I Some Tries
I Some Tries
I Some Tries
Proof. Let A, B and C be three collinear points, and their image be A0 , B 0 and C 0 .
= B 0 C 0 and AB ∼
= A0 C 0 , BC ∼
Assume, that A0 B 0 C 0 form a triangle. But AC ∼ = A0 B 0 ⇒
|AC| + |BC| = |AB| = |A0 B 0 | < |A0 C 0 | + |B 0 C 0 |. ⇒⇐
Theorem 1.4 If, an isometry has two fix points, then the determined line is also fixed
point-by-point (axis).
Proof. Let A = A0 and B = B 0 be true and P be a point on this line. Then P 0 must be
also on the line and AP ∼
= AP 0 ∧ BP ∼
= BP 0 ⇒ P = P 0 .
Theorem 1.5 If, an isometry has three fix points, then the determined plane is also fixed
point-by-point (plane).
B
Definition 1.6 The reflection of the plane in a line
t assign the P 0 point to P if P P 0 ⊥t and P T ∼
= P 0T , A
0
where T = P P ∩ t.
1
Theorem 1.9 If, a non-identical isometry has exactly two fix points, then it is a reflection
in the determined line.
Proof. Let A and B be the fix points and P be an arbitrary point. Then AP ∼
= AP 0 ∧
BP ∼
= BP 0 ⇒ P = P 0 , or AB is the perpendicular bisector of P P 0 ⇒ d(P, AB) =
d(P 0 , AB) and P P 0 ⊥AB.
Theorem 1.10 If, a non-identical R isometry has exactly one fix point, then it is the
composition of two reflections, through this fix point.
Theorem 1.11 If, a non-identical isometry T has no fix point, then it is the composition
of either two or three reflections.
Proof. Let P be an arbitrary point and P 0 be its image. Then T ◦ t1 has either one, or
two fix points, where t1 is the reflection to the perpendicular bisector of P P 0 .
1. T ◦ t1 = R = t2 ◦ t3 ⇒ T = t2 ◦ t3 ◦ t−1
1 = t2 ◦ t3 ◦ t1
2. T ◦ t1 = t2 ⇒ T = t2 ◦ t−1
1 = t2 ◦ t1
Theorem 1.12 Any isometry of the plane is the composition of at most three reflections
in a line.
Proof. It follows from the above theorems trivially, since any isometry has either 0, 1, or
2 fix points or all the points on the plane is fixed point-by-point.
Lemma 1.13 The composition of two reflections can be considered as either a rotation
(intersecting axis) or a translation (parallel axis).
Proof.
– Intersecting axis: Let A be the intersection of the two lines t1 and t2 . Then P At1 ∠ ∼ =
P 0 At1 ∠ and P 0 At2 ∠ ∼
= P 00 At2 ∠, therefore P AP 00 ∠ = 2t1 t2 ∠ = 2α ⇒ Rotation around A
by 2α.
– Parallel axis: Now, we can say that d(P, t1 ) = d(P 0 , t1 ) and d(P 0 , t2 ) = d(P 00 , t2 )
and P, P 0 , P 00 are collinear points, therefore d(P, P 00 ) = d(t1 , t2 ) = 2d ⇒ Translation,
perpendicular to ti with 2d.
Remark 1.14 In the case of the rotation, only the angle of the lines matters, in the case
of the translation, only the distance and the direction matters.
2
Theorem 1.15 Every isometry of the Euclidean plane belongs to one of the following 5
groups:
(a) t1 ∩ t2 = t2 ∩ t3
Then we can consider the t2 ◦ t3 as a rotation
around this point, and we can rotate the lines
around this center to get t1 = t02 . Then t1 ◦ t2 ◦
t3 = t1 ◦ t02 ◦ t03 = t1 ◦ t−1 0 0
1 ◦ t3 = t3 . Figure 1.2: Case 1. (a)
t3 ,
t2
(b) t1 ∩ t2 6= t2 ∩ t3 t2
t3 t1
First, we rotate t1 and t2 around their intersec- K ,
t1
tion O until t02 ⊥t3 . Then we rotate t02 and t3 O
O
around their intersection K until t002 k t01 . Then
,,
t3
t01 ◦ t002 is a translation and t01 ◦ t002 ◦ t03 is a glide
reflection.
,,
K t2
,
2. case t1 ∩ t2 = ∅ ⇒ t1 k t2 t1
(b) t1 k t2 ∦ t3
,,
t2
First, we rotate t2 and t3 around their intersec-
tion until t02 ⊥t1 . Then we rotate t1 and t02 around ,
t3
their intersection until t01 k t03 . Finally, we rotate ,,
t1
t002
and t03 around their intersection, until t01 k t000
2.
Then t01 ◦ t000 00
2 ◦ t3 is a glide reflection. Figure 1.4: Case 2. (b)
Remark 1.16 Two reflections are commutative to each other if their axis are orthogonal
to each other.
3
1.2 Isometries of the Euclidean space
Theorem 1.17 Any isometry of the space is the composition of at most four reflections
in a plane.
Theorem 1.18 Every isometry of the Euclidean space belongs to one of the following 7
groups:
where
5. Glide reflection: composition of a translation and a reflection
Definition 1.19 The reflection in a line in the space means a rotation around this line
by 180◦ . This can be represented as a reflection in two orthogonal planes through the line.
Lemma 1.20 The composition of two reflections in a line is either rotation or translation
or screw displacement, if the two lines are intersecting, parallel or skew lines.
,,,,,
Proof. P
,
Assume that e = t1 ◦ t2 , f = t3 ◦ t4 . P P
,,,,
,,
1. case: The lines e and f determine a plan P
e f
We choose the positions of ti such that, t2 and t3 coin- e
f
cide the determined plane and t1 and t4 are orthogonal
,,,
to it. Then t2 ◦ t3 is identity and if e k f , then t1 k t4 , P
4
Lemma 1.21 The composition of two translations is also translation.
Lemma 1.22 The composition of two rotations with orthogonal axis is a screw displace-
ment.
,,
to this orthogonal plane ⇒ using the planar case, P
5
3. case: If, plane 1 and 2 are parallel to each other, then plane 3 is either parallel
them both ⇒ reflection, or plane 3 intersects them in parallel lines. Then the plane,
orthogonal to the lines will be orthogonal to all the planes ⇒ 1. case
4. We can assume, that the composition of the first
3 reflections is either glide reflection or improper
1 2 1
rotation. 1 2 2
If, plane 4 is parallel to the third plane of an im-
3
proper rotation, then it is a screw displacement 3 3
by definition.
4
If, m is the intersection of plane 3 and 4, then 4 4