At An Inn - Thomas Hardy
At An Inn - Thomas Hardy
https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
https://bit.ly/pmt-edu https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
AT AN INN
Thomas Hardy
Brief Summary
Synopsis
Stanza 1: The two “strangers” walk into a pub together and the speaker seems to think
that the people in the pub assume that they are a couple. The speaker’s preoccupation
with how the couple are perceived suggests his own engrossment in what they could
be, rather than what they are. Clearly, they are not together in the way he hopes,
otherwise he would not comment and fixate on it.
Stanza 2: The pub dwellers aren’t questioning in the way that the speaker is, as we move
into “maybe/ The spheres about made them our ministers”. The speaker wonders if
supernatural forces want the couple to be together. The onlookers seek what the
speaker and his companion seem to have.
Stanza 3: The speaker reveals that unfortunately their situation is tragic; there was no
love or chemistry between them. There is no alliteration which marks a painful and chilling
change in tone. As readers, we are disappointed; the relationship seemed to have so
much hope but by the third stanza, we see that there is no hope. It is hard to tell whether
the speaker is mourning this fact or upset it was ever mentioned. There are no emotions
https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
https://bit.ly/pmt-edu https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
between the two at this point in the poem; their relationship is as futile as a fly hitting
the glass of a window pane.
Stanza 4: The speaker and his companion prepare to leave and do not kiss each other.
The implication is that if things had been as the people in the inn thought, they would have
kissed. There’s a shift to a third person narrative. This feels more powerful, almost like
the speaker is questioning God, a God he doesn’t believe in (if we take the speaker to be
Hardy himself). People at the inn expect them to kiss. The speaker is frustrated that it is a
“bloom not ours”, why would others or God suggest their love could work if it is certain it
cannot? He asks why God treats him like a play-thing, referencing King Lear who makes
the mistake of judgement. “In after hours” suggests that maybe they shouldn't be
together for other reasons we are not aware of but also suggests the drawn-out nature of
their love; it has blossomed late.
Stanza 5: Time has intensified the speaker’s love and the speaker returns to that day
again. Now they are not together but perhaps they wish to have been together, they
look back on that moment as a turning point. It becomes apparent that now things have
changed; they used to look like they were in love but were not and now it looks like they
aren't but are. Certain things keep them apart and so they cannot engage in the physical
side of their emotions. The last lines are desperate, he seeks a way to return to the inn
where it would’ve been possible for them to love one another as they wish to now.
Perhaps Hardy uses this poem to ignite questions of how Victorian society makes
superficial judgements. The speaker seems bitter and angry at the possibilities of what
this relationship could have been. It is possible they are caught in a loop of paranoia or is
it something more harrowing than that still? Questions are left unanswered and
unresolved for the reader by the end of the poem. Hardy’s style is pessimistic and
brutal, a speaker who resents what is rather than what could have been.
Context
https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
https://bit.ly/pmt-edu https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
- The new market economy favoured industrial development and discouraged
agriculture which resulted in large numbers of farmers and peasants losing their
livelihoods and moving to the cities in search for employment.
Literary Context:
Hardy:
https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
https://bit.ly/pmt-edu https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
- The effect of these experiences means his work is often read to be justifiably
angry and pessimistic.
- At the time, Hardy was best known for his poetry (in the 20th century he solely
published poetry) and only later did his novels become recognised as great literary
works. (such as Tess of the d’Urbervilles and Far from the Madding Crowd).
- Most of his work revolves around the tragedies caused by social
circumstances. In 'At an Inn' he addresses the conflicting issue of falling in love
with a woman who (if we read the poem autobiographically) is married. Victorian
society prevents the speaker from acknowledging any serious potential for the
blossoming of such a love and then the tragedy in the final stanza of its impossibility
when such restrictions are removed.
- Hardy wrote and published his poems at a time when ideas put into circulation by
Darwin’s Origin of Species were just beginning to take hold. Many of his readers
would have still believed that the world was created by an all-powerful and loving
God. This context is relevant in 'At an Inn' where the speaker draws on the ideas
that a supernatural force brings the couple together. Hardy was agnostic and it is
significant that his speaker questions the influence of much greater forces as
a means of explaining the intensity of emotion and highlights his desperation to
understand the situation.
Autobiographical elements:
https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
https://bit.ly/pmt-edu https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
At an Inn
Alliteration suggests a comfort in the When we as strangers sought Immediately struck as the two people
location. walk in together.
The people do not know who or what
Their catering care,
they are but they’re interested in what Veiled smiles bespoke their thought Throughout the stanza there are layers
of euphemism; “veiled smiles” suggests
they could be. Of what we were. there’s something hidden beneath the
Verb and following rhyme suggests
there's speculation that the two are
They warmed as they opined smiles. It is as if people have judged that
these two are a couple, so the speaker
married. Us more than friends-- assumes that others in the pub think the
His fixation on the perception of the That we had all resigned two are together.
two as more than friends suggests the For love's dear ends.
reality is the opposite and such a
Their love appears like they are in a
union is perhaps what he wants.
young lover’s dream.
Alliteration emphasises what love And that swift sympathy He wonders whether supernatural
looks like to the others in the Inn. powers are willing the two to be
Idea that love makes your world run
With living love together. Though Hardy was strongly
faster, expression of the excitement in Which quicks the world--maybe agnostic so here he tries desperately to
love. The spheres above, understand how they have been brought
together.
Made them our ministers, Cyclical- they are together but not, this
Ironic that the speaker quotes people
Moved them to say, idea is repeated in each stanza.
in the pub in the last lines of stanza
because they admire the couple and "Ah, God, that bliss like theirs No alliteration marks a change in tone-
wish to be as happy as they look. Would flush our day!" tragic.
They seek what the speaker and his Irony of the situation has really built their
companion seem to have. Dramatic relationship up as something more,
irony because they are not together. simply because other people presumed
so.
And we were left alone
Personification of love.
Reality of relationship revealed, there
As Love's own pair; “Palsied” suggests this has paralysed
their relationship and as the day draws
was no chemistry between them. Yet never the love-light shone they get closer to the death of their
Between us there! relationship.
Seems like they are cold in their But that which chilled the breath
intentions when they are together.
Homophone- pane and pain. Implies Of afternoon,
the relationship is futile; as pointless And palsied unto death
as a fly flying into the window pane. The pane-fly's tune.
The people in the pub expect them to
kiss. We presume, the speaker also had
Shift to 3rd person narrative, gives a The kiss their zeal foretold, hoped that at some point.
sense of power, more powerful and
And now deemed come, Alliteration emphasises the futility of
God-like speaker.
It seems that was not within the Came not: within his hold hope for this love. Embjambed line is
endstopped, mirroring hope abruptly cut
speaker’s power to create love, the Love lingered numb. off; numb - silences any ideas of hope.
ambiguous ‘he’ - perhaps love Why cast he on our port Learned reference to King Lear where
personified? - has power ‘hold’ the King divides his kingdom and makes
Judgemental speaker; judging a God
A bloom not ours? a mistake of judgement “as flies wanton
that seems brutal. The tone makes Why shaped us for his sport void we are to the Gods, they kill us for
their sport.”
the speaker sound very distressed In after-hours? Suggestion that the speaker feels that
and frustrated (why would others or
he is the play thing of God.
https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
https://bit.ly/pmt-edu https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
God suggest our love could work if it
cannot?)
Love is shaped by society’s Exaggerates the importance of time and
conventions. As we seemed we were not the difference between then and now.
Themes
- Love is thwarted by lost opportunities, there is a fascination with what could have
been and the potential of the pair’s relationship.
- This is seen in the speaker’s yearning for the relationship, or perceived relationship
he had in the past with the woman he speaks of. He is bitterly distraught by the
final stanza that what was once a promising friendship/ relationship is now quashed
by “severing sea and land” (line 37)
- The speaker makes clear the multiple forms of loss he feels: firstly, the loss of a
friendship alluded to in the fact “they opined/ us more than friends” (lines 1-2).
The voice, in saying this implies that the two were friends but the people in the pub
thought they were more. Additionally, we can assume that before love would come
friendship and this is what the poem suggests as we read on because the couple
seem to get on so well that everyone around them thinks they are in love when they
are actually just friends at this point in time. Another kind of loss the poet describes
is the couple’s audience’s loss in understanding what they see before them. They
are presumptuous; “ah, God, that bliss like theirs/ would flush our day!” (lines
18-19). Their determination to see love between the couple clouds their vision
and veils them from the cold reality of the situation. The speaker then goes on to
explain the absence of love between the two in this stage of their relationship; “and
https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
https://bit.ly/pmt-edu https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
we were left alone/ as Love’s own pair;/ yet never the love-light shone” (lines
17-19) There is a loss of opportunity made evident by the speaker as he makes the
point that when the couple had the chance to engage in love, they missed each
other for between them was only friendship. This is the root of the speaker’s true
pain and the main sense of loss within the poem; the speaker is most damned by
the loss of opportunity to love the woman he once had the chance to love. “And
now we seem not what/ we aching are” (line 35-36); the use of “aching”
emphasises the speaker and his companions’ yearning for a return to the past when
love was possible.
- In the final stanza, the pair want to love each other unlike before but now the
situation no longer allows for them to be together.
- One of the tragic elements of the poem is the speaker’s supposed conviction that
what the couple had before they fell in love may have been better than the pain he
feels in the final stanza despite the fact that their relationship was not founded in
love; “never the love light shone” (line 19) This demonstrates a yearning for the
past and the speaker’s dangerous use of retrospective. Retrospective makes it
easier for him to glorify the past and forget the challenges such a relationship would
have posed. His poem is a walling in self-pity as he wishes for something that
really could never have been.
- The past is preferable to the present; the speaker looks back nostalgically to when
the couple were physically close, although he admits they were emotionally distant.
This contrasts to his current sense of emotional closeness but physical distance,
indicated by the pair’s separation by “sea and land” (line 37)
Irony:
- Though the guests around them think the pair are lovers, Hardy writes that kisses
“came not” (line 26) and that, oxymoronically, “love lingered numb” (line 27).
It is ironic that the surrounding audience perceive the couple as lovers because the
speaker makes it clear that they were not in love; “no love-light shone” (line 19)
This consequently changes the way we read certain lines such as “and that swift
sympathy/ with living love/ which quicks the world- maybe” (linse 9-11). The
speaker’s tone may be considered wistful here as he retrospectively observes how
the couple used to be perceived as lovers and he wished now, at the point of writing
when they are separated and now in love, that he could experience the dizzying
whirlwind of falling in love with this woman.
- The ironic and tragic element is found at the end of the poem especially, when the
narrator suggests that now the couple desire each other as lovers, the
opportunity is gone.
https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
https://bit.ly/pmt-edu https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
Proximity and distance:
- The pair are close, drinking together 'At an Inn' at the start but emotionally and
sexually distant. This is contrasted at the end when they are emotionally close but
physically distant and unable to act on their feelings.
- Hardy’s speaker rails against the sea and the land and the laws of men which
forces lovers to be divided.
- A reader might ask, has love (as yearning) blossomed in spite of distance, or
because of distance? When they were together, their relationship was “chilled”
(line 21) and there seemed no possibility of love; now that the pair are separated,
they are close and “aching” (line 36) for each other. Is this because distance has
allowed them to idealise the other, to create an image of the other that does not
match reality?
- The speaker bemoans the social laws which prevent the lovers from being together,
the tragedy here is seen as politically challenging.
- “'At an Inn'” follows gender expectations, the only voice we hear is masculine. The
companion, whom we presume is a woman, is both nameless and voiceless and
seems to uphold the societal ideals of a lady; she does not push or make any
hints at a desire for more than friendship with the speaker.
Structure
Form:
https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
https://bit.ly/pmt-edu https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
Metre:
Rhyme Scheme:
- Structured rhyme scheme throughout; each octet is divided in half so the pattern is
abab cdcd throughout.
- This rhyme scheme gives the poem a conversational tone, an ease between the
couple is established. It is as if he is recounting a story known well by the both of
them in a light-hearted and reminiscent way.
- However, the manipulation of the accented beats on particular words reveal
tension beneath this casual tone.
- There is an ambiguity in the word “strangers” - does the speaker mean strangers
to each other or to the people at the inn?
- The contrast between the two strangers and the idle gossipers at the inn is made
evident in the way the stanza’s focus switches between the two groups “we as
strangers” / “their...care” / “veiled smiles/ what we were” / “they opined/ Us
more than friends”.
- The half rhyme of “care” and “were” emphasises the distance from the time he
describes in the past and what they supposedly have now. What they “were”',
implying they are something different in the present. It also highlights the
presumptions of the people watching, who all made assumptions from visual
signifiers. Hardy comments on the way society has a desire to understand or be
involved in everyone’s life. There is a strong desire for gossip and for knowing
which he subtly criticises.
https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
https://bit.ly/pmt-edu https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
Language
Alliteration:
Personification:
https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
https://bit.ly/pmt-edu https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
“Love lingered” (line 28)
- Love is given a persona, as if it has autonomy and is a physical presence rather
than an intangible emotion shared between people.
- Possibly, the appearance of love between the pair is so great that it is almost
palpable.
- The couple and the others watching them felt something so strong that it is as if
love were a person who just left the room and their aura is still felt.
Cosmic imagery:
https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
https://bit.ly/pmt-edu https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
Cyclical structure:
- Hardy starts and ends with the same memories, this gives a sense of
helplessness. The speaker returns over and over to what could have been.
- The cosmic imagery adds the cyclical feeling and could possibly hint at the inability
of the speaker to comprehend what has happened; it is beyond him.
Metaphor:
Critical Views
Albert J Guerard: “The Illusion of Simplicity: the shorter poems of Thomas Hardy”
“What irritated the late Victorians is pleasing to us, who prefer...the pure
unsentimental notes of sadness, loneliness and deprivation sounded decade after
decade; the sense of a life as a succession of small undramatic defeats; the honest
declaration of unfaith and unhope”
- Guerard considers the simplification of extremely complex feelings of loss that the
speaker feels; the pain is “pure” in a way that is unfamiliar to the ways other
poems in the anthology explore the theme of love and loss. For example,
Keats in “La Belle Dame Sans Merci” uses the imagery of the medieval knight and a
bewitching fairy figure to evoke the sense of love loss and sickness, whereas Hardy
maintains a truthfulness which leaves a quiet “loneliness and deprivation”.
- The mention of “small undramatic defeats” is striking as Hardy uses circumstances
that feel real and true to translate the speaker’s pain into words. The image of the
couple being together 'At an Inn' and now separated by sea and land is not complex
or far-fetched, it’s tangible and realistic, which makes the scenario more heart
breaking.
- Guerard also draws on the concept of “honest declaration”, which we may interpret
as the speaker being the poet himself. If we take this to be the case, the poem
https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
https://bit.ly/pmt-edu https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
takes on a new level of sincerity as Hardy’s personal circumstances are the result
of the melancholy tone. Hardy was an extremely private man and didn’t write
himself into much of his prose work, in fact, he avoided any form of personal
iteration within his novels, but seemed to have been more autobiographical in his
poetry. His first wife is known to have said, “There is more autobiography in a
hundred lines of Mr Hardy’s poems than in all of his novels”.
- Guerard points out Hardy’s fatigue; the tone of ‘At an Inn’ demonstrates this
lethargy through the speaker’s quietly disappointed angst that he will never be
able to live the life he now desires with the woman he speaks of. The pace is slow
as the speaker comes to terms with the situation. He is disappointed and seems
frustrated but his frustration is not expressed in overly angry tones.
- In ‘At an Inn’, the mismatched paths of the couple are evident in the fact that when
they had the chance to be together, they were not in love but when they are
eventually emotionally in love, they are physically separated. The irony is expressed
by Guerard as “mismatched hopes” which is especially present and persistent in the
speaker’s wishing for alternative circumstances despite their impossibilities.
Comparisons
Women in Hardy are predominantly weak and men much stronger. In “The Ruined Maid”,
we are presented with a strong rural woman who appears to work just as hard as the
men in the country. However, she is susceptible to the ideals of femininity, fashion and
societal acceptance and the woman she admires is the epitome of this. Amelia’s rejection
https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
https://bit.ly/pmt-edu https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
of the rural life exposes her as a fraud in upper-class society and the perception of a
woman’s fickleness and preoccupation with matters of appearance and social status.
Similarly, in “'At an Inn'” the speaker’s companion is yoked to the expectations of
society and acts accordingly. Like the unnamed rural woman, the companion has no
name and additionally, no voice. The poem is overpowered by masculine thought and
desire.
https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
https://bit.ly/pmt-edu https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
has developed into love and this is what he years for. He wishes endlessly that there was
now no barrier for them to be together but they are unfortunately separated by “sea and
land” (line 37). This kind of loss causes the speaker a similar kind of yearning as the
knight in “La Belle Dame Sans Merci''. This is seen in the nostalgic and retrospective
nature of both poems; both speakers take the form as an opportunity to reflect on a time
when their lover was with them. In contrast, however, the knight tells the story of how he
was smitten with the elfish woman and this distinguishes his loss from that of the speaker
in Hardy’s poem as it seems more profoundly visceral. The speaker in ‘At an Inn’ wishes
for more than he can remember in the past because he never had a romantic relationship
with the woman he now loves, whereas the Knight feels the pain of a loss of something
that he once had, even if it was in a dream.
Another noticeably different way the poems deal with loss is that the Knight is
completely alone as he tells his story; “And this is why I sojourn here,/ Alone and
palely loitering” (line 45-46). This loneliness is also made apparent by the sparse setting
in which he is found and left, compared to the abundant nature descriptions of when he is
with the elfish woman. By contrast, the speaker in ‘At an Inn'’ never seems to extract
himself from the partnership he longs for. He mentions the physical distance between
the pair in the last stanza. However, a deeper emotional connection between the couple is
implied by his assertation that they are “aching” (line 36) for each other. Thus, the
speaker in ‘At an Inn’ is only separated from his lover physically, whereas the Knight
is both physically and emotionally estranged from the woman he was involved with.
3. Love through the ages according to individual lives (young love and maturing love)
The love in ‘At an Inn’ seems more mature - the love of someone with more experience
than the knight in “La Belle Dame Sans Merci”. His tone is more measured and his
https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
https://bit.ly/pmt-edu https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
assessment of the love that he has lost or missed out on is mournful but in some ways
accepting. He states the way it is, his poem is a wishing for something that cannot happen
and he sees that now as at the end of the poem he calls out in exasperation “ere death,
once let us stand/ as we stood then!” (lines 39-40). In this way, he accepts that in this
life, their union is not possible. The knight, however, remains “palely loitering” (line 2)
throughout the whole poem in the same baron landscape which he is found in. He is
lovesick to the point of no return, and unable to move forward with his life. This is partly
why he seems young and inexperienced in love, his description of being in love with the
elfish woman is fast paced, sudden and we can liken it to the description in “'At an Inn'”;
“love/ which quicks the world” (lines 10-11). He is caught up in an overwhelming
feeling that is unmatched by the longing of the speaker in ‘At an Inn’.
The poems both move through modes of proximity, ultimately ending in distanced lovers.
In ‘At an Inn’, the pair are initially physically close; “left alone” (line 17), “Love’s own
pair” (line 18), “between us” (line 20, but by the end they are physically distanced by the
“severing sea and land” (line 37). The initial physical proximity of the couple is
counterbalanced by emotional distance, seen in “never the love light-shone” (line 19)
and “love lingered numb” (line 28). This reverse is true in “La Belle Dame Sans Merci”,
where the knight is firstly found “alone and palely loitering” (line 2). After he “me[ets] a
lady in the meads'' (line 13) his sense of distance from love is diminished and the couple
engage in presumably sexual acts; “she looked at me as she did love,/ and made
sweet moan” (line 19-20), “I set her on my pacing steed” (line 21), “she took me” (line
29, “I shut her wild wild eyes” (line 31). The proximity of the two is intense; they do a lot
of things in rapid succession (almost something new in each stanza) whereas in ‘At an
Inn’, the speaker uses the poem to only talk about one instance of proximity. The effect of
this is that although the Knight and his elfish lady seem to do a lot, the experience seems
short and rushed whereas love is drawn out in ‘At an Inn’. For this reason, the Knight’s
sudden experience of distance; “I awoke and found me here,/ On the cold hill’s side” (line
43-44) is more painful and raw, possibly fresher than the gradual distance established by
the speaker and his lover in Hardy’s poem.
https://bit.ly/pmt-cc
https://bit.ly/pmt-edu https://bit.ly/pmt-cc