Tasik Kenyir
Tasik Kenyir
Tasik Kenyir
Full Paper
Teknologi
WATER QUALITY ISSUES IN WATER RESOURCES Article history
Received
MANAGEMENT AT KENYIR LAKE, MALAYSIA Received in revised form
Accepted
Mohd Khairul Amri Kamarudina,b, Noorjima Abd Wahabb,
Nurhanis Afiqah Abd Jalila, Sunardic, M. Hafiz Md. Saadab *Corresponding author
mkhairulamri@unisza.edu.my
aFaculty
Provide an official organisation email of
of Applied Social Science, Universiti Sultan Zainal the corresponding author
Abidin, Gong Badak Campus, 21300 Terengganu, Malaysia
bEast Coast Environmental Research Institute, Universiti Sultan
Abstrak
Pengurusan sumber air di Malaysia adalah aspek yang paling penting yang perlu ditangani.
Apabila pengurusan sumber air dapat diuruskan secara sistematik dan berkesan, ia dapat
menghasilkan sumber air yang berkualiti dan bersih tanpa pencemaran. Objektif kajian ini
adalah untuk mengkaji isu kualiti air di Lembah Tasik Kenyir dan mengenalpasti hubungan
antara luahan sungai (Q) dan status kualiti air di Lembangan Tasik Kenyir. Enam parameter
kualiti air dianalisis berdasarkan analisis in-situ dan ex-situ dan analisis makmal dijalankan
mengikut matriks korelasi dan kaedah regresi linear. Menurut NWQS, kualiti air di Lembangan
Tasik Kenyir berubah-ubah secara temporal dan spatial serta parameter paling terjejas
adalah pH, DO, BOD, COD, TSS dan AN. Selain itu, kelas kualiti air di Lembangan Tasik Kenyir
diklasifikasikan di bawah kelas II yang disebabkan oleh aktiviti penggunaan tanah secara
aktif terutamanya sektor pelancongan tetapi ia masih sesuai untuk aktiviti rekreasi dan
selamat untuk sentuhan badan kerana nilai WQI tersebut tidak kurang daripada 65% yang
peringkat awal Kelas II. Berdasarkan kajian ini, terdapat beberapa langkah mitigasi dalam
pengurusan sumber air seperti jaminan bekalan air bersih secara berterusan, melaksanakan
beberapa akta berkaitan alam sekitar, merawat sumber air, membangun sumber air
alternatif dan memperbaiki sistem pengedaran dan pengurusan air.
Kata kunci: Pengurusan sumber air, pencemaran, akta alam sekitar, langkah mitigasi
© 2019 Penerbit UTM Press. All rights reserved
Water pollution can be divided into two main assets [30]. It is to boost the social welfare and resultant
categories, which are point sources and non point financial in an impartial way without bargaining the
sources pollution. The source of pollution points can be manageability of imperious environments. In the most
interpreted as any identified sources of contamination recent decade, the assessment of water-quality
that are directly released, such as pipes, drains, vessels administration related with the standard of
or processing factories [27]. For example, processing maintainable improvement has been of worry to
factories include oil refineries, factories, chemical numerous scientists and chiefs. It requires not just the
factories and electronics plants that cause pollution support of built up standards and innovations but in
through oil, heat pollution, chemicals, toxic and additionally their expansion to substantially more high,
sewage treatment plants such as waste from factories extensive, and more liberated degree for the
and sewage treatment plants as waste products and acknowledgment of supportability for the water quality
treated wastes will be released into rivers that can administration [31-33]. Although, the current
cause bacterial and nutrient growth and cause circumstance of water quality administration on the
polluted water sources [28]. Meanwhile, the non point planet is an extensive way from agreeable. It is
sources pollutionoccurs from a stream. When rain or because of the weights of expanding populace and
snowflakes are flowing on the surface of the earth and financial improvement [34-42].
through the soil, clean water will absorb and mix with Since 2007, the Department of Environment (DOE)
any contaminants when mixed [29]. For example, has been observing the water quality. Based on the
sources of non point sources pollutioncan be caused National Water Quality Standard (NWQS) and WQI, the
by contaminants from construction sites or from Department of Environment (DOE) has classified lakes
unprocessed industrial. into a few classes such as class I, II, III, IV and V. To
The huge numbers of the water issues were become measure the quality of water and detect the water
very complex, interrelated and extensive to be pollution, it is one of the indicator that can be used
handled by any single establishment, independent of (Table 2).Based on 6 significant pollutants, the WQI
the specialist and assets given to it, specialized ability parameters measured which is Dissolved Oxygen (DO),
and administration limit accessible, level of political Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Chemical
help, and all the great aims. The definition that was Oxygen Demand (COD), Ammoniacal Nitrogen (AN),
planned by the Global Water Partnership (2000), which Total Suspended Solid (TSS) and pH [16,43].
considered it as a procedure of the administration of
water, organized improvement, arrive and related
Parameter Class
Unit I II III IV V
PH - >7 6–7 5-6 <5 >5
DO mg/L >7 5 -7 3-5 1-3 <1
BOD mg/L <1 1–3 3-6 6 - 12 >12
COD mg/L <10 10 – 25 25 - 50 50 - 100 >100
TSS mg/L <25 25 – 30 50 - 150 150 - 300 >300
AN mg/L <0.1 0.1 – 0.3 0.3 – 0.9 0.9 – 2.7 >2.7
Water Quality Index (WQI) (%) <92.7 76.5 - 92.7 51.9 - 76.5 31.0 - 51.9 >31.0
Source: Department of Environment (DOE)
the need for long term involvement of relevant lake protecting them and making informed policy decisions
basin management institutions and their activities. The about land use planning and natural resource
potential for long term impacts also suggest a need for extraction. Figure 1 showed the map location of study
a precautionary approach in developing and areas.
implementing lake management interventions. The
collaborative research to understand the levels of
resilience of such specialized environments is critical to
Figure 1 Map of Sampling Location at Kenyir Lake Basin, Hulu Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia
2.2 Research and Methodology increase because the higher flow contains the strong
energy to move the higher concentrated the
Water Quality Parameter and Hydrological Analysis suspended sediment load compared to the low flow
level and the high water flow also increased the rate of
All the sample preparation and preservations erosion. TSS is also to determine whether the status of
conducted were following on the standard procedures water quality clean, moderately polluted or
provided by American Public Health Association contaminated and to estimate the suspended
(APHA) and United States Environmental Protection sediment load production in the Sungai Terengganu,
Agency (USEPA) Methods [16,44]. There six significant TSS is an indicator to classify the river in Class I, II, III, IV or
parameters of water quality index based on National Class V, based on NWQS. The highest amount of TSS at
Water Quality Standard (NWQS) such as Dissolved Sungai Lepar and Sungai Cenana recorded 18 mg/L
Oxygen (DO), Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), respectively. The minimum level amount of TSS at
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Ammoniacal Sungai Besar, 4.4 mg/L during dry season. The value of
Nitrogen (NH3-N), Total Suspended Solid (TSS) and pH. TSS on dry season showed higher range compared wet
Besides that, the laboratory analysis was performed season where affected by climate changes and
based on the standard method of analysis (APHA 1998) anthropogenic factors, the TSS amount for all sampling
procedure. stations were recorded 4.4 mg/L ± 18.00 mg/L during
dry season and 1.6 mg/L ± 15.00 mg/L during wet
Statistical Analysis season. From the result, the difference amount level of
TSS at Kenyir Lake Basin where affected by the
The data gathered from the survey were coded and anthropogenic and geomorphology factors, climate
analysed using XLStat2014 licensed software for changes and hydrological cycle. This study proved the
Microsoft Excel. The numerical data analysing using wet season (higher density of rainfall) caused the
experimental studies and the data obtained are higher level of soil loss. From Department of
analysed by statistical test [14]. The statistical analysis Environment (DOE) 2000 stated the WQI Class of Kenyir
method applied in this study such as Leave one out Lake Basin for TSS in class II during wets season, the river
method based on regression analysis. Leave-one-out water needs to be treated and still suitable to protect
method or input importance were also performed to aquatic species and recreational activities. The
identify the most and the least significant (p<0.05) concentration of NH3-N varied from 0.02 until 1.01 mg
variables as due to linear correlation between input- N/L (wet season) [17].
output. In general, higher concentrations of NH3-N were
recorded at the middle and lower parts of the basin in
comparison with the upper basin stations especially
3.0 RESULT AND DISCUSSION during wet season. The production of NH3-N caused by
the fertilizers from agricultural areas around the outlet
of Kenyir Lake Basin (Terengganu River). Figure 4
Difference Analysis of Six Parameters by Wet and Dry showed the range values of DO in wet season as a
Season minimum value of 3.84 mg/L and maximum value as
8.15 mg/L while during dry season showed the minimum
Based on this study, Figure 3 showed the COD, BOD, TSS value as 5.37 mg/L to the maximum value as 8.53 mg/L.
and NH3-N values in mg/L based on wet and dry Figure 5 shows the pH value based on wet and dry
seasons in the Kenyir Lake Basin. The range values of seasons in the Kenyir Lake Basin. Results of pH value
COD from 2 mg/L to 6 mg/L during wet season and analysis performed in the dry season showed a
from 1 mg/L to 10 mg/L during dry season. The minimum value of 7.6 to a maximum value of 8.6.
maximum value of COD recorded in dry season as 10 Meanwhile, the measurement results in the wet season
mg/L (Station 16) higher than the maximum value from 5.32 to the maximum value of 7.7. From the result,
recorded in wet season. Besides that, the maximum the trend of deteriorating water quality at Kenyir Lake
values of COD in wet seasons at Station 3, Station 8 and Basin going from the upstream to the downstream
Station 18 as 6 mg/L and the minimum value at Station stations. The main contributor of water quality
11 as 2 mg/L. The BOD values analysis recorded the parameters in Terengganu River Basin especially at
minimum and maximum value as 0.85 mg/L and 1.40 downstream and middle stream area are COD and
mg/L respectively during wet season. While during dry TSS. This is probably due to the discharge of untreated
season showed the minimum and maximum values as municipal, tourism, construction and domestic waste
0.31 mg/L and 0.51 mg/L respectively. The density of into the lake systems as these stations are situated
water at forest canopy is the main role towards within the heavily populated areas of Kuala Berang
reducing the surface erosion which contributes to and a few villages around the Kenyir Lake Basin [16, 45-
sediment load production in river basin [4]. When the 47].
water flow in a basin increased, the TSS will also
6 Zakiyyah, Tukimat, Razi, Zulfahmi, Muzzneena & Sahibin / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering) 78:1 (2016) 1–5
Figure 3 Variation of COD, BOD, TSS and NH3-N values for the different sampling stations at Kenyir Lake Basin
Figure 4 DO values in mg / L based on dry season and wet season at Kenyir Lake Basin
Figure 5 pH value based on wet and dry seasons in the Kenyir Lake Basin
Water Quality Index (WQI) quality of water. It is calculated from the point of view
of human consumption. From the a few preliminary
Water quality index (WQI) is defined as a technique of water quality level studies in Kenyir Lake Basin proved
rating that provides the composite influence of there are high values of BOD, COD, TSS and NH3-N at
individual water quality parameter on the overall middle and downstream areas as compared with the
7 Zakiyyah, Tukimat, Razi, Zulfahmi, Muzzneena & Sahibin / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering) 78:1 (2016) 1–5
upstream of the lake basin. The reverses were true for the DOE-WQI calculation (Figure 6), the water of the
the pH and DO values. Kenyir Lake Basin (upstream until downstream) was
This study adopted the DOE-WQI tool to classified as Class II (polluted) but all stations showed
evaluate the water quality of the Kenyir Lake where WQI level not below than 60% which is suitable for
affected by hydrological characteristic and possible recreational activities where body contact still safe.
sources from anthropogenic activities. In addition, the However, there are an extensive treatment required.
beneficial use of the water was also compared with The management and control approach
the classification based on the NWQS. Water Quality must be conducted to improve these problems
Classification Based on DOE-WQI and NWQS for before these issues become more serious as one of
Malaysia (DOE 2008) [48]. WQI is defined as a the conservation methods. Low water quality was
technique of rating that provides the composite found at the downstream and middle stream stations
influence of individual water quality parameter on the which around tourism and residential areas.
overall quality of water [16, 49-50]. It is calculated from
the point of view of human consumption. Based on
Figure 6 The Distribution of WQI at Kenyir Lake Basin during Wet Season and Dry season
Leave one out method The main contributor parameter in Kenyir Lake Basin
especially at downstream and middle stream area
Leave-one-out method or input importance were also are COD and TSS. This is probably due to the
performed to identify the most and the least discharge of untreated municipal, industrial and
significant (p<0.05) variables as due to linear agricultural wastes into the river systems as these
correlation between input-output. Table 3 and Table 4 stations are situated within the heavily populated
showed the input importance variables in linear areas of Kuala Berang and a few villages around
relationship to predict WQI on Wet Season and Dry Kenyir Lake Basin. In addition, a small amount of
Season at Kenyir Basin. During wet season, the aquaculture activities near the downstream stations
percent contribution of DO, BOD, COD and TSS influenced the results. Studies showed the wastes from
(21.95%) which are highest than others contributors. these activities were characterized by high organic
However, the percentage of DO (53.11%), COD content leading to low pH, low DO and high NH3-N
(20.36%) and pH (20.20%) highest contributed than and TSS values as a result of the decomposition
others parameter during dry season. From the result, processes.
the trend of deteriorating water quality at Kenyir Lake
going from the upstream to the downstream stations.
8 Zakiyyah, Tukimat, Razi, Zulfahmi, Muzzneena & Sahibin / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering) 78:1 (2016) 1–5
Table 3: An important variable in linear relationships to predict WQI in the wet season at Kenyir Lake Basin
The Water Resources Management development. These policies describe ultimate goals
to reconcile economic growth with environmental
There are many water resource management protection to achieve the sustainable environmental
procedures in Malaysia. First, the measures of management. To achieve the targeted water quality
sustainable water resources management is certain policy changes following the law and the
guarantee clean water supply and continuous. The imperative cooperation of various government
developed commercially, in particular capacity and departments and agencies including but not
distribution compared to consumer demand, water restricted to local councils, Department of
resource properties that have either fixed or seasonal Environment (DOE), Department of Irrigation and
as well as review of the Environmental Impact Drainage (DID), Ministry of Housing and Local
Assessment (EIA). To ensure continued water supply Government, Department of Forestry, Ministry of
capacity in the long term, the study of hydrological Agriculture and environmental institute [55].
elements of early is very important. If this is not done it The legislative approach in water quality
will make problems cut off water supply will always be management effected by the 1974 Environmental
facing the user. Most of studies reviewed the Quality Act makes use of Section 34A where a report
distribution of rain intensity, input and flow rate of the on impact on the environment resulting from
river, underground water storage, topography, the prescribed activities in EIA requirement is mandatory.
climate and hydrological changes [51-53]. Policy is In this act describe that any activities which are cause
one of the factors in management and protection of water pollution such as recreational development,
water resources. For example, the National and waste treatment, disposal facilities, tourism,
Environment Policy of Malaysia enacted in the Third construction, housing, industry, mining, petroleum,
Malaysia Plan has taken into account the importance power generation and so on. From the Environmental
of maintaining the quality of the environment in order Quality (Sewage and Industrial Effluents) Regulations
to supply good water resources to the population 1979 required that are needed the written permission
especially in the production of agricultural, forestry, be obtained before the construction of any building
fisheries and water resources [54]. These priorities are or carrying out any work that may result in a new
then placed on the governments of each of their source of effluent or discharge [54, 56-57].
respective states to ensure that it can be used to not The uniform discharge standard is applicable
only support national development goals but also to throughout all countries in the world and does not
help sustain the country's ecosystem. In water quality take into account the assimilative capacity of a river
and resources management, a holistic environmental or water body. For the environmental protection,
policy approach is necessary for sustainable there is a need to develop river or stream standards
9 Zakiyyah, Tukimat, Razi, Zulfahmi, Muzzneena & Sahibin / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering) 78:1 (2016) 1–5
Changes Factors on Surface Water Ecosystem the integrated management of surface water quality:
Deterioration at kenyir Lake, Malaysia. International the GIBSI system. Water Science and Technology
Journal of Engineering & Technology 7(3.14):67-74. 36(5):381-387.
[15] Wahab, N. A., Kamarudin, M. K. A., Toriman, M. E., Ata, [34] Biswas, A. K. 1991.Water for sustainable development in
F. M., Juahir, H., Ghazali, A., Anuar, A. 2018. The the 21st century: a global perspective. International
Evaluation of Dissolved Oxygen (DO), Total Suspended Journal of Water Resources Development 7(4):219-224.
Solid (TSS) and Suspended Sediment Concentration [35] Haimes, Y. Y. 1992. Sustainable development: a holistic
(SSC) in Terengganu River, Malaysia. International approach to natural resource management. IEEE
Journal of Engineering & Technology 7(3.14):44-48. Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics
[16] Wahab, N. A., Kamarudin, M. K. A, Toriman, M. E., 22(3):413-417.
Juahir, H., Saad, M. H. M., Ata, F.M., Ghazali, A., Hassan, [36] Plate, E. J. 1993. Sustainable development of water
A. R., Abdullah, H., Maulud, K. N., Hanafiah, M. M., resources: a challenge to science and engineering.
Harith, H. 2019. Sedimentation and water quality Water International 18(2):84-94.
deterioration problems at Terengganu River basin, [37] Simonovic, S. I. 1996. Decision support systems for
Terengganu, Malaysia. Desalination and water sustainable management of water resources: 1.
Treatment 149:28-241. General principles. Water International 21(4):223-232.
[17] Development of Environment (2000). Malaysia [38] Simonovic, S. I. 1996. Decision support systems for
Environmental Quality Report 2000. Kuala Lumpur: sustainable management of water resources: 2. Case
Kementerian Sains, Teknologi dan Alam Sekitar. 107. studies. Water international 21(4):233-244.
[18] Rancangan Eksekutif Rancangan Khas Tasik Kenyir [39] Falkenmark, M. 1997. Society's interaction with the
bagi Tahun 2008 sehingga 2020. water cycle: A conceptual framework for a more
[19] Kamarudin, M. K. A., Toriman, M. E., Wahab, N.A., holistic approach. Hydrological Sciences Journal
Juahir, H., Endut, A., Umar, R., Gasim, M. B. 2017. 42(4):451-466.
Development of Stream Classification System on [40] Loucks, D. P. 1997. Quantifying trends in system
Tropical Areas with Statistical Approval in Pahang River sustainability. Hydrological Sciences Journal 42(4):513-
Basin, Malaysia. Desalination and water Treatment 530.
96:237-254. [41] Kundzewicz, Z. W. 1997. Water resources for sustainable
[20] Gidado, K. A., Kamarudin, M. K. A., Hammad, M., development. Hydrological Sciences Journal 42(4):467-
Ghurah, S. A., Wahab, N. A., Saad, M. H. M. & 480.
Potikengrith, T. 2019. Application of Ca-Markov Model [42] Xia, J. and Takeuchi, K. 1999. Barriers to sustainable
for the Analysis of Urban Growth in Kenyir Basin. management of water quality and quantity.
International Journal of Academic Research in Business Hydrological Science Journal 44:462–474.
and Social Sciences 9(2):449-458. [43] Rashid, S. A. A., Gasim, M. B., Toriman, M. E., Juahir, H.,
[21] Yanmaz, A. M. (2013). Applied water resources Kamarudin, M. K. A., Azid A., Abd Aziz, N. A. 2014.
engineering. Metu Press. Water Quality deterioration of Jinjang River, Kuala
[22] Pahl-Wostl, C. 2007. Transitions towards adaptive Lumpur: Urban risk case water pollution. Arab World
management of water facing climate and global Geographer 16(4):349-362.
change. Water resources management 21(1):49-62. [44] Wang, Q., Li, S., Jia, P., Qi, C., & Ding, F. (2013) ‘A
[23] United Nations. (2014, October 07). Water resources review of surface water quality models’, The Scientific
management. Retrieved November 15, 2015, from World Journal.
http:// www.unwater.org/topics/water-resources- [45] Bordalo, A. A., Nilsumranchit, W., & Chalermwat, K.
management/en/. 2001.Water quality and uses of the Bangpakong River
[24] Kusangaya, S., Warburton, M. L., Van Garderen, E. A., & (Eastern Thailand). Water Research 35(15):3635-3642.
Jewitt, G. P. 2014. Impacts of climate change on water [46] Suratman, S., Ali, A., & Lo, T. T. 2005. Determination of
resources in southern Africa: A review. Physics and water quality index at Ibai River basin, Terengganu.
Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 67:47-54. Sains Malaysiana 34:55-59.
[25] Otterpohl, R., Albold, A., & Oldenburg, M. 1999. Source [47] Suratman, S., Hang, H. C., Shazili, N. A. M., & Tahir, N. M.
control in urban sanitation aVnd waste management: 2009.A preliminary study of the distribution of selected
ten systems with reuse of resources. Water Science and trace metals in the Besut River basin, Terengganu,
Technology 39(5):153-160. Malaysia. Bulletin of environmental contamination and
[26] Baker, B. 1998. Department-Washington Watch: New toxicology 82(1):16-19.
national plan proposed to control pollution of water by [48] Department of Environment (DOE). 2008. Malaysia
livestock waste. BioScience 48:996-1003. Environmental Quality Report. Ministry of Science.
[27] Hill, M.S.1997. Understanding environmental pollution. Technologies and the Environment Malaysia.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 316 pp. [49] Gazzaz, N. M., Yusoff, M. K., Aris, A. Z., Juahir, H., &
[28] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2004). What is Ramli, M. F. 2012. Artificial neural network modeling of
Nonpoint Source (NPS) pollution? Questions and the water quality index for Kinta River (Malaysia) using
answer. Available from: water quality variables as predictors. Marine pollution
http://www.epa.gov/owow/nps/qa.html. bulletin 64(11):2409-2420.
[29] Utah State University Extension (n.d.) (2018). Pollution. [50] Amneera, W. A., Najib, N. W. A. Z., Yusof, S. R. M., &
Available from: Ragunathan, S. 2013. Water quality index of Perlis River,
http://extension.usu.edu/waterquality/htm/whats-in- Malaysia. International Journal of Civil & Environmental
your-water/pollution. Engineering 13(2):1-6.
[30] Global Water Partnership. 2000. “Integrated Water [51] Fedra, K. 2002. GIS and simulation models for Water
Resources Management.” TAC Background Papers No. Resources Management: A case study of the Kelantan
4. Stockholm: GWP Secretariat. River, Malaysia. GIS Development 6(8):39-43.
[31] Novotny, V. 1996. Integrated water-quality [52] Kamarudin, M. K. A., Toriman, M. E., Rosli, M. H., Juahir,
management’, Water Science and Technology 33:1–7. H., Aziz, N. A. A., Azid, A., Zainuddin, S. F. M., Sulaiman,
[32] Lovejoy, S. B., Lee, J. G., Randhir, T. O., & Engel, B. A. W. N. A. Analysis of meander evolution studies on effect
1997. Research needs for water quality management in from land use and climate change at the upstream
the 21st century a spatial decision support system’, reach of the Pahang River, Malaysia. Mitigation and
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 52(1):18-22. Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2015, 20,
[33] Mailhot, A., Rousseau, A. N., Massicotte, S., Dupont, J., 1319-1334.
& Villeneuve, J. P. 1997. A watershed-based system for
11 Zakiyyah, Tukimat, Razi, Zulfahmi, Muzzneena & Sahibin / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering) 78:1 (2016) 1–5