Drivers License Notice To Police

County of______________
OFFICE OF THE CLERIC

Salem, Oregon
COMMON LAW VEHICULAR JUDICIAL NOTICE
CONSTITUTIONAL DRIVERS LICENSE
THE UNDERSIGNED Common Law Citizen Robert Seymour; King hereby Certifies, by
Rights Secured under provisions of the Constitution of the United States of America, the
Constitution of the several states, Common Law, Nature and Laws of Natures GOD, that
these Rights are retained in FEE SIMPLE ABSOLUTE, and held and protected with
special regard to Rights designated and/or set forth as follows: ALSO NOTE Rights and
Property are ONE AND THE SAME THING-by the Honorable Justice LOUIS
BRANDIS U.S. SUPREME COURT.
NOTICE AND ADVISORY OF RIGHTS CLAIMED INVIOLATE:
1) The Right to TRAVEL FREELY, UNENCUMBERED, and UNFETTERED is
guaranteed as a RIGHT and not a mere privilege. That the Right to TRAVEL is such a
BASIC RIGHT it does NOT even need to be mentioned for it is SELF-evident by
Common Sense that the Right to TRAVEL is a BASIC CONCOMMITANT of a FREE
Society to come and go from length and breath FREELY UNENCUMBERED and
UNFETTERED distinguishes the characteristic required for a FREE PEOPLE TO EXIST
IN FACT. Please See SHAPIRO vs. THOMSON, 394 U. S. 618 . Further, the Right to
TRAVEL by private conveyance for private purposes upon the Common way can NOT
BE INFRINGED. No license or permission is required for TRAVEL when such
TRAVEL IS NOT for the purpose of [COMMERCIAL] PROFIT OR GAIN on the open
highways operating under license IN COMMERCE. The above named Common Law
Citizen listed IS NOT OPERATING IN COMMERCE and as such is thereby
EXEMPTED FROM THE REQUIREMENT OF A LICENSE AS SUCH. Further, the
Oregon, state, is FORBIDDEN BY LAW from converting a BASIC RIGHT into a
PRIVILEGE and requiring a LICENSE and or a FEE CHARGED for the exercise of the
BASIC RIGHT. Please SEE MURDOCK vs. PENNSYLVANIA, 319 U.S. 105, and if
Oregon, state does ERRONIOUSLY convert BASIC RIGHTS into PRIVILEGES and
require a License or FEE a Citizen may IGNORE THE LICENSE OR FEE WITH
TOTAL IMMUNITY FOR SUCH EXERCISE OF A BASIC RIGHT. Please see
Schuttlesworth vs. BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA, 373 U.S. 262. Now if a Citizen
exercises a BASIC RIGHT and a Law of ANY state is to the contrary of such exercise of
that BASIC RIGHT, the said supposed Law of ANY state is a FICTION OF LAW and
100% TOTALLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL and NO COURTS ARE BOUND TO
UPHOLD IT AND NO Citizen is REQUIRED TO OBEY SUCH
UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW OR LICENSE REQUIREMENT. Please see
MARBURY vs. MADISON, 5 U.S. 137 (1803), which has never been overturned in over
194 years, see Shephard's Citations. Now further, if a Citizen relies in good faith on the
advice of Counsel and or on the Decisions of the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
that Citizen has a PERFECT DEFENSE to the element of WILLFULNESS and since
the burden of proof of said WILLFULNESS is on the Prosecution to prove beyond a
REASONABLE DOUBT, said task or burden being totally impossible to specifically
preform there is NO CAUSE OF ACTION FOR WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED
BY A COURT OF LAW. Please see U.S. vs. Bishop 412 U.S. 346 . OBVIOUSLY
THERE IS NO LAWFUL CHARGE AGAINST EXERCISING A BASIC Right to
TRAVEL for a regular Common Law Citizen NOT IN COMMERCE on the
common way Public HlGHWAY. THAT IS THE LAW!!! The above named Citizen
IS IMMUNE FROM ANY CHARGE TO THE CONTRARY AND ANY PARTY
MAKING SUCH CHARGE SHOULD BE DULY WARNED OF THE TORT OF
TRESPASS!!! YOU ARE TRESPASSING ON THIS Common Law Citizen!!!
2) The original and Judicial jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court is ALL
actions in which a State may be party, thru subdivision, political or trust. This includes
ALL state approved subdivisions and/or INCORPORATED Cities, Townships,
Municipalities, and Villages, Et Al . Please see Article 3, Section 2, Para. (1) and (2), U.S.
Constitution.
3) The undersigned has NEVER willingly and knowingly entered into ANY Contract or
Contractual agreement giving up ANY Constitutional Rights which are secured by the
CONSTITUTION, the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. This Common Law Citizen
has NOT harmed any party, has NOT threatened any party, and that includes has NOT
threatened or caused any endangerment to the safety or well being of any party and
would leave any claimant otherwise to their strictest proofs otherwise IN A COURT OF
LAW. The above named Citizen is merely exercising the BASIC RIGHT TO TRAVEL
UNENCUMBERED and UNFETTERED on the Common public way or highway, which
is their RIGHT TO SO DO!!! Please see Zobel vs. Williams, 457 U.S. 55, held the
RIGHT TO TRAVEL is Constitutionally PROTECTED!!
4) Conversion of the RIGHT TO TRAVEL into a PRIVILEGE and or CRIME is A
FRAUD and is in clear and direct conflict with she UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION,
THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. LAWS made by any state, which are clearly in
direct CONFLICT or REPUGNANCY are UNCONSTITUTIONAL and are NOT
WITH STANDING IN LAW AND ARE BEING CHALLENGED AS SUCH HERE
AND THEREBY ARE NULL AND VOID OF LAW ON THEIR FACE. NO COURTS
ARE BOUND TO UPHOLD SUCH FICTIONS OF LAW AND NO Citizen is bound to
obey such a FICTION OF LAW. SUCH REGULATION OR LAW OPERATES AS A
MERE NULLITY OR FICTION OF LAW AS IF IT NEVER EXISTED IN LAW. No
CITIZEN IS BOUND TO OBEY SUCH UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW!!!!!
5) The payment for a privilege requires a benefit to be received As the RIGHT TO
TRAVEL is already secured it is clearly unlawful to cite any charges without direct
damage to the specific party . Nor may a Citizen be charged with an offense for the
exercise of a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, in this case the RIGHT TO TRAVEL. Please
see Miller vs. UNITED STATES 230 F2d 486 . Nor may a Citizen be denied DUE
PROCESS OF LAW or EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW.
6) The undersigned does hereby claim, declare, and certify ANY AND ALL their
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS INVIOLATE from GOD and secured in THE UNITED
STATES CONSTITUTION and the CONSTITUTION OF THE state wherein they abode
as a SOVEREIGN, COMMON LAW CITIZEN existing and acting entirely AT THE
COMMON LAW, and retains ALL BASIC RIGHTS under the CONSTITUTION forTHE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATURE AND NATURE'S GOD AND UNDER
THE LAWS OF GOD THE SUPREME LAW GIVER.
7) ANY VIOLATOR OF THE ABOVE CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND CLAIM
IS CRIMINALLY TRESPASSING UPON THIS ABOVE NAMED COMMON LAW
Citizen and WILL BE PROSECUTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT UNDER THE
SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. BE WARNED OF THE TRESPASS AND THE
ATTACHED CAVEATS. ALSO TAKE CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE, IGNORANCE
OF THE LAW IS NOT AN EXCUSE!!
SIGNATURE OF THE ABOVE NOTED Common Law Citizen is

signed_________________________________________
WITNESS________________________________________ Date_______________
WITNESS________________________________________ Date_______________
or
NOTARY PUBLIC_________________________________ MY COMMISSION
EXPIRES____________________________
Form below use for County Clerk
state of OREGON
COUNTY OF_______________
1, ___________________________________, CLERK of the County of
_____________________________________, thereof do hereby certify the
Citizen above named has sworn to the contents of this document and that
same is TRUE AND CORRECT. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have
hereto set my hand and affixed the SEAL of said CIRCUIT COURT, at
the City of __________________________________ , OREGON this
________________day of_______________________, AD.__________
______________________________________Deputy County Clerk for
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________COUNTY CLERK

Drivers License Notice To Police

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Drivers License Notice To Police

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Drivers License Notice To Police

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

County of______________

OFFICE OF THE CLERIC

SIGNATURE OF THE ABOVE NOTED Common Law Citizen is

You might also like