From The Safe Space Into Cyberspace
From The Safe Space Into Cyberspace
From The Safe Space Into Cyberspace
THE POITICS
Centre
for
Transforming
Sexuality
and
Gender
&
The
School
of
Media
University
of
Brighton
15th
-‐
16th
March
2019
Welcome!
The
organising
team
would
like
to
welcome
you
to
the
2019
Lesbian
Lives
conference
on
the
Politics
of
(In)Visibility.
The
theme
of
this
year’s
conference
feels
very
urgent
as
attacks
on
feminism
and
feminists
from
both
misogynist,
homophobic,
transphobic
and
racist
quarters
are
on
the
rise
both
here
in
the
UK
and
elsewhere.
It
has
been
thrilling
to
see
the
many
creative
and
critical
proposals
responding
to
this
coming
in
from
academics,
students,
activists,
film-‐makers,
writers
artists,
and
others
working
in
diverse
sectors
from
across
many
different
countries
–
and
now
you
are
here!
We
are
delighted
to
be
hosting
the
conference
in
collaboration
with
feminist
scholars
from
University
College
Dublin,
St
Catharine’s
College,
Cambridge
and
Maynooth
University.
It
is
-‐
what
we
think
-‐
the
24th
Lesbian
lives
conference,
although
we
are
getting
to
the
stage
where
we
might
start
losing
count.
Let’s
just
say
it
is
now
a
conference
of
some
maturity
that
remains
relevant
in
every
age,
as
the
world’s
most
longstanding
academic
conference
in
Lesbian
Studies.
What
we
do
know
is
that
the
first
ever
Lesbian
Lives
Conference
was
held
in
1993
in
University
College
Dublin
and
has
been
trooping
on
since,
with
the
dedication
of
academics
and
activists
and
the
amazing
support
from
the
community.
From
this
comes
the
unique
atmosphere
of
the
Lesbian
Lives
Conference
which
is
something
special
–
as
Katherine
O’Donnell,
one
of
the
founders
of
the
conference,
said:
‘there
is
a
friendliness,
a
warmth,
an
excitement,
an
openness,
a
bravery
and
gentleness
that
every
Lesbian
Lives
Conference
has
generated’.
We
are
very
pleased
to
welcome
Katherine
who
has
been
so
central
to
the
conference,
as
one
of
our
keynotes
this
year,
for
something
that
is
going
to
be
very
special,
alongside
Phyll
Opoku-‐Gyimah,
the
amazing
Director
and
Co-‐Founder
of
UK
Black
Pride
and
activist-‐scholar
and
researcher
of
grassroots
feminist
social
movements
Julia
Downes.
We
would
like
to
thank
The
School
of
Media
for
supporting
the
conference,
and
I
would
like
to
especially
thank
the
administrative
team
and
our
volunteers
for
all
their
hard
work.
Thank
you
also
to
all
delegates
who
at
this
conference
will
come
together
to
further
probe
what
the
politics
of
(in)visibility
means
to
the
LGBTQ
community
and
individuals
today,
and
we
look
forward
to
two
days
of
stimulating
papers,
debates,
performances,
workshops
and
screenings.
Olu
Kath Browne, Caroline Gonda, Jenny Keane, Irmi Karl, Katherine O’Donnell and Patricia Pietro-‐Blanco
2
Keynotes
Phyll
Opoku-‐Gyimah,
Executive
Director
and
Co-‐Founder
of
UK
Black
Pride
Widely
known
as
Lady
Phyll
–
partly
due
to
her
decision
to
reject
an
MBE
in
the
New
Year’s
Honours’
list
to
protest
Britain’s
role
in
formulating
anti-‐LGBT
penal
codes
across
its
empire
–
she
is
a
senior
official
at
the
Public
and
Commercial
Services
(PCS)
trade
union
as
the
Head
of
Equality
&
Learning,
as
well
as
a
community
builder
and
organiser;
a
Stonewall
Trustee;
Diva
Magazine
columnist,
and
public
speaker
focusing
on
race,
gender
sexuality
and
class
and
intersectionality.
Phyll
has
been
nominated
for
and
won
numerous
accolades
including
the
European
Diversity
Awards
Campaigner
of
the
Year
in
2017,
she
is
also
in
the
top
10
on
World
Pride
Power
list.
Phyll
is
also
the
co-‐editor
and
author
of
the
‘Sista’
Anthology,
writing
by
and
about
same
gender
loving
women
of
African
Caribbean
descent
with
a
UK
connection.
Phyll
is
a
working
class,
family-‐orientated
Ghanaian
woman
who
understands
the
Twi
and
Fanti
languages
which
connect
her
to
a
rich
African
cultural
heritage
that
advocates
for
unity
and
equality.
She
also
prides
herself
on
being
a
passionate
activist
who
commits
to
working
diligently
to
make
people
aware
of
on-‐going
inequalities
and
injustices
facing
the
Black
LGBT+
community.
She
has
worked
tirelessly
to
build
up
UK
Black
Pride
by
bringing
together
artists,
activists,
volunteers
and
supporters
from
across
the
LGBT+
community.
Phyll
supports
Paris
Black
Pride
and
ensures
UK
Black
Pride
is
part
of
the
International
Federation
of
Black
Prides
around
the
world.
Phyll
cites
her
maxim
as
a
quotation
from
Maya
Angelou:
‘prejudice
is
a
burden
that
confuses
the
past,
threatens
the
future
and
renders
the
present
inaccessible’.
Katherine O’Donnell, Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, University College Dublin
“Lesbians
are
not
women”:
Considering
Trans
Female
&
Lesbian
Identities,
Gender,
Safety
&
Liberation
This
paper
begins
with
a
personal
reflection
on
the
intoxicating
essay
of
Monique
Wittig
from
1981,
entitled
“One
is
Not
Born
a
Woman”
where
Wittig
argues
that
a
lesbian
is
‘not
a
woman,
either
economically,
politically
or
ideologically.’
I
recall
how
Wittig’s
essay
allowed
many
young
lesbians
in
the
1980s
to
think
about
female
gender
as
something
that
was
constructed
and
fixed
by
the
demands
of
patriarchal
heterosexuality
and
her
essay
led
us
to
particular
visions
of
political
liberation.
I
also
explore
how
Wittig’s
vision
of
the
lesbian
as
a
fugitive
from
the
class
of
‘women’
might
be
described
as
a
kind
of
‘feminist
misogyny’
that
has
profound
limitations
in
imagining
and
enacting
freedom
from
patriarchy.
The
phrase
‘feminist
misogyny’
is
not
widely
known
but
I
think
the
kinds
of
depiction
of
women
which
we
might
describe
as
‘feminist
misogyny’
is
very
evident
in
classic
feminist
texts
and
is
certainly
useful
in
describing
some
of
the
ways
in
which
I
thought
about
femininity
for
much
of
my
life.
I
discuss
how
reading
work
by
trans
lesbians
helped
me
to
recognise
my
own
feminist
misogyny
and
offered
me
ways
to
revaluate
the
category
of
‘woman’
and
how
I
might
relate
to
this
identity.
I
propose
that
revisiting
Wittig’s
remarkable
essay
allows
us
a
lens
through
which
we
might
gently
consider
polarised
depictions
of
trans
women
by
those
who
hold
trans
exclusionary
radical
feminist
positions.
The
paper
concludes
with
a
discussion
of
how
we
might
understand
trans
female
identities
to
overlap
and
diverge
with
cis
lesbian
identities,
proposing
that
the
similarities
of
3
experience
in
relation
to
gender
norms
might
be
the
very
reason
for
moments
of
incomprehension
or
misrecognition
between
the
two
groups.
Katherine
O’Donnell
is
Assoc.
Prof.
History
of
Ideas,
UCD
School
of
Philosophy
and
is
a
member
of
Justice
for
Magdalenes
Research.
She
studied
feminist
philosophy
with
Mary
Daly
at
Boston
College
and
also
studied
at
University
of
California
at
Berkeley
while
completing
her
Ph.D.
thesis
on
the
Gaelic
background
to
Edmund
Burke’s
political
thought.
She
was
appointed
as
a
College
Lecturer
in
Women’s
Studies
in
UCD
and
went
on
to
become
Director
of
UCD
Women’s
Studies
Centre,
a
position
she
held
for
ten
years
until
2015.
She
has
been
involved
in
Queer
and
Feminist
activist
politics
in
Ireland
since
1983
(including
being
a
co-‐founder
of
the
Irish
Queer
Archive
held
by
the
National
Library
of
Ireland)
and
she
has
been
a
key
organiser
in
the
Lesbian
Lives
Conference
since
1997.
In
the
academic
years
2015/16
and
2016/17
she
taught
modules
in
Feminist
Philosophy
on
the
University
of
Oxford’s
B.Phil
programme.
In
2017
she
was
appointed
to
her
current
position
as
Assoc.
Prof.
in
the
History
of
Ideas
at
UCD.
She
has
published
widely
in
the
history
of
sexuality
and
gender
and
also
the
intellectual
history
of
Eighteenth
Century
Ireland.
Re-‐imagining an End to Gendered Violence: Prefiguring the worlds we want
Dr
Julia
Downes
is
a
Lecturer
in
Criminology
in
the
Faculty
of
Arts
and
Social
Sciences
at
The
Open
University
(UK).
She
is
recognised
as
an
activist-‐scholar
and
researcher
of
grassroots
feminist
social
movements
and
anti-‐carceral
feminist
approaches
to
gendered
violence,
abuse
and
harms.
She
was
awarded
funding
from
the
Feminist
Review
Trust
in
2015
to
support
a
collaborative
research
project
with
survivors
within
grassroots
social
movements
in
the
UK.
This
resulted
in
an
accessible
report
and
toolkit,
blogs
and
workshop
programmes
to
support
transformative
justice
approaches
to
violence
and
harm
within
grassroots
social
movements.
This
activity
led
to
invitations
to
speak
internationally
for
the
Candidature
of
Popular
Unity
(Catalonia)
and
the
University
of
the
Basque
Country.
Throughout
her
career
she
has
made
academic
contributions
to
contemporary
understandings
of
gendered
violence,
ethics
and
research
practice
and
grassroots
social
movements
including
journals:
Women’s
Studies
(2012),
Graduate
Journal
of
Social
Science
(2013)
Sociological
Research
Online
(2014)
and
Justice,
Power
and
Resistance
(2017)
and
edited
book
collections
including:
Sexual
Violence
and
Restorative
Justice
(E.
Zinsstag
&
M.
Keenan,
Routledge
2017),
Women’s
Legal
Landmarks
(R.
Auchmuty
&
E.
Rackley,
Hart
2018)
and
Resisting
the
Punitive
State
(J.
Greener,
E.
Hart
&
R.
Moth,
Pluto
2019).
She
is
a
founding
member
of
the
salvage
collective
and
coordinator
of
Sheffield
Transformative
Justice
Learning
Group.
4
Institution/Affiliation:
PhD
student,
Centre
for
Film
and
Screen,
Clare
College,
University
of
Cambridge.
Title:
Off-‐screen
space:
Barbara
Hammer’s
lesbian
experimental
cinema
Abstract:
Barbara
Hammer
is
widely
considered
to
be
the
“first”
or
“most
prolific”
experimental
lesbian
filmmaker.
Since
the
1960s,
she
has
created
over
80
films,
as
well
as
performances,
sculptures,
installations,
poetry,
prose,
and
essays.
This
paper
explores
how
Hammer’s
cinema
contributes
to
on-‐going
debates
surrounding
lesbian
self-‐identification,
resistance
to
categorization,
critical
negativity
versus
utopianism,
and
the
role
of
aesthetic
or
intellectual
experimentation
in
queer
activism.
In
Dyketactics
(1974),
often
called
the
“first
lesbian
lovemaking
film
made
by
a
lesbian,”
Hammer
uses
superimposition
and
editing
techniques
to
question
the
distinction
between
essence
and
performance.
In
works
such
as
Pond
and
Waterfall
(1982)
and
Bent
Time
(1983),
she
tackles
the
politics
of
lesbian
representation
and
the
pressures
of
the
avant-‐garde
art
market,
asking
what
it
means
to
make
a
“lesbian
film”
without
any
reference
to
lesbianism.
Available
Space
(1978)
addresses
the
boundaries
of
lesbian
intimacy
by
doing
away
with
the
limits
of
the
screen
itself,
while
Audience
(1982)
documents
the
responses
to
Hammer’s
portrayals
of
lesbianism.
In
Nitrate
Kisses
(1992),
Hammer
interjects
archival
footage
with
erotic
performances
to
ask
what
we,
as
queer
activists
or
artists,
censor
within
our
own
communities.
Hammer’s
work
is
itself
often
neglected
in
histories
of
lesbian
cinema
due
to
its
formal
experimentation,
and
from
accounts
of
avant-‐garde
film
history
due
to
its
lesbian
content.
In
“The
Invisible
Screen:
Lesbian
Cinema”
(1988),
Hammer
writes:
‘In
physics,
light
can
be
understood
through
wave
and
particle
theories
at
the
same
time.
So,
too,
there
can
be
multiple,
coexisting
and
different
theories
and
understandings
of
“lesbianisms”
through
a
variety
of
readings.’
Refusing
to
see
form
and
content
as
separable,
Hammer’s
experimental
cinema
makes
room
for
what
Teresa
de
Lauretis
has
called
the
“off-‐screen
space”
between
multiple
readings
of
lesbian
art
and
politics.
Title:
Revisiting
the
lesbian
closet:
Hungarian
lesbians’
decisions
not
to
come
out
in
their
families
of
origin
Abstract:
The
politics
of
visibility
maintains
that
coming
out
is
essential
for
the
social
acceptance
and
emancipation
of
lesbians,
as
well
as
for
their
personal
well-‐being
(Dank
2000).
In
this
model,
those
who
stay
closeted
from
their
immediate
environment
are
seen
as
struggling
with
internalized
homophobia
or
worried
about
their
personal
safety.
While
some
researchers
do
problematize
this
approach
to
coming
out
in
non-‐European
contexts
(e.g.
Boellstorff
2005,
Decena
2008),
it
is
widely
assumed
also
in
academic
circles
that
Western-‐type
gay
and
lesbian
identities
automatically
connect
to
an
ethics
of
visibility
characteristic
of
North
American
and
Western
European
activism.
5
I
would
like
to
problematize
this
approach
with
examples
of
women
I
have
interviewed
during
my
ethnographic
fieldwork
in
Hungary,
which
focused
on
the
relationship
between
same-‐sex
couples
and
their
families
of
origin.
In
this
context,
maintaining
connections
with
the
family
of
origin
is
essential
for
the
survival
of
lesbians
in
practical
and
emotional
terms,
and
giving
up
individual
goals
for
the
sake
of
the
family
unit
is
widespread
practice,
including
within
the
LGBTQ
community.
I
will
demonstrate
that
staying
closeted
from
the
family
of
origin
may
be
motivated
by
emotional
distance,
a
family
culture
of
not
talking
about
sexuality,
or
even
concern
for
other
family
members’
well-‐being.
I
will
argue
that
coming
out
and
the
closet
should
be
reinterpreted
in
a
way
that
examines
context,
power
relations
and
agency.
Institution/Affiliation:
Senior
Lecturer
in
Film
Studies,
Institutionen
för
film
och
litteratur,
Fakulteten
för
konst
och
humaniora
Linnaeus
University
(Sweden)
Title: From the safe space into cyberspace? The ambivalence of lesbian visibility in film archives
Abstract:
Visibility
has
long
been
an
important
goal
in
European
lesbian
activism
and
an
important
means
of
political
empowerment.
Yet,
visibility
can
also
bring
about
an
increased
vulnerability
for
marginalized
groups,
especially
in
times
of
hate
speech
and
an
increasing
political
backlash.
Moreover,
we
need
to
ask:
whose
visibility
is
recognized
by
whom,
and
on
what
grounds?
In
my
paper
I
look
at
the
ways
both
national
and
grassroots
film
archives
recognize
lesbian
lives
through
collection
and
selection
policies,
through
the
use
of
metadata
and
via
the
curation
of
online
access.
Presenting
case
studies
from
the
Swedish
and
British
Film
Institutes,
from
the
Hamburg-‐based
archive
bildwechsel
as
well
as
the
Lesbian
Home
Movie
Project
in
Maine,
this
paper
discusses
the
ambivalence
of
lesbian
visibility
after
(amateur)
film
footage
has
left
the
safe
space
of
the
archive
to
be
widely
circulated
online.
The
paper
looks
at
legal
and
ethical
challenges
archivists
are
facing
when
dealing
with
nudity,
lesbian
affection
and
other
representations
which
challenge
hegemonic
heteronormative
scopic
regimes.
How
can
an
ethically
conducted
archival
practice
be
guaranteed?
How
can
archives
avoid
making
lesbian
lives
invisible
again?
This
paper
presents
some
of
the
results
of
my
research
project
“The
Cultural
Heritage
of
the
Moving
Image”
(Swedish
Research
Council
2016-‐2018).
Institution/Affiliation:
Croatian
writer,
film
and
cultural
critic,
and
a
lesbian/feminist
activist.
And
PhD
at
the
Europa
University
Viadrina.
Title: Lesbian polytics: From the screen to the sheets and into the streets
Abstract:
For
at
least
half
a
century
lesbian
(mainstream)
on-‐screen
representations
have
been
focus
of
much
academic
and
activist
critique
and
discontent
–
(re)producing
stereotypes
of
lesbian/female
sexuality
has
been
extremely
reductive
and
thus
oppressive
and
stifling
to
political
potentials
of
sex
and
desire
that
excludes
men
and
through
this
ellipsis
challenges
(hetero)patriarchy.
Luckily,
this
critique,
alongside
political
movements,
micro-‐
and
macroactivist
endeavours
in
outing
different
kinds
of
lesbianism
and
female
sexuality,
have
borne
fruit
–
and
much
of
it
of
visual
kind.
Indeed,
it
can
be
claimed
that
the
mainstream
celluloid
and
digital
portrayals
of
lesbians
are
more
versatile
6
and
complex
than
ever
before
–
with
TV
shows
such
as
the
L-‐Word
running
for
as
many
as
6
seasons
(and
the
7th
on
the
way!)1
–
catapulting
lesbianism,
in
word
and
in
action,
into
the
heart
of
mainstream,
yet
aiming
for
female/lesbian
gaze,
for
a
change.
However,
as
victories
for
lesbian
visibility
can
rightfully
be
celebrated
(wholeheartedly,
or
with
a
grain
of
salt)
–
a
new
"alternative"
sexual
battleground
is
slowly
being
laid
out
in
mainstream/popular
culture,
this
one
also
embracing
(representations
of)
lesbian
desire:
polyamory.
In
the
workshop
we
will
briefly
present
the
concept(s)
of
polyamory,
particularly
with
regards
to
lesbian
polyamorous
practices,
offering
the
main
findings
and
insights
of
existing
literature
(the
extent
will
depend
on
the
participants'
experience
and
knowledge
of
the
topic).
As
is
usually
the
case,
male
sexuality
prevails
in
the
materials
representing
polyamory,
but
we
will
dig
deeper
and
offer
closer
readings
of
more
popular
and
visible
films
and
series
representing
lesbian
polyamorous
desire/practices
(from
dubiously
polyamorous
Allen's
Vicky
Cristina
Barcelona
to
Angela
Robinson's
Professor
Marston
and
the
Wonder
Women,
or
the
latest
Netflix
series
Wanderlust).
The
main
aim
of
the
workshop,
however,
is
to
encourage
and
spark
up
a
passionate
discussion
about
political
potentials
of
lesbian
polyamory
and
female
non-‐monogamous
desire,
and
perhaps
seduce
some
participants
into
partaking
in
this
revolution.
Title: Queer haven Berlin?: Lesbian* visibility within the queer of colour discourse in Berlin
Abstract:
Since
the
1960s
Berlin
has
been
a
destination
for
various
waves
of
migrants
from
Turkey.
Amongst
the
many
migrating
groups,
Turkish
speaking
queers
have
been
largely
neglected
in
the
mainstream,
as
well
as
academic
and
activist
discourses
on
migration.
In
the
literature,
most
of
the
debate
focuses
on
space-‐making
practices
of
Türkiyeli1
queers,
and
most
of
the
academic
work
foregrounds
male
sexuality
and
racial
dynamics
among
male
queers.
Lesbians*
of
colour
as
sexualized
and
racialized
subjects
who
negotiate
their
place
and
voice
in
the
gay-‐dominated
Berlin
queer
scene
have
been
neglected
in
most
of
these
discussions.
Recently,
with
the
new
wave
of
queer
migrants
from
Turkey,
Turkish
speaking
queers
started
a
group
called
Kuir
Lubun
Berlin.
The
group
brings
together
LGBTI+s
of
various
class,
generation,
legal
status,
activist
experience,
which
is
particularly
important
in
the
current
political
climate
of
the
global
rise
of
the
right.
The
FLT*
(women/lesbian/trans)
section
of
the
group,
that
we
are
active
members
of,
works
on
the
particular
questions
related
to
the
struggles
and
visibility
of
the
FLT*
of
colour.
In
the
workshop
and
discussion
we
will
explore
what
we
believe
is
the
radical
potential
of
the
Türkiyeli
FLT*
activism
in
unsettling
the
dominant
narratives
of
migration
with
a
twofold
intervention;
first
to
the
heterosexualized
history
of
labour
migration
between
two
countries,
and
second
to
the
West-‐centric
sexist
queer
scene
in
Berlin.
We
want
to
engage
with
FLT*
activists
and
academics
(of
colour),
sharing
insights,
experiences
and
arguments
in
order
to
enrich
and
contribute
to
the
existing
research
focusing
on
migration,
sexuality
and
ethnicized/racialized
difference
that
would
challenge
Western
neoliberal
accounts
of
queer
subjecthood.
We
want
to
give
an
input
we
will
play
a
keyword
game
that
we
will
incorporate
our
own
personal
stories
and
research
findings,
and
conduct
a
fishbowl
discussion
with
the
questions
arising
from
the
game.
7
Institution/Affiliation:
LGBT
Foundation
Title: The Sexual Wellbeing of Women Who Have Sex With Women – What Do We Know?
Abstract:
Manchester
based
charity
-‐
LGBT
Foundation
–
run
one
of
the
only
funded
wellbeing
programmes
exclusively
for
lesbian
and
bi
women,
in
the
country,
including
advice
and
guidance
on
sexual
health
and
relationships.
In
response
to
the
missing
evidence
base
on
these
topics,
in
2017
we
conducted
the
largest
known
National
Sexual
Wellbeing
Survey
for
Women
Who
Have
Sex
With
Women
(WSW),
receiving
over
2,500
responses
in
just
4
months.
Under
the
headings
“Wellbeing,
Confidence
and
Communication”,
“Knowledge
and
Access
to
Support”
and
“Abuse
and
Risk”,
this
survey
has
asked
women
who
have
sex
with
women
a
broad
range
of
questions
around
sexual
wellbeing
including
on
pleasure,
body
confidence,
minority
identities,
testing,
what
constitutes
“having
sex”,
negotiating
consent,
group
sex
and
much
more.
Following
the
analysis
of
this
data
in
December
2018,
which
will
be
overseen
by
renowned
researcher
around
sexual
orientation
and
health
–
Professor
Catherine
Meads,
LGBT
Foundation
would
like
to
present
the
key
findings
to
your
audience
of
stakeholders
and
influencers
and
workshop
together
the
“What
next?”
questions
with
the
aim
of
identifying
and
meeting
the
sexual
wellbeing
needs
of
our
WSW
communities
in
the
years
to
come.
Institution/Affiliation:
Abstract:
In
1979,
a
20-‐year-‐old
London
lesbian
—
who
had
come
out
to
friends
the
previous
year
—
attended
her
first
Gay
Pride
March.
Both
events
marked
the
beginning
of
my
40
year
(and
counting)
personal,
political
and
cultural
journey
as
lesbian
activist,
performer,
writer
and
historian,
reflected
in
my
substantial
private
archive
which
chronicles
and
reflects
the
social
and
political
history
and
evolution
of
a
community’s
fight
for
equality
and
justice:
the
battles,
campaigns,
victories
and
losses.
Jan
Pimblett
at
London
Metropolitan
Archives
has
said,
‘History
is
a
set
of
examples’.
And
it
has
been
my
fate
to
have
witnessed,
participated
in
and
chronicled
many
such
‘examples’.
They include:
• The role of Oval House Theatre in lesbian and gay performance/activism
• The battles against Section 28, including the founding of Stonewall
8
•
And,
most
importantly,
my
four
years
as
first
lesbian
co-‐editor
of
City
Limits
magazine’s
‘Out
in
the
City’
section
This
presentation
affords
a
rare
opportunity
to
explore
forty
years
of
lesbian
history
and
experience,
featuring
first-‐hand
anecdotes,
cuttings,
photos
and
ephemera
from
my
archive
—
a
‘taster’
for
a
major
multi-‐media
project
that
will
be
produced
in
2019.
This
will
include
online/physical
exhibitions;
public
engagement
events
throughout
the
UK,
and
a
new
mixed
media
solo
stage
show,
written
and
performed
by
me.
In
the
last
year,
there
have
been
shows
by
David
Hoyle,
Alexis
Gregory
and
Flaming
Theatre
that
have
focused
on
the
gay
men’s
version
of
our
community’s
history—
now
it’s
time
to
‘flag
up
the
lesbian’.
The
stories,
the
songs,
the
slogans,
the
sit-‐downs,
the
sorrows
and
the
solidarity.
Abstract:
INVISIBLE
WOMEN
is
a
short
documentary
that
will
tell
the
untold
story
of
the
North
West’s
LGBTQ
past
over
the
last
50
years
through
the
lens
of
two
women’s
incredible
journey
of
activism
and
rebellion.
Angela
and
Luchia
have
spent
the
last
half
a
century
fighting
for
their
rights
as
women
and
as
lesbians.
Their
work
has
revolutionised
Manchester
whilst
transforming
the
lives
of
thousands
of
women
and
yet
no
record
of
them
exists
in
the
city’s
archives;
theirs
is
a
story
that
risks
disappearing
from
history.
We
want
to
change
that
with
the
film
Invisible
Women.
The
Story:
Manchester,
1969.
Luchia
Fitzgerald,
a
teenage
Lesbian
runaway
from
Ireland
struggles
to
survive
on
the
streets
of
Manchester.
She’s
arrested
and
sent
for
a
lobotomy
to
cure
her
of
her
“deviant
sexual
tendencies”.
Luchia
escapes
the
lobotomy
to
seek
solace
in
the
New
Union,
a
pub
at
the
epicentre
of
Manchester’s
underground
gay
community.
Luchia
is
at
her
lowest
ebb
when
she
hears
a
female
student
at
the
next
table
giving
voice
to
every
frustration
she
felt;
Luchia
pulls
up
a
chair
to
listen.
That
student
was
Angela
and
this
chance
encounter
sparked
a
relationship
that
has
endured
fifty
years
of
euphoric
highs
and
earth-‐shattering
lows
in
the
struggle
to
change
life
for
ALL
women.
Under
Angela’s
wing
Luchia
is
educated
and
politicised
through
the
burgeoning
women’s
lib
movement
of
the
1970s.
The
pair
fall
in
love
and
form
the
Manchester
branch
of
the
GLF
(Gay
Liberation
Front).
Together
they
experiment
with
activism
beginning
by
painting
“Lesbians
are
everywhere”
in
yellow
across
Manchester.
The
couple
then
progress
to
helping
form
a
rock
band,
opening
a
printing
press
and
squatting
a
house
that
would
become
the
city’s
first
women’s
centre
inspiring
other
local
women
in
the
process.
When
the
police
ask
Angela
and
Luchia
to
start
looking
after
battered
wives
Manchester’s
first
women’s
refuge
is
formed.
As
their
work
gains
a
momentum
of
its
own
and
changes
lives
beyond
the
city
Angela
and
Luchia’s
love
affair
begins
to
falter.
The
GLF
disbands,
the
band
splits
up
and
the
printing
press
closes.
It’s
the
1980s
and
things
are
moving
backwards
not
forwards.
Set
against
this
landscape
of
apathy
comes
a
9
bombshell:
Thatcher’s
repressive
Section
28
bill.
It
is
this
attack
against
their
hard-‐won
rights
that
forces
the
women
to
reunite
and
transform
the
city
once
again.
2017
witnessed
a
rich
variety
of
programmes
and
films
that
explored
the
50
years
since
the
partial
decriminalization
of
homosexuality.
However,
the
vast
majority
of
this
work
focused
almost
exclusively
on
the
experience
of
white,
middle-‐class
gay
men
from
London.
The
women’s
story,
and
particularly
the
story
of
regional
working-‐class
women,
has
largely
been
ignored.
Whilst
the
film
is
ostensibly
about
Angela
and
Luchia's
personal
and
political
journey
we
are
using
their
relationship
to
explore
Manchester
and,
in
particular,
the
forgotten
and,
up
until
now,
untold
story
of
the
North
West’s
LGBTQ
past
through
a
working
class
lens
of
rebellion
and
activism
which
is
still
alive
today:
Angela
and
Luchia
are
still
very
much
fighting
for
their
rights
and
the
rights
of
LGBTQ
people
in
Manchester.
Abstract:
The
poems
tell
a
story
and
a
describe
the
world
from
the
position
of
a
transgender
lesbian
(
me)
whilst
raising
issues
of
women’s
position
in
society,
our
sense
of
self
worth,
the
place
of
transgender
women
in
the
world
and
our
acceptance
and
otherwise
within
womankind
and
specifically
the
lesbian
community.
I
hope
to
stimulate
thought
and
encourage
honest
debate
on
the
above
topics
and
to
perhaps
allay
some
perceived
fears
or
misconceptions.
The
poems
cover
issues
of
acceptance
and
erasure
including
from
within,
the
role
of
the
notion
of
“Queer,”
the
wonders,
the
joys
of
womanhood,
woman
love
and
a
belief
in
the
power
of
womankind.
This
would
also
give
an
insight,
hopefully,
into
the
emotional
lives
of
transwomen
and
trans
lesbians,
(such
as
myself)
out
total
immersion
in
and
commitment
to
womankind
and
promote
greater
mutual
understanding.
Title:
Beyond
the
Visible:
Articulating
Lesbian
Invisibility
Through
Vertical
Logic
and
the
Limits
of
the
Bodily
Horizon
Abstract:
Through
a
reading
of
Luce
Irigaray’s
account
of
the
symbolic
order
as
still
functioning
largely
in
accordance
with
the
Law
of
the
Father,
and
a
consideration
of
the
subsequent
feminist
psychoanalytic
work
that
endeavours
to
mediate
the
mother/daughter
relation,
I
diagnose
a
pervasive
and
continuing
determining
adherence
to
a
logic
of
verticality
and
filiation
in
the
symbolic
realm.
I
suggest
that
as
a
result,
forms
of
female
relationality
that
function
on
an
explicitly
horizontal
axis
are
largely
occluded
and
omitted
both
in
the
symbolic
register
and
in
theory.
I
argue
that
this
is
particularly
the
case
with
regards
to
lesbian
sexuality,
which
functions
off
kilter
to
the
logic
of
generational
transmission.
Further,
in
understanding
the
social
realm
and
phenomenological
experience
to
be
the
sites
wherein
symbolic
structures
are
negotiated
and
enacted,
I
indicate
that
10
lesbian
sexuality
is
therefore
radically
discharged
beyond
the
(vertical)
limit
of
what
is
and
can
be
perceived
or
tolerated
in
the
socio-‐cultural
register,
and
as
such
lesbians
are
necessarily
rendered
literally
‘unseeable’.
This
invisibility,
as
I
show
both
through
reflexive
practice
and
existing
academic
work,
reveals
itself
relentlessly
in
everyday
situations
and
as
such,
I
argue,
impedes
the
ability
to
properly
constitute
socially
intelligible
lesbian
subjectivity(ies).
I
conclude
the
paper
by
suggesting
that
for
lesbians
to
achieve
social
visibility
and
subjectivity
proper,
there
needs
to
be
a
fundamental
paradigmatic
shift
in
the
symbolic
register
to
include
thinking
about
relationality
on
a
horizontal
logic,
but
that
this
work
of
high
theory
should
not
come
at
the
expense
of
thinking
through
lived
realities.
Title: Queering Suffrage: an embroidered strategy for making lesbian lives visible
Abstract:
This
paper
examines
textile
practice
as
a
method
for
disrupting
the
erasure
of
lesbians
from
Women’s
Suffrage
history,
in
my
own
art
practice.
Last
year:
2018,
was
the
100-‐year
anniversary
of
The
Representation
of
the
People
Act
that
granted
women
in
the
UK
partial
suffrage.
In
celebration
of
the
centenary
there
was
funding
and
support
available
for
a
wide
range
of
cultural
events
leading
to
increasing
engagement
in
women’s
history.
However
there
was
a
lack
of
rigorous
work
undertaken
to
challenge
the
collective
memory
of
the
suffrage
movement
as
universally
white,
upper
class
and
hetero-‐normative.
This
has
led
to
the
continued
obscurity
of
many
suffragettes
who
had
meaningful
relationships
with
other
women
including
Eva
Goore-‐Booth,
Esther
Roper
and
Ethel
Smith.This
paper
challenges
this
invisibility
through
a
discussion
of
two
art
works
made
in
response
to
the
Vera
‘Jack’
Holmes
archival
collection
at
The
Women’s
Library
(LSE).
Vera
was
a
suffragette,
actress,
chauffeuse
to
the
Pankhurst’s,
ambulance
driver,
prisoner
of
war
and
aid
worker
alongside
her
partner
Evelina
Haverfield.
The
archive
holds
an
inventory
of
their
home
that
includes
a
wooden
bed
with
their
initials
hand
carved
on
the
end.
Through
the
patchwork
quilt
and
embroidered
table
cloth
this
small,
domestic
act
of
visibility
is
re-‐imagined
in
stitch
as
a
memorial
to
lesbian
love,
longing
and
remembrance.
Just
as
lesbians
have
been
marginalized
in
mainstream
history,
textiles
have
been
dismissed
from
the
cannon
of
high
art
due
to
the
associations
with
women’s
work,
domesticity
and
traditional
notions
of
femininity.
It
is
this
history
of
gendered
dismissal,
and
injury
that
makes
textiles
such
a
powerful
method
for
challenging
historical
lesbian
erasure.
Through
embroidery
these
works
begin
to
stitch
the
importance
of
lesbian
relationships,
alliances
and
narratives
back
into
the
fabric
of
suffrage
history
and
memory.
Title: Queering the female Gaze: Re-‐examining the invisibility of lesbian artists’
Abstract:
I
will
discuss
hidden
narratives
in
works
of
women
by
women,
and
talk
about
them
in
relation
to
my
own
practice.
Taking
an
intersectional
approach,
it
is
important
to
look
at
specifically
artists
of
colour
11
whose
work
is
explicitly
or
implicitly
queer,
and
has
been
overlooked
where
other
factors
such
as
their
gender
or
race
dominates
the
discussion
around
their
work.
There
is
a
distinct
lack
of
queer
imagery
by
queer
artists
in
the
dominant
history
of
western
Art,
and
I
will
be
examining
how
these
images
have
been
overlooked
or
discussed
in
a
different
context.
I
will
be
focusing
mainly
on
Mickalene
Thomas,
Lubaina
Himid,
Laura
Knight,
and
Ghada
Amer.
Furthermore,
I
will
show
images
of
my
work
and
give
a
little
background
about
me;
I
am
a
lesbian
painter
of
colour,
born
in
London
and
living
in
Brighton.
My
work
explores
sexuality,
sensuality
and
intimacy
between
women,
and
how
queer
people
have
been
or
are
restricted
to
the
domestic
sphere
and
how
this
impacts
on
their
relationship
with
themselves
and
their
bodies.
Title: Boundary-‐making and the Management of Visibility: Lesbian lives in Seoul, South Korea
Abstract:
This
paper
explores
the
boundary-‐making
practices
of
many
Korean
lesbians,
understanding
them
as
strategies
to
create
‘lesbian
space’
separate
from
male-‐dominated,
heterosexual,
Korean
society,
and
to
reduce
the
risk
of
being
outed
publicly.
I
address
the
question
of
why
these
spaces
exclude
heterosexual
men
and
woman,
homosexual
men
and
are
suspicious
of
female
bisexuals
and
gender
non-‐conforming
individuals,
arguing
that
this
boundary
making
allows
for
the
protection
and
construction
of
lesbian
subjectivity
in
the
context
of
a
Korean
militarised
patriarchal
state,
where
men
dominate
cultural
and
political
positions
of
authority
(Moon
2005).
Drawing
upon
anthropologist
Mary
Douglas's
theory
of
pollution
as
expulsion
of
“matter
out
of
place",
I
analyse
the
productive
function
of
the
exclusionary
strategies
women
use
to
maintain
lesbian
spaces
(1966:3).
The
exclusion
of
the
straight
male
figure
serves
to
reduce
ambiguity
and
danger
in
the
lives
of
my
informants,
while
also
allowing
for
the
personal
management
of
visibility.
I
draw
upon
ethnographic
research
conducted
in
Seoul,
South
Korea
in
2017
to
analyse
how
women
subvert
state
instruments
of
control
to
create
boundaries
around
lesbian
space,
attempting
to
prevent
the
dangers
of
masculine
pollution
(Foucault
1978;
1991).
This
illustrates
Elizabeth
Povinelli’s
theory
of
how
recognition,
camouflage
and
espionage
are
used
by
marginalized
individuals
to
persevere
within
an
increasingly
neoliberal
and
securitized
Korean
state
(2011:190).
I
examine
the
politics
of
boundary-‐
making
to
reduce
ambiguity
and
masculinized
danger
in
four
lesbian
spaces:
Bar
Kwan,
Come
Together,
the
online
forum
Lnet,
and
the
Seoul
Queer
Culture
Festival.
Exploring
decisions
individual
lesbian
women
make
that
seem
counterintuitive
to
a
western
LGBT
framework
that
enforces
unified
diversity
and
inclusivity;
this
works
to
centre
queer
female
experience
in
non-‐Western
contexts,
disturbing
the
focal
point
of
Western
gay
men
in
LGBTQ+
studies.
Abstract:
After
interviewing
older
lesbians
in
Toronto,
Canada
and
Brighton,
UK
and
analysing
their
experiences
of
aging,
I
have
learned
about
aging
on
multiple
levels.
I
have
learned
that
family,
year
and
age
of
coming-‐out
and
race,
cultural,
religious,
geographic
and
class
dimensions
all
have
12
profound
influences
on
aging.
I
have
also
learned
that
there
are
many
similarities
between
the
wider
population
and
lesbians.
My
intention
is
to
focus
on
the
particular
aspects
that
arise
from
being
lesbian.
In
order
to
tease
out
this
aspect
more,
I
have
begun
a
photovoice
project.
This
integrates
experience
as
articulated
through
the
camera
lens
by
either
putting
a
camera
in
the
hands
of
the
participant,
or
‘community
researcher,’
or
journeying
with
the
CR
and
taking
photos
with
her
direction.
Women
are
asked
to
locate
images
that
reflect
their
sense
of
aging.
This
methodology
has
proven
successful
as
a
way
to
specifically
drill
down
into
experience
that
doesn’t
solely
rely
on
written
or
spoken
words
and
the
academic
researcher
as
the
authority.
It
shifts
the
power
balance
and
allows
for
rich
narratives
to
emerge.
In
this
presentation,
I
will
discuss
the
methodology
of
photovoice
(Manasia,
2017)
and
briefly
reference
some
of
the
narratives
that
develop
from
the
images
the
women
have
shared.
Drawing
on
semiotics
studies
(ex.
Barthes,
Maasik,
Solomon,
Saussure)
I
look
at
how
‘signs
and
signifiers’
of
aging
lesbians
tell
the
women’s
stories.
In
this
way,
the
aim
is
to
make
what
is
often
invisible,
visible.
Signs
often
conceal
some
interest
or
other,
whether
political
or
commercial,
and
their
proliferation
makes
it
necessary
to
decode
the
meanings
behind
them.
Thus,
the
use
of
semiotics
is
not
intended
for
just
individual
reflection,
it
is
equally
a
study
of
ideology
and
power.
13
Abstract:
Symbolic
annihilation”
is
a
term
first
used
by
Gaye
Tuchman
(1978),
but
mobilized
by
Sheena
Howard
(2014)
in
her
research
about
Black
lesbians,
that
refers
to
the
social
phenomenon
of
media
underrepresentation
or
near
total
absence
of
representation
whereby
the
mass
omission,
trivialization,
and
condemnation
of
certain
groups
in
media
relays
the
group's
societal
value.
Black
lesbian
symbolic
annihilation
is
a
term
I
mobilize
in
my
work
to
consider
more
fully
how
black
lesbian
symbolic
annihilation
is
a
colonial,
historical-‐material,
philosophical
and
socio-‐cultural
construction
that
secures
the
status
quo
and
the
Grammars
of
Blackness,
which
is
reproduced
in
society
via
discourse,
intellectual
genealogies,
culture,
and
representation.
“Southern
horrors”
and
the
historical
genealogical
“problematic
of
silence”
around
articulating
black
queer
female
sexuality
and
lived
experience
in
archives,
discourse,
and
theory
are
well
documented
in
scholarship.
My
work
interrupts
protracted
legacies
of
colonial
slavery's
impact
on
Black
Southern
lesbian
and
queer
women
today-‐namely
uninterrupted
patterns
of
epistemological
erasure;
and
intersectional
spatialized,
racialized-‐gendered,
sexual,
homophobic,
classist
violence
within
symbolic
and
material
home
spaces-‐through
studying
the
rival
geographies
and
alternative
economies
they
create
and
deploy
for
belonging
and
crevices
of
power.
Renouncing
respectable
politics,
methods
of
inquiry,
and
of
codifying
archives,
this
paper
considers
ethnography
of
Black
Southern
lesbian
pride
spaces
and
VH1's
Love
and
Hip
Hop
Atlanta
and
Miamito
illuminate
how
the
Hip
Hop
South
and
its
music,
entertainment,
and
sexual
economy
fosters
a
contemporary
counter-‐culture
and
interstitial
black
queer
sexual
geographies
where
decolonial
gestures
such
as
funky
love
(Stallings
2015),
sacred
secularity,
the
representation
of
Black
queer/lesbian
relationships,
and
Black
queer/lesbian
femme
crevices
of
power
(McKittrick
2006),
pleasure,
and
play
appear
in
the
context
of
the
U.S.
South's
quare
gender
and
sexual
politics.
Institution/Affiliation: Fellow and Director of Studies in English at St Catharine’s College, Cambridge.
Title: Queer visions: lesbians in the archive and the politics of (in)visibility
Abstract:
For
the
sculptor
Anne
Damer
(1748-‐1828),
public
visibility
was
a
complicated
and
sometimes
dangerous
affair.
As
Andrew
Elfenbein
suggests,
her
status
as
an
aristocrat
and
her
self-‐presentation
as
an
artist,
in
an
unusual
medium
for
a
woman,
both
exposed
her
to
attack
and
in
some
ways
protected
her
from
it.
For
much
of
Damer’s
life,
Emma
Donoghue
has
argued,
she
was
“haunted
…
by
the
social
identity
of
being
a
woman
who
desired
other
women.”
One
of
her
contemporaries
described
Damer
as
“a
lady
much
suspected
for
liking
her
own
sex
in
a
criminal
way”,
noting
that
“'Tis
a
joke
in
London
now
to
say
such
a
one
visits
Mrs
Damer.”
As
Donoghue
notes,
Damer
was
seen
not
just
as
a
Sapphist
but
as
“the
epitome
of
Sapphism”;
her
hyper
visibility
in
the
role
means
that
those
who
visit
her
are
queered
by
association.
Damer’s
private
self
is
more
difficult
to
interpret,
not
least
because
almost
all
of
her
papers
were
destroyed
after
her
death
at
her
request.
One
of
the
few
pieces
of
evidence
to
survive
is
a
series
of
four
notebooks
recording
Damer’s
close
relationship
in
the
1790s
with
her
last
attachment,
Mary
Berry.
This
paper
explores
what
the
notebooks
make
visible
as
they
frame
or
intersperse
extracts
from
Berry’s
letters
with
quotations
from
Greek
and
Latin
literature.
While
Alison
Yarrington
has
14
noted
the
importance
of
classical
models
to
Damer’s
public
image
and
her
work
as
a
sculptor,
little
attention
has
been
paid
to
Damer’s
private
engagement
with
the
Classics.
A
place
of
refuge
and
resistance,
the
Classics
enable
Damer’s
construction
of
a
private
identity,
and
provide
a
way
of
envisioning
intimate
friendship
and
same-‐sex
love.
Title: Making work visible: Wages Due Lesbians and the labour of queer life
Abstract:
This
paper
explores
the
queer
politics
of
emotional
and
sexual
labour,
through
the
practice
and
writings
of
the
activist
group
Wages
Due
Lesbians
(WDL).
The
group
was
part
of
the
international
Wages
for
Housework
campaign,
a
political
movement
which
centred
on
feminised
work.
WDL
had
a
pivotal
role
in
the
campaign,
as
their
refusal
of
sexual
and
emotional
relationships
with
men
prefigured
the
strategy
of
the
movement
as
a
whole.
WDL
practices
redefined
the
theme
of
visibility
within
LGBT
politics.
What
they
wanted
to
make
visible
were
not
queer
individuals
per
se,
but
rather
the
material
conditions
of
lesbian
lives.
While
lesbian
women
can
refuse
certain
forms
of
labour,
in
particular
the
emotional
and
sexual
labour
that
heterosexual
women
perform
for
their
male
partners,
the
lived
reality
of
lesbians
calls
for
other
forms
of
labour.
In
particular,
lesbians
work
to
build
alternative
forms
of
sociality
in
the
face
of
a
hostile
society.
This
work,
WDL
argued,
is
often
invisible
in
both
feminist
and
LGBT
movements.
Through
calling
for
a
wage
for
this
work,
WDL
strived
to
highlight
both
the
utopian
potentials
and
daily
struggles
of
lesbian
life.
In
making
visible
the
everyday
material
practices
of
lesbianism,
WDL
also
wished
to
emphasise
the
class-‐differentiated
conditions
of
queerness.
Striving
to
make
lesbian
politics
discernible
as
part
of
a
broad
working-‐class
struggle,
they
were
persistently
critical
both
of
bourgeois
gay
politics
and
leftist
movements
that
neglected
issues
around
sexuality.
Their
politics
of
visibility,
then,
aimed
to
politicise
the
everyday
and
create
the
potential
for
new
forms
of
sociality.
Institution/Affiliation:
Programme
Director,
BA
(Hons)
in
Applied
Music
/
Lecturer
in
Music
Dundalk
Institute
of
Technology
Abstract:
In
1992
the
pop-‐jazz
duo
Zrazy,
vocalist
Maria
Walsh
and
saxophonist
and
pianist
Carole
Nelson,
emerged
on
the
Irish
popular
music
scene
with
the
release
of
their
first
album
Give
it
all
Up.
Importantly,
from
the
outset,
Walsh
and
Nelson
decided
that
they
would
be
out
as
lesbians,
a
brave
and
bold
political
move
in
a
conservative
period
of
Irish
history
characterised
by
Catholic
hegemony,
and
in
which
homosexuality
was
still
illegal.
They
are
icons
for
many
lesbian
women,
particularly
those
who
grew
up
in
Ireland
at
a
time
when
the
sexual
identity
of
lesbian
was
shrouded
in
shame
and
secrecy.
Songs
such
as
'Come
Out
Everybody'
(1997)
and
'You
Make
Me
Happy'
(2015)
address
15
LGBTQ+
themes
and
the
duo
have
won
awards
recognising
their
contribution
to
LGBTQ+
cultural
life,
including
an
Out
Music
Award
and
a
Gay
and
Lesbian
Music
Award
(GLAMA).
Zrazy
stand
out
amongst
their
peers
in
their
consistent
commitment
to
making
explicitly
lesbian
feminist
art
and
they
are
a
rare
Irish
example
of
"women's
music"
-‐
a
musical
genre
that
emerged
in
the
1970s
as
a
cultural
manifestation
of
second-‐wave
feminism
and
the
women's
liberation
movement
in
the
United
States.
Over
the
course
of
their
twenty-‐six
year
long
career
their
musical
output
has
engaged
in
a
range
of
Irish
socio-‐cultural
debates,
from
the
abortion
referendums
in
the
1990s
and
2010s
to
the
role
of
women
in
the
1916
Easter
Rising.
Ahmed
argues
that
lesbian
and
radical
feminist
politics
are
characterised
by
'wilfulness'
defined
by
the
acts
of
standing
against
and
as
creativity
(Ahmed,
2017).
This
research
explores
Zrazy's
lesbian
feminist
art
as
a
site
of
activism
and
protest
and
investigates
how
they
have
used
their
unique
position,
their
visible
position,
in
a
period
of
almost
complete
invisibility
to
engage
in
a
variety
of
cultural
battles
for
women's
rights
in
Ireland.
Affiliation/
Institution:
Lecturer
in
English
Language
and
Linguistics,
School
of
English,
University
of
Sussex
Abstract:
Lesbian
identities
have
tended
to
be
invisible
in
the
linguistic
study
of
the
sociophonetics
of
sexuality.
This
has
partly
been
because
of
the
high
social
salience
associated
with
‘gay-‐sounding’
men,
but
also
arguably
because
there
are
qualitative
differences
in
the
tensions
that
exist
between
gay
and
heteronormative
masculinities,
and
those
that
exist
between
lesbians
and
heteronormative
femininities
(Zwicky
1997;
Cameron
2011).
New
Zealand
presents
an
interesting
case
study
to
examine
the
sociophonetic
landscape
of
gender
and
sexuality
in
a
context
where
an
oppositional
relationship
has
existed
between
normative
and
non-‐normative
femininities.
Homosexuality
was
decriminalised
in
New
Zealand
in
1986,
and
although
most
of
the
legal/moral
debate
was
focused
on
men,
the
national
discussion
also
drew
attention
to
non-‐heterosexual
femininities,
foregrounding
sexuality
as
a
socially
relevant
and
politicised
dimension
of
womanhood
in
New
Zealand.
Post
law
reform,
social
attitudes
have
shifted
dramatically
and
rapidly
towards
the
mainstreaming
of
non-‐heteronormativities,
at
least
in
urban
centres.
This
project
draws
on
two
age
groups
of
New
Zealanders
in
Auckland:
an
older
cohort
who
came
of
age
at
a
time
of
criminalised
homosexuality,
and
a
younger
cohort
who
have
grown
up
in
an
environment
more
broadly
supportive
of
queer
identities.
This
paper
considers
the
social
use
of
linguistic
cues
associated
with
lesbian-‐identified
women
in
the
specific
context
of
social
reform
in
New
Zealand.
Differences
between
lesbians
and
straight
women
in
the
older
age
cohort
are
found
in
three
vowels
of
New
Zealand
English,
which
are
not
salient
enough
to
be
perceived
as
stereotypes
but
nevertheless
seem
to
index
sexuality
(see
e.g.
Pierrehumbert
et
al.
2004).
Interestingly,
these
differences
are
neutralised
among
younger
speakers,
suggesting
that
the
rapidly-‐diffusing
social
changes
that
swept
New
Zealand
in
the
mid-‐1980s
have
had
an
observable
impact
on
the
linguistic
resources
available
for
signalling
affiliation
and
identity
within
a
speech
community.
16
Institution/Affiliation:
Research
and
Teaching
Fellow
in
Sociology
at
the
University
of
Sussex.
Title:
‘Here,
I
have
no
choice’:
being
a
lesbian
and
a
refugee
–Intersectional
experiences
of
time
and
space
Abstract:
Whilst
Europe
is
proud
of
its
record
on
LGBTQI*
rights
and
presents
itself
as
a
haven
for
LGBTQI*
people,
the
situation
of
individuals
who
seek
international
protection
on
grounds
of
sexual
orientation
and/or
gender
identity
looks
rather
bleak.
Not
only
has
the
‘welcome
culture’
(in
Germany,
for
instance)
been
replaced
with
right-‐wing
rhetoric
and
the
closure
of
European
borders,
but
LGBTQI*
refugees
also
face
additional
issues
such
as
the
impossibility
of
proving
their
‘gayness’
and
social
isolation,
especially
when
their
claim
is
refused.
However,
these
experiences
are
not
homogenous.
The
‘stereotypical’
refugee
is
young,
male
and
cis-‐gendered,
and
often
LGBTQI*
refugee
support
groups
cater
most
for
cis-‐male
gay
refugees.
The
experiences
of
lesbian
(and
bi
and
trans)
refugees
often
remain
invisible.
In
this
paper,
I
will
draw
on
the
ERC-‐funded
project
SOGICA
–
Sexual
Orientation
and
Gender
Identity
Claims
of
Asylum
(www.sogica.org),
which
explores
the
social
and
legal
experiences
of
LGBTQI*
in
Germany,
Italy
and
the
UK
(and
beyond).
I
will
specifically
focus
on
the
intersectional
experiences
of
lesbian
refugees
in
Germany
and
explore
how
these
experiences
are
not
only
shaped
by
sexuality,
gender,
‘race’,
religion,
age
and
class
but
furthermore
by
being
‘marked’
as
a
refugee.
As
I
will
demonstrate,
being
a
lesbian
refugee
constitutes
the
experiences
of
time
and
space
in
particular
ways.
Institution/Affiliation:
MSc
student
in
Women’s
Studies
at
the
University
of
Oxford
and
a
2018
Rhodes
Scholar.
Title: Non-‐Binary Lesbians: Rediscovering Lesbian Specificity in ‘The Moment of Trans’
Abstract:
How
is
lesbian
specificity
being
rearticulated
in
and
through
a
moment
of
undeniably
heightened
transgender
visibility?
In
the
past
two
decades,
transgender
identifications
have
notably
increased.
Non-‐binary
gender
identities
have
emerged
as
a
form
of
hybrid
queer-‐trans
subjectivity
(including,
sometimes
only
discursively,
a
movement
away
from
an
initial
gender
assignment).
The
popularity
of
“non-‐binary”
for
younger
generations
echoes
some
of
the
historical
tensions
between
lesbian
and
transmasculine
identities,
as
the
particularly
and
politically
‘queer’
openness
of
the
category
seems
to
refute
the
need
for
a
sexual
identity
based
on
gender.
However,
“non-‐binary
lesbian”
has
more
recently
been
gaining
traction
as
an
identity
label,
suggesting
that
there
is
something
about
lesbian
specificity
that
contemporary
queer
gender
identities
cannot
fully
capture.
Besides
marking
an
important
reconstitution
of
lesbian
as
an
identity,
I
argue
that
how
“lesbian”
is
being
chosen
to
match
and
supplement
“non-‐binary”
will
increase
the
visibility
of
“lesbian”
as
a
richly
specific
but
non-‐essentialized
identity,
refuting
past
accusations
of
narrowness.
17
Non-‐binary
lesbian
identity
(somewhat
contentiously)
suggests
that
what
some
people
experience
as
lesbian
specificity
is
separable
from
womanhood.
This
both
distances
lesbian
identity
from
a
fraught
essentialist
politic
and
demands
a
new
definition
of
lesbian
specificity
rooted
in
relationality
rather
than
internality.
Re-‐reading
lesbian
relationality
through
a
post-‐structuralist
foundation
of
anti-‐
essentialism,
this
paper
will
examine
why
“lesbian”
is
still
a
necessary
identity
in
the
“moment
of
trans,”
and
will
demonstrate
that
rather
than
being
lost
to
either
the
openness
of
queer
or
the
gender
politics
of
transition,
lesbianism
can
find
a
new
expansive
expression
in
the
intersubjective
spaces
left
unfilled.
Non-‐binary
lesbians
may
expose
a
lesbian
specificity
that
honours
rich
veins
of
history
and
feeling
while
taking
a
trans
ethos
as
foundational,
reiterating
lesbianism
in
a
form
primed
for
21st
century
gender
politics.
Abstract:
In
this
multimedia
presentation
we
use
live
theatre,
slides
and
music
to
ask
how
a
female
couple
in
the
late
18th
century
manipulated
the
in/visibility
of
their
relationship–
and
how
later
commentators
made
them
more
visible.
We
are
Living
Histories
Cymru,
creating
theatre
from
the
queer
histories
of
Wales.
Jane
Hoy
was
previously
a
lecturer
in
adult
learning
at
Birkbeck,
University
of
London.
She
now
lives
in
Mid
Wales
where
she
is
involved
in
lesbian
history
and
participatory
theatre.
She
and
her
partner,
Helen
Sandler,
organise
Aberration,
an
LGBT+
arts
night
in
Aberystwyth.
Helen
is
a
writer
and
editor
who
also
runs
Tollington
Press.
The
presentation
expands
on
our
latest
theatre
project,
An
Extraordinary
Female
Affection,
about
Eleanor
Butler
and
Sarah
Ponsonby
–the
Ladies
of
Llangollen.
They
were
two
upper
-‐class
Irish
women
who
eloped
in
1788
and
settled
in
North
Wales.
Travellers
came
from
far
and
wide
to
gaze
at
the
two
women
And
their
picturesque
cottage
and
gardens.
We
will
move
beyond
our
usual
show
to
explore
the
impact
Eleanor
and
Sarah’s
50
-‐
year
relationship
had
on
‘women
loving
women’
of
the
time.
Anne
Lister
of
Shibden
Hall
wrote
about
them
in
her
diaries;
others
sent
letters,
poems...
and
a
cow.
But
the
Ladies
were
disturbed
by
correspondence
from
random
sapphists
and
newspaper
slander.
We
will
use
extracts
from
our
show
and
other
sources
to
ask
how
they
survived
in
the
public
eye
while
avoiding
disgrace.
From
Colette’s
musings
and
Elizabeth
Mavor’s
biography,
through
the
‘sex
wars’
of
the
80s,
the
Ladies
have
lived
on
as
a
symbol;
their
house
is
a
venue
for
same
sex
weddings.
We
will
invite
delegates
to
explore
the
fantasies
and
friendships
–and
what
they
teach
us
about
in/visibility
.
Institution/Affiliation: PhD researcher in Sociology at the University of Surrey
18
Abstract:
This
research
project
is
inclusive
of
the
participant’s
voice,
keeping
LGBTQ+
experiences
at
the
centre
of
the
research.
The
research
focusses
on
the
intersections
of
age,
class,
disability,
sexuality,
mental
wellbeing,
and
rurality,
and
the
impact
of
these
on
participants’
experiences
of
coming
out.
The
methods
consisted
of
six
semi-‐structured
interviews,
where
an
inductive
approach
was
used
to
ensure
the
data
collected
and
analysed
was
what
directed
the
project.
Through
thematic
analysis
of
the
transcripts,
three
themes
were
produced:
coming-‐out,
the
community
and
LGBTQ+
individuals’
uses
of
technology.
For
this
paper,
the
participants’
experiences
of
coming-‐out
provide
insight
into
the
psychological
stress
and
familial
reactions
of
the
participants.
Five
out
of
six
participants
experienced
psychological
stress
due
to
coming
out;
this
ranged
from
anxiety
about
familial/friend
reactions
to
suicidal
thoughts.
The
participants’
views
of
whether
coming
out
had
a
positive
or
negative
effect
on
them,
was
positive
overall.
The
participants
did
not
view
coming
out
as
part
of
the
process
of
joining
the
LGBTQ+
community,
as
only
one
in
six
felt
part
of
the
LGBTQ+
community.
Intersectionality
is
integral
in
understanding
participants’
experiences
of
coming
out.
Overall,
the
psychological
stress
of
coming
out
was
examined
in
detail,
and
how
participants
felt
about
themselves
pre
and
post
coming
out
were
highlighted.
There
is
a
need
for
further
intersectional
LGBTQ+
research
that
is
focussed
on
the
participants’
experiences.
For
future
research,
I
am
exploring
LGBTQ+
individuals’
uses
of
dating/hook
up
apps.
This
research
will
provide
further
intersectional
analyses
and
keep
the
participant
at
its
core.
Abstract:
I
am
a
lesbian
in
my
50s
living
in
West
Yorkshire,
my
political
activism
since
my
teens
has
been
in
defence
of
women’s
rights
and
LGBT
equalities.
This
is
a
screening
of
a
collaborative
film
(31min)
by
myself
and
Amanda
Russell
who
was
a
manager
of
London
bookshop
“Gay’s
the
Word”
in
the
1980’s.
In
interview
format
we
share
specific
details
of
what
it
was
like
for
Amanda
who
is
a
lesbian
in
her
60s
coming
out
in
the
1970s,
the
discrimination
and
events
which
led
to
a
raid
in
the
early
1980’s
by
HM
Customs
and
Excise
on
‘Gay’s
the
Word’
Bookshop,
and
also
the
searching
of
her
own
home.
Prior
to
the
recording
of
these
interviews,
full
details
of
the
experience
and
the
impact
of
the
raid
remained
an
untold
story,
which
is
a
significant
part
of
hidden
LGBT
history.
Amanda's
role
as
manager
of
the
bookshop
at
the
time
put
her
in
the
position
of
potentially
appearing
at
the
Old
Bailey
on
charges
of
fraud
and
the
importation
of
obscene
material.
The
case
was
dropped
just
prior
to
being
fought
but
not
before
she
was
questioned
for
several
hours,
had
her
home
searched
and
was
harassed
by
customs
officers
for
several
months.
Her
experience
was
also
a
key
part
of
the
introduction
of
Section
28
as
she
was
the
person
who,
at
their
request,
deposited
the
title
'Jenny
lives
with
Eric
and
Martin'
into
the
school’s
library
for
material
showing
positive
images
of
young
people
and
homosexuality.
The
visibility
of
her
activism
in
setting
up
the
Lesbian
Discussion
Group
and
the
facilitation
of
other
meetings
at
the
bookshop
was
entirely
omitted
from
the
2004
film
Pride.
The
reasons
for
this
are
unclear
but
raise
a
question
about
lesbian
visibility,
which
elements
of
her
story
demonstrate.
19
Title:
“(In)visible
homoerotic
practices
of
Greek
women:
(Im)possible
relationships
or
strategic
practices”?
Abstract:
Due
to
the
accrued
importance
of
family,
marriage,
and
motherhood
within
contemporary
Greek
society,
most
scholarly
works
on
lesbian
lives
focus
predominantly
on
invisibility,
unintelligibility,
and
absence.
However,
Greek
homoerotic
women,
more
or
less
visible
within
their
families
of
origin
and
their
workplaces,
do
engage
in
lesbian
relationships
and
live
with
their
female
partners.
Situated
in
a
‘grey
zone’
of
visible
and
invisible
desires
within
the
social
worlds
of
the
family
and
work,
Greek
lesbians
gauge
potential
reactions
within
their
families
and
their
workplaces
and
effectively
create
boundaries
between
themselves
and
the
homophobic
world,
while
at
the
same
time
they
create
new
arenas
of
recognition.
Based
on
life
narratives
of
urban
Greek
women
in
their
early
thirties,
who
engage
in
lesbian
practices
and
cohabit
with
their
partners,
this
paper
explores
the
meanings
of
visibility
and
invisibility
of
lesbianism
through
these
women’s
discourses,
experiences,
and
perspectives.
More
specifically,
it
examines
the
multiple
ways
in
which
homoerotic
Greek
women
perform
lesbianism,
reconstruct
their
subjectivities
and
renegotiate
their
everyday
lives.
How
do
they
deal
with
family
(of
origin)
expectations
and
what
meanings
do
they
make
out
of
their
“new”
(chosen)
families?
How
do
they
negotiate
their
position
in
the
(usually
homophobic
and
heteronormative)
workplace?
This
paper
challenges
the
predominant
victimising
notion
of
the
invisibility
of
lesbianism
and
analyses
it
as
something
that
is
partly
hidden
from
view
and
intentionally
“encrypted”,
making
difficult
to
interpret
and
decipher
its
multiple
meanings.
As
it
is
furthermore
suggested,
this
hidden
and
(often)
invisible
practice
could
be
considered
as
a
deliberate
strategy
and
as
an
act
of
resilience,
aimed
at
challenging
an
intrusive,
hegemonic
social
gaze
that
seeks
to
re-‐inscribe
the
subject
exclusively
within
the
confines
of
heteronormative
parameters
of
an
existing
system
of
power/knowledge.
Title:
Lesbian
(In)Visibility
in
Manchester:
How
socio-‐cultural
factors
influence
lesbian
visibility
in
LGBTQ
spaces
Abstract:
This
paper
explores
the
idea
of
lesbian
visibility
in
LGBTQ
social
spaces
by
discussing
how
lesbians
in
Manchester
experience
inclusion,
exclusion
and
a
sense
of
belonging
in
the
city’s
LGBTQ
social
scene.
Lesbians are often labelled “invisible” due to the small presence the collective has on the scene.
20
Lesbian
invisibility
has
previously
been
explained
by
the
decline
of
lesbian
spaces
and
the
dominating
presence
of
predominately
white,
cis,
young,
able
-‐bodied
gay
men
in
commercial
LGBTQ
areas.
Since
the
scene
is
the
most
visible
space
for
LGBTQ
identities
(Formby,
2017),
gay
men
are
arguably
the
most
recognised
identity.
This
visibility
provides
gay
men
collectives
with
a
lot
of
influence
that
inevitably
marginalises
other
LGBTQ
members,
including
lesbians.
This
paper
provides
a
standpoint
about
lesbian
visibility
from
the
viewpoint
of
lesbians
and
bisexual
women,
via
focus
groups
and
interviews
with
research
participants
who
have
experiences
in
Manchester’s
commercial
and
non-‐
commercial
LGBTQ
spaces.
The
se
interviews
explore
the
participants’
perspective
of
Manchester’s
commercialised
gay
village
and
the
last
lesbian
bar
in
the
village.
Although
most
participants
are
happy
that
the
village
exists,
many
expressed
feelings
of
exclusion
from
the
space
due
to
intersecting
socio-‐cultural
factors,
such
as
gender,
race,
age,
and
sexuality.
Due
to
these
experiences
many
participants
attend
and
create
non-‐commercial
LGBTQ
spaces
that
they
find
more
diverse,
inclusive,
and
women-‐focused.
This
demonstrates
how
lesbians
in
Manchester
navigate
commercial
and
non-‐commercial
spaces
to
make
their
identity
visible
and
seek
a
sense
of
belonging
in
women-‐centred
spaces.
Furthermore,
this
paper
illustrates
a
tension
between
lesbians’
reputation
and
feelings
of
being
invisible
and
their
desire
to
be
visible
via
accessing
and
creating
lesbian-‐focused
spaces.
This
tension
indicates
a
level
of
complexity
in
the
politics
of
lesbian
(in)visibility
that
this
paper
tries
to
address.
Title:
“I
kissed
a
Girl
and
I
liked
it”:
Navigating
through
Cis-‐Gender
Female
Subjective
Experiences
and
Pop-‐Song
Representation
of
the
‘Heteroflexible
Discourse’.
Abstract:
Proposal:
I
began
this
research
by
interviewing
12
cis-‐gender
women,
between
the
ages
of
20-‐29
on
their
own
subjective
experiences
of
sexuality
in
contemporary
Britain.
From
listening
to
these
interviews,
I
discovered
unexpected
prominent
narrative
which
ran
through
each
interview
in
some
form.
This
was
that
each
female
regarded
their
sexuality
as
heterosexual;
yet
they,
on
some
level,
had
experienced
a
sexual
experience
with
another
female.
As
well
as
the
interviews;
I
began
to
look
outwards
at
mainstream
societal
representations
of
this
phenomena.
This
drew
me
to
look
at
pop-‐
songs,
and
their
music
videos.
The
two
songs
I
chose
were
‘I
Kissed
a
Girl’
by
Katy
Perry
(2008)
and
‘Girls’
by
Rita
Ora
(2018).
A
subsequent
literature
review
convinced
me
there
had
been
no
previous
research
on
regarding
‘heteroflexibility’
as
a
discourse
or
investigating
the
phenomenon
from
the
representations
of
contemporary
popular
music.
Furthermore,
the
form
of
sociological
post-‐
structuralist
feminist
analysis
I
have
applied
was
scarce
within
existing
literature
on
the
subject.
The
analysis
of
my
research
resulted
in
similar
outcomes
on
two
levels;
mainstream
cultural
representation
and
subjective
experience.
This
‘heteroflexible
discourse’
demonstrated
practically
identical
privileged
ideologies
of
the
heteronormative
narrative,
which
reflected
this
‘new
sexually
liberated
female’.
This
form
of
liberation
I
suggest,
is
in
fact,
just
a
representation
of
the
shift
that
society
deems
more
socially
acceptable
for
heterosexual
women.
Though
seen
as
a
form
of
progressive
female
sexual
behaviour,
it
can
only
be
accessed
by
a
certain
privileged
individual,
21
creating
further
sexual
hierarchies
which
are
less
likely
to
be
so
‘obvious’.
Coupled
with
this,
the
cultural
representations
show
a
lack
of
diversity
when
it
comes
to
other
forms
lesbianism,
sexuality
narratives
and
femininity.
Author’s
Name(s):
Professor
Catherine
Meads
Institution/Affiliation:
Professor
of
Health,
Faculty
of
Health,
Education,
Medicine
and
Social
Care,
Anglia
Ruskin
University
Title:
The
invisibility
of
lesbians,
bisexual
women
and
women
who
have
sex
with
women
in
health
research
Abstract:
There
is
considerable
invisibility
in
research
on
the
health
of
sexual
minorities,
particularly
women.
This
has
had
multiple
and
profound
impacts.
One
example
is
the
lack
of
information
on
the
sexual
health
of
UK
sexual
minority
women.
For
many
years
the
Korner
Returns
from
UK
sexual
health
clinics
recorded
heterosexual
men,
men
who
have
sex
with
men,
and
women.
There
was
no
differentiation
into
women
who
have
sex
with
women
and
women
who
have
sex
with
men.
So
how
the
statistics
were
collected
meant
that
there
was
no
information
available.
It
is
unclear
why
this
was
set
up
in
this
way
but
gives
the
message
that
sexual
minority
women’s
sexual
health
is
not
important,
or
same
as
heterosexual
women’s
health,
or
not
worth
collecting.
Public
Health
England
have
only
just
realised
that
they
need
to
collect
sexual
health
information
for
women
by
sexual
orientation.
Another
example
is
where
physical
health
condition
prevalence
has
not
been
investigated
by
sexual
orientation.
A
recent
publication
by
Meads
and
colleagues
(2018)
showed
that
there
are
higher
rates
of
asthma
but
not
cardiovascular
disease
in
sexual
minority
women.
Why
this
is
so
is
very
unclear
but
warrants
further
investigation.
Also,
it
is
important
to
note
as
to
why
it
has
taken
so
long
to
discover
this.
The
recent
action
by
the
US
government
to
cancel
recording
of
sexual
orientation
in
government-‐collected
statistics
means
that
important
health-‐related
information
about
prevalence
rates
and
other
useful
data
will
be
rendered
invisible
again.
This
presentation
will
outline
a
number
of
areas
where
sexual
minority
women’s
health
has
been
rendered
invisible
or
less
visible,
the
implications
for
sexual
minority
women
and
health
professionals,
and
offer
some
suggestions
as
to
how
this
can
be
reversed.
Title: Walking Lesbian Flags: the re-‐appropriation of pink within queer femininities
Abstract:
Pink
is
a
colour
heavy
with
associations
of
heterosexual
femininity.
It
has
been
seen
as
oppressive;
campaigns
such
as
Pink
Stinks
have
warned
of
the
damage
it
does
to
women
and
girls,
while
gendered
branding
has
exploited
pink
to
produce
stereotyped
gender
differences
for
the
capitalist
market.
When
associated
with
homosexuality,
pink
has
settled
only
in
male
spaces,
with
divisions
between
its
meanings
within
different
areas
of
the
LGBTQ
community.
22
Recent
studies
such
as
the
Museum
at
FIT’s
2018
exhibition
Pink:
The
History
of
a
Punk,
Pretty,
Powerful
Colour
have
brought
pink
into
the
limelight
as
a
colour
with
a
distinctive
voice.
However,
the
role
of
pink
within
the
women-‐loving-‐women
community
is
one
which
is
thriving
and
subverting
the
power
relations
of
femininity
in
the
brightest
sartorial
way.
This
paper
aims
to
present
the
potential
of
pink
as
a
symbolic
means
for
lesbian
and
queer
women
to
distort
a
patriarchal
devaluing
of
femininity.
It
will
explain,
from
a
fashion
history
perspective,
the
visibility
politics
of
performative
acts
of
hyperfemininity.
Through
interviews
that
I
have
conducted
with
a
selection
of
young
queer
women
who
proudly
dress
in
predominantly
pink
styles,
and
an
analysis
of
the
outfits
that
they
wear,
I
will
explore
pink
as
a
political
symbol
of
queer
self
love,
sapphic
love,
and
a
distinct
removal
from
the
oppressive
forces
of
masculinity.
This
argument
is
developed
by
engagement
with
theoretical
works;
Luce
Irigaray’s
concept
of
mimicry
explains
how
visible
tools
of
oppression
can
be
re-‐appropriated
as
a
subversive
act,
while
an
application
of
the
Foucauldian
analysis
of
“reverse
discourse,”
enables
a
new
understanding
of
how
wearing
pink
can
help
re-‐write
the
social
narrative
of
lesbian
dress
and
identity.
This
is
a
topic
which
affects
anyone
who
has
been
shaped,
shunned,
or
silenced
by
stereotypical
images
of
heterosexual
femininity.
Institution/Affiliation:
full
Dance
Professor
at
CEFET/RJ
(Brazil)
and
Ph.D.
Candidate
in
Communication
and
Culture
at
Federal
University
of
Rio
de
Janeiro
(Brazil
Abstract:
This
paper
examines
the
brief
but
remarkable
presence
of
leftist
politician
Marielle
Franco,
executed
in
2018,
in
Brazilian
politics.
During
the
2017
municipal
elections,
her
candidacy
was
not
qualified
as
lesbian,
but
as
a
black
woman
favelada
(poor
from
the
shanty
towns).
During
her
term
–
brutally
interrupted
after
one
year
by
her
execution
in
circumstances
that
still
have
no
solution
–
she
could
foster
to
put
the
“Lesbian
Visibility
Day”
for
the
municipal
vote.
Her
proposal
was
defeated
in
the
municipality
and
this
day,
August
29th,
was
chosen
to
celebrate
the
1st.
National
Seminar
of
Lesbian
(SENALE),
in
1996.
Monica
Benício,
Franco’s
widow,
became
known
broadly
in
mass
media
journals.
Since
then,
Benício
has
spoken
publicly
in
order
to
pressure
governmental
institutions
and
she
is
now
a
strong
figure
to
support
leftist
political
struggles
in
Brazil
against
the
Conservative
turn.
My
aim
is
to
examine
Franco’s
intersectional
agendas
of
class,
race,
gender,
and
sexuality
through
her
institutionalized
political
struggles
during
her
term
as
a
minority
force
in
the
parliament.
With
the
theoretical
support
of
Franco’s
intellectual
work
and
that
of
Angela
Davis,
Audre
Lorde
and
Brazilian
black
lesbian
thinkers,
such
as
Fátima
Lima
and
Edmeire
Exaltação,
I
try
to
address
Marielle’s
intersectional
agendas
with
her
life
as
a
politician
in
Rio
de
Janeiro.
It
is
worth
to
mention
that
Lima
and
Exaltação’s
work
is
both
theoretical
and
practical
and
that
hey
organize
a
house
called
Casa
das
Pretas
–
the
very
last
public
meeting
of
Franco.
Yet
standing
for
black
poor
women’s
very
overtly,
her
lesbian
aspect
only
became
public
after
her
election.
Even
so,
she
was
able
to
gather
a
23
strong
lesbian
movement
that
almost
won
the
Lesbian
Visibility
Day
in
the
municipality.
This
context
shows
how
ambiguous
(in)visibility
can
be,
especially
in
the
intersection
of
class,
race
and
gender
discussions.
Institution/Affiliation:
Third
Year
undergraduate
student
in
English
Language
and
Literature
University
of
Oxford
Title:
‘...that
eventually
became
queer’:
queer
women’s
becomings-‐with
queer
men
in
the
context
of
HIV/AIDS
Abstract:
Queer
women’s
identity
formation
does
not
occur
in
a
vacuum.
This
paper
contends
that
queer
women’s
identity
formation
has
been
vitally
informed
by
their
affiliations
with
queer
men.
These
‘becomings-‐with’
(in
Donna
Haraway’s
terms)
and
‘against’
shape
how
queer
communities
interact.
By
using
literary
and
archival
texts
alongside
my
own
experience
as
a
lesbian
trans
woman,
I
propose
to
approach
identity
formation
in
a
way
which
prioritises
relationships
across
queer
identities.
Drawing
upon
Donna
Haraway,
Eve
Kosofsky
Sedgwick,
and
Felix
Guattari
and
Gilles
Deleuze’s
theories
of
identification,
I
locate
my
analysis
of
lesbian
identity
formation
within
the
HIV/AIDS
Crisis
in
America.
This
period
saw
extraordinary
cooperation
between
queer
men
and
women,
and
created
a
set
of
social
spaces,
such
as
those
within
ACT
UP
New
York,
in
which
queer
becomings-‐with
thrived.
In
order
to
discuss
the
specific
processes
of
queer
identity
formation
in
the
period,
I
examine
literary
works
(including
Sarah
Schulman’s
Rat
Bohemia
and
Rebecca
Brown’s
The
Gifts
of
the
Body)
alongside
archival
material
from
the
ACT
UP
Oral
History
Project.
In
doing
so,
I
contend
that
the
specific
contexts
of
queer
activism
and
of
caring
for
dying
loved
ones
created
spaces
for
becomings-‐with
between
queer
men
and
women
in
this
period.
Complementing
these
readings
will
be
an
autotheoretical
discussion
of
my
life
as
a
lesbian
trans
woman
who
was
previously
in
a
homosexual
relationship
with
a
man.
My
process
of
becoming-‐
with/against
my
former
self
will
be
used
to
inform
my
theoretical
approach
and
suggest
a
new
model
of
queer
and
lesbian
identity
formation.
Although
the
AIDS
crisis
has
been
articulated
as
a
site
of
gentrification
and
the
destruction
of
cross-‐LGBTQ
spaces
and
relationships,
the
parallel
reading
of
my
own
identity
alongside
texts
from
this
period
points
towards
an
alternative
future
of
queer
cooperation.'
Institution/Affiliation:
Senior
Lecturer,
Qualitative
Research
in
Health,
The
University
of
Sydney,
Sydney
Health
Ethics,
Faculty
of
Medicine
and
Health,
University
of
Sydney
Title:
Why
mass
media
anti-‐smoking
campaigns
fail
to
engage
lesbian,
bisexual
and
queer
(LBQ)
women
in
Australia
Abstract:
There
is
robust
international
data
showing
lesbian,
bisexual
and
queer
(LBQ)
women
smoke
at
higher
rates
than
their
heterosexual
peers.
As
part
of
a
program
of
work
funded
by
Cancer
Institute
NSW
24
and
in
collaboration
with
a
community
health
promotion
organisation
(ACON
Health),
our
study
sought
to
understand
the
significance
of
smoking
for
LBQ
women.
We
conducted
6
focus
groups
with
28
LBQ
women
smokers
and
ex-‐smokers
in
urban
and
regional
settings
in
Australia.
We
report
here
on
perceptions
of
mass-‐media
anti-‐smoking
campaigns.
Mainstream
messaging
failed
to
connect
with
participants
for
three
reasons.
First,
messaging
and
imagery
were
simply
un-‐relatable;
not
as
expected
because
LBQ
women
were
invisible
but
because
participants
saw
old
men,
unhealthy
people,
no
one
‘like
them’.
Women,
when
featured,
quit
smoking
to
fulfil
family
responsibilities.
Second,
LBQ
women
talked
about
resisting
what
they
saw
as
an
attempt
to
control
them
(often
through
scare
tactics;
they
didn’t
believe
government
messaging
reflected
a
genuine
care
for
them
as
LBQ
women.
Finally,
women
reacted
negatively
to
the
shame,
guilt
and
stigma
implicit
in
the
campaigns
they
could
recall.
We’ll
look
briefly
at
what
participants
thought
would
resonate
for
women
like
them,
and
then
demonstrate
how
this
was
articulated
by
the
Smoke
Free
Still
Fierce
smoking
cessation
community
campaign
developed
by
ACON
Health.
Title:
The
SWASH
survey
of
lesbian,
bisexual
and
queer
women’s
health:
How
community
shaped
and
sustained
a
22
year
collaboration
in
Sydney,
Australia.
Abstract:
In
1996,
health
workers
at
the
AIDS
Council
of
New
South
Wales
(Australia),
concerned
about
a
lack
of
evidence
about
HIV
risk
for
women
partners
of
gay
and
bisexual
men,
worked
with
researchers
to
run
the
first
Sydney
Women
and
Sexual
Health
Survey
(SWASH).
SWASH
quickly
became
a
means
to
capture
and
track
critical
health
indicators
(beyond
sexual
health)
of
community-‐engaged
lesbian,
bisexual,
queer
(LBQ)
and
other
non-‐heterosexual
identifying
women
who
engage
with
LGBTQ
communities
in
Sydney.
It
has
been
conducted
every
two
years
since
1996,
making
it
the
longest
running
(perhaps
only)
periodic
survey
of
LBQ
women's
health
in
the
world.
In
the
absence
of
a
‘mainstream’
evidence
base,
SWASH
has
driven
and
informed
action.
SWASH
is
run
by
researchers
in
collaboration
with
a
community
health
promotion
organisation,
where
members
of
LGBTQ
communities
work
in
and
for
LGBTQ
communities.
In
this
presentation
we
will
tell
the
SWASH
story
from
our
perspective
as
researchers.
We
will
reflect
on
how
the
lived
experience
of
LBQ
women
(and
more
recently
non-‐binary
people)
in
the
community
has
shaped
and
sustained
the
collaboration
and
profoundly
influenced
the
way
we
research.
The
community
has
a
strong
sense
of
ownership
over
the
project;
we
will
talk
about
the
accountabilities
and
challenges
this
produces
for
the
researchers
and
for
our
community
partner.
In
producing
scientific
evidence,
SWASH
makes
LBQ
women
and
their
health
needs
visible
to
the
mainstream
(and
by
extension,
our
findings
become
a
demand
for
action).
But
it
also
acts
to
tell
LBQ
women
about
their
health,
and
construct
the
very
notion
of
common
health
interests.
25
Abstract:
‘Reel
Life
Data’
was
a
competition
that
sought
to
bring
to
life,
through
film,
data
from
a
LGBTQ
attitudinal
dataset.
The
aim
was
that
this
would
increase
data
accessibility
but
also
widen
its
reach
beyond
academic
audiences.
This
paper
explores
how
one
group
of
LGBTQ
young
women
with
learning
disabilities
engaged
with
this
project
and
the
impact
of
their
involvement.
The
paper
highlights
the
topics
they
raised
(community,
education,
politics
and
future
aspirations)
but
also
considers
the
use
of
film
production,
by
non-‐filmmakers,
as
a
means
of
making
visible
their
experiences.
It
considers
how
the
anonymity
of
being
behind
a
camera
enabled
these
young
women,
who
previously
had
not
spoken
out
on
such
matters,
the
confidence
to
do
so.
The
paper
concludes
by
screening
their
3-‐minute
film
‘Growing
up
gay
in
Northern
Ireland’.
Title:
“Thigh
gaps
are
a
currency
where
I
come
from”:
Willam
Belli,
Commodification,
and
Queer
Femininities
Abstract:
This
paper
considers
how
performance,
specifically
drag
performance,
represents
the
complexities
of
the
embodied
self.
Returning
to
Judith
Butler’s
canonical
argument
that
drag
reveals
the
performative
nature
of
gender,
this
paper
explores
the
output
of
the
controversial
YouTube
performer
and
RuPaul’s
Drag
Race
alumnus,
Willam
Belli.
I
argue
that
Willam’s
work
constitutes
an
embedded,
enmeshed,
and
complicit
commentary
on
the
commodification
of
femininity
and
the
hypersexualisation
of
the
female
body
in
the
contemporary
“attention
economy”
of
social
media
and
digital
self-‐entrepreneurship.
The
title
quote
of
this
paper
is
Willam’s
tongue-‐in-‐cheek
protest
against
the
body-‐positivity
mantra
that
women
don’t
need
to
have
thigh
gaps.
Declaring
this
“hate
speech,”
Willam
displays
his
allegiance
to
thigh-‐gap
ideals
of
femininity
and
thus
to
celebrified
body
culture
in
LA
(his
hometown)
and
online,
and
the
idea
of
the
“hot”
body
as
currency.
The
winner
of
Drag
Race’s
wet
t-‐shirt
competition
during
his
tenure
on
the
show,
Willam’s
performance
consistently
focuses
on
“hotness,”
the
kind
of
“sex-‐tape
femininity”
that,
commentators
have
noted,
emerges
at
the
nexus
of
postfeminism,
entrepreneurial
neoliberalism,
and
digital
and
social
media.
Consistently
posing
himself
as
“slut”
and
“whore,”
through
his
exaggerated,
dragged-‐out
version
of
this
form
of
femininity,
Willam
seems
to
reveal
how
digital
media’s
attention
economies
are
currently
constructing
femininity,
and
in
particular,
constructing
femininity
as
commodity.
In
Willam’s
work
this
lurid
nihilism
of
the
feminine
feeds
into
an
overall
aesthetic
of
humour
that
is
racist,
transphobic,
ableist,
and
misogynistic,
such
that
we
certainly
cannot
read
Willam
as
a
queer
theorist
or
political
heroine
of
drag.
And
yet
he
is
of
interest
as
an
ambivalently
located
cultural
performer,
both
critical
and
compelled,
both
detached
and
embedded;
even
while
he
performs
a
post-‐mortem
on
the
postfeminist
body,
he
chooses
to
perform
and
embody
that
body
and
self-‐
declaredly
identifies
with
it.
Displaying
an
abrasive
and
abject
body-‐non-‐specific
feminine
performativity,
Wilam
seems
to
show
us
something
about
femme
subjectivities
beyond
the
cis-‐
female
but
simultaneously
outside
of
the
transfeminine;
a
kind
of
self-‐annihilating
femme
negativity
that
reveals
a
new
side
of
queer
femininities.
26
Author’s
Name(s):
Kate
O’Riordan
&
Sharon
Webb
Institution/Affiliation:
Head
of
School,
Media
Film
and
Music,
University
of
Sussex
Title:
What’s
in
a
name:
queer
politics
on
campus
Abstract:
This
paper
draws
on
interviews
and
archival
work
examining
the
history
of
LGBTQ+
student
society
at
the
University
of
Sussex.
It
reflects
upon
the
significance
of
the
name
changes
of
the
societies
on
campus
over
time
and
considers
their
role
in
concerns
and
political
movements
in
wider
society.
It
explores
the
experience
of
student
societies
in
relation
to
individual
and
group
identity.
It
looks
also
at
how
the
Sussex
groups
were
positioned
as
political
through
activism,
and
beyond
LGBTQ+
issues
and
the
university.
It
also
considers
the
relationship
between
life
on
campus
and
other
spaces
in
Brighton
and
Hove
and
explores
how
town
and
gown
are
interwoven
in
the
political,
social
and
cultural
experiences
of
queer
community
in
Brighton
and
Hove.
The
project
assembled
material
over
a
timeline
from
1970
to
2017;
from
Gay.soc
to
the
LGBTQ+
society.
Three
key
themes
are
developed
from
the
primary
materials:
This
research
is
based
on
material
gathered
by
two
student
researchers
who
worked
with
the
University
of
Sussex
Student
Union.
They
identified
previous
society
members,
a
timeline
and
media
coverage
of
the
Society.
They
carried
out
interviews
with
members,
past
and
present,
and
identified
media
materials,
including
a
combination
of
materials
from
participants
and
broader
media
coverage
in
local
and
national
media.
They
identified
a
number
of
key
events,
demonstrations,
issues,
exhibitions
and
controversies
including:
actions
against
British
Home
Stores
(1976);
the
Campaign
for
Homosexual
Equality
(1979);
protests
against
Section
28
(1988);
engagements
with
Pride;
alliances
and
antagonisms
around
the
inclusion
of
L,
B,
T,
Q
and
+;
and
controversies
over
the
words
dyke
and
faggot.
Abstract:
This
paper
will
give
an
overview
on
the
difficulties
encountered
to
collect
and
to
write
lesbian
history
in
Luxembourg.
Starting
point
is
the
publication
of
a
book
on
“Women
and
Gender”
which
led
to
the
observation
that
there
is
almost
“zero”
material
on
lesbian
lives,
voices
and
bodies.
The
questions
that
arose
were:
how
can
public
policies
integrate
lesbian
perspectives
if
lesbians
don’t’
exist
in
the
Luxembourgish
social,
cultural
and
political
space?
How
can
lesbians
be
visible
(and
stand
for
their
rights)
if
they
don’t
have
a
trace
of
their
past?
How
can
we
use
the
existent
to
create
a
lesbian
genealogy?
In
order
to
find
answers
to
those
questions,
this
presentation
would
like
to
open
a
discussion
and
enable
participants
to
share
similar
experiences
from
other
countries
or
cities.
27
Author’s
Name(s):
Erin
J.
Rand
Title: “Ravishing Resistance: The Radical Aesthetics of Queer Feminine Fashion”
Abstract:
Masculine
of
center
fashion
has
received
unprecedented
publicity
in
the
last
decade,
with
new
fashion
bloggers
and
brands
featuring
menswear
styled
for
butch
women,
trans
men,
and
gender
non-‐conforming
folks.
The
allure
and
transgression
of
these
looks
are
undeniable,
but
when
that
transgression
is
assumed
to
occur
through
cross-‐gender
stylization—female-‐assigned
bodies
donning
masculine-‐coded
clothing—the
potential
political
and
aesthetic
resistance
of
queer
feminine
fashion
is
obscured.
This
paper
thus
engages
with
a
variety
of
feminine-‐leaning
queer
styles,
described
and
embodied
in
fashion
blogs
and
independent
brands,
in
order
to
investigate
the
way
they
navigate,
on
one
hand,
the
hypervisibility
and
display
demanded
by
femininity
and,
on
the
other
hand,
the
invisibility
and
disregard
that
often
characterizes
feminine
style
in
queer
communities.
Specifically,
I
consider
three
queer
feminine
fashion
blogs
(Defiant
Femme,
Fit
for
a
Femme
and
DapperQ’s
“sibling
project,”
“Hi
Femme!”),
as
well
as
two
brands
that
cater
to
queer
feminine
people
of
all
genders,
races,
dis/abilities,
and
body
types
(Cilium
and
Rebirth
Garments).
In
order
to
understand
how
these
blogs
and
brands
embrace,
reinterpret,
and
refuse
patriarchal
and
heteronormative
cultural
norms
of
appearance
and
style,
I
bring
together
scholarship
in
fashion
studies,
queer
studies,
and
rhetorical
studies,
as
well
as
histories
of
clothing
as
a
means
of
expression
and
resistance.
Ultimately,
I
suggest
that
queer
feminine
aesthetics,
working
in
the
interstices
of
hypervisibility
and
invisibility,
engage
with,
rewrite,
and
sometimes
subvert
the
rules
of
fashion,
the
expectations
of
gendered
and
sexual
categories,
the
meanings
associated
with
particular
sartorial
signifiers,
and
the
value
accorded
to
particular
bodily
configurations.
Author’s Name(s): Dr Fiona Rooney, Tom Vlietstra & Yalda Tomlinson
Title: (in)visible sex: LGBTQI Identity, meaningful sex and Intellectual Disability.
Abstract:
Inclusivity
movements
have
focused
on
improving
the
sex
lives
of
those
with
physical
disabilities.
This
taboo
has
also
been
challenged
in
intellectual
disability
services
since
the
1980s,
however
the
focus
of
this
is
often
in
the
areas
of
‘safe
sex’,
‘mental
capacity’
or
reducing
‘challenging
sexual
behaviour.’
People
with
intellectual
disabilities
who
are
members
of
the
LGBTQI
community
have
been
largely
neglected
from
research
and
remain
a
hidden
and
marginalised
group
in
society.
There
is
a
sad
history
of
the
discussion
of
sexuality
and
gender
identity
being
constructed
as
‘perversion’
or
ignored
within
the
field
of
intellectual
disability.
Positive
changes
are
taking
place,
however
more
can
be
done
to
increase
service’s
confidence
in
providing
support.
This
talk
aims
to
explain
what
an
intellectual
disability
is,
discuss
the
importance
of
discussing
‘meaningful’
and
‘pleasurable’
sex,
and
explore
the
barriers
such
individuals
face
in
terms
of
expressing
their
identity,
accessing
appropriate
28
services
and
negotiating
this
within
their
lives.
Particular
focus
will
be
given
to
sharing
to
results
of
research
based
on
interviews,
focusing
on
how
cis-‐women
with
intellectual
disabilities
describe
and
understand
their
LGB
identity,
where
they
felt
included
and
excluded
in
their
day-‐to-‐day
lives
and
if
they
felt
supported
in
their
expression
of
same-‐sex
attraction;
three
main
themes
were
identified:
‘non-‐heterosexual
identity
as
difficult’,
‘the
impact
of
invisibility
and
difference’
and
‘visibility
and
a
positive
sense
of
self’.
Institution/Affiliation:
Senior
Lecturer,
Director,
Centre
for
Intimate
and
Sexual
Citizenship
(CISC)
Department
of
Sociology,
University
of
Essex
Title:
‘Haven’t
you
literally
been
on
a
date
with
every
single
woman
in
London
yet?!’:
Lesbian
Online
Dating
Abstract:
This
paper
will
explore
how
the
digital
realm
impacts
on
lesbian
personal
relationships
via
the
experience
of
online
dating.
The
growing
popularity
of
online
dating
websites
and
apps
demonstrates
that
this
is
an
increasingly
commonplace
activity
for
people
seeking
a
partner.
Yet
little
is
known
about
how
online
dating
is
potentially
transforming
intimate
relationships.
In
particular,
the
experiences
of
lesbian,
bisexual
and
queer
women
have
been
almost
completely
unexplored.
This
study
provides
new
insights
into
technology,
gender
and
intimacy
through
in-‐depth
interviews
with
15
women
who
live
in
London
and
have
experience
of
online
dating.
It
is
argued
that
online
dating
both
reinscribes
and
subverts
prevailing
gender
norms.
Topics
explored
include
gender
and
ageing,
harassment
and
new
normativities
in
the
digital
era.
The
paper
explores
new
understandings
of
the
role
of
digital
intimacies
in
contemporary
life,
as
well
as
the
changing
context
for
gender
relations
and
sexual
citizenship.
Institution/Affiliation: activist
Title: Let's celebrate the riotts of Stonewall by documenting the history of our (lesbian) bars
Abstract:
We
archive
the
history
of
Geneva's
festive
and
militant
places
frequented
by
lesbians,
bies,
heterosexual,
cis
and
trans
friends,
non-‐binary
people
from
the
70s
to
the
present
day.
We
work
in
a
collaborative
and
DIY
approach.
We
are
presenting
these
archives
now,
in
anticipation
of
Stonewall's
50th
anniversary
commemorations,
which
will,
unfortunately,
continue
to
make
the
history
of
LBTs
and
LBT
racialized
people
invisible.
We
organize
an
intergenerational
mobilization
of
lesbian
and
bisexual,
cis
and
trans
people.
We
want
them
to
realize
that
they
are
actresses
of
this
story.
It
is
crucial
that
they
could
appropriate
these
stories
and
become
producers
of
knowledge
and
archives.
29
We
will
present
the
playful
participative
devices
set
up
to
learn
how
to
document
our
individual
and
collective
histories
ourselves.
We
will
share
tested
strategies
to
encourage
a
collective
involvement
of
everyone,
especially
for
the
less
aware
of
these
issues
and
the
most
vulnerable.
We
are
in
the
process
of
enriching
and
strengthening
the
already
existing
archives,
such
as
those
of
the
lesbian
association
Lestime
or
those
of
the
city,
thanks
to
the
collections
carried
out
within
the
framework
of
the
project.
We
chose
to
create
a
digital
cartography
to
mediate
these
archives
collected,
archives
created
and
digitized
by
the
city,
television
and
other
institutional
archives,
or
archives
that
we
have
helped
to
create.
We
will
share
our
questions
about
other
mediations
to
put
in
place
to
make
this
story
and
these
archives
visible.
Institution/Affiliation:
Abstract:
The
workshop
will
be
an
opportunity
to
allow
participants
to
meet
by
discovering
together
archives
brought
by
participants,
lecturers,
members
of
the
University
...
The
workshop
will
also
help
to
question
the
archives
that
we
miss,
those
that
have
been
destroyed
or
that
are
not
communicated
to
us.
The
idea
is
to
create
a
playful
and
convivial
framework
of
shared
discovery
of
archives
in
the
form
of
a
speed
dating:
we
use
the
codes
of
speed
dating,
a
timed
time,
a
protocol
of
questions
...
After
showing
up,
the
participants
will
discover
an
archive
hidden
in
an
envelope
and
an
envelope
with
a
representation
of
the
mechanisms
of
invisibilisation
of
the
history
of
lesbians.
They
will
be
invited
to
exchange
and
draw
comic
bubbles
and
to
write
inside
what
this
archive
evokes
to
them
in
relation
to
their
personal
history
and
then
in
relation
to
the
history
of
our
community.
Then
they
will
annotate
together
the
rubrics
of
an
archival
presentation.
Once,
the
time
dedicated
to
the
speed
dating
elapsed,
the
participants
are
invited
to
gather
the
archives
and
notes
and
to
discover
what
the
other
pairs
or
trinomials
have
discovered
and
expressed.
Thus
a
collection
of
archives
will
be
collectively
constituted
ephemeral
in
connection
with
the
colloquium
and
a
digital
trace
will
be
carried
out
later
(see
the
example
*
of
digital
trace
of
a
workshop
that
we
animated
in
a
Marseille
Museum
MUCEM).
We
want
to
allow
participants
to
become
aware
of
their
legitimacy
to
discover
archives,
to
constitute
and
contribute
with
their
/
our
vocabularies.
We
want
to
share
a
sorority
moment.
30
Author’s
Name(s):
Elisabeth
T.
Sandler
Abstract:
This
paper
discusses
findings
from
my
MPhil
research
(University
of
Cambridge,
2017/18)
which
explored
how
leave
affected
ten
female
same-‐sex
parents’
experience
of
their
parental
identity.
Semi-‐structured
interviews
and
two-‐week
diaries
(diary-‐interview
method)
shed
light
on
parental
identity
experiences
within
the
settings
of
shared
parental,
maternity,
and
adoption
leave,
as
well
as
ineligibility
for
leave
in
the
UK.
Participants
identified
as
‘female’,
‘mothers’,
and
‘same-‐sex’
which
includes
sexual
orientations
such
as
‘lesbian’,
‘gay
woman’,
‘bisexual’,
and
‘pansexual’.
Findings
suggest
that
being
on
leave
increased
participants’
visibility
as
parents,
but
not
necessarily
as
same-‐
sex
parents.
This
parental
(in)visibility
is
two-‐layered:
(1)
to
oneself
and
(2)
to
others
such
as
their
partner,
child,
health
practitioners,
or
strangers.
First,
in
providing
focus,
presence,
and
time,
leave
allowed
participants
to
live
up
to
their
parental
identity
definition
through
engaging
in
tasks
they
imagined
a
parent
to
do.
In
engaging
in
parental
tasks,
participants
became
visible
to
themselves
as
parents.
Second,
being
on
leave
increased
participants’
interactions
with
others
in
their
parental
role.
These
interactions
facilitated
parental
visibility
to
others
and,
in
being
viewed
and
treated
as
parents
by
others,
increased
parental
visibility
to
themselves.
Interestingly,
this
visibility
layer
is
not
dependent
on
confirmed
knowledge.
Parental
identities
were
often
assumed
by
strangers,
based
on
the
assumption
that
a
female
with
a
child
is
this
child’s
mother.
This
assumption,
however,
is
heteronormative
in
expecting
only
one
mother:
When
in
public
as
a
family,
in
contrast
to
being
out
with
their
child(ren)
alone,
strangers
often
did
not
recognise
both
participants
as
the
child’s
parent/mother.
The
act
of
outing
their
partner
and
family
constellation
was
then
necessary
in
order
to
be
both
visible
within
their
parental
roles.
Due
to
heteronormativity,
being
on
leave
together
can
then
lessen
parental
visibility.
Affiliation/ institution: IHS -‐ Institut für Höhere Studien -‐ Institute for Advanced Studies
Abstract:
The
first
part
of
this
paper
discusses
the
invisibility
of
lesbian
identities
in
economic
theory.
Starting
from
the
inaugural
moment
when
Hobbes
and
Locke
legitimize
private
property
in
their
contract
theories,
personal
identity
was
created
in
a
patriarchic,
(heteronormative),
colonial
and
capitalist
process
that
needs
a
hierarchic
interaction
between
sexes,
races
and
classes.
Lesbian
existence
is
not
an
issue
in
economic
theory
and
sexual
“deviance”
is
ruled
out
from
neoliberal
models
of
family
economics.
The
second
part
of
this
paper
is
specifically
concerned
with
processes
of
lesbian
identity
formation
against
the
backdrop
of
an
economic
system
and
culture
that
has
rendered
lesbians
invisible
for
centuries,
but
now
offers
a
place
for
all
that
are
economically
and
personally
successful:
Neoliberalism
demands
self-‐optimizing
of
minds
and
bodies
in
private
and
public
spheres
as
well
as
in
activist
settings:
In
a
dynamic
market
place
a
plethora
of
identities
are
available
and
ready
for
personal
integration.
In
the
1980s
the
default
lines
between
the
“good”
and
the
“bad”
lesbians
were
31
sexual
activities,
in
the
2010s
lesbian
identities
are
played
against
each
other
and
the
competition
is
once
again
fierce!
Title:
(In)
Visibility
in
language
attributed
to
representations
of
female
masculinity
as
exemplified
by
Soviet
history.
Abstract:
From
monarchs
to
arts
and
culture,
Russia
has
had
strong
links
with
Europe,
but
the
Revolution
of
1917
followed
by
the
creation
of
the
USSR
changed
the
dynamics
by
closing
the
iron
curtain
between
the
two
worlds.
Censorship
and
isolation
from
the
West
have
created
a
culture
that
is
not
exposed
to
ideas
of
sexual
and
gender
diversities
but
how
different
are
the
histories
of
lesbian
lives
in
Russia
and
the
UK
during
the
past
century?
For
example,
decriminalisation
of
homosexuality
after
perestroika
in
1993
,
federal
law
introduced
in
2013
criminalising
the
distribution
of
materials
in
support
of
LGBT
community
amongst
minors
is
reminiscent
to
Section
28
from
the
past
that
prevented
“homosexual
propaganda”
in
the
UK.
The
proposed
visual
presentation
concentrates
on
images
of
female
masculinity
throughout
Soviet
history
and
aims
to
avoid
misinterpretations
of
the
identities
behind
these
images.
The
problematics
of
identity
labels
are
subject
to
a
current
debate
in
the
UK.
This
can
be
seen
on
fliers
and
badges
distributed
by
Brighton
and
Hove
city
council
(Fig.
5)
on
the
use
of
pronouns.
This
flux
state
of
language
in
relation
to
gender
is
also
exemplified
by
the
rainbow
plaque
dedicated
to
Anne
Lister
(1791-‐1840)
referred
at
first
to
Lister
as
“Gender-‐nonconforming
entrepreneur”
(Fig.
6).
Controversy
surrounds
the
terminology
used
on
the
plaque
creates
a
space
for
the
critique
of
contemporary
terminology
in
defining
historic
figures.
In
presentation
the
correct
terminology
in
relation
to
representations
of
female
masculinity
in
Soviet
history
from
1917
through
Soviet
era
to
Perestroika
is
established
and
follows
the
tendencies
of
the
language
in
representing
female
masculinity.
While
approaching
representations
of
female
masculinity
in
a
format
of
an
archive
creates
a
form
of
visual
affirmation
of
the
diversity
in
gender
representations
in
history,
what
is
the
role
of
the
language
attached
to
them
and
what
form
of
(In)Visibility
it
has
a
potential
to
create?
Institution/Affiliation:
DPhil
Candidate
in
Philosophy,
Uehiro
Centre
for
Practical
Ethics,
University
of
Oxford
Title:
“Love
Drugs”
and
Queer
Visibility
Abstract:
A
growing
philosophical
literature
is
exploring
the
ethics
of
“love
drugs”
–
biotechnology
that
might,
in
the
future,
influence
who
we
are
romantically
attracted
to.
In
a
recent
paper,
Earp,
Sandberg,
&
Savulescu
(2014)
consider
whether
it
would
be
morally
permissible
for
a
gay
person
to
take
drugs
that
would
make
them
straight
(were
such
drugs
developed
in
the
future),
in
order
to
escape
severe
32
discrimination.
In
this
paper,
I
ask
the
opposite
question:
would
it
be
morally
permissible
for
a
straight
person
to
take
drugs
that
would
make
them
gay,
or
pan?
There
seems
to
be
something
morally
troubling
about
unnaturally
changing
one’s
sexual
orientation,
in
cases
where
one
would
go
from
a
privileged
orientation
to
a
marginalized
one.
I
explore
both
consequentialist
and
non-‐consequentialist
versions
of
this
worry.
The
consequentialist
version
of
the
objection
would
contend
that
changing
one’s
orientation
to
queer
could
result
in
harm
to
the
queer
community.
The
non-‐consequentialist
version
of
the
objection
contends
that
changing
one’s
orientation
from
straight
to
queer
is
morally
wrong,
apart
from
any
negative
consequences
it
might
have
for
queer
folks.
After
considering
the
objections
to
straight-‐to-‐queer
love
drugs,
I
consider
whether
a
positive
case
could
be
made
in
favour
of
their
use.
In
particular,
I
explore
how
the
use
of
such
drugs
would
introduce
a
novel
kind
of
“queer
visibility”
–
one
that
would
enable
previously
straight
people
to
see
what
it
is
like
to
be
queer
through
their
own
eyes.
Author’s Name(s): Jane Traies, Pip Scott, Marguerite Saffery, Barbara Young
Title: ‘How many old lesbians does it take to write a history book?’
Abstract:
This
collaborative
panel
presentation
addresses
the
politics
of
(in)visibility
as
it
applies
to
older
lesbians,
by
putting
four
women
in
their
seventies
and
eighties
centre
stage.
The
panellists
are
all
contributors
to
Now
You
See
Me
(ed.
Jane
Traies,
2018),
a
collection
of
life
stories
told
by
lesbians
born
before
1950.
Rather
than
three
discrete
academic
papers,
it
features
readings,
personal
reflections
and
discussion.
The
participants
will
read
from
their
own
stories,
as
well
as
describing
the
process
of
co-‐producing
the
book
and
reflecting
on
what
this
experience
of
‘becoming
visible’
has
been
like
for
them.
Speaker biographies:
Marguerite
Saffery:
Born
in
1946,
during
a
heatwave
followed
by
one
of
the
worst
winters
on
record,
a
life
from
the
start
full
of
juxtapositions.
Educated
by
Anglican
nuns,
expelled
twice,
hung
on
until
I
was
18.
Studied
theology.
Wanted
to
be
a
priest:
no
chance.
Spent
37
years
teaching
English,
opening
a
world
for
people
to
be
the
best
they
could
be
in
a
universe
of
glittering
choices.
Married,
because
you
do;
two
girls;
divorced.
Joined
a
consciousness
raising
group,
and
my
life
became
even
more
complicated;
born
again.
Had
first
relationship
with
a
woman,
met
my
now
wife,
a
home
for
ever.
Retired,
able
to
take
part
in
social
action,
helped
to
start
and
run
a
foodbank.
Became
a
grandmother.
Always
aimed
to
change
the
world
–
failed
in
the
big
attempt,
maybe
some
success
in
the
smaller
efforts.
Barbara
Young:
I
am
70
years
old.
I
totally
changed
my
life
at
the
age
of
40,
when
I
realised
that
I
had
to
look
at
who
I
am
before
it
was
too
late.
I
now
view
myself
as
lesbian.
I
have
two
adult
33
children
who
are
very
open
about
my
identity,
and
my
ex-‐husband
of
25
years
gave
permission
for
his
photo
to
appear
in
this
book.
I
am
in
a
civil
partnership
and
will
this
year
celebrate
this
relationship’s
25
years.
I
retired
8
years
ago
from
a
career
in
social
work.
I
now
enjoy
being
creative
with
wood.
Kate
Foley:
My
working
life
ranged
from
delivering
babies
to
conserving
delicate
archaeological
material.
My
last
job
was
as
Head
of
English
Heritage’s
scientific
and
technical
research
laboratories.
Although I have always written poetry, it wasn’t until I gave up the day job that I began to publish.
I
now
live,
with
my
Dutch
wife,
between
Amsterdam
and
Suffolk,
where
I
perform,
write,
edit,
lead
workshops
and
work
with
artists
in
other
disciplines.
Electric
Psalms:
New
and
Selected
Poems
was
published
by
Shoestring
Press
in
2016
and
A
Gift
of
Rivers,
my
10th
collection,
by
Arachne
Press
in
2018.
Jane
Traies:
I
am
an
independent
scholar,
writer
and
researcher
loosely
attached
to
Sussex
University.
I
have
been
recording
the
experiences
of
the
oldest
generations
of
lesbians
in
the
UK
for
about
ten
years.
Some
of
these
stories
featured
in
my
first
book,
The
Lives
of
Older
Lesbians:
Sexuality,
Identity
and
the
Life
Course
(Palgrave
Macmillan,
2016).
I
continue
to
record
the
life-‐
narratives
of
women
born
before
1950
who
identify
as
lesbian
or
bisexual;
my
second
book,
Now
You
See
Me
(Tollington
Press,
2018),
is
a
collection
of
some
of
these
stories.
Title: The Visibility of Identity: Lesbian Encounters with ‘Compulsory Sexuality’
Abstract:
In
the
growing
field
of
asexuality
studies,
the
notion
of
‘compulsory
sexuality’
has
increasingly
been
called
forth
to
explain
the
apparent
invisibility
of
asexuality
in
contemporary
Western
society.
In
a
2015
conceptual
overview,
Kristina
Gupta
argues
that
the
“privileging
of
sexuality
and
the
marginalisation
of
nonsexuality”
(147)
makes
sexuality
–
analogous
to
but
independent
of
heterosexuality
–
a
system
of
compulsory
regulation.
Evidence
is
found
in
such
places
as
archaic
marriage
consummation
laws,
the
‘male
sexual
drive
discourse’,
and
sexualisation
as
“the
increasing
visibility
of
and
importance
afforded
to
sex
and
sexuality
in
the
public
and
private
spheres”
(139)
–
underpinned
by
the
“assumption
of
universal
sexual
interest”
(141).
As
such,
she
writes:
“Our
society’s
definition
of
the
human
and
the
normal
is
tied
to
the
sexual,
but
not
necessarily
any
longer
to
the
heterosexual.”
(142)
However,
I
argue
that
proponents
of
compulsory
sexuality
as
an
explanatory
concept
have
failed
to
critically
interrogate
the
‘visibility’
the
asexual
identity
category
as
an
emancipatory
goal,
nor
have
they
sufficiently
explored
dimensions
of
visibility
beyond
cultural
representation.
As
a
result,
this
work
simplifies
the
troubled
relationship
between
(a)sexuality,
agency,
and
gender
in
context
of
the
growing
commodification
of
the
erotic.
It
also
functions
to
invisibilise
the
subjective
articulation
of
qualitatively
different
asexualities
in
relation
to
the
continued
heteropatriarchal
structuration
of
sex.
My
paper
seeks
to
address
this
gap
by
paying
specific
attention
to
the
intersection
of
lesbian
and
asexual
experiences.
Building
on
three
in-‐depth
interviews
with
women
who
identify
with
both
34
‘queerness’
and
asexuality,
I
demonstrate
the
ways
in
which
dominant
narratives
of
asexuality
–
as
invisibilised
by
‘compulsory
sexuality’
–
mask
the
more
fraught
role
of
sexual
desire
in
lesbian
and
otherwise
‘queer’
womanhoods.
Accordingly,
I
argue
that
any
emancipatory
theory
of
asexuality
must
not
marginalise
the
analytic
framework
of
compulsory
heterosexuality.
Institution/Affiliation: PhD student of Social Psychology of the Autonomous University of Barcelona
Title:
The
constructed
and
legitimized
heteronormativity
in
academy:
“Invisibility”
of
the
female-‐
homosexual
population
&
“Invisibility”
of
the
heterosexual
population
in
the
Psychology
of
Spain,
Portugal,
Latin
America
and
China
Abstract:
Many
social
psychologists
we
affirm
that
we
investigate
male
homosexuality
and
lesbianism
fighting
for
social
equality.
But
in
fact,
precisely
our
investigations
are
constructing
and
legitimating
the
heteronormativity.
The
objective
of
the
present
work
is
to
identify
the
academic
construction
of
heteronormativity
of
the
Psychology
of
Spain,
Portugal,
Latin
America
and
China.1
Through
a
review
of
the
published
articles
of
the
Psychology
of
the
mentioned
countries
and
areas
on
male
homosexuality
and
lesbianism
during
2012-‐2016,
there’s
a
striking
difference
between
the
number
of
the
articles
about
general/male
homosexual
population
and
the
number
of
the
articles
about
the
female-‐homosexual
population.
In
the
80th
of
the
last
century,
Kitzinger
(1987)
has
indicated
the
invisibility
of
the
female-‐homosexual
population,
Stein
(2007)
also
states
that
until
now
researchers
still
only
occasionally
study
lesbians,
this
“invisibility”
still
reminds
us
that,
like
always,
the
academia
is
somehow
ignoring
the
female
non-‐heterosexual
population.
In
conditions
of
the
normative
heterosexuality,
occasionally
monitoring
gender
is
a
way
of
affirming
the
heterosexuality
(Butler
2007),
moreover,
scientific
discourses
legitimize
and/or
illegitimize
individuals’
behaviours
in
a
specific
society
(Jualiano,
2017),
then
the
simple
fact
that
researchers
study
male
homosexuality
and
lesbianism
without
questioning
heterosexuality
has
already
legitimized
and
naturalized
heterosexuality
as
the
normative
sexuality.
The
research
reveals
that
the
actual
Psychology
is
still
working
under
the
heterosexual
logic,
and
both
“invisibilities”
imply
that
the
academia
has
constructed
and
legitimized
the
heteronormativity
of
our
society
and
is
still
doing
it.
This
work
seeks
to
rethink
the
heterocentric
logic,
the
constitutive
power
of
scientific
discourses
and
the
ethical
and
political
effects
of
our
investigations.
Institution/Affiliation: Centre for Sexual Diversity, Studies at the University of Toronto.
Abstract:
On
November
20,
2018,
Glad
Day
Books
and
XTRA
Magazine
hosted
a
workshop
in
Toronto,
Canada,
focused
on
a
lack
of
space
for
queer
women
in
the
city.
Though
free,
the
event
required
reservations,
which
quickly
sold
out
online.
Queer,
lesbian,
bi,
and
trans
women
were
eager
to
be
35
part
of
an
intersectional
discussion
on
the
very
tangible
spatial
inequities
they
had
experienced
in
their
daily
lives.
While
the
event
provided
an
essential
space
for
discussion,
it
was
scheduled
on
the
same
day,
at
the
same
time
as
the
Trans
Day
of
Remembrance
Ceremony,
just
a
few
blocks
away.
When
confronted
about
this
scheduling
conflict
multiple
times
on
their
Facebook
page,
the
organizers
responded
to
every
critique
and
question
with
the
same
word-‐for-‐word
reply.
Ultimately,
they
did
not
change
the
date
or
time
of
the
event.
As
one
person
asserted
on
the
Facebook
page,
simply
acknowledging
the
error
and
continuing
with
the
event
is
insufficient:
“Queer
cis
women
(myself
included)
need
to
transparently
acknowledge
the
transphobic
history
of
many
lesbian/queer
spaces/institutions
in
Toronto
and
work
to
address
and
rectify
this
problem-‐-‐acknowledging
this
error
and
rescheduling
this
event–and
signal
boosting
the
519
event!–should
be
a
start.”
Though
adamant
about
their
inclusive
approach,
XTRA’s
refusal
to
shift
the
date
and
time
of
the
event
demonstrates
a
lack
of
care,
concern,
and
inclusion
for
those
who
are
most
marginalized
and
invisible
within
our
communities.
The
concurrent
events
are
an
indication
of
how
marginalized
groups
within
queer
communities
are
expected
to
thrive
with
not
only
less
space,
but
also
split
time.
Indeed,
XTRA
noted
in
their
posts
that
attendees
could
move
between
the
events,
slipping
in
and
out
of
the
spaces
as
they
see
fit.
The
assumption
that
marginalized
bodies
should
move
through
space
more
quickly
is
one
way
in
which
privilege
(and
oppression)
manifests.
Privileged
bodies
are
not
only
permitted
to
take
up
space,
but
to
take
it
up
for
longer
periods
of
time.
Thinking
through
the
spatial
and
temporal
dynamics
at
play
in
this
incident,
alongside
other
recent
acts
of
exclusion
in
queerwomen’s
spaces,
in
this
paper
I
consider
the
consequences
of
cis-‐centred
white
lesbian
activism
and
simplistic
empty
assertions
of
inclusivity.
Through
discussions
of
allyship
and
trans
invisibility,
ultimately,
this
paper
explores
how
the
expectations
of
space
and
time
use
impact
not
only
who
is
present
to
speak
in
the
room,
but
also
who
is
spoken
for
and
spoken
about.
36