Journal of Primary Education: Tunggu Ica Giwanti, Andreas Priyono Budi Prasetyo & Eva Banowati
Journal of Primary Education: Tunggu Ica Giwanti, Andreas Priyono Budi Prasetyo & Eva Banowati
Journal of Primary Education: Tunggu Ica Giwanti, Andreas Priyono Budi Prasetyo & Eva Banowati
https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/article/view/34897
Tunggu Ica Giwanti1, Andreas Priyono Budi Prasetyo2 & Eva Banowati3
1
Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, Semarang, Indonesia
2
Biology Education, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
3
Geography, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Correspondence address: p-ISSN 2252-6404
Kaligawe Raya KM. 4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk,
e-ISSN 2502-4515
Semarang, Jawa Tengah, 50112
E-mail: tungguica@gmail.com
242
Tunggu Ica Giwanti, Andreas Priyono Budi Prasetyo & Eva Banowati
Journal of Primary Education 10 (3) (2021) : 242 – 247
243
Tunggu Ica Giwanti, Andreas Priyono Budi Prasetyo & Eva Banowati
Journal of Primary Education 10 (3) (2021) : 242 – 247
model to the ability of scientific literacy and sample t-test and an increase in the ability to solve
student learning outcomes. mathematical problem solving in the N-Gain test.
The research method used in this research The results of this study are used to analyze
is quantitative research. The design used is a the effectiveness of the Project Based Learning
sequential explanatory design with a non model for the ability of scientific literacy and
equivalent control group design (Sugiyono, student learning outcomes in sciences learning.
2015).
This research was conducted at SDN Science Literacy Ability
UPTD Jepara, Central Java. The population in Before conducted a hypothesis test to
this study were all fifth grade students at SDN determine the effectiveness of the Project Based
UPTD Jepara, while the sample in this study Learning model on the ability of students'
were fifth grade students at SDN Jambu 4 as an scientific literacy, the prerequisite test is
experimental group and fifth grade students at normality test and homogeneity test to determine
SDN 3 Sobrong as a control group. The sampling the distribution of research data.
of this research used the purpose random Normality test aimed to determine the
sampling technique. post-test data on the scientific literacy ability of
The data of this study are the results of students from the experimental class and the
scientific literacy skills and student learning control class with normal distribution or not. The
outcomes. The data obtained were analyzed normality test results of students' scientific
quantitatively. Quantitative data analysis in this literacy abilities were presented in Table 1.
study is a comparative test using independent
Based on Table 1 the normality of the Homogeneity test aimed to determine the
experimental class and the control class are more post-test data from the experimental class and the
than α (sig. > 0.05) so that it can be concluded control class have the same variance or not. The
that the scientific literacy ability of students is results of the normality and homogeneity tests
normally distributed. were presented in Table 2.
Based on Table 2, the homogeneity test scientific literacy ability of students in the
results of the experimental class and the control experimental class is better than the control class.
class are more than the α value (sig. > 0.05) so The results of the N-Gain analysis showed that
that it can be concluded that the students' the scientific literacy ability of the experimental
scientific literacy ability data has the same class students was 0.61 and included in the
variance or the data is declared homogeneous. medium criteria.
The results of t-test analysis obtained Comparison of the average increase in the
tvalue = 3.559 > ttable = 2.479 at 95% confidence pre-test and post-test results of students' scientific
level, so it can be concluded that the average
244
Tunggu Ica Giwanti, Andreas Priyono Budi Prasetyo & Eva Banowati
Journal of Primary Education 10 (3) (2021) : 242 – 247
literacy skills between the experimental and literacy is not just knowing, but far from it is how
control classes can be seen in Figure 1. they undrastand to apply the science to
conditions in their surrounding environment
90 79 (how they know and apply in daily life not what
80
70
70
they know).
Average Value
60 50 49
Hapsari (2016) explained that the learning
50 process that runs dynamically and openly from
40
30 various directions can improve students' scientific
20 literacy abilities. The application of the Project
10 Based Learning model that is applied is very
0
Pretest Posttest effective in improving students' literacy abilities.
Science Literacy Ability This is evidenced by the enthusiasm of students
Experimentation Class Control class in participating in learning shows that the Project
Figure 1. Results of Increased Science Literacy Based Learning learning model can make
Ability students active in learning.
245
Tunggu Ica Giwanti, Andreas Priyono Budi Prasetyo & Eva Banowati
Journal of Primary Education 10 (3) (2021) : 242 – 247
Based on Table 3, the normality test results Homogeneity test aimed to determine the
of the experimental class and the control class are post-test data from the experimental class and the
more than the α value (sig. > 0.05) so that it can control class have the same variance or not. The
be concluded that the student learning outcomes results of the normality and homogeneity tests are
data are normally distributed. presented in Table 4.
Based on Table 4, the homogeneity test Based on Figure 4, the increase in student
results of the experimental class and the control learning outcomes can be seen from the
class are more than the α value (sig. > 0.05) so it difference in the pre-test and post-test. In
can be concluded that the data have the same or addition, it appears that the results of an increase
homogeneous variance. in class using the Project Based Learning model
The results of the t-test analysis obtained are better than the results of an increase in class
tvalue = 3.848 > ttable = 2.479 at 95% confidence using the expository model.
level, so it can be concluded that the average Based on data analysis the results of the
student learning outcomes in the experimental study indicate that the Project Based Learning
class are better than the control class. model is very effective in improving student
The results of the N-Gain analysis showed learning outcomes in the cognitive realm in
that the learning outcomes of the experimental natural science learning. The increase in student
class students were 0.64 and included in the learning outcomes is due to the Project Based
medium criteria. Comparison of the increase in Learning model providing broad space for
the average pre-test and post-test student learning students so that they are active during the
outcomes can be seen in Figure 3. learning process.
The learning process with the Project
90 85 Based Learning model begins with the
80 75
submission of fundamental questions and ends
70 61 61
with a project created by the students themselves.
Average Value
60
50 The steps during the learning process take place
40 triggering students' creativity in thinking to
30 produce something tangible, increasing self-
20 management, awareness of attitudes in
10
themselves, and habits to evaluate themselves.
0
Pretest Posttest
Learning outcomes CONCLUSION
Experimentation Class Control Class
Figure 4. Student Learning Outcomes Based on the results and discussion, it can
be concluded that learning using the Project
Based Learning model is very effective in
246
Tunggu Ica Giwanti, Andreas Priyono Budi Prasetyo & Eva Banowati
Journal of Primary Education 10 (3) (2021) : 242 – 247
improving the ability of scientific literacy and Mahardika, E.A.S., Suwono, N., & Indriwati, S.E.
student learning outcomes. 2016. Eksplorasi Kemampuan Awal Literasi
Biologi Peserta Didik Kelas X SMAN 7
Malang. Prosiding. Seminar Nasional
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Pendidikan Biologi dan Sainstek(SNPBS
2016). Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
The author would like to thank for the Surakarta, 21 Mei 2016.
principals, teachers and students of class V Malawati, R., & Sahyar. 2016. Peningkatan
SDN Jambu 4 dan SDN 3 Srobrong. Keterampilan Proses Sains Mahasiswa dengan
Model Project Based Learning Berbasis
Pelatihan dalam Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal
REFERENCES
Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 5(1), 58-63
Piliang, M. F., Hasruddin., & Manurung, B. 2015.
Arianto, I.S., Subali, B., & Linuwih, S. 2018.
Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis
Penerapan Model Project Based Learning
Proyek dalam Tatanan Group Investigation
untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa
pada Matakuliah Ekologi Hewan terhadap
SMPN 1 Ngawen. Indonesia Journal of Natural
Keterampilan Proses Sains Mahasiswa Usi
Science Education, 1(2), 120-130.
Pematangsiantar. Jurnal Tabularasa PPS
Afriana, J., Permanasari, A., & Fitriani, A. 2016.
Unimed, 12(1), 12-22
Penerapan Project Based Learning Terintegrasi
Ramadhany, A., Purnomo, A., & Suryadi, A. 2016.
STEM Untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains
Pengaruh Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran
Siswa Ditinjau Dari Gender. Jurnal Inovasi
Project Based Learning Pada Pembelajaran
Pendidikan IPA, 2(2), 202-112.
Sejarah Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas XI
Elvina, Subyantoro, & Haryadi. 2015. Perbedaan
IPS MAN Temanggung. Indonesian Journal of
Peningkatan Keterampilan Menulis Puisi
History Education, 4(2), 14-20.
Dengan Model Sinektik dan Project Based
Rusilowati, A., Sunyoto, E.N., & Susilowati, S.M.E.
Learning Berdasarkan Tipe Kepribadian
2015. Developing of Science Tectbook Based
Peserta Didik Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Journal of
on Scientific Literacy for Grade of Secondary
Primary Education, 4(2), 66-73.
School. Journal: International Conference on
Fitri, H., Dasna, I.W., & Suharjo. 2018. Pengaruh
Mathematics, Science, and Education(ICMSE),
Model Project Based Learning(PjBL) Terhadap
12(2), 98-105.
Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Ditinjau
Rusilowati, A & Basam, F. 2015. The Profile of
dari Motivasi Berprestasi Siswa Kelas IV
Scientific Literacy Skills Junior High School
Sekolah Dasar. Briliant: Jurnal Riset dan
Students in Soppeng South Celebes.
Konseptual, 3(2), 201-212.
Proceedings: The 3rd International Seminar on
Hapsari. 2016. Pengaruh Pembelajaran Berbasis
Education and Technology(ISET 2017).
Proyek Berbantuan Modul Daur Ulang
Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Limbah Pada Literasi Sains. Journal of Biology
Semarang, 24 Mei 2017.
Education,5(3), 112-116.
Rusilowati, A. Kurniawati, L. Nugroho, E.S., &
Husamah. 2015. Blended Project Based Learning:
Widiyatmoko, A. 2016. Developing an
Metacognitive Awareness of Biologi Education
Instrument of Scientific Literacy Asessment on
New Student. Journal of Education and Learning,
the Cycle Theme. International Journal of
9(4), 274-281.
Environmental & Science Education, 11(12), 5718-
Kizkapan, O & Berkas, O. 2017. The Effect of Project
5727.
Based Learning on Seventh Grade Students’
Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Kombinasi(Mixed
Academic Achievement. International Journal of
Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Instruction, 10(1), 37-54.
Sumaryatun, Rusilowati, A., & Nugroho, S. E. 2016.
Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Autentik
Kurikulum 2013 Berbasis Literasi Sains Pada
Materi Bioteknologi. Journal of Primary
Education, 5(1), 66-73.
247