Interlocking Paver Blocks
Interlocking Paver Blocks
Interlocking Paver Blocks
net/publication/291233641
CITATIONS READS
18 5,221
4 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Prashanth M H on 30 March 2020.
Abstract: Interlocking concrete block pavers (ICBP) has been extensively used in many of the countries due to
concern with durability. They are utilized in a variety of commercial, municipal and industrial applications. The
superior engineering properties, low maintenance, ease of placement and removal, aesthetic appeal and immediate
availability are the primary reasons for choosing concrete block pavement over other paving surfaces. ICBP are
colored using iron oxide pigments. The present investigation details the properties of ICBPs mixed with iron ore
tailings as a partial replacement for cement. The paper discusses the experimental studies on strength characteristics
and water absorption of iron ore tailings based concrete paver blocks by considering actual area and plan area and
results has been compared with that of conventional concrete paver blocks.
Keywords: Interlocking Concrete Block Paver, Iron Ore Tailing, Plan Area, Actual Area
It is Industrial waste which is obtained for process of Compression test was done using universal compression
mining of iron and steel making industry. Specific testing machine. All the blocks were placed in water for
gravity of Iron-ore tailing is 3.3. a curing period of 7 days and 28 days. The load was
been applied at a constant rate of 15± 3 N/mm2/ minute
Water: until it failed. Compressive strength= (Load/Plan Area)
The water used was clean and free from deleterious x CF, when Plan area is considered Compressive
matter. strength = (Load /Actual Area), when Actual area is
Super plasticizers (High range water reducers): considered
Super plasticizer used in present investigation was 0.25
% by weight of cement.
Composition
submerged in water for 24hrs and were then removed Compressive
Compressive Strength
and then weighed i.e. W2.The water absorption was Strength
(N/mm2)
obtained using the formula [(W2-W1)/W1]x100. (N/mm2 )
Actual Plan
Table 3: Correction Factor for Paver Block Thickness Actual area Plan area
area area
Nominal Correction Factors CO 23.4 22.19 31.91 30.26
block (CF)
A 28.35 26.88 37.11 35.18
Thickness Plain Chamfered
(mm) blocks blocks B 27.35 25.93 35.11 33.29
60 or 65 1 1.06 C 26.66 25.28 34.67 32.87
80 1.12 1.18 D 20.21 19.16 25.34 24.03
100 1.18 1.24 E 21.46 20.35 26.34 24.98
Calculation of Area:
Plan Area:
The plan area of interlocking block is calculated as per
IRC codal guide lines. The block shall be placed facing
up, on the card board and its perimeter is traced with the
pencil and than cut out. The weight of card board is
found as W1 and a rectangle measuring 200 mm x
100mm is cut out of same rectangle and weighed as W 2.
Thus plan area is calculated as,
Plan area= ((100 x 200)*W1)/ W2, mm2
Plan area = ((100x200)*110) / (70) = 31428.5 mm2
Actual Area:
Actual area was calculated by dividing the section into 2 Figure 3: Average Compressive Strength for 7 Days
rectangles 4 triangles and 1 respectively as shown in fig
2.
Actual area =2x (166.2x37.0) +4x (0.5x23.8x23.8) +
(116.2x126.2) = 28096 mm2
addition of iron ore tailing of 5%, 10%, 15% have Results of Water Absorption:
respectively shown increase in the compressive strength
The samples were taken for water absorption test. Test
of pavers. This shows the usage potential of iron ore
was carried out as per BIS guidelines. The water
tailing from 5% to 15%, which can be used under the
absorption has been plotted to different mixes
application of light traffic category which is between 30
(composition) as shown in Figure 5. The tabulated
to 35 N/mm2
values fall below 6% for all mixes (composition) as per
the codal provision for specification for Precast
Concrete Blocks for Paving.
Table 5: Mixes Indicating the Average Percentage of Water Absorption
Composition CO A B C D E
Avg. water absorption (%) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.5
National Workshop on Cost effective Building
Technology, NITK, Surathkal, March 1998
[3] Sampathkumar N.N et al. “Utilization Waste
Tailing in Roofing Tiles & Bricks”, Workshop on
Cost effective Building Technology, NITK,
Surathkal, March 1988.
[4] Shackel.B,”The Design of Interlocking Concrete
Block Pavements for Road Traffic” Proceedings of
1st International conference on Concrete Blocks
Paving, London, pp. 23-32, 1980.
[5] Shackel.B. “Design & Construction of Interlocking
Concrete Block Pavements”, Elsevier Applied
Science, London, pp 229-230, 1990.
[6] Sunil Kumar Jaladi, “Studies on Concrete Hollow
Figure 5: Water Absorption of the Various Mixes Blocks with Iron ore Tailings as Fine Aggregate”,
M. Tech dissertation, Mangalore University, 2001.
Conclusions: [7] Sampath Kumar, N. N” Utilization of Iron ore
In the light of results obtained and observations made Waste Tailings in the Manufacture of Roofing Tiles
during the present experimental investigations, the and Bricks-Preliminary Studies”, Proceedings
following conclusions can be drawn National Workshop on cost effective building
technology ,NITK, Surathkal, Inda,1988.
The strength obtained is more in case of actual area [8] IS 2386 Part-4,” Methods of Test for Aggregates
compared to plan area, indicating the more conservative for Concrete Mechanical Properties”. BIS, New
value for the compressive strength in the plan area. Delhi, India, 1963.
The use of iron ore tailing from 5% to 15% has [9] IS-8112:1989, 43 grade ordinary Portland cement
shown increase in the compressive strength of the specification.
concrete compared to normal concrete. [10] IS-383:1970 specification for coarse aggregates
Mix D and E has shown strength, lower than from sources for cement.
conventional blocks, hence addition of iron ore tailings [11] Ministry of Road Transport & Highway
from 15% to 25% has resulted in lower compression (MORTH)” Specification for Road & Bridge
strength compared to that of conventional blocks. Work.” Indian Road Congress, New Delhi, India,
References: 2001.
[12] Draft IS,” Specification for Precast Concrete
[1] Ravikumar C.M. “Experimental Studies on Blocks for Paving”, Doc: CED 5(6064), April
Interlocking Iron-ore-Tailing Based Paving Tiles”, 2003.
M-Tech (I.S) Thesis, Mangalore University, May-
June 2000. Internet URLs:
[2] Samaga B.R et al. “ Strength Characteristics at http:www.indiamart.com/dagratiles/accessed on date
Elevated Temperatures of Cement Mortar Cubes 04/05/2012
and Iron-ore-Tailings Mortar cubes”, Proceedings http: www.brickblocks.com / products html accessed on
04/05/201