Law RTP Compiler
Law RTP Compiler
Law RTP Compiler
Amendment:
In the Companies (Specification of Definitions Details) Rules, 2014, in the rule 2, in sub-rule (1),
after clause (s), the following clause shall be inserted, namely:-
“(t) For the purposes of sub-clause (i) and sub-clause (ii) of clause (85) of section 2 of the Act,
paid up capital and turnover of the small company shall not exceed rupees two crores and
rupees twenty crores respectively.”.
Old Law (Pg 1.20)
The amendment is newly inserted.
[Enforcement Date: 1 st April, 2021]
3. Amendments related to – G.S.R. 123(E) dated 19th February, 2021
The Central Government has amended the Companies (Specification of definitions details)
Rules, 2014, through the Companies (Specification of definitions details) Second Amendment
Rules, 2021.
Amendment:
In the Companies (Specification of definitions details) Rules, 2014, after rule 2, the following
rule shall be inserted, namely:-
“2A. Companies not to be considered as listed companies.- For the purposes of the proviso
to clause (52) of section 2 of the Act, the following classes of companies shall not be cons idered
as listed companies, namely:-
(a) Public companies which have not listed their equity shares on a recognized stock exchange
but have listed their –
(i) non-convertible debt securities issued on private placement basis in terms of SEBI (Issue
and Listing of Debt Securities) Regulations, 2008; or
(ii) non-convertible redeemable preference shares issued on private placement basis in terms
of SEBI (Issue and Listing of Non-Convertible Redeemable Preference Shares)
Regulations, 2013; or
(iii) both categories of (i) and (ii) above.
(b) Private companies which have listed their non-convertible debt securities on private
placement basis on a recognized stock exchange in terms of SEBI (Issue and Listing of Debt
Securities) Regulations, 2008;
(c) Public companies which have not listed their equity shares on a recognized stock exchange
but whose equity shares are listed on a stock exchange in a jurisdiction as specified in sub -
section (3) of section 23 of the Act.”.
Old Law (Pg 1.13)
The amendment is newly inserted.
[Enforcement Date: 1 st April, 2021]
II. Chapter 2: Incorporation of Company and Matters Incidental thereto
1. Amendments related to - S.O. 4646(E) dated 21 st December, 2020
The Central Government has amended Section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013, through the
Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020.
Amendment:
In section 8 of the principal Act, in sub-section (11),—
(a) the words "with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years or" shall be omitted;
(b) for the words "twenty-five lakh rupees, or with both", the words "twenty-five lakh rupees"
shall be substituted.
Old Law (Pg 2.14)
Penalty/ punishment in contravention: If a company makes any default in complying with any of
the requirements laid down in this section, ……. every officer of the company who is in default
shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years or with
fine varying from twenty-five thousand rupees to twenty-five lakh rupees, or with both.
[Enforcement Date: 21 st December, 2020]
2. Amendments related to - Notification G.S.R. 91(E) dated 1 st February, 2021
The Central Government has amended the Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014, by the
Companies (Incorporation) Second Amendment Rules, 2021.
Amendment:
In rule 3,
(a) in sub-rule (1),-
(i) for the words, ―’and resident in India’ the words ―’whether resident in India or otherwise’
shall be substituted;
(ii) in Explanation I, for the words ―’one hundred and eighty two days’ the words ―’one
hundred and twenty days’ shall be substituted;
(b) sub-rule (7) shall be omitted.
Old Law (Pg 2.10) [for Rule 3(1)]
Only a natural person who is an Indian citizen and resident in India-
(a) shall be eligible to incorporate One Person Company (OPC);
(b) shall be a nominee for the sole member of One Person Company (OPC).
Explanation I - For the purposes of this rule, the term "resident in India" means a person
who has stayed in India for a period of not less than 182 days during the immediately
preceding financial year.
Pg 2.11 [for Rule 3(7)]
OPC can not convert voluntarily into any kind of company unless two years have
expired from the date of incorporation, except where the paid up share capital is
increased beyond fifty lakh rupees or its average annual turnover during the relevant
period exceeds two crore rupees.
[Enforcement Date: 1 st April, 2021]
III. Chapter 3: Prospectus and Allotment of Securities
Amendments related to - S.O. 4646(E) dated 21 st December, 2020
The Central Government has amended the following sections of the Companies Act, 20 13,
through the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020, as follows:
Amendment:
(i) In section 26 of the Companies Act, 2013 in sub-section (9),—
(a) the words "with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years or" shall be
omitted;
(b) for the words "three lakh rupees, or with both", the words "three lakh rupees'' shall be
substituted.
Old Law (Pg 3.9)
If a prospectus is issued in contravention of the provisions of section 26, the company ……..
prospectus shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three
years or with fine which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees but which may extend to
three lakh rupees, or with both.
(ii) In section 40 of the Companies Act, 2013 in sub-section (5),—
(a) the words "with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or" shall be omitted;
(b) for the words "three lakh rupees, or with both", the words "three lakh rupees" shall be
substituted.
Old Law (Pg 3.23)
Company:
• with minimum fine of five lakh rupees and maximum of fifty lakh rupees
Defaulting officer:
• with imprisonment upto one year, or
• with minimum fine of fifty thousand rupees and maximum of three lakh rupees, or
• with both.
• company: It shall be punishable with fine varying from 25,000 rupees to 5 lakh rupees
• every officer of the company who is in default: He shall be punishable with minimum
fine of 10,000 rupees and maximum of one lakh rupees.
(iii) In section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013 sub-section (5) shall be omitted.
Old Law (Pg 4.33)
(v) Default in complying with the Order of Tribunal: As per Section 59 (5), if any default
is made in complying with the order of the Tribunal under Section 59, the punishment
shall be as under:
• company: It shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than one lakh
rupees but which may extend to five lakh rupees, and
• every officer of the company who is in default: He shall be punishable with
imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine which shall not
be less than one lakh rupees but which may extend to three lakh rupees, or with
both.
(iv) In section 64 of the Companies Act, 2013 in sub-section (2),—
(a) for the words "one thousand rupees", the words "five hundred rupees" shall be substituted;
(b) for the words "or five lakh rupees whichever is less", the words "subject to a maximum of
five lakh rupees in case of a company and one lakh rupees in case of an officer who is in default"
shall be substituted.
Old Law (Pg 4.43)
(2) Default in Filing of Notice: Section 64 (2) states that where any company fails to comply
with the provisions of sub-section (1), such company and every officer who is in default shall be
liable to a penalty of one thousand rupees for each day during which such default continues,
or five lakh rupees whichever is less.
(v) In section 66 of the Companies Act, 2013 sub-section (11) shall be omitted.
Old Law (Pg 4.47)
(11) Failure to Publish the Order of Confirmation of the Reduction of Share Capital:
Section 66 (11) states that if a company fails to comply with the provisions of sub-section
(4), it shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than five lakh rupees but which
may extend to twenty-five lakh rupees.
of one thousand rupees for each day after the first during which such failure continues, subject
to a maximum of two lakh rupees.";
Old Law (Pg 7.15)
Where any SBO fails to give required disclosure under the SBO Rules then such
individual(s) shall be liable for the following:
(i) Imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or
(ii) With fine which shall not be less than one lakh rupees but which may extend to ten
lakh rupees or
(iii) With both
(iv) Where the failure is continuous, with a further fine which may extend to one
thousand rupees for every day after the first day during which the failure continues.
(b) for sub-section (11), the following sub-section shall be substituted, namely:—
"(11) If a company, required to maintain register under sub-section (2) and file the information
under sub-section (4) or required to take necessary steps under sub-section (4A), fails to do so
or denies inspection as provided therein, the company shall be liable to a penalty of one lakh
rupees and in case of continuing failure, with a further penalty of five hundred rupee s for each
day, after the first during which such failure continues, subject to a maximum of five lakh rupees
and every officer of the company who is in default shall be liable to a penalty of twenty -five
thousand rupees and in case of continuing failure, with a further penalty of two hundred rupees
for each day, after the first during which such failure continues, subject to a maximum of one
lakh rupees.".
Old Law (Pg 7.15)
Where the Reporting Company fails to maintain register of SBO or file return of SBO with
ROC or denies inspection, then
(i) Company shall be liable for a fine which shall not be less than INR 10,00,000 but
which may extend to INR 50,00,000
(ii) Every officer in default shall be liable for a fine which shall not be less than
INR 10,00,000 but which may extend to INR 50,00,000
(iii) Where the failure is continuous, with a further fine which may extend to one
thousand rupees for every day after the first day during which the failure continues.
(iv) In section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013—
(a) in sub-section (5),—
(i) for the words "fifty thousand rupees", the words "ten thousand rupees" shall be substituted;
(ii) for the words "five lakh rupees", the words "two lakh rupees in case of a company and fifty
thousand rupees in case of an officer who is in default" shall be substituted;
Old Law (Pg 7.18)
Section 92(5) of the Act specifies that if any company fails to file its annual return under sub -
section (4), before the expiry of the period specified therein, such company and its every officer
who is in default shall be liable to a penalty of fifty thousand rupees and in case of continuing
failure, with further penalty of one hundred rupees for each day during which such failure
continues, subject to a maximum of five lakh rupees.
(b) in sub-section (6), for the words "punishable with fine which shall not be less than fifty
thousand rupees but which may extend to five lakh rupees", the words "liable to a penalty of two
lakh rupees" shall be substituted.
Old Law (Pg 7.19)
If a company secretary in practice, certifies the annual return otherwise than in acc ordance with
this section and the rules made thereunder, he shall be punishable with fine which shall not
be less than ` 50,000 but which may extend to ` 5,00,000
(v) In section 105 of the Companies Act, 2013 in sub-section (5),—
(a) for the words "who knowingly issues the invitations as aforesaid or wilfully authorises or
permits their issue shall be punishable with fine which may extend to one lakh rupees", the
words "who issues the invitation as aforesaid or authorises or permits their issue, shall be liable
to a penalty of fifty thousand rupees" shall be substituted;
(b) in the proviso, for the word "punishable", the word "liable" shall be substituted.
Old Law (Pg 7.32)
If for the purpose of any meeting of a company, invitations to appoint as proxy a person or one
of a number of persons specified in the invitations are issued at the company's expense to any
member entitled to have a notice of the meeting sent to him and to vote thereat by proxy, every
officer of the company who knowingly issues the invitations as aforesaid or willfully
authorises or permits their issue shall be punishable with fine which may extend to one
lakh rupees.
Provided that an officer shall not be punishable under this sub-section by reason only of the
issue to a member at his request in writing of a form of appointment naming the proxy, or of a
list of persons willing to act as proxies, if the form or list is available on request in writing to
every member entitled to vote at the meeting by proxy.
penalty of five hundred rupees for each day after the first during which such failure continues,
subject to a maximum of ten lakh rupees and every officer of the company who is in default shall
be liable to a penalty of twenty-five thousand rupees and in case of continuing failure, with a
further penalty of one hundred rupees for each day after the first during which such failure
continues, subject to a maximum of two lakh rupees.".
Old Law (Pg 8.17)
(viii) Punishment for Contravention- If a company fails to comply with any of the
requirements relating to unpaid dividend account, it shall be punishable with minimum
fine of rupees five lakhs which may extend to rupees twenty-five lakhs.
Further, every officer of the company who is in default shall be punishable with minimum
fine of rupees one lakh which may extend to rupees five lakhs.
[Enforcement Date: 24 th March, 2021]
VIII. Chapter 9: Accounts of Companies
1. Amendments related to - S.O. 4646(E) dated 21 st December, 2020
The Central Government has amended the following sections of the Companies Act, 2013,
through the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020.
Amendment:
(i) In section 128 of the Companies Act, 2013, in sub-section (6),-
(a) the words "with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or" shall be omitted;
(b) the words "or with both" shall be omitted.
Old Law (Pg 9.7 and diagram on 9.3)
In case the aforementioned persons fail to take reasonable steps to secure compliance, they
shall in respect of each offence, be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may
extend to one year or with fine which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees but which
may extend to five lakh rupees or both.
(ii) In section 134 of the principal Act, for sub-section (8), the following sub-section shall be
substituted, namely:—
"(8) If a company is in default in complying with the provisions of this section, the company shall
be liable to a penalty of three lakh rupees and every officer of the company who is in default
shall be liable to a penalty of fifty thousand rupees.".
Old Law (Pg 9.30)
Change the table
1 For convenience of students, amended section 135 along with relevant Rules, is given as Annexure.
(b) after sub-section (5), the following sub-sections shall be inserted, namely:—
“(6) Any amount remaining unspent under sub-section (5), pursuant to any ongoing project,
fulfilling such conditions as may be prescribed, undertaken by a company in persuance of its
Corporate Social Responsibility Policy, shall be transferred by the company within a period of
thirty days from the end of the financial year to a special account to be opened by the company
in that behalf for that financial year in any scheduled bank to be called the Unspent Corporate
Social Responsibility Account, and such amount shall be spent by the company in pursuance of
its obligation towards the Corporate Social Responsibility Policy within a period of three financial
years from the date of such transfer, failing which, the company shall transfer the same to a
Fund specified in Schedule VII, within a period of thirty days from the date o f completion of the
third financial year.
(7) If a company contravenes the provisions of sub-section (5) or sub-section (6), the company
shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees but which may
extend to twenty-five lakh rupees and every officer of such company who is in default shall be
punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years or with fine which
shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees but which may extend to five lakh r upees, or with
both.
(8) The Central Government may give such general or special directions to a company or class
of companies as it considers necessary to ensure compliance of provisions of this section and
such company or class of companies shall comply with such directions.”.
[Enforcement Date: 22 nd January, 2021]
3. Amendments related to - Notification S.O. 325(E) dated 22 nd January, 2021
The Central Government has introduced section 129A and amended section 135 of the
Companies Act, 2013, through the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020.
Amendment:
(i) After section 129 of the Companies Act, 2013 the following section shall be inserted,
namely:—
"129A. The Central Government may, require such class or classes of unlisted companies, as
may be prescribed,—
(a) to prepare the financial results of the company on such periodical basis and in such form
as may be prescribed;
(b) to obtain approval of the Board of Directors and complete audit or limited review of such
periodical financial results in such manner as may be prescribed; and
(c) file a copy with the Registrar within a period of thirty days of completion of the relevant
period with such fees as may be prescribed.".
Old Law- The section is newly introduced
(ii) In section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013-
(a) in sub-section (5), after the second proviso, the following proviso shall be inserted,
namely:—
"Provided also that if the company spends an amount in excess of the requirements provided
under this sub-section, such company may set off such excess amount against the requirement
to spend under this sub-section for such number of succeeding financial years and in such
manner, as may be prescribed.";
(b) for sub-section (7), the following sub-section shall be substituted, namely:-
"(7) If a company is in default in complying with the provisions of sub-section (5) or sub-section
(6), the company shall be liable to a penalty of twice the amount required to be transferred by
the company to the Fund specified in Schedule VII or the Unspent Corporate Social
Responsibility Account, as the case may be, or one crore rupees, whichever is less, and every
officer of the company who is in default shall be liable to a penalty of one -tenth of the amount
required to be transferred by the company to such Fund specified in Schedule VII, or the
Unspent Corporate Social Responsibility Account, as the case may be, or two lakh rupees,
whichever is less.";
(c) after sub-section (8), the following sub-section shall be inserted, namely:—
"(9) Where the amount to be spent by a company under sub-section (5) does not exceed fifty
lakh rupees, the requirement under sub-section (1) for constitution of the Corporate Social
Responsibility Committee shall not be applicable and the functions of such Commi ttee provided
under this section shall, in such cases, be discharged by the Board of Directors of such
company.".
[Enforcement Date: 22 nd January, 2021]
4. Amendments related to - General Circular No. 01/2021 dated 13th January, 2021
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs have made a clarification on spending of CSR funds for
Awareness and public outreach on COVID-19 Vaccination programme.
This Circular is in continuation to this Ministry's General Circular No. 10/2020 dated 23.03.2020
wherein it was clarified that spending of CSR funds for COVID19 is an eligible CSR activity , it
is further clarified that spending of CSR funds for carrying out awareness campaigns/
programmes or public outreach campaigns on COVID-19 Vaccination programme is an eligible
CSR activity under item no. (i),(ii) and (xii) of Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013 relating
to promotion of health care, including preventive health care and sanitization, promoting
education, and, disaster management respectively.
The companies may undertake the aforesaid activities subject to fulfillment of Companies (CSR
Policy) Rules, 2014 and the circulars related to CSR, issued by this ministry from time to time.
5. Amendments related to - Notification G.S.R. 40(E), dated 22nd January, 2021
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs Vide NOTIFICATION G.S.R. 40(E), dated 22nd January, 2021,
in exercise of the powers conferred by section 135 and sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 469
of the Companies Act, 2013, the Central Government hereby makes the follo wing rules further
to amend the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014, namely: -
1. Short title and commencement. - (1) These rules may be called the Companies (Corporate
Social Responsibility Policy) Amendment Rules, 2021.
(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette unless
explicitly provided elsewhere in this notification.
2. In the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014 (hereinafter
referred to as the said rules), for rule 2, the following rule shall be substituted, namely:-
“2. Definitions. - (1) In these rules, unless the context otherwise requires,-
(a) "Act" means the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013);
(b) “Administrative overheads” means the expenses incurred by the company for ‘general
management and administration’ of Corporate Social Responsibility functions in the company
but shall not include the expenses directly incurred for the designing, implementation,
monitoring, and evaluation of a particular Corporate Social Responsibility project or programme;
(c) "Annexure" means the Annexure appended to these rules;
(d) “Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)” means the activities undertaken by a Company in
pursuance of its statutory obligation laid down in section 135 of the Act in accordance with the
provisions contained in these rules, but shall not include the following, namely: -
(i) activities undertaken in pursuance of normal course of business of the company:
Provided that any company engaged in research and development activity of new vaccine, drugs
and medical devices in their normal course of business may undertake research and
development activity of new vaccine, drugs and medical devices related to COVID -19 for
financial years 2020-21, 2021-22, 2022-23 subject to the conditions that
(a) such research and development activities shall be carried out in collaboration with any of
the institutes or organisations mentioned in item (ix) of Schedule VII to the Act;
(b) details of such activity shall be disclosed separately in the Annual report on CSR included
in the Board’s Report;
(ii) any activity undertaken by the company outside India except for training of Indian sports
personnel representing any State or Union territory at national level or India at international
level;
(iii) contribution of any amount directly or indirectly to any political party under section 182 of
the Act;
(iv) activities benefitting employees of the company as defined in clause (k) of section 2 of the
Code on Wages, 2019 (29 of 2019);
(v) activities supported by the companies on sponsorship basis for deriving marketing benefits
for its products or services;
(vi) activities carried out for fulfilment of any other statutory obligations under any law in force
in India;
(e) "CSR Committee" means the Corporate Social Responsibility Committee of the Board
referred to in section 135 of the Act;
(f) "CSR Policy" means a statement containing the approach and direction given by the board
of a company, taking into account the recommendations of its CSR Committee, and includes
guiding principles for selection, implementation and monitoring of activities as well as
formulation of the annual action plan;
(g) “International Organisation” means an organisation notified by the Central Government as
an international organisation under section 3 of the United Nations (Privileges and Immunities)
Act, 1947 (46 of 1947), to which the provisions of the Schedule to the said Act apply;
(h) "Net profit" means the net profit of a company as per its financial statement prepared in
accordance with the applicable provisions of the Act, but shall not include the following, namely: -
(i) any profit arising from any overseas branch or branches of the company, whether operated
as a separate company or otherwise; and
(ii) any dividend received from other companies in India, which are covered under and
complying with the provisions of section 135 of the Act:
Provided that in case of a foreign company covered under these rules, net profit means t he net
profit of such company as per profit and loss account prepared in terms of clause (a) of sub -
section (1) of section 381, read with section 198 of the Act;
(i) “Ongoing Project” means a multi-year project undertaken by a Company in fulfilment of its
CSR obligation having timelines not exceeding three years excluding the financial year in which
it was commenced, and shall include such project that was initially not approved as a multi -year
project but whose duration has been extended beyond one year by the board based on
reasonable justification;
(j) “Public Authority” means ‘Public Authority’ as defined in clause (h) of section 2 of the Right
to Information Act, 2005 (22 of 2005);
(k) “section” means a section of the Act.
(2) Words and expressions used and not defined in these rules but defined in the Act shall
have the same meanings respectively assigned to them in the Act. ”.
3. In the said rules, in rule 3, in sub-rule (2), in clause (b), for the words, brackets and figure
“sub-section (2) to (5)”, the words, brackets and figure “sub-section (2) to (6)” shall be
substituted.
4. In the said rules, for rule 4, the following rule shall be substituted, namely: -
“4. CSR Implementation. – (1) The Board shall ensure that the CSR activities are undertaken
by the company itself or through -
(a) a company established under section 8 of the Act, or a registered public trust or a
registered society, registered under section 12A and 80 G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (43 of
1961), established by the company, either singly or along with any other company, or
(b) a company established under section 8 of the Act or a registered trust or a registered
society, established by the Central Government or State Government; or
(c) any entity established under an Act of Parliament or a State legislature; or
(d) a company established under section 8 of the Act, or a registered public trust or a
registered society, registered under section 12A and 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and
having an established track record of at least three years in undertaking similar activities.
(2) (a) Every entity, covered under sub-rule (1), who intends to undertake any CSR activity, shall
register itself with the Central Government by filing the form CSR-1 electronically with the
Registrar, with effect from the 01 st day of April 2021:
Provided that the provisions of this sub-rule shall not affect the CSR projects or programmes
approved prior to the 01st day of April 2021.
(b) Form CSR-1 shall be signed and submitted electronically by the entity and shall be verified
digitally by a Chartered Accountant in practice or a Company Secretary in practice or a Cost
Accountant in practice.
(c) On the submission of the Form CSR-1 on the portal, a unique CSR Registration Number
shall be generated by the system automatically.
(3) A company may engage international organisations for designing, monitoring and
evaluation of the CSR projects or programmes as per its CSR policy as well as for capacity
building of their own personnel for CSR.
(4) A company may also collaborate with other companies for undertaking projects or
programmes or CSR activities in such a manner that the CSR committees of respective
companies are in a position to report separately on such projects or programmes in accordance
with these rules.
(5) The Board of a company shall satisfy itself that the funds so disbursed have been utilised
for the purposes and in the manner as approved by it and the Chief Financial Officer or the
person responsible for financial management shall certify to the effect.
(6) In case of ongoing project, the Board of a Company shall monitor the implementation of
the project with reference to the approved timelines and year-wise allocation and shall be
competent to make modifications, if any, for smooth implementation of the project within the
overall permissible time period.”.
5. In the said rules, in rule 5, for sub-rule (2), the following sub-rule shall be substituted,
namely:-
“(2) The CSR Committee shall formulate and recommend to the Board, an annual action plan in
pursuance of its CSR policy, which shall include the following, namely:-
(a) the list of CSR projects or programmes that are approved to be undertaken in areas or
subjects specified in Schedule VII of the Act;
(b) the manner of execution of such projects or programmes as specified in sub-rule (1) of rule
4;
(c) the modalities of utilisation of funds and implementation schedules for the projects or
programmes;
(d) monitoring and reporting mechanism for the projects or programmes; and
(e) details of need and impact assessment, if any, for the projects undertaken by the company:
Provided that Board may alter such plan at any time during the financial year, as per the
recommendation of its CSR Committee, based on the reasonable justification to that effect. ”.
6. In the said rules, rule 6 shall be omitted.
7. In the said rules, for rule 7, the following rule shall be substituted, namely: -
“7.CSR Expenditure. - (1) The board shall ensure that the administrative overheads shall not
exceed five percent of total CSR expenditure of the company for the financial year.
(2) Any surplus arising out of the CSR activities shall not form part of the business profit of a
company and shall be ploughed back into the same project or shall be transferred to the Unspent
CSR Account and spent in pursuance of CSR policy and annual action plan of the company or
transfer such surplus amount to a Fund specified in Schedule VII, within a period of six months
of the expiry of the financial year.
(3) Where a company spends an amount in excess of requirement provided under sub -section
(5) of section 135, such excess amount may be set off against the requirement to spend under
sub-section (5) of section 135 up to immediate succeeding three financial years subject to the
conditions that –
(i) the excess amount available for set off shall not include the surplus arising out of the CSR
activities, if any, in pursuance of sub-rule (2) of this rule.
(ii) the Board of the company shall pass a resolution to that effect.
(4) The CSR amount may be spent by a company for creation or acquisition of a capital asset,
which shall be held by -
(a) a company established under section 8 of the Act, or a Registered Public Trust or
Registered Society, having charitable objects and CSR Registration Number under sub-rule (2)
of rule 4; or
(b) beneficiaries of the said CSR project, in the form of self-help groups, collectives, entities;
or
(c) a public authority:
Provided that any capital asset created by a company prior to the commencement of the
Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Amendment Rules, 2021, shall within a
period of one hundred and eighty days from such commencement comply with the requirement
of this rule, which may be extended by a further period of not more than ninety days with the
approval of the Board based on reasonable justification.”.
8. In the said rules, for rule 8, the following rule shall be substituted, namely: -
“8. CSR Reporting .- (1) The Board's Report of a company covered under these rules pertaining
to any financial year shall include an annual report on CSR containing particulars specified in
Annexure I or Annexure II, as applicable.
(2) In case of a foreign company, the balance sheet filed under clause (b) of sub-section (1)
of section 381 of the Act, shall contain an annual report on CSR containing particulars specified
in Annexure I or Annexure II, as applicable.
(3) (a) Every company having average CSR obligation of ten crore rupees or more in pu rsuance
of subsection (5) of section 135 of the Act, in the three immediately preceding financial years,
shall undertake impact assessment, through an independent agency, of their CSR projects
having outlays of one crore rupees or more, and which have been completed not less than one
year before undertaking the impact study.
(b) The impact assessment reports shall be placed before the Board and shall be annexed to
the annual report on CSR.
(c) A Company undertaking impact assessment may book the expenditure towards Corporate
Social Responsibility for that financial year, which shall not exceed five percent of the total CSR
expenditure for that financial year or fifty lakh rupees, whichever is less. ”.
9. In the said rules, for rule 9, the following rules shall be substituted, namely:-
“9. Display of CSR activities on its website. - The Board of Directors of the Company shall
mandatorily disclose the composition of the CSR Committee, and CSR Policy and Projects
approved by the Board on their website, if any, for public access.
10. Transfer of unspent CSR amount. - Until a fund is specified in Schedule VII for the purposes
of subsection (5) and (6) of section 135 of the Act, the unspent CSR amount, if any, shall be
transferred by the company to any fund included in schedule VII of the Act.”.
10. In the said rules,-
(i) The Annexure shall be numbered as “Annexure –I” and in the heading of Annexure I as so
numbered, after the words “BOARD’S REPORT”, the words and figures “FOR FINANCIAL YEAR
COMMENCED PRIOR TO 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2020” shall be inserted;
6. Amendments related to: General Circular No. 05/2021, dated 22nd April, 2021
A clarification has been issued on spending of CSR funds for setting up makeshift hospitals and
temporary COVID Care facilities.
In continuation to this Ministry's General Circular No. 10/2020 dated 23.03.2020 wherein it was
clarified that spending of CSR funds for COVID-19 is an eligible CSR activity, it is further clarified
that spending of CSR funds for 'setting up makeshift hospitals and temporary COVID Care
facilities ' is an eligible CSR activity under item nos. (i) and (xii) of Schedule VII of the Companies
Act, 2013 relating to promotion of health care, including preventive health care, and, disaster
management respectively.
7. Amendments related to - Notification G.S.R 205 (E) dated 24 th March, 2021
The Central Government has amended Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 through the
Companies (Accounts) Amendment Rules, 2021.
Amendment:
In the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014,-
(1) in rule 3, in sub-rule (1), the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-
“Provided that for the financial year commencing on or after the 1st day of April, 2021, every
company which uses accounting software for maintaining its books of account, shall use only
such accounting software which has a feature of recording audit trail of each and every
transaction, creating an edit log of each change made in books of account along with the date
when such changes were made and ensuring that the audit trail cannot be disabled.”
(2) in rule 8, in sub-rule (5), after clause (x), the following clauses shall be inserted namely: -
“(xi) the details of application made or any proceeding pending under the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (31 of 2016) during the year alongwith their status as at the end of the
financial year.
(xii) the details of difference between amount of the valuation done at the time of one time
settlement and the valuation done while taking loan from the Banks or Financial Institutions
along with the reasons thereof.”
[Enforcement Date: 1 st April, 2021]
Old Law for (1): Pg 9.5
Newly Inserted
Old Law for (2): Pg 9.29
Newly Inserted
8. Amendments related to – G.S.R. 247(E) dated 1st April, 2021
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has further amended the Companies (Audit and Auditors)
Rules, 2014, through the enforcement of the Companies (Accounts) Second Amendment Rules,
2021
Amendment:
In the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014, in proviso to sub-rule (1) of rule 3, for the figures,
letters and words “1st day of April, 2021”, the figures, letters and words “1st day of April, 2022”
shall be substituted.
[Enforcement Date: 1 st April, 2021]
This amendment is in continuation with the above amendment
X. Chapter 10: Audit and Auditors
1. Amendments related to - S.O. 4646(E) dated 21 st December, 2020
The Central Government has amended the following sections of the Companies Act, 2013,
through the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020.
Amendment:
(i) In section 140 of the Companies Act, 2013, in sub-section (3), for the words "five lakh
rupees", the words "two lakh rupees" shall be substituted.
Old Law (Pg 10.19)
(d) Penalty for contravention: If the auditor does not comply with aforesaid provision, he or
it shall be liable to a penalty of `50,000 or an amount equal to the remuneration of the auditor,
whichever is less, and in case of continuing failure, with a further penalty of ` 500 for each day
after the first during which such failure continues, subject to a maximum of ` 5 lacs.
(ii) In section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013, for sub-section (15), the following sub-section
shall be substituted, namely:-
"(15) If any auditor, cost accountant, or company secretary in practice does not comply with the
provisions of sub-section (12), he shall-
(a) in case of a listed company, be liable to a penalty of five lakh rupees; and
(b) in case of any other company, be liable to a penalty of one lakh rupees.".
Old Law (Pg 10.37)
If any auditor, cost auditor or the Secretarial auditor, as mentioned above, do not comply
with the provisions of this section (i.e. section 143(12)), he shall be punishable with fine
which shall not be less than `1 lac but which may extend to `25 lacs.
(iii) In section 147 of the Companies Act, 2013—
(a) in sub-section (1),—
(i) the words "with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or" shall be omitted;
(ii) for the words "one lakh rupees, or with both", the words "one lakh rupees" shall be
substituted;
(b) in sub-section (2), the word and figures, "section 143" shall be omitted.
Old Law for (a): Pg 10.44
(ii) Penalty on officers [Section 147(1)]:
If any of the provisions of sections 139 to 146 (both inclusive) is contravened, every officer
of the company who is in default shall be punishable with
(1) imprisonment for a term which may extend to 1 year or
(2) with fine which shall not be less than `10,000 but which may extend to `1 lac; or
(3) both with imprisonment and fine.
feature has not been tampered with and the audit trail has been preserved by the company as
per the statutory requirements for record retention.”.
Old Law for (1): (Pg 10.33)
(4) whether the company had provided requisite disclosures in its financial statements
as to holdings as well as dealings in Specified Bank Notes during the period from 8
November2016 to 30 December 2016 and if so, whether these are in accordance with the
books of accounts maintained by the company” (this provision is not relevant now,
however, till the time this requirement is not removed from the law, it will continue to be
reported as not applicable for any financial year post 31 March 2017).
Old Law for (2): Pg 10.34
Clauses (e), (f) and (g) are newly inserted.
[Enforcement Date: 1 st April, 2021]
3. Amendments related to – G.S.R. 248(E) dated 1st April, 2021
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has further to amended the Companies (Audit and Auditors)
Rules, 2014, through the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Second Amendment Rules, 2021.
Amendment:
In the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in rule 11, in clause (g), for the words
“Whether the company”, the words, figures and letters “Whether the company, in respect of
financial years commencing on or after the 1st April, 2022,” shall be substituted.
[Enforcement Date: 1st April, 2021]
[This amendment is in continuation with the above amendment]
# Here, SM means Study Material (i.e. Page number of the Study material in reference to
relevant provisions)
QUESTIONS
One of the friends of Ramesh advised him to do some charitable work of providing free
education to the girl children of his native village near by Jaipur. Ra mesh thought about
this proposal and asked his professional friend Sudhanshu to convert this OPC -2 into
Section 8 company.
Based on the above facts, answer the following MCQs:
1.1 Since Rachna, being insane, lost the capacity to contract, Ramesh (who was
nominee) became the member of OPC-2. Now who will make nomination for this OPC:
(a) Ramesh in the capacity of husband of Rachna can nominate any person as
Nominee of OPC-2
(b) Ramesh (who was nominee) of OPC-2 has now become member of this OPC
and now as a member of this OPC he can nominate any person as per his choice
as Nominee for this OPC.
(c) When no person is nominated, the Central Govt. will make nomination of such
OPC-2.
(d) When no person is nominated the Registrar shall order the company to be wound
up.
1.2 Whether conversion of OPC-2 into a company governed by Section 8 is permissible?
(a) Yes, OPC can be converted into Section 8 company
(b) No, OPC cannot be converted into Section 8 company
(c) This OPC-2 can be converted into section 8 company, provided the Central Govt
give license
(d) Providing of free education to girl child do not come under the specified objects
mentioned for eligibility incorporation of section 8 company
1.3 Ramesh is a member in OPC-1 and became a member in another OPC-2 (on 2nd
April, 2020) by virtue of his being a nominee in that OPC-2. Ramesh shall, by what
date, meet the eligibility criteria that an individual can be a member in only one OPC:
(a) 17th May 2020
(b) 25th August 2020
(c) 26th August 2020
(d) 29th September 2020
1.4 After the demise of Sudha (the mother of Ramesh), Rachna was nominated by
Ramesh for OPC-1 as Nominee. But now Rachna has become insane, so what
recourse you will suggest to Ramesh:
(a) Ramesh is required to nominate another person as nominee
(b) Ramesh should wait till Rachna becomes good of her health and able to have
the capacity to contract
(c) Although Rachna has become insane, but if she is able to sign, her nomination
in OPC-1 may continue
(d) Sudhanshu (the Chartered Accountant) who helped in incorporation of OPC -1,
may act as legal consultant on behalf of Rachna
2. Ronak and Bhowmik are brothers and they are engaged in the business of dairy. Ronak
is having 10 cows. The monthly revenue and expenses of the cows is tabulated as under:
S. Particulars (`)
No.
1. Revenue: 3,00,000
(25 litres per cow per day) *(10 cows) * (Sale Price ` 40 per
litre) * (30 days in a month) = 3,00,000.
2. Expenses: (1,30,000)
i. For feeding: (300 per cow per day) *(10 cows) * (30 days
in a month) = 90,000
ii. Medical Expenses (Salary to a Veterinary Doctor per
month: 10,000
iii. Labour’s Salary: (2 person *10,000) = 20,000
iv. Petrol exp for milk delivery van: Lump sum = 10,000
Total Exp= 90,000+10,000+20,000+10,000 =1,30,000
3. Savings per month 1,70,000
4. Yearly savings = 1,70,000*12 months 20,40,000
5. Salary to Bhowmik for looking after Ronak’s Diary business: (1,20,000)
10,000*12 = 1,20,000
6. Less: Contingency Expenditure (20,000)
7. Net Revenue to be collected (after a year) 19,00,000
Ronak’s son Chirag is doing Engineering in Dairy Science from Denmark and is in Final
Year. He learnt a lot by his engineering education and want to invite his father to know the
technical aspects of dairy business. Chirag insisted his parents to come to Denmark and
stay for a year to learn the nitty gritty of the dairy business and also enjoy the life in
travelling nearby places.
Ronak, talked to his brother Bhowmik and explained his plan to visit to Denmark for a year
and requested to take care of his cows. The labourers are engaged for the maintenance
of cows and delivery of the milk, and Bhowmik is just to have a watch over it, collect the
revenues etc. and take care of the cows, till he returns back from Denmark. Rona k also
offered Bhowmik that for taking care of his dairy business, he will pay to him Rs 10000 per
month. Ronak also told Bhowmik that the cows are covered under the Insurance Policy,
for which he has already paid advance premium and also shared the Insurance Policy with
Bhowmik. However, Ronak did not disclosed that one cow is under sickness, it very often
falls sick and needs to be taken care. Bhowmik agreed and the cows were shifted to
Bhowmik’s Dairy Farm House.
Ronak and his wife went to Denmark to stay with their son and to understand the dairy
business there and to visit the near places.
Bhowmik was now looking after the dairy business of Ronak along with his dairy business.
During the year, 2 cows gave the birth to 2 calves. One cow, which often use d to fall ill,
had also influenced the other cows, as a result, one cow of Bhowmik, and one cow of
Ronak which remained in close contact with this sick cow, also fell sick. All the three cows
(2 of Ronak and 1 of Bhowmik) died.
When the insurance claim was lodged, the insurance company refused to pass on the
claim on the following reasons:
• One cow of Ronak which was running sick was not insured.
• Post mortem Report of another two cows (one of Ronak and another of Bhowmik)
revealed that these two cows were in close touch of the sick cow and due to infections,
these two cows also died.
When Ronak returned back to India, he demanded his cows back. Bhowmik returned 8
cows (10-2) but did not returned calves. Bhowmik informed Ronak that due to one sick cow
(of Ronak) his cow also became sick and died and no insurance claim was admitted.
Based on the above facts, answer the following MCQs:
2.1 What was the fault on the part of Ronak (bailor) in this case?
(a) Ronak has not taken the Insurance Policy of the sick cow.
(b) Ronak have not informed the continuous sickness of his cow, to Bhowmik
(c) Ronak has left the cows to his brothers and went to Denmark to enjoy the
travelling and tourism.
(d) Ronak, before going to Denmark, should have sold this sick cow.
2.2 Can Bhowmik claim damages for loss of his cow, which died, since this cow, remained
in the close contact of the sick cow of Ronak:
(a) Ronak is not liable for such loss.
(b) Bhowmik should himself take care of his cow.
(c) Ronak is liable to pay the price of the deceased cow of Bhowmik, since this cow
died on account close contact of sick cow of Ronak.
(d) Bhowmik should be vigilant in taking care of the cows.
2.3 Whether Bhowmik is responsible to give delivery of two calves which took birth during
the year, when Ronak was on his tour to Denmark:
(a) Bhowmik is not bound to give delivery of two calves, since he has already lost
his own cow due to mistake of not disclosing the sickness of Ronak’s cow by
him (Ronak).
(b) Bhowmik is duty bound to hand over the delivery of two calves.
(c) Ronak should not insist for delivery of the calves.
(d) Bhowmik can keep the calves with him as the calves were born when the cows
were in Bhowmik’s custody.
2.4 Bhowmik returns only 8 cows, since 2 cows of Ronak died. Whether Ronak is entitled
to claim damages for 2 cows:
(a) Ronak is not entitled to claim damages.
(b) Ronak is entitled to claim damages only, if he can prove that Bhowmik has not
taken care of the cows as a prudent person, not taken the medical help of the
doctor etc.
(c) Bhowmik should morally paid the loss of cows to his brother Ronak
(d) Bhowmik should not claim his salary, since Ronak has already suffered the loss
of two cows.
3. A Limited made a public issue of Debentures. The articles of the company auth orises the
payment of underwriting commission at 2 per cent of the issue price. The company has
negotiated with the proposed underwriters, Gama Brokers and has finalised the rate at
2.25 per cent. The amount that the company is eligible to pay as underwriting commission
is:
(a) 5%
(b) 2%
(c) 2.5%
(d) 2.25%
4. Krishna Religious Publishers Limited has received application money of ` 20,00,000
(2,00,000 equity shares of ` 10 each) on 10 th October, 2019 from the applicants who
applied for allotment of shares in response to a private placement offer of securities made
by the company to them. Select the latest date by which the company must allot the shares
against the application money so received.
(a) 9th November, 2019
(b) 24h November, 2019
(c) 9th December, 2019
4. Define the term “charge” and also explain what is the punishment for default with respect
to registration of charge as per the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 .
5. Yellow Pvt Ltd. is an unlisted company incorporated in the year 2012. The company have
share capital of rupees fifty crores. The company has decided to issue sweat equity share s
to its directors and employees. The company decided to issue 10% sweat equity shares
(which in total will add up to 30% of its paid up equity shares), with a locking period of five
years, as it is a start-up company. How would you justify these facts in relation to the
provision for issue of sweat equity shares by a start-up company, with reference to the
provision of the Company Act, 2013. Explain?
6. AB Limited issued equity shares of ` 1,00,000 (10000 shares of ` 10 each) on 01.04.2020
which have been fully subscribed whereby XY Limited holds 4000 shares and PQ Limited
holds 2000 shares in AB Limited. AB Limited is also holding 20% equity shares of RS
Limited before the date of issue of equity shares stated above. RS Limited controls the
composition of Board of Directors of XY Limited and PQ Limited from 01.08.2020. Examine
with relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013:
(i) Whether AB Limited is a subsidiary of RS Limited?
(ii) Whether AB Limited can hold shares of RS Limited?
(iii) Whether AB Limited can vote at Annual General Meeting of RS Limited held on
30.09.2020?
7. Nutty Buddy Limited is manufacturing premium quality milk based ice cream in two flavors-
first chocolate and second butter scotch. The company called its Annual General Meeting
(AGM) in order to lay down the financial statements for Shareholders’ approval. However,
due to want of quorum, the meeting was cancelled. Also, the Directors of the company did
not file the Annual Return with the Registrar. The directors were of the idea that the time
for filing of returns within 60 days from the date of AGM would not apply, as AGM was
cancelled. Has the company contravened the provisions of Companies Act, 2013? If the
company has contravened the provisions of the Act, how will it be penalized?
8. 500 equity shares of ABC Limited were acquired by Mr. Amit, but the signature of Mr.
Manoj, the transferor, on the transfer deed was forged. Mr. Amit, after getting the shares
registered by the company in his name, sold 250 equity shares to Mr. Abhi on the strength
of the share certificate issued by ABC Limited. Mr. Amit and Mr. Abhi were not aware of
the forgery. What are the liabilities/rights of Mr. Manoj, Amit and Abhi against the company
with reference to the aforesaid shares?
PART II: OTHER LAWS
The Indian Contract Act, 1872
9. Mr. Yadav, a cargo owner, chartered a vessel to carry a cargo of wheat from a foreign port
to Chennai. The vessel got stranded on a reef in the sea 300 miles from the destination.
The ship’s managing agents signed a salvage agreement for Mr. Yadav. The goods (wheat)
being perishable, the salvors stored it at their own expense. Salvors intimated the whole
incident to the cargo owner. Mr. Yadav refuse to reimburse the Salvor, as it is the Ship-
owner, being the bailee of the cargo, who was liable to reimburse the salvor until the
contract remained unterminated. Referring to the provision of The Indian Contract Act
1872, do you acknowledge or decline the act of Salvor, as an agent of nece ssity, for Mr.
Yadav. Explain?
10. Rahul is the owner of electronics shop. Priyanka reached the shop to purchase an air
conditioner whose compressor should be of copper. As Priyanka wanted to purchase the
air conditioner on credit, Rahul demand a guarantor for such transaction. Mr. Arvind ( a
friend of Priyanka) came forward and gave the guarantee for payment of air conditioner.
Rahul sold the air conditioner of a particular brand, misrepresenting that it is made of
copper while it is made of aluminium. Neither Priyanka nor Mr. Arvind had the knowledge
of fact that it is made of aluminium. On being aware of the facts, Priyanka denied for
payment of price. Rahul filed the suit against Mr. Arvind. Explain with reference to the
Indian Contract Act 1872, whether Mr. Arvind is liable to pay the price of air conditioner?
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
11. ‘Akhil’ made a promissory note for `4,500 payable to ‘Bhuvan’, and delivered the same to
‘Bhuvan’ on the condition that he (‘Bhuvan’) will demand payment only on the death of
‘Chaman’. Before the death of ‘Chaman’, ‘Bhuvan’ indorsed and delivered the promissory
note to ‘Deepak’, who receive the promissory note in good faith. On the date of maturity,
‘Deepak’ presented the promissory note for payment but ‘Akhil’ denied for payment by
stating that he issued this promissory note on the condition that it can be paid only on the
death of ‘Chaman’. Can ‘Deepak’ recover the amount due on the promissory note from
‘Akhil’ under the provisions of the Negotiable Instrument Act 1881?
The General Clauses Act, 1897
12. Mr. Sohan has issued a promissory note of `1000 to Mr. Mohan on 17 th May 2021 payable
3 months after date. After that, a sudden holiday was declared on 20 th August 2021 due to
Moharram. As per the provisions of the General Clauses Act 1897, what should be the
date of presentment of promissory note for payment? Whether it should be 19 th August
2021 or 21st August 2021?
Interpretation of Statutes
13. At the time of interpreting a statutes what will be the effect of 'Usage' or 'customs and
Practices'?
SUGGESTED ANSWERS
3. According to section 138 read along with Rules of the Companies Act, 2013, every private
company having—
(A) turnover of 200 crore rupees or more during the preceding financial year; or
(B) outstanding loans or borrowings from banks or public financial institutions exceeding
100 crore rupees or more at any point of time during the preceding financial year.
shall be required to appoint an internal auditor which may be either an individual or a
partnership firm or a body corporate.
In the given question, the company has a paid up capital of ` 45 crore and turnover of
` 250 crore for the financial year 2019-20.
Since, the company is fulfilling the criteria of turnover (i.e. more than ` 200 crore), hence,
it is required to appoint an internal auditor for the financial year 2020 -21.
4. The term charge has been defined in section 2 (16) of the Companies Act, 2013 as ‘an
interest or lien created on the property or assets of a company or any of its undertakings
or both as security and includes a mortgage’.
Punishment for contravention – According to section 86 of the Companies Act, 2013, if
any company is in default in complying with any of the provisions of this Chapter, the
company shall be liable to a penalty of five lakh rupees and every officer of the company
who is in default shall be liable to a penalty of fifty thousand rupees.
Further, if any person willfully furnishes any false or incorrect information or knowingly
suppresses any material information which is required to be registered under section 77,
he shall be liable for action under section 447 (punishment for fraud).
5. Sweat Equity Shares is governed by Section 54 of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 8
of Companies (Share capital and debentures) Rules, 2014. According to Section 54 the
company can issue sweat equity shares to its director and permanent employees of the
company.
According to rule 8 (4) proviso, states that a start up company, is defined in a notifica tion
number Ministry of Commerce and industry Government of India, may issue sweat equity
share not exceeding 50% of its paid up share capital up to 10 years from the date of its in
incorporation or registration.
According to Rule 8(5), the sweat equity shares issued to directors or employees shall be
locked in/ non transferable for a period of three years from the date of allotment and the
fact that the share certificates are under lock-in too.
Hence, in the above case the company can issue sweat equity shares by passing special
resolution at its general meeting. The company as a startup company is right in issue of
10% sweat equity share as it is overall within the limit of 50% of its paid up share capital.
But the lock in period of the shares is limited to maximum three years period from the date
of allotment.
6. This given problem is based on sub-clause (87) of Clause 2 read with section 19 of the
Companies Act, 2013.
As per sub-clause (87) of Clause 2 of the Companies Act, 2013 "subsidiary company" or
"subsidiary", in relation to any other company (i.e., the holding company), means a
company in which the holding company—
(i) controls the composition of the Board of Directors; or
(ii) exercises or controls more than one-half of the total voting power either at its own or
together with one or more of its subsidiary companies.
For the purposes of this clause, Explanation is given providing that a company shall be
deemed to be a subsidiary company of the holding company even if the control referred to
in point (i) or point (ii) above, is of another subsidiary company of the holding company.
Whereas Section 19 provides that, no company shall, hold any shares in its holding
company and no holding company shall allot or transfer its shares to any of its subsidia ry
companies and any such allotment or transfer of shares of a company to its subsidiary
company shall be void.
Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall apply to a case where the subsidiary
company is a shareholder even before it became a subsidiary company of the holding
company.
Here in the instant case, AB Ltd. issued 10,000 equity shares on 1.4.2020 whereby XY
Ltd. & PQ Ltd. holds 4000 & 2000 shares respectively in AB Ltd., Considering 1 share = 1
vote, XY Ltd. and PQ Ltd. together holds more than one-half (50%) of the total voting
power. Therefore, AB Ltd. will be subsidiary to XY Ltd. & PQ Ltd. from 1.4.2020.
Whereas AB Ltd. is already holding 20% equity shares of RS Ltd. before the date of issue
of equity shares i.e. 1.4.2020.
Further, RS Ltd. controls the composition of Board of Directors of XY Ltd. and PQ Ltd. from
01.08.2020. In the light of sub-clause (87) of Clause 2, RS Ltd. is a holding company of
XY Ltd. and PQ Ltd. (Subsidiary companies).
Following are the answers to the questions:
(i) Yes. In this case AB Ltd. shall be deemed to be a subsidiary company of the holding
company (RS Ltd.) as RS Ltd. controls the composition of subsidiary companies XY
Ltd. & PQ Ltd. as per explanation to sub-clause (87) of Clause 2.
(ii) Yes. In this case AB Limited is a subsidiary of RS Limited as AB Ltd. was holding
20% of equity shares of RS Ltd. even before it became a subsidiary company of the
RS Ltd. (i.e. on 01.08.2020), according to the exception to section 19.
(iii) No. The subsidiary company shall have a right to vote at a meeting of the holding
company only in respect of the shares held by it as a legal representative or as a
trustee but not where the subsidiary company is a shareholder even before it became
a subsidiary company of the holding company. Therefore, AB Ltd. cannot vote at AGM
of RS Ltd. held on 30.9.2020.
7. According to section 92(4) of the Companies Act, 2013, every company shall file with the
Registrar a copy of the annual return, within sixty days from the date on which the annual
general meeting is held or where no annual general meeting is held in any year
within sixty days from the date on which the annual general meeting should have been
held together with the statement specifying the reasons for not holding the annual general
meeting.
Sub-section (5) of Section 92 also states that if any company fails to file its annual return
under sub-section (4), before the expiry of the period specified therein, such company and
its every officer who is in default shall be liable to a penalty of ten thousand rupees and in
case of continuing failure, with further penalty of one hundred rupees for each day during
which such failure continues, subject to a maximum of two lakh rupees in case of a
company and fifty thousand rupees in case of an officer who is in default.
In the instant case, the idea of the directors that since the AGM was cancelled, the
provisions requiring the company to file annual returns within 60 days from the date of
AGM would not apply, is incorrect.
In the above case, the annual general meeting of Nutty Buddy Limited should have been
held within a period of six months, from the date of closing of the financial year but it did
not take place. Thus, the company has contravened the provisions of section 92 of the
Companies Act, 2013 for not filing the annual return and shall attract the penal provisions
along with every officer of the company who is in default as specified in Section 92(5) of
the Act.
8. According to Section 46(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, a share certificate once issued
under the common seal, if any, of the company or signed by two directors or by a director
and the Company Secretary, wherever the company has appointed a Company Secretary,
specifying the shares held by any person, shall be prima facie evidence of the title of the
person to such shares. Therefore, in the normal course the person named in the share
certificate is for all practical purposes the legal owner of the shares therein and the
company cannot deny his title to the shares.
However, a forged transfer is a nullity. It does not give the transferee (Mr. Amit) any title
to the shares. Similarly, any transfer made by Mr. Amit (to Mr. Abhi) will also not give a
good title to the shares as the title of the buyer is only as good as that of the seller.
Therefore, if the company acts on a forged transfer and removes the name of the real
owner (Mr. Manoj) from the Register of Members, then the company is bound to restore
the name of Mr. Manoj as the holder of the shares and to pay him any dividends which he
ought to have received.
In the above case, therefore, Mr. Manoj has the right against the company to get the shares
recorded in his name. However, neither Mr. Amit nor Mr. Abhi have any rights against the
company even if they are bona fide purchasers. But as Mr. Abhi acted on the faith of share
certificate issued by company, he can demand compensation from Mr. Amit.
9. Section 189 of Indian Contract Act 1872 defines agent's authority in an emergency . An
agent has authority, in an emergency, to do all such acts for the purpose of protecting his
principal from loss as would be done by a person of ordinary prudence, in his own case,
under similar circumstances.
In certain circumstances, a person who has been entrusted with another’ s property may
have to incur unauthorized expenses to protect or preserve it. This is called an agency of
necessity. Hence, in the above case the Salvor had implied authority from the cargo owner
to take care of the cargo. They acted as agents of necessity on behalf of the cargo owner.
Cargo owner were duty-bound towards salvor. Salvor is entitled to recover the agreed sum
from Mr. Yadav and not from the ship owner, as a lien on the goods.
10. As per the provisions of section 142 of the Indian Contract Act 1872, where the guarantee
has been obtained by means of misrepresentation made by the creditor concerning a
material part of the transaction, the surety will be discharged. Further according to
provisions of section 134, the surety is discharged by any contract between the creditor
and the principal debtor, by which the principal debtor is released, or by any act or omission
of the creditor, the legal consequence of which is the discharge of the principal debtor.
In the given question, Priyanka wants to purchase air conditioner whose compressor
should be of copper, on credit from Rahul. Mr. Arvind has given the guarantee for payment
of price. Rahul sold the air conditioner of a particular brand on misrepresenting that it is
made of copper while it is made of aluminium of which both Priyanka & Mr. Arvind were
unaware. After being aware of the facts, Priyanka denied for payment of price. Rahul filed
the suit against Mr. Arvind for payment of price.
On the basis of above provisions and facts of the case, as guarantee was obtained by
Rahul by misrepresentation of the facts, Mr. Arvind will not be liable. He will be discharged
from liability.
11. By virtue of provisions of section 9 of the Negotiable Instrument Act 1881, any person who
for consideration became the possessor of a negotiable instrument in good faith and
without having sufficient cause to believe that any defect existed in the title of the person
from whom he derived his title. While Sec.47 provides if a negotiable instrument is
delivered to a person, upon condition, i.e. it will be effective on the happening of a certain
event, such negotiable instrument cannot be further negotiated unless such event
happens. However, if it is transferred to a holder in due course, his rights will not be
affected by such condition.
‘Akhil’ issued a promissory note to ‘Bhuvan’ on the condition that he (‘Bhuvan’) will demand
payment only on the death of ‘Chaman’. Before the death of ‘Chaman’, ‘Bhuvan’ indorsed
and delivered the promissory note to ‘Deepak’, who receive the promissory note in good
faith. On due date, ‘Deepak’ presented the promissory note for payment but ‘Akhil’ denied
for payment.
From the above provisions and facts of the case, it can be said that ‘Deepak’ has received
the promissory note in good faith, he is a holder in due course and his rights will not be
affected by any condition attached to the instrument by any prior party. Therefore, ‘Deepak’
can recover the amount due on the promissory note from ‘Akhil’.
12. Section10 of the General Clauses Act 1897 provides where by any legislation or regulation,
any act or proceeding is directed or allowed to be done or taken in any court or office on a
certain day or within a prescribed period then, if the Court or office is closed on that day or
last day of the prescribed period, the act or proceeding shall be considered as done or
taken in due time if it is done or taken on the next day afterwards on which the Court or
office is open.
A promissory note of `1000 was issued by Mr. Sohan to Mr. Mohan on 17 th May 2021
which was payable 3 months after date. After that, a sudden holiday was declared on 20 th
August 2021 due to Moharram.
In the given case, the period of 3 months ends on 17 th August 2021. Three days of grace
are to be added. It falls due on 20 th August 2021 which declared to be a public holiday after
the issue of Promissory Note. In the light of provisions of Sec. 10 of the General Clauses
Act 1897, the due date will be on next day when office is open i.e. 21 st August 2021.
13. Effect of usage: Usage or practice developed under the statute is indicative of the
meaning recognized to its words by contemporary opinion. A uniform notorious practice
continued under an old statute and inaction of the Legislature to amend the same are
important factors to show that the practice so followed was based on correct understanding
of the law. When the usage or practice receives judicial or legislative approval it gains
additional weight.
In this connection, we have to bear in mind two Latin maxims:
(i) 'Optima Legum interpres est consuetude' (the custom is the best interpreter of the
law); and
(ii) 'Contemporanea exposito est optima et fortissinia in lege' (the best way to interpret a
document is to read it as it would have been read when made).
Therefore, the best interpretation/construction of a statute or any other document is that
which has been made by the contemporary authority. Simply stated, old statutes and
documents should be interpreted as they would have been at the time when they were
enacted/written.
Contemporary official statements throwing light on the construction of a statute and
statutory instruments made under it have been used as contemporanea expositio to
interpret not only ancient but even recent statutes in India.
ANNEXURE
Section 135 read along with Companies (Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014
The Companies Act, 2013 lays down the provisions requiring corporates to mandatorily spend
a prescribed percentage of their profits on certain specified areas of social upliftment in
discharge of their social responsibilities. Broadly, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) implies
a concept, whereby companies decide to contribute to a better society and a cleaner
environment – a concept, whereby the companies integrate social and other useful concerns in
their business operations for the betterment of its stakeholders and society in general.
The provisions related with Corporate Social Responsibility has been enshrined under section
135 and Companies (Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014 1.
DEFINITIONS
1. “Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)” means the activities undertaken by a Company
in pursuance of its statutory obligation laid down in section 135 of the Act in accordance
with the provisions contained in these rules, but shall not include the following, namely:-
(i) activities undertaken in pursuance of normal course of business of the company:
Provided that any company engaged in research and development activity of new
vaccine, drugs and medical devices in their normal course of business may undertake
research and development activity of new vaccine, drugs and medical devices related
to COVID-19 for financial years 2020-21, 2021-22, 2022-23 subject to the conditions
that
(a) such research and development activities shall be carried out in collaboration
with any of the institutes or organisations mentioned in item (ix) of Schedule VII
to the Act;
(b) details of such activity shall be disclosed separately in the Annual report on CSR
included in the Board’s Report;
(ii) any activity undertaken by the company outside India except for training of Indian
sports personnel representing any State or Union territory at national level or India at
international level;
(iii) contribution of any amount directly or indirectly to any political party under section
182 of the Act;
(iv) activities benefitting employees of the company as defined in clause (k) of section 2
of the Code on Wages, 2019;
1These rules have been recently amended by the Companies (CSR Policy) Amendment Rules, 2021 dated
22nd January, 2021.
(v) activities supported by the companies on sponsorship basis for deriving marketing
benefits for its products or services;
(vi) activities carried out for fulfilment of any other statutory obligations under any law in
force in India; [Rule 2(d)]
2. "CSR Committee" means the Corporate Social Responsibility Committee of the Board
referred to in section 135 of the Act; [Rule 2(e)]
3. "CSR Policy" means a statement containing the approach and direction given by the board
of a company, taking into account the recommendations of its CSR Committee, and
includes guiding principles for selection, implementation and monitoring of activities as well
as formulation of the annual action plan; [Rule 2(f)]
4. “Administrative overheads” means the expenses incurred by the company for ‘general
management and administration’ of Corporate Social Responsibility functions in the
company but shall not include the expenses directly incurred for the designing,
implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of a particular Corporate Social Responsibility
project or programme; [Rule 2(b)]
5. “International Organisation” means an organisation notified by the Central Government
as an international organisation under section 3 of the United Nations (Privileges and
Immunities) Act, 1947, to which the provisions of the Schedule to the said Act apply; [Rule
2(g)]
6. "Net profit" means the net profit of a company as per its financial statement prepared in
accordance with the applicable provisions of the Act, but shall not include the following,
namely:-
(i) any profit arising from any overseas branch or branches of the company, whether
operated as a separate company or otherwise; and
(ii) any dividend received from other companies in India, which are covered under and
complying with the provisions of section 135 of the Act:
Provided that in case of a foreign company covered under these rules, net profit means
the net profit of such company as per profit and loss account prepared in terms of clause
(a) of sub-section (1) of section 381, read with section 198 of the Act; [Rule 2(h)]
7. “Ongoing Project” means a multi-year project undertaken by a Company in fulfilment of
its CSR obligation having timelines not exceeding three years excluding the financial year
in which it was commenced, and shall include such project that was initially not approved
as a multi-year project but whose duration has been extended beyond one year by the
board based on reasonable justification; [Rule 2(i)]
8. “Public Authority” means ‘Public Authority’ as defined in clause (h) of section 2 of the
Right to Information Act, 2005; [Rule 2(j)]
2For the purposes of this section (i.e. section 135) "net profit" shall not include such sums as
may be prescribed, and shall be calculated in accordance with the provisions of section 198.
For details about more about refer later pages- heading ‘Calculation of Net Profits’
Answer: As per sec 2(57) of the Companies Act 2013, any reserves created out of revaluation
of assets doesn’t form part of net worth. The company fair valued its property, plant and
equipment and took that to retained earnings.
Even if the company has taken the fair valuation to the retained earnings in its books of
accounts, the resultant credit in reserves (by whatever name called) would be in t he category
of ‘reserves created out of revaluation of assets’ which is specifically excluded in the definition
of ‘net worth’ in section 2 (57) and hence should be excluded by the company.
Further the auditors should also consider the matter related to accounting of this reserve
separately at the time of audit of books of accounts of the company.
Exclusion of Companies [Rule 3(2) of the Companies (CSR) Rules, 2014]
Every company which ceases to be a company covered under subsection (1) of section 135 of
the Act for three consecutive financial years shall not be required to -
(a) constitute a CSR Committee; and
(b) comply with the provisions contained in sub-section (2) to (6) of the said section,
till such time it meets the criteria specified in sub-section (1) of section 135.
COMPOSITION OF CSR COMMITTEE
Corporate Social Responsibility Committee of the Board shall consist of three or more directors,
out of which at least one director shall be an independent director.
Provided that where a company is not required to appoint an independent director under sub -
section (4) of section 149, it shall have in its Corporate Social Responsibility Committee two or
more directors.
According to Rule 5(1) of the Companies (CSR) Rules, 2014:
The companies mentioned in the rule 3 shall constitute CSR Committee as under.-
(i) a company covered under subsection (1) of section 135 which is not required to appoint
an independent director pursuant to sub-section (4) of section 149 of the Act, shall have
its CSR Committee without such director;
(ii) a private company having only two directors on its Board shall constitute its CSR
Committee with two such directors;
(iii) with respect to a foreign company covered under these rules, the CSR Committee shall
comprise of at least two persons of which one person shall be as specified under clause
(d) of sub-section (1) of section 380 of the Act and another person shall be nominated by
the foreign company.
Disclosure of composition of CSR Committee
As per section 135(2), the Board's report under sub-section (3) of section 134 shall disclose the
composition of the Corporate Social Responsibility Committee.
completed the period of three financial years since its incorporation, during such immediately
preceding financial years, in pursuance of its Corporate Social Responsibility Policy:
Provided that the company shall give preference to the local area and areas around it whe re it
operates, for spending the amount earmarked for Corporate Social Responsibility activities:
Provided further that if the company fails to spend such amount, the Board shall, in its report
made under clause (o) of sub-section (3) of section 134, specify the reasons for not spending
the amount and, unless the unspent amount relates to any ongoing project referred to in sub-
section (6), transfer such unspent amount to a Fund specified in Schedule VII, within a period
of six months of the expiry of the financial year.
Provided also that if the company spends an amount in excess of the requirements provided
under this sub-section, such company may set off such excess amount against the requirement
to spend under this sub-section for such number of succeeding financial years and in such
manner, as may be prescribed.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this section "net profit" shall not include such sums as may
be prescribed, and shall be calculated in accordance with the provisions of section 198.
According to section 135(6), any amount remaining unspent under sub -section (5), pursuant to
any ongoing project, fulfilling such conditions as may be prescribed, undertaken by a company
in persuance of its Corporate Social Responsibility Policy, shall be transferred by the company
within a period of thirty days from the end of the financial year to a special account to be opened
by the company in that behalf for that financial year in any scheduled bank to be called the
Unspent Corporate Social Responsibility Account, and such amount shall be spent by the
company in pursuance of its obligation towards the Corporate Social Responsibility Policy within
a period of three financial years from the date of such transfer, failing which, the company shall
transfer the same to a Fund specified in Schedule VII, within a period of thirty days from the
date of completion of the third financial year.
Calculation of Net Profits
1. For the purposes of this section (i.e. section 135) "net profit" shall not include such sums
as may be prescribed, and shall be calculated in accordance with the provisions of section
198. [Explanation in section 135(5)]
2. "Net profit" means the net profit of a company as per its financial statement prepared in
accordance with the applicable provisions of the Act, but shall not include the following,
namely:-
(i) any profit arising from any overseas branch or branches of the company, whether
operated as a separate company or otherwise; and
(ii) any dividend received from other companies in India, which are covered under and
complying with the provisions of section 135 of the Act:
Provided that in case of a foreign company covered under these rules, net profit means
the net profit of such company as per profit and loss account prepared in terms of clause
(a) of sub-section (1) of section 381, read with section 198 of the Act; [Rule 2(h)]
CSR Expenditure [Rule 7 of Companies (CSR) Rules, 2014]
(1) The board shall ensure that the administrative overheads shall not exceed five percent of
total CSR expenditure of the company for the financial year.
(2) Any surplus arising out of the CSR activities shall not form part of the business profit of a
company and shall be ploughed back into the same project or shall be transferred to the
Unspent CSR Account and spent in pursuance of CSR policy and annual action plan of the
company or transfer such surplus amount to a Fund specified in Schedule VII, within a
period of six months of the expiry of the financial year.
(3) Where a company spends an amount in excess of requirement provided under sub -section
(5) of section 135, such excess amount may be set off against the requirement to spend
under sub-section (5) of section 135 up to immediate succeeding three financial years
subject to the conditions that –
(i) the excess amount available for set off shall not include the surplus arising out of the
CSR activities, if any, in pursuance of sub-rule (2) of this rule.
(ii) the Board of the company shall pass a resolution to that effect.
(4) The CSR amount may be spent by a company for creation or acquisition of a capital asset,
which shall be held by -
(a) a company established under section 8 of the Act, or a Registered Public Trust or
Registered Society, having charitable objects and CSR Registration Number under
sub-rule (2) of rule 4; or
(b) beneficiaries of the said CSR project, in the form of self-help groups, collectives,
entities; or
(c) a public authority:
Provided that any capital asset created by a company prior to the commencement of the
Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Amendment Rules, 2021, shall within
a period of one hundred and eighty days from such commencement comply with th e
requirement of this rule, which may be extended by a further period of not more than ninety
days with the approval of the Board based on reasonable justification.
Transfer of unspent CSR amount [Rule 10 of Companies (CSR Policy) Rules, 2014
Until a fund is specified in Schedule VII for the purposes of subsection (5) and (6) of section
135 of the Act, the unspent CSR amount, if any, shall be transferred by the company to any
fund included in schedule VII of the Act.
PENAL PROVISIONS
If a company is in default in complying with the provisions of sub-section (5) or sub-section (6),
the company shall be liable to a penalty of twice the amount required to be transferred by the
company to the Fund specified in Schedule VII or the Unspent Corporate Social Res ponsibility
Account, as the case may be, or one crore rupees, whichever is less, and every officer of the
company who is in default shall be liable to a penalty of one-tenth of the amount required to be
transferred by the company to such Fund specified in Schedule VII, or the Unspent Corporate
Social Responsibility Account, as the case may be, or two lakh rupees, whichever is less.
[Section 135(7)]
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OF THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
The Central Government may give such general or special directions to a company or class of
companies as it considers necessary to ensure compliance of provisions of this section and
such company or class of companies shall comply with such directions. [Section 135(8)]
WHEN IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO CONSTITUTE A CSR COMMITTEE
According to section 135(9), where the amount to be spent by a company under sub -section (5)
does not exceed fifty lakh rupees, the requirement under sub-section (1) for constitution of the
Corporate Social Responsibility Committee shall not be applicable and the functions of such
Committee provided under this section shall, in such cases, be discharged by the Board of
Directors of such company.
CSR IMPLEMENTATION [Rule 4 of the Companies (CSR Policy) Rules, 2014]:
(1) The Board shall ensure that the CSR activities are undertaken by the company itself or
through-
(a) a company established under section 8 of the Act, or a registered public trust or a
registered society, registered under section 12A and 80 G of the Income Tax Act,
1961, established by the company, either singly or along with any other company, or
(b) a company established under section 8 of the Act or a registered trust or a registered
society, established by the Central Government or State Government; or
(c) any entity established under an Act of Parliament or a State legislature; or
(d) a company established under section 8 of the Act, or a registered public trust or a
registered society, registered under section 12A and 80G of the Income Tax Act,
1961, and having an established track record of at least three years in undertaking
similar activities.
(2) (a) Every entity, covered under sub-rule (1), who intends to undertake any CSR activity,
shall register itself with the Central Government by filing the form CSR-1 electronically
with the Registrar, with effect from the 01 st day of April 2021:
Provided that the provisions of this sub-rule shall not affect the CSR projects or
programmes approved prior to the 01st day of April 2021.
(b) Form CSR-1 shall be signed and submitted electronically by the entity and shall be
verified digitally by a Chartered Accountant in practice or a Company Secretary in
practice or a Cost Accountant in practice.
(c) On the submission of the Form CSR-1 on the portal, a unique CSR Registration
Number shall be generated by the system automatically.
(3) A company may engage international organisations for designing, monitoring and
evaluation of the CSR projects or programmes as per its CSR policy as well as for capacity
building of their own personnel for CSR.
(4) A company may also collaborate with other companies for undertaking projects or
programmes or CSR activities in such a manner that the CSR committees of respective
companies are in a position to report separately on such projects or programmes in
accordance with these rules.
(5) The Board of a company shall satisfy itself that the funds so disbursed have been utilised
for the purposes and in the manner as approved by it and the Chief Financial Officer or the
person responsible for financial management shall certify to the effect.
(6) In case of ongoing project, the Board of a Company shall monitor the implementation of
the project with reference to the approved timelines and year-wise allocation and shall be
competent to make modifications, if any, for smooth implementation of the project within
the overall permissible time period.
CSR REPORTING (Rule 8)
(1) The Board's Report of a company covered under these rules pertaining to any financial
year shall include an annual report on CSR containing particulars specified in Annexure I
or Annexure II, as applicable.
(2) In case of a foreign company, the balance sheet filed under clause (b) of sub -section (1)
of section 381 of the Act, shall contain an annual report on CSR containing part iculars
specified in Annexure I or Annexure II, as applicable.
(3) (a) Every company having average CSR obligation of ten crore rupees or more in
pursuance of subsection (5) of section 135 of the Act, in the three immediately
preceding financial years, shall undertake impact assessment, through an
independent agency, of their CSR projects having outlays of one crore rupees or
more, and which have been completed not less than one year before undertaking the
impact study.
(b) The impact assessment reports shall be placed before the Board and shall be
annexed to the annual report on CSR.
(c) A Company undertaking impact assessment may book the expenditure towa rds
Corporate Social Responsibility for that financial year, which shall not exceed five
percent of the total CSR expenditure for that financial year or fifty lakh rupees,
whichever is less.
and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homoeopathy (AYUSH); Ministry of Electronics and
Information Technology and other bodies, namely Defense Research and Development
Organisation (DRDO);Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR); Indian Council of
Medical Research (ICMR) Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), engaged
in conducting research in science, technology, engineering and medicine aimed at
promoting Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs);
(10) rural development projects;
(11) slum area development. [For the purposes of this item, the term ‘slum area’ shall mean
any area declared as such by the Central Government or any State Government or any
other competent authority under any law for the time being in force.
(12) disaster management, including relief, rehabilitation and reconstruction activities.
CLARIFICATIONS
The MCA vide General Circular No. 21/2014 dated 18 June 2014 has provided many
clarifications with regard to provisions of Corporate Social Responsibility under section 135 of
the Companies Act, 2013 which are as under:
(i) The statutory provision and provisions of CSR Rules, 2014, is to ensure that while activities
undertaken in pursuance of the CSR policy must be relatable to Schedule VII of the
Companies Act 2013, the entries in the said Schedule VII must be interpreted liberally so
as to capture the essence of the subjects enumerated in the said Schedule. The items
enlisted in the amended Schedule VII of the Act, are broad-based and are intended to
cover a wide range of activities as illustratively mentioned in the Annexure.
(ii) It is further clarified that CSR activities should be undertaken by the companies in project/
programme mode. One-off events such as marathons/ awards/ charitable contribution/
advertisement/ sponsorships of TV programmes etc. would not be qualified as part of CSR
expenditure.
(iii) Expenses incurred by companies for the fulfillment of any Act/ Statute of regulations (such
as Labour Laws, Land Acquisition Act etc.) would not count as CSR expenditure under the
Companies Act.
3(v) “Any financial year” referred under sub-section (1) of section 135 of the Act read with the
Companies CSR Rule, 2014, implies ‘any of the three preceding financial years.
(vi) Expenditure incurred by Foreign Holding Company for CSR activities in India will qualify
as CSR spend of the Indian subsidiary if, the CSR expenditures are routed through Indian
subsidiaries and if the Indian subsidiary is required to do so as per section 135 of the Act.
(vii) ‘Registered Trust’ would include Trusts registered under Income Tax Act 1956, for those
States where registration of Trust is not mandatory.
(viii) Contribution to Corpus of a Trust/ society/ section 8 companies etc. will qualify as CSR
expenditure as long as (a) the Trust/ society/ section 8 companies etc. is created
exclusively for undertaking CSR activities or (b) where the corpus is created exclu sively
for a purpose directly relatable to a subject covered in Schedule VII of the Act.
Clarifications with respect to CSR on COVID
1. General Circular No. 10/2020 dated 23 rd March, 2020
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs have clarified that keeping in view of the spread of novel
Corona Virus (COVID-19) in India, its declaration as pandemic by the World Health
Organisation (WHO), and, decision of Government of India to treat this as a notified
disaster, spending of CSR funds for COVID-19 is eligible CSR activity.
Funds may be spent for various activities related to COVID-19 under item nos. (i) and
(xii) of Schedule VII relating to promotion of health care, including preventive health
care and sanitation, and, disaster management. Further, as per General Circular No.
21/2014 dated 18.06.2014, items in Schedule VII are broad based and may be
interpreted liberally for this purpose.
2. General Circular No. 01/2021 dated 13th January, 2021
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs, have made a clarification on spending of CSR funds for
Awareness and public outreach on COVID-19 Vaccination programme.
This Circular is in continuation to this Ministry's General Circular No. 10/2020 dated
23.03.2020 wherein it was clarified that spending of CSR funds for COVID19 is an eligible
CSR activity , it is further clarified that spending of CSR funds for carrying out awareness
campaigns/ programmes or public outreach campaigns on COVID-19 Vaccination
programme is an eligible CSR activity under item no. (i),(ii) and (xii) of Schedule VII of the
Companies Act, 2013 relating to promotion of health care, including preventive health care
and sanitization, promoting education, and, disaster management respectively.
The companies may undertake the aforesaid activities subject to fulfillment of Companies
(CSR Policy) Rules, 2014 and the circulars related to CSR, issued by this ministry from
time to time.
3. General Circular No. 05/2021, dated 22nd April, 2021
A clarification has been issued on spending of CSR funds for setting up makeshift hospitals
and temporary COVID Care facilities.
In continuation to this Ministry's General Circular No. 10/2020 dated 23.03.2020 wherein
it was clarified that spending of CSR funds for COVID-19 is an eligible CSR activity, it is
further clarified that spending of CSR funds for 'setting up makeshift hospitals and
temporary COVID Care facilities' is an eligible CSR activity under item nos. (i) and (xii) of
Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013 relating to promotion of health care, including
preventive health care, and, disaster management respectively.
QUESTIONS
DIVISION A – CASE SCENARIO / MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS
1. Mr. Ajay is a renowned finance professional with wide experience in banking operations.
Due to his experience, he has been appointed as director on the Board of various
companies. He is working as the Executive Director - Finance of Doon Carbonates Limited
(DCL) for the past 4-5 years and heading the finance department there. As per the object
clause of the Memorandum of Association of DCL, it can raise funds by way of loans for
the advancement of its business. Articles of Association of DCL authorizes the directors to
borrow up to INR 50 lakhs on behalf of the company after passing a valid board resolution
and any loans for amounts exceeding the above limit can be raised only after approval at
a general meeting.
Board of Directors of DCL raised INR 80 lakhs from Srikant Finance Services after passing
a board resolution and out of this amount, INR 60 lakhs was used to pay a legitimate
liability of DCL by the directors. DCL is a widely held company with around 5600 members
as per the members register. The 21 st AGM of DCL is convened on 1 st September 2020. A
total of 34 members attended the meeting out of which 7 members attended through proxy.
6 of such members are represented by single proxy, Mr. Das. The articles of DCL is silent
about the quorum.
Mr. Ajay is also director of Padmani Silk Limited (PSL). PSL was established around 25
years back as a private company operating as a micro business with 10 employees in a
three- room building. During these years, the company grew exceptionally and went public
and was also listed on SME exchange. PSL declares the interim dividend out of the
previous year’s undistributed profit on 31 st August 2020 on the occasion of the
25th anniversary of the company. PSL deposited the amount of said dividend in a separate
bank account with a NBFC on 4th of September, 2020.
Mr. Ajay hails from a farming family and carries on the business of cultivation and milling
of paddy. He is also the sole member of New-Deal Limited (NDL), a one person company.
NDL is operated as rice sheller and also deals in trading of high quality basmati rice. Mr.
Ajay’s father is operating as a nominee for the purposes of this OPC. The accounts
department of NDL prepared and published only Profit and Loss Account and Balance
Sheet as a financial statement and did not prepare cash flow statements and explanatory
notes to accounts. A statement of changes in equity is not required in the case of NDL.
Multiple Choice Questions
1.1 Regarding compliance for declaration and distribution of Interim dividend by PSL,
which of the following statements is correct?
(a) There is a violation of the provisions because interim dividend can only be
declared out of current year’s profits.
(b) There is no violation at all, and all the provisions prescribed by law have been
complied with.
(c) There is a violation because the bank account shall be designated and shall be
one of existing banks account of company.
(d) There is a violation because the bank account shall be opened with scheduled
banks only.
1.2 Which of the following statements is correct, with reference to the requirement for
financial Statements of ‘New Deal Limited’ (One Person Company)
(a) NDL fails to meet the requirement because its financial statement do not include
explanatory notes to accounts
(b) NDL fails to meet the requirement because its financial statements do not
include cash flow statement
(c) NDL fails to meet the requirement because its financial statements do not
include explanatory notes to account and cash flow statement
(d) NDL has complied with the requirements related to financial statements
1.3 The borrowing of the sum of INR 80 lakhs by the directors of DCL is
(a) Void-ab-initio
(b) Void
(c) Voidable
(d) Valid
1.4 Regarding the validity of the 21st Annual General Meeting of DCL, which of the
following statements is correct?
(a) The meeting doesn’t have a quorum, because 30 members need to be present
in person at the meeting.
(b) The meeting is valid and has a quorum because 30 members are present at
meeting either personally or through a proxy.
(c) The meeting is valid and has a quorum, because only 5 members are required
to be present, either personally or through a proxy, if the number of members as
on the date of the meeting is more than five thousand but not more than ten
thousand
(d) The meeting is valid and has a quorum, because only 15 members are required
to be present, either personally or through a proxy, if the number of members as
on the date of the meeting is more than five thousand but not more than ten
thousand
2. Mr. M. Mishra is a director of Superior Carbonates and Chemicals Limited (SCCL). SCCL
was incorporated by Mr. S. K. Mishra (father of Mr. M. Mishra) on 05th July 1995 as a public
company. SCCL accepts a loan of ` 1.5 crores from Mr. M. Mishra for short term purpose
and the loan is expected to be repaid after twenty four months. SCCL in its books of
account, records the receipt as a loan under non-current liabilities. At the time of advancing
loan, Mr. M. Mishra affirms in writing that such amount is not being given out of funds
acquired by him by borrowing or accepting loans or deposits from others and complete
details of his loan transactions are furnished in the boards’ report.
DBSL which is an unlisted public company, also accept the deposits from the public as on
1st November 2018, which is due for repayment on 30 th September 2023. DBSL also
accepts a LAP (Loan against property) for a term of 10 years from a financial institution on
18th June 2020. Charge was created on that day, but DBSL has neglected to register the
charge with the registrar. Finally, the application for registration of charge is furnished on
18th August 2020.
SCCL has registered office in Paonta-sahib (Himachal Pradesh) and corporate office is
situated in Dehradun (Uttarakhand) but around 15% of members whose name is entered
in members register are residents of Nainital (Uttarakhand). SCCL has a liaison Office at
Nainital. Management of the company is willing to place, the Register of Members at the
Nainital Liaison Office.
DBSL convene its 7 th AGM on 10th September 2020 at the registered office of the company.
Notice for same was served on 21 st August 2020. 78% of members gave consent to
convening AGM at shorter notice due to ambiguity and possibility of another lockdown
starting from 11 th September 2020 on account of the second wave of COVID-19.
Multiple Choice Questions
2.1 Pick the right statement regarding SCCL’s willingness to keep and maintain the
register of members at the Nainital liaison office.
(a) Register of members shall be kept at either registered office or within the same
city that too after passing the resolution, hence SCCL is not correct in placing it
at the Nainital liaison office
(b) Register of members cannot be kept at any other place by SCCL, without
passing an ordinary resolution
(c) Register of members can be kept at Nainital liaison office, after passing a special
resolution, because more than 1/10 th of the total members entered in the register
of members reside there
(d) Register of members cannot be kept at Nainital liaison office, even after passing
a special resolution, because less than 1/5 th of the total members entered in the
register of members reside there
2.2 With reference to deposit accepted by DBSL and its duration, you are required to
identify which of the following statements is correct:
(a) There is no requirement relating to the duration of deposit, DBSL can accept a
deposit for any duration.
(b) Since DBSL is an unlisted company, provision relating to the duration of the
deposit is not applicable.
(c) There is a provision of a minimum duration of six months, but no upper cap to
length is provided. Hence deposit accepted by DBSL is in compliance to
provisions of Law.
(d) Acceptance of deposits by DBSL is in violation of provision of law, because the
maximum period of acceptance of deposit cannot exceed thirty-six months.
2.3 With reference to application to the registrar for registration of charge by DBSL, which
of the following statements is correct?
(a) The charge cannot be registered now, even if the Registrar permits the same.
(b) The charge can be registered, if registrar permits with payment of ad-valorem
fee.
(c) The charge can be registered, if registrar permits but with payment of an
additional fee.
(d) The charge can be registered, with payment of a standard fee.
2.4 With reference to the loan advanced by Mr. M. Mishra to SCCL, state whether the
same is to be classified as a deposit or not?
(a) Deposit, because any sum advanced by the director whether loan or otherwise
is always classified as a deposit.
(b) Deposit, because the tenor of the loan is for a period of more than six months.
(c) Not a deposit, because such amount is recorded as loan in books of account of
SCCL.
(d) Not a deposit, because the written declaration is provided by Mr. M. Mishra, who
was a director when the loan was advanced that the loan is not being given out
of funds acquired by him by borrowing or accepting loans or deposits from
others.
2.5 Considering the provision relating to length of Notice for AGM, pick out the right
option:
(a) Notice served by DBSL is not valid, because notice given within a shorter
duration has to be consented to by all the members entitled to vote at AGM.
(b) Notice served by DBSL is not valid, because notice given within a shorter
duration has to be consented to by at-least 95% of members entitled to vote
thereat.
(c) Notice served by DBSL is valid because the shorter length has been consented
to by 75% of members entitled to vote thereat.
(d) Notice served by DBSL is not valid, because notice given within a shorter length
duration needs has to by at-least 50% of the members entitled to vote at AGM
that too in writing.
3. Which of the following statement is contrary to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013?
(a) A private company can make a private placement of its securities.
(b) The company has to pass a special resolution for private placement.
(c) Minimum offer per person should have Market Value of ` 20,000.
(d) A public company can make a private placement of its securities.
4. Vishal lends a horse to Preet. The horse is vicious, which is known to Vishal but he does
not disclose the fact to Preet. The horse runs away. Preet is thrown and injured. As per
the provisions of the Contract Act, 1872, which is the correct statement:
(a) Preet is responsible for his injury.
(b) Though the horse belonged to Vishal but he cannot be held responsible
(c) Vishal is responsible to Preet for damage sustained
(d) No one can be held responsible for the damage sustained as no one can take
guarantee for the horse
5. As per the Indian Contract Act, 1872, any guarantee which has been obtained by the
means of misrepresentation made by the creditor concerning a material part of the
transaction, is:
(a) Valid
(b) Invalid
(c) outside the ambit of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
(d) not revocable if the damage sustained is less than 10% of the amount for which the
guarantee is given
DIVISION B - DETAILED QUESTIONS
COMPANY LAW
The Companies Act, 2013
1. The Board of Directors of Amit Ltd. requested its Statutory Auditor to accept the
assignment of designing and implementation of suitable financial information syste m to
strengthen the internal control mechanism of the Company. How will you approach to this
proposal, as an Statutory Auditor of Amit Ltd., taking into account the consequences, if
any, of accepting this proposal?
2. The Income Tax Authorities in the current financial year 2019-20 observed, during the
assessment proceedings, a need to re-open the accounts of Qurie Ltd. for the financial
year 2008-09 and, therefore, filed an application before the National Company Law
Tribunal (NCLT) to issue the order to Qurie Ltd. for re-opening of its accounts and recasting
the financial statements for the financial year 2008-09. Examine the validity of the
application filed by the Income Tax Authorities to NCLT.
3. (i) Mr. Bindra is holding 950 equity shares of Bio safe Herbals, a section 8 company. Bio
safe Herbals is planning to declare dividend in the Annual General Meeting for the
Financial Year ended 31-03-2020. Examine whether the act of the company is in
accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
(ii) Kiara, holder of 5000 equity shares of ` 100 each of Kanpur Leather Shoes Limited
did not pay final call of ` 10 per share. Kanpur Leather Shoes Limited declared
dividend @ 10%. Examine with reference to relevant provisions of the Companies
Act, 2013, the amount of dividend Kiara should receive.
4. A General Meeting was scheduled to be held on 15th April, 2019 at 3.00 P.M. As per the
notice the members who are unable to attend a meeting in person can appoint a proxy
and the proxy forms duly filled should be sent to the company so as to reach at least 48
hours before the meeting. Mr. X, a member of the company appoints Mr. Y as his proxy
and the proxy form dated 10-04-2019 was deposited by Mr. Y with the company at its
registered Office on 11-04-2019. Similarly, another member Mr. W also gives two
separate proxies to two individuals named Mr. M and Mr. N. In the case of Mr. M, the
proxy dated 12-04-2019 was deposited with the company on the same day and the proxy
form in favour of Mr. N was deposited on 14-04-2019. All the proxies viz., Y, M and N
were present before the meeting.
According to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, who would be the persons
allowed to represent as proxies for members X and W respectively?
5. Shiva Cement Limited is engaged in the manufacture of different types of cements and
has got a good brand value. Over the years, it has built a good reputation and its Balance
Sheet as at March 31, 2020 showed the following position:
1. Authorized Share Capital (25,00,000 equity shares of ` 10/- each) ` 2,50,00,000
2. Issued, subscribed and paid-up Share Capital (10,00,000 equity shares of ` 10/-
each, fully paid-up) ` 1,00,00,000
3. Free Reserves ` 3,00,00,000
The Board of Directors are proposing to declare a bonus issue of 1 share for every 2
shares held by the existing shareholders. The Board wants to know the conditions and
the manner of issuing bonus shares under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
6. Pristine Limited, a listed public company, conducted its Annual General Meeting on
31st August, 2020. However, 10 days have passed since 31 st August, 2020, but it has
still not filed report on Annual General Meeting. The Accountant of the company has
approached you to advise them whether Pristine Limited is required to file report on
Annual General Meeting?
7. Keya Limited decides to issue 1,00,000 securities of the company. The company decides
to publish an advertisement of the prospectus. Enumerate to the company about
necessary contents of its memorandum to be specified therein.
8. Nadeem incorporated a "One Person Company" making his sister Nisha as the nominee.
Nisha is leaving India permanently due to her marriage abroad. Due to this fact, she is
withdrawing her consent of nomination in the said One Person Company. Taking into
considerations the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 answer the questions given
below.
(A) If Nisha is leaving India permanently, is it mandatory for her to withdraw her
nomination in the said One Person Company?
(B) If Nisha maintained the status of Resident of India after her marriage, then can she
continue her nomination in the said One Person Company?
OTHER LAWS
The Indian Contract Act, 1872
9. Akash is a famous manufacturer of leather goods. He appoints Prashant as his agent.
Prashant is entrusted with the work of recovering money from various traders to whom
Akash sells leather goods. Prashant is paid a monthly remuneration of ` 15,000.
Prashant during a particular month recovers ` 40,000 from traders on account of Akash.
Prashant gives back ` 25,000 to Akash, after deducting his salary.
Examine with reference to relevant provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, whether
act of Prashant is valid.
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
10. (i) Calculate the date of maturity of bill of exchange drawn on 1.6.2019, payable 120
days after considering the relevant provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act,
1881.
(ii) Chandra issues a cheque for ` 50,000/- in favour of Daye. Chandra has sufficient
amount in his account with the Bank. The cheque was not presented within
reasonable time to the Bank for payment and the Bank, in the meantime, became
bankrupt. Decide under the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881,
whether Daye can recover the money from Chandra?
The General Clauses Act, 1897
11. (i) Mr. Apar and Mr. New, both aspiring Chartered Accountants have met in a
conference for CA students. Both are having an argument about the meaning of
Financial Year. They have approached you as a senior in the profession to guide
them about the meaning of Financial Year as per the provisions of the General
Clauses Act, 1872. Also, brief them about the difference between a calendar year
and financial year.
(ii) What is the meaning of service by post as per provisions of the General Clauses
Act, 1897?
Interpretation of Statutes
12. At the time of interpreting a statutes what will be the effect of 'Usage' or 'customs and
Practices'?
SUGGESTED ANSWERS
(ii) the affairs of the company were mismanaged during the relevant period, c asting a
doubt on the reliability of financial statements:
However, no order shall be made in respect of re-opening of books of account relating to
a period earlier than eight financial years immediately preceding the current financial year.
In the given instance, an application was filed for re-opening and re-casting of the financial
statements of Qurie Ltd. for the financial year 2008-2009 which is beyond 8 financial years
immediately preceding the current financial year.
Though application filed by the Income Tax Authorities to NCLT is valid, its
recommendation for reopening and recasting of financial statements for the period earlier
than eight financial years immediately preceding the current financial year i.e. 2019 -2020,
is invalid.
3. (i) According to Section 8(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, the companies licenced under
Section 8 of the Act (Formation of companies with Charitable Objects, etc.) are
prohibited from paying any dividend to their members. Their profits are intended to
be applied only in promoting the objects for which they are formed.
Hence, in the instant case, the proposed act of Bio safe Herbals, a company licenced
under Section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013, which is planning to declare dividend,
is not in accordance to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
(ii) As per the proviso to section 127 of the Companies Act, 2013, no offence will be
deemed to have been committed by a director for adjusting the calls in arrears
remaining unpaid or any other sum due from a member against the dividend declared
by the company.
Thus, as per the given facts, Kanpur Leather Shoes Limited can adjust the unpaid
call money of ` 50,000 against the declared dividend of 10%, i.e. 5,00,000 x 10/100
= 50,000. Hence, call money of ` 50,000 not paid by Kiara can be adjusted fully from
the entitled dividend amount of ` 50,000 payable to her.
4. A Proxy is an instrument in writing executed by a shareholder authorizing another person
to attend a meeting and to vote thereat on his behalf and in his absence. As per the
provisions of Section 105 of the Companies Act, 2013, every shareholder who is entitled
to attend and vote has a statutory right to appoint another person as his proxy. It is not
necessary that the proxy be a member of the company. Further, any provision in the articles
of association of the company requiring instrument of proxy to be lodged with the company
more than 48 hours before a meeting shall have effect as if 48 hours had been specified
therein. The members have a right to revoke the proxy’s authority by voting himself before
the proxy has voted but once the proxy has voted the member cannot retract his authority.
Where two proxy instruments by the same shareholder are lodged of in such a manner that
one is lodged before and the other after the expiry of the date fixed for lodging proxies, the
former will be counted.
Thus, in case of member X, the proxy Y will be permitted to vote on his behalf as form for
appointing proxy was submitted within the permitted time.
However, in the case of Member W, the proxy M (and not Proxy N) will be permitted to vote
as the proxy authorizing N to vote was deposited in less than 48 hours before the meeting.
5. According to Section 63 of the Companies Act, 2013, a company may issue fully paid -up
bonus shares to its members, in any manner whatsoever, out of -
(i) its free reserves;
(ii) the securities premium account; or
(iii) the capital redemption reserve account.
Provided that no issue of bonus shares shall be made by capitalising reserves created by
the revaluation of assets.
Conditions for issue of Bonus Shares: No company shall capitalise its profits or reserves
for the purpose of issuing fully paid-up bonus shares, unless—
(i) it is authorised by its Articles;
(ii) it has, on the recommendation of the Board, been authorised in the general meeting
of the company;
(iii) it has not defaulted in payment of interest or principal in respect of fixed deposits or
debt securities issued by it;
(iv) it has not defaulted in respect of payment of statutory dues of the employees, such
as, contribution to provident fund, gratuity and bonus;
(v) the partly paid-up shares, if any, outstanding on the date of allotment, are made fully
paid-up;
(vi) it complies with such conditions as are prescribed by Rule 14 of the Companies
(Share Capital and debentures) Rules, 2014 which states that the company which
has once announced the decision of its Board recommending a bonus issue, shall not
subsequently withdraw the same.
Further, the company has to ensure that the bonus shares shall not be issued in lieu of
dividend.
For the issue of bonus shares Shiva Cement Limited will require reserves of ` 50,00,000
(i.e. half of ` 1,00,00,000 being the paid-up share capital), which is readily available with
the company. Hence, after following the above conditions relating to the issue of bonus
shares, the company may proceed for a bonus issue of 1 share for every 2 shares held by
the existing shareholders.
6. According to Section 121, every listed public company shall prepare a report on each
annual general meeting including the confirmation to the effect that the meeting was
convened held and conducted as per the provisions of the Act and the rules made
thereunder. A copy of the report is to be filed with the Registrar in Form No. MGT. 15 within
thirty days of the conclusion of AGM along with the prescribed fee. If the company does
not file such report on Annual General Meeting within 30 days of the conclusion of the
Annual General Meeting then the company and defaulting officers are liable for prescribed
penalties.
Since, Pristine Ltd. is a listed company, hence it has to file a copy of 1annual Report with
the Registrar within 30 days from 31 st August, 2020.
7. According to Section 30, where an advertisement of any prospectus of a company is
published in any manner, it shall be necessary to specify therein the contents of its
memorandum as regards the following:
(i) the objects,
(ii) the liability of members and the amount of share capital of the company,
(iii) the names of the signatories to the memorandum,
(iv) the number of shares subscribed for by the signatories, and
(v) the capital structure of the company.
8. As per Rule 3 & 4 of the Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014 following the answers:
(A) Yes, it is mandatory for Nisha to withdraw her nomination in the said OPC as she is
leaving India permanently as only a natural person who is an Indian citizen and
resident in India shall be a nominee in OPC.
(B) Yes, Nisha can continue her nomination in the said OPC, if she maintained the status
of Resident of India after her marriage by staying in India for a period of not less than
182 days during the immediately preceding financial year.
9. The given problem is based on the provision related to ‘agency coupled with interest’.
According to Section 202 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 an agency becomes irrevocable
where the agent has himself an interest in the property which forms the subject -matter of
the agency, and such an agency cannot, in the absence of an express provision in the
contract, be terminated to the prejudice of such interest.
In the given instance, Akash appointed Prashant as his agent to recover money from
various traders to whom Akash sold his leather goods, on a monthly remuneration of
` 15,000. Prashant during a month recovers ` 40,000 from traders on account of Akash.
Prashant after deducting his salary give the rest amount to Akash. In the said case, interest
was created in favour of Prashant and the said agency is not revocable, therefore, the act
of Prashant is valid.
10. (i) Date of maturity of the bill of exchange: In this case the day of presentment for sight
is to be excluded i.e. 1st June, 2019. The period of 120 days ends on 29th September,
2019 (June 29 days + July 31 days + August 31 Days + September 29 days = 120
days). Three days of grace are to be added. It falls due on 2nd October, 2019, which
happens to be a public holiday. As such it will fall due on 1st October, 2019 i.e., the
next preceding Business Day.
(ii) Section 84(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 provides that cheque should
be presented to Bank within reasonable time. If cheque is not presented within
reasonable time, meanwhile the drawer suffers actual damage, the drawer is
discharged to the extent of such actual damage. This would be so if the cheque would
have been passed if it was presented within reasonable time. As per section 84(2), in
determining what is a reasonable time, regard shall be had to (a) the nature of the
instrument (b) the usage of trade and of bankers, and (c) facts of the particular case.
The drawer will get discharge, but the holder of the cheque will be treated as creditor
of the bank, in place of drawer. He will be entitled to recover the amount from Bank
[section 84(3)].
In the above case drawer i.e. Chandra has suffered damage as cheque was not
presented by Daye within reasonable time. Hence, Chandra will be discharged but
Daye will be the creditor of bank for the amount of cheque and can recover the amount
from the bank.
11. (i) Financial Year: According to section 3(21) of the General Clauses Act, 1897,
financial year shall mean the year commencing on the first day of April.
The term Year has been defined under Section 3(66) as a year reckoned according
to the British calendar. Thus, as per General Clauses Act, Year means calendar year
which starts from January to December.
Difference between Financial Year and Calendar Year: Financial year starts from
first day of April but Calendar Year starts from first day of January.
(ii) Meaning of Service by post: According to section 27 of the General Clauses Act,
1897, where any legislation or regulation requires any document to be served by post,
then unless a different intention appears, the service shall be deemed to be effected
by:
(i) properly addressing
(ii) pre-paying, and
(iii) posting by registered post.
A letter containing the document to have been effected at the time at which the letter
would be delivered in the ordinary course of post.
12. Effect of usage: Usage or practice developed under the statute is indicative of the
meaning recognized to its words by contemporary opinion. A uniform notorious practice
continued under an old statute and inaction of the Legislature to amend the same are
important factors to show that the practice so followed was based on correct understanding
of the law. When the usage or practice receives judicial or legislative approval it gains
additional weight.
In the said Schedule VII, after item (xi) and the entries relating thereto, the following
item and entries shall be inserted, namely:
“(xii) disaster management, including relief, rehabilitation and reconstruction
activities.”
[Enforcement Date: 30 th May, 2019]
[Amendment to be incorporated on Pg. 9.38 of SM]
(B) Amendments related to - Notification G.S.R. 776(E) dated 11 th October, 2019
The Central Government has amended the Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013.
In the said Schedule VII, for item (ix) and the entries relating thereto, the following
item and entries shall be substituted, namely:
“(ix) Contribution to incubators funded by Central Government or State Government
or any agency or Public Sector Undertaking of Central Government or State
Government, and contributions to public funded Universities, Indian Institute of
Technology (IITs), National Laboratories and Autonomous Bodies (established under
the auspices of Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Indian Council of
Medical Research (ICMR), Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR),
Department of Atomic Energy (DAE), Defence Research and Development
Organisation (DRDO), Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Department of Science
and Technology (DST), Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology) engaged
in conducting research in science, technology, engineering and medicine aimed at
promoting Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).”
[Enforcement Date: 11 th October, 2019]
[Amendment to be incorporated on Pg. 9.38 of SM]
(C) Amendments related to - Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019
Following sections of the Companies Act, 2013 have been amended by the
Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019 through Notification No. S.O. 2947(E) dated 14 th
August, 2019 [the sections contained therein shall deemed to have come into force
on 15th August, 2019]
In section 132—
(i) after sub-section (1), the following sub-section shall be inserted, namely:—
“(1A) The National Financial Reporting Authority shall perform its functions
through such divisions as may be prescribed.”
[Amendment to be incorporated on Pg. 9.16 of SM]
(ii) after sub-section (3), the following sub-sections shall be inserted, namely:—
“(3A) Each division of the National Financial Reporting Authority shall be
presided over by the Chairperson or a full-time Member authorised by the
Chairperson.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this clause, the expression “proficiency” means the
proficiency of the independent director as ascertained from the online proficiency self-
assessment test conducted by the institute notified under sub-section (1) of section 150.
[Amendment to be incorporated on Pg. 9.26 of SM]
(F) Amendments related to - Notification G.S.R. 313(E).—dated 26th May, 2020
The Central Government has amended the Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013.
In Schedule VII, item (viii), after the words “Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund”,
the words “or Prime Minister’s Citizen Assistance and Relief in Emergency Situations
Fund (PM CARES Fund)” shall be inserted.
[Enforcement Date: 28 th March, 2020]
[Amendment to be incorporated on Pg. 9.38 of SM]
PART II- OTHER LAWS
[I] THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872
Amendment via the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, dated 9 th August, 2019. The
amendment is effective with effect from 31 st October, 2019.
As per the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, in the Indian Contract Act, 1872, in
sub-section (2) of section 1, words, "except the State of Jammu and Kashmir" shall be omitted.
Now, Section 1 will be read as under,
‘Short title- This Act may be called the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
Extent, Commencement- It extends to the whole of India and it shall come into force on the
first day of September, 1872.
Saving- Nothing herein contained shall affect the provisions of any Statute, Act or Regulation
not hereby expressly repealed, nor any usage or custom of trade, nor any incident of any
contract, not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act.’
[II] THE GENERAL CLAUSES ACT, 1897
Amendment via the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, dated 9 th August, 2019. The
amendment is effective with effect from 31st October, 2019.
As per the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, the General Clauses Act, 1897 has
been extended as a whole.
# Here, SM means Study Material (i.e. Page number of the Study material in reference to
relevant provisions)
QUESTIONS
(ii) WML violates the law, because unpaid dividend need to transfer to unpaid
dividend account by 19th July 2020.
(iii) WML doesn’t violate the law, because an unpaid dividend transferred to unpaid
dividend account prior to 21 st July 2020.
(iv) WML doesn’t violate the law, because an unpaid dividend can be transferred to
unpaid dividend account at any time within 90 days from the date of declaration.
2. Mr. Purshottam Prasad, a business graduate from leading B-School, running the chain of
restaurants; as sole proprietor concern; based in Chennai. Mr. Prasad being dynamic
businessman, in order to develop the business; decided to give corporate form to his
business; but concerned with dilution of the control over business decisions.
Mr. Prasad, during some journey met Mr. Chinmay Dass; who is school days friend of Mr.
Prasad and presently working in one of leading corporate advisory firm. Mr. Prasad seeks
advice from Mr. Dass, regarding conversion of sole proprietorship concern to company and
also explain his intention to keep the entire control in his hand. Mr. Dass told, about new
type of company; which can be formed under Companies Act, 2013; One Person Company
(OPC). Mr. Dass quoted section 2 (62), which define 'one person company' , a company
which has only one person as a member.
Mr. Prasad, felt OPC is correct form of business for him, hence promotes an OPC ‘Casa
Hangout Private Limited’ (One Person Company) on 14 th September 2019, to which he
sold his sole proprietor business and himself became sole member. Mr. Prasad, appointed
his younger son Mr. Vijay, who was 21 year old then; as Nominee to OPC. Mr. Anand who
is old friend of Mr. Prasad was appointed as director of OPC, Mr. Prasad himself also
become director of company.
Mr. Vijay is professional photographer, and for some certification course went to abroad
on 23rd October 2019. He came back on 1 st of March 2020. He established photo-studio in
form of OPC ‘Best Click (OPC) Private Limited’ on 20 th March 2020, in which Mr. Prasad
is nominee and he became sole member. In mean time, Mr. Vijay also gave his consent
as nominee to another OPC in which his elder brother Mr. Shankar is sole member.
Mr. Prasad met an accident on 25 th March, 2020, in which he lost his life. Nomination
clause invoked, resultantly Mr. Vijay has to take charge over ‘Casa Hangout (OPC) Private
Limited’ (One Person Company) as member with immediate effect. On 30 th March, 2020
Mr. Shankar was appointed as new nominee to ‘Casa Hangout (OPC) Private Limited’, who
gave written consent on 31 st March 2020. Mr. Shankar who is investment banker by
profession, is of opinion that ‘Casa Hangout (OPC) Private Limited’ need to amend its
object clause and add ‘carry out investment in securities of body corporate’ as one of
object.
Financial Period closed on 31 st March 2020. Financial statements of ‘Casa Hangout (OPC)
Private Limited’, which is not containing cash flow statement; signed by Mr. Anand (who
left as only director after death of Mr. Prasad).
A. With reference to appointment of Mr. Vijay and Mr. Shankar as nominee to ‘Casa
Hangout (OPC) Private Limited’, out of followings, who is eligible to be nominee of
OPC?
(i) Any natural person excluding minor
(ii) Any legal person excluding minor
(iii) Any natural person, who is resident of India; but excluding minor
(iv) Any natural person, who is resident as well as citizen of India; but excluding
minor
B. Mr. Shankar if wish to withdraw his consent as nominee, can do so; by giving written
notice to
(i) Director of OPC and to sole member of company
(ii) Director of OPC and to Registrar of companies
(iii) Sole member of company and to OPC
(iv) Sole member of company and to Registrar of companies
C. With reference to legal position of Mr. Vijay as member/s and nominee/s to various
OPCs, Which of the following statement is correct in reference to ceiling limit in
relation to membership and being nominee to OPC? A person, other than minor; at
specific point of time;
(i) Can be member in any number of OPCs but nominee in one OPC
(ii) Can be member in one OPC and nominee in any number of OPCs
(iii) Can be member in one OPC and nominee in another one OPCs
(iv) Can be member and nominee both in any number of OPCs
D. Which of following statement is correct, in reference to requirement for financial
Statements of ‘Casa Hangout (OPC) Private Limited’
(i) Must be signed by one director
(ii) Must be signed by at-least by two directors
(iii) Must contain cash flow statement as part of financial statements
(iv) None of the above
E. With reference to opinion of Mr. Shankar to add ‘carry out investment in securities of
body corporate’ object, ‘Casa Hangout (OPC) Private Limited’
(i) Can’t carry out non-banking financial investment activities & investment in
securities of body corporate
(ii) Can’t carry out non-banking financial investment, but can invest in securities of
body corporate’
(iii) Can carry-out non-banking financial investment & invest in securities of body
corporate’
(iv) None of the above
3. A is residing in Delhi and has a house in Mumbai. A appoints B by a power of attorney to
take care of his house. State the nature of agency created between A and B:
(a) Implied agency
(b) Agency by ratification
(c) Agency by necessity
(d) Express agency
4. One Person Company shall file a copy of the duly adopted financial statements to the
Registrar in:
(a) 30 days of the date of meeting in which it was adopted
(b) 90 days of the date of meeting in which it was adopted
(c) 90 days from the closure of the financial statement
(d) 180 days from the closure of the financial statement
5. A guarantee which extend to a series of transactions is called
(a) Special Guarantee
(b) Continuing Guarantee
(c) Specific Guarantee
(d) None of the above
6. An aid that expresses the scope, object and purpose of the Act—
(a) Title of the Act
(b) Heading of the Chapter
(c) Preamble
(d) Definitional sections
7. Roma along with her six friends has got incorporated Roma Trading Ltd. in May 2019. She
kept the paid-up share capital at ` 30 lacs. Further, in April 2020, she noticed that in the
last financial year, the turnover of the company was well below ` 2 crores. Advise whether
the company can be treated as a ‘small company’.
(a) Roma Trading Ltd. is definitely a ‘small company’ since its paid-up capital is much
below ` 50 lacs and also its turnover has not exceeded the threshold limit of ` 2
crores.
(b) The concept of ‘small company’ is applicable only in case of a private limited
company/OPC and therefore, despite meeting the criteria of ‘small company’ it being
a public limited company cannot enjoy benefits of ‘small company’.
(c) Unlike a private limited company/OPC which automatically becomes a ‘small
company’ as soon as it meets the criteria of ‘small company’, Roma Trading Ltd. being
a public limited company has to maintain the norms applicable to a ‘small company’
continuously for two years so that, thereafter, it is treated as a ‘small company’.
(d) If all the shareholders of Roma Trading Ltd. give an undertaking to th e ROC stating
that they will not let the paid share capital and also turnover exceed the limits
applicable to a ‘small company’ in the next two years, then it can be treated as a
‘small company’.
8. Red Flag Ltd., which has its registered office at Delhi and having 12500 members is holding
its Annual General Meeting in Ashoka Hotel. Despite swanky arrangements most of the
members did not turn up and quorum was not present within half an hour of the schedule
time of the meeting, as a result meeting was adjourned. However, due to heavy booking
schedule, hotel authorities could not make available, for adjourned meeting, sufficient
space in the same hall where meeting was originally called but allowed conduct of meeting
in a different hall on a different floor next week at same time. Please advise the option
available to board:
(a) The meeting stands adjourned automatically to the same place and time next week
as per provisions of law. There is no alternate but to hold meeting in the same hall,
(b) As same banquet hall is not available meeting can be held at different place as may
be decided appropriate by the Board,
(c) As the same hall is not available to conduct meeting after one week, a fresh notice of
21 days is needed for a different location,
(d) As the same hall is not available to conduct the meeting, the company needs to
conduct meeting electronically through internet and give sufficient notice to
shareholders,
9. Shreyas Mechanics Limited owns a plot of land which was purchased long before. As the
property rates are going up, it is decided to revalue the plot at fair value which is moderately
ten times the original price, thus resulting in a revaluation profit of ` 20,00,000. The Board
of Directors is keen to utilize ` 20,00,000 along with free reserves of ` 24,00,000 for
declaration of dividend at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting (AGM) to be held on
28th September, 2019. Advise the company.
(a) ` 20,00,000 are to be excluded from the distributable profits as the same cannot be
utilized towards declaration of dividend.
(b) Only 25% of ` 20,00,000 can be utilized as distributable profits towards declaration
of dividend.
(i) XYZ Private Limited may accept the deposits from its members to the extent of `
60.00 Lakh, if the aggregate of its paid-up capital, free reserves and security premium
account is ` 60.00 Lakh.
(ii) A Government Company, which is eligible to accept deposits under Section 76 of the
Companies Act, 2013 cannot accept deposits from public exceeding 25% of the
aggregate of its paid- up capital, free reserves and security premium account.
6. What are the powers of Registrar to make entries of satisfaction and release of charges in
the absence of any intimation from the company. Discuss this matter in the light of
provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
7. Chetan Ltd. issued a notice for holding its Annual general meeting on 7 th November 2019.
The notice was posted to the members on 16 th October 2019. Some members of the
company allege that the company had not complied with the provisions of the Companies
Act, 2013 with regard to the period of notice and as such the meeting was valid. Referring
to the provisions of the Act, decide:
(i) Whether the meeting has been validly called?
(ii) If there is a shortfall, state and explain by how many days does the notice fall short
of the statutory requirement?
(iii) Can the delay in giving notice be condoned?
Other Laws
8. Sandeep guarantees for Gaurav, a retail textile merchant, for an amount of ` 1,00,000, for
which Sharma, the supplier may from time to time supply goods on credit basis to Gaurav
during the next 3 months.
After 1 month, Sandeep revokes the guarantee, when Sharma had supplied goods on
credit for ` 40,000. Referring to the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, decide
whether Sandeep is discharged from all the liabilities to Sharma for any subsequent credit
supply. What would be your answer in case Gaurav makes default in paying back Sharma
for the goods already supplied on credit i.e. ` 40,000?
9. Raj gives his umbrella to Manoj during raining season to be used for two days during
Examinations. Manoj keeps the umbrella for a week. While going to Raj’s house to return
the umbrella, Manoj accidently slips and the umbrella is badly damaged. Taking into
account the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, who will bear the loss and why?
10. Rahul drew a cheque in favour of Aman. After having issued the cheque; Rahul requested
Aman not to present the cheque for payment and gave a stop payment request to the bank
in respect of the cheque issued to Aman. Decide, under the provisions of the Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881 whether the said acts of Rahul constitute an offence?
11. Referring to the provisions of the General Clauses Act, 1897, find out the day/ date on
which the following Act/Regulation comes into force. Give reasons also.
(1) An Act of Parliament which has not specifically mentioned a particular date.
(2) The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue of Capital and Disclosure
Requirements) (Fifth Amendment) Regulations, 2015 was issued by SEBI vide
Notification dated 14 th August, 2015 with effect from 1 st January, 2016.
12. ‘Preamble does not over-ride the plain provision of the Act.' Comment. Also give suitable
example.
SUGGESTED ANSWERS/HINTS
Provided that a member may request for delivery of any document through a particular
mode, for which he shall pay such fees as may be determined by the company in its annual
general meeting.
Thus, if a member wants the notice to be served on him only by registered post at his
residential address at Kanpur for which he has deposited sufficient money, the notice must
be served accordingly, otherwise service will not be deemed to have been effected.
Accordingly, the questions as asked may be answered as under:
(i) The contention of Vijay shall be tenable, for the reason that the notice was not
properly served.
(ii) In the given circumstances, the company is bound to serve a valid notice to Vijay by
registered post at his residential address at Kanpur and not outside India.
2. Disqualification of auditor: According to section 141(3)(d)(i) of the Companies Act, 2013,
a person who, or his relative or partner holds any security of the company or its subsidiary
or of its holding or associate company a subsidiary of such holding company, which carries
voting rights, such person cannot be appointed as auditor of the company. Provided that
the relative of such person may hold security or interest in the company of face value not
exceeding 1 lakh rupees as prescribed under the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules,
2014.
In this case, Mr. Suresh, Chartered Accountants, did not hold any such security. But Mrs.
Kamala, his wife held equity shares of Shekhar Limited of face value ` 1 lakh, which is
within the specified limit.
Further Section 141(4) provides that if an auditor becomes subject, after his appointment,
to any of the disqualifications specified in sub-section 3 of section 141, he shall be deemed
to have vacated his office of auditor. Hence, Suresh & Company can continue to function
as auditors of the Company even after 15 th October, 2019 i.e. after the investment made
by his wife in the equity shares of Shekhar Limited.
3. As per section 26(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, every prospectus issued by or on behalf
of a public company either with reference to its formation or subsequently, or by or on
behalf of any person who is or has been engaged or interested in the formation of a public
company, shall be dated and signed and shall state such information and set out such
reports on financial information as may be specified by the Securities and Exchange Board
in consultation with the Central Government.
Provided that until the Securities and Exchange Board specifies the information and reports
on financial information under this sub-section, the regulations made by the Securities and
Exchange Board under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, in respect
of such financial information or reports on financial information shall apply.
Prospectus issued make a declaration about the compliance of the provisions of this Act
and a statement to the effect that nothing in the prospectus is contrary to the provisions of
this Act, the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 and the Securities and Exchange
Board of India Act, 1992 and the rules and regulations made thereunder.
Accordingly, the Board of Directors of Ramesh Ltd. who proposes to issue the prospectus
shall provide such reports on financial information as may be specified by the Securities
and Exchange Board in consultation with the Central Government in compliance with the
above stated provision and make a declaration about the compliance of the above stated
provisions.
4. According to Section 63 of the Companies Act, 2013, a company may issue fully paid -up
bonus shares to its members, in any manner whatsoever, out of -
(i) its free reserves;
(ii) the securities premium account; or
(iii) the capital redemption reserve account.
Provided that no issue of bonus shares shall be made by capitalising reserves created by
the revaluation of assets.
Conditions for issue of Bonus Shares: No company shall capitalise its profits or reserves
for the purpose of issuing fully paid-up bonus shares, unless—
(i) it is authorised by its Articles;
(ii) it has, on the recommendation of the Board, been authorised in the general meeting
of the company;
(iii) it has not defaulted in payment of interest or principal in respect of fixed deposits or
debt securities issued by it;
(iv) it has not defaulted in respect of payment of statutory dues of the employees, such
as, contribution to provident fund, gratuity and bonus;
(v) the partly paid-up shares, if any outstanding on the date of allotment, are made fully
paid-up;
(vi) it complies with such conditions as may be prescribed.
But the company has to ensure that the bonus shares shall not be issued in lieu of dividend.
To issue bonus shares, company will need reserves of ` 50,00,000 (half of `1,00,00,000),
which is available with the company. Hence, after following the above compliances on
issuing bonus shares under the Companies Act, 2013, Surya Ltd. may proceed for a bonus
issue of 1 share for every 2 shares held by the existing shareholders.
5. (i) As per the provisions of Section 73(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 3
of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014, as amended by the
Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Amendment Rules, 2016, a company shall
accept any deposit from its members, together with the amount of other deposits
outstanding as on the date of acceptance of such deposits not exceeding thirty five
per cent of the aggregate of the Paid-up share capital, free Reserves and securities
premium account of the company. Provided that a private company may accept from
its members monies not exceeding one hundred per cent of aggregate of the paid up
share capital, free reserves and securities premium account and such company shall
file the details of monies so accepted to the Registrar in such manner as may be
specified.
Therefore, the given statement of eligibility of XYZ Private Ltd. to a ccept deposits
from its members to the extent of ` 60.00 lakh is True.
(ii) A Government company is not eligible to accept or renew deposits under section 76,
if the amount of such deposits together with the amount of other deposits outstanding
as on the date of acceptance or renewal exceeds thirty five per cent of the aggregate
of its Paid-up share capital, free Reserves and securities premium account of the
company.
Therefore, the given statement prescribing the limit of 25% to accept deposits is
False.
6. Section 83 of the Companies Act, 2013 empowers the Registrar to make entries with
respect to the satisfaction and release of charges even if no intimation has been received
by him from the company.
Accordingly, with respect to any registered charge if an evidence is shown to the
satisfaction of Registrar that the debt secured by charge has been paid or satisfied in whole
or in part or that the part of the property or undertaking charged has been released from
the charge or has ceased to form part of the company’s property or undertaking, then he
may enter in the register of charges a memorandum of satisfaction that:
the debt has been satisfied in whole or in part; or
the part of the property or undertaking has been released from the charge or has
ceased to form part of the company’s property or undertaking.
This power can be exercised by the Registrar despite the fact that no intimation has been
received by him from the company.
Information to affected parties: The Registrar shall inform the affected parties within 30
days of making the entry in the register of charges.
Issue of Certificate: As per Rule 8 (2), in case the Registrar enters a memorandum of
satisfaction of charge in full, he shall issue a certificate of registration of satisfaction of
charge in Form No. CHG-5.
7. According to section 101(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, a general meeting of a company
may be called by giving not less than clear twenty-one days' notice either in writing or
through electronic mode in such manner as may be prescribed.
Also, it is to be noted that 21 clear days mean that the date on which notice is served and
the date of meeting are excluded for sending the notice.
Further, Rule 35(6) of the Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014, provides that in case of
delivery by post, such service shall be deemed to have been effected in the case of a
notice of a meeting, at the expiration of forty eight hours after the letter containing the
same is posted.
Hence, in the given question:
(i) A 21 days’ clear notice must be given. In the given question, only 19 clear days’ notice
is served (after excluding 48 hours from the time of its posting and the day of sending
and date of meeting). Therefore, the meeting was not validly called.
(ii) As explained in (i) above, notice falls short by 2 days.
(iii) The Companies Act, 2013 does not provide anything specific regarding the
condonation of delay in giving of notice. Hence, the delay in giving the notice calling
the meeting cannot be condoned.
8. Discharge of Surety by Revocation: As per section 130 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
a specific guarantee cannot be revoked by the surety if the liability has already accrued. A
continuing guarantee may, at any time, be revoked by the surety, as to future transactions,
by notice to the creditor, but the surety remains liable for transactions already entered into.
As per the above provisions, liability of Sandeep is discharged with relation to all
subsequent credit supplies made by Sharma after revocation of guarantee, because it is a
case of continuing guarantee.
However, liability of Sandeep for previous transactions (before revocation) i.e. for
` 40,000 remains. He is liable for payment of ` 40,000 to Sharma because the transaction
was already entered into before revocation of guarantee.
9. It is the duty of bailee to return, or deliver according to the bailor’s directions, the goods
bailed without demand, as soon as the time for which they were bailed, has expired, or the
purpose for which they were bailed has been accomplished. [Section 160 of the Indian
Contract Act, 1872]
If, by the default of the bailee, the goods are not returned, delivered or tendered at the
proper time, he is responsible to the bailor for any loss, destruction or deterioration of the
goods from that time. [Section 161]
In the instant case, Manoj shall have to bear the loss since he failed to return the umbrella
within the stipulated time and Section 161 clearly says that where a bailee fails to retur n
the goods within the agreed time, he shall be responsible to the bailor for any loss,
destruction or deterioration of the goods from that time notwithstanding the exercise of
reasonable care on his part.
10. As per the facts stated in the question, Rahul (drawer) after having issued the cheque,
informs Aman (drawee) not to present the cheque for payment and as well as gave a stop
payment request to the bank in respect of the cheque issued to Aman.
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, is a penal provision in the sense that
once a cheque is drawn on an account maintained by the drawer with his banker for
payment of any amount of money to another person out of that account for the discharge
in whole or in part of any debt or liability, is informed by the bank unpaid either because of
insufficiency of funds to honour the cheques or the amount exceeding the arrangement
made with the bank, such a person shall be deemed to have committed an offence.
Once a cheque is issued by the drawer, a presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881 follows and merely because the drawer issues a notice thereafter to
the drawee or to the bank for stoppage of payment, it will not preclude an act ion under
Section 138.
Also, Section 140 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, specifies absolute liability of
the drawer of the cheque for commission of an offence under the section 138 of the Act.
Section 140 states that it shall not be a defence in a prosecution for an offence under
section 138 that the drawer had no reason to believe when he issued the cheque that the
cheque may be dishonoured on presentment for the reasons stated in that section.
Accordingly, the act of Rahul, i.e., his request of stop payment constitutes an offence under
the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
11. (1) According to section 5 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, where any Central Act has
not specifically mentioned a particular date to come into force, it shall be implemented
on the day on which it receives the assent of the President in case of an Act of
Parliament.
(2) If any specific date of enforcement is prescribed in the Official Gazette, the Act shall
come into enforcement from such date.
Thus, in the given question, the SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements)
(Fifth Amendment) Regulations, 2015 shall come into enforcement on 1 st January,
2016 rather than the date of its notification in the gazette.
12. Preamble: The Preamble expresses the scope, object and purpose of the Act more
comprehensively. The Preamble of a Statute is a part of the enactment and can legitimately
be used as an internal aid for construing it. However, the Preamble does not over-ride the
plain provision of the Act. But if the wording of the statute gives rise to doubts as to its
proper construction, for example, where the words or phrase has more than one meaning
and a doubt arises as to which of the two meanings is intended in the Act, the Pr eamble
can and ought to be referred to in order to arrive at the proper construction.
In short, the Preamble to an Act discloses the primary intention of the legislature but can
only be brought in as an aid to construction if the language of the statute is not clear.
However, it cannot override the provisions of the enactment.
Example: Use of the word ‘may’ in section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 provides that
“a marriage may be solemnized between two Hindus…..” has been construed to be
mandatory in the sense that both parties to the marriage must be Hindus as defined in
section 2 of the Act. It was held that a marriage between a Christian male and a Hindu
female solemnized under the Hindu Marriage Act was void. This result was reached also
having regard to the preamble of the Act which reads: ‘An Act to amend and codify the law
relating to marriage among Hindus” [Gullipoli Sowria Raj V. Bandaru Pavani, (2009)].
for efficient discharge of its functions under sub-section (2) [other than clause
(a)] and sub-section (4).”;
[Amendment to be incorporated on Pg 9.17 of SM]
(iii) in sub-section (4), in clause (c), for sub-clause (B), the following sub-clause shall
be substituted, namely:—
“(B) debarring the member or the firm from—
I. being appointed as an auditor or internal auditor or undertaking any audit
in respect of financial statements or internal audit of the functions and
activities of any company or body corporate; or
II. performing any valuation as provided under section 247,
for a minimum period of six months or such higher period not exceeding ten
years as may be determined by the National Financial Reporting Authority.”.
[Amendment to be incorporated on Pg 9.18 of SM]
(D) Amendments related to - Notification G.S.R. 636(E) 5 th September, 2019
The Central Government has amended the National Financial Reporting Authority
Rules, 2018, by the National Financial Reporting Authority (Amendment) Rules, 2019.
In the National Financial Reporting Authority Rules, 2018, after clause (c) of sub-rule
(1) of rule 3, the following explanation shall be inserted, namely:-
“Explanation.- For the purpose of this clause, “banking company” includes
‘corresponding new bank’ as defined in clause (d) of section 2 of the Banking
Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970) and
clause (b) of section 2 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of
Undertakings) Act, 1980 (40 of 1980) and ‘subsidiary bank’ as defined in clause (k)
of section 2 of the State Bank of India (Subsidiary Bank) Act, 1959 (38 of 1959).”.
[Enforcement Date: 5 th September, 2019]
[Amendment to be incorporated on Pg 9.19 of SM]
Extent, Commencement- It extends to the whole of India and it shall come into force on the
first day of September, 1872.
Saving- Nothing herein contained shall affect the provisions of any Statute, Act or Regulation
not hereby expressly repealed, nor any usage or custom of trade, nor any incident of any
contract, not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act.’
THE GENERAL CLAUSES ACT, 1897
Amendment via the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, dated 9 th August, 2019. The
amendment is effective with effect from 31 st October, 2019.
As per the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, the General Clauses Act, 1897 has
been extended as a whole.
# Here, SM means Study Material (i.e. Page number of the Study material in reference to
relevant provisions)
QUESTIONS
DIVISION A – CASE SCENARIO / MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS
1 A private company by the name of Neha Pvt. Limited was incorporated in the year 2002.
The registered office of the company Neha Pvt. Limited was situated in city K of state Y.
During the financial year beginning on 01/04/2018 and ending on 31/03/2019 the turnover
of the company Neha Pvt. Limited was ` 1010 crore. The net profit of the company Neha
Pvt. Limited for the financial year 2018-19 was ` 4 crore.
The Board of Directors of Neha Pvt. Limited consisted of only two directors namely Mr. M
and Mr. N. Mr. M and Mr. N were the only directors of company Neha Pvt. Limited since
its incorporation in the year 2002.
Mr. M one of the two directors of Neha Pvt. Limited was of the opinion that no Corporate
Social Responsibility Committee of the Board was required to be formed as for the financial
year 2019 – 20 due to the reason that net profit of the company Neha Pvt. Limited for
financial year 2018-19 was ` 4 crore which was less than ` 5 crore.
Mr. N the other director of Neha Pvt. Limited was not having the same opinion as
Mr. M. He was of the opinion that Corporate Social Responsibility Committee of the Board
must be formed for the company Neha Pvt. Limited.
The net profit of the company Neha Pvt. Limited for the financial year 2015-16, 2016-17
and 2017-18 were ` 1 crore, ` 2 crore and ` 3 crore respectively.
Keeping the basic provisions of Companies Act in mind answer the following multiple
choice questions:
(A) Mr. M one of the director of Neha Pvt. Limited was of the opinion that no Corporate
Social Responsibility Committee of Board was required to be formed for financial year
2019-20 but Mr. N other director was of opinion that it was required to be formed.
According to your understanding which one of the two director is right and why:
(a) Mr. M because net profit of Neha Pvt. Limited for financial year 2018-19 was
less than ` 5 crore.
(b) Mr. N because turnover of Neha Pvt. Limited for financial year 2018-19 was
more than ` 1,000 crore.
(c) Mr. N because net profit of Neha Pvt. Limited for financial year 2018-19 was
more than ` 2 crore.
(d) Mr. M because turnover of Neha Pvt. Limited for financial year 2019-19 was less
than ` 1,500 crore.
(B) The company Neha Pvt. Limited must give preference to spend the amount of
contribution towards Corporate Social Responsibility in area of:
(a) City O of State Y
(b) City A of State Z
(c) City G of State Z
(d) City K of State Y
(C) According to law Corporate Social Responsibility Committee shall consist of three or
more directors, so for company Neha Pvt. Limited the Corporate Social Responsibility
Committee will:
(a) Not be formed as it has only two directors namely Mr. M and Mr. N
(b) Be formed only after appointing one more director apart from Mr. M and Mr. N
(c) Be formed with two directors only namely Mr. M and Mr. N
(d) Be formed only after appointing two more directors apart from Mr. M and Mr. N
(D) The company Neha Pvt. Limited shall spend during financial year 2018-19 on
Corporate Social Responsibility an amount of atleast:
(a) ` 0.04 crore
(b) ` 0.12 crore
(c) ` 0.18 crore
(d) ` 0.06 crore
2. GHWX Private Limited was incorporated in the year 2009. The registered office of the company
GHWX Private Limited was situated in city T of state V. The Board of Directors of GHWX Private
Limited comprised of five directors namely Mr. K, Mr. N, Mr. R, Mr. U and Mr. W.
During the financial year beginning on 01/04/2018 and ending on 31/03/2019 the second
meeting of Board of Directors of GHWX Private Limited was held on 7 September, 2018.
Out of 5 directors, Mr. K, Mr. N, Mr. R and Mr. W were present for the said meeting. During
the meeting of Board of Directors a resolution on one of the important matters was passed.
While three directors namely Mr. K, Mr. N and Mr. R agreed with the resolution and voted
in favour of resolution, however, Mr. W did not agree with the resolution and voted against
the resolution.
The minutes of the second meeting of Board of Directors of GHWX Private Limited held on
7 September, 2018 were prepared and they were entered in Minutes Book of mee ting of
Board of Directors of GHWX Private Limited. One of the director Mr. K was of the opinion
that minutes of second meeting of Board of Directors of GHWX Private Limited must be
prepared and entered in Minute Book of meeting of Board of Directors of GH WX Private
Limited by end of October, 2018. The remaining four directors namely Mr. N, Mr. R, Mr. U
and Mr. W did not agree with the opinion of Mr. K because they thought that it was not
within the time limit as prescribed by the law.
One of the directors, Mr. N. opined that minute books of meetings of Board of Directors of
GHWX Private Limited for the years starting with 2009 to 2015 should be shredded to ruins
as these papers were taking a lot of space. He further added that since the Companies
Act, 2013 is silent as to maintaining the minute book of meetings of Board of Directors, it
is not necessary to maintain such minute books.
The Board of Directors of GHWX Private Limited did not decide any place where minute
book of meetings of Board of Directors of GHWX Private Limited will be kept.
Keeping the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, in mind answer the following multiple
choice questions:
(A) The second meeting of Board of Directors of GHWX Private Limited was held on 7
September, 2018 for the financial year 2018-19. The minutes of second meeting of
Board of Directors of GHWX Private Limited for financial year 2018-19 must contain:
(a) Name of director Mr. U who was absent from the meeting of Board of Directors
held on 7 September, 2018.
(b) Names of all the directors Mr. K, Mr. N, Mr. R, Mr. U and Mr. W comprising Board
of Directors of GHWX Private Limited.
(c) Name of one director Mr. U who was absent and atleast one director who was
present in the meeting of Board of Directors held on 7 September, 2018.
(d) Names of directors Mr. K, Mr. N, Mr. R and Mr. W who were present in the
meeting of Board of Directors held on 7 September, 2018.
(B) In case of the resolution talked in the case study, the minutes of second meeting of
Board of Directors of GHWX Private Limited for financial year 2018-19 held on 7
September, 2018 must contain:
(a) Name of any two directors who were present in meeting and voted in the
resolution.
(b) Name of director Mr. W who voted against the resolution.
(c) Name of directors Mr. K, Mr. N and Mr. R who voted in favour of the resolution.
(d) Names of all the directors Mr. K, Mr. N, Mr. R, Mr. U and Mr. W who all had the
right to attend the meeting and vote in the resolution.
(C) The opinion of one of the director, Mr. K was that minutes of second meeting of Board of
Directors of GHWX Private Limited for financial year 2018-19 must be prepared and
entered in minutes book of meeting of Board of Directors of GHWX Private Limited by the
end of October, 2018 is incorrect. The opinion of Mr. K is incorrect because:
(a) Minutes of second meeting of Board of Directors of GHWX Private Limited for
financial year 2018-19 must be entered in minute book of meeting of Board of
Directors within thirty days of the conclusion of meeting on 7 September, 2018.
(b) Minutes of second meeting of Board of Directors of GHWX Private Limited for
the financial year 2018-19 must be entered in minute book of meeting of Board
of Directors within sixty days of the conclusion of meeting on 7 September, 2018.
(c) Minutes of second meeting of Board of Directors of GHWX Private Limited for the
financial year 2018-19 must be entered in minute book of meeting of Board of
Directors within ninety days of the conclusion of meeting on 7 September, 2018.
(d) Minutes of second meeting of Board of Directors of GHWX Private Limited for
financial year 2018-19 must be entered in minute book of meeting of Board of
Directors within one twenty days of the conclusion of meeting on 7 September, 2018.
3. G Ltd. (a company having CSR Committee as per the provision of Section 13 5 of the
Companies Act, 2013) decides to spend and utilize half of the amount of Corporate Social
Responsibility on the activities for the benefit of all the employees of G Limited and the
remaining half of the amount of Corporate Social Responsibility on the activities for the
benefit of family members of employees of G Limited As per the provision of Companies
Act, 2013 this would mean that:-
(a) This is the total amount spent on Corporate Social Responsibility activities by G
Limited for that financial year
(b) No amount spent on Corporate Social Responsibility activities by G Limited for that
financial year
(c) Half amount spent on Corporate Social Responsibility activities by G Limited for that
financial year
(d) Half amount spent on Corporate Social Responsibility activities and remaining half
amount spent on Other Activities by G Limited for that financial year
4. The minute book of General meetings of Alpha Limited will be kept at:
(a) That place where members of Alpha Limited will decide.
(b) That place where all employees of Alpha Limited will decide.
(c) Registered office of the company Alpha Limited.
(d) That place where senior officials of Alpha Limited will decide.
5. R purchases some goods on credit from S, payable within 3 months. After 2 months, R
makes out a blank cheque in favour of S, signs and delivers it to S with a request to fill up
the amount due, as R does not know the exact amount payable by him. S fills up
fraudulently the amount larger than the amount payable by R and endorses the cheque to
C in full payment of S's own due. R's cheque is dishonoured. Referring to the provisions
of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, C:
(a) Can claim the full amount from R
(b) Can claim the full from S
(c) Cannot claim the amount either from R or S
(d) Can claim from S only the exact amount that was due from R to S
DIVISION B - DETAILED QUESTIONS
COMPANY LAW
The Companies Act, 2013
1. MNP Ltd. has a paid up share capital of ` 10 crore and free reserves of ` 50 crore, as on
31st March, 2019. The company made a loss of ` 40 lakh after providing for depreciation
for the year ended 31 st March, 2019 and as a result, the company was not in a position to
declare any dividend for the said year out of profits. However, the Board of directors of the
company announced the declaration of dividend of 20% on the equity shares payable out
of free reserves. The average dividend declared by the company in the last three years is
25%. Referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, examine the validity of
declaration of dividend.
2. New Limited appointed an individual firm, Naresh & Company, Chartered Accountants, a s
Auditors of the company at the Annual General Meeting held on 30 September 201 9.
Mrs. Reena, wife of Mr. Naresh, invested in the equity shares face value of ` 1 lakh of New
Limited on 15 October 2019. But Naresh & Company continues to function as statutory
auditors of the company. Advice, Naresh & Company on the continuation of such
appointment, as per provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
3. The Board of Directors of Vishwakarma Electronics Limited consists of Mr. Ghanshyam
(Director), Mr. Hyder (Director) and Mr. Indersen (Managing Director). The company has
also employed a full time Secretary.
The Profit and Loss Account and Balance Sheet of the company were signed by
Mr. Ghanshyam and Mr. Hyder. Examine whether the authentication of financial statements of
the company was in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013?
4. EFG Ltd. was incorporated on 1.4.2017. No General Meeting of the company has been
held till 30.4.2019. Discuss the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 regarding the time
limit for holding the first annual general meeting of the Company and the power of the
Registrar to grant extension of time for the First Annual General Meeting.
5. Green Ltd. was dealing in export of rubber to specified foreign countries. The company
was willing to purchase rubber trees in A.P. State. The prospectus issued by the company
contained some important extracts of the expert report and number of trees in A.P. St ate.
The report was found untrue. Mr. Andrew purchased the shares of Green Ltd. on the basis
of the expert’s report published in the prospectus. However, he did not suffer any loss due
to purchase of such shares. Will Mr. Andrew have any remedy against the company? State
also the circumstances where an expert is not liable under the Companies Act, 2013.
6. The Articles of Association of Ajad Ltd. require the personal presence of 7 members to
constitute quorum of General Meetings. The company has 965 members as on the date of
meeting. The following persons were present in the extra-ordinary meeting to consider the
appointment of Managing Director:
(i) A, the representative of Governor of Uttar Pradesh.
(ii) B and C, shareholders of preference shares,
(iii) D, representing Y Ltd. and Z Ltd.
(iv) E, F, G and H as proxies of shareholders.
Can it be said that the quorum was present in the meeting?
7. K Limited, a subsidiary of Old Limited, decides to give a loan of ` 4,00,000 to the Human
Resource Manager, who is not a Key Managerial Personnel of K Limited, drawing salary of
` 30,000 per month, to buy 500 partly paid-up equity Shares of ` 1000 each in K Limited.
Examine the validity of company's decision under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
8. Yadav Dairy Products Private limited has registered its articles along with memorandum at
the time of registration of company in December, 2014. Now directors of the company are
of the view that provisions of articles regarding forfeiture of shares should not be changed
except by a resolution of 90% majority. While as per section 14 of the Companies Act,
2013 articles may be changed by passing a special resolution only. Hence, one of the
directors is of the view that they cannot make a provision against the Companies Act, 2013.
You are required to advise the company on this matter.
OTHER LAWS
The Indian Contract Act, 1872
9. Pankaj appoints Shruti as his agent to sell his estate. Shruti, on looking over the estate
before selling it, finds the existence of a good quality Granite-Mine on the estate, which is
unknown to Pankaj. Shruti buys the estate herself after informing Pankaj that she (Shruti)
wishes to buy the estate for herself but conceals the existence of Granite-Mine. Pankaj
allows Shruti to buy the estate, in ignorance of the existence of Mine. State giving reasons
in brief the rights of Pankaj, the principal, against Shruti, the agent. Give your answer as
per the provisions of the Contract Act, 1872.
What would be your answer if Shruti had informed Pankaj about the existence of Mine
before she purchased the estate, but after two months, she sold the estate at a profit of
` 10 lac?
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
10. Discuss with reasons, whether the following persons can be called as a ‘holder’ under the
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881:
SUGGESTED ANSWERS/HINTS
As per facts of the question the present rate of dividend is 20% and average dividend
declared in the last three years is 25%. So, this condition is fulfilled.
(ii) The total amount to be drawn from free reserves shall not exceed one-tenth i.e., 10%
of its paid-up share capital and free reserves as per the latest audited financial
statement.
Amount of dividend proposed: ` 2 Crores (20% of ` 10 Crore i.e on paid up capital)
10% of paid up share capital and free reserves: 10% of (10 crore + 50 crore) = ` 6
Crore.
This condition is fulfilled as amount of dividend is not exceeding 10% of its paid -up
share capital and free reserves.
(iii) The amount so drawn shall first be utilized to set off the losses incurred in the financial
year in which dividend is declared and only thereafter, any dividend in respect of
equity shares shall be declared.
(iv) After such withdrawal from free reserves, the residual reserves shall not fall below
15% of its paid-up share capital as per the latest audited financial statement.
Balance of reserves after payment of dividend: ` 48 crore (50 crore – 2 crore)
15% of paid up share capital: 1.5 crore (15% of 10 crore)
This condition is fulfilled.
Taking into account all the conditions, it can be said that declaration of dividend by MN P
Limited is valid.
2. Disqualification of auditor: According to section 141(3)(d)(i) of the Companies Act, 2013,
a person who, or his relative or partner holds any security of the company or its subsidiary
or of its holding or associate company or a subsidiary of such holding company, which
carries voting rights, such person cannot be appointed as auditor of the company. Provided
that the relative of such person may hold security or interest in the company of face value
not exceeding 1 lakh rupees as prescribed under the Companies (Audit and Auditors)
Rules, 2014.
In the case Mr. Naresh, Chartered Accountants, did not hold any such security. But
Mrs. Reena, his wife held equity shares of New Limited of face value ` 1 lakh, which is
within the specified limit.
Further Section 141(4) provides that if an auditor becomes subject, after his appointment,
to any of the disqualifications specified in sub-section 3 of section 141, he shall be deemed
to have vacated his office of auditor. Hence, Naresh & Company can continue to function
as auditors of the Company even after 15 October 2019 i.e. after the investment made by
his wife in the equity shares of New Limited.
3. According to section 134(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, the financial statement, including
consolidated financial statement, if any, shall be approved by the Board of Directors before
they are signed on behalf of the Board by the chairperson of the company where he is
authorised by the Board or by two directors out of which one shall be managing director, if
any, and the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the company secretary
of the company, wherever they are appointed, or in the case of One Person Company, only
by one director, for submission to the auditor for his report thereon.
In the instant case, the Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss Account have been signed by
Mr. Ghanshyam and Mr. Hyder, the directors. In view of Section 134(1) of the Companies
Act, 2013, Mr. Indersen, the Managing Director should be one of the two signing directors.
Since, the company has also employed a full- time Secretary, he should also sign the
Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss Account.
4. According to Section 96 of the Companies Act, 2013, every company shall be required to
hold its first annual general meeting within a period of 9 months from the date of closing of
its first financial year.
The first financial year of EFG Ltd is for the period 1st April 2017 to 31st March 2018, the
first annual general meeting (AGM) of the company should be held on or before
31st December, 2018.
The section further provides that the Registrar may, for any special reason, extend the
time within which any annual general meeting, other than the first annual general meeting,
shall be held, by a period not exceeding three months.
Thus, the first AGM of EFG Ltd. should have been held on or before 31 st December, 2018.
Further, the Registrar does not have the power to grant extension to time limit for the first
AGM.
5. Under section 35 (1) of the Companies Act 2013, where a person has subscribed for
securities of a company acting on any statement included in the prospectus which is
misleading and has sustained any loss or damage as a consequence thereof, the company
and every person including an expert shall, be liable to pay compensation to the person
who has sustained such loss or damage.
In the present case, Mr. Andrew purchased the shares of Green Ltd. on the basis of the
expert report published in the prospectus. Mr. Andrew can claim compensation for any loss
or damage that he might have sustained from the purchase of shares. However, he did not
suffer any loss due to purchase of such shares.
Hence, Mr. Andrew will have no remedy against the company.
Circumstances when an expert is not liable: An expert will not be liable for any mis-
statements in the prospectus under the following situations:
(i) Under section 26 (5), that having given his consent, but withdrew it in writing before
delivery of the copy of prospectus for filing, or
(ii) Under section 35 (2), that the prospectus was issued without his knowledge / consent
and that on becoming aware of it, he forthwith gave a reasonable public notice that it
was issued without his knowledge or consent;
(iii) An expert will not be liable in respect of any statement not made by him in the capacity
of an expert and included in the prospectus as such;
(iv) that, as regards every misleading statement purported to be made by an expert or
contained in what purports to be a copy of or an extract from a report or valuation of
an expert, it was a correct and fair representation of the statement, or a correct copy
of, or a correct and fair extract from, the report or valuation; and he had reasonable
ground to believe and did up to the time of the issue of the prospectus believe, that
the person making the statement was competent to make it and that the said person
had given the consent required by section 26(5) to the issue of the prospectus and
had not withdrawn that consent before filing of a copy of the prospectus with the
Registrar or, to the defendant's knowledge, before allotment thereunder.
6. According to section 103 of the Companies Act, 2013, unless the articles of the company
provide for a larger number in case of a public company, five members personally present
if the number of members as on the date of meeting is not more than one thousand, shall
be the quorum.
In this case the quorum for holding a general meeting is 7 members to be personally
present (higher of 5 or 7). For the purpose of quorum, only those members are counted
who are entitled to vote on resolution proposed to be passed in the meeting.
Again, only members present in person and not by proxy are to be counted. Hence, proxies
whether they are members or not will have to be excluded for the purposes of quorum.
If a company is a member of another company, it may authorize a person by resolution to
act as its representative at a meeting of the latter company, then such a person shall be
deemed to be a member present in person and counted for the purpose of quorum Where
two or more companies which are members of another company, appoint a single person
as their representative then each such company will be counted as quorum at a meeting
of the latter company.
Further the President of India or Governor of a State, if he is a member of a company, may
appoint such a person as he thinks fit, to act as his representative at any meeting of the
company. A person so appointed shall be deemed to be a member of such a company and
thus considered as member personally present.
In view of the above there are only three members personally present.
‘A’ will be included for the purpose of quorum. B & C have to be excluded for the purpose
of quorum because they represent the preference shares and since the agenda being the
appointment of Managing Director, their rights cannot be said to be directly affected and
therefore, they shall not have voting rights. D will have two votes for the purpose of quorum
as he represents two companies ‘Y Ltd.’ and ‘Z Ltd.’ E, F, G and H are not to be included
as they are not members but representing as proxies for the members.
Thus, it can be said that the requirements of quorum has not been met and it shall not
constitute a valid quorum for the meeting.
7. Restrictions on purchase by company or giving of loans by it for purchase of its
share: As per section 67 (3) of the Companies Act, 2013 a company is allowed to give a
loan to its employees subject to the following limitations:
(a) The employee must not be a Key Managerial Personnel;
(b) The amount of such loan shall not exceed an amount equal to six months’ salary of
the employee.
10. Person to be called as a holder: As per section 8 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
‘holder’ of a Negotiable Instrument means any person entitled in his own name to the
possession of it and to receive or recover the amount due thereon from the parties thereto.
On applying the above provision in the given cases—
(i) Yes, X can be termed as a holder because he has a right to possession and to receive
the amount due in his own name.
(ii) No, he is not a ‘holder’ because to be called as a ‘holder’ he must be entitled not only
to the possession of the instrument but also to receive the amount mentioned therein.
(iii) No, M is not a holder of the Instrument though he is in possession of the cheque, so
is not entitled to the possession of it in his own name.
(iv) No, B is not a holder. While the agent may receive payment of the amount mentioned
in the cheque, yet he cannot be called the holder thereof because he has no right to
sue on the instrument in his own name.
(v) No, B is not a holder because he is in wrongful possession of the instrument.
11. According to section 27 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, where any legislation or
regulation requires any document to be served by post, then unless a different intention
appears, the service shall be deemed to be effected by:
(i) Properly addressing
(ii) Pre-paying, and
(iii) Posting by registered post.
A letter containing the document to have been effected at the time at which the letter would
be delivered in the ordinary course of post.
The facts of the question are similar to a decided case law, wherein it was held that where
a notice is sent to the landlord by registered post and the same is returned by the tenant
with an endorsement of refusal, it will be presumed that the notice has been served. Thus,
in the given question it can be deemed that the notice was rightfully served on Mr. Vyas.
12. Proviso: The normal function of a proviso is to except something out of the enactment or
to qualify something stated in the enactment which would be within its purview if the proviso
were not there. The effect of the proviso is to qualify the preceding enactment which is
expressed in terms which are too general. As a general rule, a proviso is added to an
enactment to qualify or create an exception to what is in the enactment. Ordinarily a proviso
is not interpreted as stating a general rule.
It is a cardinal rule of interpretation that a proviso to a particular provision of a statute only
embraces the field which is covered by the main provision. It carves out an exception to
the main provision to which it has been enacted as a proviso and to no other. (Ram Narain
Sons Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, AIR 1955 SC 765).
(C) which fulfils all of the following conditions, Section 73 shall not
namely:- apply to private
(a) which is not an associate or a subsidiary Companies which
company of any other company; accepts from its
(b) if the borrowings of such a company from members monies not
banks or financial institutions or any body exceeding one
corporate is less than twice of its paid up share hundred per cent, of
capital or fifty crore rupees, whichever is lower; aggregate of the paid
and up share capital and
free reserves, and
(c) such a company has not defaulted in the
such company shall
repayment of such borrowings subsisting at the
file the details of
time of accepting deposits under this section:
monies so accepted
Provided that the company referred to in clauses to the Registrar in
(A), (B) or (C) shall file the details of monies such manner as may
accepted to the Registrar in such manner as may be specified.
be specified.
(3) In Chapter VII, clause (g) of sub-section (1) of 7.11 clause (g) of sub-
section 92, shall apply to private companies which section (1) of section
are small companies, namely:- 92 is read as
“(g) aggregate amount of remuneration drawn by “remuneration of
directors;” directors and key
managerial
personnel”
(4) In Chapter VII, proviso to sub-section (1) of 7.12 (4) However, in
section 92, relation to One
For the proviso, the following proviso shall be Person Company
substituted, namely:- and small company,
“Provided that in relation to One Person Company, the annual return
small company and private company (if such shall be signed by the
private company is a start-up), the annual return company secretary,
shall be signed by the company secretary, or or where there is no
where there is no company secretary, by the company secretary,
director of the company.”. by the director of the
company.
(5) Section 143(3)(i), shall not apply to a private 10.24 (5) Section 143(3)(i)
company:- provides- whether
(i) which is a one person company or a small the company has
company; or adequate internal
(ii) which has turnover less than rupees fifty crores financial controls
as per latest audited financial statement or# system in place and
which has aggregate borrowings from banks or the operating
Accountants Act,
1959.
(ii) in clause (30), the following proviso shall be 1.8 –
inserted, namely: (The proviso is newly
"Provided that- inserted)
(a) the instruments referred to in Chapter III-D
of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934; and
(b) such other instrument, as may be prescribed
by the Central Government in consultation with the
Reserve Bank of India, issued by a company,
shall not be treated as debenture;";
1(iii) in clause (41), in the first proviso, after the
1.9 -
word "subsidiary", the words "or associate (The words are newly
company" shall be inserted; inserted)
which is a holding
company or a
subsidiary of a
company
incorporated outside
India
(iv) in clause (46), the following Explanation shall 1.11 -
be inserted, namely:- (The Explanation is
'Explanation.—For the purposes of this clause, the newly inserted)
expression "company" includes any body
corporate;';
(v) clause (49) shall be omitted 1.11 (49) Interested
director means a
director who is in
any way, whether
by…………, entered
into or to be entered
into by or on behalf
of a company;
This definition is
relevant for section
174 relating to
quorum …….. 188
1First proviso to section 2(41) has been fully substituted by the Companies (Amendment) Second Ordinance,
2019 (with retrospective effect from 2 nd November, 2018).
relating to related
party transactions
of the Companies
Act, 2013.
(vi) in clause (51),- 1.11 (iii) the whole-time
director;
(a) in sub-clause (iv), the word "and" shall be (iv) the Chief
omitted; Financial Officer;
(b) for sub-clause (v), the following sub-clauses and
shall be substituted, namely:- (v) such other
"(v) such other officer, not more than one level officer as may be
below the directors who is in whole-time prescribed;
employment, designated as key managerial
personnel by the Board; and
(vi) such other officer as may be prescribed;"
(vii) in clause (57), for the words "and securities 1.12 ……the aggregate
premium account", the words ", securities value of the paid-up
premium account and debit or credit balance of share capital and all
profit and loss account," shall be substituted reserves created out
of the profits and
securities premium
account, after
deducting the
aggregate…..
(viii) in clause (71), in sub-clause (a), after the 1.15 –
word "company;", the word "and" shall be inserted; (The word is newly
inserted)
(ix) in clause (72), in the proviso, in clause (A), 1.16 -
after the words “State Act”, the words “other than (The words are newly
this Act or the previous company law” shall be inserted)
inserted;
(x) in clause (76), for sub-clause (viii), the 1.17 (viii) any company
following sub-clause shall be substituted, which is—
namely:— (A) a holding,
subsidiary or an
"(viii) any body corporate which is— associate company
(A) a holding, subsidiary or an associate company of such company;
of such company; or
(B) a subsidiary of a holding company to which it (B) a subsidiary of a
is also a subsidiary; or holding company to
(b) Secondly,
under the Financial
informations, …….
applied directly or
indirectly;
(d) state such
other matters and
set out such other
reports, as may be
prescribed.
8. In section 35 of the principal Act, in sub-section 3.22 -
(2), after clause (b), the following clause shall be (The clause is newly
inserted, namely:- inserted)
22. In section 92 of the principal Act,— 7.12 the said words have
been substituted
2(ii) in sub-section (5), for the words and figures, (however, the study
"under section 403 with additional fees" the word material does not
"therein" shall be substituted. contain reference of
section 403)
Enforcement Date: 7 th May, 2018
23. Section 93 of the principal Act shall be 7.13 SECTION 93 –
omitted. RETURN …..
company in each
Enforcement Date: 13th June, 2018 case
24. In section 94 of the principal Act,— 7.14 the change has to be
(i) in sub-section (1), in the first proviso, the words made in the diagram
"and the Registrar has been given a copy of the given on page 7.14
proposed special resolution in advance" shall be
omitted;
Enforcement Date: 13 th June, 2018
24. In section 94 of the principal Act,— 7.14 -
(The proviso is newly
(ii) in sub-section (3), the following proviso shall inserted)
be inserted, namely:—
"Provided that such particulars of the register or
index or return as may be prescribed shall not be
available for inspection under sub-section (2) or
for taking extracts or copies under this sub-
section.".
Enforcement Date: 13th June, 2018
25. In section 96 of the principal Act, in sub- 7.51 -
section (2), in the proviso, for the words "Provided (The proviso is newly
that", the following shall be substituted, namely:— inserted)
"Provided that annual general meeting of an
unlisted company may be held at any place in
India if consent is given in writing or by electronic
mode by all the members in advance:
Provided further that".
Enforcement Date: 13th June, 2018
2Sub-section 5 of section 92 has been fully substituted by the Companies (Amendment) Second Ordinance,
2019 (w.r.e.f. 2.11.2018)
necessity to call
and hold such
meeting.
28. In section 110 of the principal Act, in sub- 7.34 -
section (1), the following proviso shall be inserted, (The proviso is newly
namely:- inserted)
"Provided that any item of business required to be
transacted by means of postal ballot under clause
(a), may be transacted at a general meeting by a
company which is required to provide the facility
to members to vote by electronic means under
section 108, in the manner provided in that
section."
Enforcement Date: 9 th February, 2018
29. In section 117 of the principal Act,— 7.45 the said words have
(i) in sub-section (1), the words and figures “within been omitted
the time specified under section 403” shall be (however, the study
omitted; material does not
Enforcement Date: 7 th May, 2018 contain reference of
section 403)
29. In section 117 of the principal Act,— 7.46 Section 117(2) sets
out …….. to …... the
3(ii) in sub-section (2),— specified time under
(a) for the words and figures “under section 403 section 403 and
……. which shall not
with additional fees”, the word “therein” shall be
be less than
substituted;
` 5,00,000 but which
(b) for the words "not be less than five lakh may extend to
rupees", the words "not be less than one lakh ` 25,00,000 and
rupees" shall be substituted; every officer ……
(c) for the words "one lakh rupees", the words "fifty with fine which shall
thousand rupees" shall be substituted; not be less than
` 1,00,000 but which
Enforcement Date: 7 th May, 2018 may extend to
` 5,00,000
3 Sub-section 2 of section 117 has been fully substituted by the Companies (Amendment) Second
Ordinance, 2019 (w.r.e.f. 2.11.2018)
4Sub-section 3 of section 121 has been fully substituted by the Companies (Amendment) Second Ordinance,
2019 (w.r.e.f. 2.11.2018)
declared by the
company during
immediately
preceding three
financial years.
32. In section 129 of the principal Act, for sub- 9.8 (1) Where a
section (3), the following sub-section shall be and company has one
substituted, namely:— 9.9 or more
"(3) Where a company has one or more subsidiaries, ……
subsidiaries or associate companies, it shall, in Rule 6 of
addition to financial statements provided under the Companies
sub-section (2), prepare a consolidated financial (Accounts) Rules,
statement of the company and of all the 2014.
subsidiaries and associate companies in the same
form and manner as that of its own and in Explanation—For
accordance with applicable accounting standards,
the purposes of this
which shall also be laid before the annual general
sub-section, the
meeting of the company along with the laying of its
word “subsidiary”
financial statement under sub-section (2):
shall include
Provided that the company shall also attach along
associate company
with its financial statement, a separate statement
and joint venture.
containing the salient features of the financial
statement of its subsidiary or subsidiaries and
associate company or companies in such form as
may be prescribed:
Provided further that the Central Government may
provide for the consolidation of accounts of
companies in such manner as may be prescribed.
Enforcement Date: 7th May, 2018
33. In section 130 of the principal Act,- 9.13 For (i) -
(i) in sub-section (1), in the proviso,- (The words are newly
(a) after the words "regulatory body or authorities inserted)
concerned", the words "or any other person
concerned" shall be inserted;
(b) after the words "the body or authority
concerned", the words "or the other person
concerned" shall be inserted;
Enforcement Date: 9 th February, 2018
33. In section 130 of the principal Act,- 9.13
(ii) after sub-section (2), the following sub-section For (ii) –
shall be inserted, namely:-
"(3) No order shall be made under sub-section (1) (This sub- section is
in respect of re-opening of books of account newly inserted)
relating to a period earlier than eight financial
years immediately preceding the current financial
year: Provided that where a direction has been
issued by the Central Government under the
proviso to sub-section (5) of section 128 for
keeping of books of account for a period longer
than eight years, the books of account may be
ordered to be re-opened within such longer
period."
Enforcement Date: 9 th February, 2018
34. In section 134 of the principal Act,— 9.16
(a) for sub-section (1), the following sub-section The financial
shall be substituted, namely:— statements,
including
"(1) The financial statement, including
consolidated
consolidated financial statement, if any, shall be
financial statement,
approved by the Board of Directors before they are
…......... for
signed on behalf of the Board by the chairperson
submission to the
of the company where he is authorised by the
auditor for his
Board or by two directors out of which one shall be
report thereon.
managing director, if any, and the Chief Executive
Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the
company secretary of the company, wherever they
are appointed, or in the case of One Person
Company, only by one director, for submission to
the auditor for his report thereon.";
Enforcement Date: 31 st July, 2018
34. In section 134 of the principal Act,— 9.17 For (i)
(b) in sub-section (3),— Extract of annual
return (in the
(i) for clause (a), the following clause shall be
diagram)
substituted, namely:—
"(a) the web address, if any, where annual return
referred to in sub-section (3) of section 92 has For (ii)
been placed;"; Listed /other public
(ii) in clause (p), for the words "annual evaluation …….
has been made by the Board of its own statement
performance and that of its committees and of annual evaluation
individual directors", the words "annual evaluation of performances of
of the performance of the Board, its Committees Board,
5Sub-section 3 of section 140 has been fully substituted by the Companies (Amendment) Second Ordinance,
2019 (w.r.e.f. 2.11.2018)
provided in section
144
41. In section 143 of the principal Act,- 10.23 (c) Access to record
(i) in sub-section (1), in the proviso, for the words of all its subsidiaries:
"its subsidiaries", at both the places, the words "its The auditor of a …….
subsidiaries and associate companies" shall be the records of all its
substituted; subsidiaries in so
far as it relates to the
consolidation of its
Enforcement Date: 9 th February, 2018
financial statements
with that of its
subsidiaries.
41. In section 143 of the principal Act,- 10.24 (9) whether the
(ii) in sub-section (3), in clause (i), for the words company has
"internal financial controls system", the words adequate internal
"internal financial controls with reference to financial controls
financial statements" shall be substituted; system in place and
Enforcement Date: 9 th February, 2018 the operating
effectiveness of such
controls;
41. In section 143 of the principal Act,- 10.36 The provisions of
(iii) in sub-section (14), in clause (a), for the words section 143 shall
"cost accountant in practice", the words "cost mutatis mutandis
accountant" shall be substituted apply to the cost
accountant in
practice conducting
Enforcement Date: 9 th February, 2018
cost audit under
section 148.
42. In section 147 of the principal Act,- 10.33 -
(i) in sub-section (2),- The words shall be
(a) after the words "five lakh rupees", the words inserted in point (iii)
"or four times the remuneration of the auditor, (a)
whichever is less" shall be inserted;
Enforcement Date: 9 th February, 2018
42. In section 147 of the principal Act,- 10.33and
(i) in sub-section (2),-
(b) in the proviso, for the words "and with fine (2) Fine which shall
which shall not be less than one lakh rupees but not be less than ` 1
which may extend to twenty-five lakh rupees", the lac but which may
words "and with fine which shall not be less than extend to ` 25 Lacs
fifty thousand rupees but which may extend to
Works Accountants
Act, 1959, with the
approval of the
Central Government.
43. In section 148 of the principal Act,- 10.35 (x) The report on
(ii) in sub-section (5), in the proviso, for the words the audit of cost
"cost accountant in practice", the words "cost records shall be
accountant" shall be substituted submitted by the
Enforcement Date: 9 th February, 2018 cost accountant in
practice to the Board
of Directors (BoD) of
the company.
44. In section 447 of the principal Act,- 3.25 The words are newly
(a) after the words "guilty of fraud", the words inserted
"involving an amount of at least ten lakh rupees or
one per cent. of the turnover of the company,
whichever is lower" shall be inserted.
Enforcement Date: 9 th February, 2018
44. In section 447 of the principal Act,- 3.26 In earlier law the
(b) after the proviso, the following proviso shall be proviso was not
inserted, namely:— "Provided further that where there. The proviso is
the fraud involves an amount less than ten lakh newly inserted
rupees or one per cent. of the turnover of the
company, whichever is lower, and does not
involve public interest, any person guilty of such
fraud shall be punishable with imprisonment for a
term which may extend to five years or with fine
which may extend to 6twenty lakh rupees or with
both.”
Enforcement Date: 9 th February, 2018
XI Amendments related to - Amendment in the 9.7 Replace the footnote
notification number G.S.R. 463(E) dated the 5th ‘Section 129 shall not
June, 2015 vide Notification no. S.O. 802(E) dated apply to the
23rd February, 2018 Government
In exercise of the powers conferred by clauses (a) companies to the
and (b) of sub-section (1) and subsection (2) of extent of
6 The amount of “twenty lakh rupees” has been replaced with “fifty lakh rupees” as per the Companies
(Amendment) Second Ordinance, 2019.
2019. [It shall be deemed to have come into force associate company
on 2nd November, 2018.] of a company
1. In clause (41) of section 2, incorporated
(a) for the first proviso, the following provisos shall outside India and is
be substituted namely: required to follow a
different financial
“Provided that where a company or body
year for
corporate, which is a holding company or a
consolidation of its
subsidiary or associate company of a company
accounts outside
incorporated outside India and is required to follow
India, the Tribunal
a different financial year for consolidation of its
may, if it is
accounts outside India, the Central Government
satisfied, allow any
may, on an application made by that company or
period as its
body corporate in such form and manner as may
financial year,
be prescribed, allow any period as its financial
whether or not that
year, whether or not that period is a year:
period is a year:
Provided further that any application pending
before the Tribunal as on the date of
commencement of the Companies (Amendment)
Ordinance, 2019, shall be disposed of by the
Tribunal in accordance with the provisions
applicable to it before such commencement.”
(b) for the second proviso, the for the words
“Provided further that”, the words “Provided also
that” shall be substituted.
2. After section 10, the following section shall be - The section is newly
inserted, namely: inserted
“10A.Commencement of business etc.
(1) A company incorporated after the
commencement of the Companies (Amendment)
Ordinance, 2019 and having a share capital shall
not commence any business or exercise any
borrowing powers unless—
(a) a declaration is filed by a director within a
period of one hundred and eighty days of the date
of incorporation of the company in such form and
verified in such manner as may be prescribed, with
the Registrar that every subscriber to the
memorandum has paid the value of the shares
agreed to be taken by him on the date of making
of such declaration; and
Provided also that any application pending before the Tribunal which
the Tribunal, as on the date of commencement of shall make such
the Companies (Amendment) Ordinance, 2019, order as it may
shall be disposed of by the Tribunal in accordance deem fit.
with the provisions applicable to it before such
commencement.”
4. In section 14, 2.31 Every alteration of
(ii) in sub- section (2), for the word “Tribunal”, the the articles and a
words “Central Government” shall be substituted. copy of the order of
the Tribunal
approving the
alteration, shall be
filed with the
Registrar, together
with a printed copy of
the altered articles,
within a period of
fifteen days in such
manner as may be
prescribed, who shall
register the same.
5. In section 53, for sub – section (3), the 4.10 Where a company
following sub- section shall be substituted, contravenes the
namely: provisions of this
“(3) Where any company fails to comply with the section, the
provisions of this section, such company and company shall be
every officer who is in default shall be liable to a punishable with
penalty which may extend to an amount equal to fine which shall not
the amount raised through the issue of shares at be less than one
a discount or five lakh rupees, whichever is less, lakh rupees but
and the company shall also be liable to refund all which may extend
monies received with interest at the rate of twelve to five lakh rupees
per cent. per annum from the date of issue of such and every officer
shares to the persons to whom such shares have who is in default
been issued.” shall be punishable
with imprisonment
for a term which
may extend to six
months or with fine
which shall not be
less than one lakh
rupees but which
may extend to five
7Section 90 (Investigation of Beneficial Ownership of Shares in Certain cases) has been replaced with section
90 (Register of Significant Beneficial Owners in a Company) via Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 [w.e.f.
13th June, 2018].
8 Same as footnote 7
may extend to
` 5,00,000 or
imprisonment up to
6 months or with
both.
12. In section 102, for sub- section (5), the 7.22 If any default is
following sub- section shall be substituted, made in complying
namely: with the provisions
“(5) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub- of this section, then
section (4), if any default is made in complying every promoter,
with the provisions of this section, every promoter, director, manager,
director, manager or other key managerial or other key
personnel of the company who is in default shall managerial
be liable to a penalty of fifty thousand rupees or personnel who is in
five times the amount of benefit accruing to the default shall be
promoter, director, manager or other key punishable with
managerial personnel or any of his relatives, fine which may
whichever is higher.” extend to ` 50,000
or 5 times the
amount of benefit
accruing to the
promoter, director,
manager or other
key managerial
personnel or any of
his relatives,
whichever is more.
13. In section 105, in sub- section (3), for the 7.25 Failure to state in
words “punishable with fine which may extend to notice of meeting that
five thousand rupees”, the words “liable to a a member is entitled
penalty of five thousand rupees” shall be to appoint proxy who
substituted. need not be a
member every officer
of the company who
is in default shall be
punishable with
fine which may
extend to ` 5,000.
14. In section 117, for sub- section (2), the 7.46 Section 117(2) sets
following sub- section shall be substituted, out the penalty in
namely: case of failure to
intimate RoC about
“(2) If any company fails to file the resolution or the resolutions and
the agreement under sub-section (1) before the agreements that are
expiry of the period specified therein, such required to be filed
company shall be liable to a penalty of one lakh within the specified
rupees and in case of continuing failure, with time under section
further penalty of five hundred rupees for each day 403 and states that
after the first during which such failure continues, the company shall
subject to a maximum of twenty-five lakh rupees be punishable with
and every officer of the company who is in default fine which shall not
including liquidator of the company, if any, shall be be less than
liable to a penalty of fifty thousand rupees and in ` 5,00,000 but
case of continuing failure, with further penalty of which may extend
five hundred rupees for each day after the first to ` 25,00,000 and
during which such failure continues, subject to a every officer of the
maximum of five lakh rupees.” company who is in
default, including
the liquidator, if
any, shall be
punishable with
fine which shall not
be less than
` 1,00,000 but
which may extend
to ` 5,00,000.
15. In section 121, for sub- section (3), the 7.52 if it fails to file such
following sub- section shall be substituted, report then
namely: company shall be
“(3) If the company fails to file the report under punishable with
sub-section (2) before the expiry of the period fine which shall not
specified therein, such company shall be liable to be less than
a penalty of one lakh rupees and in case of `1,00,000 but which
continuing failure, with further penalty of five may extend to
hundred rupees for each day after the first during `5,00,000 and every
which such failure continues, subject to a officer of the
maximum of five lakh rupees and every officer of company, who is in
the company who is in default shall be liable to a default, shall be
penalty which shall not be less than twenty-five punishable with
thousand rupees and in case of continuing failure, fine which shall not
with further penalty of five hundred rupees for be less than
each day after the first during which such failure `25,000 but which
continues, subject to a maximum of one lakh may extend to
rupees.” `1,00,000.
16. In section 137, in sub- section (3), 9.35 The company shall
(a) for the words “punishable with fine”, the words be punishable with
“liable to a penalty” shall be substitute; fine of `1,000 for
every day during
which the failure
continues
16. In section 137, in sub- section (3), 9.35 any such director, all
(b) for the portion beginning with “punishable with the directors of the
imprisonment”, and ending with “five lakh rupees company, shall be
or with both”, the words “shall be liable to a penalty punishable with:
of one lakh rupees and in case of continuing (1) Imprisonment
failure, with a further penalty of one hundred for a term which
rupees for each day after the first during which may extend to 6
such failure continues, subject to a maximum of months or
five lakh rupees” shall be substituted. (2) Fine which shall
not be less than ` 1
lac but which may
extend to `5 Lacs,
or
(3) Both with
imprisonment and
fine.
17. In section 140, for the sub- section (3), the 10.15 If the auditor does
following sub- section shall be substitute, namely: not comply with
9“(3) If the auditor does not comply with the aforesaid provision,
provisions of sub-section (2), he or it shall be liable he or it shall be
to a penalty of fifty thousand rupees or an amount punishable with
equal to the remuneration of the auditor, fine which shall not
whichever is less, and in case of continuing failure, be less than
with further penalty of five hundred rupees for ` 50,000 but which
each day after the first during which such failure may extend to ` 5
continues, subject to a maximum of five lakh Lacs.
rupees.”
18. In section 447, in the second proviso, for the 3.26 The amount of
words “twenty lakh rupees”, the words “fifty lakh “twenty lakh rupees”
rupees” shall be substituted. has been replaced
with “fifty lakh
rupees” as per the
9Sub-section 3 of section 140 has been fully substituted by the Companies (Amendment) Ordinance, 2019
w.r.e.f. 2.11.2018.
Companies
(Amendment)
Second Ordinance,
2019
XXIII Amendments related to - Notification G.S.R. 2.41 -
1219(E) dated 18th December, 2018 The Rule is newly
The Central Government has amended the inserted
Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014, by the
Companies (Incorporation) Fourth Amendment
Rules, 2018. It shall come into force on 18 th
December, 2018.
In the Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014
(hereinafter referred to as the said rules), after rule
23, the following rule shall be inserted, namely:-
“23A. Declaration at the time of commencement of
business.-The declaration under section 10A by a
director shall be in Form No.INC-20A and shall be
filed as provided in the Companies (Registration
Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014 and the contents of
the said form shall be verified by a Company
Secretary or a Chartered Accountant or a Cost
Accountant, in practice:
Provided that in the case of a company pursuing
objects requiring registration or approval from any
sectoral regulators such as the Reserve Bank of
India, Securities and Exchange Board of India,
etc., the registration or approval, as the case may
be from such regulator shall also be obtained and
attached with the declaration.”.
XXIV Amendments related to - Notification G.S.R. 1.5.4
42(E) dated 22nd January, 2019 2.
The Central Government has amended the 5.11
Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 3.
2014, by the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) 5.11
Amendment Rules, 2019. It shall come into force
on 22nd January, 2019.
In the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules,
2014 (hereinafter referred to as the said rules):
1. In rule 2, in sub-rule (1), in clause (c), in sub-
clause(xviii), after the words “Infrastructure
QUESTIONS
concerned Registrar of Companies (ROC) when the mortgage is registered with the Central
Registry?
(a) It is not necessary either for the bank or the company to register the charge on plot
of land with the concerned Registrar of Companies (ROC) when the mortgage is
registered with the Central Registry.
(b) It is necessary to get the charge on plot on land registered with the concerned
Registrar of Companies (ROC) irrespective of the fact that mortgage is registered
with the Central Registry.
(c) The charge on plot needs to be registered with the concerned Registrar of Companies
(ROC) only when the actual liability of the company with the Bank exceeds ` 1.00
crore.
(d) The charge on plot needs to be registered with the concerned Registrar of Companies
(ROC) only when the term loan sanctioned by the bank to the company exceeds `
2.00 crores.
2. With a view to augment its production, Surya Techno-Products Limited availed a loan of `
50.00 lacs from Shrilaxmi First Bank Limited for purchase of a new machinery by offering
its factory worth ` 2.25 crores as security. However, the company did not initiate any steps
to get the charge on factory registered in favour of lending banker within the specified time.
As soon as the charge-holder bank came to know about the non-registration of charge with
the ROC, it applied to the Registrar for registration of charge along with the instrument
creating the charge and paid the requisite fees when demanded. Advise the bank whether
it can recover the fees so paid for registration of charge from Surya Techno-Products.
(a) Yes, the bank can recover the fees paid by it for registration of charge.
(b) No, the bank cannot recover the fees paid by it for registration of charge because the
bank is equally responsible for getting the charge registered.
(c) Only when it obtains recovery orders from Regional Director (RD), the bank can
recover the fees paid by it for registration of charge from the company.
(d) Only when it obtains recovery orders from National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT),
the bank can recover the fees paid by it for registration of charge from the company.
3. A charge was created by Cygnus Softwares Limited on its office premises to secure a term
loan of ` 1.00 crore availed from Next_Gen Commercial Bank Limited through an
instrument of charge executed by both the parties on 16 th February, 2019. Inadvertently,
the company could not get the charge registered with the concerned Registrar of
Companies (ROC) within the first statutory period permitted by law and the default was
made known to it by the lending banker with a stern warning to take immediate steps for
rectification. Advise the company regarding the latest date within which it must register the
charge with the ROC so that it is not required to pay a specific type of fees for charge
registration.
(a) With a view to avoid paying a specific type of fees for charge registration, the
company must get the charge registered latest by 27 th April, 2019.
(b) With a view to avoid paying a specific type of fees for charge registration, the
company must get the charge registered latest by 17 th April, 2019.
(c) With a view to avoid paying a specific type of fees for charge registration, the
company must get the charge registered latest by 2 nd May, 2019.
(d) The company cannot now get the charge register as the time prescribed by Law has
expired.
4. Cyplish Games and Toys Limited was sanctioned a term loan of ` 60.00 lacs by Zawnn
Industrial Bank Limited on 21 st November, 2018. As a security, the company offered its
office premises situated at Bandra, Mumbai and an instrument of charge was executed.
However, the company failed to get the charge registered with the concerned Registrar
within the first as well as second statutory period available as per law. This was adversely
commented by the internal auditors of the bank and therefore, after a strict advisory
received from Shahji, the senior manager of the bank, the company was prompted to take
steps for registration of charge. Name the specific type of fees which the company is now
required to pay for registration of charge.
(a) Special Fees.
(b) Ad-valorem Fees.
(c) A Late Registration Fees.
(d) Ad-valorem Duty.
5. Sumitra Healthcare and Hospitality Limited had issued 9% non-convertible debentures
which matured four years back. However, 1000 such debentures of ` 100 each are still
remaining unclaimed and unpaid even after the maturity. State the period after which the
company needs to transfer them to Investor Education and Protection Fund (IEPF) if they
remain unclaimed and unpaid.
(a) After the expiry of five years from the maturity date.
(b) After the expiry of six years from the maturity date
(c) After the expiry of seven years from the maturity date
(d) After the expiry of eight years from the maturity date.
6. Delight Sports Garments Limited is contemplating to raise funds through issue of
prospectus in which, according to the directors, a sum of ` 50 crores should be stated as
the minimum amount that needs to be subscribed by the prospective subscribers. The
funds shall be raised in four instalments consisting of application, allotment, first call and
second & final call. Advise the company by which instalment it should receive the minimum
subscription stated in the prospectus.
as approved by the Board and he is not liable to sign the same. Now, Mr. Prateek has
approached you advise him regarding his responsbilty for signing the financial statement.
Advise Mr. Prateek regarding his responsibility for signing the financial statements as per
the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
Mr. Prateek has also provided to you the following more informations:
1. The Board as a policy does not authorise the chairperson of the company to sign the
financial statements
2. The company has appointed Ms. Sunanina as its Company Secretary
OTHER LAWS
The Indian Contract Act, 1872
9. Mr. Chintu was appointed as Site Manager of ABC Constructions Company on a two years
contract at a monthly salary of ` 50,000. Mr. Ganesh gave a surety in respect of Mr. Chintu's
conduct. After six months the company was not in position to pay ` 50,000 to Mr. Chintu
because of financial constraints. Chintu agreed for a lower salary of ` 30,000 from the
company. This was not communicated to Mr. Ganesh. Three months afterwards it was
discovered that Chintu had been doing fraud since the time of his appointment. What is
the liability of Mr. Ganesh during the whole duration of Chintu's Appointment.
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
10. Mr. Madhavan drew a cheque payable to Mr. Vikas or order. Mr. Vikas lost the cheque and
was not aware of the loss of the cheque. The person who found the cheque forged the
signature of Mr. Vyas and endorsed it to Mr. Pawan as the consideration for goods bought
by him from Mr. Pawan. Mr. Pawan encashed the cheque, on the very same day from the
drawee bank. Mr. Vikas intimated the drawee bank about the theft of the cheque after three
days. Examine the liability of the drawee bank.
Give your answer in reference to the Provisions of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
The General Clauses Act, 1897
11. Vyas owned a land with fifty tamarind trees. He sold his land and the timber (obtained after
cutting the fifty trees) to Yash. Vyas wants to know whether the sale of timber tantamounts
to sale of immovable property. Advise him with reference to provisions of "General Clauses
Act, 1897”.
Interpretation of Statutes
12. Explain whether Foreign Decisions be used for construing Indian Acts.
SUGGESTED ANSWERS/HINTS
Looking at the above provision we can say that company can add the object of mobile app
development in its memorandum and divert public money into that business. But for that it
will have to comply with above requirements.
3. Section 83 of the Act of 2013 empowers the Registrar to make entries with respect to the
satisfaction and release of charges even if no intimation has been received by him from
the company.
Accordingly, with respect to any registered charge if an evidence is shown to the
satisfaction of Registrar that the debt secured by charge has been paid or satisfied in whole
or in part or that the part of the property or undertaking charged has been released from
the charge or has ceased to form part of the company’s property or undertaking, then he
may enter in the register of charges a memorandum of satisfaction that:
• the debt has been satisfied in whole or in part; or
• the part of the property or undertaking has been released from the charge or has
ceased to form part of the company’s property or undertaking.
This power can be exercised by the Registrar despite the fact that no intimation has been
received by him from the company.
Information to affected parties: The Registrar shall inform the affected parties within 30
days of making the entry in the register of charges.
Issue of Certificate: As per Rule 8 (2), in case the Registrar enters a memorandum of
satisfaction of charge in full, he shall issue a certificate of registration of satisfaction of
charge.
4. According to Section 96 of the Companies Act, 2013, every company shall be required to
hold its first annual general meeting within a period of 9 months from the closing of its first
financial year.
Also, if a company holds its first annual general meeting as aforesaid, it shall not be
necessary for the company to hold any annual general meeting in the year of its
incorporation:
It also provide that the Registrar may, for any special reason, extend the time within which
any annual general meeting, other than the first annual general meeting, shall be held, by
a period not exceeding three months.
In the given case, taking the first financial year of Neemrana Infotech Ltd is for the period
1st April 2017 to 31st March 2018, the first annual general meeting of the company should
be held on or before 31st December, 2018.
According to section 99, if any default is made in holding a meeting of the company in
accordance with section 96, the company and every officer of the company who is in
default shall be punishable with fine which may extend to one lakh rupees and in the case
of a continuing default, with a further fine which may extend to five thousand rupees for
every day during which such default continues.
Even though the Registrar of Companies is empowered to grant extension of time for a
period not exceeding 3 months for holding the annual general meetings, such power does
not apply in the case of the first annual general meeting. Thus, the company and its
directors will be liable under section 99 of the Companies Act, 2013 for the default if the
annual general meeting was held after 31 st December, 2018.
5. Section 106 (1) of the Companies Act, 2013 states that the articles of a company may
provide that no member shall exercise any voting right in respect of any shares registered
in his name on which any calls or other sums presently payable by him have not been paid,
or in regard to which the company has exercised any right of lien.
In the present case the articles of the company do not permit a shareholder to vote if he
has not paid the calls on the shares held by him. Therefore, the chairman at the meeting
is well within its right to refuse him the right to vote at the meeting and Mr. Pink’s contention
is not valid.
6. According to section 3A of the Companies Act, 2013, If at any time the number of members
of a company is reduced, in the case of a public company, below seven, in the case of a
private company, below two, and the company carries on business for more than six
months while the number of members is so reduced, every person who is a member of the
company during the time that it so carries on business after those six months and is
cognisant of the fact that it is carrying on business with less than seven members or two
members, as the case may be, shall be severally liable for the payment of the whole debts
of the company contracted during that time, and may be severally sued therefor.
Hence, in the given situation, the number of member in the said public company have fallen
below 7 [250-244=6] and these members have continued beyond the specified limit of 6
months, the reduced members of the company during the period of 1 month shall be
severally liable for the payment of the whole debts of the company contracted during that
time, and may be severally sued therefor.
7. According to section 96(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, every annual general meeting shall
be called during business hours, that is, between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m. on any day that is not
a National Holiday and shall be held either at the registered office of the company or a t
some other place within the city, town or village in which the registered office of the
company is situate.
Provided that annual general meeting of an unlisted company may be held at any place in
India if consent is given in writing or by electronic mode by all the members in advance.
Thus, in the first case, the company is rightful in calling the Annual General meeting at
Ansal Plaza.
In the second scenario, in case of an unlisted company, annual general meeting may be
held at any place in India if consent is given in writing or by electronic mode by all the
members in advance. Hence, if consent is given in writing or by electronic mode by all the
members in advance, the AGM can be called at Jaipur, otherwise not.
8. According to section 134(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, the financial statement, including
consolidated financial statement, if any, shall be approved by the Board of Directors before
they are signed on behalf of the Board by the chairperson of the company where he is
authorised by the Board or by two directors out of which one shall be managing director, if
any, and the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the company secretary
of the company, wherever they are appointed, or in the case of One Person Company, only
by one director, for submission to the auditor for his report thereon.
As per the facts of the question, the Board has not authorised the chairperson of the
company to sign the financial statements. Hence, the financial statement shall be signed
by two directors out of which one shall be managing director [i.e. Mr. Prateek].
9. As per the provisions of Section 133 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, if the creditor makes
any variance (i.e. change in terms) without the consent of the surety, then surety is
discharged as to the transactions subsequent to the change.
In the instant case, Mr. Ganesh is liable as a surety for the loss suffered by ABC
Constructions company due to misappropriation of cash by Mr. Chintu during the first six
months but not for misappropriations committed after the reduction in salary.
Hence, Mr. Ganesh, will be liable as a surety for the act of Mr. Chintu before the change
in the terms of the contract i.e., during the first six months. Variation in the terms of the
contract (as to the reduction of salary) without consent of Mr. Ganesh, will discharge
Mr. Ganesh from all the liabilities towards the act of the Mr. Chintu after such variation.
10. Cheque payable to order
According to Section 85 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
(1) Where a cheque payable to order purports to be indorsed by or on behalf of the payee,
the drawee is discharged by payment in due course.
(2) Where a cheque is originally expressed to be payable to bearer, the drawee is
discharged by payment in due course to the bearer thereof, notwithstanding any
indorsement whether in full or in blank appearing thereon, and notwithstanding that
any such indorsement purports to restrict or exclude further negotiation.
As per the given facts, cheque is drawn payable to “Mr. Vikas or order”. It was lost and Mr.
Vikas was not aware of the same. The person found the cheque and forged and endorsed
it to Mr. Pawan, who encashed the cheque from the drawee bank. After few days, Mr. Vikas
intimated about the theft of the cheque, to the drawee bank, by which time, the drawee
bank had already made the payment.
According to above stated section 85, the drawee banker is discharged when it has made
a payment against the cheque payable to order when it is purported to be endorsed by or
on behalf of the payee. Even though the signature of Mr. Vikas is forged, the banker is
protected and is discharged. The true owner, Mr. Vikas, cannot recover the money from
the drawee bank in this situation.
11. “Immovable Property” [Section 3(26) of the General Clauses Act, 1897]: ‘Immovable
Property’ shall include:
(i) Land,
(ii) Benefits to arise out of land, and
(iii) Things attached to the earth, or
(iv) Permanently fastened to anything attached to the earth.
It is an inclusive definition. It contains four elements: land, benefits to arise out of land,
things attached to the earth and things permanently fastened to anything attached to the
earth. Where, in any enactment, the definition of immovable property is in the negative and
not exhaustive, the definition as given in the General Clauses Act will apply to the
expression given in that enactment.
In the instant case, Vyas sold Land along with timber (obtained after cutting trees) of fifty
tamarind trees of his land. According to the above definition, Land is immovable property;
however, timber cannot be immovable property since the same are not attached to the
earth.
12. The normal function of a proviso is to except something out of the enactment or to qualify
something stated in the enactment which would be within its purview if the proviso were
not there. The effect of the proviso is to qualify the preceding enactment which is expressed
in terms which are too general. As a general rule, a proviso is added to an enactment to
qualify or create an exception to what is in the enactment ordinarily a proviso is not
interpreted as it stating a general rule.
It is a cardinal rule of interpretation that a proviso to a particular provision of a statute only
embraces the field which is covered by the main provision. It carves out an exception to
the provision to which it has been enacted as a proviso and not to the other. (Ram Narain
Sons Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax. A.I.R,1995 SC 765)
Provided that
auditor of a
company may
voluntarily
include the
statement
referred to in this
rule for the
financial year
commencing on
or after 1st April,
2014 and ending
on or before 31st
March, 2015.
VII Clarification Notification No. G.S.R. 583(E) - For the purposes
regarding dated 13th June, 2017 stated that of clause (i) of
applicability of requirements of reporting under sub-section (3)
exemption section 143(3)(i) read Rule 10 A of of section 143,
given to the Companies(Audit and Auditors) for the financial
certain private Rules, 2014 of the Companies Act years
companies 2013 shall not apply to certain commencing on
under section private companies. Through issue or after 1st April,
143(3)(i) vide of this circular, it is hereby clarified 2015, the report
circular no. that the exemption shall be of the auditor
08/2017 dated applicable for those audit reports in shall state about
25th July 2017 respect of financial statements existence of
pertaining to financial year, adequate internal
commencing on or after 1st April, financial controls
2016, which are made on or after system and its
the date of the said notification. operating
effectiveness:
Provided that
auditor of a
company may
voluntarily
include the
statement
referred to in this
rule for the
financial year
commencing on
or after 1st April,
2014 and ending
on or before 31st
March, 2015.
VIII Enforcement In the Companies (Acceptance of 5.8 Provided that a
of the Deposits) Rules, 2014, in rule 3, in private company
Companies sub-rule (3), for the proviso, the may accept from
(Acceptance following shall be substituted, its members
of Deposits) namely:- monies not
Second “Provided that a Specified IFSC exceeding one
Amendment Public company and a private hundred per cent
Rules, 2017 company may accept from its of aggregate of
Vide members monies not exceeding the paid up
Notification one hundred per cent. of aggregate share capital,
G.S.R. of the paid up share capital, free free reserves
1172(E) dated reserves and securities premium and securities
19th account and such company shall premium
September, file the details of monies so account and
2017 in accepted to the Registrar in Form such company
exercise of DPT -3. shall file the
powers Explanation.—For the purpose of details of monies
conferred by this rule, a Specified IFSC Public so accepted to
section 73 and company means an unlisted public the Registrar in
73 read with company which is licensed to such manner as
469(1) and operate by the Reserve Bank of may be
469(2). India or the Securities and specified.
Exchange Board of India or the
Insurance Regulatory and
Development Authority of India
from the International Financial
Services Centre located in an
approved multi services Special
Economic Zone set-up under the
Special Economic Zones Act, 2005
read with the Special Economic
Zones Rules, 2006:
188 relating to
related party
transactions of
the Companies
Act, 2013.
(vi) in clause (51),- 1.11 (iii) the whole-
time director;
(a) in sub-clause (iv), the word (iv) the Chief
"and" shall be omitted; Financial
(b) for sub-clause (v), the following Officer; and
sub-clauses shall be substituted, (v) such other
namely:- officer as may
"(v) such other officer, not more be prescribed;
than one level below the directors
who is in whole-time employment,
designated as key managerial
personnel by the Board; and
(vi) such other officer as may be
prescribed;"
(vii) in clause (57), for the words 1.12 ……the
"and securities premium account", aggregate value
the words ", securities premium of the paid-up
account and debit or credit balance share capital
of profit and loss account," shall be and all reserves
substituted created out of
the profits and
securities
premium
account, after
deducting the
aggregate…..
(viii) in clause (71), in sub-clause 1.15 –
(a), after the word "company;", the (The word is
word "and" shall be inserted; newly inserted)
(ix) in clause (72), in the proviso, 1.16 -
in clause (A), after the words “State (The words are
Act”, the words “other than this Act newly inserted)
or the previous company law” shall
be inserted;
definition.
Further, the
change in
definition is
pending in the
Companies
(Amendment)
Bill, 2016.
2. After section 3 of the principal 2.4 -
Act, the following section shall be (The section is
inserted, namely:- newly inserted)
"3A. If at any time the number of
members of a company is reduced,
in the case of a public company,
below seven, in the case of a
private company, below two, and
the company carries on business
for more than six months while the
number of members is so reduced,
every person who is a member of
the company during the time that it
so carries on business after those
six months and is cognisant of the
fact that it is carrying on business
with less than seven members or
two members, as the case may be,
shall be severally liable for the
payment of the whole debts of the
company contracted during that
time, and may be severally sued
therefor.".
Enforcement Date: 9 th February,
2018
3. In section 4 of the principal Act, 2.11 Upon receipt
in sub-section (5), for clause (i), the of an
following shall be substituted, application, the
namely:- Registrar may,
"(i) Upon receipt of an application on the basis of
under sub-section (4), the Registrar information
may, on the basis of information and documents
and documents furnished along furnished along
with the application, reserve the with the
(b) Secondly,
under the
Financial
informations,
……. applied
directly or
indirectly;
(d) state such
other matters
and set out
such other
reports, as may
be prescribed.
8. In section 35 of the principal Act, 3.22 -
in sub-section (2), after clause (b), (The clause is
the following clause shall be newly inserted)
inserted, namely:- To be inserted in
"(c) that, as regards every Point (2) after
misleading statement purported to point (b)
be made by an expert or contained
in what purports to be a copy of or
an extract from a report or valuation
of an expert, it was a correct and
fair representation of the
statement, or a correct copy of, or
a correct and fair extract from, the
report or valuation; and he had
reasonable ground to believe and
did up to the time of the issue of the
prospectus believe, that the person
making the statement was
competent to make it and that the
account to be
called as
deposit
repayment
reserve account
14. In section 73 of the principal 5.6 (d) providing
Act, in sub-section (2),— such deposit
(ii) clause (d) shall be omitted; insurance in
such manner
Enforcement Date: 15 th August, and to such
2018 extent as may
be prescribed
14. In section 73 of the principal 5.6 (e) certifying that
Act, in sub-section (2),— the ………. Act or
(iii) in clause (e), for the words payment of
"such deposits;", the following shall interest on such
be substituted, namely:— deposits
"such deposits and where a default
had occurred, the company made
good the default and a period of five
years had lapsed since the date of
making good the default;".
Enforcement Date: 15th August,
2018
15. In section 74, in sub-section 5.13 repay within
(1), for clause (b), the following one year from
clause shall be substituted, such
namely:— commencemen
"(b) repay within three years from t or from the
such commencement or on or date on which
before expiry of the period for such payments
which the deposits were accepted, are due,
whichever is earlier: whichever is
Provided that renewal of any such earlier
deposits shall be done in
accordance with the provisions of
Chapter V and the rules made
thereunder.".
Enforcement Date: 15th August,
2018
# Page number of the Study material (SM) with reference of relevant provisions
Please note: The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has replaced Rule 14 of the Companies
(Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rule, 2014 through Companies (Prospectus and
Allotment of Securities) Second Rule, 2018. Hence, students are advised not to read the content
related to Rule 14(2) of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rule, 2014 as
contained on pages 3.31 and Page 3.32 of Study Material. [For May 2019 examinations the said
amended rule has not been made applicable for the students.]
QUESTIONS
4. Shruti, a common friend of Suchitra and Sukanya, got incorporated OPC sometime before
and during a chit-chat with her friends informed them that there is some limit on the
maximum capital which her OPC can have and she would have to convert her OPC either
into a private or public limited company if such limit exceeded. Suchitra and Sukanya who
are desirous of forming a private limited company for carrying on textile trading business,
are unsure about the maximum capital which a private limited company can have. Advise.
(a) A private limited company can have maximum of ` One crore as share capital.
(b) A private limited company can have maximum of ` Two crores as share capital.
(c) A private limited company can have maximum of ` Five crores as share capital.
(d) A private limited company can have unlimited share capital.
5. Vinay and Sanjay made a name reservation application accompanied by requisite fee to
the Registrar for forming a new private company. The Registrar accorded its approval for
reservation of most preferred name Vinanjay Softwares Private Ltd. on 7 th July, 2018. By
which date necessary documents for incorporation of the company must be submitted to
the Registrar so that the reserved name does not get lapsed.
(a) Latest by 20th July, 2018
(b) Latest by 27th July, 2018
(c) Latest by 4th August, 2018
(d) Latest by 4th September, 2018
6. Aman contracts to indemnify Megha against the consequences of any proceedings which
Chandar may take against Megha in respect of a sum of ` 15000/- advanced by Chandar
to Megha. Now, Megha who is called upon to pay the sum of money to Chandar but she
fails to do so. Now, as per the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, advise the future
course of action to be taken by Chandar.
(a) Chandar can recover the amount only from Megha
(b) Chandar can recover the full amount from Aman
(c) Chandar cannot recover the amount from Aman
(d) Chandar can recover at least 10% of the total amount from Megha
DIVISION B - DETAILED QUESTIONS
COMPANY LAW
The Companies Act, 2013
1. MNO a One Person company (OPC) was incorporated during the year 2015-16 with an
authorised capital of ` 45 lakhs (4.5 lakhs shares of ` 10 each). The capital was fully
subscribed and paid up. Turnover of the company during 2015-16 and 2016-17 was ` 2
crores and ` 2.5 crores respectively. Promoter of the company seeks your advice in the
following circumstances, whether MNO (OPC) can convert into any other kind of company
during 2017-18. Please, advise with reference to relevant provisions of the Companies Act,
2013 in the below mentioned circumstances:
(i) If promoter increases the paid up capital of the company by ` 10 lakhs during 2017-18
(ii) If turnover of the company during 2017-18 was ` 3 crores.
2. The paid-up share capital of Altar Private Limited is ` 1 crore, consisting of 8 lacs Equity
Shares of ` 10 each, fully paid-up and 2 lacs Cumulative Preference Shares of `10 each,
fully paid-up. New Private Limited and Ultra Private Limited are holding 3 lacs Equity
Shares and 50,000 Equity Shares respectively in Altar Private Limited. New Private Limited
and Ultra Private Limited are the subsidiaries of PQR Private Limited. With reference to
the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 examine whether Altar Private Limited is a
subsidiary of PQR Private Limited? Would your answer be different if PQR Private Limited
has 8 out of 9 Directors on the Board of Altar Private Limited?
3. Data Limited (listed on Stock Exchange) was incorporated on 1 st October, 2018 with a paid-
up share capital of ` 200 crores. Within this small time of 4 months it has earned huge
profits and has topped the charts for its high employee friendly environment. The company
wants to issue sweat equity to its employees. A friend of the CEO of the company has told
him that they cannot issue sweat equity shares as 2 years have not elapsed since the time
company has commenced its business. The CEO of the company has approached you to
advise them about the essential conditions to fulfilled before the issue of sweat equity
shares especially since their company is just a few months old.
4. Walnut Limited has an authorized share capital of 1,00,000 equity shares of ` 100 per
share and an amount of ` 3 crores in its Share Premium Account as on 31-3-2018. The
Board of Directors seeks your advice about the application of share premium account for
its business purposes. Please give your advice.
5. Ashish Ltd. having a net-worth of ` 80 crores and turnover of ` 30 crores wants to accept
deposits from public other than its members. Referring to the provisions of the Companies
Act, 2013, state the conditions and the procedures to be followed by Ashish Ltd. for
accepting deposits from public other than its members.
6. RST Ltd. declared dividend at the rate of 20% for the financial year 2017-2018 in the AGM
scheduled on 15th June 2018. As RST Ltd. is left with certain unpaid and unclaimed
dividend, it transferred amount of unpaid and unclaimed dividend to UDA (unpaid dividend
account). After remaining unpaid and unclaimed for more than 2 years in the UDA, some
of the entitled shareholders made liable RST Ltd. for noncompliance of section 124, and
claimed for their unpaid dividend amount. RST Ltd. denies saying that there were certain
legal issues on the entitlement of the dividend amount to the respective shareholders.
State in the light of the given facts, whether the allegation marked by shareholders and
claim for the divided amount, against RST Ltd. is justifiable?
7. Examine the following situations in the light of the Companies Act, 2013
(i) Mr. Ayush, a Chartered accountant has been appointed as an auditor of X Ltd. in the
Annual General Meeting of the company held in September, 2018, in which he
accepted the assignment. Subsequently, in January, 2019 he joined B, as a partner
for the consultancy firm of Mr. B. Mr. B is working also working as a Finance Executive
of X Ltd.
(ii) “Mr. Abhi”, a practicing Chartered Accountant, is holding securities of “Abhiman Ltd.”
having face value of ` 1000/-. Whether Mr. Abhi is qualified for appointment as an
Auditor of Abhiman Ltd.”?
8. Primal Limited is a company incorporated in India. It owns two subsidiaries- Privy Limited
(in which it holds 75% shares) and Malvy Limited (a wholly owned subsidiary). Both the
subsidiaries are incorporated outside India. The Board of Directors of Primal Limited
intends to call an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) of Primal Limited on urgent basis.
Advise the Board of Directors on the following:
(i) EGM be held in India
(ii) EGM be held in Netherlands
OTHER LAWS
The Indian Contract Act, 1872
9. ‘A’ gives to ‘M’ a continuing guarantee to the extent of ` 8,000 for the fruits to be supplied
by ‘M’ to ‘S’ from time to time on credit. Afterwards ‘S’ became embarrassed and without
the knowledge of ‘A’, ‘M’ and ‘S’ contract that ‘M’ shall continue to supply ‘S’ with fruits for
ready money and that payments shall be applied to the then existing debts between ‘S’
and ‘M’. Examining the provision of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, decide whether ‘A’ is
liable on his guarantee given to M.
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
10. Manoj owes money to Umesh. Therefore, he makes a promissory note for the amount in
favour of Umesh, for safety of transmission he cuts the note in half and posts one half to
Umesh. He then changes his mind and calls upon Umesh to return the half of the note
which he had sent. Umesh requires Manoj to send the other half of the promissory note.
Decide how rights of the parties are to be adjusted.
Give your answer in reference to the Provisions of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
SUGGESTED ANSWERS/HINTS
2. In terms of section 2 (87) of the Companies Act 2013 "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary",
in relation to any other company (that is to say the holding company), means a company
in which the holding company—
(i) controls the composition of the Board of Directors; or
(ii) exercises or controls more than one-half of the total voting power either at its own or
together with one or more of its subsidiary companies:
Explanation.—For the purposes of this clause,—
(a) a company shall be deemed to be a subsidiary company of the holding company even
if the control referred to in sub-clause (i) or sub-clause (ii) is of another subsidiary
company of the holding company;
(b) the composition of a company's Board of Directors shall be deemed to be controlled
by another company if that other company by exercise of some power exercisable by
it at its discretion can appoint or remove all or a majority of the directors.
In the present case, New Pvt. Ltd. and Ultra Pvt. Ltd. together hold less than one half of
the total share capital i.e. less than one-half of total voting power. Hence, PQR Private Ltd.
(holding of New Pvt. Ltd. and Ultra Pvt. Ltd) will not be a holding company of Altar Pvt. Ltd.
However, if PQR Pvt. Ltd. has 8 out of 9 Directors on the Board of Altar Pvt. Ltd. i.e.
controls the composition of the Board of Directors; it (PQR Pvt. Ltd.) will be treated as the
holding company of Altar Pvt. Ltd.
3. Sweat equity shares of a class of shares already issued.
According to section 54 of the Companies Act, 2013, a company may issue sweat equity
shares of a class of shares already issued, if the following conditions are fulfilled, namely—
(i) the issue is authorised by a special resolution passed by the company;
(ii) the resolution specifies the number of shares, the current market price,
consideration, if any, and the class or classes of directors or employees to whom
such equity shares are to be issued;
(iii) where the equity shares of the company are listed on a recognised stock exchange,
the sweat equity shares are issued in accordance with the regulations made by the
Securities and Exchange Board in this behalf and if they are not so listed, the sweat
equity shares are issued in accordance with such rules as prescribed under Rule 8 of
the Companies (Share and Debentures) Rules, 2014,
The rights, limitations, restrictions and provisions as are for the time being applicable
to equity shares shall be applicable to the sweat equity shares issued under this section
and the holders of such shares shall rank pari passu with other equity shareholders.
Data Limited can issue Sweat equity shares by following the conditions as mentioned
above. It does not make a difference that the company is just a few months old.
4. According to section 52 of the Companies Act, 2013, where a company issues shares at a
premium, whether for cash or otherwise, a sum equal to the aggregate amount of the
premium received on those shares shall be transferred to a "securities premium account"
and the provisions of this Act relating to reduction of share capital of a company shall,
except as provided in this section, apply as if the securities premium account were the
paid-up share capital of the company.
The securities premium account may be applied by the company—
(a) towards the issue of unissued shares of the company to the members of the company
as fully paid bonus shares;
(b) in writing off the preliminary expenses of the company;
(c) in writing off the expenses of, or the commission paid or discount allowed on, any
issue of shares or debentures of the company;
(d) in providing for the premium payable on the redemption of any redeemable preference
shares or of any debentures of the company; or
(e) for the purchase of its own shares or other securities under section 68
5. Acceptance of deposit from public: According to section 76 of the Companies Act, 2013,
a public company, having net worth of not less than 100 crore rupees or turnover of not
less than 500 crore rupees, can accept deposits from persons other than its members
subject to compliance with the requirements provided in sub-section (2) of section 73 and
subject to such rules as the Central Government may, in consultation with the Reserve
Bank of India, prescribe.
Provided that such a company shall be required to obtain the rating (including its net-worth,
liquidity and ability to pay its deposits on due date) from a recognised credit rating agency
for informing the public the rating given to the company at the time of invitation of deposits
from the public which ensures adequate safety and the rating shall be obtained for every
year during the tenure of deposits.
Provided further that every company accepting secured deposits from the public shall
within thirty days of such acceptance, create a charge on its assets of an amount not less
than the amount of deposits accepted in favour of the deposit holders in accordance with
such rules as may be prescribed.
Since, Ashish Ltd. has a net worth of ` 80 crores and turnover of ` 30 crores, which is
less than the prescribed limits, hence, it cannot accept deposit from public other than its
members. If the company wants to accept deposits from public other than its members,
it has to fulfill the eligibility criteria of net worth or Turnover or both and then the other
conditions as stated above.
6. As per section 124 of the Companies Act, 2013, where a dividend has been declared by a
company but has not been paid/claimed to/by shareholder within 30 days from the date of
the declaration, the company shall, within 7 days from the date of expiry of the said period
of 30 days, transfer the total amount of dividend which remains unpaid/unclaimed to the
Unpaid Dividend Account.
The company shall, within a period of 90 days of making any transfer of an amount, prepare
a statement containing the names, their last known addresses and the unpaid dividend to
be paid to each person and place it on the web-site of the company, if any, and also on
any other web-site approved by the Central Government for this purpose, in such form,
manner and other particulars as may be prescribed.
Accordingly, in the given situation, RST Ltd. failed to give statement of Unpaid/unclaimed
dividend and so liable for the said nonc ompliance of section 124 of the Companies Act,
2013. Any person claiming to be entitled to any money transferred under section 124(1) to
the Unpaid Dividend Account of the company may apply to the company for payment of
the money claimed. Since RST Ltd. failed to comply with the requirements of this section
as to the preparing of a statement of unpaid dividend, so shall be punishable with fine
which shall not be less than five lakh rupees but which may extend to twenty-five lakh
rupees and every officer of the company who is in default shall be punishable with fine
which shall not be less than one lakh rupees but which may extend to 5 lakh rupees.
7. (i) Provisions and Explanation: Section 141(3) (c) of the Companies Act, 2013
prescribes that any person who is a partner or in employment of an officer or
employee of the company will be disqualified to act as an auditor of a company. Sub-
section (4) of Section 141 provides that an auditor who becomes subject, after his
appointment, to any of the disqualifications specified in sub-sections (3) of Section
141, he shall be deemed to have vacated his office as an auditor.
Conclusion: In the present case, Ayush, an auditor of X Ltd., joined as partner with
B, who is Finance executive of X Ltd., has attracted clause (3) (c) of Section 141 and,
therefore, he shall be deemed to have vacated office of the auditor of X Limited.
(ii) As per section 141 (3)(d) (i) an auditor is disqualified to be appointed as an auditor if
he, or his relative or partner holding any security of or interest in the company or its
subsidiary, or of its holding or associate company or a subsidiary of such holding
company:
In the present case, Mr. Abhi. is holding security of ` 1000 in the Abhiman Ltd,
therefore he is not eligible for appointment as an Auditor of “Abhiman Ltd.”
8. According to section 100 of the Companies Act, 2013, the Board may, whenever it deems
fit, call an extraordinary general meeting of the company.
Provided that an extraordinary general meeting of the company, other than of the wholly
owned subsidiary of a company incorporated outside India, shall be held at a place within
India.
In the light of the above provisions:
(i) The Board of Directors can call the EGM in India.
(ii) The Board of Directors cannot call the EGM of Primal Limited outside India as it is a
company incorporated in India.
9. Discharge of surety by variance in terms of contract: The problem asked in the
question is based on the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 as contained in
Section 133. The section provides that any variance made without the surety’s consent in
the terms of the contract between the principal debtor and the creditor, discharges the
surety as to transactions subsequent to the variance.
In the given problem, ‘M’ and ‘S’ entered into arrangement by entering into a new contract
without knowledge of the Surety ‘A’. Since, the variance made in the contract is without
the surety’s consent in the existing contract, as per the provision, ‘A’ is not liable on his
guarantee for the fruits supplied after this new arrangement. The reason for such a
discharge is that the surety agreed to be liable for a contract which is no more there now
and he is not liable on the altered contract because it is different from the contract made
by him.
10. The question arising in this problem is whether the making of promissory note is complete
when one half of the note was delivered to Umesh. Under Section 46 of the Negoti able
Instruments Act, 1881, the making of a promissory note is completed by delivery, actual or
constructive. Delivery refers to the whole of the instrument and not merely a part of it.
Delivery of half instrument cannot be treated as constructive delivery of the whole. So, the
claim of Umesh to have the other half of the promissory note sent to him is not
maintainable. Manoj is justified in demanding the return of the first half sent by him. He
can change his mind and refuse to send the other half of the promissory note.
11. As per the provisions of Section 27 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, where any legislation
or regulation requires any document to be served by post, then unless a different intention
appears, the service shall be deemed to be effected by:
(i) properly addressing,
(ii) pre-paying, and
Provided that
auditor of a
company may
voluntarily
include the
statement
referred to in this
rule for the
financial year
commencing on
or after 1st April,
2014 and ending
on or before 31st
March, 2015.
7. Clarification Notification No. G.S.R. 583(E) - For the purposes
regarding dated 13th June, 2017 stated that of clause (i) of
applicability of requirements of reporting under sub-section (3)
exemption section 143(3)(i) read Rule 10 A of of section 143,
given to the Companies(Audit and Auditors) for the financial
certain private Rules, 2014 of the Companies Act years
companies 2013 shall not apply to certain commencing on
under section private companies. Through issue or after 1st April,
143(3)(i) vide of this circular, it is hereby clarified 2015, the report
circular no. that the exemption shall be of the auditor
08/2017 dated applicable for those audit reports in shall state about
25th July 2017 respect of financial statements existence of
pertaining to financial year, adequate internal
commencing on or after 1st April, financial controls
2016, which are made on or after system and its
the date of the said notification. operating
effectiveness:
Provided that
auditor of a
company may
voluntarily
include the
statement
referred to in this
rule for the
financial year
commencing on
or after 1st April,
2014 and ending
on or before 31st
March, 2015.
related party
transactions of
the Companies
Act, 2013.
(vi) in clause (51),- 1.11 (iii) the whole-
time director;
(a) in sub-clause (iv), the word (iv) the Chief
"and" shall be omitted; Financial
Officer; and
(b) for sub-clause (v), the following (v) such other
sub-clauses shall be substituted, officer as may
namely:- "(v) such other officer, not be prescribed;
more than one level below the
directors who is in whole-time
employment, designated as key
managerial personnel by the
Board; and
(vi) such other officer as may be
prescribed;"
(vii) in clause (57), for the words 1.12 ……the
"and securities premium account", aggregate value
the words ", securities premium of the paid-up
account and debit or credit balance share capital
of profit and loss account," shall be and all reserves
substituted created out of
the profits and
securities
premium
account, after
deducting the
aggregate…..
(viii) in clause (71), in sub-clause 1.15 –
(a), after the word "company;", the (The word is
word "and" shall be inserted; newly inserted)
(ix) in clause (72), in the proviso, 1.16 -
in clause (A), after the words “State Provided that no
Act”, the words “other than this Act institution shall
or the previous company law” shall be so notified
be inserted; unless—
(A) it has been
established or
constituted by or
under any
Central or State
Act;
(The words are
newly inserted)
(x) in clause (76), for sub-clause 1.17 (viii) any
(viii), the following sub-clause shall company which
be substituted, namely:— is—
"(viii) any body corporate which (A) a holding,
is— (A) a holding, subsidiary or subsidiary or
an associate company of such an associate
company; company of
(B) a subsidiary of a holding such company;
company to which it is also a or
subsidiary; or (B) a subsidiary
(C) an investing company or the of a holding
venturer of the company;"; company to
Explanation.—For the purpose of which it is also
this clause, “the investing company a subsidiary;
or the venturer of a company”
means a body corporate whose
investment in the company would
result in the company becoming an
associate company of the body
corporate.
(xi) in clause (85)- 1.20 For (a)
(a) in sub-clause (i), for the words paid-up share
"five crore rupees", the words "ten capital of which
crore rupees" shall be substituted; does not exceed
fifty lakh rupees
or such
higher amount
as may be
prescribed
which shall not
be more than
five crore
rupees; or
(b) in sub-clause (ii),- For (b)
(A) for the words "as per its last turnover of
profit and loss account", the words which as per its
"as per profit and loss account for last profit and
the immediately preceding financial loss account
year" shall be substituted; does not exceed
(B) for the words "twenty crore two crore rupees
rupees", the words "one hundred or such higher
crore rupees" shall be substituted; amount as may
be prescribed
which shall not
be more than
twenty crore
rupees:
(xii) for clause (91), the following 1.21 (91) Turnover
clause shall be substituted, means the
namely:- aggregate
'(91) "turnover" means the gross value of the
amount of revenue recognised in realisation of
the profit and loss account from the amount made
sale, supply, or distribution of from the sale,
goods or on account of services supply or
rendered, or both, by a company distribution of
during a financial year;'. goods or on
account of
services
rendered, or
both, by the
company
during a
financial year;
Note: There is
in ambiguity in
definition. So,
there is a need
for amendment
in this
definition.
Further, the
change in
definition is
pending in the
Companies
(Amendment)
Bill, 2016.
1316(E) dated
21st March,
2018
13. ‘Reservation Rule 9: Reservation of name 2.11 -
of Name of An application for reservation of (This Rule may
Company’ name shall be made through the read with
web service available at respect to point
Notification www.mca.gov.in by using [form (iv) Requirement
G.S.R. 284(E) RUN](Reserve Unique Name) for reservation of
dated 23 rd along with fee as provided in the the name of the
March, 2018 Companies (Registration offices company)
and fees) Rules, 2014, which may
either be approved or rejected, as
the case may be, by the Registrar,
Central Registration Centre after
allowing re--submission of such
application within fifteen days for
rectification of the defects, if any.
*Page No. of the Study material (New study material) with reference of relevant provisions
QUESTIONS
COMPANY LAW
The Companies Act, 2013
1. Prakhar Ltd. intends to raise share capital by issuing Equity Shares in different stages over
a certain period of time. However, the company does not wish to issue prospectus each
and every time of issue of shares. Considering the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013,
discuss what formalities Prakhar Ltd. should follow to avoid repeated issuance of
prospectus?
2. Earth Ltd., a Public Company offer the new shares (further issue of shares) to persons
other than the existing shareholders of the Company. Explain the conditions when shares
can be issued to persons other than existing shareholders. Discuss whethe r these shares
can be offered to the Preference Shareholders?
3. Examine the validity of the following with reference to the relevant provisions of the
Companies Act, 2013:
(i) The Board of Directors of Shrey Ltd. called an extraordinary general meeting upon
the requisition of members. However, the meeting was adjourned on the ground that
the quorum was not present at the meeting. Advise the company.
(ii) Mary Ltd is a listed company having turnover of ` 1200 crores during the financial
year 2016-17. The CSR committee of the Board formulated and recommended a
CSR project which was approved by the Board. The company finalised the project
under its CSR initiatives which require funds @ 5 % of average net profit of the
company for last three financial years. Will such excess expense be counted in
subsequent financial years as a part of CSR expenditure? Advise the company.
4. Examine the validity of the following decisions of the Board of Directors with reference of
the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
(i) In an Annual General Meeting of Vrinda Ltd. having share capital, 80 members
present in person or by proxy holding more than 1/10 th of the total voting power,
demanded for poll. The chairman of the meeting rejected the request on the ground
that only the members present in person can demand for poll.
(ii) In an annual general meeting, during the process of poll, the members who earlier
demanded for poll want to withdraw it. The chairman of the meeting rejected the
request on the ground that once poll started, it cannot be withdrawn.
5. Growmore Limited’s share capital is divided into different classes. Now, Growmore Limited
intends to vary the rights attached to a particular class of shares. Explain the provisions of
the Companies Act, 2013 to Growmore Limited as to obtaining consent from the
shareholders in relation to variation of rights.
6. Heavy Metals Limited wants to provide financial assistance to its employees, to enable
them to subscribe for certain number of fully paid shares. Considering the provision of the
Companies Act, 2013, what advice would you give to the company in this regard?
7. Lemon & Company, Chartered Accountants a Limited Liability Partnership firm with CA. L,
CA. M and CA. N as partners, is the statutory auditor of a listed company M/s Big Limited
for past 6 years as on 01.04.2014.
CA.M is also a partner in other Chartered Accountant firm Dew & Company, Chartered
Accountants. Advise under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 :
(1) Upto how many years can Lemon & Company continue as statutory auditors of M/s
Big Limited?
(2) What shall be the cooling-off period for Lemon & Company with respect to M/s Big
Limited?
(3) Can Dew & Company; be appointed as statutory auditors of M/s Big Limited and it's
another listed subsidiary M/s Dark Limited during such cooling-off period?
(4) Can Lemon & Company be appointed as internal auditors of M/s Big Limited and it's
another listed subsidiary M/s Dark Limited, during such cooling-off period?
8. Mrs. Sita, wife of CA. ‘Arjun' the statutory auditor of Stellar Builders Limited, acquired
shares in the company for a face value of `75000/- on 15th March, 2018. CA. ‘Arjun’, issued
his audit report on 25 th April, 2018. Examine the validity of this transaction under the
Companies Act, 2013. Would your answer be different if face value of the shares have
been ` 150000/- (market value ` 95000/-)?
9. The Board of Directors of Sindhu Limited wants to make some changes and to alter some
Clauses of the Articles of Association which are to be urgently carried out, which include
the increase in Authorized Capital of the company, issue of shares, increase in borrowing
limits and increase in the number of directors.
Discuss about the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 to be followed for alteration of
Articles of Association.
10. The directors of Element Ltd. want to voluntary revise the Financial statements of the
company. They have approached you to state to them the provisions of the Companies
Act, 2013 regarding voluntary revision of financial statements.
OTHER LAWS
The Indian Contract Act, 1872
11. Explaining the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, answer the following:
(i) A contracts with B for a fixed price to construct a house for B within a stipulated time.
B would supply the necessary material to be used in the construction. C guarantees
A’s performance of the contract. B does not supply the material as per the agreement.
Is C discharged from his liability?
(ii) C, the holder of an over due bill of exchange drawn by A as surety for B, and accepted
by B, contracts with X to give time to B. Is A discharged from his liability?
12. Mr. Avinash wanted a loan for expanding his business, from ABC Bank. Mr. Avinash has
pledged the stock of his business to obtain the loan from bank. However, the expansion of
business did not reap the desired results and Mr. Avinash was not able to repay the loan.
Now, ABC bank wants to retain the stock for adjustment of their loan. Advise, ABC Bank
whether they can retain the stock for the adjustment of their loan and also for payment of
interest. Give your answer as per the provisions of the Contract Act, 1872.
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
13. A bill of exchange has been dishonoured by non- payment. Now, Mr. Sandip, the holder
wants a certificate of protest for such a dishonoured bill. Advise, Mr. Sandip whether he
can get the certificate of protest. Also, advise him regarding the provisions of Protest for
better security.
The General Clauses Act, 1897
14. Mr. Ram, an advocate has fraudulently deceived his client Mr. Shyam, who was taking his
expert advise on taxation matters. Now, Mr. Ram is liable to a fine for acting fraudulently
both under the Advocates Act, 1961 as well as the Income Tax Act, 1961. State the
provision as to whether his offence is punishable under the both the Acts, as per the
General Clauses Act, 1897.
SUGGESTED ANSWERS/HINTS
subject to the compliance with the applicable provisions of Chapter III and any other
conditions as may be prescribed.
(c) if any equity shareholder to whom the shares are offered in terms of section 62 (1)
(a) as described above, declines such offer, the Board of Directors may dispose of
the shares in such manner as is not disadvantageous to the shareholders or to the
company.
Preference Shareholders: From the wordings of Section 62 (1) (c), it is quite clear that
these shares can be issued to any persons who may be preference shareholders as well
provided such issue is authorized by a special resolution of the company and are issued
on such conditions as may be prescribed.
3. (i) According to section 100 (2) of the Companies Act 2013, the Board of directors
must convene a general meeting upon requisition by the stipulated minimum number
of members.
As per Section 103 (2) (b) of the Companies Act, 2013, if the quorum is not present
within half an hour from the appointed time for holding a meeting of the company, the
meeting, if called on the requisition of members, shall stand cancelled. Therefore, the
meeting stands cancelled and the stand taken by the Board of Directors to adjourn it,
is not proper.
(ii) In terms of Section 135(5) of the Companies Act, 2013, the Board of every company
to which section 135 is applicable, shall ensure that the company spends, in every
Financial year at least 2 per cent of average net profits of the company made during
the three immediately preceding financial years, in pursuance of its CSR policy. There
is no provision for carry forward of excess expenditure to the next year(s). The words
used in the section are 'at least'. Therefore, any expenditure over 2% would be
considered as voluntary higher spending. Hence, such excess expense will not be
counted in subsequent financial years as a part of CSR expenditure.
4. Section 109 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides for the demand of poll before or on the
declaration of the result of the voting on any resolution on show of hands. Accordingly law
says that:-
Order of demand for poll by the chairman of meeting: Before or on the declaration of
the result of the voting on any resolution on show of hands, a poll may be ordered to be
taken by the Chairman of the meeting on his own motion, and shall be ordered to be taken
by him on a demand made in that behalf:-
(a) In the case a company having a share capital, by the members present in person or
by proxy, where allowed, and having not less than one-tenth of the total voting power
or holding shares on which an aggregate sum of not less than five lakh rupees or
such higher amount as may be prescribed has been paid-up; and
(b) in the case of any other company, by any member or members present in person or by
proxy, where allowed, and having not less than one tenth of the total voting power.
Withdrawal of the demand: The demand for a poll may be withdrawn at any time by the
persons who made the demand.
Hence, on the basis on the above provisions of the Companies Act, 2013:
(i) The chairman cannot reject the demand for poll as poll can be demanded by the
members present in person or by proxy. subject to provision in the articles of
company.
(ii) The chairman cannot reject the request of the members for withdrawing the demand
of the Poll.
5. According to section 48 of the Companies Act, 2013-
(1) Variation in rights of shareholders with consent: Where a share capital of the
company is divided into different classes of shares, the rights attached to the shares
of any class may be varied with the consent in writing of the holders of not less than
three-fourths of the issued shares of that class or by means of a special resolution
passed at a separate meeting of the holders of the issued shares of that class,—
(a) if provision with respect to such variation is contained in the memorandum or
articles of the company; or
(b) in the absence of any such provision in the memorandum or articles, if such
variation is not prohibited by the terms of issue of the shares of that class:
Provided that if variation by one class of shareholders affects the rights of any other
class of shareholders, the consent of three-fourths of such other class of shareholders
shall also be obtained and the provisions of this section shall apply to such variation.
(2) No consent for variation: Where the holders of not less than ten per cent of the
issued shares of a class did not consent to such variation or vote in favour of the
special resolution for the variation, they may apply to the Tribunal to have the variation
cancelled, and where any such application is made, the variation shall not have effect
unless and until it is confirmed by the Tribunal:
Provided that an application under this section shall be made within twenty-one days
after the date on which the consent was given or the resolution was passed, as the
case may be, and may be made on behalf of the shareholders entitled to make the
application by such one or more of their number as they may appoint in writing for the
purpose.
6. Under section 67 (2) of the Companies Act, 2013 no public company is allowed to give,
directly or indirectly and whether by means of a loan, guarantee, or security, any financial
assistance for the purpose of, or in connection with, a purchase or subscription, by any
person of any shares in it or in its holding company.
However, section 67 (3) makes an exception by allowing companies to give loans to their
employees other than its directors or key managerial personnel, for an amount not
exceeding their salary or wages for a period of six months with a view to enabling them to
purchase or subscribe for fully paid-up shares in the company or its holding company to
be held by them by way of beneficial ownership.
It is further provided that disclosures in respect of voting rights not exercised directly by
the employees in respect of shares to which the scheme relates shall be made in the
Board's report in such manner as may be prescribed.
Hence, Heavy Metals Ltd can provide financial assistance upto the specified limit to its
employees to enable them to subscribe for the shares in the company provided the shares
are purchased by the employees to be held for beneficial ownership by them.
However, the directors or key managerial personnel will not be eligible for such assistance.
7. According to Section 139 (2) of the Companies Act, 2013,
I. Listed companies and other prescribed class or classes of companies (except one
person companies and small companies) shall not appoint or re-appoint an audit firm
as auditor for more than two terms of 5 consecutive years.
II. An audit firm which has completed its term (i.e. two terms of five consecutive years)
shall not be eligible for re- appointment as auditor in the same company for five years
from the completion of such term.
III. Further, as on the date of appointment no audit firm having a common partner or
partners to the other audit firm, whose tenure has expired in a company immediately
preceding the financial year, shall be appointed as an auditor of the same company
for a period of five years.
IV. For the purpose of the rotation of auditors, in case of an auditor (whether an individual
or audit firm), the period for which the individual or the firm has held off ice as auditor
prior to the commencement of the Act shall be taken into account for calculating the
period of 5 consecutive years or 10 consecutive years, as the case may be.
Applying the above provisions,
(1) Lemon & Company can continue as statutory auditors of M/s Big Limited for 4 more
years from 1.4.2014, i.e. they can continue in office only till 31.3.2018.
(2) The cooling- off period shall be of 5 years.
(3) Dew & Company cannot be appointed as a statutory auditor of M/s Big Limited during
the cooling – off period of Lemon & Company, as CA. M is the common partner in
both Lemon & Company and Dew & Company.
However, Dew & Company can be appointed as a statutory auditor of M/s Dark
Limited (a listed subsidiary of M/s Big Limited), during the cooling – off period.
(4) As per Section 138 (1) of the Companies Act, 2013, every listed company and other
prescribed class of companies, shall be required to appoint an internal auditor, who
default in complying with the stated provisions, the company and every officer who is
in default shall be liable to a penalty of one thousand rupees for every copy of the
articles issued without such alteration. [Section 15]
10. (1) Preparation of revised financial statement or revised report on the approval of
Tribunal: If it appears to the directors of a company that—
(a) the financial statement of the company; or
(b) the report of the Board,
do not comply with the provisions of section 129 or section 134, they may prepare
revised financial statement or a revised report in respect of any of the three preceding
financial years after obtaining approval of the Tribunal on an application made by the
company in such form and manner as may be prescribed and a copy of the order
passed by the Tribunal shall be filed with the Registrar:
Tribunal to serve the notice: Provided that the Tribunal shall give notice to the
Central Government and the Income tax authorities and shall take into consideration
the representations, if any, made by that Government or the authorities before
passing any order under this section:
Number of times of revision and recast: Provided further that such revised
financial statement or report shall not be prepared or filed more than once in a
financial year:
Reason for revision to be disclosed: Provided also that the detailed reasons for
revision of such financial statement or report shall also be disclosed in the Board's
report in the relevant financial year in which such revision is being made.
(2) Limits of revisions: Where copies of the previous financial statement or report have
been sent out to members or delivered to the Registrar or laid before the company in
general meeting, the revisions must be confined to—
(a) the correction in respect of which the previous financial statement or report do
not comply with the provisions of section 129 or section 134; and
(b) the making of any necessary consequential alternation.
(3) Framing of rules by the Central Government in relation to revised financial
statement or director's report: The Central Government may make rules as to the
application of the provisions of this Act in relation to revised financial statement or a
revised director's report and such rules may, in particular—
(a) make different provisions according to which the previous financial statement
or report are replaced or are supplemented by a document indicating the
corrections to be made;
(b) make provisions with respect to the functions of the company's auditor in relation
to the revised financial statement or report;
(c) require the directors to take such steps as may be prescribed.
11. (i) According to Section 134 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the surety is discharged
by any contract between the creditor and the principal debtor, by which the principal
debtor is released or by any act or omission of the creditor, the legal consequence of
which is the discharge of the principal debtor.
In the given case, B does not supply the necessary material as per the agreement.
Hence, C is discharged from his liability.
(ii) According to Section 136 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, where a contract to give
time to the principal debtor is made by the creditor with a third person and not with
the principal debtor, the surety is not discharged.
In the given question the contract to give time to the principal debtor is made by the
creditor with X who is a third person. X is not the principal debtor. Hence , A is not
discharged.
12. According to section 173 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the pawnee may retain the
goods pledged, not only for payment of the debt or the performance of the promise, but for
the interest, of the debt, and all necessary expenses incurred by him in respect of the
possession or for the preservation of the goods pledged.
Hence, ABC Bank can retain the stock of business of Mr. Avinash, not only for adjustment
of the loan but also for payment of interest.
13. Protest: According to section 100 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,1881, when a
promissory note or bill of exchange has been dishonored by non-acceptance or non-
payment, the holder may, within a reasonable time, cause such dishonor to be noted and
certified by a notary public. Such certificate is called a protest.
Protest for better security: When the acceptor of a bill of exchange has become
insolvent, or his credit has been publicly impeached, before the maturity of the bill, the
holder may, within a reasonable time, cause a notary public to demand better security of
the acceptor, and on its being refused may, with a reasonable time, cause such facts to be
noted and certified as aforesaid. Such certificate is called a protest for better security.
Thus, Mr. Sandip can get the certificate of protest by following the above provisions.
14. “Provision as to offence punishable under two or more enactments” [Section 26]:
Where an act or omission constitutes an offence under two or more enactments, then the
offender shall be liable to be prosecuted and punished under either or any of those
enactments, but shall not be punished twice for the same offence.
Thus, Mr. Ram shall be liable to punished under the Advocates Act, 1961 or the Income
Tax Act, 1961, but shall not be punished twice for the same offence.
15. ‘Read the Statute as a Whole’: It is the elementary principle that construction of a statute
is to be made of all its parts taken together and not of one part only. The deed/ statute
must be read as a whole in order to ascertain the true meaning of its several clauses, and
the words of each clause should be so interpreted as to bring them into harmony with other
provisions – if that interpretation does no violence to the meaning of which they are
naturally susceptible. And the same approach would apply with equal force with regard to
Acts and Rules passed by the legislature.
One of the safest guides to the construction of sweeping general words is to examine other
words of like import in the same enactment or instrument to see what limitations must be
imposed on them. If we find that a number of such expressions have to be subjected to
limitations and qualifications and that such limitations and qualifications are of the same
nature, that circumstance forms a strong argument for subjecting the expression in dispute
to a similar limitation and qualification.
In sub-section (2) of
section 96, for the
words "such other
place as the Central
Government may
approve in this
behalf”, the words
“such other place
within the city, town
or village in which the
registered office of
the company is
situate or such other
place as the Central
Government may
approve in this
behalf” shall be
substituted.”.
Insertion of Paragraph 2A in the principal notification G.S.R.
463(E), dated 5 th June 2015:
The aforesaid exceptions, modifications and adaptations (i.e. as
given in Notification G.S.R. 463(E), dated 5th June 2015 and
Notification G.S.R. 582(E) Dated 13th June, 2017) shall be
applicable to a Government company which has not committed
a default in filing of its financial statements under section 137 of
the Companies Act or annual return under section 92 of the said
Act with the Registrar.
3. Exemptions to Private The Central
Companies Vide Government amends
Notification G.S.R. the Notification
583(E) Dated 13 TH G.S.R. 464(E), dated
June, 2017 5th June 2015
whereby Exceptions,
Modifications and
Adaptations were
provided in case of
Private companies.
Following are the
amendments:
body corporate is
less than twice of
its paid up share
capital or fifty crore
rupees, whichever
is lower; and
(c) such a company
has not defaulted in
the repayment of
such borrowings
subsisting at the
time of accepting
deposits under this
section:
“(g) aggregate
amount of
remuneration drawn
by directors;”
Registrar in Form
DPT-3.
Explanation.—For
the purpose of this
rule, a Specified
IFSC Public
company means an
unlisted public
company which is
licensed to operate
by the Reserve Bank
of India or the
Securities and
Exchange Board of
India or the
Insurance
Regulatory and
Development
Authority of India
from the International
Financial Services
Centre located in an
approved multi
services Special
Economic Zone set-
up under the Special
Economic Zones Act,
2005 (28 of 2005)
read with the Special
Economic Zones
Rules, 2006:
QUESTIONS
COMPANY LAW
The Companies Act, 2013
1. The paid-up share capital of Saras Private Limited is ` 1 crore, consisting of 8 lacs Equity
Shares of ` 10 each, fully paid-up and 2 lacs Cumulative Preference Shares of `10 each,
fully paid-up. Jeevan (JVN) Private Limited and Sudhir Private Limited are holding 3 lacs
Equity Shares and 50,000 Equity Shares respectively in Saras Private Limited. Jeevan
Private Limited and Sudhir Private Limited are the subsidiaries of Piyush Private Limited.
With reference to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 examine whether Saras
Private Limited is a subsidiary of Piyush Private Limited? Would your answer be differe nt
if Piyush Private Limited has 8 out of 9 Directors on the Board of Saras Private Limited?
2. In a General Meeting of Amit Limited, the Chairman directed to exclude certain matters
detrimental to the interest of the company from the minutes. Manoj, a shareholder
contended that the minutes must contain fair and correct summary of the proceedings
thereat. Decide, whether the contention of Manoj is maintainable under the provisions of
the Companies Act, 2013?
3. Mr Nilesh has transferred 1000 shares of Perfect Ltd. to Ms. Mukta. The company has
refused to register transfer of shares and does not even send a notice of refusal to Mr.
Nilesh or Ms. Mukta respectively within the prescribed period. Discuss as per the
provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, whether aggrieved party has any right(s) against
the company for such refusal?
4. The Director of Happy Limited proposed dividend at 12% on equity shares for the financial
year 2016-17. The same was approved in the annual general meeting of the company held
on 20th September, 2017. The Directors declared the approved dividends. Analysing the
provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, give your opinion on the following matters:
(i) Mr. A, holding equity shares of face value of ` 10 lakhs has not paid an amount of `
1 lakh towards call money on shares. Can the same be adjusted against the dividend
amount payable to him?
(ii) Ms. N was the holder of 1,000 equity shares on 31st March, 2017, but she has
transferred the shares to Mr. R, whose name has been registered on 20th May, 2017.
Who will be entitled to the above dividend?
5. Tirupati Limited, a listed company has made the following profits, the profits reflect eligible
profits under the relevant section of the Companies Act, 2013.
Financial year Amount (` In crores)
2012-13 20
2013-14 40
2014-15 30
2015-16 70
2016-17 50
(i) Calculate the amount that the company has to spend towards CSR for the financial
year 2017-18.
(ii) State the composition of the CSR committee unlisted company and a private
company.
6. Kavish Ltd., desirous of buying back of all its equity shares from the existing shareholders
of the company, seeks your advice. Examining the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013
discuss whether the above buy back of equity shares by the company is possible. Also ,
state the sources out of which buy-back of shares can be financed?
7. Altar Limited has on its Board, four Directors viz. W, X, Y and Z. In addition, the company
has Mr. D as the Managing Director. The company also has a full time Company Secretary,
Mr. Wise, on its rolls. The financial statements of the company for the year ended 31st
March, 2017 were authenticated by two of the directors, Mr. X and Y under their signatures.
Referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013:
(i) Examine the validity of the authentication of the Balance Sheet and Statement of
Profit & Loss and the Board’s Report.
(ii) What would be your answer in case the company is a One Person Company (OPC)
and has only one Director, who has authenticated the Balance Sheet and Statement
of Profit & Loss and the Board’s Report?
8. (a) A company issued a prospectus. All the statements contained therein were literally
true. It also stated that the company had paid dividends for a number of years, but
did not disclose the fact that the dividends were not paid out of trading profits, but out
of capital profits. An allottee of shares wants to avoid the contract on the ground that
the prospectus was false in material particulars. Discuss can he do so?
(b) Mr Akshat entered into an agreement for purchasing a commercial property in Delhi
belonging to NRT Ltd. At the time of registration, Mr Akshat comes to know that the
title deed of the company is not free and the company expresses its inability to get
the title deed transferred in the name of Mr Akshat saying that he ought to have had
the knowledge of charge created on the property of the company. Examine with the
help of ‘Notice of a charge’, whether the contention of NRT LTD. is correct?
9. Kapoor Builders Limited decides to pay 2.5 percent of the value of debentures as
underwriting commission to the underwriters but the Articles of the company authorize only
2.0 percent underwriting commission on debentures. The company further decides to pay
the underwriting commission in the form of flats. Examine the validity of the above
arrangements under the provisions of the Companies Act,2013.
10. Explain how the auditor will be appointed in the following cases:
(i) A Government Company within the meaning of section 394 of the Companies Act,
2013.
(ii) The Auditor of the company (other than government company) has resigned on 31 st
December, 2016, while the Financial year of the company ends on 31 st March, 2017.
OTHER LAWS
The Indian Contract Act, 1872
11. (a) R instructed S, a transporter, to send a consignment of apples to Chennai. After
covering half the distance, Suresh found that the apples will perish before reaching
Chennai. He sold the same at half the market price. R sued S. Decide will he
succeed?
(b) Ramesh hires a carriage of Suresh and agrees to pay ` 1500 as hire charges. The
carriage is unsafe, though Suresh is unaware of it. Ramesh is injured and claims
compensation for injuries suffered by him. Suresh refuses to pay. Discuss the liability
of Suresh.
12. Mr. A of Delhi engaged Mr. S as his agent to buy a house in Noida Extension area. Mr. S
bought a house for ` 50 lakhs in the name of a nominee and then purchased it himself for
` 60 lakhs. He then sold the same house to Mr. A for ` 80 lakhs. Mr. A later comes to
know the mischief of Mr. S and tries to recover the excess amount paid to Mr. S. Discuss
whether he is entitled to recover any amount from Mr. S? If so, how much?
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
13. ‘E’ is the holder of a bill of exchange made payable to the order of ‘F’. The bill of exchange
contains the following endorsements in blank:
First endorsement ‘F’
Second endorsement ‘G’.
Third endorsement ‘H’ and
SUGGESTED ANSWERS/HINTS
1. In terms of section 2 (87) of the Companies Act 2013 "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary",
in relation to any other company (that is to say the holding company), means a company
in which the holding company—
(i) controls the composition of the Board of Directors; or
(ii) exercises or controls more than one-half of the total share capital either at its own or
together with one or more of its subsidiary companies:
Provided that such class or classes of holding companies as may be prescribed shall not
have layers of subsidiaries beyond such numbers as may be prescribed.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this clause,—
(a) a company shall be deemed to be a subsidiary company of the holding company even
if the control referred to in sub-clause (i) or sub-clause (ii) is of another subsidiary
company of the holding company;
(b) the composition of a company's Board of Directors shall be deemed to be controlled
by another company if that other company by exercise of some power exercisable by
it at its discretion can appoint or remove all or a majority of the directors.
In the present case, Jeevan Pvt. Ltd. and Sudhir Pvt. Ltd. together hold less than one half
of the total share capital. Hence, Piyush Private Ltd. (holding of Jeevan Pvt. Ltd. and Sudhir
Pvt) will not be a holding company of Saras Pvt. Ltd.
However, if Piyush Pvt. Ltd. has 8 out of 9 Directors on the Board of Saras Pvt. Ltd. i.e.
controls the composition of the Board of Directors; it (Piyush Pvt. Ltd.) will be treated as
the holding company of Saras Pvt. Ltd.
2. Under Section 118 (5) of the Companies Act, 2013, there shall not be included in the
Minutes of a meeting, any matter which, in the opinion of the Chairman of the meeting:
(i) is or could reasonably be regarded as defamatory of any person;
(ii) is irrelevant or immaterial to the proceeding; or
(iii) is detrimental to the interests of the company;
Further, under section 118(6) the chairman shall exercise absolute discretion in regard to
the inclusion or non-inclusion of any matter in the Minutes on the grounds specified in sub-
section (5) above.
Hence, in view of the above, the contention of Manoj, a shareholder of Amit Limited is not
valid because the Chairman has absolute discretion on the inclusion or exclusion of any
matter in the minutes for aforesaid reasons.
3. The problem as asked in the question is governed by Section 58 of the Companies Act,
2013 dealing with the refusal to register transfer and appeal against refusal.
In the present case the company has committed the wrongful act of not sending the notice
of refusal of registering the transfer of shares.
Under section 58 (4), if a public company without sufficient cause refuses to register the
transfer of securities within a period of thirty days from the date on which the instrument of
transfer is delivered to the company, the transferee may, within a period of sixty days of
such refusal or where no intimation has been received from the company, within ninety
days of the delivery of the instrument of transfer, appeal to the Tribunal.
Section 58 (5) further provides that the Tribunal, while dealing with an appeal made under
sub-section (4), may, after hearing the parties, either dismiss the appeal, or by order —
(a) direct that the transfer or transmission shall be registered by the company and the
company shall comply with such order within a period of ten days of the receipt of the
order; or
(b) direct rectification of the register and also direct the company to pay damages, if any,
sustained by any party aggrieved;
In the present case Ms. Mukta can make an appeal before the tribunal and claim damages.
4. (i) The given problem is based on the proviso provided in the section 127 (d) of the
Companies Act, 2013. As per the law where the dividend is declared by a company
and there remains calls in arrears and any other sum due from a member, in such
case no offence shall be deemed to have been committed where the dividend has
been lawfully adjusted by the company against any sum due to it from the
shareholder.
As per the facts given in the question, Mr. A is holding equity shares of face value of
` 10 Lakhs and has not paid an amount of ` 1 lakh towards call money on shares.
Referring to the above provision, Mr. A is eligible to get ` 1.20 lakh towards dividend,
out of which an amount of ` 1 lakh can be adjusted towards call money due on his
shares. ` 20,000 can be paid to him in cash or by cheque or in any electronic mode.
According to the above mentioned provision, company can adjust sum of ` 1 lakh due
towards call money on shares against the dividend amount payable to
Mr. A.
(ii) According to section 123(5), dividend shall be payable only to the registered
shareholder of the share or to his order or to his banker. Facts in the given case state
that Ms. N, the holder of equity shares transferred the shares to Mr. R whose name
has been registered on 20 th May 2017. Since, he became the registered shareholder
before the declaration of the dividend in the Annual general meeting of the company
held on 20 th September 2017, so, Mr. Raj will be entitled to the dividend.
5. Section 135 read with Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014 of
the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the provisions related to the Corporate Social
Responsibility.
As per the given facts, following are the answers in the given situations -
(i) Amount that Company has to spend towards CSR: According to section 135 of
the Companies Act, 2013, the Board of every company shall ensure that the company
spends, in every financial year, at least two per cent of the average net profits of the
company made during the three immediately preceding financial years, in pursuance
of its CSR Policy.
Accordingly, net profits of Tirupati Ltd. for three immediately preceding financial years
is 150 crores (30+70+50) and 2% of the average net profits of the company made
during these three immediately preceding financial years will constitute 1 crore, can
be spent towards CSR in financial year 2017-2018.
(ii) Composition of CSR Committee: The CSR Committee shall be consisting of 3 or
more directors, out of which at least one director shall be an independent director.
(a) an unlisted public company or a private company covered under section
135(1) which is not required to appoint an independent director, shall have its
CSR Committee without such director;
(b) a private company having only two directors on its Board shall constitute its CSR
Committee with two such directors;
6. In terms of section 68 (2) (c) of the Companies Act, 2013 a company is allowed to buy back
a maximum of 25% of the aggregate of its paid- up capital and free reserves. Hence, the
company in the given case is not allowed to buy back its entire equity shares.
Section 68 (1) of the Companies Act, 2013 specifies the sources of funding buy back of its
shares and other specified securities as under:
(a) Free reserves or
(b) Security Premium account or
Thus, the section clarifies that if any person acquires a property, assets or
undertaking for which a charge is already registered, it would be deemed that he has
complete knowledge of charge from the date the charge is registered.
Thus, the contention of NRT Ltd. is correct
9. Section 40 (6) of the Companies Act 2013, provides that a company may pay commission
to any person in connection with the subscription or procurement of subscription to its
securities, whether absolute or conditional, subject to a number of conditions which are
prescribed under Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014. In
relation to the case given, the conditions applicable under the above Rules are as under:
(a) The payment of such commission shall be authorized in the company’s articles of
association;
(b) The commission may be paid out of proceeds of the issue or the profit of the company
or both;
(c) The rate of commission paid or agreed to be paid shall not exceed, in case of shares,
five percent (5%) of the price at which the shares are issued or a rate authorised by
the articles, whichever is less, and in case of debentures, shall not exceed two and a
half per cent (2.5 %) of the price at which the debentures are issued, or as specified
in the company’s articles, whichever is less;
Thus, the Underwriting commission is limited to 5% of issue price in case of shares and
2.5% in case of debentures. The rates of commission given above are maximum rates.
In view of the above, the decision of Kapoor Builders Ltd. to pay underwriting commission
exceeding 2% as prescribed in the Articles is invalid.
The company may pay the underwriting commission in the form of flats as both the
Companies Act and the Rules do not impose any restriction on the mode of payment
though the source has been restricted to either the proceeds of the issue or profits of the
company.
10. (i) The appointment and re-appointment of auditor of a Government Company or a
government controlled company is governed by the provisions of section 139 of the
Companies Act, 2013 which are summarized as under:
The first auditor shall be appointed by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India
within 60 days from the date of incorporation and in case of failure to do so, the Board
shall appoint auditor within next 30 days and on failure to do so by Board of Directors,
it shall inform the members, who shall appoint the auditor within 60 days at an
extraordinary general meeting (EGM), such auditor shall hold office till conclusion of
first Annual General Meeting.
In case of subsequent auditor for existing government companies, the Comptroller &
Auditor General of India shall appoint the auditor within a period of 180 days from the
commencement of the financial year and the auditor so appointed shall hold his
position till the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting.
(ii) The situation as stated in the question relates to the creation of a casual vacancy in
the office of an auditor due to resignation of the auditor before the AGM in case of a
company other government company. Under section 139 (8)(i) any casual vacancy in
the office of an auditor arising as a result of his resignation, such vacancy can be
filled by the Board of Directors within thirty days thereof and in addition the
appointment of the new auditor shall also be approved by the company at a general
meeting convened within three months of the recommendation of the Board and he
shall hold the office till the conclusion of the next annual general meeting.
11. (a) An agent has the authority in an emergency to do all such acts as a man of ordinary
prudence would do for protecting his principal from losses which the principal would
have done under similar circumstances.
A typical case is where the ‘agent’ handling perishable goods like ‘apples’ can decide
the time, date and place of sale, not necessarily as per instructions of the principal,
with the intention of protecting the principal from losses. Here, the agent acts in an
emergency and acts as a man of ordinary prudence. In the given case S had acted in
an emergency situation and hence, R will not succeed against him.
(b) Problem asked in the question is based on the provisions of the Indian Contract Act,
1872 as contained in Section 150. The section provides that if the goods are bailed
for hire, the bailor is responsible for such damage, whether he was or was not aware
of the existence of such faults in the goods bailed. Accordingly, applying the abov e
provisions in the given case Suresh is responsible to compensate Ramesh for the
injuries sustained even if he was not aware of the defect in the carriage.
12. The problem in this case, is based on the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 as
contained in Section 215 read with Section 216. The two sections provide that where an
agent without the knowledge of the principal, deals in the business of agency on h is own
account, the principal may:
(1) repudiate the transaction, if the case shows, either that the agent has dishonestly
concealed any material fact from him, or that the dealings of the agent have been
disadvantageous to him.
(2) claim from the agent any benefit, which may have resulted to him from the transaction.
Therefore, based on the above provisions, Mr. A is entitled to recover ` 30 lakhs from Mr.
S being the amount of profit earned by Mr. S out of the transaction.
13. According to section 40 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, where the holder of a
negotiable instrument, without the consent of the endorser, destroys or impairs the
endorser’s remedy against a prior party, the endorser is discharged from liability to the
holder to the same extent as if the instrument had been paid at maturity. Any party liable
on the instrument may be discharged by the intentional cancellation of his signature by the
holder.
In the given question, E is the holder of a bill of exchange of which F is the paye e and it
contains the following endorsement in blank:
First endorsement, ‘F’
Second endorsement, ‘G’
Third endorsement, ‘H’
Fourth endorsement, ‘I’
‘E’, the holder, may intentionally strike out the endorsement by ‘G’ and ‘H’; in that case the
liability of ‘G’ and ‘H’ upon the bill will come to an end. But if the endorsements of ‘G’ and
‘H’ are struck out without the consent of ‘I’, ‘E’ will not be entitled to recover anything from
‘I’. The reason being that as between ‘H’ and ‘I’, ‘H’ is the principal debtor and ‘I’ is surety.
If ‘H’ is released by the holder under Section 39 of the Act, ‘I’, being surety, will be
discharged. Hence, when the holder without the consent of the endorser impairs the
endorser’s remedy against a prior party, the endorser is discharged from liability to the
holder.
Thus, if ‘E’ strikes out, without I’s consent, the endorsements by ‘G’ and ‘H’, ‘I’ will also be
discharged.
14. As per the provisions of Section 27 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, where any legislation
or regulation requires any document to be served by post, then unless a different intention
appears, the service shall be deemed to be effected by:
1. properly addressing,
2. pre-paying, and
3. posting by registered post.
A letter containing the document to have been effected at the time at which the letter would
be delivered in the ordinary course of post.
Therefore, in view of the above provision, since, the statutory rules itself provides about
the service of notice that a notice when required under said statutory rules to be sent by
‘registered post acknowledgement due’, then, if notice was sent by ‘registered post’ only it
will not be the compliance of said rules. However, if such provision was not provided by
such statutory rules, then service of notice if by registered post only shall be deemed to be
effected.
Furthermore, in similar case of In United Commercial Bank v. Bhim Sain Makhija, AIR 1994
Del 181: A notice when required under the statutory rules to be sent by ‘registered post
acknowledgement due’ is instead sent by ‘registered post’ only, the protection of
presumption regarding serving of notice under ‘registered post’ under this section of the
Act neither tenable not based upon sound exposition of law.
15. Proviso: The normal function of a proviso is to except something out of the enactment or
to qualify something stated in the enactment which would be within its purview if the proviso
were not there. The effect of the proviso is to qualify the preceding enactment which is
expressed in terms which are too general. As a general rule, a proviso is added to an
enactment to qualify or create an exception to what is in the enactment. Ordinarily a proviso
is not interpreted as stating a general rule.
It is a cardinal rule of interpretation that a proviso to a particular provision of a statute only
embraces the field which is covered by the main provision. It carves out an exception to
the main provision to which it has been enacted as a proviso and to no other. (Ram Narain
Sons Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, AIR 1955 SC 765).
Distinction between Proviso, exception and saving Clause
There is said to exist difference between provisions worded as ‘Proviso’, ’Exception’, or
‘Saving Clause’.
Proviso Exception Saving Clause
Exception’ is intended to ‘Proviso’ is used to remove ‘Saving clause’ is used to
restrain the enacting special cases from general preserve from destruction
clause to particular enactment and provide for certain rights, remedies or
cases them specially privileges already existing