ch06 SM Rankin
ch06 SM Rankin
ch06 SM Rankin
Solution Manual
to accompany
Contemporary Issues in
Accounting
Michaela Rankin, Patricia Stanton,
Susan McGowan, Kimberly Ferlauto
& Matt Tilling
PREPARED BY:
Patricia Stanton
CHAPTER 6
1. Why do financial statements prepared under the IASB’s Conceptual Framework and
standards fail to meet the objective of financial reporting as outlined in the
Conceptual Framework? (K)
Financial statements are unable to achieve the objective of financial reporting because firms
do not report information that explains the main trends and factors that underlie their
development, performance, and position. Examples of such information include details about
the nature of the business, key resources, risks and relationships, and performance measures
and indicators.
2. Why do you think the author of the extract would expect readers of a marketing
journal would be interested in financial reporting? (J, AS)
Marketing focuses on the consumer and getting a “better deal” for them. Uses of financial
statements are consumers of the information; closing the gap in what is reported is a step in
getting a “better deal” for users. Additionally, the information that Management Commentary
should disclose specifically mentions customer measures (derived by marketers) as crucial
for assessing operating performance and, therefore, key information that should be reported
to investors.
3. What difficulties do you see in requiring the disclosed information to be ‘reliable and
comparable’ and ‘future oriented’? (J, AS)
Metrics about customer measures derived by marketing and other metrics related to key
resource would be reliable and comparable in the accounting sense. Other measures are more
subjective.
1. Despite reiterating that the annual report is the single most important document a
company sends to its shareholders, the writer is critical of annual reports. Outline
those criticisms. (K)
too long,
providing information with too much corporate spin,
providing information that is too diverse,
providing information that is incomprehensible to the average person,
2. If annual reports are so important to shareholders, why are fewer people reading
them? (K)
Because of the factors listed in (1) and it may be also that many shareholders own shares in
both their own name and their superannuation fund, and have requested only one annual
report.
3. Why do you think the shareholder friendly report initiative will not be a ‘perfect
replacement’ for a concise report? (J, K)
The author states that the numerous required disclosures may defeat the initiative.
Consistency
Transparency
Financial data easily accessible and interchangeable
3. Why will companies such as Edgar Online Inc. have to change their focus if they are
to survive widespread adoption of XBRL? (J, AS)
Companies such as Edgar Online Inc. Provide normalised data to analysts but XBRL is able
to do this without spending large amounts of expensive time converting data into a searchable
and analysable form. Their focus is likely to change to ways to make XBRL data more
marketable.
2. Consider the arguments for and against standardised reporting periods. Do you
agree that accounting periods should be more flexible? Give reasons for your answer.
There are several arguments given to support a more flexible approach to reporting periods.
For example, any standardised period cuts across many uncompleted transactions.
Standardisation may result in accountants apportioning unfinished operations and allocating
assets to an arbitrary accounting period of 12 months.
Chambers (cited by Luther) argued that the appropriate accounting period is determined
by the nature of the entity, so that it should reflect the earnings cycle of the reporting entity.
This view was supported by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants in 1973
but has not been adopted.
Johnson & Kaplan argue that standardisation puts pressure on managers to produce profits
over short-term periods. Luther quotes several authors who argue that to overcome the
problems created by standardisation, annual accounts should have a cumulative component
because they are tentative and conjectural statements, the truth of which cannot be verified
until the reporting entity has run its entire course.
They are „highly valued‟ because financial statements have been attested to by a third party
(auditor) who is supposedly independent of management.
To understand the term „fair presentation‟ see chapter 2. The term means that the
representation should be free from bias. In this light it can be equated with “faithful
6. Financial reports have been criticised for their lack of completeness. In what ways
do financial reports fail the completeness test?
Financial reports report on only those activities sanctioned by GAAP (including IASs).
Reporting entities engage in activities that are not captured in the reporting process. For
example, social and environmental activities largely go unreported in financial reports.
Reporting of Intangibles is restricted by accounting standards so that many intangibles are
not included in financial statements.
probability of the future benefits flowing to the reporting entity is too low
lack of reliable measurement for intangibles
the inability to separate many intangibles from their controlling entity.
Because the measure of corporate success has become whether a corporation has reached its
earnings predictions, the temptation for management is to „manage‟ earnings to match
analysts‟ forecasts. In this process, as outlined by Macintosh et al., accounting earnings do
not reflect the outcomes of an enterprise‟s strategic decisions. Instead, analysts‟ predicted
earnings determine the strategy of an enterprise to satisfy the prediction. This means
management may take predictions about earnings as targets and select investments that are
likely to produce reported income equal to or exceeding the analysts‟ forecasts. Meanwhile,
the market incorporates analysts‟ earnings forecasts into share prices. In this way, share
prices, analysts‟ forecasts and reported income all relate to each other but not to „true‟ or
underlying income.
Accounting standards prevent the recognition of many assets that contribute to the market
value of the reporting entity — voluntary disclosures make this information available.
To improve corporate reputations
13. Why should management explain poor performance in technical accounting terms?
Investors and other information users are assumed to be non-sophisticated users who are
unlikely to understand technical accounting terms and so, can be mislead in relation to the so-
called factors leading to a poor performance. The aim is to assign responsibility for the poor
performance to factors other than those in the control of management. In contrast, good
performances are reported in clear non-accounting terms, with responsibility for the
performance given to management.
14. Why do you think environmental disclosures are more researched than other social
disclosures?
Language can be thought of as the communication of data, ideas, thoughts and feelings
through a system of arbitrary signals, such as voice sounds, gestures, or written symbols. As a
language, XBRL creates data is created by „tagging‟ financial information. The XBRL
tagging process converts the financial information contained within a document such as an
excel spreadsheet into a „document‟ or computer file with XBRL codes.
XBRL fulfils many of the desired conditions of financial reporting such as timeliness and
comparability as well as satisfying the reliance on electronics as a means of communication.
Answers will depend on the annual report chosen and its financial year. Students should be
encouraged to select an annual report from a non-listed entity so that comparisons can be
made with a listed company‟s annual report (case study 6.1).
Most answers can be supplied in tabular form.
Case study 6.1 Reading the annual report: ten issues to consider
2. Follow the suggestions of the corporate regulator, and analyse the annual report:
(a) Examine the figures in the financial statements to get an overall impression of the
financial performance of the company.
Calculation of the commonly used financial ratios would be helpful in answering this
question.
(b) Note which figures you think are important to an understanding of the financial
performance of the company you have chosen.
The calculated ratios especially those relating to liquidity, profitability, debt, cash flows and
operating performance should be helpful.
(c) Read what management has to say about these figures in the front half of the
report.
Care should be taken to align the numbers reported in the financial statements and those
reported in the front half of the annual report. Management discussion can enlighten the
reported numbers; it can also obfuscate them. Impression management has been identified as
a tool used in annual reports. Positive images will be promoted; negative images will be
avoided. This strategy has been shown to be applied to the figures reported in the front half,
especially where those figures are reported graphically. Students should be aware that the
figures may reflect earnings management and realise that earnings management is difficult to
detect from a public document such as the annual report.
(d) Return to the financial report and examine the figures again, taking into account
what management has said in the front half. Has your assessment changed in any
way? How? (J, K, AS, CT)
Students should be guided by the questions identified by ASIC especially those relating to the
year‟s highlights and the comparison with the previous annual report if it is available.
3. Write a short assessment of the company as a potential investment. (J, K, AS, CT)
The assessment should include the key areas identified by the regulator: operational and
strategic activities of the company, the financial results and the future strategic directions and
performance. The 10 questions identified in the case study should give the assessment its
structure.
1. Suppose you are a company holding large quantities of financial instruments the
market value of which had declined markedly since purchase. How would you
classify those instruments and why? (J, AS)
The changes to IAS 39 created incentives for those holders of large quantities of financial
instruments with large impairment charges to classify the financial instruments as assets
“held to maturity” or as “loans and receivables”.
2. Compared to the pre-change IAS39, what are the likely impacts of the changes to
IAS 39 on balance sheet values of companies holding large amounts of financial
instruments? (K, AS)
Impairment charges that should have been taken to the profit and loss statement will not go
there so that reported profitability is higher for those companies with large quantities of
financial instruments with declining market values will be higher than if the standard had not
been changed.
3. Will companies with large holdings of dodgy financial instruments be motivated to
disclose information about those instruments? Give reasons for your answer. (J)J
Companies with dodgy financial instruments are likely to take advantage of the information
asymmetry between themselves and external stakeholders to manipulate the financial
performance of the company by not making any voluntary disclosures about their holdings.
Studies of impression management show that annual reports and other corporate
communication media with shareholders and other stakeholders generally seek images that
have positive expected values, while negatives are avoided.
4. What types of companies are likely to be impacted greatly by the changes to IAS39?
(K)
K
Banks, merchant banks, investment companies, superannuation companies and such.
5. How would the changes impact the truthfulness of financial reporting? (J, K)J K
6. How do the changes impact on the comparability of financial statements? (J, K)J K
The four choices should impact negatively on comparability, both of the balance sheet and
the profit and loss statements.
7. Would you expect the ‘market’ to look through the changes? How can you
empirically verify your answer? (J, K)
Advocates of the EMH would argue that the market would be expected to see through the
changes. To empirically support an answer, some research into the changes in share prices of