Scribd
Upload
739 views20 pages

Com4806 02 Mark052100

1. The document contains feedback and comments from Dr. Braam van der Vyver on an assignment submitted by Jason BLAND. 2. Dr. van der Vyver provides 22 comments on various aspects of the assignment such as the introduction, structure, references, level of detail in the answers, and formatting. 3. Many of the comments indicate that the level of detail, substance, and analysis in Jason BLAND's answers could be improved. Dr. van der Vyver also notes issues with formatting and referencing.

Uploaded by

Jason Bland
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
739 views20 pages

Com4806 02 Mark052100

1. The document contains feedback and comments from Dr. Braam van der Vyver on an assignment submitted by Jason BLAND. 2. Dr. van der Vyver provides 22 comments on various aspects of the assignment such as the introduction, structure, references, level of detail in the answers, and formatting. 3. Many of the comments indicate that the level of detail, substance, and analysis in Jason BLAND's answers could be improved. Dr. van der Vyver also notes issues with formatting and referencing.

Uploaded by

Jason Bland
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 20

1

Marked by Dr. Braam van der Vyver


15 September 2021

Assignment 2 Final
by Jason BLAND

Submission date: 23-Aug-2021 11:32AM (UTC+0200)


Submission ID: 1634744406
File name: 46272267_Assignment_2_752408.pdf (475.83K)
Word count: 3295
Character count: 18210
1
1
2
3

21 6

7
8

13
10
13

11
12

12
13

11

17
6

14

19

22

15
11

12
16

17
18

19

20
1

20 2

5
21

1
8

14

18

15

10

1
1

16

1
1

22 4
Assignment 2 Final
ORIGINALITY REPORT

32 %
SIMILARITY INDEX
26%
INTERNET SOURCES
11%
PUBLICATIONS
28%
STUDENT PAPERS

PRIMARY SOURCES

1
Submitted to University of South Africa
Student Paper 17%
2
sk.sagepub.com
Internet Source 2%
3
www.emerald.com
Internet Source 2%
4
uir.unisa.ac.za
Internet Source 1%
5
Submitted to Liverpool John Moores
University
1%
Student Paper

6
repository.wit.ie
Internet Source 1%
7
Submitted to University of Cape Town
Student Paper 1%
8
Submitted to University of East London
Student Paper 1%
9
orca.cardiff.ac.uk
Internet Source 1%
10
sajp.co.za
Internet Source 1%
11
www.iol.co.za
Internet Source 1%
12
www.sagepub.com
Internet Source 1%
13
John Abdul Kargbo. "Managing indigenous
knowledge: What role for public librarians in
1%
Sierra Leone?", International Information &
Library Review, 2013
Publication

14
Submitted to Victoria University
Student Paper 1%
15
Submitted to University of Stellenbosch,
South Africa
1%
Student Paper

16
www.mandalaconsulting.co.za
Internet Source 1%
17
Submitted to University of College Cork
Student Paper <1 %
18
Submitted to University of Derby
Student Paper <1 %
19
tch2lrnak.weebly.com
Internet Source <1 %
eprints.lancs.ac.uk
<1 %
Internet Source
20

21
www.safrica24.com
Internet Source <1 %
22
researchspace.ukzn.ac.za
Internet Source <1 %

Exclude quotes Off Exclude matches Off


Exclude bibliography Off
RESULTS
Question 1.1 = 7

Question 1.2 = 12

Question 1.4 = 5

Question 1.5 = 12

Question 2.1 = 5

Question 2.2 = 5

Technical presentation = 6

------------------------------

Total = 52 / 100 (52%)


COMMENTS
1 Marked by Dr. Braam van der Vyver 15 September 2021
2 CAPITAL LETTERS
3 program = UK spelling is prescribed.
4 assignment
5 You need to do better in structuring your introduction. Although you do mention some aspects that are
important and good to find in an introduction, you need to understand that an introduction is meant to
introduce the assignment (as the name implies). In this you have to “tell” the reader what they are to
expect from your assignment – what you will be focusing on.
6 The question only deals with the Sanlam case study.
7 the
8 plriversal
9 A good answer. See the General Feedback document that will be shared on myUnisa once the
marking has been completed.
10 Source? The colour coding confirms that this is coming from a published source. The text needs to be
referenced.
11 Source? The colour coding confirms that this is coming from a published source. The text needs to be
referenced.
12 Your answer lacks subsance and detail. You had to describe how you would gather and analyse the
data. See the General Feedback document that will be shared on myUnisa once the marking has been
completed.
13 The topic that you selected has got a strong transformative ring to it but I accept your explanation.

14 You had to provide a stronger link between Sanlam and the topic. You only explained the the theory.
15 Your answer lacks substance dan detail. You had 500 words to explain how you would gather and
analyse the data. Use it.
16 You had to place more emphasis on the quantification of outcomes.
17 e
18 More emphasis should have been placed on anecdotal evidence and qualitative outcomes.
19 CAPITAL LETTERS
20 &
21 &
22 Your list had to be in alphabetical order.

You might also like