Running head: HS 450 UNIT 7 ASSIGNMENT 1

HS 450 UNIT 7 ASSIGNMENT

Student’s Name

Institution of Affiliation
HS 450 UNIT 7 ASSIGNMENT 2

Part One

In a multi-campus hospital, project managers may face challenges due to a heavy

workforce, which can affect the institution's overall management. To progress the

administration's state, implementing effective instruments and strategies is fundamental. One

of the pivotal ways to attain this is often through healthcare direction compliance, which

alludes to following laws, rules, rules, and industry guidelines governing healthcare service

delivery. Compliance with healthcare directions is imperative for ensuring patient safety,

maintaining understanding rights, defending information privacy, and ensuring high-quality

care across healthcare organizations. Failure to comply with these controls can lead to legal

punishments, fines, reputational damage, and, most vitally, compromised patient care.

To continuously enhance the quality of care provided to patients, healthcare

organizations can receive quality management approaches. Quality management in healthcare

includes implementing forms, policies, and procedures to monitor, assess, and improve the

organization's healthcare services. The primary objectives of quality administration in

healthcare are to progress patient outcomes, boost patient satisfaction, decrease medical

errors, and optimize operational effectiveness. Implementing quality management

instruments, such as Control Charts, is a proficient way to ensure compliance with healthcare

industry measures.

Control Charts are vital in monitoring process varieties over time and identifying

deviations from built-up benchmarks. Hospitals can proactively distinguish and address

potential non-compliance issues by following key performance indicators (KPIs) related to

regulatory requirements (Litton et al., 2020). For example, a control chart may screen a

hospital's compliance with medication administration conventions or disease control

practices. If the data uncovers significant deviations from the required standards, remedial

actions can be swiftly taken to anticipate any regulatory violations. By integrating healthcare
HS 450 UNIT 7 ASSIGNMENT 3

regulation compliance and quality management practices, hospitals can meet industry

standards and strive for continuous improvement, ensuring the delivery of safe, high-quality

care to patients.

  Visual Example - Control Chart

Fishbone Diagrams, moreover known as Ishikawa or cause-and-effect diagrams, serve as

valuable devices for analyzing and analyzing the root causes of adverse events or medical

errors. These diagrams enable identifying and categorizing factors contributing to issues like

medical errors or persistent falls (Pletta et al., 2019). By understanding the basic reasons

behind security events through fishbone charts, the hospital framework can focus on

measures to prevent their recurrence. This commitment to persistent change and patient

safety aligns perfectly with compliance requirements.

Visual Example - Fishbone Diagram

HS 450 UNIT 7 ASSIGNMENT 4

Executive Summary for CEO and Board of Directors

Control charts and fishbone diagrams are fundamental instruments in quality

administration, directing internal policies, forms, and organizational decisions. The Control

Chart is especially important for observing adherence to industry guidelines through real-time

following of basic measurements. This empowers prompt identification of potential

compliance issues, allowing the hospital framework to instantly require corrective activities

and guarantee full compliance with healthcare controls. The Fishbone Chart serves as a

valuable device to upgrade safety and outcomes. Recognizing the root causes of security

events, the hospital framework can implement evidence-based practices, staff preparation,

and process changes. This proactive approach significantly reduces the likelihood of such

events in the future, subsequently ensuring compliance with patient safety regulations.
HS 450 UNIT 7 ASSIGNMENT 5

Utilizing these tools, the healing center is strongly committed to quality improvement and

patient safety.

Part Two

Ensuring Successful Adoption of a New EHR System

Successful implementation and selection of a modern information system require a

comprehensive arrangement to measure and oversee performance amid the transition. This

arrangement should incorporate benchmarking methods to ensure compliance with healthcare

regulations and upgrade organizational performance. Transitioning from one Electronic

Health Record (EHR) system to another comes with a few challenges, the primary one being

the considerable cost. Expenses include extra personnel from IT, clinicians, specialists, and

resources like databases and legacy system associations. The cost of unused software and

builds includes the monetary burden. Moreover, a successful move requires significant time

commitments and broad training costs, which can be a source of frustration among staff

members.

To facilitate a smoother EHR adoption, it is pivotal to standardize operations and

identify workarounds inside the current framework before the move. Each health system has

interesting forms and characteristics, and addressing these varieties in development is

imperative. For occasion, a move to a new EHR system may affect forms like morning lab

work orders, which can shift over different hospitals within the system. Standardizing these

strategies guarantees a consistent move and minimizes the risk of disturbances to patient care.

Plan for Measuring and Managing Performance

Defining victory criteria from the start is crucial to measure the effectiveness of the

Electronic Health Record (EHR) transition. The arrangement should include the right people,

fitting shapes, viable alter management and reasonable technology. Key components in

determining victory incorporate an effective transition from paper to electronic records and
HS 450 UNIT 7 ASSIGNMENT 6

the on-time usage of the modern EHR system. Setting up milestones and goals to monitor

advance throughout the move handle is basic. Utilizing information examination can offer

assistance in guaranteeing that the starting objectives and breakthroughs are met, agreeing to

the arranged schedule. Particular objectives and points of reference to track advance amid the

EHR move include evaluating the preparation of the healthcare office for EHR

implementation, arranging the approach based on appraisal discoveries, selecting the

appropriate certified EHR system for the clinic, and conducting comprehensive staff

preparation on the modern system. By carefully defining victory criteria and continuously

observing advance, the EHR move can be efficiently overseen, driving a successful and

consistent execution.

Benchmarking Techniques

Benchmarking procedures are fundamental for measuring execution and comparing it

with built-up measures or other organizations. One illustration of such a method is efficiency

benchmarks, which assist in assessing real performance against predefined benchmarks amid

the EHR move (Ahmed et al., 2021). By utilizing these measures, clinics can measure staff

effectiveness, understand hold-up and framework reaction times, and guarantee smooth

operations throughout the move handle. Benchmarking gives important experiences and

permits organizations to recognize ranges for advancement, eventually leading to successful

EHR implementation.

 Example of Productivity Standards:

HS 450 UNIT 7 ASSIGNMENT 7

Dashboards are other sorts of benchmarking methods that show real-time information

and KPIs in an outwardly engaging way. They empower quick identification of ranges

requiring consideration amid the EHR transition. 

Example of a Dashboard:

Benchmarking techniques come in two forms.

HS 450 UNIT 7 ASSIGNMENT 8

Internal benchmarking compares execution inside different units or divisions of the

same organization, and outside benchmarking compares execution with other comparable

organizations or healthcare frameworks within the industry. Inside benchmarking includes

comparing KPIs between clinic units and utilizing visual representations like efficiency

measures, report cards, or dashboards. On the other hand, outside benchmarking utilizes

visual representations to compare KPIs, such as patient satisfaction scores, with comparable

hospitals within the region.

These benchmarking methods are vital in helping the hospital system comply with

healthcare controls, including meeting Meaningful Use criteria. By persistently measuring

and assessing advances, the hospital framework can ensure that they assemble the

fundamental administrative measures. Moreover, benchmarking catalyzes continuous change

in organizational execution. By identifying ranges for advancement and addressing any

inefficiencies, the hospital system can improve patient safety and general quality of care,

driving better patient results.

Part Three

Workflow concepts are essential in overseeing the move to the unused Electronic

Wellbeing Record (EHR) framework. During this usage, it is basic to guarantee that the EHR

framework reliably coordinates with existing organization workflows to preserve operational

proficiency and update understanding of care. Assessing current workflows helps distinguish

potential challenges and zones for enhancement, empowering a smooth move to the unused

system.

Workflow Concept 1: Use Cases

Use cases are principal apparatuses in understanding and speaking to the interactions

between clients and the EHR system to realize particular tasks. In the setting of the EHR

move, use cases outline different scenarios where clinicians, nurses, regulatory staff, and
HS 450 UNIT 7 ASSIGNMENT 9

other clients are associated with the system (Nordo et al., 2019). Each utilized case gives a

detailed step-by-step depiction of the exercises taken and the system's reaction in a particular

situation.

 Example of Use Case Diagram:

Use cases are essential in supporting the viable adoption of an unused Electronic

Health Record (EHR) framework through different means. They play a crucial role in

understanding how the unused EHR system impacts internal policies, forms, and

organizational structure amid the move. By giving a nitty gritty representation of how users

interact with the EHR framework to achieve particular errands, use cases empower a

comprehensive appraisal of the potential impacts of the new system.

One of the primary benefits of analyzing utilized cases is the identification of

potential prepare bottlenecks or inefficiencies in current workflows. This understanding

permits extended managers to proactively address issues sometime in recent execution,

ensuring a smoother transition to the new system. Use cases help outline the parts and duties
HS 450 UNIT 7 ASSIGNMENT 10

of different partners in EHR usage. This guarantees that each client knows their particular

assignments and the effect of the system on their workflow, driving superior collaboration

and responsibility. Utilize cases to give the premise for making tailored preparing programs

for staff. By understanding the particular assignments and exercises required to use the EHR

framework effectively, preparing can be centered on significant scenarios, guaranteeing staff

readiness and confidence amid the move.

Workflow Concept 2: Swim Lane Diagrams

Swim lane diagrams are important for managing the EHR move as they visually

represent different process steps and the mindful stakeholders in each step. By categorizing

the exercises by parts or departments, these diagrams make it simpler to get the entire

workflow and identify areas for enhancement. With clear and organized visuals, healthcare

experts can effectively oversee the EHR move and optimize forms to upgrade patient care

and operational efficiency.

  Example of a Swim Lane Diagram

Swim lane diagrams are critical in supporting decision-making amid the EHR

transition. They give a clear diagram of the workflow and handoffs between different
HS 450 UNIT 7 ASSIGNMENT 11

divisions, highlighting dependencies and potential communication gaps (Carayon &

Wooldridge, 2020). This visual clarity encourages smoother coordination amid usage. Swim

lane graphs help distinguish zones of strife or miscommunication by presenting department

activities side by side. This awareness empowers proactive measures to guarantee efficient

collaboration. These diagrams comprehensively explain how the unused EHR system impacts

different stakeholders. Decision-makers pick up valuable insights into the changes each

division will encounter, leading to better decision-making and risk mitigation.

While both utilize cases and swim lane diagrams are important for managing the EHR

move, they have particular advantages. Use cases give detailed sees of particular users

intuitive and valuable for preparing and process advancement. In contrast, swim path

diagrams offer a broader see of the whole workflow and cross-departmental interactions.

Choosing the appropriate approach depends on the particular needs of the EHR execution.

Use cases are favored for detailed user-centric analysis, while swim lane graphs are more

successful in visualizing the overall process.

Part Four

Project management techniques are vital in ensuring a smooth and proficient

Electronic Health Record (EHR) transition, eventually driving to wanted results and counting

regulatory compliance. One powerful project management instrument is the Gantt chart,

which visually represents project tasks, timelines, and conditions. Using Gantt charts is

fundamental in arranging, planning, and following the EHR implementation as they give a

clear and point-by-point timeline of the project's phases and activities. By breaking the

venture into reasonable errands, group members can effectively grasp their obligations and

due dates, advancing better collaboration and coordination among distinctive partners. This

improved collaboration is crucial for successfully implementing and adjusting the EHR

system to regulatory compliance necessities. The Gantt chart allows venture managers to
HS 450 UNIT 7 ASSIGNMENT 12

monitor advance viably and distinguish potential bottlenecks or delays. With clear

visualizations of errand conditions, any issues can be addressed instantly, guaranteeing that

the venture stays on track and meets its wanted outcomes, counting regulatory compliance.

 Visual Example of a Gantt Chart for EHR Transition

Please refer to the Gantt chart provided below:

This Gantt chart serves as a visual representation of the timeline for the EHR usage

venture, showing major milestones, errands, and their particular lengths. Gantt charts are

profoundly useful in guaranteeing effective workflow and successful results. Extended

supervisors can viably allocate assets by utilizing Gantt charts, considering errand conditions

and timelines. This ensures that the proper team members are assigned to particular tasks at

the appropriate time, optimizing asset utilization. Additionally, identifying task conditions

empowers a smooth workflow, preventing bottlenecks and delays.

Adhering to the Gantt chart timeline is significant because it plans the hospital system

satisfactorily for regulatory reviews at different stages of the EHR move. The system can
HS 450 UNIT 7 ASSIGNMENT 13

meet all compliance necessities and ensure regulatory adherence by remaining on track with

the timeline. Gantt charts help in the timely completion of vital documentation and

announcing, advancing regulatory compliance, and avoiding penalties (Calegari et al., 2020).

Risk examination plays a vital part in the EHR implementation project. It involves identifying

potential risks, evaluating their effect, and developing mitigating techniques. Anticipating

challenges through risk analysis is fundamental for a successful EHR move because it helps

distinguish potential impediments that might influence the project's general victory. The

hospital system can guarantee a smooth EHR implementation handle with minimized

disruptions by tending to and managing risks proactively.

 Visual Example of Risk Analysis Matrix

Please refer to the Risk Analysis Matrix provided below:

The Risk Analysis Matrix categorizes potential risks based on their likelihood and

effect, with high-impact and high-likelihood dangers given the highest need for mitigation.

Conducting a chance examination is basic for extended directors to recognize and prioritize

potential dangers that might affect EHR implementation (Nesaragi et al., 2021). Being

mindful of these dangers permits project managers to devise effective strategies to address

them. By proactively implementing chance moderation measures, disruptions can be

HS 450 UNIT 7 ASSIGNMENT 14

minimized, ensuring the victory of the project. Risk analysis is especially important in

recognizing compliance-related dangers, such as data security breaches or protection

violations, which are basic for achieving administrative compliance. Addressing these

dangers is imperative to safeguard patient data privacy and security. Besides, risk

investigation enables the hospital framework to create contingency plans to handle

unexpected occasions and compliance-related challenges. Having contingency plans

guarantees preparedness and regulatory compliance in unforeseen circumstances.

HS 450 UNIT 7 ASSIGNMENT 15

References

Ahmed, A., Abbasi, A., & Eickhoff, C. (2021). Benchmarking Modern Named Entity

Recognition Techniques for Free-text Health Record Deidentification. AMIA Summits

on Translational Science Proceedings, 2021, 102.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378656/

Calegari, R., Fogliatto, F. S., Lucini, F. R., Anzanello, M. J., & Schaan, B. D. (2020).

Surgery scheduling heuristic considering OR downstream and upstream facilities and

resources. BMC Health Services Research, 20, 1-11.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05555-1

Carayon, P., & Wooldridge, A. R. (2020). Improving patient safety in the patient journey:

contributions from human factors engineering. Women in industrial and systems

engineering: Key advances and perspectives on emerging topics, 275-299.

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-11866-2_12

Litton, E., Guidet, B., & De Lange, D. (2020). National registries: Lessons learned from

quality improvement initiatives in intensive care. Journal of Critical Care, 60, 311-

318. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944120306584

Nesaragi, N., Patidar, S., & Aggarwal, V. (2021). Tensor learning of pointwise mutual

information from EHR data for early sepsis prediction. Computers in biology and

medicine, 134, 104430.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482521002249

Nordo, A. H., Levaux, H. P., Becnel, L. B., Galvez, J., Rao, P., Stem, K., ... & Kush, R. D.

(2019). Use of EHRs data for clinical research: historical progress and current

applications. Learning health systems, 3(1), e10076.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/lrh2.10076
HS 450 UNIT 7 ASSIGNMENT 16

Pletta, K., Moreno, M., Allen, G. S., Sleeth, J., Jain, S., & Kerr, B. (2019). Electronic Health

Record (EHR) Quality Tools Improved and Sustained Use of Asthma Action Plans for

three years in a Primary Care Pediatric System.

https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article-abstract/144/2_MeetingAbstract/

121/3235