SELECTED ESSAYS

BY

T. S. ELIOT

LONDON
FABER- AND.FABER LIMITED
24 RUSSELL SQUARE
 TRADITION AND THE
INDIVIDUAL TALENT
I

I n English writing we seldom speak of tradItIOn, though

we occasionally apply its name in deploring its absence.
We cannot refer to 'the tradrtion' or to 'a tradItion'; at
most, we employ the adjective in saying that the poetry of
So-and-su is 'tradItional' or even 'too traditional'. Seldom,
perhaps, does the word appear except m a phrase of cen-
sure. If otherWIse, it is vaguely approbative, WIth the im-
plication, as to the work approved, of some pleasing archae-
ological reconstruction. You can hardly make the word
agreeable to Enghsh ears without this comfortable refer-
e;nce to the reassuring science of archaeology.
CertaInly the word is not lIkely to appear in our appre-
ciatIOns ofhvmg or dead writers. Every natIOn, every race,
MS not only Its own creative, but its own cntical turn of
mmd; and IS even more obhvious of the shortcomings and
limitations of its critical habits than of those of its creative
gen~us. We know, or thmk we know, from the enormous
mass of CrItIcal wnting that has appeared in the French
language the critical method or habit of the Prench; we
only conclude (we are such unconscious people) that the
French are 'more critIcal' than we, and sometimes even
plume ourselves a little WIth the fact, as 1f the French were
the less spontaneous. Perhaps they are; but we might re-
rrnnd ourselves that crItlcism is as mevitable as breathing,
and that we should be none the worse for articulatlllg what
passes in our mmas when we read a book and feel an..
emotion about it, for criticizmg our own minds in theIr',.,
13
 INDIVIDUAL TALENT
No poet, no artist of any !!:!t, has his complete meaning
alone. HIs sIgnificance, ,his appreciation is the appreciatio!l
of his relation to the dead poets and artists. You cann,?t
v.?-lue him alone; you must set him, for contrast and com-
parison, among the dead._I mean this as a principle of aes-
thetIc, not merely historical, critIcism. The necessity that
he shall conform, that he shall cohere, IS not onesided; what
happens when a new work of art is created is something
that happel'!S SImultaneously to all the works of art which
preceded it. The eXlstll1g monuments form an Ideal order
among themselves, which is modIfied by the introduction
of the new (the really new) work of art among them. The
existing order is complete before the new work arrives;
for order to persIst after the supervention of novelty, the
whole existing order must be, If ever so slightly, altered;
and so the relations, proportIons, 'tralues of each work of
art toward the whole are readjusted; and thIs IS conformity
between the old and the new. Whoever has approved this
idea of order, of the form of European, of Enghsh lited--
ture will not find it preposterous that the past should be
~ltered by the present as much as the present is dIrected by
the past. And the poet who IS aware of this will be aware
of great difficulties and responsibilities.
In a peculiar sense he will be aware also that he must in-
evitably be judged by the standards of the past. I say judged,
not amputated, by them; not judged to be as good as, or
worse or better than, the dead; and certainly not judged by
the canons of dead critIcs. It is a judgment, a companson,
m which two thIngs are measured by each other.To con-
form merely would be for the new work not really to con-
form at all; It would not be new, and would therefore not
be a work of art. And we do not quite say that the new is
more valuable because it fits in; but Its fitting in IS a test of
its value-a test, it is true, wlnch can only be slowly and
cautIously applied. for we are none of us infalhble judges
of conformity. Wt; :,ay: it appears to conform, and IS per-
haps indIVIdual, or it appears mdIvidual, and may con-
IS
 TRADITION AND THE
form; but we are hardly hkely to find that It is one and not
the other.
To proceed to a more Ultelhgible expositIon of the rela-
tion of the poet to the past: he can neIther take the past as a
lum-p, an mdiscrirrunate bolus, nor can he form himself
wholly on one or two prIvate admIrations, nor can he form
himself wholly upon one preferred penod. The first course
is madffilsslble, the second is an Important experience of
youth, and the thIrd IS a pleasant and hIghly d~sirable sup-
plement. The poet must be very consclOUS of the maUl cu~­
rent, wruch does not at all flow invarIably through the most
dIstIngUIshed reputatlOns. He must be qUIte aware of the
obvious fact that art never Improves, but that the materIal
of art IS never qUlte the same. He must be aware that the
mind of Europe-the mind of rus own country..('-a mind
whIch he learns in tIme. to be much more Important than
rus own private mind-Is a mmd whIch changes, and that
t!u.s change IS a development which abandons nothing en
route, which does not superannuate eIther Shakespeare, or
Homer, or the rock drawing of the Magdaleruan draughts-
men. That this development, refinement perhaps, comph",:'
catIon certamly, IS not, from the point of VIew of the
artIst, any Improvement. Perhaps not even an improve-
ment from the point of VIew of the psychologIst or not to
the extent whrch we Imagme; perhaps only ill the end
based upon a comphcatton In economics and machinery.
But the drfference between the present and the past is that
the conscious present IS an awareness of the past In a way
and to an e::{tent which the past's awareness of Itself cannot
show.
Someone said: 'The dead Writers are remote from us
because we know 'so much more than they dIu'. PreCIsely,
and they are that wruch we know.
I am alIve to a usual objectlon to what IS clearly part of
my programme for the metier of poetry. The objectIon is
that the doctrl1le reqUIres a ndiculous amount of erudItIon
(pedantry), a claIm wruch can be rejected by appeal to the
16
 INDIVIDUAL TALENT
hves of poets in any pantheon. It will even be affirmed that
much learrung deadens or perverts poetic sensibility.While,
however, we persist m behevmg that a poet ought to know
as much as wIll not encroach upon lus necessary receptivity
and necessary lazmess, It is not desIrable to confine know-
ledge to whatever can be put Into a useful shape for exami-
nations, drawing-rooms, or the snll more pretentious
modes of publicity. Some can absorb knowledge, the more
tardy must ,sweat for it. Shakespeare acquired more essen-
tial history from Plutarch than most men could from the
whole Bnnsh Museum. What IS to be inslsted upon IS that
the poet must develop or procure the consciousness of the
past and that he should continue to develop trus COnsClOUS-
ness throughout lus career.
Wha1i happens is a continual surrender of himself as he IS
at the moment to somethmg~whlch IS more valuable. The
progress of an artist is a continual ~self-sacrifi.ce, a continual
extinction of personahty.
There remains to define this process of depersonalizatliI!}
and Its relation to the sense of traditIon. It IS in tlus deper-
sonahzatlon that art may be said to approach the condltlon
of SCIence. I therefore mVIte you to consIder, as a suggestive
analogy, the acnon which takes place when a bit of fInely
filiated platrnu.Ll.l IS mtroduced mto a chamber containrng
oxygen and sulphur dioxide.
II
Honest criticism and senSItive apprecIation IS chrected
not upon the poet but upon the poetry. Ifwe attend to the
confused cries of the newspaper critIcs and the susurrus of
popular repetltlOn that follows, we shall hear the names of
poets in great numbers; If we seek not Blue-book know-
ledge but the enjoyment of poetry, and ask for a poem, we
shall seldom find It. I have tried to pomt out the importance
of the relatIon of the poem to other poems by other authors,
and suggested tne conceptIon of poetry as a living whole
of all the poetry that has ever been wntten. The other aspe",.:;"(
B 17 E.S.E.
 TRADITION AND THE
of this Impersonal theory of poetry is the relatIon of the
poem to its author. And I runted, by an analogy, that the
mind of the mature poet differs from that of the imrnature
one not precisely 1n any valuation of 'personalIty', not
being necessarIly more 1ntereStIng, or hav1ng 'more to say',
but rather by being a more finely perfected medium in
which spec1al, or very varied, feelings are at hberty to enter
into new combinations.
The analogy was that of the catalyst. WMn the two
gases previously mentioned are mixed in the presence of ~
filament of platinum, they form sulphurous aC1d. ThIS
combmation takes place only if the platinum 1S present;
nevertheless the newly formed acid contains no trace of
platinum, and the platinum itself is apparently unaffected:
has remained inert, neutral, and unchanged. The ;nund of
the poet is the shred of platiilUm. It nlaY partly or exclu-
sively operate upon the experience of the man rums elf; but,
the more p~rfect the artist, the more completely separate in
hi:n WIll be the man who suffers and the mind which
creates; the more perfectly will the mmd digest and trans-
mute the passions wruch are 1ts material.
The experience, you will notice, the elements which
enter the presence of the transformlng catalyst, are of two
kinds: emotlOns and feelings. The effect of a work of art
upon the person who enjoys it is an experIence dlfferent in
kind from any experience not of art. It may be formed out
of one emotion, or may be a combinat10n of several; and
various feelings, inherIng for the WrIter in particular words
or phrases 01:. 1mages, may be added to compose the final
result. Or great poetry may be made WIthout the direct
use of any emotion whatever: composed out of feelings
solely. Canto XV of the InJerno (Brunetto LatIni) 1S a work-
mg up of the emotion evident in the situation; but the
effect, though single as that of any work of art, is obtained
by considerable complexity of detau. The last quatrain
gives an image, a feeling attachlng tv an Image, which
'~ame', which dId not develop simply out of what pre-
rS
 INDIVIDUAL TALENT
cedes, but whIch was probably in suspenslOn in. the poet's
mind until the proper combmation arnved for it to add
Itself to. The poet's mmd is in fact a receptacle for seizmg
and storing up numberless feelings, phrases, Images, WIDch
remam there untIl all the particles which can unite to form
a new compound are present together.
If you compare several representative passages of the
greatest poetry you see how great is the variety of types of
co mbmatio!J. , and also how completely any semI-ethIcal
criterion of 'sublimity' misses the mark. For it IS not the
'greatness', the intensIty, of the emotIOns, the COlnponents,
but the IntensIty of the artistic process, the pressure, so to
speak, under which the fusion takes place, that counts. The
episode of Paolo and Francesca employs a definite emOtion,
but the intensity of the poetry is somedung qUlte different
from whatever intensity in the sup.l?0sed experience it may
gIve the impression of It is no more mtense, furthermore,
than Canto XXVI, the voyage of Ulysses, whi"ch has not
the mrect dependence upon an emotion. Great variety ~s"
possible in the process of transmutation of emotion: the
murder of Agamemnon, or the agony of Othello, gives an
artistic effect apparently closer to a possible original than
the scenes fro:p1. Dante. In the Agamemnon, the arnstic
e-n:1otion approXImates to the emotion of an actual spec-
tator; in Othello to the emotion of the protagonist rum-
self. But the drtference between art and the event is always
absolute; the combination which is the murder of Aga-
memnon is probably as complex as that whIch is the voyage
of Ulysses. In either case there has been a fusion of elements.
The ode of Keats contains a number of feelmgs which have
nothing particular to do wIth the lllghtingale, but whIch
the nightIngale. partly perhaps because of its attractive
name, q.nd partly because of Its reputation, served to bring
together.
The point of view whIch I am struggling to attack is
perhaps related to tne metaphysical theory of the substan-
tial unity of the soul: for m.y meaning is, that the poet ha~
19
 TRADITION AND THE
not: a 'personahty' to express, but: a part:Icular lllechum,
wluch is only a medimn and not a personalIty, In which
impressions and experiences cOlllbine i l l pecuhar and un-
expected ways. Impressions and experiences which are Im-
portant for the lllan may take no place in the poetry, and
those wluch becollle iInportant 1U the poetry may play
quite aneghgible part in the man, the personahty.
I wIll quote a passage which is mUaUllhar enough to be
regarded WIth fresh attention In the lIght-or clarkness-of
these observations:
And now methinks I could e'en chide myself
For doating on her beauty J though her death
Shall be revenged after no common action.
Does the silkworm expend her yellow labours
For thee? For thee do.es she undo herself? ;
Are lordships so-!.d to maintain ladyships
Por the poor benljit of a bewildering minute?
Why does yonfellow falsify highwaysJ
And put his life between thejudge's lips,
To refine such a thing-keeps horse and men
To beat their valoursfor her? .•.
In t:his passage (as is evident: if It is t:akell.- in its context)
there is a combmanon of posItive and neganve em.otion!;:
an intensely strong attraction toward beauty and an equally
intense fascination by t:he ugliness which 1S contrasted with
it and which dest:roys It. This balance of contrasted em.o-
cion IS m the dramat:Ic situatIon to which the speech IS per-
tinent, but that situation alone is inadequate to It. Tlus is,
so to speak, the structural emotion, provided by the dram.a.
But the whole effect, the doIninant tone, IS due to the fact
that a nUlllber of floating feehngs, having an alfmity to this
emotion by no means superficially eVIdent, have cO.1TIbined
wIth it to give us a new art elllotion.
It is not in his personal emotions, the emotions provoked
by particular events in his life, that the poet is in any way
~emarkable or interesting. His particular emonons may be
20
 INDIVIDUAL TALENT
simple, or crude, or :flat. The emo't!ion in his poetry will be
a very complex trung, but not wIth the complexity of the
emotlOns of people who have very complex or unusual
emotions in hfe. One error, 1ll fact, of eccentricity in poetry
is to seek for new human emotions to express; and in this
search for novelty in the wrong place it dlscovers the per-
verse. The busmess of the poet IS not to find new emotions,
but to use the ordinary ones and, in working them up into
poetry, to e?Cpress feehngs which are not in actual emotions
at all. And emotlOns which he has never experienced wIll
serve his turn as well as those farmhar to him. Consequent-
ly, we must believe that 'emotion recollected in tranquil-
hty' is an inexact formula. For It is neIther emotIon, nor
recollection, nor, WIthout dlstortIon of mearung, tranquil-
lity. It IS a concentratlon, and a new thIng resultmg trom
the concentratlOn, of a very great number of experiences
wruch to the practical and active pe.rson would not seem to
be experiences at all; It IS a concentration which does not
happen consciously or of deliberatton. These experiences~
are not 'recollected', and they finally unite in an atmosphere
wruch is 'tranquil' only in that It is a passive attendlng upon
the event. Of course this IS not quite the whole story. There
is a great deal, in the writing of poetry, wruch must be con-
scious and delib-aate. In fact, the bad poet is usually uncon-
SCIOUS where he ought to be conscious, and conscious where
he ought to be unconscious. Both errors tend to make rum
'personal'. Poetry is not a turning loose of emOtion, but an
escape from emotion; It is not the expression of person-
ahty, but an escape from personality. But, of course, only
those who have personahty and emotions know what It
means to want to escape from these thmgs.

III
.) 8€ YOU. iCTWi 8(Lonpcw 1'4 Ka~ d.7T"a.O~i fCTTU'.

Trus essay propo:ioeS to halt at the frontter of metaphYSICS

or mystIcism, and confine itself to such practIcal concluo::!
21
TRADITION AND INDIVIDUAL TALENT
sions as can be applied 1-y the responsible persoll interested
In poetry. To dlvert mterest from the poet to the poetry is
a laudable aIm: for it would conduce to ajuster estimation
of actual poetry, good and bad. There are many people
who appreciate the expression of sincere emotion In verse,
and there is a smaller number of people who can appre-
ciate techrucal excellence. Bnt very few know when there
is an expression of significant enlorion, emotion which has
its lIfe in the poem and not in the lnstory of the poet. The
emotion of art is impersonal. And the poet calIDot reach
thts impersonahty without surrendering himself wholly to
the work to be done. And he is not hkely to know what IS
to be done unless he hves in what is not merely the present,
but the present moment of the past, unless he is conscIOUS,
not of what is dead, but of what is already living.

22