Jurnal Mas Geraldin
Jurnal Mas Geraldin
Jurnal Mas Geraldin
ABSTRACT: Performance is a result achieved by workers in their work according to certain criteria. Employee performance will
be high if it is supported by employee job satisfaction, besides that it is importantwork engagement, work life balance and
organizational culture are factors that must be considered by the company to achieve company goals.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of work engagement, work life balance and organizational culture on
employee performance through job satisfaction of employees of Bank Jatim Branch Dr. Sutomo Surabaya
The population in this study were employees at Bank Jatim Branch Dr. Soetomo Surabaya as many as 90 employees, while the
sample who became respondents in this study was adjusted to as many as 73 respondents.
Based on the results of research using PLS analysis, the following conclusions can be drawn: work engagement has an effect on
employee performance, work life balance has no effect on employee performance, Organizational Culture has an effect on
employee performance, work engagement has no effect on performance through employee job satisfaction, work life balance
does not affect performance through employee job satisfaction, organizational culture influences performance through
employee job satisfaction
Keywords: Work Engagement, Work Life Balance, Organizational Culture, Job Satisfaction, Employee Performance
I. INTRODUCTION
Today's business competition is increasing, every company must be able to carry out an innovation or change that can
help its existence in accordance with the development of changes in an increasingly dynamic technological era. In order to
prepare to be able to adapt to change, the existence of human resources needs attention so that they can contribute to the
performance provided. Performance is a result achieved by workers in their work according to certain criteria. Employee
performance will be high if it is supported by employee job satisfaction. Every company is required to be able to improve the
work ability of its employees.
Wirawan (2019:21) says there are several factors that affect employee performance, namely external environmental
factors, internal employee factors and internal environmental factors. Several internal factors exist in the company, namely,
work engagement is important for every employee in a company. Engagement (attachment) is defined as a person's feeling of
being responsible and concerned about work performance (Britt et al, 2016: 21), while work life balance is a balance between
employee life and personal life so that it runs in balance and can create satisfaction for each individual employee ( Wolor et al.,
2020: 6), Organizational culture is a value that is used as a guide in the behavior of employees in organizations in the daily work
environment. The application of organizational culture is based on the values that are upheld by the company Sukarno & Sutini
(2018), and according to Wibowo (2016: 415) job satisfaction is where everyone who works expects to get satisfaction from
their place of work.
This research was conducted at PT Bank Jatim Branch Dr. Soetomo Surabaya, as the company is the object of this
research. Various considerations to be able to support this research are, one of which is the existence of a research gap in
previous research, where the results of research by Soomro et al. (2018: 23) shows that employee performance is significantly
influenced by work life balance, while research by Chiekezie et al., (2016: 22) does not affect work life balance and worker
performance. The results of other studies Meanwhile, the research gap for research results which states that work engagement
has a positive influence on performance is supported by Madan & Srivastava's research (2015: 44), whereas research on work
engagement relationships has no significant effect on employee performance in employees of a company in Batam (Mahardika
V. HYPOTHESES
Based on the background, the formulation of the problem, research objectives, previous research and the theoretical
basis used can be formulated as follows:
1. Allegedly Work Engagement has a positive effect on performance at PT. Bank Jatim Branch Dr. Sutomo Surabaya
2. Allegedly Work Life Balance has a positive effect on performance at PT. Bank Jatim Branch Dr. Sutomo Surabaya
3. Allegedly Organizational Culture has a positive effect on performance at PT, Bank Jatim Branch Dr. Sutomo
Surabaya
4. Allegedly Work Engagement has a positive effect on performance through job satisfaction at PT. Bank Jatim
Branch Dr. Soetomo
5. Allegedly Work Life Balance has a positive effect on performance through job satisfaction at PT. Bank Jatim
Branch Dr. Soetomo
2. Reliability Test
Composite reliabilityis an index that indicates the extent to which a measuring device can be trusted
to be relied upon. If a tool is used twice to measure the same symptoms and the measurement results
obtained are relatively consistent, then the tool is reliable. In other words, reliability shows a consistency
of measuring devices in the same symptoms. The full results can be seen in the following table.
Value of R2 (Job Satisfaction) = 0.349 This can be interpreted that the model is able to explain the
phenomenon/problem of Job Satisfaction of 34.90%. While the rest (65.10%) is explained by other variables (besides variables
Work Engagement, Work Life Balance, Organizational Culture) that have not been included in the model and errors. It means Job
Satisfaction influenced by the variable Work Engagement, Work Life Balance, Organizational Culture, by 34.90% while 65.10% is
influenced by the variable other.
Value of R2 (Employee Performance) = 0.721, This can be interpreted that the model is able to explain Employee
Performance phenomena/problems of 72.10%. While the rest (27.90%) is explained by other variables (besides the variables
Work Engagement, Work Life Balance, Organizational Culture, and Job Satisfaction) which have not been included in the model
and errors. It means Employee Performance influenced by, the variable Work Engagement, Work Life Balance, Organizational
Culture, Job Satisfaction sas large as 72.10% while 27.90% are affectedby other variables.
2. Results of Inner Weights
a. Direct Influence
b. Indirect Influence
Apart from the direct effect as in the hypothesis testing above, from this modeling it can be
seen the total effect or indirect effect or indirect effect (through mediating variables), as shown in
the following total effect table for hypothesis testing with mediating variables as follows:
Table 5. Total Effects (Mean, STDEV, T-Values)
From the total effect table above it can be concluded that the hypothesis:
1. Work Engagement (X1) has a non-significant effect on Employee Performance through Job Satisfactionwith a path
coefficient of 0.047 where p-values =0.198 smaller than the value of α = 0.05 (5%)
2. Work Life Balance (X2) has a non-significant effect on Employee Performance through Job Satisfactionwith a path
coefficient of -0.008 where p-values=0.780 more big of value α = 0.05(5%)
3. Digital marketing(X2) has a positive effect on brand image (Y) through brand image (Z) as a mediating variable that
is acceptable, with a T-statistic value of 2,874 greater than the value of α = 0.05 (5%) = 1.96 , with a value p value of
0.001 which is less than 0.05, then it is significant (positive).
The results of the study show that Work Engagement has a positive effect on performance. The better the Work
Engagement, the better the impact on performance. Employee dedication is the biggest indicatorthat is equal to (0.815) affect
work engagement. This form of loyalty is able to make employees focus and they have attachment to their job descriptions so
that by having this attachment employees have full responsibility for completing their work. These results support the research
conductedChandra and Madiono (2017), Handoyo and Setiawan (2017), namely "Determinants of Work Engagement and their
impact on employee performance" which states that Work Engagement has a positive and significant effect on performance.
The results of this study indicate that Organizational Culture has a positive effect on performance. With a
strong organizational culture, it will have an impact on the resulting performance. Team orientation is the biggest
indicator of organizational culture variable (0.725). The importance of a teamwork is able to achieve the targets set
The results of this study indicate that Work Engagement has no positive effect on Performance through Job
Satisfaction. This is indicated by the existence of a psychological bond between employees and the company so that
employees feel their job satisfaction will be achieved in terms of the results of what they do, employees work
optimally so that their performance is achieved. Resultsthis research is not in accordance with research by Sayekti
(2020) which shows that the Work Engagement variable has a positive effect on employee performance through job
satisfaction.
The results of this study indicate that Work Life Balance has no positive effect on performance through job
satisfaction. The existence of a work agreement between employees and the company is a form of commitment in
the form of professionalism shown by employees, which will later become an award given by the company, so that
employees think that the balance involvement they give to the company will also have an impact on their
performance, and will get rewarded for what they give to the company. The results of this study are not in
accordance withWeerakkody et al. (2017) proved that job satisfaction managed to mediate work-life balance
variables with performance variables.
The results of this study indicate that Organizational Culture influences performance through Job
Satisfaction. Shown with a team orientation to be a catalyst, with a strong team orientation, having the
same vision, and being able to work well together makes employees feel satisfied, and can make a good
contribution so that performance can be achieved. The results of this studyaccording to research by
Fadlallh (2015) shows that there is a positive and statistically significant relationship between the factors of
job satisfaction and employee performance.
Based on the test results using PLS analysis, to test the effect of several variables on brand equity, the following
conclusions can be drawn:
1. Work Engagement has a positive effect on performance. Employee dedication is the biggest indicator in the Work
Engagement variable. This form of employee service is able to prove that having an attachment to work is a form of
employee contribution to the responsibilities at work.
2. Work Life Balance has no significant effect. Balance of work involvement is the biggest indicator. The work agreement is a
basis for commitment between employees and the company so that at certain moments employees put aside their
personal lives.
3. Organizational Culture has a positive effect on Performance. With a strong organizational culture, it will have an impact
on performance. With team orientation, able to achieve targets set by the company.
4. Work Engagement has no positive effect on Performance through Job Satisfaction. With the existence of a psychological
bond between employees and the company so that employees feel their job satisfaction will be achieved, it can be seen
from the results of what they do, employees work optimally so that their performance is achieved
5. Work Life Balance has no positive effect on Performance through Job Satisfaction. With a balance of involvement,
employees direct their professionalism towards the company, at certain moments employees put aside their personal
lives in order to contribute to the company, which will get rewards according to what they give to the company
6. Organizational Culture has a positive effect on Performance through Job Satisfaction. with a strong team
orientation, having the same vision, and being able to work well together makes employees feel satisfied, and
can make a good contribution so that performance can be achieved.
REFERENCES
1) Chiekezie, OM, Nzewi, HN, Emejulu, GA, & Chukwujama, CN 2016. Work Life Balance and Job Performance in Selected
Commercial Banks in Anambra State, Nigeria. EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review, 4(6).
Retrieved fromwww.eprawisdom.com
2) Delecta, P. 2016. Work Life Balance. International Journal of Current Research, 33(4), 186-189. Retrieved from
Researchgate..
3) Dewantara, MT, & Wulanyani, NMS (2019). The Effect of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Justice on Employee
Engagement at Private Hotel X in Bali. Udayana Journal of Psychology, 6(02), 312–319.
4) Dina, D. 2018. The Effect of Work-Life Balance on Employee Performance at KUD Minatani Brondong Lamongan.
Indonesian Journal of Development, 17(2), 184–199.
5) Fadlallh, AWA 2015. Impact of Job Satisfaction on Employees Performance an Application on Faculty of Science and
Humanity Studies University of Salman Bin Abdul-Aziz-Al Aflaj. International Journal of Innovation and Research in
Educational Sciences, Vol 2 no (1). pp. 26–32.
6) Farha, Soebandono, JP, & Fuady, A. 2017. The Role of Job Satisfaction as a Mediator Between Work-Life Balance on
Organizational Commitment to Employees at PT. X. Estuary Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, 1(2), 213–
220.
7) Ghozali. Imam (2016). Multivariete Analysis Application With IBM SPSS Program. Semarang: Diponegoro University
Publishing Agency
8) Hamid, A., & Hazriyanto. 2019. The Effect of Job Satisfaction on Employee Performance at PT. Aker Solutions Batam.
Journal of Benefita, 4(2), 326 - 335.
9) Inuwa.. Mohammed 2017. Job Satisfaction and Employee Performance of Greek Banking Staff: An Empirical
Investigation. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, Acta Unive(December)
10) Lingga, USA 2020. The Effect of Work-Family Balance and Employee Job Satisfaction on Career Paths. Business
Management, 6(2), 1134–1137.
11) Lockwood in Aisyah 2016. Employee Engagement, SHRM Research Briefly Stated. P.98.
12) Lu, L, Lu, A, C, C, Gursoy, D, & Neale, N, R 2016, 'Work Engagement, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover Intentions (A
Comparison Between Supervisors and Line-Level Employees) International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality ',
Management, Vol. 28 No. 4, 737-761.
13) Mendis, MDVS, & Weerakkody, WAS 2018. The impact of work life balance on employee performance with reference
to the telecommunication industry in Sri Lanka: a mediation model. Kelaniya Journal of Human Resource
Management, 12(1), 72.https://doi.org/10.4038/kjhrm.v12i1.42
14) Meutia, KI, Husada, C., Dan, O., Organization, K., Performance, T., & Journal, K. (2019). The influence of organizational