COT-RPMS

TEACHER I-III

RATING SHEET
OBSERVER: DATE:

TEACHER OBSERVED: QUARTER:

SUBJECT & GRADE LEVEL TAUGHT:

OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
DIRECTIONS FOR THE OBSERVERS:
1. Rate each item on the checklist according to how well the teacher performed during the classroom observation. Mark the appropriate
column with a (✓) symbol.
2. Each indicator is assessed on an individual basis, regardless of its relationship to other indicators.
3. For schools with only one observer, this form will serve as the final rating sheet.

INDICATORS 3 4 5 6 7 NO*

1. Applied knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas

2. Used a range of teaching strategies that enhance learner achievement in literacy and
numeracy skills

3. Applied a range of teaching strategies to develop critical and creative thinking, as well as
other higher-order thinking skills.
4. Managed classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in groups, in meaningful
exploration, discovery and hands-on activities within a range of physical learning
environments.
5. Managed learner behavior constructively by applying positive and non-violent
discipline to ensure learning-focused environments.
6. Used differentiated, developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address
learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences
7. Planned, managed and implemented developmentally sequenced teaching and
learning processes to meet curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts

8. Selected, developed, organized, and used appropriate teaching and learning

resources, including ICT, to address learning goals
9. Designed, selected, organized, and used diagnostic, formative and summative
assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements

OTHER COMMENTS:

* NO stands for Not Observed which automatically gets a rating of 3.

Signature over Printed Name of the Observer

Signature over Printed Name of the Teacher

This tool was developed through the Philippine National

S.Y. 2023-2024 | Proficient Teacher Research Center for Teacher Quality (RCTQ) with support from
the Australian Government
 COT-RPMS
MASTER TEACHER I-IV

RATING SHEET
OBSERVER: DATE:

TEACHER OBSERVED: QUARTER:

SUBJECT & GRADE LEVEL TAUGHT:

OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
DIRECTIONS FOR THE OBSERVERS:
1. Rate each item on the checklist according to how well the teacher performed during the classroom observation. Mark the appropriate
column with a (✓) symbol.
2. Each indicator is assessed on an individual basis, regardless of its relationship to other indicators.
3. For schools with only one observer, this form will serve as the final rating sheet.

INDICATORS 4 5 6 7 8 NO*

1. Modeled effective applications of content knowledge within and across curriculum

teaching areas.
2. Developed and applied effective teaching strategies to promote critical and creative
thinking, as well as other higher-order thinking skills.

3. Worked with colleagues to model and shared effective techniques in the management of
classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in groups, in meaningful
exploration, discovery and hands-on activities within a range of physical learning
environments.
4. Exhibited effective and constructive behavior management skills by applying a
positive and non-violent discipline to ensure learning-focused environments.
5. Worked with colleagues to share differentiated, developmentally appropriate
learning experiences to address learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests
and experiences.
6. Developed and applied effective strategies in the planning and management
of developmentally sequenced teaching and learning processes to meet
curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts.

OTHER COMMENTS:

* NO stands for Not Observed which automatically gets a rating of 4.

Signature over Printed Name of the Observer Signature over Printed Name of the Teacher

This tool was developed through the Philippine National

S.Y. 2022-2023 | Highly Proficient Teacher Research Center for Teacher Quality (RCTQ) with support from
the Australian Government
 2

COT-RPMS
TEACHER I-III

INTER-OBSERVER AGREEMENT FORM

OBSERVER 1: NAME OF TEACHER OBSERVED:

OBSERVER 2:

OBSERVER 3: SUBJECT & GRADE LEVEL TAUGHT:

DATE:

OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
DIRECTIONS FOR THE OBSERVERS:

Discuss with the other observers your reason/s for rating in each indicator. In case of different ratings, come up with a final rating. The final
rating is NOT an average; it is a rating based on a reasoned and consensual judgment. Indicate this rating on the column for Final Rating.

Note that if the Ratee gets NO (Not Observed) in an indicator, write 3 as the Final Rating.

FINAL
INDICATORS
RATING

1. Applied knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas

2. Used a range of teaching strategies that enhance learner achievement in literacy and numeracy skills
3. Applied a range of teaching strategies to develop critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher-order thinking
skills.
4. Managed classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in groups, in meaningful exploration,
discovery and hands-on activities within a range of physical learning environments.
5. Managed learner behavior constructively by applying positive and non-violent discipline to ensure learning-
focused environments.
6. Used differentiated, developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address learners’ gender, needs,
strengths, interests and experiences
7. Planned, managed and implemented developmentally sequenced teaching and learning processes to meet
curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts
8. Selected, developed, organized, and used appropriate teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to address
learning goals

9. Designed, selected, organized, and used diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with
curriculum requirements.
OTHER COMMENTS

Signature over Printed Name of Signature over Printed Name of Signature over Printed Name of
Observer 1 Observer 2 Observer 3

Signature over Printed Name of the Teacher

This tool was developed through the Philippine National

S.Y. 2022-2023| Proficient Teacher Research Center for Teacher Quality (RCTQ) with support from
the Australian Government
 COT-RPMS
MASTER TEACHER I-IV

INTER-OBSERVER AGREEMENT FORM

OBSERVER 1: NAME OF TEACHER OBSERVED:

OBSERVER 2:

OBSERVER 3: SUBJECT & GRADE LEVEL TAUGHT:

DATE:

OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
DIRECTIONS FOR THE OBSERVERS:

Discuss with the other observers your reason/s for rating in each indicator. In case of different ratings, come up with a final rating. The final
rating is NOT an average; it is a rating based on a reasoned and consensual judgment. Indicate this rating on the column for Final Rating.

Note that if the Ratee gets NO (Not Observed) in an indicator, write 4 as the Final Rating.

INDICATORS FINAL
RATING

1. Modeled effective applications of content knowledge within and across curriculum teaching areas.

2. Developed and applied effective teaching strategies to promote critical and creative thinking, as well as other
higher-order thinking skills.

3. Worked with colleagues to model and shared effective techniques in the management of classroom structure to
engage learners, individually or in groups, in meaningful exploration, discovery and hands-on activities within a
range of physical learning environments.
4. Exhibited effective and constructive behavior management skills by applying a positive and non-violent discipline
to ensure learning-focused environments.
5. Worked with colleagues to share differentiated, developmentally appropriate learning experiences to
address learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences.

6. Developed and applied effective strategies in the planning and management of developmentally
sequenced teaching and learning processes to meet curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts.

OTHER COMMENTS:

Signature over Printed Name of Signature over Printed Name of Signature over Printed Name of
Observer 1 Observer 2 Observer3

Signature over Printed Name of the Teacher

S.Y. 2022-2023 | Highly Proficient Teacher This tool was developed through the Philippine National
Research Center for Teacher Quality (RCTQ) with support from
the Australian Government