2016 - Emerald - Younis, Sundarakani, Vel - CR-04-2015-0024

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/306147905
The impact of implementing green supply chain management practices on

corporate performance
Article in Competitiveness Review An International Business Journal incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness · May 2016
DOI: 10.1108/CR-04-2015-0024
CITATIONS READS
87 4,809
3 authors:
Hassan Younis Balan Sundarakani

German Jordanian University University of Wollongong in Dubai
5 PUBLICATIONS 111 CITATIONS 91 PUBLICATIONS 827 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE
Prakash Vel
University of Wollongong in Dubai
24 PUBLICATIONS 300 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Organizational learning within supply-chain networks View project
Industry 4.0 Project View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Balan Sundarakani on 21 October 2018.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Competitiveness Review
The impact of implementing green supply chain management practices on
corporate performance
Hassan Younis Balan Sundarakani Prakash Vel
Article information:
To cite this document:
Hassan Younis Balan Sundarakani Prakash Vel , (2016),"The impact of implementing green supply
chain management practices on corporate performance", Competitiveness Review, Vol. 26 Iss 3 pp.
216 - 245
Permanent link to this document:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/CR-04-2015-0024
Downloaded by University of Wollongong At 03:10 09 July 2016 (PT)
Downloaded on: 09 July 2016, At: 03:10 (PT)

References: this document contains references to 124 other documents.
To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight.com
The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 240 times since 2016*
Users who downloaded this article also downloaded:
(2012),"Green supply chain management practices: impact on performance", Supply
Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 17 Iss 3 pp. 290-305 http://
dx.doi.org/10.1108/13598541211227126
(2016),"Sustainable green supply chain management: trends and current practices", Competitiveness
Review, Vol. 26 Iss 3 pp. 265-288
(2016),"Analyzing the factors for implementation of green supply chain management",
Competitiveness Review, Vol. 26 Iss 3 pp. 246-264
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-
srm:235887 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald
for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission
guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company
manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as
well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and
services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for
digital archive preservation.
*Related content and download information correct at time of download.
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
www.emeraldinsight.com/1059-5422.htm
CR
26,3
The impact of implementing
green supply chain management
practices on corporate
216 performance
Received 19 April 2015
Revised 14 September 2015
Hassan Younis, Balan Sundarakani and Prakash Vel
Accepted 7 October 2015 University of Wollongong in Dubai, Dubai, UAE
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this research is to investigate the implementation of green supply chain
management (GSCM) practices and its impact on corporate performance (CP). The research in
particular examines the results of implementing a set of GSCM practices on different dimensions of
the CP.
Design/methodology/approach – This study, being the first of its kind in the Middle East,
developed a research model to test the relationship between four main GSCM practices namely,
eco-design, green purchasing, environmental cooperation and reverse logistics, and four
dimensions of CP: operational performance, environmental performance, economic performance
and social performance, while controlling three main variables (firm size, firm age and environment
management system certification). Statistical analyses were based on the data collected, through
survey questionnaires, from 117 firms in the manufacturing industry in the UAE. Reliability and
validity of the research model were tested by the commonly accepted statistical tools. To test the
hypotheses relating implementation of GSCM practice and CP, multiple regression analysis was
used.
Findings – The finding of the study was that GSCM practices impact the CP dimensions
differently. While none of the four GSCM practices were found to have any impact on the
environmental performance, green purchasing and environmental cooperation were found to have
a significant impact on the operational performance. The study found that only green purchasing
plays a role in improving the economic performance, while only reverse logistics practices were
found to impact the social performance of the firm positively.
Research limitations/implications – Research on GSCM is still in the nascent stage. Further
refinement of the survey to differentiate between different manufacturing industries might be needed.
Generalizability of the findings is also limited because of data collected from manufacturing firms in the
UAE. This research provides important insights. The findings of this research are generally consistent
with those of prior studies in other parts of the world. Firms in manufacturing industry in the UAE
believe that GSCM practices help the company design and develop better products which, in turn,
increase the company chances in selling its products in the international markets while, at same time,
improving the average profit and market share. It was also found that the UAE firms believe that
implementation of GSCM practices help improve the corporate image, enhance employees’ job
satisfaction and improve employees’ health and safety.
Practical implications – Implementation of GSCM practices improves CP in different ways. Supply
Competitiveness Review chain managers are required to decide on the CP dimension they want to improve and accordingly select
Vol. 26 No. 3, 2016
pp. 216-245
the appropriate GSCM practices mix that leads to the desired level of improvement.
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
1059-5422
Originality/value – Although few earlier researches studied the impact of GSCM on CP, this study is
DOI 10.1108/CR-04-2015-0024 different and makes a unique contribution by offering a holistic view of the impact of implementing four
main GSCM practices on all dimensions of CP. The study offers some insights on the type of GSCM Green supply
practices the firm needs to adopt to improve the targeted performance dimension.
chain
Keywords Manufacturing industry, Corporate performance, Green supply chain management,
Quantitative research
management
Paper type Research paper
217
1. Introduction
The integration of environmental concerns and organizational performance started
gaining attention over the recent decades. Climate change, the depletion of natural
resources and environmental pollution are the main drivers behind the international
efforts to greening the supply chains. Greening the supply chain has become an
organizational mandate in some developed countries. However, when it comes to Middle
Eastern countries, majority of them are still late adopters. The term green or carbon
emission or carbon credits is not yet ubiquitous in organizational operations.
Although some early researchers focused on carbon emission models and pollution
studies, “green” as a definition was not institutionalized until the past decade. Hervani
et al. (2005) was probably the first academician who coined a clear definition for green
supply chain stating; “Green supply chain is a concept that combines green
procurement, environmental management of manufacturing materials, environmental
circulation, marketing, and reverse logistics”. However, Sarkis’ (1998) definition was
rather narrower in focus coining “a combination of the activities of an environmental
company and reverse logistics, and emphasized the latter’s importance”. Later in 2010,
Sundarakani et al. (2010) defined:
[…] green supply chain management can be defined as the integration of environmental
thinking into supply chain management, including product design, supplier selection and
material sourcing, manufacturing processes, product packaging, delivery of the product to the
consumers, and end-of-life management of the product after its use.
However, in between, definitions were forwarded on other aspects like Beamon (1999)
defined a green supply chain as:
[…] the extension of the traditional supply chain to include activities that aim at minimizing
environmental impacts of a product throughout its entire cycle, such as green design, resource
saving, harmful material reduction and product recycle and reuse.
Going beyond Beamon’s definition above, Kumar and Putnam (2008) claimed that the
end-to-end supply chain process, which was called “cradle to grave” in the early eighties,
is now called “cradle to cradle”, which means that the product has to be returned back to
the origin (the manufacturer) to be reproduced or properly disposed; therefore,
extending the supply chain to include green activities is not sufficient anymore as
claimed by Beamon earlier. Srivastava (2007), on the other hand, believes that green
supply chain management (GSCM) practices need to be integrated across the whole
supply chain including acquisition of raw material, product design, manufacturing
processes, finished product delivery and finally the management of the disposal of the
product after its useful life.
Recently, Agrawal et al. (2015) intended to present a comprehensive review of the
published literature on reverse logistics issues being one of the most important GSCM
practices, the authors found that there is no single study available on the drivers and
CR barriers of reverse logistics adoption and implementation across sectors and
26,3 demographics. To provide a forecasting method that is able to predict the rate of product
returns and expected time of product returns claiming they are stochastic, random and
uncertain, Agrawal et al. (2014) proposed a model for forecasting product returns using
graphical evaluation and review technique which was validated by a case study within
the electronics industry in India.
218 Motivating businesses to adopt GSCM practices starts by exploring the
improvements these practices can bring about, not only on the economic side but also on
other dimensions including the operational, social and environmental image of the
organization. Hence, a holistic study is called for. Thus, this paper attempts to explore
the impact of implementing a set of common green supply chain practices on different
dimensions of corporate performance (CP).
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 reviews the existing
literature in the field of green supply chain and CP. The research framework and
hypotheses development are discussed in Section 3. Section 4 discusses the research
methodology including the statistical analysis and hypotheses testing. Discussion of the
analysis and findings are presented in Section 5, while the conclusion is presented in
Section 6. The managerial implications are presented in Section 7, while the avenues for
further researches and the research limitations are presented at Sections 8 and 9,
respectively.
2. Literature review
The literature on GSCM and CP started to appear in the journals and social science
books since early 1990s when a Harvard Business Scholar, Michael Porter, sparked a
debate by claiming that corporate environmental improvements lead to financial
improvements in the long term, and he also introduced the concept of “Innovation
offsets” and that GSCM can be a vehicle for creating competitive advantages for a firm
(Porter, 1991).
A recent study on the sustainable supply chain by Carter and Easton (2011), which
intended to provide a systematic review of the evolution of supply chain management
over a period of 20 years, found that environment aspects of supply chain have been the
focus of researchers and academicians. The authors reviewed 80 articles and contrasted
them in terms of: subject, inferential, moderation, methodology, analysis used, context
and theory used. The authors found that a large focus on consumer product industry
with 55 per cent of the articles heavily relied on descriptive statistics and 10 per cent
included moderating variables, whereas less than 4 per cent used conceptual theory
building and hence a clear lacuna in this area could be spotted.
The inconsistency in the existing literature stems from the mixed results reported on
GSCM practices and its impact on CP outcomes. More specifically, while some studies
found no relationship, other studies revealed either a positive or a negative relationship.
2.1 Green supply chain management and corporate performance: no relationship

An evidence of no relationship can be found in the recent work of Lee et al. (2012). The
study aimed at exploring the direct and indirect paths of related factors between the
implementation of GSCM practices and the firm’s performance. Using responses from a
survey questionnaire to 223 small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the
electronic industry in Korea, the authors found that no direct relationship, but an
indirect relationship exists between GSCM practices and organizational performance Green supply
mediated by operational and relational efficiency. The strength of the study is supported chain
by a good sample size (i.e. 223) and a 100 per cent response rate, but the measurement of
the dependent variable, namely, “business performance”, might be inconclusive as it
management
ignored the operational element, in particular, the impact of the independent variables
(GSCM practices) on the effectiveness and efficiency of the products and processes
within the organization. 219
Similarly, the work of Benito and Benito (2005), reported same results. They intended
to empirically analyze the relationship between environmental proactivity and business
performance using quantitative data gathered through a survey questionnaire of 186
industrial companies in Spain. Using multiple regression analysis, the authors found no
evidence on any relationship between environmental proactivity and financial
performance. Using the same dependent variable used by Benito and Benito (2005),
Watson et al. (2004), compared ten pairs of firms (environmental management system
[EMS] adopters and non-EMS adopters) in different industries with an objective to
propose and test a framework that quantifies EMS improvements to determine their
impact on financial performance. The authors found no significant difference in the
financial performance between EMS adopters and non-adopters.
2.2 Green supply chain management and corporate performance: negative relationship
The second wave of literature documented negative relationships between
implementation of GSCM practices and the different dimensions of CP. Examples of
negative relationships include the work of Richey et al. (2005). The study used a survey
questionnaire to collect data from 118 respondents to examine the effect of reverse
logistics programs on reverse logistics performance in the automobile aftermarket
industry in the USA. The findings revealed that internal innovation impacts
performance negatively as it seems too costly. Another example of a negative
relationship was reported by Montabon et al. (2007). The authors used content analysis
of 45 corporate reports to empirically examine the relationship between a set of different
environment management practices (EMPs) and firm performance. The study found a
negative relationship between EMPs and the return on investment. The strengths of the
study include: meeting most statistical assumptions for the canonical correlation
analysis used and clearly justifying the use of content analysis to tackle the subject
matter. Furthermore, Large and Thomsen (2011) reported a negative relationship
between green cooperation with suppliers and purchasing performance. The authors
obtained quantitative data from 109 purchasing and supply managers in Germany
using survey questionnaire. The objective was to study the impact of different
approaches (green assessment and green collaboration) on environmental performance
improvement and to investigate the impact of environmental performance
improvements on the outcomes of purchasing department.
2.3 Green supply chain management and corporate performance: positive relationship
Supporters of Porter’s earlier claim on GSCM–CP positive relationship are many, and
their research provides evidence from numerous industries to show that different GSCM
practices lead to a variety of positive relationships on performance outcomes. The
following section highlights the main studies.
CR A very recent study conducted by Diabat et al. (2013) to explore the relationship
26,3 between green supply chain practice initiatives and performance outcomes using
survey questionnaire to 50 participants from industry and academia, found that three
main GSCM practices, namely, eco-design, co-operation with customers and reverse
logistics, can impact the economic performance positively and can lead to better CP.
Similarly, Green et al. (2012) used a larger sample size of 159 managers in the
220 manufacturing industries in the USA to examine and assess the impact of implementing
GSCM practices on the environmental, operational and organizational performance.
Using structural equation modeling, the authors found positive relationships between
different GSCM practices (including: internal environmental management, green
purchasing, green information systems, cooperation with customers, investment
recovery and eco-design and different dimensions of CP). Although a very low response
rate of 8 per cent was reported, the study was the first to introduce staged GSCM
implementation.
Adopting a similar research methodology used by Green et al. (2012); Zhu and Sarkis
(2004) surveyed 186 manufacturing firms in China to examine the relationship between
GSCM practice and environmental and economic performance. The authors found that
enterprises with higher levels of GSCM adoption are having better environmental and
positive economic performance.
In a same context, Liang and Chang (2008) surveyed 127 enterprises in China to
investigate the potential influences of GSCM on the performances of SMEs. Using
structural equation modeling, the authors found that performance of SMEs is positively
associated with implementation of GSCM practices. Analogous results were also
reported by Zailani et al. (2012) who used a solid theoretical background that relied on
strategic choice theory and institutional theory to develop their argument. The
researchers adopted a survey tool to gather data from 132 ISO 14001 certified
organizations in Malaysia and used structural equation modeling to examine the extent
to which internal proactive environmental strategy and external institutional drivers
motivate firms to adopt eco-designs that influence environmental performance. The
findings squared with those of Zhu and Sarkis (2004) and Liang and Chang (2008).
Furthermore they found that regulations and incentives positively impact
environmental performance.
On the positive relationship between GSCM practices and environmental
performance, a study by Kung et al. (2012) reported similar findings. The authors
analyzed responses of a survey questionnaire to 118 respondents in the manufacturing
industry in Taiwan to investigate the relationship between green management and
environmental performance. Using hierarchical regression analysis, positive
relationships were found between green manufacturing, green packaging, the adoption
of ISO 14001 and the attainment of environmental labels from one side and
environmental performance from the other side. Additionally, the work of Cordano et al.
(2010) on the green practices in the winery industry in the USA reported similar results.
Using a survey questionnaire to 369 managers within the industry, the authors intended
to examine whether the development of rudimentary EMS, increases the success of
implementing solid waste recycling and energy conservation practices. The multiple
regression analysis used confirmed that firms with more developed EMP achieve
greater success in implementing energy conservation and recycling activities and
consequently better environmental performance.
In a similar manner, Gonzalez et al. (2008) analyzed the existence of differences in the Green supply
implementation of environmental practices between companies that possess some form chain
of certified EMS (ISO 14001 or EMS) and those that do not have any such system in
Spain. The researcher used a survey questionnaire during one to one interviews with
management
157 executives in the automotive industry. Using logistic regression to test the
relationship, the author found that there is a significant relationship between the
possession of certified EMS, organization size and demand on suppliers to implement 221
environmental practices (i.e. environmental performance) which in turn indicate that
implementation of GSCM represented by having EMS certification such as ISO 14001,
directs the corporate environmental behavior toward the surrounding stakeholders
including its suppliers. Although the study was limited to one industry within one
country, it can be considered as one of the genuine works in the field as all statistical
assumptions were met and the authors used valid and reliable measures to measure both
variables, in particular, EMS as the independent variable and corporate practices as the
dependent variable.
Based on the above, the scattered nature of observations and findings from studies on
GCSM practices and their impact on CP could be evidenced. However, the dearth of a
holistic conceptual model acts as a deterrent in giving potential researchers a proven
research benchmark.
2.4 Review of independent variables selected for the proposed theoretical model
Green supply chain practices are those initiatives that any organization adopts to
comply with environmental legislations, reduce its operations’ negative impact on the
environment and improve its performance. This research will focus on those green
supply chain initiatives that have been widely adopted and discussed in the existing
literature which include: green purchasing, eco-design, environmental cooperation and
reverse logistics. The above four practices will become the independent variables for the
theoretical model to be investigated.
2.4.1 Green purchasing. Green purchasing can be defined as an environmental
purchasing initiative that aims to ensure that purchased products and material meet
with environmental objectives set by the purchasing firm such as reducing sources of
waste, encouraging recycling, reuse and substitution of materials (Carter and Ellram,
1998; Min and Galle, 2001; Zsidisin and Siferd, 2001).
2.4.2 Eco-design. This research adopts the definition developed by Johansson (2002)
for eco-design, which defines eco-design as the actions taken during product
development stage targeted toward minimizing a product’s environmental impact
during its whole life cycle starting from acquiring raw material to manufacturing, use
and finally to its final disposal without compromising other essential product criteria
such as performance and cost.
2.4.3 Environmental cooperation. Adopting green supply chain practices requires
internal and external cooperation among the different stakeholders, for example, in the
manufacturing industry, cooperation to achieve environmental objectives needs to exist
between the organizations’ different departments such as purchasing, marketing,
production and human resources.
Environmental cooperation has been used as a GSCM initiative by several studies
but in one of two forms, either in the upstream with the suppliers or in the downstream
with the customers. In this research, cooperation with suppliers or customers will be
CR referred to as environmental cooperation. Examples on existing studies that used
26,3 environmental cooperation include the work of Lee et al. (2012), who examined its impact
on different performance dimensions within electronic firms in Korea. In the same way,
Perotti et al. (2012) used environmental cooperation along with other GSCM initiatives to
examine how the adoption of GSC practices by third-party logistics (3PLs) in Italy can
affect the company performance. Using collaboration with suppliers and collaboration
222 with customers in addition to other GSCM initiatives, Diabat et al. (2013) aimed to
examine their impact on different CP measures.
2.4.4 Reverse logistics. This research adopts the definition proposed by Carter and
Ellram (1998) that defines reverse logistics as:
[…] the return or take back of products and materials from the point of consumption to the
forward supply chain for the purpose of recycling, reuse, remanufacture, repair, refurbishing
or safe disposal of the products and materials.
Like other green supply chain initiatives, reverse logistics plays a key role in enhancing
the organization’s operational efficiency, improves its competitiveness and reduces
system-wide costs.
Reverse logistics is one of the most commonly used GSCM practices in the existing
literature. For example, Perotti et al. (2012) included reverse logistics along with other
GSCM initiatives in their study of some logistics providers in Italy to assess the adoption
level of such initiatives and their potential impact on different CP dimensions. Likewise,
Diabat et al. (2013) used Fuzzy TOPSIS method to explore how reverse logistics along
with other GSCM initiatives can lead to improved CP. In the same way, reverse logistics
was among three GSCM practices that Eltayeb and Zailani (2009) intended to rank in
terms of the adoption levels in Malaysia.
2.5 Review of the dependent variables selected for the theoretical model
CP is the other side of the GSCM–Performance equation and was always considered as
the dependent variable in most of the studies examined its relationship with GSCM.
GSCM initiatives might lead to tangible benefits such as cost reduction (Orlitzky et al.,
2003; Melnyk et al., 2003; Eltayeb et al., 2011), improved quality (Melnyk et al., 2003),
wastes reduction (Azevedo et al., 2011), reduction of lead times (Melnyk et al., 2003),
improved profitability (Darnall et al., 2008; Menguc and Ozanne, 2005), positive stock
returns (Klassen and McLaughlin, 1996; Menguc and Ozanne, 2005) and energy
conservation (Cordano et al., 2010). GSCM practices may also lead to intangible benefits
including: enhanced competitiveness (Rao, 2002; Rao and Holt, 2005), increased
shareholders value (Bose and Pal, 2011), increased customer satisfaction (Azevedo et al.,
2011), improved job satisfaction (Jun et al., 2006), enhanced efficiency (Azevedo et al.,
2011) and new market opportunities (Diabat et al., 2013; Walley and Whitehead, 1994).
Elkington (1994) introduced the concept of “triple bottom line”, claiming that
sustainability is nothing but the intersection of economic, environmental and social
performance; however, this research adds another dimension that is operational
performance. Consequently, and based on the different effects GSCM practices can have
on CP, it can be claimed that they fall under four different performance dimensions:
environmental (such as waste reductions and resource savings), operational (such as
enhanced efficiency and improved quality), economic (such as improved profitability
and positive stock returns) and social (such as improved job satisfaction and enhanced
health and safety). The section below elaborates more on each of these dimensions, while Green supply
Figure 1 portrays how they are interrelated. chain
2.5.1 Environmental performance. This research adopts a modified version of the management
definition developed by Zhu et al. (2008), thus environmental performance refers to: the
ability of the organization to reduce air emissions, effluent waste and solid wastes and
the ability to decrease consumption of hazardous and toxic material and decreased
frequency for environmental accidents. 223
2.5.2 Operational performance. This research uses a modified version of Melnyk
et al.’s (2003) and Zhu et al.’s (2008) definition for operational performance; therefore,
operational performance refers to the organization’s capabilities to more efficiently
produce and deliver products to customers with improved quality and reduced lead
times which ultimately lead to improving its position in the marketplace and increasing
its chances in selling its products into international markets.
2.5.3 Economic performance. This research adopts an extended version of Green and
Inman (2005) and Zhu et al. (2007) definition for economic performance; hence, economic
performance is defined as the financial and marketing performance improvements
resulted from implementing GSCM practices that lead to enhancing the firm’s position
compared to the industry average. The financial improvement encompasses increased
costs for material purchasing, decreased costs for energy consumption, decreased cost
for wastes discharge and decreased costs for environmental accidents. The
marketing-based improvements include: increased average return on sales, increased
average profit and profit growth and increased average market share growth.
2.5.4 Social performance. The research adopts Wood’s (1991) definition for social
performance which is:
[…] a business organization’s configuration of principles of social responsibility, processes of
social responsiveness, and policies, programs and observable outcomes as they relate to the
firm’s societal relationships.
2.6 Control variables

To maximize robustness and reliability of the results, the model considers three control
variables, namely, possession of EMS certification, firm size and firm age. These three
variables were selected because earlier studies found a significant effect of these
variables on the dependent variables used in this study.
3. Research framework and hypotheses

Based on the above literature review, it can be argued that there is a debate on whether
implementing GSCM practices leads to improving or weakening CP and therefore, there
is a lack of consensus on the GSCM impact on CP (Laosirihongthong et al., 2013). Zhu
et al. (2012) argue that such conflicting results may create a barrier for organizations
planning to adopt GSCM practices. Hence, this research aims to investigate the impact of
GSCM practices implementation on CP from a 360-degree perspective. Figure 2
illustrates the theoretical model guiding this research.
Based on the model displayed in Figure 2, this research proposes 16 hypotheses, as
given below.
CR
26,3
224
Figure 1.
Performance model
Green supply
chain
management
225
Figure 2.
Theoretical model
3.1 Green supply chain management practices and environmental performance

H1a. There is a positive relationship between implementation of eco-design
practices and corporate environmental performance when external variables
are controlled.
H1b. There is a positive relationship between implementation of green purchasing
practices and corporate environmental performance when external variables
are controlled.
H1c. There is a positive relationship between implementation of environmental
cooperation practices and corporate environmental performance when
external variables are controlled.
H1d. There is a positive relationship between implementation of reverse logistics
practices and the corporate environmental performance when external
variables are controlled.
3.2 Green supply chain management practices and operational performance

H2a. There is a positive relationship between implementation of eco– design
practices and corporate operational performance when external variables are
controlled.
practices and corporate operational performance when external variables are
controlled.
cooperation practices and corporate operational performance when external
CR H2d. There is a positive relationship between implementation of reverse logistics
26,3 practices and corporate operational performance when external variables are
controlled.
3.3 Green supply chain management practices and economic performance

226 practices and corporate economic performance when external variables are
controlled.
practices and corporate economic performance when external variables are
controlled.
cooperation practices and corporate economic performance when external

practices and corporate economic performance.
3.4 Green supply chain management practices and social performance

practices and corporate social performance when external variables are
controlled.
controlled.
cooperation practices and corporate social performance when external
controlled.
4. Research methodology
Given the deductive nature of the study that suggests a model with a causal relationship
between green supply chain practices and CP requiring validation using empirical data,
a quantitative approach is adopted using information gathered through a survey
questionnaire to obtain categorical data needed for the statistical testing.
4.1 Measurement
Measuring the operationalized constructs in this research was from different sources.
For example, eco-design was measured using four items adopted from Zsidisin and
Hendrick (1998) and Carter and Ellram (1998). Green purchasing was measured using
five items adopted from Zsidisin and Hendrick (1998) and Walton et al. (1998). For
environmental cooperation, the research used eight measures adopted from three
different sources: Zsidisin and Hendrick (1998); Walton et al. (1998) and Vachon and
Klassen (2006). Reverse logistics was measured using three items adopted from Rao Green supply
(2007). chain
The measurement of the independent variable dimensions was from different
sources as explained hereafter.
management
Environmental performance is measured using five items adopted from Zhu et al.
(2007). Whereas, operational performance was measured using six items adopted from
Melnyk et al. (2003). The economic performance was measured using four items adopted 227
from Zhu et al. (2007) and three items adopted from Green and Inman (2005). Finally, the
social performance variable was measured using five items: three items were adopted
from Rao (2002), one item adopted from Homburg and Stock (2004) and Zhu et al. (2008)
and the last item was adopted from Cordano et al. (2010). Table I summarizes the
measurement items adopted for each construct and their sources
4.2 Population and sample selection

The population for this study consists of all ISO 14001-certified and non-certified
manufacturing firms in the UAE, and the list was provided by Dun & Bradstreet Middle
Est.
It was decided to send the survey to firms with 50 employees and above to ensure that
small firms classified under manufacturing such as tailor shops for example are
excluded. Dun & Bradstreet provided a list of 1,840 manufacturing firms in the whole of
UAE that fall under this category. On reaching the respondents for a survey, almost 869
were unwilling to participate; therefore, the final population size was 971 firms.
4.3 Details of the instrument and survey

The survey questionnaire has three sections in addition to the introduction which is
meant to brief the reader with the parts and the purpose of the survey. The first section
of the survey aims to collect pertinent information on the characteristics of the
respondents and their organizations including their titles, the organization scope of
business, legal status, years of experience in the business, size and possession of EMS.
The second section elaborates on GSCM initiatives adopted by the organization
covering the four main GSCM practices introduced above. The third section solicits
information on the impact of such GSCM initiatives on the corporate environmental,
economic, operational and social performance.
The survey was sent via an online survey tool (survey monkey) to the environment
management representative within each firm. An online survey tool is used because it is
more convenient and cost-effective and the responses can be easily exported to the data
analysis application for statistical testing (i.e. SPSS). The survey was sent in two waves
with a two-week gap between each wave. The survey was closed 42 days (six weeks)
after its commencement date. The first wave of the questionnaire was sent on October 1,
2014, while the second wave sent after two weeks, i.e. on October 15, 2014. Four
reminders were sent to encourage participation one every week, with the first wave
closed at the end of Week 6, i.e. November 12, 2014.
4.4 Results
In total, 143 responses were received with 14.7 per cent response rate; however, only 117
responses were found complete which could be used for the statistical testing.
CR Variable Measurement item Source
26,3
Eco-design Design of products for reduced consumption of Zsidisin and Hendrick
material/energy (1998), Carter and
Design of products for reuse, recycle, recovery of material, Ellram (1998)
component parts
Design of products to avoid or reduce use of hazardous
228 products
Design of processes for minimization of waste
Green purchasing Provide design specification to suppliers that include Zsidisin and Hendrick
environmental requirements for purchased items (1998), Walton et al.
Environmental audit for suppliers’ internal management (1998)
Second-tier supplier environmentally friendly practice
evaluation
Suppliers are selected using environmental criteria
Require suppliers to use environmental packaging

(degradable and non-hazardous)
Environmental Cooperation with suppliers and customers for eco-design Zsidisin and Hendrick
cooperation Cooperation with suppliers and customers for cleaner (1998), Walton et al.
production (1998)
Cooperation with suppliers and customers for green
packaging
Cooperation with supplies and customers for using less
energy during product transportation
Developing a mutual understanding of responsibilities Vachon and Klassen
regarding environmental performance (2006)
Working together to reduce environmental impact of our
activities
Conducting joint planning to anticipate and resolve
environmental-related problems
Making joint decisions with other supply chain members
about ways to reduce overall environmental impact of our
products
Reverse logistics Use of remanufacturing Rao (2007)
Recovery of the company’s end-of-life products
Taking back packaging
Environmental Reduced air emission Zhu et al. (2007)
performance Reduced waste water
Reduced solid wastes
Decreased consumption for hazardous/harmful/toxic
materials
Decreased frequency for environmental accidents
Improve a company’s environmental situation
Economic Decreased cost for materials purchasing Green and Inman
performance Decreased cost for energy consumption (2005)
Decreased fee for waste treatment and discharge
Decreased fine for environmental accidents
Average return on sales and investment over the past
three years
Average profit and profit growth over the past three years
Table I. Average market share growth over the past three years
Measurement items (continued)
Variable Measurement item Source
Green supply
chain
Social Improved corporate image Rao (2002)
performance Social commitment
management
Preserve environment
Enhanced employee job satisfaction Homburg and Stock
(2004), Zhu et al.
(2008) 229
Enhanced health and safety of employees Cordano et al. (2010)
Operational Significantly reduced lead times Melnyk et al. (2003)
performance Significantly improved product quality
Significantly improved its position in the market place
Helped the company design/develop better products
Implementing green practices helps in reducing all types
of wastes
Improved its chances in successfully selling its products

in international markets Table I.
4.5 Responding firms’ characteristics

Table II represents the characteristics of the respondents and their firms; almost 82
per cent of the respondents are represented from the middle management positions,
while around 9 per cent are holding top positions and the rest are in supervisory and
non-managerial levels. Thus, it is evident that the information provided was from
people who are having the knowledge and experience in GSCM practices within
their organizations. As long as the location is concerned, the table shows that almost
50 per cent of the firms are based in Dubai, 25 per cent in Abu Dhabi, 15 per cent in
Sharjah and the rest are in the remaining emirates. The table shows that
organizations included in the survey fall into three main categories in terms of size:
small (51-100 employees), medium (101-300 employees) and large (301- 5,000
employees) with only two organizations having more than 5,000 employees. For the
firm age, the table shows that almost 75 per cent of the organizations surveyed are
in the business for more than 10 years and therefore capable of assessing GSCM
practices and their related impact on performance over time. This represents a
sizable representation of the organizations that have been involved in green supply
chain practices and supports the validity and reliability of the findings. The table
also shows that 85 per cent of the organizations surveyed are private owned, 7.7
per cent multinational companies and the rest are government and
semi-government. This implies that the private sector which plays a key role in
green supply chain practices is well represented in this study. The EMS certification
shows that almost 48 per cent of the firms surveyed are EMS certified and this in
turn confirms that the GSCM information provided is from the firms that
implemented some sorts of GSCM practices and therefore can be deemed reliable.
4.6 Validity and reliability

For content validity, the survey was shared with some industry experts to get their feedback
and revise accordingly in case of any edits required. Moreover, a pre-test of the survey took
place with a number of selected companies for the purpose of testing the understanding of
the instrument and making any relevant changes thereof. To examine non-response bias,
CR Item description Frequency (%)
26,3
Participants position in the organization
Top management (i.e. President, CEO, Vice President) 11 9.4
Middle Management (i.e. Director, Senior Manager, Manager) 96 82.1
Supervisory level (i.e. senior officer, officer, coordinator) 5 4.3
230 Non-managerial (i.e. accountant, assistant, specialist, etc.) 5 4.3
Total 117 100.0
Location of responding firms in UAE
Abu Dhabi 25 21.4
Dubai 59 50.4
Sharjah 18 15.4
Ajman 4 3.4
Umm al-Quwain 1 0.9
Ras Al Khaima 7 6.0

Fujairah 3 2.6
Total 117 100.0
Size of firms (Number of employees)
51-100 39 33.3
101-300 37 31.6
301-500 15 12.8
501-5000 24 20.5
More than 5000 2 1.7
Total 117 100.0
Number of years in business
1-5 5 4.3
6-10 20 17.1
11-20 34 29.1
21 or more 58 49.6
Total 117 100.0
Legal status and ownership
Government 4 3.4
Semi-government 4 3.4
Private company 100 85.5
MNC 9 7.7
Total 117 100.0
EMS certification
Table II. Yes 56 48.0
Characteristics of No 61 52.0
responding firms Total 117 100
the survey was sent in two waves, and the test for the non-response bias was conducted
using Armstrong and Overton’s (1977) approach to ensure no difference exists between
early and late responses. To measure the reliability of the measurements and to verify
the internal consistency of the constructs, Cronbach’s alpha was used as displayed in
Table III. The results indicate that all the values are above 0.7 and this confirms that the
constructs are acceptable (Cronbach, 1951).
4.7 Descriptive statistics of independent variables Green supply
Table IV shows the means for the four IV constructs. With respect to the practices, it is chain
clear that, on an average, the eco-design construct contains the strongest practices
(Mean ⫽ 3.76, SD ⫽ 1.34), followed by the reverse logistics (Mean ⫽ 2.81, SD ⫽ 1.47),
management
followed by environmental cooperation construct (Mean ⫽ 2.77, SD ⫽ 1.31). The weakest
practices are identified as the green purchasing (Mean ⫽ 2.7, SD ⫽ 1.38). The suggestion
therefore is that, the UAE manufacturers pay good attention to the eco-design of their 231
products and the reverse logistics and product take back driven primarily by the close
cooperation between the supply chain members on environment-related matters. In
contrast, there is less attention paid to green purchasing, indicating that auditing
suppliers for environmental commitment and selecting them based on environmental
criteria are not considered as much of priority compared to other practices.
4.8 Descriptive statistics of dependent variables

Table V shows the means for each DV construct. In terms of performance constructs, all
the four constructs show relatively high levels of attainment with the exception of the
economic performance, which, on an average, was slightly weaker than the other three
constructs (Mean ⫽ 2.65,SD ⫽ 1.19). Social performance was found to be the strongest
construct (Mean ⫽ 3.79, SD ⫽ 1.0) followed by environmental performance (Mean ⫽
3.75, SD ⫽ 1.04) and finally operational performance (Mean ⫽ 3.41, SD ⫽ 1.08). The
explanation is that many UAE manufacturers are getting a positive image of their
products and organizations in the perception of their customers, employees and
suppliers while at the same time are reducing the negative impact of their activities on
environment and improving the quality of their products and delivery lead time.
4.9 Factor analysis

As per Hair et al. (2010), in addition to adequate sample size (observations must be equal
or more than ten times the number of variables), three main items were checked and
Variable No. of items Cronbach’s ␣
Eco-design 4 0.826
Green purchasing 5 0.832
Environmental cooperation 8 0.888
Reverse logistics 3 0.710
Environmental performance 6 0.860
Operational performance 6 0.890 Table III.
Economic performance 7 0.921 Cronbach’s ␣
Social performance 5 0.891 variables
Variable No. of items Minimum Maximum Mean SD
Eco-design 4 1 5 3.76 1.34

Green purchasing 5 1 5 2.70 1.38 Table IV.
Environmental cooperation 8 1 5 2.77 1.31 IV descriptive
Reverse logistics 3 1 5 2.81 1.47 statistics
CR confirmed before proceeding with factor analysis: first, strong foundational rationale
26,3 supporting the existence of a structure; second, an existence of sufficient correlation
among the variables supported by Barlett’s test of sphericity with a sigma value less
than 0.05; and finally, measure of sampling adequacy with values for each variable
exceeding 0.5 and if not to be deleted one at a time (p. 105). After carrying out the factor
analysis, total variance explained was examined as well as factor loadings and
232 commonalities which were all within the acceptable range as per Nunnally and
Bernstein (1994). Table VI displays the output of the factor analysis conducted.
The indicators for the “eco-design” construct explain 66.29 per cent of the total
variance in the data. The values for the other constructs are as follows: green purchasing
(66.419 per cent); environmental cooperation (58.426 per cent); reverse logistics (63.187
per cent); environmental performance (63.332 per cent); economic performance (75.88 per
cent); operational performance (64.702 per cent) and social performance (69.942 per cent).
Factor loadings for all measurement items are above 0.7 as shown in the table.
Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy value for the eight constructs is
greater than 0.50 as recommended by Kaiser (1974), and therefore factor analysis is
appropriate for the data. Bartlett’s test of sphericity tests the appropriateness for the
factor analysis; the sigma values for the eight constructs are all 0.0 and therefore less
than ␣ at 5 per cent which confirms that factor analysis is appropriate for the selected
data.
4.10 Multiple regression analysis

Multiple regressions analysis was used to test the relationship between the independent
variables and the dependent variables because it helps to analyze the relationship
between a single dependent variable (each dimension of CP at a time) and several
independent variables (GSCM practices).
The first set of hypotheses (H1a-H1d) examined the relationship between GSCM
practices and environmental performance. None of the four GSCM practices were found
to have any impact on the environmental performance. Table VII summarizes the
results of the environmental performance hypotheses.
The second set of hypotheses (H2a-H2d) examined the relationship between GSCM
practices and operational performance. Only green purchasing (␤ ⫽ 0.219) and
environmental cooperation (␤ ⫽ 0.27) were found to have a significant impact on
operational performance; therefore, H3b and H3c are supported but not H3a or H3d.
Table VIII summarizes the hypotheses results for operational performance.
The third set of hypotheses (H3a-H3d) examined the impact of GSCM practices on
the economic performance. The results show that only green purchasing has a
significant impact (␤ ⫽ 0.328) on the economic performance; therefore, only H3b is
supported. Table IX summarizes the results for the economic performance hypotheses.
Variable No. of items Minimum Maximum Mean SD
Environmental performance 6 1 5 3.75 1.04

Table V. Operational performance 6 1 5 3.41 1.08
DVs descriptive Economic performance 7 1 5 2.64 1.19
statistics Social performance 5 1 5 3.79 1.00
GSCM practices and Bartlett’s Factor Variance

CP Code Measurement items KMO significance loadings explained
Eco-design (ED) ED1 Design of products for reduced consumption of material/energy 0.811 0.000 0.815 66.298
ED2 Design of products for reuse, recycle, recovery of material, component parts 0.813
ED3 Design of products to avoid or reduce use of hazardous products 0.790
ED4 Design of processes for minimization of waste 0.839
Green purchasing GP1 Provide design specification to suppliers that include environmental 0.819 0.000 0.737 66.419
(GP) requirements for purchased items
GP2 Environmental audit for suppliers’ internal management 0.835
GP3 Second-tier supplier environmentally friendly practice evaluation 0.830
GP4 Suppliers are selected using environmental criteria 0.794
Environmental EC1 Cooperation with suppliers and customers for eco-design 0.874 0.000 0.721 58.426
cooperation (EC) EC2 Cooperation with suppliers and customers for cleaner production 0.780
EC3 Cooperation with suppliers and customers for green packaging 0.755
EC4 Cooperation with suppliers and customers for using less energy 0.745
EC5 Working together to reduce environmental impact of our activities 0.784
EC6 Conducting joint planning to anticipate and resolve environmental-related 0.754
problems
EC7 Making joint decisions with other supply chain members about ways to 0.809
reduce overall environmental impact of our products
Reverse logistics (RL) RL1 Use of remanufacturing 0.642 0.000 0.827 63.187
RL2 Recovery of the company’s end-of-life products 0.843
RL3 Taking back packaging 0.709
Environmental EP1 Reduced waste water 0.850 0.000 0.786 63.332
performance (EP) EP2 Reduced solid wastes 0.724
EP3 Decreased consumption for hazardous/harmful/toxic materials 0.819
EP4 Decreased frequency for environmental accidents 0.795
EP5 Improve a company’s environmental situation 0.799
(continued)
performance
Table VI.
233
practices and
management
chain
Green supply
green supply chain

Factor analysis of
CR
26,3
234
Table VI.
GSCM practices and Bartlett’s Factor Variance
CP Code Measurement items KMO significance loadings explained
Economic EcP1 Decreased cost for materials purchasing 0.899 0.000 0.867 75.880
performance (EcP) EcP2 Decreased cost for energy consumption 0.816
EcP3 Decreased fee for waste treatment and discharge 0.825
EcP4 Average return on sales and investment over the past three years 0.894
EcP5 Average profit and profit growth over the past three years 0.922
EcP6 Average market share growth over the past three years 0.897
Operational OP1 Significantly reduced lead times 0.848 0.000 0.824 64.702
performance (OP) OP2 Significantly improved product quality 0.776
OP3 Significantly improved its position in the market place 0.788
OP4 Helped the company design/develop better products 0.837
OP5 Implementing green practices helps in reducing all types of wastes 0.746
OP6 Improved its chances in successfully selling its products in international 0.850
markets
Social performance SP1 Improved corporate image 0.784 0.000 0.868 69.942
(SP) SP2 Social commitment 0.881
SP3 Preserve environment 0.738
SP4 Enhanced employee job satisfaction 0.810
SP5 Enhanced health and safety of employees 0.875
The final set of hypotheses (H4a-H4d) examined the relationship between GSCM Green supply
practices and the social performance. The results show that only reverse logistics chain
practices have a significant impact (␤ ⫽ 0.208) on the social performance, and thus only
H4d is supported. Table X summarizes the social performance hypotheses results.
management
5. Discussion
The study found that EMS certification is associated with all dimensions of CP and such 235
an association is a good indication that firms in the UAE are going into the right
direction because EMS implementation and certification forms the basis for any green
initiative to drive CP into the desired green direction. Such a finding was also echoed by
Melnyk et al. (2003). The authors found that there is a positive relationship between the
presence of formal certified EMS and improved performance such as reduced costs
Research hypothesis ␤ Status
1a ED ⬎ EP 0.139 Not supported Table VII.

1b GP ⬎ EP 0.038 Not supported Environmental
1c EC ⬎ EP 0.175 Not supported performance
1d RL ⬎ EP 0.031 Not supported hypotheses results
2a ED ⬎ OP ⫺0.11 Not supported

2b GP ⬎ OP 0.219** Supported
2c EC ⬎ OP 0.27** Supported Table VIII.
2d RL ⬎ OP 0.078 Not supported Operational
performance
Note: Significant at **␣ ⫽ 0.10 hypotheses results
3a ED ⬎ EcP ⫺0.156 Not supported

3b GP ⬎ EcP 0.328** Supported
3c EC ⬎ EcP 0.211 Not supported Table IX.
3d RL ⬎ EcP 0.069 Not supported Economic
performance
4a ED ⬎ SP 0.012 Not supported

4b GP ⬎ SP ⫺0.051 Not supported
4c EC ⬎ SP 0.011 Not supported
4d RL ⬎ SP 0.208** Supported Table X.
Social performance
CR (EcP), improved quality (OP), reduction of waste in the design and equipment selection
26,3 process (EP) and reduction of lead times (OP). Additionally, Gonzalez et al. (2008) found
that there is a significant relationship between the possession of certified EMS and
demand on suppliers to implement environmental practices. As per Dun and Bradstreet,
UAE, more than 4,000 firms are ISO 14001 certified in the UAE and more are in the
certification stages, and this, in turn, indicates that firms in the UAE have started
236 realizing the importance of being green conscious.
With regards to the firm size, the study found that firm size impacts all dimensions of
CP except operational performance. Small firms might find it difficult to allocate
resources for green initiatives for which potential benefits may not materialize in the
short term.
Firm age, as a control variable, was found to have no impact on any corporate
dimension. Such a finding reveals that newly established firms and those that have been
in the business for many years have the same view when it comes to green initiatives
and their impact on CP.
Although environmental performance showed high levels of attainment as discussed
in the descriptive statistics, and ranked second after social performance (Mean ⫽ 3.75,
SD ⫽ 1.04), the study found that none of the independent variables have any impact on
the environmental performance. Similar findings were also reported by Green et al.
(2012). The author found no significant relationship between green purchasing and
environmental performance. Furthermore, Simpson et al. (2007) reported that no
significant relationship was found between environmental commitment and
environmental performance. The explanation is that organizations in the UAE
implement GSCM practices without assessing which practices deliver the best outcome,
for example Lo (2014) claims that reverse logistics practices might deliver better
performance outcomes than eco-design practices for firms in the downstream of the
supply chain. It also differs from one industry to another, and green purchasing
practices might lead to better performance outcomes than eco-design for firms in the
textile manufacturing industry.
The study found that green purchasing and environmental cooperation are
positively related to operational performance. These results square with the results
reported recently by Diabat et al. (2013). The authors found that environmental
cooperation is one of the most important GSCM practices that can lead to better
operational performance outcomes. Such interesting findings in this study might be due
to some recent regulations such as “Istedama”, Pearl Rating and “Green Building”
initiatives launched by the UAE Government aimed at motivating supply chain
members to work more closely together to deliver more sustainable products and
projects.
Both eco-design and reverse logistics were found to have no impact on operational
performance. Similar findings were also reported by Richey et al. (2005). The researchers
found that the implementation of reverse logistics procedures did not improve the
corporate operational performance. Although both practices were found to be the most
highly adopted GSCM practices in the UAE, they failed to impact the operational
performance. It may be possible that the level of implementation was not sufficient
enough to lead to better outcomes (Zhu and Sarkis, 2006). Both practices require
cooperation with other chain members for the benefits to be realized; however, the study
did not find such cooperation as environmental cooperation was ranked third in terms of Green supply
adoption by the firms surveyed. chain
As far as economic performance is concerned, only green purchasing was found to management
have a significant impact on economic performance of the four GSCM practices.
Surprisingly, both variables are having the lowest levels of adoption and attainment. In
other words, green purchasing is the lowest GSCM practice in terms of implementation,
and economic performance is the lowest in terms of attainment. The only explanation is 237
that the improvement in the economic performance of firms in the UAE in the green
context is mainly due to green purchasing practices. Green purchasing practices
therefore are important for firms that have limited resources and want to realize
economic benefits in the short term. Analogous results were found by Green et al. (2012).
The researcher found that within the US manufacturing industry, green purchasing is
positively linked to economic performance.
The study did not find any significant impact of other green practices on the
corporate economic performance. It is possible that other practices might be
long-term-oriented and entail huge initial investments such as pollution prevention
systems, R&D in eco-design products and so on, but green purchasing is less
capital-intensive, as it is an externally oriented green supply chain initiative (Eltayeb
et al., 2011). Eltayeb et al. (2011) found that better economic performance is the main
driver for Malaysian firms to adopt green purchasing practices which might be the case
of most of the firms in the UAE, as reported by the study.
Only reverse logistics practices were found to have a significant impact on the
corporate social performance. Reverse logistics was found to be the second highly
implemented green supply chain practice in the UAE after eco-design, while social
performance had the highest attainment level. Therefore, it is not surprising to have
such a relationship.
6. Conclusion
The impact of implementing GSCM practices on CP has not received a great deal of
interest within the UAE context, and therefore tackling this area was deemed necessary.
Earlier studies reported variegated results on the impact of implementation of GSCM
practices on CP in different industries and using different measures and dimensions of
CP.
This study shed light on GSCM practices currently adopted by business
organizations in the UAE and their impact on CP in an attempt to motivate them to
maintain an environmentally benign position while continuously endeavoring to
improve the environmental, operational, economic and social aspects of CP.
The study found that operational performance positively improved when
implementing green purchasing and environmental cooperation practices; therefore,
organizations aiming to improve the quality of their products and shorten the lead times
may need to involve upstream and downstream supply chain members and work
collaboratively with them from design stages all the way through disposal.
Green purchasing has been found to be a good tool for economic vitality as it
improves the firm’s economic performance resulting from reduction in material and
energy consumption, as well as improvements in market share, average sales return and
average profit.
CR Firms interested in their corporate image and the social commitment shall devote
26,3 more resources to implement reverse logistics practices which are found to impact social
performance positively. Employee job satisfaction and health and safety measures are
also improved once social performance is improved and thus firms need to actively
involve and participate in reverse logistics campaigns.
In conclusion and to answer the research question, it can be claimed that overall,
238 GSCM practices impact CP positively. However, if the firm is interested in certain
dimensions of CP, for example, operational performance, then green purchasing and
environmental cooperation are the most important green practices that influence such
dimensions. On the other hand, if the firm is more interested in pecuniary outcomes, then
only green purchasing can help improve the corporate economic performance. Lastly,
societal-oriented firms that intend to develop social acumen to maintain the corporate
image need to focus on reverse logistics practices.
7. Managerial implications
Supply chain managers need to carefully select the right mix of green supply chain
practices to drive CP to the desired levels. Some practices may improve certain
performance dimensions; therefore, it is crucial to decide which performance dimension
brings the most value to the organization and consequently work with other chain
members to implement the practices that improve it.
8. Further researches
Extending this study to other industrial sectors in the UAE may provide fruitful
avenues to understand how the performance of these firms behaves toward GSCM
practices implementation and how they comply with mounting environmental
regulations in the construction, transportation or other environment-sensitive sectors.
It can be claimed that this study lays the foundations for future researches in other
Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries such as Saudi Arabia where the
manufacturing industry is booming. Qatar, on the other hand, is witnessing
unprecedented economic vitality in almost all sectors including oil and gas, construction
and aviation, and therefore looking at its firms’ position on the environmental radar and
the different green practices implemented would be intriguing.
Further studies may investigate the impact of EMS certifications such as ISO 14001
on different CP dimensions within the UAE business organizations to assess whether
such certifications play any role in improving their environmental acumen.
9. Limitations
Some limitations cannot be overcome in this study which are threefold; first, this study
was limited to firms in manufacturing industry only, and this was due to the realization
that manufacturing industry in any region accounts for a big portion of the
environmental impacts and that manufacturing is greatly involved in the depletion of
natural resources. Second, the study was limited to manufacturing industries in the
UAE and that was due to the fact that the research purposefully intended to find out
what GSCM practices the UAE businesses embark on and how they relate to the
different magnitudes of CP and accordingly offer some insights based on the data
gathered and the analysis thereafter. Other GCC countries for example may have similar
socio-cultural situations to the UAE, but the UAE is marching ahead with different
green initiatives such as “Istedama”, Emirates Green Buildings and Masdar which all
make it different and entail studying it singly. Finally, the study did not differentiate Green supply
between early and late adopters of green supply chain practices which was due to chain
difficulties in capturing such information, which, if gathered, could have provided a
deeper look into how the different corporate performance dimensions are impacted over
management
time and how the green practices implementation outcomes are realized.
References 239
Agrawal, S., Singh, R. and Murtaza, Q. (2014), “Forecasting product returns for recycling in Indian
electronics industry”, Journal of Advances in Management Research, Vol. 11 No. 1,
pp. 102-114.
Agrawal, S., Singh, R. and Murtaza, Q. (2015), “Review: a literature review and perspectives in
reverse logistics”, Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Vol. 97, pp. 76-92.
Armstrong, J. and Overton, T. (1977), “Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys”, Journal of
Marketing Research, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 396-402.

Azevedo, S., Carvalho, H. and Machado, V. (2011), “The influence of green practices on supply
chain performance: a case study approach”, Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and
Transportation Review, Vol. 47 No. 6, pp. 850-871.
Beamon, A. (1999), “Designing the green supply chain”, Logistics Information Management,
Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 330-353.
Benito, J. and Benito, O. (2005), “Environmental proactivity and business performance: an
empirical analysis”, Omega-International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 33 No. 1,
pp. 1-15.
Bose, I. and Pal, R. (2011), “Do green supply chain management initiatives impact stock prices of
firms?”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 52 No. 3, pp. 624-634.
Carter, C. and Easton, P. (2011), “Sustainable supply chain management: evolution and future
directions”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management,
Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 46-62.
Carter, C. and Ellram, L. (1998), “Reverse logistics: a review of the literature and framework for
future investigation”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 85-102.
Cordano, M., Marshall, R. and Silverman, M. (2010), “How do small and medium enterprises go
‘Green’? A study of environmental management programs in the US wine industry”,
Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 92 No. 3, pp. 463-478.
Cronbach, L. and Warrington, W. (1951), “Time-limit tests: estimating their reliability and degree
of speeding”, Psychometrika, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 167-188.
Darnall, N., Jolley, J. and Handfield, R. (2008), “Environmental management systems and green
supply chain management: complements for sustainability?”, Business Strategy and the
Environment, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 30-45.
Deutz, P., McGuire, M. and Neighbour, G. (2013), “Eco-design practice in the context of a
structured design process: an interdisciplinary empirical study of UK manufacturers”,
Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 39, pp. 117-128.
Diabat, A., Khodaverdi, R. and Olfat, L. (2013), “An exploration of green supply chain practices
and performance in an automotive industry”, International Journal of Advanced
Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 68 No. 1, pp. 949-961.
Elkington, J. (1994), “Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for
sustainable development”, CA Management Review, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 90-100.
Eltayeb, T. and Zailani, S. (2009), “Going green through green supply chain initiatives towards
environmental sustainability”, Operations and Supply Chain Management, Vol. 2 No. 2,
pp. 93-110.
CR Eltayeb, T., Zailani, S. and Ramayah, T. (2011), “Green supply chain initiatives among certified
companies in Malaysia and environmental sustainability: investigating the outcomes”,
26,3 Resources Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 55 No. 5, pp. 495-506.
Gonzalez, P., Sarkis, J. and Díaz, B. (2008), “Environmental management system certification and
its influence on corporate practices: evidence from the automotive industry”, International
Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 28 No. 11, pp. 1021-1041.
240 Green, K. and Inman, R. (2005), “Using a just-in-time selling strategy to strengthen supply chain
linkages”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 43 No. 16, pp. 3437-3453.
Green, K., Zelbst, P., Meacham, J. and Bhadauria, V. (2012), “Green supply chain management
practices: impact on performance”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal,
Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 290-305.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B. and Anderson, R. (2010), Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed., Pearson
Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Hervani, A., Helms, M. and Sarkis, J. (2005), “Performance measurement for green supply chain
management”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 330-353.
Homburg, C. and Stock, R. (2004), “The Link between salespeople’s job satisfaction and customer
satisfaction in a business-to-business context: a Dyadic analysis”, Journal of the Academy
of Marketing Science, Vol. 32 No. 2, p. 144.
Johansson, G. (2002), “Success factors for integration of eco design in product development: a
review of state of the art”, Environmental Management and Health, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 98-107.
Jun, M., Cai, S. and Shin, H. (2006), “TQM practice in maquiladora: antecedents of employee
satisfaction and loyalty” Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 24 No. 6, pp. 791-812.
King, A. and Lenox, M. (2001), “Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm
environmental and financial performance”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 5 No. 1,
pp. 105-116.
Klassen, R. and McLaughlin, C. (1996), “The impact of environmental management on firm
performance”, Management Science, Vol. 42 No. 8, pp. 1199-1214.
Kumar, S. and Putnam, V. (2008), “Cradle to cradle: reverse logistics strategies and opportunities
across three industries”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 15 No. 2,
pp. 305-315.
Kung, F., Huang, C. and Cheng, C. (2012), “Assessing the green value chain to improve
environmental performance: evidence from Taiwan’s manufacturing industry”,
International Journal of Development Issues, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 111-128.
Laosirihongthong, T., Adebanjo, D. and Tan, K. (2013), “Green supply chain management
practices and performance”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 113 No. 8,
pp. 1088-1109.
Large, R. and Thomsen, C. (2011), “Drivers of green supply management performance:
evidence from Germany”, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 17 No. 3,
pp. 176-184.
Lee, S., Kim, S. and Choi, D. (2012), “Green supply chain management and organizational
performance”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 112 No. 8, pp. 1148-1180.
Liang, S. and Chang, W. (2008), “An empirical study on relationship between green supply chain
management and SME performance in China”, Call of Paper Proceedings of 2008
International Conference on Management Science and Engineering, China, pp. 611-618.
Lo, S. (2014), “Effects of supply chain position on the motivation and practices of firms going
green”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 34 No. 1,
pp. 93-114.
Melnyk, S., Sroufe, R. and Calantone, R. (2003), “Assessing the impact of environmental Green supply
management systems on corporate and environmental performance”, Journal of Operations
Management, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 329-351.
chain
Menguc, B. and Ozanne, L. (2005), “Challenges of the ‘green imperative’: a natural resource-based management
approach to the environmental orientation-business performance relationship”, Journal of
Business Research, Vol. 58 No. 4, pp. 430-438.
Min, H. and Galle, W.P. (2001), “Green purchasing practices of US firms”, International Journal of
Production and Operations Management, Vol. 21 No. 9, pp. 1222-1238. 241
Montabon, F., Sroufe, R. and Narasimhan, R. (2007), “An examination of corporate reporting,
environmental management practices and firm performance”, Journal of Operations
Nunnally, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H. (1994), “Elements of statistical description and estimation”,
Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed., Edited by: Nunnally J.C., Bernstein I.H..
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. and Rynes, S. (2003), “Corporate social and financial performance: a
meta-analysis”, Organization Studies, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 403-441.

Perotti, S., Zorzini, M., Cagno, E. and Micheli, G. (2012), “Green supply chain practices and
company performance: the case of 3PLs in Italy”, International Journal of Physical
Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 42 No. 7, pp. 640-672.
Porter, M. (1991), “America green strategy”, Scientific American, Vol. 264 No. 4, p. 168.
Rao, P. (2002), “Greening the supply chain: a new initiative in South East Asia”, International
Journal of Operations Production Management, Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 632-655.
Rao, P. (2007), “Greening of the supply chain: an empirical study for SMES in the Philippine
context”, Journal of Asia Business Studies, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 55-66.
Rao, P. and Holt, D. (2005), “Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic
performance?”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 25
No. 9, pp. 898-916.
Richey, R., Chen, H., Genchev, S. and Daughert, P. (2005), “Developing effective reverse logistics
programs”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 34 No. 8, pp. 830-840.
Sarkis, J. (1998), “ Evaluating environmentally conscious business practices”, European Journal of
Operational Research, Vol. 107 No. 1, pp. 159-174.
Simpson, D., Power, D. and Samson, D. (2007), “Greening the automotive supply chain: a
relationship perspective”, International Journal of Operations and Production
Srivastava, S. (2007), “Green supply-chain management: a state-of the-art literature review”,
International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 53-80.
Sundarakani, B., de Souza, R., Goh, M., Wagner, S. and Manikandan, S. (2010), “Modeling carbon
footprints across the supply chain”, International Journal of Production Economics,
Vol. 128 No. 1, pp. 43-50,
Vachon, S. and Klassen, R. (2006), “Extending green practices across the supply chain: the impact
of upstream and downstream integration”, International Journal of Operations &
Production Management, Vol. 26 No. 7, pp. 795-821.
Walley, N. and Whitehead, B. (1994), “Its not easy being Green”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 72,
p. 46.
Walton, S., Handfield, R. and Melnyk, S. (1998), “The green supply chain: integrating suppliers
into environmental management processes”, Journal Of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 34
No. 2, pp. 2-11.
Watson, K., Klingenberg, B., Polito, T. and Geurts, T. (2004), “Impact of environmental
management system implementation on financial performance: a comparison of two
CR corporate strategies”, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal,
Vol. 15 No. 6, pp. 622-628.
26,3
Wood, D. (1991), “Corporate social performance revisited”, Academy of Management Review,
Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 691-718.
Zailani, S., Eltayeb, T., Hsu, C. and Tan, K. (2012), “The impact of external institutional drivers and
internal strategy on environmental performance”, International Journal of Operations and
242 Production Management, Vol. 32 No. 6, pp. 721-745.
Zhu, Q. and Sarkis, J. (2004), “Relationships between operational practices and performance
among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese
manufacturing enterprises”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 265-289.
Zhu, Q. and Sarkis, J. (2006), “An inter-sectorial comparison of green supply chain management in
China: drivers and practices”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 472-486.
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J. and Lai, K. (2007), “Initiatives and outcomes of green supply chain management
implementation by Chinese manufacturers”, Journal of Environmental Management,

Vol. 85 No. 1, pp. 179-189.
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J. and Lai, K. (2008), “Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain
management practices implementation”, International Journal of Production Economics,
Vol. 111 No. 2, pp. 261-273.
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J. and Lai, K. (2012), “Green supply chain management innovation diffusion and its
relationship to organizational improvement: an ecological modernization perspective”,
Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 168-185.
Zsidisin, G. and Hendrick, T. (1998), “Purchasing’s involvement in environmental issues: a
multi-country perspective”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 98 Nos 7/8,
pp. 313-320.
Zsidisin, G. and Siferd, S. (2001), “Environmental purchasing: a framework for theory
development”, European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 7 No. 1,
pp. 61-73.
Further reading
Anbumozhi, V. and Kanada, Y. (2005), “Greening the production and supply chains in Asia: is
there a role for voluntarily initiatives?”, IGES Kansai Research Centre Discussion Paper,
KRC 2005 No 6E.
Ann, G., Zailani, S. and Wahid, N. (2006), “A study on the impact of environmental management
system (EMS) certification towards firms’ performance in Malaysia”, Management of
Environmental Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 73-93.
APO (2004), Eco-product Directory, Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo.
Azorin, J., Cortes, E., Gamero, M. and Tari, J. (2009), “Green management and financial
performance: a literature review”, Management Decision, Vol. 47 No. 7, pp. 1080-1100.
Balasubramanian, S. (2012), “A hierarchical framework of barriers to green supply chain
management in the construction sector”, Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol. 5 No. 10,
pp. 15-27.
Banerjee, S., Iyer, E. and Kashyap, R. (2003), “Corporate environmentalism: antecedents and
influence of industry type”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 67 No. 2, pp. 106-122.
Bansal, P. and Hunter, T. (2003), “Strategic explanations for the early adoption of ISO 14001”,
Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 289-299.
Chen, C. (2005), “Incorporating green purchasing into the frame of ISO 14000”, Journal of Cleaner
Production, Vol. 13 No. 9, pp. 927-933.
Christmann, P. and Taylor, G. (2001), “Globalization and the environment: determinants of firm Green supply
self-regulation in China”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 32 No. 3,
pp. 439-458.
chain
Darnall, N., Jolley, G. and Handfield, R. (2006), “Environmental management systems and green management
supply chain management: complements for sustainability?”, Business Strategy and the
Environment, Vol. 18, pp. 30-45.
Davis, E. and Kay, J. (1990), “Assessing corporate performance”, Business Strategy Review, Vol. 1
No. 1, pp. 1-16. 243
De Giovanni, P. and Esposito Vinzi, V. (2012), “Covariance versus component-based estimations of
performance in green supply chain management”, International Journal of Production
Economics, Vol. 135 No. 2, pp. 907-916.
DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. (1983), “The Iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and
collective rationality in organizational fields”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 48 No. 2,
pp. 147-160.
Donnelly, K., Furnell, Z., Traeger, S., Okrasinski, T. and Holman, S. (2006), “Eco-design
implemented through a product-based environmental management system”, Journal of
Cleaner Production, Vol. 14 Nos 15/16, pp. 1357-1367.
Dun and Bradstreet (2014), “Company profile”, available at: www.dnbsame.com/company/in-the-
region (accessed 5 May 2014).
Eltayeb, T., Zailani, S. and Jayaraman, K. (2009), “The examination on the drivers for green
purchasing adoption among EMS 14001 certified companies in Malaysia”, Journal of
Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 206-225.
Eltayeb, T., Zailani, S. and Jayaraman, K. (2010), “The examination on the drivers for green
purchasing adoption among EMS 14001 certified companies in Malaysia”, Journal of
Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 206-225.
Fogler, H. and Nutt, F. (1975), “A note on social responsibility and stock valuation”, Academy of
Management Journal, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 155-160.
Freedman, M. and Jaggi, B. (1982), “The SEC’s pollution disclosure requirements: are they
meaningful?”, California Management Review, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 60-67.
Friedman, M. (1962), Capitalism and Freedom, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Friend, G. (2009), The Truth about Green Business, 1st ed., Pearson Education, New Jersey.
Geffen, C. and Rothenberg, S. (2000), “Suppliers and environmental innovation: the automotive
paint process”, The International Journal of Operations and Production Management,
Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 166-186.
Godfrey, R. (1998), “Ethical purchasing: developing the supply chain beyond the environmental”,
in Russel, T. (Ed.), Greener Purchasing: Opportunities and Innovations, Greenleaf
Publishing, Sheffield, pp. 244-251.
Gonzalez, J. (2008), “The effect of manufacturing proactivity on environmental management: an
exploratory analysis”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 46 No. 24,
pp. 7010-7038.
Hsu, C.W. and Hu, A.H. (2008), “Green supply chain management in the electronic industry”,
International Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 205-216.
Huang, Y.C., Wu, Y.C. and Rahman, S. (2012), “The task environment, resource commitment and
reverse logistics performance: evidence from the Taiwanese high-tech sector”, Production
Planning and Control, Vol. 23 Nos 10/11, pp. 851-863.
Jack, E., Powers, T. and Skinner, L. (2010), “Reverse logistics capabilities: antecedents and cost
savings”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 40
No. 3, pp. 228-246.
CR Jaffe, A., Peterson, S., Portney, P. and Stavins, R. (1995), “Environmental regulation and the
competitiveness of US manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us?”, Journal of Economic
26,3 Literature, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 132-163.
Kleindorfer, P.R., Singhal, K. and van Wassenhove, L.N. (2005), “Sustainable operations
management”, Production & Operations Management, Vol. 14, pp. 482-492.
Lin, B., Jones, C.A. and Hsieh, C. (2001), “Environmental practices and assessment: a process
244 perspective”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 101 No. 2, pp. 71-79.
Lin, C. and Ho, Y. (2010), “The influence of environmental uncertainty on corporate green
behaviour: an empirical study with small and medium –size enterprises”, Social Behaviour
and Personality, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 691-696.
Linton, J. and Jayaraman, V. (2005), “A conceptual framework for product life extension”,
International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 43 No. 9, pp. 1807-1829.
McGuire, J., Sungren, A. and Schneeweis, T. (1998), “Corporate social responsibility and firm
performance”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 854-872.

Malhotra, N. and Briks, D. (2006), Marketing Research: An Applied Approach, Prentice Hall,
Harlow.
Miles, M. and Covin, J. (2000), “Environmental marketing: a source of reputational, competitive
and financial advantage”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 299-311.
Moneva, J. and Ortas, E. (2010), “Corporate environmental and financial performance: a
multivariate approach”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 110 No. 2,
pp. 193-210.
Narasimhan, R. and Carter, J.R. (1998), “Environmental supply chain management”, Research
Monograph, The Center for Advanced Purchasing Studies, AZ State University, Tempe,
AZ, available at: www.capsresearch.org (accessed 11January 2011).
Naveh, E. and Marcus, A. (2004), “What does ISO 9000 quality assurance standard lead to
performance improvement”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 51
No. 3, pp. 352-363.
Olugu, E., Wong, K. and Shaharoun, A. (2011), “Development of key performance measures for the
automobile green supply chain”, Resources Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 55 No. 6,
pp. 567-579.
Rettab, B. and Ben Brik, A. (2008), “Green supply chain in Dubai. Dubai”, available at: www.
dubaichamber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/GREEN-SUPPLY-CHAIN-IN-DUBAI.
pdf/ (accessed 12 April 2012).
Rivera, J. (2002), “Assessing a voluntary environmental initiative in the developing world: the
Costa Rican certification of sustainable tourism”, Policy Sciences, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 333-360.
Rockness, J., Schalter, P. and Rockness, H. (1986), “Hazardous waste disposal, corporate
disclosure, and financial performance in the chemical industry in M. Neimark (ED)”,
Advances in Public Interest Accounting, Vol. 1, pp. 167-219.
Rogelberg, S.G. and Stanton, J.M. (2007), “Introduction: understanding and dealing with
organizational survey nonresponse”, Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 10 No. 2,
pp. 195-209.
Rogers, D. and Lambke, R. (1999), Going Backwards: Reverse Logistics Trends and Practices,
Reverse Logistics Executive Council Press, Pittsburg, PA.
Rothenberg, S., Pil, F. and Maxwell, J. (2001), “Lean, green, and the quest for environmental
performance”, Production and Operations Management, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 228-243.
Russo, M. (2009), “Explaining the impact of ISO 14001 on emission performance: a dynamic
capabilities perspective on process and learning”, Business Strategy and the Environment,
Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 307-319.
Russo, M. and Fouts, P. (1997), “A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental Green supply
performance and profitability”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40 No. 3,
pp. 534-559. chain
Sarkis, J., Helms, M. and Hervani, A. (2010), “Reverse logistics and social sustainability”, management
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 17 No. 6,
pp. 337-354.
Sekaran, U. (2003), Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, Wiley, Singapore.
Stapleton, P., Glove, M. and Davis, S. (2001), Environmental Management Systems: An
245
Implementation Guide For Small And Medium Sized Organizations, 2nd ed., NSF
International, Ann Arbor, MI.
Stead, E. and Stead, G. (1995), “An empirical investigation of sustainability strategy
implementation in industrial organizations”, Research in Corporate Social Performance
and Policy, Vol. 1 No. S1, pp. 43-66.
Testa, F. and Iraldo, F. (2010), “Shadows and lights of GSCM: determinants and effects of these
practices based on a multinational study”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 18 No. 11,
pp. 953-962.
Theyel, G. (2001), “Customer and supplier relation for environmental performance”, Greener
Management International, Vol. 35, pp. 61-69.
Tibor, T. and Feldman, I. (1996), ISO 14000: A Guide to the New Environmental Management
Standards, Irwin Professional, Burr Ridge, IL.
Torielli, R.M., Abrahams, R.M., Smillie, R.W. and Voigt, R.C. (2011), “Using lean methodologies for
economically and environmentally sustainable foundries”, China Foundry, Vol. 8 No. 1,
pp. 74-88.
Van Hoek, R. (1999), “From reversed logistics to green supply chains”, Supply Chain Management,
Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 129-135.
Vogi, W. (2007), Quantitative Research Methods for Professionals, Pearson Education, Boston, MA.
Wagner, M. (2005), “How to reconcile environmental and economic performance to improve
corporate sustainability: corporate environmental strategies in the European paper
industry”, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 76 No. 2, pp. 105-118.
Waltson, S., Handfield, R. and Melnyk, S. (1998), “The green supply chain: integrating suppliers
into environmental management process”, International Journal of Purchasing and
Material Management, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 2-11.
Wiseman, J. (1982), “An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual
reports”, Accounting, Organization and Society, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 53-63.
Zhu, Q. and Sarkis, J. (2007), “The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green
supply chain practices and performance”, International Journal of Production Research,
Vol. 45 No. 18, pp. 4333-4355.
Corresponding author
Balan Sundarakani can be contacted at: balansundarakani@uowdubai.ac.ae
For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website:
www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm
Or contact us for further details: permissions@emeraldinsight.com
View publication stats

2016 - Emerald - Younis, Sundarakani, Vel - CR-04-2015-0024

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

2016 - Emerald - Younis, Sundarakani, Vel - CR-04-2015-0024

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2016 - Emerald - Younis, Sundarakani, Vel - CR-04-2015-0024

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

The impact of implementing green supply chain management practices on

Hassan Younis Balan Sundarakani

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Organizational learning within supply-chain networks View project

Industry 4.0 Project View project

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Downloaded on: 09 July 2016, At: 03:10 (PT)

2.1 Green supply chain management and corporate performance: no relationship

2.6 Control variables

3. Research framework and hypotheses

3.1 Green supply chain management practices and environmental performance

3.2 Green supply chain management practices and operational performance

3.3 Green supply chain management practices and economic performance

cooperation practices and corporate economic performance when external

3.4 Green supply chain management practices and social performance

4.2 Population and sample selection

4.3 Details of the instrument and survey

Require suppliers to use environmental packaging

Improved its chances in successfully selling its products

4.5 Responding firms’ characteristics

4.6 Validity and reliability

Ras Al Khaima 7 6.0

4.8 Descriptive statistics of dependent variables

4.9 Factor analysis

Variable No. of items Cronbach’s ␣

Variable No. of items Minimum Maximum Mean SD

Eco-design 4 1 5 3.76 1.34

4.10 Multiple regression analysis

Variable No. of items Minimum Maximum Mean SD

Environmental performance 6 1 5 3.75 1.04

GSCM practices and Bartlett’s Factor Variance

green supply chain

Research hypothesis ␤ Status

1a ED ⬎ EP 0.139 Not supported Table VII.

Research hypothesis ␤ Status

2a ED ⬎ OP ⫺0.11 Not supported

Research hypothesis ␤ Status

3a ED ⬎ EcP ⫺0.156 Not supported

Research hypothesis ␤ Status

4a ED ⬎ SP 0.012 Not supported

Marketing Research, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 396-402.

meta-analysis”, Organization Studies, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 403-441.

implementation by Chinese manufacturers”, Journal of Environmental Management,

performance”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 854-872.

View publication stats

You might also like