Approach To Teach Financial Literacy
Approach To Teach Financial Literacy
Approach To Teach Financial Literacy
32.1 Introduction
Financial literacy has become the focus of active research in recent years. The
reason for its increased importance as a knowledge domain and research subject is
the ever more complicated economic landscape brought about by globalization and
the development of financial services sector. For this chapter, financial literacy can
be defined as ‘a combination of awareness, knowledge, skill, attitude and behaviour
necessary to make sound financial decisions and ultimately achieve individual
financial wellbeing’ (OECD INFE 2011, p. 3). As Lusardi et al. (2010) highlighted,
in today’s world people become consumers and have to make financial decisions at
young ages, with financial services being accessible even to school children. This is
especially true of high-income economies, like Singapore’s. This chapter traces
Singapore’s success story of how financial literacy, which was non-existent a
decade ago, is now part and parcel of Singapore schools’ programmes.
Although it is often assumed that most people know the basics of managing money,
statistics suggest otherwise. Studies investigating financial knowledge and financial
behaviour of young people (mainly young adults of college age) starting from
Danes and Hira’s (1987) pioneering effort, consistently showed that this demo-
graphic group lacks financial sophistication necessary for effective functioning in
modern societies, such as in-depth knowledge about credit, insurance and invest-
ment. These findings were corroborated by a host of other studies probing the
knowledge about personal investment, credit and financial risks among the young
people (e.g. Markovich and DeVaney 1997; Chen and Volpe 1998; Avard et al.
2005). Beal and Delpachitra (2003) surveyed college students in another high-
income economy, Australia, and found generally low levels of financial literacy.
Summarizing the extensive research on levels of financial literacy and their relation
to age, Xu and Zia (2012) demonstrate that this relation forms an ‘inverted U-
shape’, with younger demographic being one of the two age groups showing
inadequate grasp of financial matters.
Even more disturbing were the findings of Henry et al. (2001), which showed
that less than a half of the US college students in their study reported keeping a
budget on a regular basis. Thus, young people not only lack essential knowledge of
financial matters, they also do not possess the necessary habits that enable efficient
money management. These findings are echoed by Joo et al. (2003) who discovered
that about a half of the college students in their sample had accumulated rollover
credit card debt, with another 40 % being unaware of the interest rate charged on
their credit card debt. The Monetary Authority of Singapore reported in 2010 that
young people aged 21–29 represented a disproportionate 39 % of frequent revol-
vers, i.e. those who left their credit card bills unpaid for more than 30 days.
According to another set of data from DP Credit Bureau (2012), 6 % of credit users
aged from 21 to 30 defaults on their credit repayments as compared to 2.7 % for the
Singaporean population as a whole. For credit card debts the figures are similar,
with 6.3 and 3.3 % of defaulters, respectively. These findings show that adolescents
and young adults entering the workforce possess inadequate levels of financial
literacy and lack the necessary habits not just for achieving long-term saving goals
and financial well-being, but even for everyday money management.
32 Approaches to Teaching Financial Literacy … 501
As it is evident from the troubling statistics on rising consumer debt and personal
bankruptcies, financial literacy education has become a sine qua non for successful
functioning in modern societies. Assessing the impact of financial literacy pro-
grammes, many studies showed that financial literacy education focused on such
important topics as saving, prudent spending, medium- and long-term financial
planning, credit management improved not only the programme assessment scores,
but knowledge, skills and behaviours as well (Asarta et al. 2014; Borden et al.
2008; Bowen and Jones 2006; Danes 2004; Danes and Haberman 2007; Fox et al.
2005; Furtuna 2008; Jump$tart Coalition 1997, 2000, 2002, 2004; Mandell 2006a;
Tennyson and Nguyen 2001; Varcoe et al. 2005; Walstad et al. 2010). This is true
even of short financial literacy interventions that have been shown to have a pos-
itive impact on cognitive and aff ective measures (Fox et al. 2005). Nevertheless,
Mandell (2006b, c, 2009) reported that full-time high school and college personal
finance courses had negligible impact on the participants’ financial literacy.
Mandell and Klein (2007) concluded that the lack of motivation was primarily
responsible for such an outcome due to the fact that the content of the courses did
not have direct relevance to financial decisions made by the students in real life
focusing instead on investment strategies and retirement planning. Beck and Neiser
(2009) argue that the content of financial literacy courses should be directly relevant
to the students’ needs for them to successfully retain and implement the knowledge
they acquire in these courses. When the topics taught are adapted to students’
interests, financial literacy scores show marked increase (Bowen and Jones 2006).
Financial education programmes therefore should strive not for maximal syllabus
coverage but for helping adolescents and young adults in tackling real challenges in
making day-to-day monetary decisions.
As soon as the Hub was established, it was clear that financial literacy pro-
grammes should not be too technical. Instead, the emphasis should be placed on
back-to-basics issues, and the foundation of financial literacy programmes should
be values-based financial education. Prudent money management, goal setting,
meticulous tracking of expenses, and discipline in keeping to budget and long-term
financial planning do require acquisition of a set of techniques, but before such
techniques can be put to use, it is necessary to possess the right values, mindset and
habits, something that is acquired at an early age. Inculcating habitual saving early
in life translates into efficient consumption later. It is achieved through imbibing the
right values (savings, managing and sharing) and understanding how these values
permeate everyday monetary transactions (Koh 2005, 2009).
Financial literacy education should ideally start not from adolescence but much
earlier. Bucciol and Veronesi (2013) suggested in their research that savings edu-
cation received during childhood translates into beneficial savings behaviours in
adulthood. Another important goal of financial literacy education is inculcating
beneficial habits from a young age. These habits are rooted in general psychosocial
make-up that is malleable and amenable to pedagogical interventions, including those
interventions that are conducted during financial literacy programmes in schools.
In a 30-year longitudinal study with 1000 New Zealand children tracked from
birth to maturity, Moffitt (2012) showed that lack of self-control during childhood
502 N.K. Koh
Promoting financial literacy education in schools starts with personal and profes-
sional development programmes for teachers.
i. Personal Finance Seminars
Personal Finance Seminars guide teachers to manage their personal finances
effectively. Topics include budgeting, credit management, risk planning and
retirement planning. Acquiring the skills and knowledge necessary for suc-
cessful financial management, as well as awareness of financial issues, prepares
the teachers to promote financial literacy to their students and enhances their
readiness to teach financial literacy. Recently, the Hub has partnered the
504 N.K. Koh
Apart from teacher training, curriculum development is where the Hub applies most
of its expertise. The Hub’s financial literacy packages focus on authentic lessons
that are most relevant to primary and secondary school students, namely, basic
money management and financial planning.
The basis of the financial literacy curriculum is built upon the key messages in
economic literacy. It is important to be mindful of the scarcity of resources and that
wants are unlimited; to ensure optimal allocation of resources, there is a need to
differentiate between needs and wants and to understand that there is opportunity
costs incurred with each decision. In addition, it is important to prioritize and
balance expenditure with income to preserve and improve the quality of life. Hence,
it is important for the child to learn how to manage their day-to-day money deci-
sions by understanding the factors that influence his desires and learning to plan so
that he can be in a better position to optimize his limited resources. He should also
know what alternatives are available and understand that he can only spend within
his means. With this knowledge, it is less likely that he will be an impulsive spender
of limited funds and hence, be more responsible. Table 32.1 summarizes the themes
for critical understanding in financial literacy and the key standards to be
developed.
32 Approaches to Teaching Financial Literacy … 505
Table 32.1 From economic literacy to financial literacy: critical understanding and standards
Economic literacy messages Financial literacy—critical Standards
understanding
Resources are limited and have Personal resources are limited Managing the
to be allocated through various and have to be allocated for day-to-day money
mechanisms, including pricing, different purposes. Hence we decisions
queuing or rationing and must plan the use of resources
taxation to enjoy the maximum benefits
Government expenditure comes Personal present expenditure Understanding the
from current or future tax comes from income that is different sources of
revenue earned in the past (savings), finance, their benefits
present and future. Hence we to risks
must ensure the expenditures
are met by income earned
Economic stability is achieved Personal financial stability and Save and plan for the
through high savings, low well-being is achieved through future
inflation and stable exchange adequate personal savings and
rates financial planning. Hence we
must take the long-term view in
making financial decisions to
preserve and improve the
quality of life
The standards define the key learning outcomes, which, in turn, specify the
attitudes, skills, knowledge, and values to be imparted to learners. The premise is
that the right attitude towards financial literacy leads the student to seek knowledge
and skills, and undergirding these decisions and dispositions are the values.
The knowledge, skills, values and attitudes that should be taught and developed
are then specified to ensure that the key learning outcomes will be achieved. These
include knowledge related to factors affecting purchasing decisions, as well as the
impact of purchasing decisions, not just on the self and the community, but also the
environment. This helps nurture responsible consumer decision-making and con-
tributes towards character development. In addition, the child will also learn to plan
for the short and long term and to defer current satisfaction of wants for future
benefits. These knowledge, skills and values are further organized into three themes
—Save, Manage and Share—to facilitate the infusion of financial literacy into the
core and non-core curriculum in schools. These are summarized in Table 32.2.
500 FCE teachers attended professional development courses run by NIE and
became the agents of change for new modes of learning and content delivery.
The Financial Literacy Hub for Teachers has been active in promoting mixed mode
delivery since its launch. Financial literacy education is inherently multidisciplinary
and applied in nature, and this calls for engaging and authentic pedagogy.
Transforming learning environment to encourage self-directed learning and peer
collaboration is an important part of the Hub’s programmes. The teaching and
learning resources are shared in the form of e-books. This helps create a community
of practice comprising networks of educators who actively use the resources and
contribute to their development. To encourage students’ self-directed learning, the
Hub uses the flipped classroom framework. Using ePub, students can collaborate on
and annotate the learning resources. Learners thus acquire a sense of psychological
ownership of the content rarely achievable in teacher-centred learning environ-
ments. The Hub also uses Google and Apple’s iTunes U platforms for content
delivery.
The Hub has been organizing zonal and cluster events at the end of the semester
to supplement its lessons in class. At these events, for which the Hub’s partner
schools become centres, activities, such as games, competitions, carnivals and
camps are organized to motivate the students to acquire financial knowledge and
beneficial money management habits. Games and role-playing activities have
always been part of these events and proved to be both pedagogically effective and
engaging for the participants. The Hub also organizes events for post-secondary
(polytechnic, junior college) and tertiary students that include board game com-
petitions at national level. Mobile learning platforms and mobile games are offered
to schools to enhance teaching and learning. For authentic learning in primary
schools, the mShopper mobile application, which encourages collaborative learn-
ing, was designed by the Hub. The students learn how to spend within their budget
and make prudent consumer choices by not succumbing to common marketing
ploys. Thus, gamification has been successfully used in the Hub’s programmes to
help students acquire the necessary skills and values in realistic settings. Financial
literacy-infused FCE programmes have especially benefitted from deploying digital
games and simulations. The concept of a mobile learning trail has proven to be very
successful, and is now used in programmes that target all levels, from primary to
secondary, as well as tertiary students. The most recent development is the SG50
Entrepreneurs Trail that is designed for primary and secondary school students in
celebration of the 50th anniversary of Singapore’s independence in order for them
to appreciate the role of entrepreneurship in Singapore’s economic history and in
society in general, entrepreneurial values, and the importance of financial literacy.
510 N.K. Koh
32.7 Research
Research has been an integral part of the Hub’s activities from the very beginning.
The need for programme evaluation led to prioritizing research to design pro-
grammes that are scalable. When the Hub was just launched, it carried out a
baseline survey to better understand the training needs of teachers and students, and
there is ongoing study to investigate the impact of the programmes offered by the
Hub and her partner schools. The research objectives were to explore teachers’ and
students’ attitudes and perceptions towards financial literacy and the usefulness of
financial literacy programmes, track progress of the implementation of financial
literacy programmes, and identify key priorities for improvement. Both quantitative
and qualitative methods were used in the study in 2008–2009, which involved 5055
secondary students and 1056 teachers from 70 schools in Singapore. A follow-up
study was conducted in 2010 with 141 teachers from 81 schools on the progress of
implementation of financial literacy programmes in the schools after attending the
Hub’s training programmes. A marked increase has been found in the positive
attitudes towards and perception of the importance of financial literacy, as well as a
better understanding of financial concepts such as saving and budgeting. Teachers
have also rated highly the usefulness of the workshops and teaching materials. The
results of these studies were reported in Teo et al. (2011); Koh (2012); Lee et al.
(2012); Koh and Fraser (2014). All the events and programmes organized by the
Hub include surveys and focus group discussions with participants to assess the
impact thereof.
32.8 Conclusions
Since its launch, the Financial Literacy Hub for teachers has trained 11,000 teachers
and tutors in Singapore. These include school leaders and teachers who have been
trained in personal finance, in-service school teachers, pre-service school teachers
and self-help group tutors who have received training in pedagogy for teaching
financial literacy to students. The Hub has partnered 90 schools to actively promote
financial education to their teachers and students using a whole-school approach
and organized over 430 events. An estimated number of 320,000 students, parents
and teachers from more than 300 schools have participated in the Hub’s financial
literacy programmes and events. Within 7 years, the Hub has become the leader in
financial literacy education in Singapore despite having a relatively small staff. The
key factors behind the Hub’s impact on the financial literacy education in Singapore
can be summarized as follows:
• Engaging teachers through personal finance seminars and pedagogy workshops
to enhance their readiness to teach financial literacy and equip them with the
required knowledge and skills
32 Approaches to Teaching Financial Literacy … 511
Acknowledgements The study reported in this chapter was supported by funding from the Citi
Foundation.
References
Asarta, C. J., Hill, A. T., & Meszaros, B. (2014). The features and effectiveness of the keys to
financial success curriculum. International Review of Economics Education, 16(1), 39–50.
Avard, S., Manton, E., English, D., & Walker, J. (2005). The financial knowledge of college
freshmen. College Student Journal, 39(2), 321–338.
Beal, D. J., & Delpachitra, S. B. (2003). Financial literacy among Australian university students.
Economic Papers, 22(1), 65–78.
Beck, T., & Neiser, B. (2009). Learning and growing: Lessons learned in financial education.
Community Investments, (Sum), 11–14.
Borden, L. M., Lee, S. A., Serido, J., & Collins, D. (2008). Changing college students’ financial
knowledge, attitudes, and behavior through seminar participation. Journal of Family and
Economic Issues, 29(1), 23–40.
Bowen, C. F., & Jones, H. M. (2006). Empowering young adults to control their financial future.
Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 98(1), 33–39.
Bucciol, A., & Veronesi, M. (2013). Teaching children to save and lifetime savings: What is the
best strategy? Retrieved from http://leonardo3.dse.univr.it/home/workingpapers/saveduc.pdf
Chen, H., & Volpe, R. P. (1998). An analysis of personal financial literacy among college students.
Financial Services Review, 7(2), 107–128.
Danes, S. M. (2004). Evaluation of the NEFE high school financial planning programme 2003–
2004. Retrieved from http://hsfpp.nefe.org/loadFile.cfm?contentid=27
Danes, S. M., & Haberman, H. R. (2007). Teen financial knowledge, self-efficacy, and behavior: A
gendered view. Financial Counseling and Planning, 18(2), 48–60.
Danes, S. M., & Hira, T. K. (1987). Money management knowledge of college students. Journal
of Student Financial Aid, 17(1), 4–16.
De Grove, F., Bourgonjon, J., & Van Looy, J. (2012). Digital games in education? A contextual
approach to teachers’ adoption intention of digital games for learning purposes. Computers in
Human Behavior, 28(6), 2023–2033.
Deater-Deckard, K., Chang, M., & Evans, M. (2013). Engagement states and learning from
educational games. New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development, 139, 21–30.
512 N.K. Koh
Fox, J., Bartholomae, S., & Lee, J. (2005). Building the case for financial education. The Journal
of Consumer Affairs, 39(1), 195–214.
Fox, J., Bartholomae, S., & Trombitas, K. (2012). Evaluating financial education programs. In D.
B. Durband & S. L. Britt (Eds.), Student financial literacy: Campus-based program
development (pp. 141–166). New York, NY: Springer.
Fraser, B. J., & Tobin, K. (1991). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in classroom
environment research. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments:
Evaluation, antecedents and consequences (pp. 271–292). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
Furtuna, F. (2008). College students’ personal financial literacy: Economic impact and public
policy implications. Undergraduate Economic Review, 4(1), 1–32. (a publication of Illinois
Wesleyan University).
Henry, R. A., Weber, J. G., & Yarbrough, D. (2001). Money management practices of college
students. College Student Journal, 35(1), 6.
Inal, Y., & Cagiltay, K. (2007). Flow experiences of children in an interactive social game
environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 455–464.
Joo, S., Grable, J. E., & Bagwell, D. C. (2003). Credit card attitudes and behaviors of college
students. College Student Journal, 37(3), 1–11.
Jump$tart Coalition. (1997). High school seniors lack financial smarts, shows survey. Retrieved
from http://www.jumpstartcoalition.org/upload/news.cfm.recordid=37
Jump$tart Coalition. (2000). Financial literacy declining among 12th graders. Retrieved from
http://www.jumpstartcoalition.org/upload/news.cfm?recordid=60
Jump$tart Coalition. (2002). Personal financial survey of high school seniors: Executive summary.
Retrieved from http://www.jumpstartcoalition.org/upload/ExecutiveSummary2002.doc
Jump$tart Coalition. (2004). Financial literacy improves among nation’s high school students.
Retrieved from http://www.jumpstartcoalition.org/fileuptemp/FINAL_PR_Jump$tart_2004_S
urvey.doc
Kiili, K. (2007). Foundation for problem-based gaming. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 38(3), 394–404.
Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., & Salen, K. (2009). Moving learning games forward. Cambridge, MA:
The Education Arcade.
Koh, N. K. (2005). Positioning financial literacy in Singapore schools. Paper presented at Pacific
Circle Consortium, Sydney, Australia.
Koh, N. K. (2009) What’s actually working? Latest developments in financial education impact
assessment. Paper presented at Citi-FT Financial Education Summit, Singapore.
Koh, N. K. (2012). Investigating attitudes towards financial literacy in schools: An impact study.
Journal of Education and Vocational Research, 3(7), 204–215.
Koh, N. K., & Fraser, B. (2014). Determinants of financial attitudes among secondary-school
students in Singapore. World Studies in Education, 15(2), 41–52.
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an
inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43.
Lee, C. B., Koh, N. K., Cai, X. L., & Quek, C. L. (2012). Children’s use of metacognition in
solving everyday problems: Children’s monetary decision-making. Australia Journal of
Education, 56(1), 23–40.
Lusardi, A., Mitchell, O. S. and Curto, V. (2010). Financial Literacy among the Young. Journal of
Consumer Affairs, 44: 358–380. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2010.01173.x
Mandell, L. (2006a). Teaching young dogs old tricks: The effectiveness of FL intervention in pre-
high school grades. Paper presented at the Academy of Financial Services 2006, Annual
Conference Salt Lake City.
Mandell, L. (2006b). Financial literacy: Improving education results of the 2006 national Jump
$tart survey. Washington, DC: Jumpstart Coalition.
Mandell, L. (2006c). Financial literacy: If it’s so Important, why isn’t it improving? Networks
Financial Institute Policy Brief 2006-PB-08. Retrieved from http://www.
networksfinancialinstitute.org/Lists/Publication%20Library/Attachments/30/2006-PB-08_
Mandell.pdf
32 Approaches to Teaching Financial Literacy … 513
Mandell, L. (2009). The impact of financial education in high school and college on financial
literacy and subsequent financial decision making. Paper presented at the American Economic
Association Meetings, San Francisco, CA.
Mandell, L., & Klein, L. S. (2007). Motivation and financial literacy. Financial Services Review,
16(2007), 105–116.
Markovich, C. A., & DeVaney, S. A. (1997). College seniors’ personal finance knowledge and
practices. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 89(3), 21–28.
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244
(4907), 933–938.
Moffitt, T. (2012). Children’s self-control and the health and wealth of their nation: Tracking
1000 children from birth to maturity. Retrieved from http://www.gresham.ac.uk/lectures-and-
events/childrens-self-control-and-the-health-and-wealth-of-their-nation-tracking-1000
INFE, OECD. (2011). Measuring financial literacy: Questionnaire and guidance notes for
conducting internationally comparable survey of financial literacy. Paris: OECD.
Steinkuehler, C., Squire, K., & Barab, S. (Eds.). (2012) Games, learning and society: Learning
and meaning in a digital age. New York: Cambridge University Press
Tennyson, S., & Nguyen, C. (2001). State curriculum mandates and student knowledge of personal
finance. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(2), 241–265.
Teo, T., Koh, N. K., & Lee, C. B. (2011). Teachers’ intention to teach financial literacy in
Singapore: A path analysis of an extended theory of planned behaviour. The Asia-Pacific
Education Researcher, 20(2), 412–421.
Varcoe, K. P., Martin, A., Devitto, Z., & Go, G. (2005). Using a financial education curriculum for
teens. Association for Financial Counselling and Planning Education, 16(1), 63–71.
Walstad, W. B., Rebeck, K., & MacDonald, R. A. (2010). The effects of financial education on the
financial knowledge of high school students. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 44(2), 336–357.
Xu, L., & Zia, B. (2012). Financial Literacy around the world: An overview of the evidence with
practical suggestions for the way forward. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6107.