Real Estate Development Analysis
Real Estate Development Analysis
Real Estate Development Analysis
Analysis
Copyright, July 14, 2006
PRODUCED BY:
JLerner + Associates
PUBLISHED BY:
Economic Development Association of BC
This manual has been provided, courtesy of the Economic Development Association of British
Columbia. This material may not be copied or otherwise reproduced in any form, by any means
(electronic, photocopying, recording or otherwise) in whole or in part, without the expressed, prior,
written permission of the publisher.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: The author and publisher have used their best efforts in
preparing this workbook. They make no representation or warranties with respect to the accuracy
or completeness of this material and specifically disclaim any implied warranties or merchantability
or fitness for any particular purpose and shall in no event be liable for any loss of profit or any
other commercial damage including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential or other
damages.
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................5
PRE-DEVELOPMENT PLANNING............................................................9
APPENDIX F - BIBLIOGRAPHY..............................................................40
Real Estate Development
Analysis
The purpose of this section is to provide an overview of principles and
tools to assist the community economic development practitioner in
analyzing and promoting real estate development. Much of the discussion
revolves around public sector involvement in real estate development but
many of the principles and tools are borrowed from the private sector and
thus transferable between both worlds.
The term “real estate development” will be used to mean green field
development (development of raw land), redevelopment or revitalization
(refurbishing or demolishing and rebuilding), brownfield development
(reclaiming polluted land for development) and/or the major refurbishment
of municipal utilities and transportation systems (as is typical of a public-
private franchise arrangements).
Highest and Best Use Analysis
It is not uncommon for an Economic Development or a public official to be
confronted with decisions about what to do with “surplus” or under-utilized
public land. They might ask themselves:
Deciding what the best use of a property is can involve many factors,
especially when public property is involved. These include:
• Market demand;
• Financial viability;
• Legal permissibility;
• Administrative and political acceptability;
• Tax maximization or minimization;
• Physical possibility;
• Economic diversification benefits; and,
• Employment creation potential.
1) Physically possibility;
2) Legally permissibility;
3) Financially feasibility; and,
4) Maximal productivity.
Typically these indicators are tested against the property as if it was vacant
first, even if improvements are present, since an existing building may not be
the best use of the property. If the existing use of the land is seen to be
highest and best use, then existing improvements (buildings or structures)
can be analyzed as well to determine if they should be renovated in some
way, using the same indicators. If the existing use of the land is not the
highest and best use, the methodology will help you establish what is.
Physically Possible
The first test of highest and best use is to determine if the development
concept is physically possible. In this test we are determining what the
physical characteristics of the site are and how they might affect its highest
and best use. The size, shape, terrain, drainage and accessibility of the
land, the presence of potentially toxic materials, current authorized or
unauthorized uses, noise, fumes, local traffic flows and the risk of natural
disasters affect uses to which land can be put. The capacity and availability
of public utilities are also important considerations as are subsoil and
topographical conditions. All of these characteristics need to be considered
when considering a proposed land use. 1
Legal Permissibility
The second test in highest and best use analysis is to determine the legal
permissibility of the land use concept. In this test, we are determining
what legal or policy constraints might limit or preclude use of a particular
site. Some common constraints include: existing deeds and long-term
leases, zoning bylaws, building codes, historic controls, and environmental
regulations. Public reaction from neighbouring users, or the general
public (NIMBY resistance), can also pressure public officials into limiting
certain developments. The developer needs to consider all of these legal or
policy restrictions or the cost of changing them to determine if a particular
range of uses are probable. 2
Financial Feasibility
If the proposed new uses are physically possible and legally permissible, it is
necessary to next determine if they are financially feasible. If the uses are
income-producing, the financial analysis will likely focus on which potential
uses produce an income equal to or greater than the amount needed to
satisfy operating expenses, financial obligations and capital amortization
of the investment. If the uses are not income producing, the analysis will
determine which uses are likely to create a value or result in a profit equal
to or greater than the amount needed to develop and market the property
under those uses. To determine the financial feasibility of a use that will not
generate income, the developer compares the value of benefits that accrue
from the use against the expenses involved. If the value benefits exceed
1 Dybvig, Larry, ed. “Highest and Best Use Analysis.” Appraisal of Real Estate. Second Canadian Edition.
Vancouver: Sauder School of Business, UBC, 2005., p 12.7
2 Ibid. p 12.5-12.6
Maximum Productivity
If the proposed uses of the property are financially feasible, the final
test is to determine which use produces the highest residual land
value or, in layman’s terms, which use produces the highest land value
after development costs are subtracted (the cost of labour, capital and
entrepreneurial coordination). In some cases, the highest and best use of
a property may not be its existing use but the costs of demolishing the
building and constructing another are prohibitive. In this case, the existing
use may be considered an interim use until the markets warrant new
investment costs.
If the highest and best use of the property is the existing use but some
modifications are required, these modifications can be compared to
determine which one has the highest rate of return. Once the developers
have applied the highest and best use criteria to a property, they can
proceed with a good rationale for development to a funder, lender or
partner confident that their choice(s) are well thought out. 4
However, it should be noted that certain parcels of land can only achieve
their highest and best use as part of an assemblage. In such a case, the
developer must determine the feasibility and probability of assembly. This
may be the case where individual tracts of land may not have the same
potential for development as a large parcel might have. In this case, a
process of assembling contiguous land should be explored (see Appendix 2
for a discussion on the land assembly process). However, that assemblage
of a tract of land will often demand a higher than market prices, especially
properties acquired near the end of the assemblage process, because the
sellers may know that the supply of contiguous land is limited. 5
3 Ibid. p 12.8 .
4 Ibid. p 12.8.
5 Ibid. p 12.9
Pre-Development Planning
A real estate development project usually starts with an idea, which may be
based on intuition, a perceived need or an expressed market demand. In
the case of community development this might include the development or
expansion of an existing industrial park, a commercial district, a recreational
facility, a resort, a residential development or the development or upgrade
of a public utility. The developer may be a local government, an economic
development corporation or a private company or partnered with a local
government (public-private partnership).
Quick Analysis
1) Organizational Alignment
2) Site Analysis
3) Market Analysis
4) Quick Financial Feasibility
Detailed Analysis/Work
5) Cultivate Political/Public Support/Vision
6) Identify Development Team
7) Due Diligence
a. Physical Inspection
b. Detailed Market Analysis
c. Planning and Zoning Investigation
d. Detailed Financial Analysis
e. Verify Financing
f. Survey, Legal Description and Title Check 6
6 Note:Throughout the discussion process, there are references to various data needs. Where common sources for
the data are known, they are referred to in relevant footnotes.
Also, please see Appendix 1 for a checklist of pre-development steps for quick reference.
If the answers are yes, the developer can move on to a quick market analysis
to determine if there is demand for the proposed concept. If the answer to
any of these questions is no, then the developer should probably reconsider
the idea or perhaps consider delegating it to some other development
entity. It is not uncommon these days for municipalities to enter into a
private public partnership (P3) to develop many projects. In this case, the
municipality still needs to do pre-development planning but implementation
of the project is eventually handed off to a private partner (see section 4
for more discussion on private-public partnerships).
If the market analysis is for a more typical real estate development project,
“economic base” information 7 will usually give one a good indication of
market demand. This information usually includes:
7 Ibid. p 11.10 .
These indicators will give you an overall picture of the health of the
economy and its momentum. 8 If these indicators are positive and strong,
that is a good sign that demand may be strong.
Site Analysis
If a preliminary market analysis seems to indicate that demand is healthy
and perhaps exceeding supply, the next step is to undertake a preliminary
site analysis to ensure that your project can be efficiently and economically
developed. A preliminary site analysis generally involves the following steps:
A. Canvas for sites;
B. Determine Ownership information;
C. Assess Physical Conditions; and,
D. Determine the Cost of Acquisition. 10
A detailed site analysis may also be required later in the feasibility analysis.
It is more complex and generally needs to be carried out by an architect or
engineer.
8 BCStats or StatsCan publish information on these indicators on their websites, although they can be dated or
limited to larger regions. Alternatively, local population growth can be derived from changes in local property tax
filer’s numbers. Business and employment growth can also be gauged by announcements in local papers regarding
new business formations.
9 Canada Housing and Mortgage Corporation publishes annual vacancy rates for apartments in population
centres with 10,000 more people. PriceWaterhouseCoopers also publishes condo rental vacancies for the large
centres in BC. Alternatively, talking to a local real estate agent who handles rentals, perusing the classified ads or
driving by some of the larger rental facilities in your market area may give you a more up to date and specific idea
of your market.
10 Jensen, Jack ed., ROI On-line Real Estate Development Manual, 7 July 2005.Rural Opportunities Inc., p. 11.
<www.ruralinc.org/English/Programs/development_manual.htm>
Though it is not necessary at this stage, ultimately, you will want to conduct
a title or deed search to verify ownership and to determine if there are
any other special rights associated with the property (e.g. mineral, water,
or air rights) as well as any easements or private restrictions to the use of
the property. The land title information should also include information
regarding mortgages or liens held against the property. This information can
be obtained directly through a BC Land Title and Survey office or indirectly
through a local Government Agent’s office, a notary or lawyer’s office.
11 The Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) is a provincial zone in which agriculture is recognized as the priority use.
Farming is encouraged and non-agricultural uses are controlled. The Agricultural Land Commission Act sets the
legislative framework for the establishment and administration of the agricultural land preservation program.
12 Local governments also occasionally market foreclosure properties and provincial and federal governments
occasionally market surplus lands, through land marketing corporations (e.g. Land and Water BC or Canada Lands
Corp).
13 Jensen, Jack ed., ROI On-line Real Estate Development Manual, 7 July 2005. Rural Opportunities Inc., p. 11.
www.ruralinc.org/English/Programs/development_manual.htm
14 Ibid.
It is a good idea at this point to record this information and take pictures
or draw an approximate plot plan of the site for future reference. Once
this information is assembled, the developer needs to ask himself if these
characteristics are consistent with the general physical needs of the
development concept. If they are not consistent, then a new site needs to
be identified.
If the price of the potential project site is completely out of line with
the market, there is no point in spending further time in researching the
property. If however, the price is relatively consistent with similar property
prices, then the developer should move next to obtain a legal or accurate
map of the property and undertake a quick financial analysis. 16
15 Dybvig, Larry, ed. “Highest and Best Use Analysis.” Appraisal of Real Estate. Second Canadian Edition.
Vancouver: Sauder School of Business, UBC, 2005., p 9.7 .
16 Jensen, Jack ed., ROI On-line Real Estate Development Manual, 7 July 2005.Rural Opportunities Inc., p. 11.
<www.ruralinc.org/English/Programs/development_manual.htm>
If the initial estimates result in a positive cash flow, the development may
be economically viable. At this point, the project has reached a stage of
“go or no go”. Also, at this stage the developer has a sense of whether the
development concept might be successful.
If the project does look promising and the developer is serious about the
project, the next steps to consider is either taking an option 21 on the
property or making an offer to purchase the property. If the property is
public property, this is obviously not necessary.
17 Ibid.
18 This figure can be obtained by calling up one or two contractors in the area to get estimates. You will need
to know the approximate square footage and have a general idea what type of building and amenities you want,
including roads, parking lots, and utilities.
19 Financing costs can be done fairly quickly once an acceptable down payment is finalized. A bank or a
mortgage company will usually give you an estimate over the phone or online calculators are available to do a basic
estimate.
20 Vacancy rates can be determined by talking to local property owners or reviewing historical statistics (if
available).
21 An option is simply an agreement with the owner to be given first right of refusal if another buyer comes along
and is usually secured with a small deposit.
After consulting with local officials, it is often wise to thank them for their
input. In the case of a political officials you may also want to ask them for a
letter of support, especially if you are seeking provincial or federal funding
for your development project.
22 Jensen, Jack ed., ROI On-line Real Estate Development Manual, 7 July 2005.Rural Opportunities Inc. p. 20.
<www.ruralinc.org/English/Programs/development_manual.htm>
23 The web address for the communications tool kit is at http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/inpupr-bdpr.nsf/en/
h_qz01558e.html
Physical Inspection
One of the key aspects of the project that first needs to be verified is the
physical integrity of the site and its improvements. A preliminary review of
this has presumably already taken place but now is the time for a thorough
site analysis. This may involve the assistance of professionals to inspect
the property and its improvements relative to building code, health code,
environmental regulations and to the physical needs of proposed project.
24 Jensen, Jack ed., ROI On-line Real Estate Development Manual, 7 July 2005.Rural Opportunities Inc., pp. 14-18.
<www.ruralinc.org/English/Programs/development_manual.htm>
Size and Shape Is the size and shape the land and buildings appropriate
to the use of the proposed use?
Market Analysis
A detailed market analysis can be as involved as the developer or his banker
desires but unless the developer is qualified, he will likely have to obtain a
specialist to undertake the work. Typically, the detailed market analysis is
meant to quantify or verify your first perceptions regarding market demand
and supply. It usually involves the following components:
A. Market Delineation
Market delineation is simply identifying or confirming the market area for
the proposed property development. The boundaries for a market area the
development is defined based on the following:
• Time-distance relationships – the commuting time to employment
centres and support facilities;
• Social or political boundaries – school districts, voting precincts,
trading area, demographic or economic characteristics, trade routes or
transportation interchanges;
• Man-made or natural boundaries - major thoroughfares, physical
boundaries; and,
• The location of competitive supply. 25
25 Dybvig, Larry, ed. “Highest and Best Use Analysis.” Appraisal of Real Estate. Second Canadian Edition.Vancouver:
Sauder School of Business, UBC, 2005., p.11.15 .
26 House and condo sale information is available through Realtylink.org on a monthly basis for the Lower Mainland
as well as on various regional Real Estate Board sites. Alternatively, discussions with you local realtor may provide
with up to date information. Household income by renter and owner can be accessed through Statistics Canada.
If existing properties are not already easily identifiable, local real estate
agent can probably help. Also, the municipal or district planning office or
building inspector can usually provide information on properties under
construction, with permits or being planned. 29
27 The BC Retailers Association publishes retail sales statistics on a provincial or subregional basis each month.
It is difficult to find statistics for smaller centres so it may be possible quantify demand based on population
threshold figures. An explanation as to how to apply these figures is located at
www. reddi.mah.gov.on.ca/userfiles/HTML/nts_6_20296_1.html#market under the title “Opportunity Identification
and Development Tools”. Alternately talk to local commercial real estate realtors.
28 These statistics are not reported but can be derived by aggregating clerical and management statistical classes
of BCSTATS workforce reports.These reports, however are often dated to the last census. HRDC produces the
workforce reports by subregion on a quarterly and annual basis but again clerical and management statistics
would need to be aggregated. Alternatively, the developer can monitor announcements in local papers regarding
new business formations.
29 Dybvig, Larry, ed. “Highest and Best Use Analysis.” Appraisal of Real Estate. Second Canadian Edition.
Vancouver: Sauder School of Business, UBC, 2005. pp. 11.17-11.27 .
D. Residual Analysis
Once existing and projected supply and demand are known, the developer
can determine how much room is left in the market place for additional
square footage, otherwise known as residual or marginal demand. 30
E. Capture Estimation
By comparing the productive attributes of the proposed development to
those of competitive properties, the developer can judge the market share
the proposed development is likely to capture given market conditions,
demand and competitive supply. A common method of estimating
capture rates is to identify the existing surplus or shortage and apply
historical absorption rates. There are also other methodologies that can be
research.31
Once this title search is completed, the developer can begin examining
zoning controls on the property. Zoning dictates the character and use
of land and buildings in a given area of the municipality or district. It also
controls the size of lots, types of structures allowed, building heights,
30 Dybvig, Larry, ed. “Highest and Best Use Analysis.” Appraisal of Real Estate. Second Canadian Edition.
Vancouver: Sauder School of Business, UBC, 2005. p. 11.15.
31 Ibid. pp. 11.17-11.27 .
32 The website for the BC Land Titles and Survey office is http://www.ltsa.ca/ltsa_services.htm
If a proposed development does not fit within the zoning regulations, the
developer has two choices:
Changing a project may entail minor or major alterations but if they are
major, the project may need to find a new site or attempt to gain a variance.
Variances are applied for by the developer or his agent and typically
require the applicant to undergo a public hearing process. The probability
of succeeding with a variance request often depends on how deviant the
project is from the prescribed land use and on how well prepared and
passionately the developer can make his case. Preparation for a variance
application can be quite costly at times and so a developer needs to weigh
the costs of proceeding with a variance against finding a new and perhaps
more compliant site. A good planner or architect should be able to advise
you as to how probable the success of a variance application will be. 34
33 Jensen, Jack ed., ROI On-line Real Estate Development Manual, 7 July 2005.Rural Opportunities Inc., p. 23.
www.ruralinc.org/English/Programs/development_manual.htm
34 Ibid. p. 24.
Project revenues are also important in the financial analysis, especially if the
project is an income-producing project. The developer will want to assess
the short-term and long-term revenue stream. If the project is a P3 the
partners will want to assess the revenues and costs over the lifecycle of the
contract.
Verify Financing
Financing of a development project can be simple or complicated depending
upon the risks of the project and the number and types of partners
involved.
Barring this there is always the private financing. If the project is a P3, this
may include direct financing or indirect financing. Direct financing involves
the developer going direct to the market for a loan. There are typically two
types of loans: including: construction or short-term loans and permanent
or long-term loans. Construction financing is the amount you will need
to borrow up to completion or prior to occupancy. This is usually a 6
months to 2-year loan, which is more expensive (higher interest rate) than a
permanent loan. The permanent loan is typically 2 to 25 years in length. 36
While it may be advisable to have one lender supply both the construction
and permanent financing, you may get a better deal by splitting the deal. The
developer should establish a relationship with several banks and see what
they offer. Public projects are often considered “low risk” if they are backed
by a municipality and therefore may be able to command “preferred” terms.
Survey of Property
In addition to a legal description and title check, many lenders will require a
recent survey of the subject property. If the seller has a recent survey, this
is addressed quite easily. If not, the lender may require an updated or re-
certified survey prior to closing the deal. The survey must be undertaken
by a licensed surveyor. 37
Once the property has been surveyed and financing secured and the
property deal is closed, the pre-development work is completed and the
development process begins!
36 Jensen, Jack ed., ROI On-line Real Estate Development Manual, 7 July 2005.Rural Opportunities Inc., p. 26.
<www.ruralinc.org/English/Programs/development_manual.htm>
37 Ibid., pp. 40.
There are, however also risks involved to the public entity with a private-
public partnership, including:
• Reduced control over design, delivery and operation;
• Reliance on a virtually unknown private entity;
• The deal structure may not be perceived to be fair or reasonable in
terms of cost sharing, risks and responsibilities or economic return;
• The private partner has the right to sell the project to an unknown
third party; and,
• The economic return on the project is primarily contingent on the
performance of the private partner. 39
38 Stainback, John. Public/Private Real Estate Partnerships,The Canadian Council for Public Private Partnerships:
The 10th Annual Conference on Public/Private Partnerships. 26 November 2002.p 10.
39 Ibid. p 12.
the Strategis website also lays out a fairly succinct process for pre-
development planning specific to public-private partnerships. It also provides
a number of tools to assist with communications and decision-making.
Needs Analysis:
1. Consult stakeholders and set objectives;
2. List constraints and assumptions;
3. Identify key success factors; and,
4. Develop a communications strategy (Communications Toolkit).
Project Definition:
1. Organize a project team and choose a project champion;
2. Establish a governance framework;
3. Develop a business case; and,
4. Prepare a public sector comparator (guide on preparing the PSC).
Concept Validation:
1. Consult stakeholders, revisit options and business case, and conduct
market sounding.
40 Strategis has an excellent document on developing a public sector comparator on its website. See http://
strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/inpupr-bdpr.nsf/en/h_qz01557e.html
41 Stainback, John. Public/Private Real Estate Partnerships,The Canadian Council for Public Private Partnerships:
The 10th Annual Conference on Public/Private Partnerships. 26 November 2002.p 16.
42 RFEI – Request for Expression of Interest, RFQ – Request for Qualifications, RFP – Request for Proposal.
43 Stainback, John. Public/Private Real Estate Partnerships,The Canadian Council for Public Private Partnerships:
The 10th Annual Conference on Public/Private Partnerships. 26 November 2002.p 17.
Once a pool of developers has been identified, a fair and open selection
process needs to be adopted and carried out. Best practices, normally
dictates that the process involves a Request for Qualifications and a
Request for Proposal. As well, many P3 experts recommend the use of a
Request for Expression of Interest at the outset, in order to stimulate the
formation of suitable consortia for the project. Based on pre-established
evaluation criteria, the RFQ then allows the proponent to qualify a shortlist
of bidders.
Once the bidding process is completed, the public proponent and the
private sector partner can begin to negotiate a partnership contract for
the project. This usually begins by revisiting the objectives of the project
and the pre-develop plans, which may or may not identify issues or
opportunities for improvement. The contract is usually negotiated based on
an interest-based approach, ensuring that interests and goals of both parties
are respected and ultimately reflected in the terms of the contract. 45
Whatever results from the negotiations the public sector proponent needs
to keep in mind:
• They need to match their project expectations with market realities;
• They should allow the private developer to be creative; and,
• They should share in any unforeseen risks, costs and responsibilities as
they arise.
44 http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/inpupr-bdpr.nsf/en/h_qz01561e.html#selectpartner
45 http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/inpupr-bdpr.nsf/en/h_qz01561e.html#selectpartner
46
Sierra Yoyo Desan Resource Road
Project Overview
The Sierra Yoyo Desan (SYD) Resource Road is a 180 km long route
running north east of Fort Nelson, providing primary access to over 27,000
square km of oil and gas exploration territory.
The road is used primarily by oil and gas, forestry and pipeline sector, and
prior to 1998, it consisted of various fragments, under the control of a
variety of owners. The roadbed had deteriorated under the stress of heavy
equipment, adverse weather conditions and insufficient maintenance, which
made it impassable.
46 www.partnershipsbc.ca
In 1998, the SYD Road was taken over by the BC Government who then
decided to upgrade the road to an all-season road to promote oil and
gas activity in the area. To do this it contracted out the upgrading and
maintenance of the road to a private partner. The Government conducted
a competitive selection process to design, construct, finance, operate and
maintain the SYD Road for a term of 16 years.
The road remains a public highway, owned by the Province and leased to
Ledcor for the term of the agreement.
Ledcor assumes the risks for: construction costs, design risk and
environmental permitting.
Project Benefits
The SYD Road project demonstrates a number of benefits for BC and, in
particular, Northeastern BC residents:
• An upgraded and maintained primary route into BC’s northeast oil and
gas fields at no direct cost to BC taxpayers
• Transference of project risks associated with construction, maintenance
and operation to a private partner
• Performance based compensation for improvements and maintenance
• Job creation and increased economic activity in the Northeast
• Free and open public access to the road
47 www.partnershipsbc.ca
The development and operation of the water treatment plant is part of the
Government’s strategy for environmental remediation of the abandoned
mine site. In 2004, EPCOR Water Services Inc. and its strategic partners
were selected from a competitive bidding process to design, build, finance
and operate for 20 years the Britannia plant.
Project Benefits
The partnership agreement between the Government of BC and EPCOR to
build and operate the Britannia Mine water treatment plant has resulted in a
lower cost facility that is providing clean water to the ecosystem.
• The project will cost the public sector approximately $27.2 million over
the 20 year contract period, which compares to the Province’s estimate
of $39.7 million had the project been built by government alone.
• Government will only begin performance payments once the plant is
producing clean water at regulated standards
• EPCOR will take the risk of incurring financial penalties if the plant does
not produce clean water in compliance with environmental regulations
48
Skyreach Place (now Prospero Place)
Public Partner – City of Kelowna
Private Partner – RG Properties Ltd.
Project Overview
Skyreach Place (now Prospero Place) is a sports and entertainment centre,
including an ice rink and award winning 6,000-seat concert venue. Prior
to the new venue the City was in need of a new arena to house its junior
hockey team and it lacked a large capacity concert centre to attract high
quality performances. Skyreach addressed both these needs.
48 Facts based on interview with Kelowna City official who managed Skyreach P3, April 2006.
The City attempted to find a partner two times to build, finance and
operate the new venue prior to settling with RG Properties. The deal
signed with RG Properties was a “trail breaking” agreement in 1997, since it
was developed before enactment of the Community Charter and therefore
involved overcoming considerable legal hurdles and red tape with the
Province of BC.
Project Benefits
• A new top quality sports and entertainment centre able to host a
junior hockey team and high quality performances.
• An alternative approach to project delivery avoided the need for a
referendum to approved borrowing.
• Legal liability and operational risks are transferred to the private sector
• Return on capital investment at year 30 (getting the land and building
back) reduces the long-term cost of capital.
• Increased entrepreneurial management maximizes business activity and
increases the financial viability of the project, particularly as it relates to
professionally promoted entertainment events, but also other areas of
operation.
• The relationship between the privately owned hockey club and the
facility is completely a private sector model, eliminating the risk of the
City subsidizing the hockey club.
• The total cost of capital and operations are less costly over a 30 period
than comparable publicly owned and operated facilities in Canada.
• Job creation and increased economic activity in the Kelowna area
The ALR covers approximately 4.7 million hectares. It includes private and
public lands that may be farmed, forested or vacant land. Some ALR blocks
cover thousands of hectares while others are small pockets of only a few
hectares.
The Agricultural Land Commission Act sets the legislative framework for
the establishment and administration of the agricultural land preservation
program. 49
Background
Leading up to the 1970’s prime agricultural land within an urban and
municipal setting was being converted to alternative uses at the direction of
local governments. The Provincial government responded to this conversion
of the agricultural land base by introducing BC’s Land Commission Act on
April 18, 1973. A Commission, appointed by the Provincial government,
established a special land use zone to ensure provincial interests superseded
local control over BC’s agricultural lands. This zone was called the
“Agricultural Land Reserve”.
Initially the ALR comprised 4.7 million hectares (5% of the province).
Despite boundary changes over the decades, its area remains approximately
the same. 50
How It Operates
The Agricultural Land Reserve takes precedence over, but does not replace
other legislation and bylaws that may apply to the land. Local and regional
governments, as well as other provincial agencies, are expected to plan in
accordance with the provincial policy of preserving agricultural land.
49 www.alc.gov.bc.ca
50 www.alc.gov.bc.ca/alr/alr_main.htm
If you have land within the ALR, it means that the land is subject to the
Agricultural Land Commission Act. Subdivision and non-farm use of land
in the ALR generally require an application and approval of the Agricultural
Land Commission. Certain proposals involving the removal of soil from and/
or the placement of fill on ALR lands may be exempted from the application
filing requirements subject to certain conditions.
For a complete list of subdivision and uses permitted outright, refer to the
Agricultural Land Reserve Use, Subdivision and Procedure Regulation. 51
51 www.alc.gov.bc.ca/alr/Application_Landowner.htm
If you are making an application to exclude land from the ALR, you are
required to provide Notice of Application to the public and submit a Proof
of Serving Notice form with your application. The Applicant Information
Package contains the forms and explains the notice requirements.
Completed applications are sent to the local government in which the land
is located.
If the proposal does not qualify for exemption, the landowner must file an
application for a non-farm use. There is a specific application form for this
type of non-farm use proposal. See Application to Place Fill or Remove Soil
under the Agricultural Land Commission Act. The application fee is $600
and the completed application is sent to the local government in which the
property is located.
52 www.alc.gov.bc.ca/alr/Application_Landowner.htm
53 www.alc.gov.bc.ca/alr/Application_NFU_Fill-Soil.htm
Address
Owner
Contact
Legal Description
Size (ft/m)
Dimensions (ft/m)
Zoning
OCP
BUILDING
Size (ft/m)
Dimensions (ft/m)
Height (ft/m)
Utilities
Parking (# stalls)
Other
For a more detailed site/property assessment form go to the Appraisal
Institute of Canada at www.aicanada.ca/e/articles/document_library_old.cfm.
54 www.alc.gov.bc.ca/alr/Application_Trans-Util.htm
5. Buy the land – Bring together the various landowners to buy the
land. This may be done in a variety of ways. Typically, if the buyer is a
government entity it will buy the property directly either through:
The latter option is usually a last resort and can be quite lengthy
and contentious. However there are also alternatives to a direct
government purchase. Government may chose to:
55 Land Assembly for Development, Owen Connellan, Kingston University, UK, 2002.
Land Assembly and Redevelopment, pp1- 3.
<www.dca.state.ga.us/intra_nonpub/Toolkit/Guides/LndAsmblyRedevt.pdf>
For more details on the Community Charter visit the Charter web page at:
http://www.qp.gov.bc.ca/statreg/stat/C/03026_03.htm#Part03Division01
Dybvig, Larry, ed. The Appraisal of Real Estate. Second Ed. Vancouver, BC.
The Sauder School of Business, 2005
Jensen, Jack ed., “ROI On-line Real Estate Development Manual”, 7 July
2005.Rural Opportunities Inc.,. <www.ruralinc.org/English/Programs/
development_manual.htm>
Miles, Mike E., ed. Real Estate Development Principles and Process. 3rd ed.
Washington, DC.: Urban Land Institute, 2005.