Module 3 Topic 1 Theoretical Considerations
Module 3 Topic 1 Theoretical Considerations
Module 3 Topic 1 Theoretical Considerations
The Golden Arches theory of conflict prevention. No two countries that both had
McDonald’s had fought a war against each other since each got its McDonald’s. … (Border
skirmishes and civil wars don’t count, because McDonald’s usually served both sides.) (Friedman,
2000) For example, China and Vietnam may have a conflict over the Paracel Islands in the South
China Sea, but they had not used war to solve the conflict. Both countries host McDonald food
chains. The theory however does not refer literally only to McDonalds but also to other
businesses like Nike and Adidas that manufacture foot gears in both countries. In short,
McDonalds represents foreign businesses that commonly operate in different countries that may
have some political tensions. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine though could be an exemption from
this theory. The presence and operation of American and European global corporations in both
countries did not stop Putin from invading Ukraine, unmindful of the invasion’s consequences to
Russia’s economy. The long term goals of Putin is to gradually annex Ukraine by supporting
secessionist groups to separate pro-Russian local government units from Ukraine, to acquire
the untapped and undeveloped gas and oil reserves of Ukraine particularly in its exclusive
economic zone in the Black Sea, and to weaken Ukraine and install a pro-Russian government
in order for Ukraine not to be a member of the European Union and the military security
organization - North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) which is led by America - by not being
a member, Ukraine will forever be a buffer zone between NATO countries and Russia ensuring
Russia’s national security.
The Dell theory of conflict prevention. No two countries that are both part of a major
global supply chain, like Dell’s, will fight a war against each other if they are both part of the
same global supply chain. Because people embedded in major global supply chains don’t want
to fight old-time wars anymore. They want to make just-in-time deliveries of goods and services
– and enjoy the rising standards of living that come with that. (Friedman, 2006)
Cowboy vs. Spaceship Economics. The first two industrial revolutions were guided by
cowboy economics which is characterized by massive extraction of resources for mass
production of goods for a bigger market and earning big profit. This supports the maxim, “Big is
beautiful.” However, the environmental consequences of rapid industrialization and the widening
gap between the urban and rural areas, between the capitalists and the working class, and
between the Global North (rich countries) and the Global South (poor countries) gave rise to an
alternative system which is called spaceship economics (promoted in IR 3.0 and IR 4.0) that is
characterized by the sustainable use and management of resources. It is guided by the maxim,
“Small is beautiful.” Korten (1990) summarized the contrasting features of the two systems.
Module 3 Topic 1 2
● Poverty is simply the result of ● When the people control the local
inadequate growth, which in environmental resources on which their
turn results from inadequate own and their children’s lives depend,
capital investment. they are more likely than absentee
● Those workers who are owners to exercise responsible
displaced from agriculture or stewardship.
other rural resource-based
occupations, such as fishing, by
productivity enhancing capital
investments will be readily
absorbed in industrial
Module 3 Topic 1 4
The features or principles of the spaceship economics are aligned with the 17 UN
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) the four interrelated principles of which are as follows:
respect Earth and life in all its diversity; care for the community of life with understanding,
compassion and love; build democratic societies that are just, participatory, sustainable and
peaceful; and, secure Earth's bounty and beauty for present and future generations.