Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    Lab Report Excel 2

    Uploaded by

    Mariam Dalloul
    This document contains data from two experiments measuring head loss through different hydraulic components: 1) A sudden contraction, where head loss increased linearly with flow velocity. Regression analysis found a linear relationship between head loss and velocity with an R2 value of 0.899. 2) A gate valve, where head loss also increased linearly with velocity. Regression analysis showed a strong linear correlation between these variables with an R2 of 0.994. 3) Both experiments calculated the loss coefficient Kf and compared to theoretical values, finding errors generally under 10%.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Lab Report Excel 2

    Uploaded by

    Mariam Dalloul
    11 views4 pages
    This document contains data from two experiments measuring head loss through different hydraulic components: 1) A sudden contraction, where head loss increased linearly with flow velocity. Regression analysis found a linear relationship between head loss and velocity with an R2 value of 0.899. 2) A gate valve, where head loss also increased linearly with velocity. Regression analysis showed a strong linear correlation between these variables with an R2 of 0.994. 3) Both experiments calculated the loss coefficient Kf and compared to theoretical values, finding errors generally under 10%.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains data from two experiments measuring head loss through different hydraulic components: 1) A sudden contraction, where head loss increased linearly with flow velocity. Regression analysis found a linear relationship between head loss and velocity with an R2 value of 0.899. 2) A gate valve, where head loss also increased linearly with velocity. Regression analysis showed a strong linear correlation between these variables with an R2 of 0.994. 3) Both experiments calculated the loss coefficient Kf and compared to theoretical values, finding errors generally under 10%.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    11 views4 pages

    Lab Report Excel 2

    Uploaded by

    Mariam Dalloul
    This document contains data from two experiments measuring head loss through different hydraulic components: 1) A sudden contraction, where head loss increased linearly with flow velocity. Regression analysis found a linear relationship between head loss and velocity with an R2 value of 0.899. 2) A gate valve, where head loss also increased linearly with velocity. Regression analysis showed a strong linear correlation between these variables with an R2 of 0.994. 3) Both experiments calculated the loss coefficient Kf and compared to theoretical values, finding errors generally under 10%.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 4

    Q (LPM) Q(m^3/s) h2 h1 ∆h(cm h2o) D(m) A (m^2) V(m/s) ∆P

    5 8.333333E-05 70.6 64.3 6.3 0.009 6.361725E-05 1.309917 616.1759


    6 0.0001 73.5 62.9 10.6 0.009 6.361725E-05 1.571901 1036.74
    7 0.0001166667 76.1 61.3 14.8 0.009 6.361725E-05 1.833884 1447.524
    8 0.0001333333 80.2 58.8 21.4 0.009 6.361725E-05 2.095868 2093.042
    9 0.00015 83.3 56.9 26.4 0.009 6.361725E-05 2.357851 2582.07

    ∆h(m h2o)
    0.063
    0.106
    0.148
    0.214
    0.264

    Head loss VS. Velocity head ( sudden contraction) Loss


    0.03
    0.025 0.15
    f(x) = 0.187881503366155 x − 0.0264498480243162
    0.02 R² = 0.899909815788078
    0.1
    0.015
    Head loss (m)

    0.05
    0.01
    0.005 0

    Kf
    1000
    0
    0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 -0.05
    -0.005
    -0.01 -0.1
    -0.015 -0.15
    Velocity Head (m)
    hv B (d/D) H kf Re Kf (th) error%
    0.087456 0.62069 -0.011475 -0.131214 13191.79 0.37 135.4633
    0.125936 0.62069 -0.001245 -0.009883 15830.15 0.37 102.6711
    0.171413 0.62069 0.002028 0.011832 18468.51 0.37 96.80226
    0.223887 0.62069 0.023343 0.104262 21106.87 0.37 71.82116
    0.283357 0.62069 0.0227 0.080109 23745.23 0.37 78.34884

    Loss Coefficient VS. Reynold's Number (sudden


    contraction)
    0.15

    0.1 f(x) = 2.03456886272206E-05 x − 0.364733537239101


    R² = 0.844122368320492
    0.05

    0
    Kf

    1000 6000 11000 16000 21000 26000


    -0.05

    -0.1

    -0.15
    Re
    Q(LPM) Q(m^3/s) h2(cm h2o) h1(cm h2o) ∆h(cm h2o) ∆h(m h2o) A(m^2) V(m/s)
    5 8.333333E-05 60 58.4 1.6 0.016 0.000165 0.504653
    6 0.0001 61.2 58.7 2.5 0.025 0.000165 0.605584
    7 0.0001166667 62.8 58.9 3.9 0.039 0.000165 0.706514
    8 0.0001333333 64.7 58.7 6 0.06 0.000165 0.807445
    9 0.00015 66.5 58.7 7.8 0.078 0.000165 0.908375

    Head Loss VS. Veolcity Head ( Gate valve)


    0.09
    0.08
    0.07 f(x) = 2.19624922955734 x − 0.0145565349544073
    R² = 0.994448244032802
    0.06
    Head Loss (m)

    0.05
    0.04
    0.03
    0.02
    0.01
    0
    0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04 0.045
    Velocity Head (m)
    ∆P(pa) hv(m) H.L (m) Kf Re Kf(th) error%
    156.4891 0.01298 0.016 1.232631 818809.1 17 92.74923
    244.5143 0.018692 0.025 1.337491 982571 17 92.13241
    381.4422 0.025442 0.039 1.532928 1146333 17 90.98278
    586.8342 0.03323 0.06 1.805612 1310095 17 89.37875
    762.8845 0.042056 0.078 1.854654 1473856 17 89.09027

    Loss Coefficient VS. Reynold's Number (Gate


    Valve)
    2.1
    1.9
    f(x) = 1.04552233146364E-06 x + 0.354146802779477
    1.7 R² = 0.963392727788444
    1.5
    1.3
    Kf

    1.1
    0.9
    0.7
    0.5
    4 0.045 800000 900000 1000000 1100000 1200000 1300000 1400000 1500000 1600000
    Re

    You might also like