Conformational Isomerization of Formic A
Conformational Isomerization of Formic A
Conformational Isomerization of Formic A
levels below them are also strongly delocalized. For instance, the
square of the wave function for the third highest state gives 84 and
16% for the probabilities for the system to be in trans or cis wells,
respectively. This state lies ∼500 cm-1 below the top of the barrier,
that is, energetically slightly below the trans OH-stretching
fundamental and the carbonyl stretching overtone. Dynamically,
this means that at these energies torsional randomization is fast,
comparable with the free rotor states, in accordance with the
observed high quantum yield for the isomerization. The next two
states are already strongly localized in either well with a probability
of ∼99%. These states lie at ∼900 cm-1 below the top of the barrier,
that is, near the CH stretching. The strong localization means
dynamically reduced tunneling probability, and it is in accordance
with the reduced quantum yield for the isomerization.
Figure 2. The calculated torsional potential of formic acid. The vibrational
energy levels and wave functions are from the variational calculations. The The obtained results together with the results of other studies
blue and red curves refer to the trans and cis wave functions, respectively. point out the importance of tunneling in the conformational
dynamics of the OH group.9,10,13,14 Moreover, it is remarkable that
the quantum yield between different pumped modes in the same the excitation energy is so efficiently transferred to the isomerization
energy region. Remarkably, the efficiency decreases only slightly coordinate. The initially excited state can relax via cascading
to about 5% at ∼3500 cm-1 (corresponding to the excitation of vibrational relaxation, and this process is possibly accompanied by
the OH stretching or carbonyl stretching overtone) despite these phonon emission.15 At some stage of the relaxation process, the
Published on March 14, 2003 on http://pubs.acs.org | doi: 10.1021/ja0295016
energies being reliably below the barrier. The quantum yield for molecule is transferred to a high overtone state of the torsion, and
Downloaded by PORTUGAL CONSORTIA MASTER on July 10, 2009
the isomerization then drops strongly about 3 orders of magnitude the isomerization can take place.
at ∼3000 cm-1 (corresponding to the C-H stretching fundamental) In summary, it has been shown that formic acid undergoes
but is still reliably measurable. Therefore, the principal result of photoinduced conformational isomerization when the photon energy
these studies is that IR induced rotamerization takes place at is significantly lower than the energy barrier for this process. The
significantly lower energies than the torsional barrier height. quantum yield for the isomerization slightly below the top of the
The natural explanation for these observations is that the barrier is comparable with the quantum yield above the barrier and
isomerization process occurs by tunneling. Indeed, we have decreases strongly at lower energies. The conformational isomer-
previously observed that cis FA tunnels quite efficiently back to ization occurs most probably via the tunneling mechanism assisted
trans FA even from the vibrational ground state.9,10 To gain more by solid-state energy relaxation.
insight into the mechanism, we have calculated the torsional Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the Academy
potential for the FA at the MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ level. At a given of Finland. E.M.S.M. acknowledges a Ph.D. student grant of the
H-O-C-H dihedral angle, the other coordinates were fully Portuguese foundation for science and technology.
optimized. The obtained potential was fitted with a cosine series.
References
n
1
∑1 Vn(1 - cos nφ)
(1) Räsänen, M.; Kunttu, H.; Murto, J. Laser Chem. 1988, 19, 123-146.
V) (2) Roubin, P.; Varin, S.; Verlaque, P.; Coussan, S.; Berset, J.-M.; Ortéga,
2 J.-M.; Peremans, A.; Zheng, W.-Q. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 7800-
7808.
For this potential, the vibrational Schrödinger equation was (3) Räsänen, M.; Murto, J.; Bondybey, V. E. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 3967-
variationally solved in the sine and cosine basis sets using the 3970.
(4) Goddard, J. D.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Schaefer, H. F., III. J. Chem. Phys. 1992,
Hamiltonian of Lewis et al.11 The inertial constant as a function of 96, 1158-1166.
the torsional angle needed for the calculation was obtained using (5) Su, H.; He, Y.; Kong, F.; Fang, W.; Liu, R. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113,
1891-1897.
the method of Pitzer,12 and the resulting data set was also fitted (6) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M.
with a cosine series to be used in the vibrational analysis. The A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.;
geometries needed for the calculation of the inertial constants were Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A.
D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi,
taken from our ab initio calculations. M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.;
The fitted potential and the obtained energy levels and wave Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.;
Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.;
functions are shown in Figure 2. The quality of the potential can, Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.;
to some extent, be judged by comparing the calculated and experi- Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith,
T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.;
mental torsional frequencies. The calculated torsional frequency Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B. G.; Chen, W.; Wong, M.
for the trans FA is 614 cm-1 and for the cis FA is 513 cm-1, while W.; Andres, J. L.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian
98, revision A.9; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
the experimental values are 635 and 503 cm-1, respectively;9 that (7) Hocking, W. H. Z. Naturforsch. 1976, 31a, 1113-1121.
is, the agreement is reasonably good. The most relevant for the (8) Hallam, H. E.; Scrimshaw, G. F. In Vibrational Spectroscopy of Trapped
Species; Hallam, H. E., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: London, 1973.
present study are the states near the top of the barrier and the extent (9) Pettersson, M.; Lundell, J.; Khriachtchev, L.; Räsänen, M. J. Am. Chem.
of delocalization of these states. Because the calculated potential Soc. 1997, 119, 11715-11716.
(10) Pettersson, M.; Macoas, E. M. S.; Khriachtchev, L.; Lundell, J.; Fausto,
is determined at a lower level than our best estimates for the barrier R.; Räsänen, M. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 9095-9098.
height and ignoring solvation, it yields somewhat different energet- (11) Lewis, J. D.; Malloy, T. B., Jr.; Chao, T. H.; Laane, J. J. Mol. Struct.
1972, 427-449.
ics as well. To make meaningful comparisons with the higher level (12) Pitzer, K. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1946, 14, 239-243.
calculations and with experiments, we discuss the energetics with (13) Nobuyuki, A.; Kudoh, S.; Takayanagi, M.; Nakata, M. Chem. Phys. Lett.
respect to the barrier top. This is a reasonable approach because 2002, 356, 133-139.
(14) Nobuyuki, A.; Kudoh, S.; Takayanagi, M.; Nakata, M. J. Phys. Chem. A
we are mainly interested in the region near the top of the barrier. 2002, 106, 11029-11033.
It is seen in Figure 2 that the two torsional states just below the (15) Bondybey, V. E. AdV. Chem. Phys. 1981, 47, 521-533.
barrier are strongly delocalized over the two wells. The next two JA0295016