Prelimimaries (2023)

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 13

Republic of the Philippines

UNIVERSITY OF ANTIQUE - HAMTIC CAMPUS


College of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Science
Guintas, Hamtic, Antique

PERFORMANCE OF NATIVE CHICKEN (Gallus gallus domesticus) FED WITH


DIFFERENT LEVELS OF FERMENTED RICE BRAN IN THE RATION

An Undergraduate Thesis

Presented to the Faculty of the

College of Agriculture, Forestry and Food science

University of Antique- Hamtic Campus

Guintas, Hamtic, Antique

In Partial Fulfillment

of the Requirements for the Degree

Bachelor of Science in Agriculture

(Animal Science)

By

Irish Claire M. Asoy

Kimberly D. Idaosos

Eden May E. Pollicar

January 2023

i
Republic of the Philippines
UNIVERSITY OF ANTIQUE - HAMTIC CAMPUS
College of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Science
Guintas, Hamtic, Antique

PERFORMANCE OF NATIVE CHICKENS (Gallus gallus domesticus)


FED WITH DIFFERENT LEVELS OF FERMENTED RICE BRAN IN RATION

Irish Claire M. Asoy, Kimberly D. Idaosos and Eden May E. Pollicar


University of Antique- Hamtic Campus
Bachelor of Science in Agriculture
Major: Animal Science

Recommending Approval:

LUZ AZALEA O. GADAYAN, MAgr


Adviser

Approved by the Research Committee:

CHONA P. NAPALINGA, MAgr


Member

ARVIN D. SUBILLAGA, MAgr


Member

CRYSTA F. GAUDIEL, MSAgry


Research Coordinator

KREMLIN MARK B. AMPODE, PhD


Dean, CAFFS

_____________________
Date

ii
Republic of the Philippines
UNIVERSITY OF ANTIQUE - HAMTIC CAMPUS
College of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Science
Guintas, Hamtic, Antique

Acknowledgement

The researchers hereby acknowledge and extend their profound gratitude

and appreciation to all whose valuable support, guidance, love, concern and

financial assistance contributed to the completion of this study.

First and foremost to the Almighty God, for the strength and guidance. In

Proverbs 3:5-6 say that trust in the lord with all your heart and lean on your own

understanding; in all your ways submit to him, and he will make your paths

straight. Nice and expensive item can be enjoyable but there are very few thing

in life that can never take away and will never go out of style and truly make you

a better person. And education is one of those. He provide the researchers the

strength in facing the trials and difficulties that came and their way during the

conduct of this study.

Ms. Luz Azalea O. Gadayan, thesis adviser for sharing her knowledge and

skills; providing noteworthy inputs in the manuscript; constant reminder,

inspiration, guidance, parental affection, and encouragement from the start of the

conduct of this research until it concluded on time;

Ms. Edelen Aleja E. Pollicar, for sharing her expertise, ideas, knowledge

and untiring effort and assistance in interpreting the research data to finish this

study.

Their classmate, roommates, friends and love ones for their moral support

and helping hands in the preparation for the area;

iii
Republic of the Philippines
UNIVERSITY OF ANTIQUE - HAMTIC CAMPUS
College of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Science
Guintas, Hamtic, Antique

Special thanks and gratitude are also extended to Nong Naldo for unending

support and allowing us to conduct the study without hesitation;

Also they bear in their minds and heart that unconditional love, care,

prayers and unending financial support of their beloved parents; Mr. and Mrs.

Donato H. Asoy, Mr. and Mrs. Rene M. Labanao and Mr. and Mrs. Edgar B.

Pollicar.

Mrs. Rosanmi C. Labnao for sharing her expertise and knowledge for

checking our thesis.

Mr. Harry C. Luces for the methodical and statistical ideas, untiring effort

and assistance in interpreting the research data.

Mr. Kremlin Mark D. Ampode Dean College of Agriculture , Forestry and

Food Science, for the approval of the study;

Ms. Crysta F. Gaudiel, Research Coordinator for her valuable pieces of

advice and knowledge for the improvement of the study.

Mrs. Eugenia E. Suaga, University Librarian together with Ms. Gretchen

Joy P. Siasat and Ms. Gemma M. Torechilla for their kindness and patience

extended when the researchers were doing library work.

Mrs. Chona P. Napalinga and Mr. Arvin D. Subillaga member of oral

defense committee for their worthy suggestions, patience in understanding the

researcher short coming and pieces of advice;

iv
Republic of the Philippines
UNIVERSITY OF ANTIQUE - HAMTIC CAMPUS
College of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Science
Guintas, Hamtic, Antique

To all unmentioned, who hands had pushed forth and enlightened the

researchers heart by their knowledge and experience while travelling on the path

of light and education, the researcher will forever be thankful to them all.

Above all, to the Lord Almighty, who is the source of everything, for

strength encourage He has given to surpass all difficulties encountered by the

researchers to accomplish their study. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

I. C. M. Asoy

K. D. Idaosos

E. M. E. Pollicar

January 2023

v
Republic of the Philippines
UNIVERSITY OF ANTIQUE - HAMTIC CAMPUS
College of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Science
Guintas, Hamtic, Antique

Irish Claire M. Asoy, Kimberly D. Idaosos and Eden May E. Pollicar,


January 2023. Performance of Native Chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus)
fed with different levels of fermented rice bran in ration. An undergraduate
Thesis, Bachelor of Science in Agriculture. University of Antique- Hamtic
Campus, Guintas Hamtic, Antique.

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine the performance of Native Chickens (Gallus

gallus domesticus) fed with different levels of fermented rice bran in ration at

Barangay Guintas, Hamtic, Antique. The experiment started from October 2022

to November 2022 to assess the performance of native chickens, and it utilized

four treatments using four different rations such as: (a) Conventional Ration

(Control) (b) 25% Fermented Rice Bran (FRB)+ Formulated Ration (FR), (c) 50%

Fermented Rice Bran (FRB)+ Formulated Ration (FR), (d) 75% Fermented Rice

Bran (FRB) + Formulated Ration (FR). There were five birds per treatment and

was replicated three times. A study was conducted to determine the performance

of Native Chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) fed with different levels of

fermented rice bran in ration at Barangay Guintas, Hamtic, Antique. The result of

the study revealed that at first (1st) to fifth (5th) weeks of observation there were

significant differences among the response of different levels of fermented rice

bran on native chickens on average weekly feed consumption at third (3 rd) and

six (6th) after feeding of FRB. In addition, significance difference was also

recorded in live weight five (5th) weeks after treatment with F2 and F3 as highest

live weight observed. Feed conversion result revealed significance difference

vi
Republic of the Philippines
UNIVERSITY OF ANTIQUE - HAMTIC CAMPUS
College of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Science
Guintas, Hamtic, Antique

between all FRB formulation compared to conventional two (2) weeks after

treatment. Moreover, no significant difference was recorded in terms of feed

conversion ratio.

Table of Contents

Page

Title Page i

Approval Sheet ii

Acknowledgement iii

Abstract vi

Table of Contents viii

List of Table xi

List of Appendices xiii

Chapter

I INTRODUCTION

Background of the Study 1

Objectives of the Study 2

Scope and Limitations of the Study 3

Significance of the Study 3

Definition of terms 4

II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE 6

Native Chicken 6

vii
Republic of the Philippines
UNIVERSITY OF ANTIQUE - HAMTIC CAMPUS
College of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Science
Guintas, Hamtic, Antique

Philippine Native Chicken 8

Native Chicken in the Western Visayas 9

Performance of Birds 11

Formulation of Supplemental feeds 11

Formulating Feed 13

Rice Bran 13

Fermentation Process 15

Benefits of Fermented 16

Maize 17

Fish Meal 17

III METHODOLOGY 20

Materials 20

Methods 20

Experimental Design and Formulations 20

Experimental Layout 21

Preparation of experimental pen 22

Preparation of feed ingredients 22

Preparation of Fermented Rice Bran 22

Preparation of Feeds 22

Selection of Stocks 23

IV PRESENTATION, ANALYSES AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA 26

viii
Republic of the Philippines
UNIVERSITY OF ANTIQUE - HAMTIC CAMPUS
College of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Science
Guintas, Hamtic, Antique

V. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 50

Summary 50

Conclusions 51

Recommendations 52

REFERENCES 53

APPENDICES 60

ix
Republic of the Philippines
UNIVERSITY OF ANTIQUE - HAMTIC CAMPUS
College of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Science
Guintas, Hamtic, Antique

List of Tables

Table Page

1 Experimental Growing Ration 20

2 Average weekly live weight gain (g) of native chicken 24


supplemented with different formulated ration after 1 st week
of treatment

3 Average weekly live weight gain (g) of native chicken 25


supplemented with different formulated
ration after 2nd week of treatment.

4 Average weekly live weight gain (g) of native chicken 27


supplemented with different formulated
ration after 3rd week of treatment.

6 Average weekly live weight gain (g) of native 28


chicken supplemented with different formulated
ration after 4th week of treatment.

7 Average weekly live weight gain (g) of native 29


chicken supplemented with different formulated
ration after 5th week of treatment.

8 Average weekly live weight gain (g) of native 30


chicken supplemented with different formulated
ration after 6th week of treatment.

9 Average weekly feed consumption (g) of 31


native chicken supplemented with different
formulated ration after 1st week of treatment.

10 Average weekly feed consumption (g) of 32


native chicken supplemented with different
formulated ration after 2nd week of treatment.

x
Republic of the Philippines
UNIVERSITY OF ANTIQUE - HAMTIC CAMPUS
College of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Science
Guintas, Hamtic, Antique

11 Average weekly feed consumption (g) of 34


native chicken supplemented with different
formulated ration after 3rd week of treatment.

12 Average weekly feed consumption (g) of 35


native chicken supplemented with different
formulated ration after 4th week of treatment.

13 Average weekly feed consumption (g) of 36


native chicken supplemented with different
formulated ration after 5th week of treatment.

14 Average weekly feed consumption (g) of 38


native chicken supplemented with different
formulated ration after 6th week of treatment.

15 Average weekly feed conversion ratio (g) of native 39


chicken supplemented with different formulated
ration after 1st week of treatment.

16 Average weekly feed conversion ratio (g) of native 40


chicken supplemented with different formulated
ration after 2nd week of treatment.

17 Average weekly feed conversion ratio (g) of native 42


chicken supplemented with different formulated
ration after 3rd week of treatment.

18 Average weekly feed conversion ratio (g) of native 43


chicken supplemented with different formulated
ration after 4th week of treatment.

19 Average weekly feed conversion ratio (g) of native 44


chicken supplemented with different formulated
ration after 5th week of treatment.

20 Average weekly feed conversion ratio (g) of native 46


chicken supplemented with different formulated
ration after 6th week of treatment.

xi
Republic of the Philippines
UNIVERSITY OF ANTIQUE - HAMTIC CAMPUS
College of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Science
Guintas, Hamtic, Antique

List of Appendices

Table Page

1 Analysis of Variance on the Average Weekly weight gain in 55


gram (g) of native chicken supplemented with different
formulated rations at 1st week of observation with different
formulated rations at 1st week of observation

2 Analysis of Variance on the Average Weekly weight gain in 56


gram (g) of native chicken supplemented with different
formulated rations at 2nd week of observation

3 Analysis of Variance on the Average Weekly weight gain in 57


gram (g) of native chicken supplemented with different
formulated rations at 3rd week of observation

4 Analysis of Variance on the Average Weekly weight gain in 58


gram (g) of native chicken supplemented with different
formulated rations at 4th week of observation

5 Analysis of Variance on the Average Weekly weight gain in 59


gram (g) of native chicken supplemented with different
formulated rations at 5th week of observation

6 Analysis of Variance on the Average Weekly weight gain in 60


gram (g) of native chicken supplemented with different
formulated rations at 6th week of observation

7 Analysis of Variance on the Average Weekly feed 61


consumption in gram (g) of native chicken supplemented with
different formulated rations at 1st week of observation

8 Analysis of Variance on the Average Weekly feed 62


consumption in gram (g) of native chicken supplemented with

xii
Republic of the Philippines
UNIVERSITY OF ANTIQUE - HAMTIC CAMPUS
College of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Science
Guintas, Hamtic, Antique

different formulated rations at 2nd week of observation

9 Analysis of Variance on the Average Weekly feed 63


consumption in gram (g) of native chicken supplemented with
different formulated rations at 3rd week of observation

10 Analysis of Variance on the Average Weekly feed 64


consumption in gram (g) of native chicken supplemented with
different formulated rations at 4th week of observation
11 Analysis of Variance on the Average Weekly feed 65
consumption in gram (g) of native chicken supplemented with
different formulated rations at 5th week of observation

12 Analysis of Variance on the Average Weekly feed 66


consumption in gram (g) of native chicken supplemented with
different formulated rations at 6th week of observation.

13 Weekly feed conversion ratio (FCR) in gram (g) of native 67


chicken supplemented with different formulated rations at 1 st
week of observation

14 Analysis of Variance on the Average Weekly feed conversion 68


ratio (FCR) in gram (g) of native chicken supplemented with
different formulated rations at 2nd week of observation

15 Analysis of Variance on the Average Weekly feed conversion 69


ratio (FCR) in gram (g) of native chicken supplemented with
different formulated rations at 3rd week of observation.

16 Analysis of Variance on the Average Weekly feed conversion 70


ratio (FCR) in gram (g) of native chicken supplemented with
different formulated rations at 4th week of observation.

17 Analysis of Variance on the Average Weekly feed conversion 71


ratio (FCR) in gram (g) of native chicken supplemented with
different formulated rations at 5th week of observation.

18 Analysis of Variance on the Average Weekly feed conversion 72


ratio (FCR) in gram (g) of native chicken supplemented with
different formulated rations at 6th week of observation.

xiii

You might also like