22naive Indoctrination 22 by Dylan Nguyen
22naive Indoctrination 22 by Dylan Nguyen
22naive Indoctrination 22 by Dylan Nguyen
Naive Indoctrination
The classic series Leave It to Beaver follows a typical family of the 1950s as they
navigate through the ups and downs of middle-class suburban life. In the provided clip, Ward
Cleaver, the patriarch of the family, explains to his son Wally, the expectations and roles women
are required to manage in a typical family as they prep for their family dinner, “it’s traditional I
guess…they say a women’s place is in the home…she might as well be in the kitchen.” This
blatant sexist comment would not pass by today’s standards, however, during the episode’s airing
in 1958, this was normalized in later years as the nuclear family, a double entendre to the
paranoia of nuclear warfare of the Cold War and a representation of the explosive toxic behavior
that presents itself within an artificial family of the 1950s. Throughout decades, gender roles
have been deeply implemented and placed in which the wife of the family fell into the
“stay-at-home mom” role, while the dad was normally crowned the “breadwinner.” Like Leave It
to Beaver, Susan Glaspell’s play, Trifles establishes a deeply engrained society in which gender
roles and expectations were seen as unbalanced. By applying a Freudian lens, specifically in
terms of the character’s id, Ego, and Superego, to Glaspell’s play Trifles, the reader can grasp the
disparity in the treatment of men and women in the early 20th century and infer the effects of
The male characters of the play display a level of sexism that is instantaneously alarming
for the audience revealing a disturbing attitude that has seemingly been normalized. The concept
of the id can be associated with the men of the story to highlight the strict enforcement and
stereotypes placed on women. Within the story, the majority of the men’s lines are either
intrusive thoughts or blatant offensive comments stemming from the id part of the brain. Defined
unorganized and emotional: ‘the realm of the illogical’ most of that is of a negative character…”
(Storr). Storr notes the primitive aspect of the id stemming from the traditional gender roles and
the structured power dynamic between men and women. This is seen through the commentary of
the county attorney as he immediately judges the role of the housewife, “Dirty towels! Not much
of a housekeeper, would you say, ladies?... I know there are some Dickson farmhouses that do
not have such roller towels” (Glaspell). To the average reader, the comment made by the county
attorney was uncalled for and outdated, however, in the historical context of the time it was
deemed “normal.” In typical fashion, these thoughts remain in the mind, yet the instinctive need
for the attorney to compare the exhaustive role of a housewife stems from the indoctrinated
belief to shame women, and the id kicking in, disregarding the consequences of his actions in a
“primitive and unorganized fashion” (Storr). In another instance, while investigating the crime
scene the sheriff made an instinctive insensitive comment, “ Well, can you beat the women! Held
the murder and worryin’ about her preserves” (Glaspell). This comment was an uncalled-for
attack on women and is clear to the audience that the gap in respect between the enforced gender
roles remains divided. This remark provides the audience with a reminder of the difference in
time this story is placed in and from contemporary standards. The important thing to note about
the id is that “the unconscious [id] knows no time but the present” (Thurswell). By understanding
that, the audience can quickly infer that these comments made by the male characters are
unaware of the consequences of their verbal actions. The id does not consider the ramifications
of their words and how they can hurt others because they are only in consideration of themselves
and fitting in with societal standards. As aforementioned, these types of comments seem
outdated but yet remain relevant in today’s time, stressing the disparity between men and women
that has been apparent in society for centuries. Glaspell’s indirect connection with the id and her
3
male characters reminds the audience that instinctive comments are not okay and must always be
challenged with the hope to mend the gap between man and woman.
By associating the male characters' instinctive thoughts as part of the id, the readers can
interpret the female characters as the counterpart to their male characters fueled by the ego,
utilized to provide a lens into the minds of women who have been mistreated through enforced
gender roles. Within psychoanalysis, the ego is recognized as the “individual’s image of himself
as a self-conscious being, his sense of himself as separate from the world which surrounds him”
(Thurshwell). The disassociation between the individual and the society that surrounds them is
imminent within the character of Mrs. Hale. Throughout the play, Mrs. Hale is actively seen
revolting against the restrictions that society and gender roles have placed on women. In a verbal
rant, Mrs. Hale complains, “[resentfully] I don’t know as there’s anything so strange, our takin’
up our time with little things while we’re waiting for them to get the evidence…I don’t see as it’s
anything to laugh about” (Glaspell). Mrs. Hale’s deep understanding of herself and her
contributions to her passions seems to be in opposition to the confines of her society. With the
constant beratement of men and suffering with impossible expectations, Mrs. Hale becomes
aware that the maltreatment of her and other women are wrong and unjust. Mrs. Hale’s ego kicks
in and actively revolts, questioning the engrained aspects of her society that fueled the male
character’s id. As aforementioned, the ego is typically paired against the id which contributes to
“the conscious in the person, that which experiences and senses the outside world and which
represents reality to the self” (Thurswell). Thurswell’s explanation of ego provides the audience
with a deeper understanding of the character of Ms. Hale. The ego in itself can be described as
“replacing the reign of the pleasure principle with that of the reality principle, imposing the
constraints of the social environment” (De Mijolla 464). With the id replaced, the ego comes in
4
and begins to question the rooted implications set by society. This is seen through Ms. Hale’s
comment on the investigation, “You know, it seems kind of sneaking. Locking her up in town
and then coming out here and trying to get her own house to turn against her” (Glaspell). The
active questioning of the processes in the government’s investigation is Mrs. Hale's active ego
kicking in. Mrs. Hale is just one of the many voices that society chooses to suppress. An
individual’s ego proves to be the part of the mind that acts on the individual while understanding
the processes in their environment. Mrs. Hales’ opposition to “consciously defy the laws laid
down by the patriarchal order and thus declare their rights as individuals and women” can be
seen as a call to action (Brown). Glaspell’s criticism of gender roles being represented through
Mrs. Hale’s verbal objection allows for inspiration for the audience to speak out against their
oppression. By understanding the operations of ego in an individual, the reader can begin to
dissect and recognize the constraints of societal’s gender roles and their negative effects in their
By pinpointing Mrs. Hale as the characterization of the ego, Mrs. Peters can be
experience due to a deeply implemented disparity between societal's gender roles. The superego
is interpreted as the “conscience [that] develops as parents insist that children conform to the
values of society” (Berk 15). The superego acts as a balancing act between the ego and the id. On
one hand, the id of an individual acts on impulses while the ego provides context that such
impulses might not be right. The superego then kicks in and takes into account both stances and
begins to act morally or what they perceive to be correct. The conflicted moral ambiguity Mrs.
Peters presents is without a doubt engrained from childhood. Berk explains the superego as
“[steming from] identifying with the same-sex parent, whose moral standards they
5
adopt…children obey the superego to avoid guilt…that arises each time they are tempted to
misbehave” (372). Taking influence from our society, Glaspell indirectly critiques the
conventions of gender roles that wrongfully become normalized. During a rant, Mrs. Hale’s
venting is extinguished by Mrs. Peters as she assures her, “Of course, it’s only no more than their
duty” (Glaspell). The nature that Mrs. Peters exhibits to take on the mediator role reveals to the
audience that her superego has taken effect. Her need to satisfy and apologetically defend the
misogynistic jokes of the male characters stems from the consistent conformity many females
endured before her time. Mrs. Peters likely took influence from the female figures of her early
life to replicate how they interacted with and accepted the wrongdoings of society, succumbing
to indoctrination and accepting the notion that the indifferent treatment of women will never be
resolved. Through another sexist comment, Mrs. Hale expresses her disbelief and exhaustion
which is once again smothered by Mrs. Peters when she says, “[apologetically] Of course
they’ve got awful important things on their minds” (Glaspell). As we know, the superego
originates from the acts and roles of the same-sex parent, however, this [Superego] is then
powered and heightened “as the product of repeated conditioning by criticism” (Storr). Mrs.
Peters can be interpreted as a prime example of this concept. Throughout the play, she is seen as
apologetic and understanding, playing between the lines of what is considered right by her
standards, or how the audience’s society interprets it, and what is right by the readers. The
readers understand that these comments are troublesome and should not be accepted, yet Mrs.
Peters's instantaneous acceptance of these remarks are deeply concerning. By setting this up, the
readers can interpret that within the confines of the play’s society, sexist remarks and gender
roles have been deeply ingrained in the lives of the characters that it stems before the lifetime of
6
entrapment.
Through these characters, Glaspell’s play creates a society that informs the audience of
the enforced gender roles that have been deeply ingrained to allow the readers to juxtapose the
play’s society with our own. Although Freud’s theories of psychoanalysis are outdated, the
disparity between men and women is still apparent in contemporary society. It is important to
comprehend the timeline of gender roles to create a level of sympathy with the hopes of mending
Works Cited
Berk, Laura E., and Adena Beth Meyers. Infants, Children, and Adolescents. Pearson, 2016.
Brown, Elke. “Gender in Trifles.” Encyclopedia of Themes in Literature, Facts On File, 2020.
Bloom's Literature,
online.infobase.com/Auth/Index?aid=257473&itemid=WE54&articleId=38805.
Brown, Elke. “Justice in Trifles.” Encyclopedia of Themes in Literature, Facts On File, 2020.
Bloom's Literature,
online.infobase.com/Auth/Index?aid=257473&itemid=WE54&articleId=38807.
link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX3435300407/GVRL?u=oran78789&sid=bookmark-GVRL&xi
d=39347230.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgDA27xjbfU.
Storr, Anthony, 'Ego, super-ego, and id', Freud: A Very Short Introduction, Very Short