos M. López de Prado. Machine Learning for Asset Managers 44, . [Crossref]
552. Georges Bresson. Comments on “An Econometrician’s Perspective on Big Data” by Cheng Hsiao
431-443. [Crossref]
553. Matthew J. Salganik, Ian Lundberg, Alexander T. Kindel, Caitlin E. Ahearn, Khaled Al-Ghoneim,
Abdullah Almaatouq, Drew M. Altschul, Jennie E. Brand, Nicole Bohme Carnegie, Ryan James
Compton, Debanjan Datta, Thomas Davidson, Anna Filippova, Connor Gilroy, Brian J. Goode,
Eaman Jahani, Ridhi Kashyap, Antje Kirchner, Stephen McKay, Allison C. Morgan, Alex Pentland,
Kivan Polimis, Louis Raes, Daniel E. Rigobon, Claudia V. Roberts, Diana M. Stanescu, Yoshihiko
Suhara, Adaner Usmani, Erik H. Wang, Muna Adem, Abdulla Alhajri, Bedoor AlShebli, Redwane
Amin, Ryan B. Amos, Lisa P. Argyle, Livia Baer-Bositis, Moritz Büchi, Bo-Ryehn Chung, William
Eggert, Gregory Faletto, Zhilin Fan, Jeremy Freese, Tejomay Gadgil, Josh Gagné, Yue Gao, Andrew
Halpern-Manners, Sonia P. Hashim, Sonia Hausen, Guanhua He, Kimberly Higuera, Bernie Hogan,
Ilana M. Horwitz, Lisa M. Hummel, Naman Jain, Kun Jin, David Jurgens, Patrick Kaminski, Areg
Karapetyan, E. H. Kim, Ben Leizman, Naijia Liu, Malte Möser, Andrew E. Mack, Mayank Mahajan,
Noah Mandell, Helge Marahrens, Diana Mercado-Garcia, Viola Mocz, Katariina Mueller-Gastell,
Ahmed Musse, Qiankun Niu, William Nowak, Hamidreza Omidvar, Andrew Or, Karen Ouyang,
Katy M. Pinto, Ethan Porter, Kristin E. Porter, Crystal Qian, Tamkinat Rauf, Anahit Sargsyan,
Thomas Schaffner, Landon Schnabel, Bryan Schonfeld, Ben Sender, Jonathan D. Tang, Emma
Tsurkov, Austin van Loon, Onur Varol, Xiafei Wang, Zhi Wang, Julia Wang, Flora Wang, Samantha
Weissman, Kirstie Whitaker, Maria K. Wolters, Wei Lee Woon, James Wu, Catherine Wu, Kengran
Yang, Jingwen Yin, Bingyu Zhao, Chenyun Zhu, Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, Barbara E. Engelhardt, Moritz
Hardt, Dean Knox, Karen Levy, Arvind Narayanan, Brandon M. Stewart, Duncan J. Watts, Sara
McLanahan. 2020. Measuring the predictability of life outcomes with a scientific mass collaboration.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117:15, 8398-8403. [Crossref]
554. Filiz Garip. 2020. What failure to predict life outcomes can teach us. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences 117:15, 8234-8235. [Crossref]
555. José-Luis Alfaro-Navarro, Emilio L. Cano, Esteban Alfaro-Cortés, Noelia García, Matías Gámez,
Beatriz Larraz. 2020. A Fully Automated Adjustment of Ensemble Methods in Machine Learning for
Modeling Complex Real Estate Systems. Complexity 2020, 1-12. [Crossref]
556. Raymond Duch, Denise Laroze, Thomas Robinson, Pablo Beramendi. 2020. Multi-modes for
Detecting Experimental Measurement Error. Political Analysis 28:2, 263-283. [Crossref]
557. Agostino Valier. 2020. Who performs better? AVMs vs hedonic models. Journal of Property Investment
& Finance 38:3, 213-225. [Crossref]
558. Thorsten Sellhorn. 2020. Machine Learning und empirische Rechnungslegungsforschung: Einige
Erkenntnisse und offene Fragen. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 72:1,
49-69. [Crossref]
559. Natalya V Kontsevaya. 2020. On the specificity of modeling market dynamics. Journal of Physics:
Conference Series 1479:1, 012032. [Crossref]
560. Achim Ahrens, Christian B. Hansen, Mark E. Schaffer. 2020. lassopack: Model selection and
prediction with regularized regression in Stata. The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on
statistics and Stata 20:1, 176-235. [Crossref]
561. Mathias Bärtl, Simone Krummaker. 2020. Prediction of Claims in Export Credit Finance: A
Comparison of Four Machine Learning Techniques. Risks 8:1, 22. [Crossref]
562. David Easley, Eleonora Patacchini, Christopher Rojas. 2020. Multidimensional diffusion processes in
dynamic online networks. PLOS ONE 15:2, e0228421. [Crossref]
563. Giovanni Cicceri, Giuseppe Inserra, Michele Limosani. 2020. A Machine Learning Approach to
Forecast Economic Recessions—An Italian Case Study. Mathematics 8:2, 241. [Crossref]
564. Jianhua Zhang, Mohammad Shahidul Islam. 2020. The Heterogeneous Impacts of R&D on
Innovation in Services Sector: A Firm-Level Study of Developing ASEAN. Sustainability 12:4, 1643.
[Crossref]
565. Christophe Hurlin, Christophe Pérignon. 2020. Machine learning et nouvelles sources de données
pour le scoring de crédit. Revue d'économie financière N° 135:3, 21-50. [Crossref]
566. Mohamed Alloghani, Dhiya Al-Jumeily, Jamila Mustafina, Abir Hussain, Ahmed J. Aljaaf. A
Systematic Review on Supervised and Unsupervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Data Science
3-21. [Crossref]
567. David Watson. The Rhetoric and Reality of Anthropomorphism in Artificial Intelligence 45-65.
[Crossref]
568. Petrus H. Potgieter. Machine Learning and Forecasting: A Review 193-207. [Crossref]
569. Matthew F. Dixon, Igor Halperin, Paul Bilokon. Feedforward Neural Networks 111-166. [Crossref]
570. Mitja Kovač. Introduction to the Autonomous Artificial Intelligence Systems 47-63. [Crossref]
571. Agostino Valier. The Cross Validation in Automated Valuation Models: A Proposal for Use 585-596.
[Crossref]
572. Chuan Liao, Jiangxiao Qiu, Bin Chen, Deliang Chen, Bojie Fu, Matei Georgescu, Chunyang He,
G. Darrel Jenerette, Xia Li, Xiaoyan Li, Xin Li, Bading Qiuying, Peijun Shi, Jianguo Wu. 2020.
Advancing landscape sustainability science: theoretical foundation and synergies with innovations in
methodology, design, and application. Landscape Ecology 35:1, 1-9. [Crossref]
573. Muhammad Bilal, Lukumon O. Oyedele. 2020. Guidelines for applied machine learning in
construction industry—A case of profit margins estimation. Advanced Engineering Informatics 43,
101013. [Crossref]
574. Marcus H. Böhme, André Gröger, Tobias Stöhr. 2020. Searching for a better life: Predicting
international migration with online search keywords. Journal of Development Economics 142, 102347.
[Crossref]
575. Ludovic Rheault, Christopher Cochrane. 2020. Word Embeddings for the Analysis of Ideological
Placement in Parliamentary Corpora. Political Analysis 28:1, 112-133. [Crossref]
576. Steven Buck, Maximilian Auffhammer, Hilary Soldati, David Sunding. 2020. Forecasting Residential
Water Consumption in California: Rethinking Model Selection. Water Resources Research 56:1. .
[Crossref]
577. Kristian Bondo Hansen. 2020. The virtue of simplicity: On machine learning models in algorithmic
trading. Big Data & Society 7:1, 205395172092655. [Crossref]
578. Jorge Iván Pérez Rave, Favián González Echavarría, Juan Carlos Correa Morales. 2020. Modeling of
apartment prices in a Colombian context from a machine learning approach with stable-important
attributes. DYNA 87:212, 63-72. [Crossref]
579. Lily Shen, Stephen L. Ross. 2020. Information Value of Property Description: A Machine Learning
Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
580. Elena-Ivona Dumitrescu, Sullivan Hué, Christophe Hurlin, sessi tokpavi. 2020. Machine Learning
or Econometrics for Credit Scoring: Let's Get the Best of Both Worlds. SSRN Electronic Journal .
[Crossref]
581. Falco Bargagli Stoffi, Massimo Riccaboni, Armando Rungi. 2020. Machine Learning for Zombie
Hunting. Firms' Failures and Financial Constraints. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
582. Ranik Raaen Wahlstrøm, Florentina Paraschiv, Michael Schürle. 2020. A Comparative Analysis of
Parsimonious Yield Curve Models with Focus on the Nelson-Siegel, Svensson and Bliss Models. SSRN
Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
583. Luca Barbaglia, Sebastiano Manzan, Elisa Tosetti. 2020. Forecasting Loan Default in Europe with
Machine Learning. SSRN Electronic Journal 36. . [Crossref]
584. Christopher Hennessy, Charles A.E. Goodhart. 2020. Goodhart's Law and Machine Learning. SSRN
585. Kevin Bauer, Nicolas Pfeuffer, Benjamin Abdel-Karim, Oliver Hinz, Michael Kosfeld. 2020. The
Terminator of Social Welfare? The Economic Consequences of Algorithmic Discrimination. SSRN
586. Yucheng Yang, Zhong Zheng, Weinan E. 2020. Interpretable Neural Networks for Panel Data Analysis
in Economics. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
587. Elliott Ash, Sergio Galletta, Tommaso Giommoni. 2020. A Machine Learning Approach to Analyzing
Corruption in Local Public Finances. SSRN Electronic Journal 156. . [Crossref]
588. Domonkos F. Vamossy. 2020. Investor Emotions and Earnings Announcements. SSRN Electronic
589. Yulin Liu, Luyao Zhang. 2020. Cryptocurrency Valuation and Machine Learning. SSRN Electronic
590. Paul G. Geertsema, Helen Lu. 2020. Relative Valuation with Machine Learning. SSRN Electronic
591. Xi Chen, Yang Ha Cho, Yiwei Dou, Baruch Itamar Lev. 2020. Fundamental Analysis of XBRL Data:
A Machine Learning Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal 58. . [Crossref]
592. Juan Díaz, Erwin Hansen, Gabriel Cabrera. 2020. Predictive Regressions for Aggregate Stock Market
Volatility with Machine Learning. SSRN Electronic Journal 9. . [Crossref]
593. Huy Duc Dang, Au Hai Thi Dam, Thuyen Thi Pham, Tra My Thi Nguyen. 2019. Determinants
of credit demand of farmers in Lam Dong, Vietnam. Agricultural Finance Review 80:2, 255-274.
[Crossref]
594. Stefan P. Penczynski. 2019. Using machine learning for communication classification. Experimental
Economics 22:4, 1002-1029. [Crossref]
595. Yang Zhou, Shuaishuai Zhang, Libo Wu, Yingjie Tian. 2019. Predicting sectoral electricity
consumption based on complex network analysis. Applied Energy 255, 113790. [Crossref]
596. E.E. Kangal, M. Salti, O. Aydogdu. 2019. Machine learning algorithm in a caloric view point of
cosmology. Physics of the Dark Universe 26, 100369. [Crossref]
597. Qi Wu, Xing Yan. 2019. Capturing deep tail risk via sequential learning of quantile dynamics. Journal
of Economic Dynamics and Control 109, 103771. [Crossref]
598. Ramkumar Harikrishnakumar, Alok Dand, Saideep Nannapaneni, Krishna Krishnan. Supervised
Machine Learning Approach for Effective Supplier Classification 240-245. [Crossref]
599. Elham Buxton, Kenneth Kriz, Matthew Cremeens, Kim Jay. An Auto Regressive Deep Learning
Model for Sales Tax Forecasting from Multiple Short Time Series 1359-1364. [Crossref]
600. Sen Yang, Dave Towey, Zhi Quan Zhou, T.Y. Chen. Preparing Software Quality Assurance
Professionals: Metamorphic Exploration for Machine Learning 1-7. [Crossref]
601. Manuel Huber, Christoph Kurz, Reiner Leidl. 2019. Predicting patient-reported outcomes following
hip and knee replacement surgery using supervised machine learning. BMC Medical Informatics and
Decision Making 19:1. . [Crossref]
602. Manav Raj, Robert Seamans. 2019. Primer on artificial intelligence and robotics. Journal of
Organization Design 8:1. . [Crossref]
603. Shengying Zhai, Qihui Chen, Wenxin Wang. 2019. What Drives Green Fodder Supply in China?—
A Nerlovian Analysis with LASSO Variable Selection. Sustainability 11:23, 6692. [Crossref]
604. Erik Brynjolfsson, Xiang Hui, Meng Liu. 2019. Does Machine Translation Affect International
Trade? Evidence from a Large Digital Platform. Management Science 65:12, 5449-5460. [Crossref]
605. Ron Adner, Phanish Puranam, Feng Zhu. 2019. What Is Different About Digital Strategy? From
Quantitative to Qualitative Change. Strategy Science 4:4, 253-261. [Crossref]
606. Jorge Mejia, Shawn Mankad, Anandasivam Gopal. 2019. A for Effort? Using the Crowd to Identify
Moral Hazard in New York City Restaurant Hygiene Inspections. Information Systems Research 30:4,
1363-1386. [Crossref]
607. Alessandro Roncaglia. The Age of Fragmentation 2, . [Crossref]
608. . Technological Change 136-157. [Crossref]
609. Prithwiraj Choudhury, Dan Wang, Natalie A. Carlson, Tarun Khanna. 2019. Machine learning
approaches to facial and text analysis: Discovering CEO oral communication styles. Strategic
Management Journal 40:11, 1705-1732. [Crossref]
610. Vasilios Plakandaras, Periklis Gogas, Theophilos Papadimitriou, Rangan Gupta. 2019. A re-evaluation
of the term spread as a leading indicator. International Review of Economics & Finance 64, 476-492.
[Crossref]
611. David McKenzie, Dario Sansone. 2019. Predicting entrepreneurial success is hard: Evidence from a
business plan competition in Nigeria. Journal of Development Economics 141, 102369. [Crossref]
612. Arno Parolini, Wei Wu Tan, Aron Shlonsky. 2019. Decision-based models of the implementation
of interventions in systems of healthcare: Implementation outcomes and intervention effectiveness in
complex service environments. PLOS ONE 14:10, e0223129. [Crossref]
613. Eszter Czibor, David Jimenez‐Gomez, John A. List. 2019. The Dozen Things Experimental
Economists Should Do (More of ). Southern Economic Journal 86:2, 371-432. [Crossref]
614. Nicolas Huck. 2019. Large data sets and machine learning: Applications to statistical arbitrage.
European Journal of Operational Research 278:1, 330-342. [Crossref]
615. Yijiang Liu, Yinghong Wan, Xiao Su. 2019. Identifying individual expectations in service recovery
through natural language processing and machine learning. Expert Systems with Applications 131,
288-298. [Crossref]
616. Adel Daoud, Rockli Kim, S.V. Subramanian. 2019. Predicting women's height from their
socioeconomic status: A machine learning approach. Social Science & Medicine 238, 112486. [Crossref]
617. Joseph R. Cimpian, Jennifer D. Timmer. 2019. Large-Scale Estimates of LGBQ-Heterosexual
Disparities in the Presence of Potentially Mischievous Responders: A Preregistered Replication and
Comparison of Methods. AERA Open 5:4, 233285841988889. [Crossref]
618. Kamran Soomro, Muhammad Nasir Mumtaz Bhutta, Zaheer Khan, Muhammad A. Tahir. 2019.
Smart city big data analytics: An advanced review. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 9:5. .
[Crossref]
619. David Watson. 2019. The Rhetoric and Reality of Anthropomorphism in Artificial Intelligence. Minds
and Machines 29:3, 417-440. [Crossref]
620. Austin M. Williams. 2019. Understanding the micro-determinants of defensive behaviors against
pollution. Ecological Economics 163, 42-51. [Crossref]
621. Ian Hoffman, Evan Mast. 2019. Heterogeneity in the effect of federal spending on local crime:
Evidence from causal forests. Regional Science and Urban Economics 78, 103463. [Crossref]
622. Meenakshi Meenakshi, Satpal. A Novel Approach Web Services Based Long Tail Web Services Using
Deep Neural Network 1-9. [Crossref]
623. Tien-Tung Nguyen, Jong-Ho Lee, Minh-Tuan Nguyen, Yong-Hwa Kim. 2019. Machine Learning-
Based Relay Selection for Secure Transmission in Multi-Hop DF Relay Networks. Electronics 8:9,
949. [Crossref]
624. R. Arjun, K.R. Suprabha. 2019. Forecasting banking sectors in Indian stock markets using machine
intelligence. International Journal of Hybrid Intelligent Systems 15:3, 129-142. [Crossref]
625. Susan Athey, Guido W. Imbens. 2019. Machine Learning Methods That Economists Should Know
About. Annual Review of Economics 11:1, 685-725. [Crossref]
626. Vincent P. Crawford. 2019. Experiments on Cognition, Communication, Coordination, and
Cooperation in Relationships. Annual Review of Economics 11:1, 167-191. [Crossref]
627. Xiaolu Zhou, Weitian Tong, Dongying Li. 2019. Modeling Housing Rent in the Atlanta Metropolitan
Area Using Textual Information and Deep Learning. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
8:8, 349. [Crossref]
628. Lei Dong, Carlo Ratti, Siqi Zheng. 2019. Predicting neighborhoods’ socioeconomic attributes using
restaurant data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116:31, 15447-15452. [Crossref]
629. Mario Molina, Filiz Garip. 2019. Machine Learning for Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 45:1,
27-45. [Crossref]
630. Patrick Doupe, James Faghmous, Sanjay Basu. 2019. Machine Learning for Health Services
Researchers. Value in Health 22:7, 808-815. [Crossref]
631. Charles P. Martin-Shields, Wolfgang Stojetz. 2019. Food security and conflict: Empirical challenges
and future opportunities for research and policy making on food security and conflict. World
Development 119, 150-164. [Crossref]
632. Michael J. Weir, Thomas W. Sproul. 2019. Identifying Drivers of Genetically Modified Seafood
Demand: Evidence from a Choice Experiment. Sustainability 11:14, 3934. [Crossref]
633. Anja Lambrecht, Catherine Tucker. 2019. Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study of Apparent
Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads. Management Science 65:7,
2966-2981. [Crossref]
634. Ilaria Gandin, Claudio Cozza. 2019. Can we predict firms’ innovativeness? The identification of
innovation performers in an Italian region through a supervised learning approach. PLOS ONE 14:6,
e0218175. [Crossref]
635. Veni Arakelian, Petros Dellaportas, Roberto Savona, Marika Vezzoli. 2019. Sovereign risk zones in
Europe during and after the debt crisis. Quantitative Finance 19:6, 961-980. [Crossref]
636. Hamed Ghoddusi, Germán G. Creamer, Nima Rafizadeh. 2019. Machine learning in energy economics
and finance: A review. Energy Economics 81, 709-727. [Crossref]
637. Nanae Kaneko, Yasuhiro Hayashi, Yu Fujimoto. Toward Data-Driven Identification of Essential
Factors Causing Seasonal Change in Daily Electricity Demand Curves 1-6. [Crossref]
638. Henry E. Brady. 2019. The Challenge of Big Data and Data Science. Annual Review of Political Science
22:1, 297-323. [Crossref]
639. Michael Mayer, Steven C. Bourassa, Martin Hoesli, Donato Scognamiglio. 2019. Estimation and
updating methods for hedonic valuation. Journal of European Real Estate Research 12:1, 134-150.
[Crossref]
640. Ajay Agrawal, Joshua S. Gans, Avi Goldfarb. 2019. Artificial Intelligence: The Ambiguous Labor
Market Impact of Automating Prediction. Journal of Economic Perspectives 33:2, 31-50. [Abstract]
[View PDF article] [PDF with links]
641. Jens Ludwig, Sendhil Mullainathan, Jann Spiess. 2019. Augmenting Pre-Analysis Plans with Machine
Learning. AEA Papers and Proceedings 109, 71-76. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
642. Israt Jahan, Sayeed Z. Sajal, Kendall E. Nygard. Prediction Model Using Recurrent Neural Networks
1-6. [Crossref]
643. Cristobal Young. 2019. The Difference Between Causal Analysis and Predictive Models: Response to
“Comment on Young and Holsteen (2017)”. Sociological Methods & Research 48:2, 431-447. [Crossref]
644. Gyeongcheol Cho, Jinyeong Yim, Younyoung Choi, Jungmin Ko, Seoung-Hwan Lee. 2019. Review of
Machine Learning Algorithms for Diagnosing Mental Illness. Psychiatry Investigation 16:4, 262-269.
[Crossref]
645. Morgan R. Frank, David Autor, James E. Bessen, Erik Brynjolfsson, Manuel Cebrian, David J.
Deming, Maryann Feldman, Matthew Groh, José Lobo, Esteban Moro, Dashun Wang, Hyejin Youn,
Iyad Rahwan. 2019. Toward understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on labor. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences 116:14, 6531-6539. [Crossref]
646. Paolo Brunori, Vito Peragine, Laura Serlenga. 2019. Upward and downward bias when measuring
inequality of opportunity. Social Choice and Welfare 52:4, 635-661. [Crossref]
647. Yogi Sugiawan, Shunsuke Managi. 2019. New evidence of energy-growth nexus from inclusive wealth.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 103, 40-48. [Crossref]
648. Dario Sansone. 2019. Beyond Early Warning Indicators: High School Dropout and Machine Learning.
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 81:2, 456-485. [Crossref]
649. Hilal Atasoy, Brad N. Greenwood, Jeffrey Scott McCullough. 2019. The Digitization of Patient Care:
A Review of the Effects of Electronic Health Records on Health Care Quality and Utilization. Annual
Review of Public Health 40:1, 487-500. [Crossref]
650. Jeanine Miklós-Thal, Catherine Tucker. 2019. Collusion by Algorithm: Does Better Demand
Prediction Facilitate Coordination Between Sellers?. Management Science 65:4, 1552-1561. [Crossref]
651. Colin F. Camerer, Gideon Nave, Alec Smith. 2019. Dynamic Unstructured Bargaining with Private
Information: Theory, Experiment, and Outcome Prediction via Machine Learning. Management
Science 65:4, 1867-1890. [Crossref]
652. John Gathergood, Neale Mahoney, Neil Stewart, Jörg Weber. 2019. How Do Individuals Repay Their
Debt? The Balance-Matching Heuristic. American Economic Review 109:3, 844-875. [Abstract] [View
653. Alois Weigand. 2019. Machine learning in empirical asset pricing. Financial Markets and Portfolio
Management 33:1, 93-104. [Crossref]
654. Wen Jiang, Xianjun Xing, Shan Li, Xianwen Zhang, Wenquan Wang. 2019. Synthesis, characterization
and machine learning based performance prediction of straw activated carbon. Journal of Cleaner
Production 212, 1210-1223. [Crossref]
655. Jinu Lee. 2019. A Neural Network Method for Nonlinear Time Series Analysis. Journal of Time
Series Econometrics 11:1. . [Crossref]
656. Georg Rauter, Nicolas Gerig, Roland Sigrist, Robert Riener, Peter Wolf. 2019. When a robot teaches
humans: Automated feedback selection accelerates motor learning. Science Robotics 4:27. . [Crossref]
657. Nicholas Apergis, Ioannis Pragidis. 2019. Stock Price Reactions to Wire News from the European
Central Bank: Evidence from Changes in the Sentiment Tone and International Market Indexes.
International Advances in Economic Research 25:1, 91-112. [Crossref]
658. Shangran Li. 2019. Research on Data Mining Technology Based on Machine Learning Algorithm.
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1168, 032132. [Crossref]
659. Pushpendra Rana, Daniel C Miller. 2019. Machine learning to analyze the social-ecological impacts
of natural resource policy: insights from community forest management in the Indian Himalaya.
Environmental Research Letters 14:2, 024008. [Crossref]
660. Arun Balakrishna, Tom Gross. Towards Optimum Integration of Human and Car Navigation System
1-8. [Crossref]
661. Hao Li, Haw Yang. 2019. Statistical Learning of Discrete States in Time Series. The Journal of Physical
Chemistry B 123:3, 689-701. [Crossref]
662. Yan Liu, Tian Xie. 2019. Machine learning versus econometrics: prediction of box office. Applied
Economics Letters 26:2, 124-130. [Crossref]
663. Jorge Iván Pérez-Rave, Juan Carlos Correa-Morales, Favián González-Echavarría. 2019. A machine
learning approach to big data regression analysis of real estate prices for inferential and predictive
purposes. Journal of Property Research 36:1, 59-96. [Crossref]
664. Peng Yaohao, Pedro Henrique Melo Albuquerque. 2019. Non-Linear Interactions and Exchange Rate
Prediction: Empirical Evidence Using Support Vector Regression. Applied Mathematical Finance 26:1,
69-100. [Crossref]
665. Wen Jiang, Xianjun Xing, Xianwen Zhang, Mengxing Mi. 2019. Prediction of combustion activation
energy of NaOH/KOH catalyzed straw pyrolytic carbon based on machine learning. Renewable Energy
130, 1216-1225. [Crossref]
666. Halgurd S. Maghdid. 2019. Web News Mining Using New Features: A Comparative Study. IEEE
Access 7, 5626-5641. [Crossref]
667. K. John McConnell, Stephan Lindner. 2019. Estimating treatment effects with machine learning.
Health Services Research 54:6, 1273. [Crossref]
668. Christopher Münch, Rajendra Bishnoi, Mehdi B. Tahoori. Reliable in-memory neuromorphic
computing using spintronics 230-236. [Crossref]
669. Manuel J. García Rodríguez, Vicente Rodríguez Montequín, Francisco Ortega Fernández, Joaquín M.
Villanueva Balsera. 2019. Public Procurement Announcements in Spain: Regulations, Data Analysis,
and Award Price Estimator Using Machine Learning. Complexity 2019, 1. [Crossref]
670. Ian Lundberg, Arvind Narayanan, Karen Levy, Matthew J. Salganik. 2019. Privacy, Ethics, and Data
Access: A Case Study of the Fragile Families Challenge. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic
World 5, 237802311881302. [Crossref]
671. Alexander T. Kindel, Vineet Bansal, Kristin D. Catena, Thomas H. Hartshorne, Kate Jaeger,
Dawn Koffman, Sara McLanahan, Maya Phillips, Shiva Rouhani, Ryan Vinh, Matthew J. Salganik.
2019. Improving Metadata Infrastructure for Complex Surveys: Insights from the Fragile Families
Challenge. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 5, 237802311881737. [Crossref]
672. Thomas Davidson. 2019. Black-Box Models and Sociological Explanations: Predicting High School
Grade Point Average Using Neural Networks. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 5,
237802311881770. [Crossref]
673. Daniel E. Rigobon, Eaman Jahani, Yoshihiko Suhara, Khaled AlGhoneim, Abdulaziz Alghunaim,
Alex “Sandy” Pentland, Abdullah Almaatouq. 2019. Winning Models for Grade Point Average, Grit,
and Layoff in the Fragile Families Challenge. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 5,
237802311882041. [Crossref]
674. Matthew J. Salganik, Ian Lundberg, Alexander T. Kindel, Sara McLanahan. 2019. Introduction to
the Special Collection on the Fragile Families Challenge. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic
World 5, 237802311987158. [Crossref]
675. Hellen Geremias dos Santos, Carla Ferreira do Nascimento, Rafael Izbicki, Yeda Aparecida de Oliveira
Duarte, Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto Filho. 2019. Machine learning para análises preditivas em
saúde: exemplo de aplicação para predizer óbito em idosos de São Paulo, Brasil. Cadernos de Saúde
Pública 35:7. . [Crossref]
676. Khashayar Khosravi, Gregory Lewis, Vasilis Syrgkanis. 2019. Non-Parametric Inference Adaptive to
Intrinsic Dimension. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
677. Jens Prufer, Patricia Prufer. 2019. Data Science for Entrepreneurship Research: Studying Demand
Dynamics for Entrepreneurial Skills in the Netherlands. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
678. Saqib Aziz, Michael M. Dowling, Helmi Hammami, Anke Piepenbrink. 2019. Machine Learning in
Finance: A Topic Modeling Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
679. Ajay Agrawal, Joshua S. Gans, Avi Goldfarb. 2019. Artificial Intelligence: The Ambiguous Labor
Market Impact of Automating Prediction. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
680. Costanza Naguib. 2019. Estimating the Heterogeneous Impact of the Free Movement of Persons on
Relative Wage Mobility. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
681. Andreas Joseph. 2019. Shapley Regressions: A Framework for Statistical Inference on Machine
Learning Models. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
682. Dashan Huang, Fuwei Jiang, Guoshi Tong, Guofu Zhou. 2019. Scaled PCA: A New Approach to
Dimension Reduction. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
683. Marcos López de Prado. 2019. Ten Applications of Financial Machine Learning. SSRN Electronic
Journal . [Crossref]
684. Christophre Georges, Javier Pereira. 2019. Market Stability with Machine Learning Agents. SSRN
685. George G. Judge. 2019. Combining the Information From Econometrics Learning (EL) and Machine
Learning (ML). SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
686. Qi Wu, Xing Yan. 2019. Quantile Forecast via Serial Dependence Learning. SSRN Electronic Journal
25. . [Crossref]
687. Nicolas Apfel. 2019. Relaxing the Exclusion Restriction in Shift-Share Instrumental Variable
Estimation. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
688. Aparna Gupta, Abena Owusu. 2019. Identifying the Risk Culture of Banks Using Machine Learning.
SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
689. Stefania Albanesi, Domonkos Vamossy. 2019. Predicting Consumer Default: A Deep Learning
690. Simon Schmickler. 2019. Asset Fire Sales or Assets on Fire?. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
691. Yanhao Wei, Zhenling Jiang. 2019. Estimating Parameters of Structural Models Using Neural
Networks. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
692. Brett R. Gordon, Mitch Lovett, Bowen Luo, James Reeder. 2019. Disentangling the Effects of Ad
Tone on Voter Turnout and Candidate Choice in Presidential Elections. SSRN Electronic Journal 47. .
[Crossref]
693. Prasanna L. Tantri. 2019. Does Skillful Use of Hard Information by Machines Outperform a
Combination of Hard and Soft Information of Loan Officers in Lending Decisions?. SSRN Electronic
694. Vasilios Plakandaras, Periklis Gogas, Theophilos Papadimitriou. 2019. The Effects of Geopolitical
Uncertainty in Forecasting Financial Markets: A Machine Learning Approach. Algorithms 12:1, 1.
[Crossref]
695. Stephane Helleringer, Chong You, Laurence Fleury, Laetitia Douillot, Insa Diouf, Cheikh Tidiane
Ndiaye, Valerie Delaunay, Rene Vidal. 2019. Improving age measurement in low- and middle-income
countries through computer vision: A test in Senegal. Demographic Research 40, 219-260. [Crossref]
696. Alexandre Rubesam. 2019. Machine Learning Portfolios with Equal Risk Contributions. SSRN
697. Alex Xi He, Daniel le Maire. 2019. Mergers and Managers: Manager-Specific Wage Premiums and
Rent Extraction in M&As. SSRN Electronic Journal 67. . [Crossref]
698. Oleg Rytchkov, Xun Zhong. 2019. Macroeconomic Content of Characteristics-Based Asset Pricing
Models: A Machine Learning Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal 69. . [Crossref]
699. Xinni Cai, Fuxiu Jiang, Jun-Koo Kang. 2019. Remote Board Meetings and Board Monitoring
Effectiveness: Evidence from China. SSRN Electronic Journal 46. . [Crossref]
700. F. Douglas Foster, Xue-Zhong 'Tony' He, Junqing Kang, Shen Lin. 2019. The Microstructure of
Endogenous Liquidity Provision. SSRN Electronic Journal 121. . [Crossref]
701. Jennifer Ifft, Ryan Kuhns, Kevin Patrick. 2018. Can machine learning improve prediction – an
application with farm survey data. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 21:8,
1083-1098. [Crossref]
702. Fritz Schiltz, Paolo Sestito, Tommaso Agasisti, Kristof De Witte. 2018. The added value of more
accurate predictions for school rankings. Economics of Education Review 67, 207-215. [Crossref]
703. Monica Andini, Emanuele Ciani, Guido de Blasio, Alessio D'Ignazio, Viola Salvestrini. 2018.
Targeting with machine learning: An application to a tax rebate program in Italy. Journal of Economic
Behavior & Organization 156, 86-102. [Crossref]
704. Marco Pangallo, Michele Loberto. 2018. Home is where the ad is: online interest proxies housing
demand. EPJ Data Science 7:1. . [Crossref]
705. Alex Coad, Dominik Janzing, Paul Nightingale. 2018. Tools for causal inference from cross-sectional
innovation surveys with continuous or discrete variables: Theory and applications. Cuadernos de
Economía 37:75, 779-808. [Crossref]
706. Joseph R. Cimpian, Jennifer D. Timmer, Michelle A. Birkett, Rachel L. Marro, Blair C. Turner,
Gregory L. Phillips. 2018. Bias From Potentially Mischievous Responders on Large-Scale Estimates
of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, or Questioning (LGBQ)–Heterosexual Youth Health Disparities. American
Journal of Public Health 108:S4, S258-S265. [Crossref]
707. William P. Erchul, Aaron J. Fischer, Melissa A. Collier-Meek, Bradley S. Bloomfield. 2018.
Highlighting the Utility of the Consultation Analysis Record for Consultation Research and Training.
Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation 28:4, 445-459. [Crossref]
708. Simon Willcock, Javier Martínez-López, Danny A.P. Hooftman, Kenneth J. Bagstad, Stefano Balbi,
Alessia Marzo, Carlo Prato, Saverio Sciandrello, Giovanni Signorello, Brian Voigt, Ferdinando Villa,
James M. Bullock, Ioannis N. Athanasiadis. 2018. Machine learning for ecosystem services. Ecosystem
Services 33, 165-174. [Crossref]
709. M. Hino, E. Benami, N. Brooks. 2018. Machine learning for environmental monitoring. Nature
Sustainability 1:10, 583-588. [Crossref]
710. Gilles Bastin, Paola Tubaro. 2018. Le moment big data des sciences sociales. Revue française de sociologie
Vol. 59:3, 375-394. [Crossref]
711. Chiara Masci, Geraint Johnes, Tommaso Agasisti. 2018. Student and school performance across
countries: A machine learning approach. European Journal of Operational Research 269:3, 1072-1085.
[Crossref]
712. Alberto Abadie, Matias D. Cattaneo. 2018. Econometric Methods for Program Evaluation. Annual
Review of Economics 10:1, 465-503. [Crossref]
713. Jiaying Kou, Xiaoming Fu, Jiahua Du, Hua Wang, Geordie Z. Zhang. Understanding Housing Market
Behaviour from a Microscopic Perspective 1-9. [Crossref]
714. Francesco Lamperti, Andrea Roventini, Amir Sani. 2018. Agent-based model calibration using
machine learning surrogates. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 90, 366-389. [Crossref]
715. Daniel P. Tabor, Loïc M. Roch, Semion K. Saikin, Christoph Kreisbeck, Dennis Sheberla, Joseph
H. Montoya, Shyam Dwaraknath, Muratahan Aykol, Carlos Ortiz, Hermann Tribukait, Carlos
Amador-Bedolla, Christoph J. Brabec, Benji Maruyama, Kristin A. Persson, Alán Aspuru-Guzik.
2018. Accelerating the discovery of materials for clean energy in the era of smart automation. Nature
Reviews Materials 3:5, 5-20. [Crossref]
716. Andrew Crane‐Droesch. 2018. Technology Diffusion, Outcome Variability, and Social Learning:
Evidence from a Field Experiment in Kenya. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 100:3,
955-974. [Crossref]
717. Tom Wilson, Huw Brokensha, Francisco Rowe, Ludi Simpson. 2018. Insights from the Evaluation of
Past Local Area Population Forecasts. Population Research and Policy Review 37:1, 137-155. [Crossref]
718. Michał Żejmo, Marek Kowal, Józef Korbicz, Roman Monczak. Nuclei Recognition Using
Convolutional Neural Network and Hough Transform 316-327. [Crossref]
719. Yong Yoon. Spatial Choice Modeling Using the Support Vector Machine (SVM): Characterization
and Prediction 767-778. [Crossref]
720. William Herlands, Edward McFowland III, Andrew Gordon Wilson, Daniel B. Neill. Automated
Local Regression Discontinuity Design Discovery 1512-1520. [Crossref]
721. Guanhao Feng, Nick Polson, Yuexi Wang, Jianeng Xu. 2018. Sparse Regularization in Marketing and
Economics. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
722. Jens Prufer, Patricia Prufer. 2018. Data Science for Institutional and Organizational Economics. SSRN
723. Shinya Sugawara. 2018. What Comprises Effective Formal Elder Care at Home? Estimating Effects
for Combinations of Multiple Services. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
724. Phanish Puranam, Yash Raj Shrestha, Vivianna Fang He, Georg von Krogh. 2018. Algorithmic
Induction Through Machine Learning: Opportunities for Management and Organization Research.
725. Marcelo Cunha Medeiros, Gabriel Vasconcelos, Alvaro Veiga, Eduardo Zilberman. 2018. Forecasting
Inflation in a Data-Rich Environment: The Benefits of Machine Learning Methods. SSRN Electronic
726. Anthony Niblett. 2018. Regulatory Reform in Ontario: Machine Learning and Regulation. SSRN
727. Marianne Bertrand, Emir Kamenica. 2018. Coming Apart? Cultural Distances in the United States
Over Time. SSRN Electronic Journal 117. . [Crossref]
728. Erik Brynjolfsson, Xiang Hui, Meng Liu. 2018. Does Machine Translation Affect International
Trade? Evidence from a Large Digital Platform. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
729. Ronald Richman. 2018. AI in Actuarial Science. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
730. Benjamin Bluhm. 2018. Time Series Econometrics at Scale: A Practical Guide to Parallel Computing
in (Py)Spark. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
731. Daniele Bianchi, Matthias Büchner, Andrea Tamoni. 2018. Bond Risk Premia with Machine
Learning. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
732. Isil Erel, Lea Henny Stern, Chenhao Tan, Michael S. Weisbach. 2018. Selecting Directors Using
Machine Learning. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
733. Yingying Fan, Jinchi Lv, Jingbo Wang. 2018. DNN: A Two-Scale Distributional Tale of
Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Inference. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
734. Dimitris Korobilis. 2018. Machine Learning Macroeconometrics: A Primer. SSRN Electronic Journal
201. . [Crossref]
735. Prithwiraj Choudhury, Ryan Allen, Michael Endres. 2018. Developing Theory Using Machine
Learning Methods. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
736. Marco Pangallo, Michele Loberto. 2018. Home Is Where the Ad Is: Online Interest Proxies Housing
Demand. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
737. Tingting Liu, Zhongjin Lu, Tao Shu, Fengrong Wei. 2018. Distinct Relatedness and Synergies in
Mergers and Acquisitions. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
738. Andres Liberman, Christopher Neilson, Luis Opazo, Seth D. Zimmerman. 2018. The Equilibrium
Effects of Information Deletion: Evidence from Consumer Credit Markets. SSRN Electronic Journal
. [Crossref]
739. Jeanine Miklós-Thal, Catherine E. Tucker. 2018. Collusion by Algorithm: Does Better Demand
Prediction Facilitate Coordination Between Sellers?. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
740. Jack Blundell, Erling Risa. 2018. Do Rank-Rank Income Mobility Measures Fully Capture Broader
Parental Influence on Child Income?. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
741. Germán G. Creamer, Hamed Ghoddusi, Nima Rafizadeh. 2018. Machine Learning in Energy
Economics and Finance: A Review. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
742. Julian TszKin Chan, Weifeng Zhong. 2018. Reading China: Predicting Policy Change with Machine
743. Yannan (Lily) Shen. 2018. Information Value of Property Description: A Machine Learning
744. Chinmay Kakatkar, Volker Bilgram, Johann Füller. 2018. Innovation Analytics: Leveraging Artificial
Intelligence in the Innovation Process. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
745. Khaled Obaid, Kuntara Pukthuanthong. 2018. A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words: Market
Sentiment From Photos. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
746. Michael Mayer, Steven C. Bourassa, Martin Edward Ralph Hoesli, Donato Flavio Scognamiglio. 2018.
Estimation and Updating Methods for Hedonic Valuation. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
747. Derek Snow. 2018. Predicting Restaurant Facility Closures. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
748. Andrew Bell, Jennifer Zavaleta Cheek, Frazer Mataya, Patrick Ward. 2018. Do As They Did: Peer
Effects Explain Adoption of Conservation Agriculture in Malawi. Water 10:1, 51. [Crossref]
749. Futoshi Narita, Rujun Yin. 2018. In Search of Information:. IMF Working Papers 18:286, 1. [Crossref]
750. Xuezhong He, Shen Lin. 2018. Rational Learning and Trading Behavior in Limit Order Markets.
751. David M. Reeb, Wanli Zhao. 2018. Dissecting Innovation. SSRN Electronic Journal 103. . [Crossref]
752. Oz Shy. 2018. Alternative Methods for Studying Consumer Payment Choice. SSRN Electronic Journal
105. . [Crossref]
753. Etan A Green. 2017. Bayesian Instinct. SSRN Electronic Journal 136. . [Crossref]
754. Francesco Lamperti, Amir Sani. 2017. Agent-Based Model Calibration Using Machine Learning
Surrogates. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
755. Charles Martin-Shields, Wolfgang Stojetz. 2017. Food Security As Peacebuilding: Analyzing the
Relationship between Food Security and Conflict Data to Support Empirical Policy Making. SSRN
756. Ethan M.J. Lieber. 2017. Targeting with In-Kind Transfers: Evidence from Medicaid Home Care.
757. Christos Andreas Makridis. 2017. Does Culture Pay? Compensating Differentials, Job Satisfaction,
and Organizational Practices. SSRN Electronic Journal 4. . [Crossref]
758. Chiranjit Chakraborty, Andreas Joseph. 2017. Machine Learning at Central Banks. SSRN Electronic
759. Jonathan Aaron Cook, Saad Siddiqui. 2017. Random Forests and Selected Samples. SSRN Electronic
760. Andrew B. Martinez. 2017. How Quickly Can We Adapt to Change? An Assessment Of Hurricane
Damage Mitigation Efforts Using Forecast Uncertainty. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
761. Andreas Fuster, Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham, Tarun Ramadorai, Ansgar Walther. 2017. Predictably
Unequal? The Effects of Machine Learning on Credit Markets. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
762. Monica Andini, Emanuele Ciani, Guido de Blasio, Alessio D'Ignazio, Viola Salvestrini. 2017.
Targeting Policy-Compliers with Machine Learning: An Application to a Tax Rebate Programme in
Italy. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
763. Daniel Martin Katz, Michael James Bommarito, Josh Blackman. 2017. Crowdsourcing Accurately and
Robustly Predicts Supreme Court Decisions. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
764. Arno Parolini, Wei Wu Tan, Aron Shlonsky. 2017. A Blueprint for Causal Inference in
Implementation Systems. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
765. Stuart A. Gabriel, Matteo M. Iacoviello. 2016. A Crisis of Missed Opportunities? Foreclosure Costs
and Mortgage Modification During the Great Recession. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
766. Anja Lambrecht, Catherine E. Tucker. 2016. Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study into Apparent
Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads. SSRN Electronic Journal 3. .
[Crossref]
767. Hui Chen, Winston Wei Dou, Leonid Kogan. 2013. Measuring the 'Dark Matter' in Asset Pricing
Models. SSRN Electronic Journal 71. . [Crossref]

Jep 31 2 87

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Jep 31 2 87

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Jep 31 2 87

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 31, Number 2—Spring 2017—Pages 87–106

Machine Learning: An Applied

Sendhil Mullainathan and Jann Spiess

How Machine Learning Works

Prediction performance (R 2) Relative improvement over ordinary least

procedures work, we will focus in depth on a comparison of ordinary least squares

From Linear Least-Squares to Regression Trees

Yes Type = 2,3,7 No

Baths < 1.5 Baths < 1.5

9.2 9.8 9.8 10.5 11.6 11.9 12.2 12.8

The Secret Sauce

Most of Machine Learning in One Expression 6

Function class ​​ (and its parametrization) Regularizer ​R( f )​

Quantifying Predictive Performance

function is a straightforward task of mean estimation: the distribution of realized

What Do We (Not) Learn from Machine Learning Output?

Parameter in the linear model

coefficients can produce similar prediction quality. As a result, how an algorithm

Recovering Structure: Estimation (​​β ˆ ​​) vs Prediction ( ​​y

How Machine Learning Can Be Applied

Our starting point for applications of machine learning algorithms is guided

Prediction in the Service of Estimation

top-down, theory-driven, deductive reasoning. At the same time, other approaches

124(5): 1423–65. Medicine 29(3): 337–46.

You might also like

Function class  (and its parametrization) Regularizer R( f )

Recovering Structure: Estimation (β  ˆ ) vs Prediction ( y 