Prevention/mitigation of Natural Disasters in Urban Areas: Review Open Access
Prevention/mitigation of Natural Disasters in Urban Areas: Review Open Access
Prevention/mitigation of Natural Disasters in Urban Areas: Review Open Access
Abstract
Preventing/mitigating natural disasters in urban areas can indirectly be part of the 17 sustainable economic and social
development intentions according to the United Nations in 2015. Four types of natural disasters—flooding, heavy
rain-induced slope failures/landslides; earthquakes causing structure failure/collapse, and land subsidence—are
briefly considered in this article. With the increased frequency of climate change-induced extreme weathers,
the numbers of flooding and heavy rain-induced slope failures/landslides in urban areas has increased in recent years.
There are both engineering methods to prevent their occurrence, and more effectively early prediction and warning
systems to mitigate the resulting damage. However, earthquakes still cannot be predicted to an extent that is suffi‑
cient to avoid damage, and developing and adopting structures that are resilient against earthquakes, that is, struc‑
tures featuring earthquake resistance, vibration damping, and seismic isolation, are essential tasks for sustainable city
development. Land subsidence results from human activity, and is mainly due to excessive pumping of groundwater,
which is a “natural” disaster caused by human activity. Countermeasures include effective regional and/or national
freshwater management and local water recycling to avoid excessive pumping the groundwater. Finally, perspec‑
tives for risk warning and hazard prevention through enhanced field monitoring, risk assessment with multi-criteria
decision-making (MCDM), and artificial intelligence (AI) technology.
Keywords Preventing natural disasters, Sustainable urban development, Flooding, Slope failure, Earthquake, land
subsidence
© The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which
permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the
original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or
other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line
to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory
regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this
licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Chai and Wu Smart Construction and Sustainable Cities (2023) 1:4 Page 2 of 16
(September 2021), extreme weather-induced natural the Kuma River basin region, Kumamoto, Japan, with an
hazards have increased fivefold within the last 50 years. accumulated rainfall of 400–500 mm, which caused the
To maintain the sustainable development of cities, it is collapse of the bank of the Kuma River and serious flood-
essential to consider the countermeasures for prevent- ing in the area. This flood caused 65 casualties; 2 people
ing/mitigating natural disasters in the city planning and were missing, 557 houses were completely destroyed, 43
construction stages. were partially destroyed, 5,895 were flooded above the
In this article, the major natural disasters related to beds on the first floor, and 1,990 were flooded below the
urban areas are discussed. The natural disasters consid- beds on the first floor [10].
ered are: flooding, heavy rain-induced slope failure (for
cities adjacent to hills/mountains); earthquakes causing
structure failure/collapse, and land subsidence (which is 2.2 Countermeasures
regarded as a natural disaster here despite being caused
mainly by human involvement). For each type of disas- (1) Natural flood management (NFM)
ter, first, its characteristics in recent years are described
with some examples, and then the countermeasures are NFM emphasises by protecting, restoring, and emu-
discussed. lating the natural processes such as catchments, flood-
To facilitate this review article, research publications plains, rivers and the coastlines to reduce the potential
related to the four natural disaster types from the Web for flooding or mitigate the effects of floods [11].
of Science database from 2012 to 2021 were downloaded One of the main reasons for the flood that occurred
and analysed using VOSviewer [6]. The results of a brief in Yamagata Prefecture, Japan, on 30 August 2022 was
bibliometric analysis are presented at the end of each poor maintenance resulting in many agricultural ponds
topic. (Nippon Hoso Kyokai (NHK) news, 1 September 2022).
(b) Create detailed high-accuracy flood hazard maps, Table 1 Top 10 journals in which flooding-related research
educate residents to understand them, and effec- papers were published from 2012 to 2021
tively use them for evacuation. Journal title Publications
Water 342
Natural Hazards 263
2.3 Brief bibliometric analysis results
Journal of Hydrology 205
Sustainability 198
(1) Identified Research cluster
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 130
Science of the Total Environment 122
The search strategy code was theme = (flooding) AND
Natural Hazard and Earth System Sciences 116
((urban area). The four top research clusters were iden-
Remote Sensing 96
tified as follows:
Journal of Flood Risk Management 94
Environmental Earth Sciences 62
Cluster 1: flood vulnerability (e.g. [14–18]).
Cluster 2: urban flood management and mitigation
(e.g. [19–27]). around US$ 4.5 billion per year, US$ 2.6 billion per year,
Cluster 3: simulation of flood evolution and inunda- respectively. Landslide activity is increasing because of
tion (e.g. [28–36]). changing climate patterns result in increased regional
Cluster 4: leading cause of urban flooding (e.g. [37–45]). precipitation [47]. In recent years, the number of rain-
Number of publications and top 10 journals publish-
fall-induced slope collapses and landslides has increased
ing the papers. owing to the increased frequencies of extreme rainfalls.
The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and
Figure 1 shows the yearly number of research articles Tourism (MLIT), Japan [48] reported that the total num-
related to urban flooding published from 2012 to 2021. ber of sediment disasters that occurred in Japan in 2018
The number of articles has increased because of the was 3,459, of which approximately 70% were rainfall-
increasing number of floods caused by extreme rainfall induced landslides and slope collapses. There were 161
since the 2010s [46]. Table 1 shows the top ten journals in casualties and 117 injuries.
which research papers related to flooding were published. Many cities are located in landslide-prone areas, such
as Hong Kong, where landslides and slope failures occur
3 Rainfall‑induced slope failures/landslides almost every year [49]. The most famous landslides in
3.1 Occurrence and social impacts Hong Kong were a string of large landslides that occurred
Schuster [47] reported that the annual economic losses in June 1972 [50]. The landslides occurred because of the
attributable to slope fluctuations in Japan and Italy are severe rain that pounded Hong Kong in the days lead-
ing up to them. It is estimated that at least 156 people
were killed, and several apartment buildings and houses
were destroyed. Particularly, a "mammoth" downpour
of around 640 mm in 72 h precipitated the tragedies on
18 June 1972, which resulted in the collapse of a luxury
block in the Mid-Levels and the loss of 67 lives.
At around 10:30 am (JST) on 3 July 2021, a large-scale
slope failure and debris flow occurred in the Aibatsu
River in the mountain district of Izu, Atami City, Shi-
zuoka Prefecture, Japan [51]. 27 people died (includ-
ing one disaster-related death, and one missing person).
According to the Japan Meteorological Agency, 2–3 days
before the disaster, warm and moist air flowed continu-
ously toward a stagnant front from western to eastern of
Japan, and the atmospheric conditions became extremely
unstable at the site. At the observation point in Ajiro,
Atami City, which was relatively close to the site, 321 mm
of precipitation was recorded in 48 h, ending at 3:20 pm
Fig. 1 Number of publications on flooding disasters on 3 July. Upstream of the river, there was land developed
Chai and Wu Smart Construction and Sustainable Cities (2023) 1:4 Page 4 of 16
where α is slope angle; Z is the depth of potential failure; characteristics under unsaturated conditions, that is, soil
γ is the unit weight of soil; c’ is the cohesion intercept water characteristic curve (SWCC) and permeability
under effective stress, and φ’ denotes the effective stress functions, are required. Figures 2 and 3 show the typical
angle of the soil’s resistance to shearing. If SFd ≤ 1, a land- SWCC and permeability functions of unsaturated soils
slide may be induced at a depth Z due to a decrease in the [54].
initial suction caused by rainwater infiltration. If SFd > 1, The most commonly used SWCC functions are those
landslides can only occur when the potential failure sur- proposed by Van Genuchten [55] and by Fredlund and
face is subjected to positive pore water pressures due to Xing [56]. Although several permeability functions exist
rainfall. in the literature, a generally adopted method is to deduce
To predict rainfall-induced landslides, rainfall pre- them from SWCC functions,for example, the perme-
cipitation (seepage) analysis and/or coupled seepage and ability function [57] can be combined with and SWCC
stress–strain analysis of unsaturated soil slopes must be function [55], which has an explicit expression,and Fred-
performed [54], in which numerical simulations, such as lund et al.’s [58] method, which does not have an explicit
finite difference or finite element methods, are normally expression (an integration form). In these mathematical
required. These techniques are described elsewhere and functions, fitting parameters must be determined using
will not be explained here. To perform this type of analy- measured data. However, to measure the SWCCs of
sis, hydromechanical properties, especially soil hydraulic soils, special equipment is required, and this process is
Chai and Wu Smart Construction and Sustainable Cities (2023) 1:4 Page 5 of 16
time-consuming (sometimes it may take several months). Deep-seated rainfall-induced slope failures are more
Therefore, in routing geotechnical site investigations, difficult to predict. They are mainly influenced by the
measuring the SWCCs of soils is not included. This type hydrogeology of a slope, and sometimes a site investiga-
of situation limits or restricts the application of unsatu- tion cannot reveal all the relevant details.
rated soil mechanics in geotechnical designs. To provide
a pragmatic solution, Chai and Gao [59] and Gao and 3.3 Methods for preventing/mitigating rainfall‑induced
Chai [60] proposed empirical methods to estimate the fit- slope failure
ting parameters in the SWCCs of Fredlund and Xing [56]
and Van Genuchten [55] using easily measured basic soil (1) Engineering/vegetation methods
properties, such as saturated permeability, grain size dis-
tribution curve, and plastic index. It is believed that this (a) Failure of shallow slopes caused by rainfall
type of estimation can effectively promote the applica-
tion of unsaturated soil mechanics in predicting rainfall- For rainfall-induced shallow slope failures, the most
induced slope failure or landslides. effective countermeasures are: (i) increasing the vegeta-
Several factors influence rainfall-induced shallow slope tion of a slope, and (ii) making the slope angle gentler.
failures. Except for the geometry and hydromechanical Other engineering methods include spraying a thin layer
properties of the slope, the most important factors are of concrete on the slope and rebar insertion methods
the rainfall rate, rainfall duration, and initial moisture [61].
content of the slope soil preceding a rainstorm. Figure 4
illustrates a chart for predicting whether rainfall will (b) Failure of deep-seated slope
induce a shallow slope failure. In the figure, the “lower”
and “higher” initial moisture contents are qualitative or Countermeasures could be classified into two cat-
relative conditions. Defining precise values is considered egories: methods of increasing the shear strength on a
impractical. For a given slope, the type of chart can be potential slip surface and/or reducing the driving force
proposed by using the hydromechanical characteristics (moment) of a slope; and methods increasing the resist-
of the slope soil and the findings of precipitation analy- ance force (moment) using other structures. The former
sis. In a region, the natural slopes may have different methods include improving drainage systems for surface
slope angles, different thicknesses of weathered soil lay- water and groundwater, removing certain soils from the
ers, and different vegetation conditions. In practice, the upward part of a slope, and adding certain soils at the toe
slopes can be classified into several groups, and a predic- of a slope. The latter methods include the anchor, resist-
tion chart for each group can be proposed. Then, using ance pile, and retaining wall methods [62]. Normally,
weather forecast information on the rainfall rate and these methods are applied when there is a sign of slope
duration, possible rainfall-induced slope failures can be instability.
predicted.
(2) Soft methods
Cluster 2: landslide susceptibility evaluation (LSA) Table 2 Top 10 journals in which landslide-related research
(e.g. [69–71]). papers were published from 2012 to 2021
Cluster 3: prediction of rainfall-induced shallow Journal title Publications
landslides (e.g. [72–79]).
Cluster 4: soil erosion and landslide-type debris flow Landslides 349
(e.g. [12, 80–83]). Engineering Geology 197
Number of publications and top 10 journals publish- Natural Hazards 163
ing the papers Environmental Earth Sciences 147
Geomorphology 141
Figure 5 presents the number of publications on rain- Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 118
fall-induced landslides from 2012 to 2021. From 2014 Water 89
to 2021, the number of related papers rapidly increased, Journal of Mountain Science 85
indicating increased research activity in this area. Table 2 Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 78
lists the top 10 journals in which landslide-related papers Catena 73
were published from 2012 to 2021.
in bedrock (e.g. [86]. Although there have been some
“successful” predictions, such as the Haicheng earthquake
4 Earthquake
in 1975 (M 7.3) in China [87], generally, earthquakes still
4.1 Occurrence and social impacts
cannot be predicted precisely enough to avoid damage.
It is commonly accepted that an earthquake is normally
The World health Organization [88] reported that nearly
caused by “elastic rebound” of Earth’s crust, a theory pro-
750, 000 people worldwide died as a result of earthquakes
posed by Reid [84]. This theory states that a major cause
between 1998–2017. In the emergency phase of the dis-
of earthquakes is deformation due to external forces,
aster, more than 125 million people were injured, made
primarily regional tectonic pressures. When the total
homeless or displaced affected by earthquakes during
amount of strain (energy) at a critical spot surpasses the
this period. If an earthquake occurs in a highly populated
capacity of the rock to withstand further strain, an earth-
urban area, the damage to human lives and property is
quake will occur due to brittle fractures in competent
much larger than that in a rural area. To reduce or miti-
rock or slip on preexisting weak zones. An earthquake
gate possible earthquake-induced damage, developing
fault is a region where the slip or displacement occurs
resilient structures for houses and public buildings has
[85].
become a very important topic of research and city plan-
Considerable attempts have already been made to pre-
ning strategy for sustainable city development.
dict the occurrence of an earthquake using observations
of abnormal animal activities as well as monitored strain
4.2 Resilient structures
MLIT [89], Japan, published the “Basis of Structural
Design for Buildings and Public Works”, which stated that
there are three basic performance requirements:
Japan is an earthquake-prone country because it The search strategy code was theme = (earthquake or
lies in the boundary region between the Eurasian and temblor or seism or quake) AND ((urban area). The four
Pacific plates, and tectonic movement of the Plates top research clusters are as follows:
causes earthquakes as well as active volcanoes. It is well
known that many houses in Japan have wooden struc- Cluster 1: ground-motion parameters and prediction
tures, which are more flexible and has better earth- (e.g. [93–95]).
quake resistance compared to other common building Cluster 2: earthquake disaster response and evalua-
types. However, they are more vulnerable to fire. It may tion (e.g. [96–101]).
be less well known that in Japan, most public buildings Cluster 3: earthquake-related geotectonic research
and apartment buildings have steel structures instead (e.g. [98, 102, 103]).
of reinforced concrete structures [90]. Steel structures Cluster 4: the site amplification effect of seismic
for building have higher earthquake resistance but are ground motion (e.g. [104–107]).
more expansive. Number of publications and top 10 journals publish-
Although there are ongoing studies about novel ing the papers
structures that are resilient against earthquakes, prac-
tically adopted resilient structures include earthquake- The yearly number of publications on earthquakes in
resistant structures, vibration-damping structures, and urban areas from 2012 to 2021 is plotted in Fig. 7. From
seismic isolation structures, as illustrated in Fig. 6. In 2014 to 2021, papers related to earthquakes increased
earthquake-resistant structures, the pillars and beams steadily, indicating with urbanisation, this subject has
that form the main frame of a building are strength- received increasing attention. Table 3 shows the top 10
ened to prevent the building from collapsing during journals in which the earthquake-related research papers
an earthquake. On the other hand, for a seismic isola- were published from 2012 to 2021.
tion structure, vibration isolation devices are installed
under the structure, and for a vibration damping struc- 5 Land subsidence
ture, dampers are installed between the beams and col- 5.1 Causes and social impact
umns to absorb seismic energy and prevent damages to The major reason of land subsidence or land-level
the main structures of a building [91]. lowering is excessive groundwater pumping [108].
It appears to occur naturally, but is a result of human
4.3 Brief bibliometric analysis results activities. Land subsidence can damage infrastruc-
ture, increase flooding potential and damage drain-
(1) Top four identified research cluster age systems of cities, and it endangers human lives
and property. With an increasing urban population
Fig. 10 Geological strata in Shanghai (cross section I-I’in Fig. 9) data from [108] and [112]
Fig. 12 China national project: South-to-North Water Division route map (adapted from http://nsbd.mwr.gov.cn/) [114]
Quaternary clayey soils of 10 to 30 m thickness were cars, and water plants. This could help reduce the
deposited in the Saga Plain, Japan [115]. In Shiroishi Dis- amount of groundwater used in certain areas and miti-
trict, Saga, the Quaternary soil layers were compressed gate possible land subsidence.
due to excessive groundwater pumping for agricultural
purposes and approximately 1.0 m of subsidence from 5.3 Brief bibliometric analysis results
1970 to 2000. After that, there were restrictions on the
amount of groundwater to be pumped, and land subsid- (1) Top three identified research clusters
ence was mitigated. Furthermore, from 2012, surface
water from Kasegawa Dam was diverted to Shiroishi Dis- The search strategy code was theme = (land OR ground
trict and pumping of groundwater was largely stopped, OR soil OR earth surface) AND (subsidence OR settle-
which prevented further land subsidence. ment) AND (urban area). The top three identified top
three research clusters are as follows:
(2) Efficient use of water
Cluster 1: the possible causes of urban ground sub-
With the increasing of world populations and lim- sidence (e.g. [116–118]).
ited freshwater resource, aside from diverting water Cluster 2: land subsidence monitoring techniques
from rivers into cities, recycling locally available water (e.g. [119–121]).
resources is an effective way to ensure water safety in Cluster 3: the land subsidence prediction model (e.g.
urban areas and maintain sustainable development. A [113, 117, 122, 123]).
community can recycle its wastewater, such as from Number of publications and top 10 journals publish-
bathtubs and washing machines, to flush toilets, wash ing the papers
Chai and Wu Smart Construction and Sustainable Cities (2023) 1:4 Page 11 of 16
References 23. Lyu HM, Sun WJ, Shen SL, Arulrajah A (2018) Flood risk assessment in
1. Cohen B (2006) Urbanization in developing countries: Current trends, metro systems of mega-cities using a GIS-based modeling approach.
future projections, and key challenges for sustainability. Technol Soc Sci Total Environ 626(2018):1012–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scito
28:63–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.005 tenv.2018.01.138
2. Degree of urbanization in China from 1980 to 2022. Statista Website. 24. Ren S, Zhang B, Wang W-J, Yuan Y, Guo C (2021) Sedimentation and
https://www.statista.com/statistics/270162/urbanization-in-china/. its response to management strategies of the Three Gorges Reservoir,
Accessed 17 April 2023 Yangtze River China. Catena 199:105096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
3. Kawata Y (1995) The great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake disaster: damage, catena.2020.105096
social response, and recovery. J Nat Dis Sci 17(2):1–12 25. Verol AP, Battemarco BP, Merlo ML, Machado ACM, Haddad AN, Miguez
4. Ornes S (2018) How does climate change influence extreme weather? MG (2019) The urban river restoration index (URRIX)-A supportive tool
Impact attribution research seeks answers. PNAS 115(33):8232–8235. to assess fluvial environment improvement in urban flood control
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1811393115 projects. J Clean Prod 239:118058
5. Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) (2017) Xnxx.com: a belt zone of 26. Yousefi S, Pourghasemi HR, Emami SN et al (2020) Assessing the sus‑
heavy precipitation - Terminology used by Japan Meteorological Agency ceptibility of schools to flood events in Iran. Sci Rep 10:18114. https://
for rain related weather forecast. (in Japanese). https://www.jma.go.jp doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75291-3
6. van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2010) Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer 27. Zheng Q, Shen SL, Zhou A, Lyu HM (2022) Inundation risk assessment
program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84:523–538. https:// based on G-DEMATEL-AHP and its application to Zhengzhou flooding
doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 disaster. Sustain Cities Soc 86:104138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.
7. Binns AD (2022) Sustainable development and flood risk management. 104138
J Flood Risk Manag 15(2):e12807. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12807 28. Carlotto T, Chaffe PLB, dos Santos CI, Lee S (2021) SW2D-GPU: A two-
8. Anni AH, Cohen S, Praskievicz S (2020) Sensitivity of urban flood dimensional shallow water model accelerated by GPGPU. Environ
simulations to stormwater infrastructure and soil infiltration. J Hydrol Model Softw. 145:105205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.
588:125028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125028 105205
9. Ma Y, Cui YT, Tan HG, Wang HY (2022) Case study: Diagnosing China’s 29. Costabile P, Costanzo C, De Lorenzo G, Macchione F (2020) Is local
prevailing urban flooding—Causes, challenges, and solutions. J Flood flood hazard assessment in urban areas significantly influenced by the
Risk Manag 15(3):e12822. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12822 physical complexity of the hydrodynamic inundation model? J Hydrol
10. Ohmoto T (2021) Report for comprehensive survey and research on 580:124231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124231
Kyushu heavy rain disaster occurred in July 2020. Kumamoto University, 30. Fraehr N, Wang QJ, Wu W, Nathan R (2022) Upskilling low-fidelity
Japan (in Japanese) hydrodynamic models of flood inundation through spatial analysis
11. Samuels P (2022) The rise of natural flood management. J Flood Risk and gaussian process learning. Water Resour Res 58:e2022WR032248.
Manag 15(3):e12837. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12837 https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR032248
12. Guo J, Wang J, Li Y, Yi S (2021) Discussions on the transformation 31. Hosseini FS, Choubin B, Mosavi A, Nabipour N, Shamshirband S, Darabi
conditions of Wangcang landslide-induced debris flow. Landslides H, Haghighi AT (2020) Flash-flood hazard assessment using ensembles
18:1833–1843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01650-4 and Bayesian-based machine learning models: application of the simu‑
13. Guo ZF, Leitão JP, Simões NE, Moosavi V (2021) Data-driven flood lated annealing feature selection method. Sci Total Environ 711:135161.
emulation: Speeding up urban flood predictions by deep convolutional https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135161
neural networks. J Flood Risk Manag 14(1):12684. https://doi.org/10. 32. Luo P, Luo M, Li F, Qi X, Huo A, Wang Z, He B, Takara K, Nover D (2022)
1111/jfr3.12684 Urban flood numerical simulation: Research, methods and future
14. Darabi H, Choubin B, Rahmati O, Haghighi AT, Pradhan B, Kløve B (2019) perspectives. Environ Model Software 156:105478. https://doi.org/10.
Urban flood risk mapping using the GARP and QUEST models: A com‑ 1016/j.envsoft.2022.105478
parative study of machine learning techniques. J Hydrol 569:142–154. 33. Munawar HS, Hammad AW, Waller ST (2021) A review on flood manage‑
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.002 ment technologies related to image processing and machine learning.
15. Luo P, Mu D, Xue H, Ngo-Duc T, Dang-Dinh K, Takara K, Nover D, Autom Construction 132:103916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.
Schladow G (2018) Flood inundation assessment for the Hanoi Central 103916
Area, Vietnam under historical and extreme rainfall conditions. Sci Rep 34. Nevo S, Morin E, Gerzi Rosenthal A et al (2022) Flood forecasting with
8:12623. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30024-5 machine learning models in an operational framework. Hydrol Earth
16. Nedkov S, Burkhard B (2012) Flood regulating ecosystem services— Syst Sci 26:4013–4032. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4013-2022
Mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole municipality, Bulgaria. 35. Wu Y, Peng F, Peng Y, Kong X, Liang H, Li Q (2019) Dynamic 3D simula‑
Ecol Ind 21:67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.022 tion of flood risk based on the integration of spatio-temporal GIS and
17. Ogie RI, Holderness T, Dunn S, Turpin E (2018) Assessing the vulner‑ hydrodynamic models. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 8:520. https://doi.org/10.
ability of hydrological infrastructure to flood damage in coastal cities of 3390/ijgi8110520
developing nations. Comput Environ Urban Syst 68:97–109. https://doi. 36. Yang Y, Sun L, Li R, Yin J, Yu D (2020) Linking a storm water manage‑
org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.11.004 ment model to a novel two-dimensional model for urban pluvial flood
18. Pachauri RK, Allen MR, Barros VR et al (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis modeling. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 11:508–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/
report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment s13753-020-00278-7
report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva 37. Avashia V, Garg A (2020) Implications of land use transitions and climate
19. Chan FKS, Chuah CJ, Ziegler A, Dąbrowski M, Varis O (2018) Towards change on local flooding in urban areas: An assessment of 42 Indian
resilient flood risk management for Asian coastal cities: Lessons learned cities. Land Use Policy 95:104571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.
from Hong Kong and Singapore. J Clean Prod 187:576–589. https://doi. 2020.104571
org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.217 38. Balogun AL, Marks D, Sharma R, Shekhar H, Balmes C, Maheng D,
20. Chang LC, Chang FJ, Yang SN, Tsai FH, Chang TH, Herricks EE (2020) Arshad A, Salehi P (2020) Assessing the potentials of digitalization as
Self-organizing maps of typhoon tracks allow for flood forecasts up to a tool for climate change adaptation and sustainable development in
two days in advance. Nat Commun 11:1983. https://doi.org/10.1038/ urban centres. Sustain Cities Soc 53:101888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
s41467-020-15734-7 scs.2019.101888
21. Green D, O’Donnell E, Johnson M, Slater L, Thorne C, Zheng S, Stirling 39. de Macedo LSV, Picavet MEB, de Oliveira JAP, Shih W-Y (2021) Urban
R, Chan FK, Li L, Boothroyd RJ (2021) Green infrastructure: The future of green and blue infrastructure: A critical analysis of research on develop‑
urban flood risk management? Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 8(6):e1560. ing countries. J Clean Product 313:127898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1560 jclepro.2021.127898
22. Han S, Kuhlicke C (2021) Barriers and drivers for mainstreaming nature- 40. Huang X, Wang D, Ziegler AD, Liu X, Zeng H, Xu Z, Zeng Z (2022)
based solutions for flood risks: The case of South Korea. Int J Disaster Influence of urbanization on hourly extreme precipitation over China.
Risk Sci 12:661–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-021-00372-4 Environ Res Lett 17:044010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac59a6
Chai and Wu Smart Construction and Sustainable Cities (2023) 1:4 Page 14 of 16
41. Lv H, Guan X, Meng Y (2020) Comprehensive evaluation of urban flood- 61. Joint Venture of Nippon Koei Co. Ltd. and OYO International Corpora‑
bearing risks based on combined compound fuzzy matter-element tion (2007) The study on risk management for sediment-related disaster
and entropy weight model. Nat Hazards 103:1823–1841. https://doi. on selected national highways in the republic of the Philippines: Final
org/10.1007/s11069-020-04056-y report, Guide III – Guide to road slope protection. A Project of Japan
42. Lyu HM, Shen SL, Yang J, Yin ZY (2019) Inundation analysis of metro International Cooperation Agency, Tokyo, Japan. https://openjicareport.
systems with the storm water management model incorporated jica.go.jp/614/614/614_118_11856424.html
into a geographical information system: a case study in Shang‑ 62. Choi KY, Cheung R (2013) Landslide disaster prevention and mitigation
hai. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 23:4293–4307. https://doi.org/10.5194/ through works in Hong Kong. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 5(5):354–365.
hess-23-4293-2019 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2013.07.007
43. Lyu HM, Shen SL, Zhou AN, Yang J (2019) Perspectives for flood risk 63. Guo C, Zhang Y, Yuan H, Liu D, Yan Y, Hua S, Ren S (2022) Study of an
assessment and management for mega-city metro system. Tunnel ancient landslide reactivation mechanism based on centrifuge model
Underground Space Technol 84(2019):31–44. https://doi.org/10. testing: an example of the Jiangdingya ancient landslide reactivation in
1016/j.tust.2018.10.019 2018, Gansu Province, China. Landslides 20:127–141. https://doi.org/10.
44. Lyu HM, Shen SL, Zhou AN, Zhou WH (2019) Flood risk assessment 1007/s10346-022-01978-5
of metro systems in a subsiding environment using the interval 64. Sun Sw, Liu L, Hu Jb, Ding H (2022) Failure characteristics and mecha‑
FAHP-FCA approach. Sustain Cities Soc 50:101682. https://doi.org/10. nism of a rain-triggered landslide in the northern longwall of Fushun
1016/j.scs.2019.101682 west open pit, China. Landslides 19:2439–2458. https://doi.org/10.
45. Mei C, Liu J, Wang H, Li Z, Yang Z, Shao W, Ding X, Weng B, Yu Y, Yan 1007/s10346-022-01926-3
D (2020) Urban flood inundation and damage assessment based on 65. Sattler K, Elwood D, Hendry M et al (2021) Quantifying the contribution
numerical simulations of design rainstorms with different character‑ of matric suction on changes in stability and displacement rate of a
istics. Sci China Technol Sci 63:2292–2304. https://doi.org/10.1007/ translational landslide in glaciolacustrine clay. Landslides 18:1675–1689.
s11431-019-1523-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01611-3
46. Wang W, Yang S, Stanley HE, Gao J (2019) Local floods induce large- 66. Tan X, Huang Y, Xiong D, Lv K, Chen F (2020) The effect of Elymus
scale abrupt failures of road networks. Nat Commun 10:2114. https:// nutans sowing density on soil reinforcement and slope stabilization
doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10063-w properties of vegetation-concrete structures. Sci Rep 10:20462. https://
47. Schuster RL (1996) Socioeconomic significance of landslides. Land‑ doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77407-1
slides: Investigation and Mitigation, Special Report 247. Transporta‑ 67. Yang Z, Cai H, Shao W, Huang D, Uchimura T, Lei X, Tian H, Qiao J (2019)
tion Research Board, Washington, pp 12–35 Clarifying the hydrological mechanisms and thresholds for rainfall-
48. Junichi K, Naoki I (2020) Outline of measures for sediment disaster by induced landslide: in situ monitoring of big data to unsaturated slope
the Sabo department of MLIT. Japan Landslides 17(11):2503–2513. stability analysis. Bull Eng Geol Env 78:2139–2150. https://doi.org/10.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01554-9 1007/s10064-018-1295-5
49. Hencher S, Malone A (2012) Hong Kong landslides. In: Clague J., 68. Zhu Y, Ishikawa T, Zhang Y, Nguyen BT, Subramanian SS (2022) A FEM-
Stead D. (eds) Landslides: Types, Mechanisms and Modeling. Cam‑ MPM hybrid coupled framework based on local shear strength method
bridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 373–382. https://doi.org/10. for simulating rainfall/runoff-induced landslide runout. Landslides
1017/CBO9780511740367.031 19(8):2021–2032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01849-z
50. Yang TL, Mackey S, Cumine E (2008) Final report of the commission 69. Gong B (2021) Study of PLSR-BP model for stability assessment of loess
of inquiry into the rainstorm disasters 1972. Geo Report No. 229. slope based on particle swarm optimization. Sci Rep 11:17888. https://
Geotechnical Engineering Office, Civil Engineering Department, doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97484-0
Hong Kong 70. Lyu HM, Shen JS, Arulrajah A (2018) Assessment of Geohazards and
51. Yanagawa Y, Nagasawa H, Morishima K et al (2021) Activity of a Medi‑ Preventative Countermeasures Using AHP Incorporated with GIS in
cal Relief Team from Shizuoka Hospital that was Dispatched to the Lanzhou China. Sustainability 10:304. https://doi.org/10.3390/su100
Atami Debris Flow in 2021. Juntendo Med J 67(6):542-546 20304
52. Gerscovich DMS, Vargas EA, de Campos TMP (2006) On the evalu‑ 71. Zheng Q, Lyu HM, Zhou A, Shen SL (2021) Risk assessment of geohaz‑
ation of unsaturated flow in a natural slope in Rio de Janeiro Brazil. ards along Cheng-Kun railway using fuzzy AHP incorporated into GIS.
Eng Geol 88(1–2):23–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.07. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 12:1508–1531. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.
008 2021.1933614
53. Contel E, Pugliese E, Troncone A (2022) A simple method for predict‑ 72. Cao Y, Wei X, Fan W, Nan Y, Xiong W, Zhang S (2021) Landslide suscep‑
ing rainfall-induced shallow landslides. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng tibility assessment using the weight of evidence method: A case study
148(10):04022079. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606. in Xunyang area China. PloS one 16:e0245668. https://doi.org/10.1371/
0002877 journal.pone.0245668
54. Fredlund DG (2006) Unsaturated soil mechanics in engineering 73. Fang K, Tang H, Li C, Su X, An P, Sun S (2022) Centrifuge modelling
practice. J. Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(3):286–321. https://doi.org/ of landslides and landslide hazard mitigation: A review. Geosci Front
10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:3(286) 14(1):101493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2022.101493
55. Van Genuchten MT (1980) A Closed-form Equation for Predicting 74. Huang C, Sun Y, An Y, Shi C, Feng C, Liu Q, Yang X, Wang X (2022)
the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J Three-dimensional simulations of large-scale long run-out
44:892–898. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.036159950044000 landslides with a GPU-accelerated elasto-plastic SPH model. Eng
50002x Anal Boundary Elem 145:132–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engan
56. Fredlund DG, Xing AQ (1994) Equations for the soil-water characteristic abound.2022.09.018
curve. Can Geotech J 31:521–532. https://doi.org/10.1139/t94-061 75. Jia G, Tang Q, Xu X (2020) Evaluating the performances of satellite-
57. Mualem Y (1978) Hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media: based rainfall data for global rainfall-induced landslide warnings.
Generalized macroscopic approach. Water Resour Res 14:325–334. Landslides 17:283–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01277-6
https://doi.org/10.1029/WR014i002p00325 76. Li Y, Cui P, Ye C, Junior JM, Zhang Z, Guo J, Li J (2021) Accurate predic‑
58. Fredlund DG, Xing AQ, Huang XY (1994) Predicting the permeability tion of earthquake-induced landslides based on deep learning consid‑
function for unsaturated soils using the soil-water characteristic curve. ering landslide source area. Remote Sensing 13(17):3436. https://doi.
Can Geotech J 31:533546. https://doi.org/10.1139/t94-062 org/10.3390/rs13173436
59. Chai JC, Gao ZY (2021) Method for predicting drying-wetting and 77. Marin RJ, Velásquez MF (2020) Influence of hydraulic properties on
scanning soil-water characteristic curves. Transport Geotech 31:100666. physically modelling slope stability and the definition of rainfall thresh‑
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100666 olds for shallow landslides. Geomorphology 351:106976. https://doi.
60. Gao ZY, Chai JC (2022) Method for predicting unsaturated permeability org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.106976
using basic soil properties. Transport Geotechnics 34:100754. https:// 78. Medina V, Hürlimann M, Guo Z, Lloret A, Vaunat J (2021) Fast physically-
doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100754 based model for rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment
Chai and Wu Smart Construction and Sustainable Cities (2023) 1:4 Page 15 of 16
at regional scale. Catena 201:105213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena. FAHP. Sci Total Environ 717:135310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.
2021.105213 2019.135310
79. Uchimura T, Towhata I, Wang L, Nishie S, Yamaguchi H, Seko I, Qiao J 101. Lyu HM, Zhou WH, Shen SL, Zhou AN (2020) Inundation risk assess‑
(2015) Precaution and early warning of surface failure of slopes using ment of metro system using AHP and TFN-AHP in Shenzhen. Sustain
tilt sensors. Soils Found 55(5):1086–1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. Cities Soc 56:102103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102103
sandf.2015.09.010 102. Agata R, Barbot SD, Fujita K, Hyodo M, Iinuma T, Nakata R, Ichimura T,
80. Chen H, Zhang X, Abla M, Lü D, Yan R, Ren Q, Ren Z, Yang Y, Zhao W, Hori T (2019) Rapid mantle flow with power-law creep explains defor‑
Lin P (2018) Effects of vegetation and rainfall types on surface runoff mation after the 2011 Tohoku mega-quake. Nat Commun 10:1385.
and soil erosion on steep slopes on the Loess Plateau, China. CATENA https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08984-7
170:141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.06.006 103. Chen CH, Wen S, Yeh TK, Wang CH, Yen HY, Liu JY, Hobara Y, Han P
81. Dahlquist MP, West AJ (2019) Initiation and runout of post-seismic (2013) Observation of surface displacements from GPS analyses
debris flows: insights from the 2015 Gorkha earthquake. Geophys Res before and after the Jiashian earthquake (M=6.4) in Taiwan. J Asian
Lett 46:9658–9668. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083548 Earth Sci 62:662–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.11.016
82. Li R, Zhang W, Yang S, Zhu M, Kan S, Chen J, Ai X, Ai Y (2018) Topo‑ 104. Abbas M, Elbaz K, Shen SL, Chen J (2021) Earthquake effects on
graphic aspect affects the vegetation restoration and artificial soil civil engineering structures and perspective mitigation solu‑
quality of rock-cut slopes restored by external-soil spray seeding. Sci tions: a review. Arab J Geosci 14:1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/
Rep 8:12109. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30651-y s12517-021-07664-5
83. Svennevig K, Hermanns RL, Keiding M et al (2022) A large frozen debris 105. AtanganaNjock PG, Zhou A, Lyu HM (2020) Evaluation of soil liquefac‑
avalanche entraining warming permafrost ground—the June 2021 tion using AI technology incorporating a coupled ENN/t-SNE model.
Assapaat landslide, West Greenland. Landslides 19:2549–2567. https:// Soil Dynamics Earthquake Eng 130:105988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01926-3 soildyn.2019.105988
84. Lawson AC, Reid HF (1908) The California earthquake of April 18, 1906: 106. Zhu C, Pilz M, Cotton F (2020) Evaluation of a novel application
report of the state earthquake investigation commission (No. 87). of earthquake HVSR in site-specific amplification estimation. Soil
Carnegie institution of Washington, Washington, D.C. Dynamics Earthquake Eng 139:106301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soild
85. Snoke JA (1990) Earthquake mechanisms. In: Geophysics. Encyclope‑ yn.2020.106301
dia of Earth Science. Springer, Boston, pp 12–35. https://doi.org/10. 107. Zhu C, Pilz M, Cotton F (2020) Which is a better proxy, site period or
1007/0-387-30752-4_2 depth to bedrock, in modelling linear site response in addition to the
86. Mogi K (1985) Earthquake prediction. Academic press, Tokyo average shear-wave velocity? Bull Earthq Eng 18:797–820. https://doi.
87. Davies D (1975) Earthquake prediction in China. Nature 258:286–287 org/10.1007/s10518-019-00738-6
88. Earthquakes. WHO website (2022) https://www.who.int/health-topics/ 108. Chai JC, Shen SL, Zhu HH, Zhang XL (2004) Land subsidence due to
earthquakes. Accessed 17 Apr 2023 groundwater drawdown in Shanghai. Geotechnique 54(2):143–147.
89. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2002) Basis of Structural https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2004.54.2.143
Design for Buildings and Public Works. Japan Society of Civil Engineers 109. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) (2021)
Website. https://www.jsce-int.org/system/files/Basis_of_Structural_ Global map shows nineteen percent of the global population may
Design(MLIT).pdf. Accessed 17 April 2023 face a high probability of subsidence. https://www.preventionweb.
90. Kanno R (2017) Advances in steel structures and steel materials in net/news/global-map-shows-nineteen-percent-global-population-
Japan. ce/papers 1:394–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.539 may-face-high-probability-subsidence.
91. NHK (2022) Differences between seismic isolation, vibration damping, 110. Herrera-García G, Ezquerro P, Tomás R et al (2021) Mapping the global
and earthquake resistance. https://www.menshin.biz/?q=menshin/ threat of land subsidence. Science 371:34–36. https://doi.org/10.
node/4840#. Accessed 17 April 2023 1126/science.abb8549
92. NSC (2022) What is seismic isolation device? https://www.eng.nippo 111. Liu Y (2001) Countermeasures and their effect for land subsidence
nsteel.com/steelstructures/product/base_isolation/. Accessed 17 April in Shanghai. Proc. of 6th Inter. Symposium on Land subsidence.
2023 Chinese Geology Press, Ravenna, pp 75–79 (in Chinese)
93. Goto H, Kaneko Y, Young J, Avery H, Damiano L (2019) Extreme accel‑ 112. Xu YS, Shen SL, Du YJ (2009) Geological and hydrogeological environ‑
erations during earthquakes caused by elastic flapping effect. Sci Rep ment in Shanghai with geohazards to construction and maintenance
9:1117. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37716-y of infrastructures. Eng Geol 109(3–4):241–254. https://doi.org/10.
94. Minson SE, Baltay AS, Cochran ES, Hanks TC, Page MT, McBride SK, 1016/j.enggeo.2009.08.009
Milner KR, Meier MA (2019) The limits of earthquake early warning 113. Shen SL, Ma L, Xu YS, Yin ZY (2013) Interpretation of increased deforma‑
accuracy and best alerting strategy. Sci Rep 9(1):2478. https://doi.org/ tion rate in aquifer IV due to groundwater pumping in Shanghai. Can
10.1038/s41598-019-39384-y Geotech J 50(11):1129–1142. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2013-0042
95. Picozzi M, Bindi D, Spallarossa D, Di Giacomo D, Zollo A (2018) A 114. Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China. Overview
rapid response magnitude scale for timely assessment of the high of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project. http://nsbd.mwr.gov.cn/
frequency seismic radiation. Sci Rep 8:8562. https://doi.org/10.1038/ zw/gcgk/.
s41598-018-26938-9 115. Chai JC, Hino T, Shen SL (2017) Characteristics of clay deposits in Saga
96. Gonzales H, López-Almansa F (2012) Seismic performance of buildings Plain, Japan. Geotechn Eng Proceed Institution Civil Eng 170(6):548–
with thin RC bearing walls. Eng Struct 34:244–258. https://doi.org/10. 558. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.16.00197
1016/j.engstruct.2011.10.007 116. El Shinawi A, Kuriqi A, Zelenakova M, Vranayova Z, Abd-Elaty I (2022)
97. Jiang N, Cheng J, Ni Z, Ye Y, Hu R, Jiang X (2021) Developing a new indi‑ Land subsidence and environmental threats in coastal aquifers under
vidual earthquake resilience questionnaire: A reliability and validity test. sea level rise and over-pumping stress. J Hydrol 608:127607. https://doi.
PloS one 16:e0245662. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245662 org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127607
98. Kitayama S, Constantinou MC (2018) Seismic performance of buildings 117. Shen SL, Xu YS (2011) Numerical evaluation of land subsidence induced
with viscous damping systems designed by the procedures of ASCE/ by groundwater pumping in Shanghai. Can Geotech J 48:1378–1392.
SEI 7–16. J Struct Eng 144:04018050. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST. https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-049
1943-541X.0002048 118. Xu YS, Ma L, Du YJ, Shen SL (2012) Analysis of urbanisation-induced land
99. Lyu HM, Shen SL, Yang J, Zhou AN (2020) Risk assessment of subsidence in Shanghai. Nat Hazards 63:1255–1267. https://doi.org/10.
earthquake-triggered geohazards surrounding Wenchuan China. Nat 1007/s11069-012-0220-7
Hazards Rev 21:05020007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527- 119. Du Z, Ge L, Ng AHM, Zhu Q, Zhang Q, Kuang J, Dong Y (2019) Long-
6996.0000375 term subsidence in Mexico City from 2004 to 2018 revealed by five
100. Lyu HM, Shen SL, Zhou AN, Yang J (2020) Risk assessment of mega-city synthetic aperture radar sensors. Land Degrad Dev 30:1785–1801.
infrastructures related to land subsidence using improved trapezoidal https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3347
Chai and Wu Smart Construction and Sustainable Cities (2023) 1:4 Page 16 of 16
120. Li Z, Cao Y, Wei J, Duan M, Wu L, Hou J, Zhu J (2019) Time-series InSAR 140. Yan T, Shen SL, Zhou A, Chen XS (2022) Prediction of geological char‑
ground deformation monitoring: Atmospheric delay modeling and acteristics from shield operational parameters using integrating grid
estimating. Earth Sci Rev 192:258–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earsc search and K-fold cross validation into stacking classification algorithm.
irev.2019.03.008 J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 14:1292–1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
121. Zhu L, Gong H, Li X, Wang R, Chen B, Dai Z, Teatini P (2015) Land subsid‑ jrmge.2022.03.002
ence due to groundwater withdrawal in the northern Beijing plain, 141. Yan T, Shen SL, Zhou A (2022) Identification of geological characteristics
China. Eng Geol 193:243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015. from construction parameters during shield tunnelling. Acta Geotech
04.020 18(1):535–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01590-w
122. Shi L, Gong H, Chen B, Zhou C (2020) Land subsidence prediction 142. Zhang N, Shen SL, Zhou A, Jin YF (2021) Application of LSTM approach
induced by multiple factors using machine learning method. Remote for modelling stress-strain behavior of soil. Appl Soft Comput
Sensing 12:4044. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12244044 100:106959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106959
123. Xu YS, Yuan Y, Shen SL, Yin ZY, Wu HN, MaL, (2015) Investigation into 143. Lin SS, Shen SL, Zhou A (2022) Real-time analysis and prediction of
subsidence hazards due to groundwater pumping from Aquifer II in torque of shield cutter head using optimized gated recurrent unit
Changzhou, China. Nat Hazards 78:281–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/ neural network. J Rock Mechan Geotech Eng 14(4):1232–1240. https://
s11069-015-1714-x doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.06.006
124. Lin SS, Shen SL, Zhou A, Zhang N (2021) Ensemble model for risk status 144. Shen SL, AtanganaNjock PG, Zhou A, Lyu HM (2021) Dynamic predic‑
evaluation of excavation system. Autom Construction 132:103943. tion of jet grouted column diameter in soft soil using Bi-LSTM deep
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103943 learning. Acta Geotech 16(1):303–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/
125. Lin SS, Zhang N, Zhou A, Shen SL (2022) Risk evaluation of excava‑ s11440-020-01005-8
tion based on fuzzy decision-making model. Autom Construction 145. Shen SL, Elbaz K, Shaban WM, Zhou A (2022) Real-time prediction of
136:104143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104143 shield moving trajectory during tunnelling. Acta Geotech 17(4):1533–
126. Lyu HM, Shen SL, Zhou AN, Yin ZY (2022) Assessment of safety status 1549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01461-4
of shield tunnelling using operational parameters with enhanced SPA. 146. Shen SL, Zhang N, Zhou A, Yin ZY (2022b) Enhancement of neural net‑
Tunnel Underground Space Technol 123(2022):104428. https://doi.org/ works with an alternative activation function tanhLU. Expert Systems
10.1016/j.tust.2022.104428 with Applications 199:117181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.
127. Kanayim T, Moldobekov B (2022) Monitoring and prediction of natural 117181
disasters in Kyrgyzstan. United Nations, Office for Outer Space Affairs 147. AtanganaNjock PG, Zhang N, Zhou A (2022) Evaluation of lateral
UN-SPIDER Knowledge Portal. https://un-spider.org/book/5138/monit displacement induced by jet grouting using improved random forest.
oring-and-prediction-natural-disasters-kyrgyzstan. Accessed 29 Nov Geotech Geol Eng 40:11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02270-y
2022 148. Zhang N, Shen SL, Zhou A (2023) A new index for cutter life evaluation
128. Huang JY, Zhou QM, Wang FL (2015) Mapping the landslide susceptibil‑ and ensemble model for prediction of cutter wear. Tunnel Under‑
ity in Lantau Island, Hong Kong, by frequency ratio and logistic regres‑ ground Space Technol 131:104830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.
sion model. Ann GIS 21(3):191–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683. 104830
2014.992373
129. Erdik M (2017) Earthquake risk assessment. Bull Earthq Eng 15:5055–
5092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0235-2 Publisher’s Note
130. Shen SL, Lin SS, Zhou A (2023) A cloud model-based approach for risk Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in pub‑
analysis of excavation system. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 231:108984. https:// lished maps and institutional affiliations.
doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108984
131. AtanganaNjock PG, Zhou A, Lin SS (2022) A VIKOR-based approach to
evaluate river contamination risks caused by wastewater treatment
plant discharges. Water Res 226:119288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
watres.2022.119288
132. Lin SS, Shen SL, Zhou A (2022) Energy sources evaluation based on
multi-criteria decision support approach in China. Sustain Horizons
2:100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.horiz.2022.100017
133. Lyu HM, Xu YS, Cheng WC, Arulrajah A (2018) Flooding hazards across
southern China and prospective sustainability measures. Sustainability
10:1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051682
134. AtanganaNjock PG, Zhou A, Shen SL (2023) Characterization of
likelihood of gas hydrates occurrence in South China Sea based on
Bonferroni mean-based TOPSIS and fuzzy set theory. Geosci Front
14(2):101513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2022.101513
135. Sun R, Gao G, Gong Z et al (2020) A review of risk analysis methods for
natural disasters. Nat Hazards 100:571–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s11069-019-03826-7
136. Arribas A, Fairgrieve R, Dhu T et al (2022) Climate risk assessment needs
urgent improvement. Nat Commun 13:4326. https://doi.org/10.1038/
s41467-022-31979-w
137. Kuglitsch MM, Pelivan I, Ceola S et al (2022) Facilitating adoption of
AI in natural disaster management through collaboration. Nat Comm
13:1579. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29285-6
138. Elbaz K, Yan T, Zhou A, Shen SL (2022) Deep learning analysis for energy
consumption of shield tunneling machine drive system. Tunnel Under‑
ground Space Technol. 123:104405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.
104405
139. Yan T, Shen SL, Zhou A, Lyu HM (2021) Construction efficiency during
shield tunnelling through soft deposit in Tianjin China. Tunnel Under‑
ground Space Technol 112:103917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.
103917