Prodev Tvet Lecterur
Prodev Tvet Lecterur
Prodev Tvet Lecterur
o Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if
changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that
suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
o NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
o ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your
contributions under the same license as the original.
By
218107655
RESEARCH REPORT
Master of Education
in the
in the
FACULTY OF EDUCATION
at the
UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG
10 February 2022
i
UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG
FACULTY OF EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT (DELM)
The University of Johannesburg places specific emphasis on integrity and ethical behaviour with
regard to the preparation of all written work to be submitted for academic evaluation.
Although academic personnel will provide you with information regarding reference techniques as well
as ways to avoid plagiarism, you also have a responsibility to fulfil in this regard. Should you at any
time feel unsure about the requirements, you must consult the lecturer concerned before you submit
any written work.
You are guilty of plagiarism when you extract information from a book, article or web page without
acknowledging the source and pretend that it is your own work. In truth, you are stealing someone
else’s property. This doesn’t only apply to cases where you quote verbatim, but also when you present
someone else’s work in a somewhat amended format (paraphrase), or even when you use someone
else’s deliberation without the necessary acknowledgement. You are not allowed to use another
student’s previous work. You are furthermore not allowed to let anyone copy or use your work with the
intention of presenting it as his/her own.
Students who are guilty of plagiarism will forfeit all credit for the work concerned. In addition, the matter
may also be referred to the Committee for Discipline (Students) for a ruling to be made. Plagiarism is
considered a serious violation of the University’s regulations and may lead to suspension from the
University.
For the period that you are a student at DELM, the under-mentioned declaration must accompany all
written work to be submitted. No written work will be accepted unless the declaration has been
completed and attached.
Declaration
1. I understand what plagiarism entails and am aware of the University’s policy in this regard.
2. I declare that this research report is my own, original work. Where someone
else’s work was used (whether from a printed source, the internet or any other source due
acknowledgement was given and reference was made according to departmental requirements).
3. I did not make use of another student’s previous work and submitted it as my own.
4. I did not allow and will not allow anyone to copy my work with the intention of presenting it as his
or her own work.
5. Turn-it-in was applied by me to check that plagiarism was less than 10%.
i
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
No man is an island. With that said, I wish to extend my sincere gratitude to the
following people who were there for me throughout my studying journey.
I thank the almighty God for giving me the strength, wisdom and patience to
persevere in the journey that started in January 2019.
My supervisor Dr van der Merwe for his wisdom, patience and unrelenting support.
Thank you for taking my work and turning it into a scholarly masterpiece. Your
guidance kept me grounded and your support and ideas gave me the enthusiasm
to do better. I am very grateful and honoured to have worked under your wing.
My husband Nhlanhla Nyembe and our three young children who endured all the
times I was physically present but mentally absent as I focused on my school work.
The patience and space they gave me to grow and empower myself will never be
forgotten. The journey would have been impossible without them around as my
primary cheerleaders.
My dear friend Nonhlanhla Cele, who has been there with me since the beginning,
giving me advice and ideas that I could use for my studies. She was also my
strength during those times of weakness and doubt.
To my parents Nokuthula and Zakhele Kubheka and grandfather Stephen Sibisi
who were so excited about my studies and were my support system.
To my friends and colleagues (lecturers and HODs) who supported me and heeded
my call when I requested them to partake in my research study.
To the college and campus management who opened the campus doors for me to
conduct my study at the college.
To the university administrative staff for those frequent calls and e-mails to touch
base and see how I was coping and where I needed support.
To all the facilitators of the coursework modules whose individual teachings formed
the building blocks that assembled the cumulative wisdom, I can proudly say I have
today.
i
ABSTRACT
Rapid technological development has affected the educational sector, prompting it to evolve
and embrace technology as part of everyday teaching and learning. The coronavirus
outbreak has exacerbated the need for educational institutions to transform from being
100% face-to-face learning institutions to ones that integrate ICT mechanisms as part of
teaching and learning. As a result of the COVID-19 lockdown in 2020, universities were
forced to suspend all contact learning activities and transition to online learning. However,
Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) colleges had to come to a
complete halt because they lacked response mechanisms in the form of infrastructure, and
experienced and knowledgeable lecturers. In this study, the training and resource needs of
TVET college lecturers are investigated. Moreover, lecturer training guidelines for remote
learning are proposed for TVET college leaders. Employing a generic qualitative research
approach, within the interpretivist worldview, data gathering was undertaken through
qualitative surveys and semi-structured interviews. Seventy-three TVET college lecturers
participated in the survey and three TVET college Heads of Department (HODs) were
interviewed from a TVET college in Ekurhuleni, Gauteng. The findings were presented using
a generic qualitative research design and reporting methods. The findings of the study
revealed that TVET college leaders need to furnish lecturers with resources and training in
the utilisation of remote learning prior to implementation. The appropriate resources and
training needed were recommended. The study also found that owing to the differing nature
of the vocational subjects offered at TVET colleges, the training and resource needs of
lecturers differed and therefore recommended that TVET leaders cater for the individual and
subject-related needs of the lecturers. The study also recommended a distributive
leadership approach to assist with the resource and training needs of lecturers, through the
formation of and reliance on campus and college committees comprising internal and
external stakeholders. Furthermore, training guidelines were recommended to ensure that
the training of lecturers is adequate, appropriate, accredited and meets global educational
standards to make sure that lecturers become 21st-century transformative intellectuals.
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................i
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................ iii
LIST OF TABLES PAGE ................................................................................... iv
LIST OF FIGURES PAGE ................................................................................. iv
1. BACKGROUND TO THE PROBLEM............................................................... 5
2. RESEARCH QUESTIONS ............................................................................... 6
3. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE RESEARCH.............................................. 6
4. CLARIFICATION OF CONCEPTS ................................................................... 6
4.1 Remote learning............................................................................................... 6
4.2 E-learning or online learning ............................................................................ 7
4.3 Face-to-face learning ....................................................................................... 7
4.4 Blended learning .............................................................................................. 7
5 LITERATURE REVIEW.................................................................................... 7
5.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 7
5.2 Theoretical framework...................................................................................... 8
5.3 The history of FET/TVET colleges ................................................................. 10
5.4 The change from FET to TVET colleges and migration to DHET................... 12
5.5 The courses offered at TVET colleges ........................................................... 13
5.6 The structure and background of TVET college lecturers .............................. 14
5.7 Remote learning at TVET colleges................................................................. 14
5.8 Leadership at TVET colleges ......................................................................... 17
5.9 Managing transformation ............................................................................... 21
5.10 Professional development – training for e-learning ........................................ 26
5.11 Factors to consider for TVET colleges to implement remote learning ............ 28
5.12 Strategies for training and implementation of remote learning ....................... 30
5.13 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 31
6 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ...................................................................... 32
6.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 32
6.2 Research paradigm........................................................................................ 33
6.3 Research approach and design ..................................................................... 34
6.4 Methods ......................................................................................................... 35
6.5 Contexts of study (including biographical details of the participants) ............. 36
6.6 Data collection method................................................................................... 37
6.7 Data analysis.................................................................................................. 39
6.8 Trustworthiness.............................................................................................. 40
6.9 Role of the researcher.................................................................................... 42
6.10 Ethical considerations .................................................................................... 43
6.11 Summary........................................................................................................ 45
i
7 FINDINGS AND INTERPRETATION ............................................................. 45
7.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 45
7.2 Findings from the qualitative survey............................................................... 46
7.3 Findings from the interviews .......................................................................... 49
7.4 Summary........................................................................................................ 73
8 SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION ............................ 73
8.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 73
8.2 Summary of the study .................................................................................... 74
8.3 Recommendations ......................................................................................... 76
8.4 Limitations of the study .................................................................................. 79
8.5 Recommendation for further research............................................................ 80
8.6 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 81
LIST OF REFERENCES........................................................................................... 83
APPENDIX 2: Permission letter................................................................................ 96
APPENDIX 3: Survey questionnaire......................................................................... 97
APPENDIX 4: Interview schedule........................................................................... 102
APPENDIX 5: Letters of consent ............................................................................ 105
APPENDIX 6: Turn-it-in result ................................................................................ 107
APPENDIX 7: Qualitative survey summarised (graphical) results .......................... 112
APPENDIX 8: Interview transcripts......................................................................... 134
ii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
iii
LIST OF TABLES PAGE
Figure 7.2: Online software tools for remote learning that lecturers require
training in 55
Figure 7.4: Best, fast and strong internet access responses from lecturers 63
iv
1. BACKGROUND TO THE PROBLEM
The novel COVID-19 outbreak resulted in enormous paradigm shifts in most areas of life. Where
previously people were required to mix and work together, they were now required to social-
distance and mostly, work from home. Nationwide and internationally the education and training
sectors were significantly affected by the pandemic (Majumdar, 2020) with UNESCO reporting
that over 95% of the student population in the world were impacted by the closure of educational
institutions (Bakare, Oviawe, Ariyo, Nwachukwu, Anoure, Anayo, Nwadi, Ibidapo, Victor &
Maghalu, 2020). In March 2020 when schools were closed in South Africa, traditional teaching
at TVET colleges nationwide also came to a complete halt (Mhlanga & Moloi, 2020). This has
slowed down learning opportunities and access to educational institutions and learning material,
especially for vulnerable TVET students who generally come from disadvantaged backgrounds
(Majumdar, 2020).
The COVID-19 pandemic led to UNESCO recommending a move to “distance and e-teaching
and learning”, and universities around the world responded positively to remote and e-teaching
and learning (Bakare et al., 2020). Locally, universities such as the University of Johannesburg
and the University of Pretoria suspended all contact classes and conducted teaching and
learning mostly online (Mhlanga & Moloi, 2020). The University of South Africa also suspended
all venue-based exams nationwide and conducted all exams online (McCain, 2020). TVET
colleges, on the other hand, reopened in July 2020 with little to no change in the manner that
teaching and learning transpired. Full contact classes resumed, albeit with a limited number of
students in order to observe COVID-19 regulations of social distancing. This could be ascribed
to TVET colleges’ practice-based learning approach that favours more traditional ways of
curriculum delivery. Mpu and Adu (2019) suggest that although TVET colleges are still situated
somewhat differently from other Higher Education institutions with a greater preference for
traditional ways of curriculum delivery, the need to adapt practices given the current challenges,
is prudent.
The coronavirus outbreak has exposed and exacerbated the dire need for lecturer development
in terms of 21st-century learning techniques (Ali, 2020). Juxtaposing colleges and the shift at
universities has revealed the immeasurable inequities and a digital divide at TVET colleges.
Developing 21st-century learning approaches and skills for curriculum delivery could advance
the professional knowledge, skills and values of lecturers as well as enhance the organisational
performance of TVET colleges. Consequently, the students’ educational needs will be met as
informed by the mandate of TVET colleges, which is to develop the country to “respond better to
5
the human resources, economics and development needs of the Republic and redress past
discrimination and ensure representivity and equal access” (Skills Development Act, Act 97,
1998). It thus becomes clear that knowledge and understanding of the training needed by TVET
college lecturers for online and remote learning are needed to support TVET college leadership
planning, coordinating and monitoring such teaching and learning given the challenges faced as
a result of the pandemic.
2. RESEARCH QUESTIONS
The main research question this study addressed was:
What were the training and resource needs of TVET college lecturers?
Elicit lecturers’ views of what their training and resource needs were when moving towards
remote learning in one local TVET college;
Elicit HODs perspective in one local TVET college on lectures’ training and resource needs
towards remote learning; and
Deduce implications for leadership at TVET colleges as well as propose guidelines for
training and support of lecturers towards remote learning at TVET colleges.
4. CLARIFICATION OF CONCEPTS
4.1 Remote learning
In this study, the term remote learning refers to the teaching and learning mechanism whereby
students and lecturers remain connected and actively engage in teaching and learning, while
they are at home or offsite the physical classrooms of the educational institution (Flynn, 2018).
Remote learning requires the use of a learning management system (LMS) that can be used by
both lecturers and students for continuous teaching and learning.
6
4.2 E-learning or online learning
E-learning or online learning is the use of information communication and technology for teaching
and learning (Naidoo & Dawuwa, 2019) and uses multimedia-enhanced features to create and
combine “text, graphics, audio and animation” (Ali, 2020) to liven up lessons. The online lessons
are normally recorded which allows students to have access to the lessons anytime and
anywhere.
5 LITERATURE REVIEW
5.1 Introduction
The wide and rapid spread of the coronavirus that led to the closure of educational institutions
has exposed how the face-to-face method of teaching and learning is vulnerable (Ali, 2020). The
development and changes experienced currently in science and technology affect development
and changes in the education sector (Geçer, 2013). This has resulted in new paradigms being
adopted to continue teaching and learning processes without any hindrance. Society at large is
compelled to have a “flexible and resilient” (Ali, 2020) education system, one that will not be
affected by unpredictable environmental factors. A more flexible and resilient education system
requires the utilisation of technology to support remote, distance and online learning altogether.
Evidence has shown that weakness and lack of infrastructure, inexperienced educators, the
“information-gap and the complexity of the environment” outside the education premises are still
a challenge (Murgatrodt as cited in Ali, 2020).
7
The shift from 100% contact learning to endorse a blended learning approach requires a hands-
on leadership that must be able to make informed decisions, in terms of infrastructure, software,
lecturer training needs and curriculum adjustments or adaptations as well as connectivity. The
reform that is needed at TVET colleges is central to the level of qualification and training of its
lecturers as it determines the “strengths and weaknesses” of the system of education (Wedekind,
2016). The central aim of this section is to delve deep into interrogating the foundations of TVET
colleges so as to understand how they came to be and continue to be 100% contact learning
institutions. There is a lack of lecturer training and infrastructure development for e-learning,
blended learning or remote learning. Researching the training and resource needs of lecturers
will help TVET college leaders’ endeavours to develop training guidelines that will be suitable for
all lecturers. This section commences with the theoretical framework that forms the building
blocks of the kind of leadership theories and other theories that will build the remote learning
structure of TVET colleges. The literature review commences with the historical background of
TVET colleges, the change from FET to TVET colleges and the migration to DHET, the courses
offered at TVET colleges, the structure and background of TVET college lecturers. It proceeds
to scrutinise the structure of remote learning at TVET colleges, leadership at TVET colleges, how
to manage transformation, how to develop staff members for e-learning, the factors and
strategies to consider when implementing remote learning, and concludes by highlighting the
importance of abandoning 100% contact learning and embracing remote learning.
8
This study critically examines a pluralistic approach, integrating transformational, transformative
and distributed leadership as the best-suited approaches to assist TVET colleges in moving from
being 100% contact learning institutions to embracing a remote learning environment, with the
focus being on lecturer resources and their training needs to enable them to be competent in a
remote learning environment. The transformational leader with a clear vision goes above and
beyond to motivate and inspire lecturers to yearn for change and improvement, to increase their
capacity, commitment and engagement (Bass, 1985) in achieving the goals of the college. The
transformative leadership approach looks at a TVET leader as a transformative intellectual
(Perumal, 2014), someone with “critique and promise” (Shields, 2010), who creates a just and
democratic learning environment, providing an inextricable linkage between “education [and]
educational leadership” (Shields, 2010) with the wider societal context that surrounds it.
Transformative leadership applies feminist pedagogical approaches of empowerment,
community and leadership, which gives guidance on the teaching practices that will empower
the student community to act responsibly towards each other, take ownership of their learning
and understand learning as an extended societal action (Shrewsbury, 1987). The community
role incorporates Bronfenbrenner’s theory of ecological systems in a child’s or a student’s life.
Remote learning will connect the student’s different microsystems such as the home, college,
community (internet café’s, libraries, information centres, etc.) and the peers, in turn forming a
mesosystem (Bronfenbrenner, 2013).
The transformative environment constructed gives rise to the third leadership theory of
distributed leadership whereby the roles and college leadership are distributed to the lecturers,
programme managers and HODs to assist in the growth of the college holistically which creates
synergy among the contrasting work levels of the staff and enhances the performance of the
college (Badenhorst & Radile, 2018). An effective leader inspires lecturers to buy into the same
vision, creating a collaborative and cooperative environment, expansive involvement and
confidence in each other (Hallinger & Lee, 2013). As part of remote learning, distributed
leadership extends to allow students to take responsibility for their learning as it happens at the
college and remotely.
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs theory proposes that individuals have five tiers of needs that ought
to be satisfied, starting with the lowest being physiological needs and moving up to the highest
level being self-actualisation needs for staff members to be motivated. It gives us a structure of
how the leaders at TVET colleges can fulfil the needs of the lecturers that have risen and have
been exacerbated by the lockdown as a result of COVID-19 which has brought to light the need
9
to embrace a new paradigm for teaching and learning. This need necessitates training lecturers
and furnishing them with appropriate resources so that they realise their self-actualisation needs.
As leaders endeavour to develop lecturers in terms of training and resources for remote learning,
they are in turn advancing the TVET colleges as learning organisations. According to Senge’s
(2006) “fifth disciplines”, a learning organisation refers to the way an organisation follows to
progressively create a future, by adapting the working environment to change that is contributory
to continuously reshaping the working environment. Lecturers will be encouraged to expand
their knowledge and skills by having the freedom to continually learn from others and “learn
together” to create truly desired results, creating realities using new ideas and patterns of thinking
(Senge, 2006).
Further Education and Training (FET) colleges and TVET colleges were enacted by Parliament,
informed at the macro level by the constitution of the country which enshrines the “right to basic
and further education”, that the state must provide progressively and “through reasonable
measures” (Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, section 29). The qualifications
offered at FET/TVET colleges were also shaped by the promulgation of the SAQA Act no. 58 of
1995, which gave birth to the National Qualifications Framework (NQF), which further mapped
the education system of the country in its entirety (Wedekind, 2016). FET/TVET colleges were
placed in the FET Band (NQF levels 2, 3 and 4). In Table 1, Pretorius and Lemmer (2004) depict
the National Qualifications Framework which outlines the structure of the education system in
our country and the placement of FET/TVET college qualifications.
10
Table 5.1: National Qualifications Framework (NQF) levels
11
The paramount aims and mandates of TVET colleges are to respond positively to the “country’s
labour market and community needs”; increase the value of the “country’s Skills Development
Strategy”; create opportunities for work and higher education; “create knowledge and
development of high-level skills for academia and technical quality demands of the country” and
“establish a coordinated TVET system offering programme-based vocational and occupational
training” (Continuing Education and Training Act, 2006).
5.4 The change from FET to TVET colleges and migration to DHET
Colleges were under the Department of Education at a national level, administered by the
Provincial Education Departments at a provincial level and governed by the College Council at
a local/college level. They were called Further Education and Training (FET) colleges from the
time they were launched by Minister Kader Asmal on 15 May 2003 (Kohler, 2003). The DHET
(2014) states that in 2009 the president established two new departments namely: the
Department of Basic Education (DBE) and the Department of Higher Education and Training
(DHET). The Council of Education Ministers (CEM) requested that the Minister of Higher
Education and Training (MHET) take over the functions of FET colleges and Adult Education and
Training (AET) centres. Colleges were transformed into TVET colleges to make them the key
drivers of the system to respond to macro resources and the skills development strategy of the
country and redress past inequities (Wedekind, 2016) and also to endeavour to align the country
with international practices.
Mpu and Adu (2019) posit that the migration of public TVET colleges to the DHET led to the
expectation that TVET colleges would be designed as universities. This would include factors
such as the development of technology, which would allow TVET colleges to be global players
through the transformation of teaching strategies and syllabi to meet global standards, form
international partnerships and afford equal education opportunities to everyone who met the
necessary entrance requirements. To this day, TVET colleges still use more traditional methods
of curriculum delivery (Mpu & Adu, 2019) and are still lagging in terms of technological
advancement as compared to universities. It is also noted that TVET college lecturing
qualifications are still being developed and currently there is little to no evidence of who TVET
college lecturers are, their teaching methodology and their knowledge and skills (Wedekind &
Bolton, 2016). This places them somewhat differently between Basic Education and Higher
Education institutions. Geel (2005) and Phutsisi (2006) lament that TVET colleges are still a
“black box” pertaining to their current teaching staff because TVET college lecturers seem to be
left out from the reform and transformations taking place.
12
5.5 The courses offered at TVET colleges
TVET colleges offer two courses specially designed for differing purposes and types of students.
The first one is the National Certificate and Vocational (NCV), which is designed to substitute
formal academic schooling and also address the demand for quality skills (Gewer, 2016). It
accepts learners who have passed Grade 9. The second one is the NATED (National Accredited
Technical Education Diploma) programmes for post-school students to acquire knowledge for
the workplace (Wedekind, 2016), with some engineering courses offered for students who have
passed Grade 9. Table 2 provides the tabulated structure of courses/instructional programmes
offered at TVET colleges by the DHET (2008; 2015).
The courses outlined above comprise “theoretical, practical and educational” (Wedekind, 2016)
subjects that must be offered by lecturers. Some courses require lecturers to have formal
teaching qualifications while others require lecturers to have an industry background (Wedekind,
13
2016). Transforming the courses listed above to online learning will require extensive research,
funding and training as some of the courses cannot be offered online. They will need to be
adapted and adjusted to fit into the new learning environment. Hence it is very important as a
departure point to understand the needs of lecturers for them to be able to offer their subjects
online. It is also important that the leaders at TVET colleges have proper and working guidelines
of how the lecturers can be trained for the individual subjects as a “one-size-fits-all approach”
(Wedekind, 2016) will not help or be workable.
TVET colleges’ inception did not come with a definite structure and formal qualification for TVET
college lecturers. Wedekind (2016) found that TVET college lecturers have a wide range of
combinations of qualifications, academic and educational qualifications and workplace
experiences. TVET college lecturers are “former technical college staff (generally with a trade
qualification and work experience)”, qualified teachers with basic education teaching experience,
recently qualified graduates from universities, universities of technology and colleges with or
without teaching qualifications, as well as personnel recruited from industries.
Remote learning is a mechanism whereby students and educators remain connected and
engage in teaching and learning while at home or offsite the institutions’ premises. They do not
constantly meet in a conventional classroom but are connected by employing Information and
Communication Technology (ITC). Technology tools such as discussion boards, emails, audio-
bridges, video conferencing and instant messaging (Flynn, 2018) come in handy in a remote
learning environment. A remote learning environment comprises engagement between the
educator and the students, critically engaging with the learning materials through problem
solving, discussions and role play, to encourage active participation rather than a passive
learning environment.
E-learning entails using ICT to provide tuition to students (Naidoo & Dawuwa, 2019). Students
have access to learning wherever they are through the touch of the button. It can be used to
14
provide a better comprehension of the coursework, provide simulation for varying courses and
provide a detailed presentation that can aid students to better understand difficult courses. The
use of online instruction or e-learning has the advantage of allowing the use of multimedia-
enhanced features to create or combine “text, graphics, audio and animation” (Ali, 2020), to liven
up and demonstrate classroom lessons that cannot be explained and comprehended with text
only. Ali (2020) expands on this by suggesting that online learning/ICT tools help students have
a better comprehension of the instructions and materials, and also implement “virtual
experiments” that could be expensive, time-consuming and perilous to conduct in a physical
classroom or school laboratory. Students get to replay all recorded portions of the tuition that
they did not grasp clearly when they were initially explained by the lecturer.
Blended learning is a merger of face-to-face learning and e-learning. Because of the practical
nature of the vocational knowledge taught at TVET colleges, Naidoo and Dawuwa (2019) posit
that reliance cannot be placed on e-learning only as this would constitute distance learning. We
have seen with the 21st-century technological revolution and the slippery slope brought about
by the coronavirus outbreak that 100% contact learning is slowly but surely becoming obsolete.
The practical courses offered, inter alia, mechanical and related design, hospitality and carpentry
cannot be offered online in their entirety. Naidoo and Dawuwa (2019) further suggest that face-
to-face learning be solely focused on the vocations’ practical aspects and e-learning be focused
on transformative or theoretical aspects of the vocation. Blended learning offers opportunities
for learning anytime, in the classroom or remotely, offering synchronous interaction between the
students and lecturers and provides immediate feedback.
Lecturers who are used to walking into a simple traditional classroom to teach must now engage
in and “construct a virtual environment” of teaching and learning (Saadé, He & Kira, 2007). To
achieve this, lecturers need to be experts in their subject matter but also learn theories related
to “education, computer science and behaviour” (Saadé et al., 2007). They also need to be able
to adjust their role and character traits, develop varying communication skills, creativity and
develop broader competencies related to computers to fit into the new learning environment.
New online learning elements need to be developed that will be harmonious with those of
traditional learning to make remote learning possible. These elements comprise “learning
15
theories, learning tools and processes of communication” (Saadé et al., 2007) between students,
lecturers and technologies used and whether the learning will be system- or user-centred. Saadé
et al. (2007) have identified the four additional elements namely: “the human component, the
design component, the instructional component and the performance component”. They have
also developed six dimensions of remote learning namely:
Affect: The individual’s “feelings of joy, elation, pleasure, depression, distaste, discontent-
ment or hatred” are based on a particular behaviour (Triandis as cited in Saadé et al., 2007).
“Learner’s perception of the course”: How students feel about using ICT-incorporated course
learning as part of their holistic learning journey instead of 100% face-to-face learning.
“Perceived learning outcomes”: The use of learning tools to reach outcomes measured
based on “performance improvement, grades benefits and meeting learning needs”.
Attitude: The students’ and lecturers’ attitudes towards remote learning impacts the learning
and teaching received by the students.
Intrinsic motivation: The motivational perspectives, centred on learning theories to
understand behavioural intentions and how the use of technology is accepted.
Extrinsic motivation: Motivation that focuses on the performance of the students, measured
by the students’ grades, rewards, prizes and others.
Clear, Haataja, Meyer, Suhonen and Varden (2001) put forward five model learning concepts
that incorporate the use of technology. The most prominent being the “Model C: Open learning
+ Class”. I liken this model to blended or remote learning as it shares salient tenets, such as it
being dependent on printed course guides and textbooks and other ICT multi-media interfaces.
Students and lecturers come together periodically, in a specified location, such as a conventional
classroom to engage in “laboratory experiments, simulations, problem-solving activities and
other learning exercises”. Exams are also administered in a controlled environment, under the
strict and watchful eye of the lecturers.
To deliver learning there should be pertinent ICT support in terms of “infrastructure and tools,
hardware and software support systems” (Ali, 2020). Software needs include having appropriate
technical applications of online education. Hardware includes, but is not limited to, depending
on the nature of the course and subject matter, “laptops, projectors, tablets, smartphones, iPads
and interactive whiteboards” (Ali, 2020). Lecturers also need to have sufficient “broadband and
connected devices” onsite and off-site for online learning (World Bank, 2020). Having all the
resources does not mean ICT-integrated learning can be implemented that easily (Vrasidas,
16
2015); it is crucial that lecturers also receive adequate “training and support in ICT and
pedagogy” (Yunus, 2007). This would also include taking care of “staff readiness and motivation
needs” (Ali, 2020).
Leadership is seen as one of the salient factors that influence education institutions and their
students’ outcomes (Bush & Glover, 2016). Robertson and Frick (2018) note that leadership at
TVET colleges requires the capacity to identify and define the goals and outcomes of the
organisation at the individual and institutional level, and to develop organisational strategic plans
of how to achieve the set goals and desired outcomes. Prentice (1961) visualises leadership as
an ability to “understand people, motivate and enlist employee participation in a way that marries
individual needs and interests” to the purpose of the college. The leader needs to have “traits,
qualities and behaviour” that encourage and motivate their lecturers to participate, develop and
commit themselves to the organisation (Badshah, 2012). College leaders are embroiled in a
reciprocal and non-coercive relationship with the staff members and the department. They also
work to meet government mandates and deal with cost pressures.
Colleges operate in varying sectors such as the private (business and industries), public
(business, industry, education and labour) and the community at large as well as in constant
policy changes. A college leader has to direct lecturers on a mutual purpose (Rost, 1991), as
they negotiate their way into integrating into the higher education sector and the multifaceted
vocational offerings and the different sectors. They have unique and diverse needs and have to
keep abreast of the continued improvements in teaching and learning that is influenced by many
factors such as the ever-evolving market trends, industrial revolutions, meeting global
educational standards and changing environmental factors. Leaders are compelled to present
and represent the colleges’ interests to the local community and businesses. College leaders
are also accountable for the colleges’ human, physical and financial resources and for keeping
in line with “business strategy and education, educational policy and local reality,
entrepreneurship and accountability, managerialism and professionalism” (Callan, Mitchell,
Clayton & Smith, 2007). Leaders must have expertise in “fiscal and human resource
management, public relations, collective bargaining and politics” (Robertson, 2016) and have a
recent additional role of having to accommodate flexible learning and teaching mechanism, such
17
as online learning as well as timetabling its periods and place, whilst keeping in mind the
students’ limitations and aspirations (Eddy, 2010).
An organisation’s performance and well-being are dependent on innovative leadership that help
to create a harmonious balance and sustain relationships between the leader and the
subordinates. The same holds true for TVET colleges, and lack of this coherence and good
performance results in disengagement by the lecturers, students and consequently, prospective
employers (Field, Musset & Galvarez-Alvan, 2014). In a study conducted by Badenhorst and
Radile (2018), it was found that a distributed leadership approach is the most prominent in
colleges professional development. Leaders need to capacitate lecturers through “training,
coaching and mentoring” on instructional practices. This should include all TVET stakeholders
at different organisational levels so as to develop a “shared vision”. Leaders are also said to
achieve optimal development of staff by establishing open communication channels “vertically,
horizontally and diagonally”, distributing responsibilities, keeping momentum in capacitating,
empowering, monitoring staff and making continuous and consistent follow-ups. Lecturers also
account for all aspects of their profession, such as student performance and classroom
management and administration. Leaders must have strategic operational plans that will aid in
strengthening the tracking of the performance and accountability of lecturers based on the
assigned distributed responsibilities and “collaborate instructional management practices”.
TVET college leaders play a transformative role that is required by legislation. To realise this
role, they must be furnished with the right “leadership competence, knowledge, skills, attributes
and attitudes” (Mpu & Adu, 2019). As transformative intellectuals (Perumal, 2014), leaders
should think and function differently to be able to overcome potential technological challenges.
They should align education organisational practices to ones envisaged by the market. Leaders
need to create a learning management system to embrace the “distributive revolution”
(Nundkumar & Subban, 2018) brought by ICT, and develop strategic plans for sustainable and
meaningful organisational growth (Naong, 2016). Leaders need to support lecturers “technically,
socially and morally” (Ali, 2020) to successfully deliver classes online. This extends to
empowering lecturers, upskilling and building their confidence to be able to implement ICT-
integrated teaching (Yuen & Ma, 2002).
18
An effective leader knows that they have to take a personal interest in their followers for their
long-term development and also encourage their followers to achieve their best. This not only
fulfils the individual motivation of the staff members, but it is also in the “interest of furthering
organisation-wide goals” (Prentice, 1961). A leader accords followers opportunities to learn and
grow themselves individually and collectively. As much as leadership at TVET colleges is
complex and multifaceted, the leader needs to also focus on bringing about technological reform
to teaching and learning by concentrating on catering for the needs of lecturers. The type of
transformational leader that is needed at TVET colleges can motivate lecturers to do more than
the usual (Bass, 1985), and be able to raise the needs level on “Maslow’s hierarchy of lecturers’
needs” (McLead, 2018) to the highest level, which is self-actualisation.
The coronavirus pandemic that led to a hard lockdown and compulsory requirements for social
distancing has not only exposed the need for technological advancement at TVET colleges, it
has also exacerbated the need for ICT-integrated learning resources and adequate training for
lecturers to become competent at remote learning (Ali, 2020). The need to migrate to
online/remote learning calls for the government, as the primary employer, through its college
leaders to construct educational information centres and equip lecturers and students with
“standardised home-based teaching and learning equipment” (Ali, 2020), and conduct online
learning training for lecturers. Mmako and Schultz (2016) posit that higher education institutions
are faced with a disturbing and increasing imbalance whereby the demand is very high but the
institutions are under-equipped with response mechanisms, strategies (Barkhuizen & Rothman,
2008) and resources to meet the environmental demands, leaving lecturing staff with high levels
of stress. Having to perform complex tasks without resources, having large classes comprising
a lecturer-student ratio of ±1:35 and the lack of “capacity in academic development”.
Furthermore, this results in lecturers being demoralised and lacking motivation. The needs of
lecturers can be catered for in terms of Maslow hierarchy of needs as depicted by McLead (2018)
in Figure 5.1.
19
Figure 5.1: Maslow’s hierarchy of needs
Source: McLead, S. (2018). Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, Simply Psychology, 1, 1–8.
20
can support lecturers to perform their duties provide motivation and give lecturers a sense of
belonging.
5.8.3.5 Self-actualisation
When lecturers have mastered their competency in traditional as well as e-learning and have all
the resources needed, they gain reputation and respect, their self-esteem needs have been met
and also heightened. It leads them to realise their potential and be at the peak of their
performance. The performance of the TVET college holistically will be improved to meet
international standards, 21st-century technological standards and 4th-industrial revolution
standards and will transform colleges into global players.
Transformative leadership
21
autonomously, independently and actively participating in transforming their world (Webb,
Walker & Allen, 2002). Empowerment also means that lecturers create strategies of how they
will find their balance between teaching in the classroom and teaching remotely.
A transformative learning environment enhances the learning process itself, builds the self-
confidence of the students and also creates a “community of mutuality” (Shrewsbury, 1987) and
creativity is enhanced in a consensus process. Students learn using different learning methods
in the comfort of a familiar environment, which is in their home or their community. The theory
of community in feminist pedagogy ropes in the parents, peers and the society at large, forming
an interconnectedness beyond the walls of a physical classroom. The mesosystem of
Bronfenbrenner’s ecological system will be upheld, whereby different microsystems interact, the
home linking with the school, peers and the students’ intimate community (Bronfenbrenner,
2013). The leaders will promote the autonomy and individuality of lecturers and build a sense of
connectedness with the lecturers.
The transformative leadership theory entails leaders sharing some of their power with the
lecturers, while the lecturers also cascade the power down to the students, who must take active
ownership of their studies, developing goals and objectives for the learning process and thus
enhancing lecturers’ planning and negotiating skills. A “sense of shared purpose” (Shrewsbury,
1987) is created as the leader of the college will also become an active follower, as they track
the teaching and learning process, especially how lecturers are coping, the progress, and the
performance of the students. A feminist context leadership creates an intuitive connection
between the community and empowerment and provides mechanisms for achieving such a
learning environment. Students collaborate, interact and take an active part in their learning, at
their own time and pace (Ali, 2020) and promote self-directed learning.
The DHET perceives the traditional methodology of teaching and learning through “face-to-face
techniques” (Nundkumar & Subban, 2018) to be unsustainable, considering that TVET colleges
operate in an environment with limited resources. The DHET suggested that more “innovative
open learning approaches” be considered to limit the risks, especially to achieve “effective
resource management”. Transforming to online learning will require fewer lecturers to teach
onsite considering that face-to-face learning numbers are limited to observe all COVID-19
protocols. Online learning will also save on “provisioning of education and training resources”
as compared to contact learning. Achieving technology transformation in this regard will make
22
the lecturers more knowledgeable and skilful (Marope, Chakroun & Holmes, 2015) and also
adapt easily to the ever-changing emergence of technologies, which in turn fosters continuous
learning. TVET colleges need to have technological learning systems that are flexible to adapt
to any supply of skills to the radically and rapidly changing social and economic needs of the
country (Marope et al., 2015). This transformation will also require the involvement of all labour
market stakeholders to align supply with demand.
The digital age that we are in makes it imperative for teaching strategies and physical learning
structures to conform with learning organisations of the 21st century (Mpu & Adu, 2019), thus
forcing all organisations, including education institutions, to change (Kiran, Agarwal & Verma,
2013). The work environment is reshaped continuously to adapt to change (Dibella, 2011). A
learning organisation entails what an organisation such as a TVET college should do to facilitate
the learning of its staff members. The rapid digital revolution requires continuous skilling and
23
reskilling of its members through “life-long learning” (Kanwar, Balasubramanian & Carr, 2019).
This makes it compulsory that an organisation adopts permanent innovative ways for life-long
learning, allowing its members to self-learn and also learn in teams. Lecturers will be
encouraged to broaden their knowledge and skills, nurturing new ideas and patterns of thinking
(Senge, 2006) that will assist the college to grow and keep abreast of ever-changing market
trends. This also advances “social cohesion and democracy”, enhances skills that in turn boosts
the economy and also “builds global citizenship and peace” (Kanwar et al., 2019). Amalgamating
the 21st-century learning concepts with Senge (2006)’s fifth discipline of organisational learning
results in the following understanding:
24
5.9.4.4 Teams thinking
Team thinking refers to different people in a learning organisation, coming together to produce
“extraordinary capabilities” (Senge, 2006), engaging in dialogues, putting ideas together,
discovering insights and enhancing creativity. Transformative social learning occurs as lecturers
learn in groups in their common courses/subjects. New practices are adopted and new
knowledge is established during group work. Lecturers develop new innovative lesson plans,
schemes of works and methods of teaching and learning and assessment can be enhanced but
still be within the prescribed syllabi and assessment guidelines. This can happen when the
norms are altered and new mutual expectations are formed (Jørgensen, 2011).
25
5.9.5.2 Limited resources and funding
TVET colleges operate in an environment with limited resources and funding (Nundkumar &
Subban, 2018). Funding the acquisition of ICT resources is a challenge to the realisation of the
e-learning part of remote learning. TVET colleges currently do not have the appropriate ICT
resources, facilities and personnel to implement remote learning (Bakare et al., 2020). There is
limited access to the internet, limited access to computer centres/classrooms, and, in most
cases, there is no access whatsoever off-site campuses.
It is essential to enable lecturers to broaden their skills and professional knowledge that was
developed in traditional modes of teaching and learning (Matzel & Edmund as cited in Mpu &
Adu, 2019). For remote learning to take place successfully, two parallel activities must take
transpire concurrently: “curriculum development” and a “national strategy of training college
lecturers”, within a coherent lecturer development framework (Gewer, 2010).
It is imperative that lecturers willingly embrace change for the integration of technology to be
successful (Ali, 2020). Technology serves as a catalyst and will also support lecturers to prepare
and deliver lessons (Sadegül Akbaba, Kalayci & Avci, 2011). As motivation to lecturers, they
must be given adequate time to prepare and be supported in unsupportive curriculum design
(Vrasidas, 2015) as having the resources is not enough and does not mean automatic
implementation. Hence there must be other supportive factors for lecturers, such as staff
readiness (Vrasidas, 2015). Rigorous “training and support in ICT and pedagogy” is essential
before lecturers are expected to implement a new teaching and learning pedagogy (Yunus,
2007). Staff readiness and motivation are prominent factors that must be considered to
assimilate successfully to remote learning at TVET colleges (Ali, 2020). The lecturers’
26
willingness and attitude towards implementing ICT has a huge impact on the students’
performance (Huang & Liaw, 2005).
Suffice to say, for TVET colleges to be successful they need to employ lecturers with skills to
perform tasks as per subject requirements and the college attaining its strategic goals. It stands
to reason therefore that as times change, the individual needs and subject-specific training needs
of lecturers also change which requires a tailor-made training plan. As much as there are no
guidelines and policies on how to give individual training to lecturers, it is up to the leaders in
their endeavours to capacitate lecturers to identify lecturers whose “skills or ability needs
developing” and those that lack motivation (Dobre, 2013). Leaders have to go the extra mile in
catering for the individual and subject-specific needs of lecturers, viewing it as a “true investment
in human capital” (Naong, 2016). When lecturers are more developed, skilled and
knowledgeable, specifically to their individual needs and specific subjects, they become more
satiated and committed to their job, thus increasing their performance which consequently leads
to greater organisational effectiveness (Naong, 2016) and it also sustains the future competitive
advantage of TVET colleges.
TVET college subjects are different in their offerings or delivery, some needing formal teaching
qualifications while others requiring lecturers to have some industry background (Wedekind,
2016) because of the practical nature of the courses. Lecture-based subjects can easily and
rapidly be moved to an online platform such as “events management and secretarial courses”
(Naidoo & Dawuwa, 2019). Digitised learning contents, aligned with the curricula can also be
moved online rapidly. Other curricula cannot be easily adapted or transferred to online learning
(Ali, 2020). Additional factors such as “instructional approaches, content, pacing, interaction
models and assessment” (World Bank, 2020) will also need careful adaptation to enable
institutions to transition to online learning. The curriculum change/adaptation that needs to take
place to accommodate e-learning is also influenced by the “historical, cultural and social
pressures” (Mpu & Adu, 2019) of the country.
27
5.11 Factors to consider for TVET colleges to implement remote learning
Technology implementation is the potent vehicle for e-learning delivery and needs “close cross-
collaboration” between “instructional, content, technology teams” (Ali, 2020) and educational
stakeholders, needing careful decision making and coordination. The following factors are the
main drivers of the change envisaged:
Infrastructure
The World Bank posited that the highest performing educational systems are not capacitated
adequately to provide online learning for the large scale of students. The pace of technological
advancement has left decision-makers unable to keep pace with the costs and infrastructural
support needed (World Bank, 2020). To be able to deliver online and blended/remote learning
there has to be adequate ICT support pertaining to “infrastructure, tools, hardware and software
support systems” (Ali, 2020). Infrastructural development has no “one-size-fits-all” (Moskal,
Dziuban & Hartman, 2013) approach, it is a continuous process that is dependent on the needs
of the colleges’ goals, objectives and courses offered and spans over an extended period.
Moskal et al. (2013) depict the following strategic questions to be answered for infrastructural
acquisition for remote learning:
Why engage in remote learning?
What are the “goals and outcomes to be achieved”, short and long term?
What would be the benefit for the students?
What are the courses and programs to be offered in a blended learning format and why?
What engagement and support do the campuses and departments need?
How blended learning should be rolled-out in the entire college?
Where to begin?
What are the investment levels and returns?
Software
Remote learning requires software support systems that incorporate “text, graphics, audio and
animation” (Ali, 2020), to liven up lessons that require or will be well explained and demonstrated
with more than just text (Thomas & Israel, 2013). Having such a multimedia-enhanced interface
in an educational context has many benefits such as improving students’ comprehension of the
instructional materials, allowing students to carry out virtual experiments that tend to be costly
and perilous to conduct in a physical classroom setting (Hennessy, Deaney & Ruthven, 2006).
Education institutions can also use software and learning applications that are free and readily
accessible on the internet (Ali, 2020).
28
Connectivity
Lecturers should have adequate access to ample broadband and connected devices at home
and at the institution to facilitate the e-learning environment and to be able to communicate with
students and parents as the lack thereof will result in students not being able to learn online
(World Bank, 2020). Students need to have immediate access to the learning material at home
using the internet (WAN-Wide Area Network) and at the college using WIFI (Wireless Fidelity)
and offline gaining access to the Local Area Network (LAN) of the college. The IT connection
must be such that it supports usage for high and “low bandwidth including offline solutions” (Ali,
2020) for all digital learning materials and media. Colleges can reach out to Internet Service
Providers (ISPs) like Vodacom who are readily available to support learning, to help colleges to
get internet access for both staff and students that is free, zero-rated or cheaper-rated (Ali, 2020).
In congruence with this, Nundkumar and Subban (2018) said that the DHET intended to
collaborate with the then Department of Telecommunication and Postal Services and the
Department of Science and Technology to increase access by releasing “increased bandwidth
and reducing costs for educational purposes”
Policy
The technological advancement towards remote learning needs to be legislated because of its
cost implications and to ensure it is compulsory for every role player. The study aims to
understand and reveal the training and resource needs of TVET lecturers. However, that would
be a futile exercise if no policy puts everything into place. There is a professional development
plan and an assets and infrastructure policy, however, a new policy must be developed that
marries the two together in terms of remote learning. China has initiated such a policy called,
“Suspending classes without stopping learning policy” (Ali, 2020). This policy implementation
gave rise to the initiative called “disrupted classes, undisrupted learning” (Huang, Liu, Tlili, Yang
& Wang, 2020) providing online learning to their learners. Developing the remote learning policy
will also aid in managing online learning amicably by the leaders and help with pedagogical
reform in education (Ali, 2020). Policy for training and resources for remote learning must be
developed prior to implementation as it must align theory with practice. It should cover the scope
and extent of training and resources, issues of “intellectual property ownership, copyright,
workload” (Moskal et al., 2013), and the contract, agreement and terms and conditions for the
resources such as laptops and internet usage for lecturers.
29
Sustainability
The DHET acceded that face-to-face teaching and learning techniques are unsustainable and
suggested that alternative sustainable and innovative techniques be sought to eliminate
“potential risks to effective resource management” (Nundkumar & Subban, 2018). To sustain
remote learning at TVET colleges, in addition to the colleges’ IT department proactively doing
regular maintenance and applying system and security updates and patches, Nundkumar and
Subban (2018) suggest employing more technologies of “Cyber-Physical Systems” to decrease
any risks of the e-learning systems crashing and to sustain it for a longer period. The DHET
project of “Capacity building of TVET colleges lecturers through a sustainable national open
learning management system” (Adendorff & Van Wyk, 2016) can be useful in offering formal,
informal, open-learning and open-source training to lecturers to keep on par with the ever-
changing trends of technology. In general, it will help lecturers to keep up with the times.
Funding/financing
Mhlanga and Moloi (2020) say that strategies that have been implemented successfully for
remote learning by several universities were to move most if not all learning activity to digital
platforms. The Department of Basic Education also published “textbooks, worksheets, revision
booklets and study guides on their websites”. The tools that are used for online learning include
“internet websites, YouTube, Microsoft Teams, Skype, WhatsApp groups and Zoom”. UNESCO
30
(2020) has also developed a “hybrid learning strategy” that combines both remote and traditional
face-to-face learning, ensuring learning continuity and also improved student experience which
could be adapted for TVET colleges and consists of the following steps:
Training offered to lecturers is based on fulfilling section 22 of the Skills Development Act.
Research and analysis must be conducted to determine the “skills development needs of the
country, sector or the organ of state” (Skills Development Act, 1998). In a nutshell, all colleges
as organs of state must conduct their research and analysis and then develop their training
plan/strategy as per the needs of the institution. As we have learnt that when it comes to training
for remote learning a “one-size-fits-all approach” (Wedekind, 2016) will not be feasible as the
needs of lecturers vary. It is therefore my contention that college leaders are responsible for
developing their own training plan/strategy.
5.13 Conclusion
This chapter critically dealt with the importance of TVET college’s transformation in adopting a
different paradigm of teaching and learning by moving away from 100% contact learning and
moving towards blended remote learning. The transformation in education from the inception to
31
migration of TVET colleges to DHET makes it noticeable that there is still no structure for courses
and qualifications designed especially for TVET college lecturers to offer all courses as outlined
in this study. Paterson (2016) reported that the DHET is still in the process of developing formal
“professional level qualifications” and a comprehensive qualification structure for TVET college
lecturers, which leaves TVET leaders relying on the Skills Development Act provision for lecturer
development. Kooij, Jansen, Dikkers and de Lange (2010) hold that when a leader has highly
committed human resource practices that include “training and development”, it creates a strong
bond and attachment of the lecturers to the college as it heightens motivation, job satisfaction,
employee retention and other desirable individual-level outcomes” and motivates lecturers to feel
highly confident to perform innovative tasks. Furthermore, in preparing to migrate education
outside 100% traditional physical classrooms, coordination, thought and careful decision making
on the part of TVET college leaders is essential. The move requires pluralist approaches to
leadership incorporating transformational, transformative and distributed leadership styles.
An ICT-immersed learning environment needs optimism, belief and motivation as the digital
revolution synergises educational interests and ambitions of both the students and lecturers.
Adopting remote learning as an education system is a necessity to keep abreast of the “rapid
emergence of new technologies” (Ali, 2020). It is therefore important to cater for the resource
and training needs of lecturers, as they are at the forefront of teaching and learning. When TVET
colleges do not realise this transformation, it will have far-reaching and undesirable
consequences for all. Lecturers will remain undeveloped, demotivated and demoralised and
TVET colleges will become irrelevant as they will not be on par with business and industries (the
supply will not be aligned to demand). Society will continue to be stratified, having copious
citizens especially the young not being able to take an active part and benefit from new
technology opportunities and who cannot compete in the global market. Literature furthermore
supports that not adopting an ICT-immersed learning environment will also increase the digital
divide which is a social equity challenge (Marope et al., 2015) still experienced in our country.
The next chapter will explain in detail the research methodology employed in this study.
6 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
6.1 Introduction
The primary aim of the study was to explore the training and resource needs of TVET college
lecturers regarding remote learning and the possible implications of this for TVET college
leadership. An interpretivist paradigm was considered most suitable for the study. A paradigm
describes the worldview of the researcher (Mackenzie & Knipe, 2006). The paradigm, as a
conceptual lens, will thus influence the methodological choices for data collection and the
meaning or interpretation of the research data analysis (Kivunja & Kuyini, 2017). The interpretivist
worldview holds an assumption that “reality is socially constructed” (Merriam & Tisdell, 2015).
Reality does not exist in a single sense, but there are multiple ways of interpreting a single
event/reality. Interpretivism allows individuals to “seek an understanding of the world they live
and work in” (Creswell, 2013). The research develops subjective meanings based on unique
experiences, which are multiple and varied. Research using this paradigm thus takes an in-depth
look at the complexity of the subjective and negotiated views through social, historical and cultural
events of the research participants.
In the case of this research a subjective meaning was developed that TVET colleges lack
technological transformation, are still 100% contact learning institutions as compared to
universities, and do not have the resources and training to transform to be remote learning
institutions. Research approaches are defined generally as “plans and procedures” that are
followed, step by step, starting from the “broad assumptions” until we arrive at the detailed method
to be used for “data collection, analysis and interpretation” (Creswell & Creswell, 2017). The
approach utilised in the study was informed by the philosophical assumptions of the researcher,
the procedures used in the inquiry, the research problem being addressed, the researcher’s
personal experience and the perceived audiences of the study. The research design refers to
the type of inquiry situated in quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods approaches that provide
definitive guidance for proceedings to be followed in a research study. With relevance to the
33
current study, insight into the research problem was conducted through interaction with a TVET
college through a qualitative survey and qualitative semi-structured interviews with the HODs of
three different departments at a TVET college. Participants’ views were therefore crucial in
describing the training and resource needs of lecturers in respect of remote learning and the
implications of this for leadership from the HODs’ perspectives in one local TVET college.
The primary aim of the research is to explore the needs of TVET college lecturers in terms of the
resources and training required for remote learning. It also forms part of the broader agenda
which is staff professional development and the transformation of TVET colleges into 21st-century
learning institutions, so that they are in line with industries and businesses and become global
players in the skills development of the country and its workforce.
Qualitative research is used when studying any phenomenon in its natural setting. Creswell and
Creswell (2017) describe qualitative research as an “approach for exploring and understanding”
the meaning groups and individuals “ascribe to social; or human problems”. As the focus of this
study was on exploring the training and resource needs of TVET college lecturers towards remote
learning from the lecturers and the HODs’ perspective, this approach was considered appropriate
to arrive at possible answers.
Subsequently, a qualitative research design was considered. A research design refers to the
type of inquiry that is going to be employed, to give this research study a direction for the
procedures to be followed. Yin (2014) regards the research design to be the outline of the
methods used to gather and critically analyse the data to answer the research question. A generic
qualitative design was employed for this study, as a generic study claims no specific
methodological viewpoint and attempts to understand the phenomenon from the perspectives of
the participants (Caelli, Ray & Mill, 2003). Generic research is not bounded or restricted
sufficiently to be classified as a research methodology itself, however, it can use traits of other
research methods to create a unique methodology that will be suitable for a specific research
study (Kahlke, 2014).
34
6.4 Methods
Methods are generally viewed as all the techniques used to answer the research question (Wilson
& MacLean, 2010). These methods include how the participant selection took place and how
data were collected and analysed
The sample for this study was a purposively selected one. A purposive sample is a type of
sampling that gives leeway to the researcher to single out the groups or individuals who will be
knowledgeable and insightful regarding the phenomenon of interest (McMillan & Schumacher,
2014). Yin (2011) delineates purposive sampling as a population of the research that was chosen
deliberately to yield the most “relevant and plentiful data”. The purposively selected sample
comprised 73 TVET college lecturers in one campus of the accessible TVET college campuses
situated in Ekurhuleni, Gauteng. The purposive sample consisted of 73 lecturers, of whom 17
were from the NATED-Engineering Department, 21 from the NCV-Business Studies Department
and 35 from the NATED-Business Studies Department, as well as three HODs respectively from
each of these departments.
The TVET college lecturers were considered appropriate as a sample, as the aim of the study
was to understand the different needs of the lecturers in terms of resources and training for
remote learning as they stand in their differing subject offerings. The assumption was that the
needs of the lecturers would be different, depending on the nature of the courses and subjects
35
that they offer. I reasoned that understanding the needs of the lecturers for remote learning from
the standpoint of the lecturers would assist TVET college leaders to apply appropriate measures
when procuring resources and developing a training strategy/plan for the lecturers rather than
applying a “one-size-fits-all” approach (Wedekind, 2016).
The three departmental HODs from the respective departments were considered as information-
rich participants who would share their perceptions and experiences as the leaders in this
transition towards remote learning. These participants would be able to shed light on how the
HODs had been affected, and on the resources and training needs of the lecturers in their
departments. It was reasoned that the HODs’ perspectives on these aspects would aid in
achieving the third objective of this study, which was to propose guidelines for training and support
of lecturers moving towards remote learning by leadership at TVET colleges.
TVET colleges are still 100% contact learning institutions post the 2016 function shift of migrating
TVET colleges to the DHET. In 2020 there was a coronavirus outbreak that resulted in a hard
lockdown globally, which also saw all education departments having to suspend all contact
learning activities. The function shift came with the perception that TVET colleges would be
transformed to be like universities in terms of teaching and learning strategies and technological
advancement. The coronavirus pandemic exposed and exacerbated the need for TVET colleges
to transform from being 100% learning institutions to becoming e-learning or remote learning
institutions. We have witnessed how universities seamlessly transitioned from contact learning
to e-learning, yet to date, TVET colleges are still 100% contact learning institutions. This study
aims to understand what the training and resources needs are of TVET college lecturers for
remote learning and the implications of this for TVET college leadership. The study focuses on
understanding the needs of the lecturers and then proceeds to engage with the HODs to
understand their perception of the needs of the lecturers in their department, and how they
support or plan to support the lecturers. Finally, the study comes up with suggestions that will
help develop training guidelines for remote learning.
The study was conducted at a TVET college campus in Ekurhuleni, Gauteng. Grollman and
Rauner (2007) describe TVET college lecturers as teachers or lecturers who work in a formal
college setting, “giving instructions in vocational courses”. The following tables summarise the
demographic information of TVET college lecturers and HODs respectively.
36
Table 6.1: Demographic information of the lecturers
Department
1. NATED-Business Studies NATED-Engineering NCV
35 lecturers 17 lecturers 21 lecturers
Age
2. 18 - 24 25 - 34 35 – 44 45 – 54 Above 54
0 17 lecturers 18 lecturers 28 lecturers 10 lecturers
Gender
3. Female Male
42 lecturers 31 lecturers
Computer training/knowledge
6. Basic Moderate Expert
19 lecturers 42 lecturers 12 lecturers
Data collection for this study included a qualitative survey completed by purposively selected
TVET lecturers in order to describe lecturers’ views on their needs in moving towards remote
learning, and semi-structured qualitative interviews with purposively selected HODs to elicit their
views on this topic.
37
Dimond, Fiesler, DiSalvo, Pelc and Bruckman (2012) hold that face-to-face or traditional ways of
conducting interviews may not always be practical, especially when the participants are not at a
reachable distance. Given the current COVID-19 regulations, alternative ways to collect the
information via convenient alternatives like e-mails, instant messaging, telephones and multiple
other communication media were considered for this study.
Qualitative surveys are a data collection technique that collects data regarding the present
conditions or events of a group of participants (McMillan & Schumacher, 2014). Qualitative
surveys are mostly used to gain some insight into current events, experiences, “beliefs and
attitudes of the participants”. The format of the survey consisted of a section for biographical
details and statements concerning the main aspects related to needs and resources in moving
towards remote learning (see Appendix 3). Participants could respond by indicating their level of
agreement with the statements according to a Likert-type scale. The survey was structured into
three sections. Section A solicited the biographical information of the lecturers, Section B was
based on the training needs of the lecturers and Section C was based on the resource needs of
the lecturers. The survey was distributed through an online platform, using Google forms
because of COVID-19 social-distancing regulations. It was distributed to lecturers via email and
a link to the form was sent via WhatsApp.
The use of Google forms also came with the advantage that the data collected is immediately
simplified into MS Excel graphs, to make interpretation and analysis easy. The lecturers had to
give consent, agreeing to take part in the study before going through the survey (see Appendix
3). All participants returned their completed Google surveys which were summarised into graphs
that were used for interpretation and analysis.
Qualitative interviews are a data collection method that mainly solicits people’s views, opinions,
perceptions or perspectives and is seen as a “primary method used in qualitative research”
(Schultze & Avital, 2011). Qualitative interviews are seen as the most direct interaction between
a researcher and the participant and an attempt to tap into the perspective of the participant to
provide a deep description of the aspect under study (McMillan & Schumacher, 2014; Oltmann,
2016). Oltmann (2016) further mentions that a general expectation for good qualitative interviews
is that they should be face-to-face interviews but that other formats of interviewing such as
telephonic interviews have become increasingly common. A semi-structured interview was
considered most appropriate for the study. Semi-structured interviews are a mix of “more or less
structured interview questions” (Merriam & Tisdell, 2015). The interview script contained open-
38
ended questions and possible probing questions (see Appendix 4) in between. The questions
were flexible, were guided by the interview schedule and had no predetermined order or wording.
The interviews were conducted face-to-face with the three HODs and social distancing and
sanitising regulations were observed. Conducting face-to-face interviews allows for the presence
of visual cues, such as facial gestures and body postures as a means of “non-verbal
communication strategies” (Silvester, Anderson, Haddleton, Cunningham-Snell & Gibb, 2000),
as well as social cues, which allow the interviewer and interviewee to monitor the behaviour of
each other, allowing the interviewer to be cognisant of those unspoken words during the interview.
The interviews were approximately 45 minutes each.
Data analysis refers to how the collected data are going to be narrated and analysed in a
sufficient, detailed and accurate manner using data excerpts to substantiate the interpretations
made (McMillan & Schumacher, 2014). Data analysis aims at finding answers to the stated
research question through a structured, iterative process to arrive at patterns that are formed and
followed.
The numeric responses of the qualitative survey were reported narratively in the form of numbers
and percentages. The data analysis was divided into three sections namely: demographic
information and level of computer skills/knowledge; training needs and resources needs. The
survey results and the additional perceptions of the lecturers were incorporated with the overall
interpretation and findings, including the interview data and literature.
The main technique used to analyse the data was thematic analysis. Thematic analysis is
explained by Braun and Clarke (2006) as a qualitative data analysis method that allows for the
identification, analysis, arranging and reporting of data that has been arranged into themes and
patterns, after the data corpus has been critically reflected on deliberately and rigorously. The
analysis took place through six steps, namely:
39
b) “Generating initial codes”
After reading and rereading, codes were extracted comprising interesting data which needed
to be analysed. Full and equal attention was paid to collate the interview data with the survey
and the literature. Repeated patterns were recognised as I worked through the data
systematically and then formed the training guidelines that I needed to develop to meet my
objective.
6.8 Trustworthiness
Trustworthiness or rigour alludes to the standard of confidence in the research data, its
interpretation and the methodology utilised to ensure that the study is of good quality. It also
entails the protocols and procedures used to make the study worthy by its intended readers
(Connelly, 2016). Lincoln and Guba (1985) posit that the trustworthiness (validity and reliability)
of “naturalistic inquiry” consists of measures for credibility, transferability, dependability and
40
confirmability. The trustworthiness of the study was maintained in accordance with Lincoln and
Guba (1985) as follows:
Credibility indicates the “truth-value” of the findings, and I triangulated the findings from the
qualitative surveys with all lecturing staff, with findings from individual semi-structured interviews
with the HODs. I made use of member checking of the transcribed interviews. I also ensured
peer review by discussing all analyses and findings with the research supervisor.
Transferability indicates the possible transfer to other contexts. As this study was conducted at
one specific campus, I made use of a detailed description of the planning and implementation of
the study, as well as carefully reflecting on what the issues are that need to be considered when
interpreting the findings in this specific context. The detailed participant description and setting
selection, the data-collection and analysis procedures, and critical interpretation of findings may
allow for the transfer of such studies to other similar TVET college campuses.
Dependability shows that findings are accurate, consistent and likely to be repeated. All the data
collection protocols were observed, and they were followed by coding and quality checks using
the “thematic analysis” steps outlined by Braun and Clarke (2006). In-depth descriptions of the
“overlapping methods” (Shenton, 2004) (qualitative survey and interviews) used allowed for the
study to be repeated and the same results produced. An audit trail of the entire research process
is available.
Confirmability provides evidence that the study attempted to be truthful as to the findings and
that researchers report on the study as objectively as possible. As I am a lecturer at the TVET
college, and the participants are known to me, I had to ensure that I reflected on findings using
available evidence in the form of literature and collected research data. To guard against possible
researcher bias (personal assumptions, values, biases, characteristics and preferences) I
ensured that the research methods employed (triangulation) were described adequately and all
the research data was kept safely for future reference and/or analysis as well as to have an “audit
trail” (Shenton, 2004). The qualitative survey was shared with three fellow colleagues from three
different TVET colleges, to give guidance and feedback on whether the survey was in any way
subjective. Their feedback and suggested changes were applied in the survey to ensure that it
was transferable and not biased.
41
6.9 Role of the researcher
Qualitative research aims to explore, comprehend and find the meaning of how “individuals or
groups ascribe” to everyday human and “social problems” (Creswell, 2013). As a researcher, I
am a human instrument of data collection (Simon, 2011), therefore, my aim as the researcher of
this study is to gather, analyse, interpret and reflect on the collected data in order to understand
the resources and training needs of TVET college lecturers towards remote learning and the
implications of this for leadership. Greenbank (2003) holds that the researcher as the data
collector needs to explain explicably all the “relevant aspects” regarding themselves and the role
they play regarding all aspects of the study. I am a computer studies lecturer at a TVET college,
responsible for the student's achievements, skills and knowledge in computer applications,
making sure that their education journey is successful, and fulfilling all my classroom
administration within the stipulated timeframes. My relationship with the research participants is
a professional one; we are colleagues within the same education sector. The HODs are the
immediate leaders after the program managers who are also lecturers. My role as a researcher
in the study was, however, neither as lecturer nor as subordinate to the HODs, but merely as a
researcher and a collector of data, analyst and interpreter to understand a phenomenon.
My expectations are to see TVET colleges advancing to the 21st-century teaching modes,
capacitating lecturers with needed resources and training to migrate from 100% face-to-face
teaching to facilitating remote learning. My experience as a computer studies lecturer, seeing
and understanding first-hand the sudden impact of the cessation of 100% contact teaching
brought about by the COVID-19 lockdown, qualifies me to conduct the research. As the primary
research instrument in the research, my background as a lecturer should be treated as a bias
(Maxwell, 2012). The way I interpret the data, my beliefs, assumptions and bias could affect the
way the data is analysed (Strauss & Corbin, 1998). I have identified that the following biases
might influence this research:
x My lack of resources as a computer studies lecturer and not being able to reach out to
students except through face-to-face contact from the time of the hard lockdown in March
2020 until the present.
x My expectation to see TVET colleges transform their teaching and learning strategies and
technological advancement like universities have done, since they belong to the same
department (the DHET).
42
x My experience at the college seeing how most lecturers are not computer literate and require
assistance to carry out their classroom administration.
As a means to reduce bias in the final results of the study, all the data collected including survey
summary charts, excerpts of additional comments, interview transcripts and audio have been
made available to validate all the responses received from participants and the findings of the
study (Maxwell, 2012). Furthermore, to guard against possible researcher bias (personal
assumptions, values, biases, characteristics and preferences) I ensured that the research
methods employed (triangulation) will be described adequately and all the research data will be
kept safely for future reference and/or analysis as well as to have an “audit trail” (Shenton, 2004).
Research ethics are the considerations of what is wrong and right regarding conducting the
research study. Ethical considerations ensure that the conduct of the research/researcher
conforms to “generally accepted norms and values and are morally acceptable” (Mouton, 2013).
The research conducted conforms to the following norms and standards:
At the beginning of the online survey questionnaire, before the first section opened, the lecturers
were required to give consent to take part in the study voluntarily after they had read through the
information about the study (see Appendix 3). The HODs who took part in the interviews were
given the “informed consent” and the “video, audio or photographic recording” permission forms
from the University of Johannesburg to sign and to give their consent. Samples of the consent
forms used are attached to the report as Appendix 5, however, the completed and signed forms
are available with the research to keep the identity of the HODs who took part in the study
confidential. The information in the consent forms was adapted to accommodate the participants’
level of language and comprehension, making sure that they understood what the study was
about and that they were voluntarily taking part in a study without coercion and not under duress.
The participants were informed that they could request access to the research report before it is
published but they did not take up that option. The permission to conduct the research at the
college was applied for and granted. The written permission letter was attached to the research
report as Appendix 2. The research participants were all over the age of 18 years, therefore did
not require parental consent and/or supervision.
43
Potential risks
The study had a low potential health risk as there was limited face-to-face contact between the
participants and the researcher as the qualitative survey was conducted online instead of in face-
to-face interviews. Where face-to-face interviews were conducted, the participants did not
experience any discomfort and harm and all COVID-19 protocols were observed i.e., social
distancing was observed during the interviews and the researcher and participants sanitised their
hands before and after the interview. The recording device was also sanitised after each
interview.
The personal information of the research participants will be kept confidential, the signed consent
forms will also be kept with the researcher. The Google forms survey utilised is programmed not
to collect the e-mail addresses of the respondents or their names, to keep their responses strictly
confidential and anonymous. The research participants were kept abreast of the proceedings of
the study, to make them feel at ease and willingly participate in the study. The research findings
and conclusion will be made available to all participants who wish to be kept informed.
Ethical measures
The identity of the lecturers that took part in the survey is completely anonymous and the online
form did not collect lecturers’ e-mail addresses. The names of the HODs are completely
confidential and have been removed from the interview transcripts. All the names of the
participants are known to the researcher but will not be revealed to the university or the college.
However, because of the nature of their position, they could be identifiable by a person who
knows the TVET college campus. The names of the departments are mentioned to provide
context to the study, however, the names mentioned during the interviews have been removed
and replaced with pseudonyms.
Potential benefits
The study is worthwhile and will benefit all the lecturers and HODs who have participated in the
study as it will make them more aware of possible needs and strengths in their institution in
moving towards remote learning. Apart from the institution becoming more relevant to teaching
and learning, given the current state of affairs, leadership may also be assisted in developing
unique teaching and learning strategies and the proposed training guidelines will come in handy
for other TVET colleges.
44
6.11 Summary
Chapter 6 constitutes the methodological aspects of the research study. The study was located
in an interpretivist worldview, embraced a qualitative research approach, and a generic qualitative
research design was employed as it was best suited to arrive at answers to the research
questions. The sampling of the study comprised lecturers of three different departments at a
TVET college campus in Ekurhuleni, Gauteng as well as HODs of three different departments at
the same college. The sampling was purposive, as it was reasoned that the selected participants
would be most appropriate for the aim of this study and would provide rich views and information
about the issue. Data collection occurred using a qualitative survey and qualitative, semi-
structured interviews. The data were analysed applying thematic analysis. Trustworthiness
measures, namely: credibility, transferability, dependability and confirmability were adhered to, to
ensure trustworthiness. All ethical considerations were considered, starting with applying for
clearance with UJ, to applying for permission to conduct research at the college. The safety,
well-being and confidentiality of all the participants were maintained and all additional
documentation has been attached to this research report as appendices for an audit trail.
In Chapter 7, I will critically present the findings and interpretation of the data gathered during this
study.
Chapter 7 details the results of the analysis of collected data for this study titled: Professional
development needs of TVET college lecturers towards remote learning: Implications for
leadership. In the previous chapter, a detailed discussion of the research design and
methodology employed in this study was rendered. An exploratory generic qualitative research
design was used to explore the resource and training needs of TVET college lecturers for remote
learning. The focal point of this chapter is to present the results of the analysis and to interpret
the findings of the study. The data was gathered through a qualitative survey and qualitative
semi-structured interviews. The obtained data were analysed using the steps of thematic analysis
as explained in section 6.7. The themes and sub-themes identified will now be presented and
discussed with supporting literature assimilated to support the findings of the study.
45
7.2 Findings from the qualitative survey
Seventy-three TVET college lecturers participated in the completion of the qualitative survey out
of a possible 90 lecturers, which calculates to an 81.1% response rate. To protect the privacy
and confidentiality of the lecturers no names and email addresses were collected when
conducting the survey. The respondents’ additional written responses reported are unedited and
therefore they might not be grammatically correct.
Analysis of the responses of the qualitative survey was structured and discussed according to
the following:
The graphical summary of the survey responses is included in Appendix 7 and will be referred to
in the discussion.
In terms of the computer skills/knowledge of the lecturers, it was found that 42 (57.5%) of the
lecturers have moderate skills/knowledge, followed by 19 (26.1%) with basic knowledge and 12
(16.4%) with expert knowledge.
46
The graph below summarises the computer training/knowledge level of the lecturers:
Regarding the aforementioned and Figure 7.1, it is clear that the level of computer skills needs
to be addressed as such skills are a basic requirement for the shift from face-to-face to remote
learning to be possible and successful.
Training Needs
With reference to Appendix 7, participants mostly agreed that they needed training in specific
computer programs to enable them to work remotely. In respect of reporting the results, the
categories “completely agree” and “agree” were consolidated into the category indicating
agreement. Regarding MS Word, 41.1% of the lecturers agreed that they needed training, whilst
27.4% disagreed and 12.5% indicated that training in MS Word did not apply to their subject
offering. In terms of MS Excel and MS PowerPoint, many lecturers (67%) agreed that they
needed training, whilst 11% disagreed and 6.8% indicated that it was not applicable. The results
show that 75.3 % of the lecturers indicated that they needed training in connecting to the college
network, be it a wired or wireless connection as this would be required if they were to work
independently on- or off-site.
Lecturers were in strong agreement that they needed training in online teaching approaches
(80.9%) and aligning digital educational content to existing curricula (83.5%). Lecturers also
indicated with strong agreement (80.8%) that they needed training in video conferencing and
47
presenting lessons online. Given that TVET colleges are generally more practical in their
pedagogy owing to the nature of the courses and subjects they offer, the migration towards more
remote learning would require such training for the learning to take place successfully online.
Lecturers clearly indicated they needed training in graphics and demonstrations on online
learning (87.8% in agreement), in creating interactive e-teaching content (86.2%) and in online
collaboration (76.7%). Lecturers indicated their need for online learning activity management
(80.8%); assessment of learning activities with the right online tools (83.5%); coordinating and
monitoring assessment (83.6%); and assessing, grading and capturing of marks online (78.9%).
Lecturers were also in strong agreement (78.1%) that they must be able to set official, two-way
communication channels with students, using e-mails and the learning platform tool; and be able
to provide feedback (83.5%). Furthermore, lecturers agreed that simulations (74%) and e-
assessments (80.8%) needed specialised software and/or add-ins. When remote learning takes
place, lecturers need to be competent in setting lessons for face-to-face and remote learning.
Respondents agreed (76.7%) that they needed to be subject experts to know which content would
be delivered face-to-face and which content would be delivered remotely. Owing to the practical
nature of TVET colleges, it would be an added advantage to have and use interactive
whiteboards. This has an advantage for both face-to-face and remote learning. The lesson can
be recorded as it takes place and then uploaded onto the online learning site, for students to have
access to it anytime and anywhere. Of the lecturers who responded, 75.3% agree that they
indeed needed training on using interactive whiteboards. Fewer lecturers indicated the need for
additional training on using data projectors, video cameras, speakers and microphones: 54.8%
of the lecturers agreed that they needed training in data projectors, while 56.2% agreed they
needed training on video cameras and only 46.5% indicated they required training on the use of
speakers and microphones.
Moving to online learning will require TVET colleges to have a learning management system, e-
learning sites, software and tools. However, other open-sourced software, apps and sites can be
used as additional or main support, depending on the discretion of the college. The lecturers
indicated that they needed expert training in the readily available applications and sites to present
their subjects remotely. The readily available sites received the following responses: MS Teams:
61.6%, Zoom: 56.2%, YouTube: 52.1%, Skype: 37% and 5% of lecturers opted for training in
other online platforms.
48
Resource needs
For remote learning to take place, a desktop or laptop computer with high-quality capabilities is
essential according to 91.7% of the responding lecturers. A high percentage (90.4%) of the
lecturers indicated that they had a desktop or laptop that is adequate for remote learning. Fewer
lecturers (84.9%) agreed that interactive whiteboards are essential for remote learning. As far as
the necessity of using data projectors for remote learning, 71.2% of the lecturers agreed, 13.7%
of the lecturers somewhat agreed and 15.1% disagreed that it is essential in their subject offering.
Most lecturers (91.8%) agreed that video cameras were essential for recording and enhancing
lessons and that recorded lessons should be uploaded on the e-learning site, leaving 8.2%
agreeing somewhat, but no one disagreeing. Most lecturers are in strong agreement that video
cameras (91.8%), speakers and microphones (97.2%), and light pens and scanners (93.2%) are
essential, leaving only a small fraction of lecturers somewhat agreeing and almost no one
disagreeing with their essentiality for remote learning.
In terms of broadband internet access, 94.5% of lecturers agreed that is a basic requirement. For
fast and strong internet access, 97.3% of lecturers agreed that broadband internet access is a
requirement and 94.6% agreed that 24/7 off-site access was essential. When asked if the
college/campus had an adequate online learning platform, 63% of lecturers disagreed, 19.2%
said they completely agreed and 11% agreed somewhat. Regarding the need for multimedia
projectors with white screens as being essential for remote learning, 87.6% of lecturers agreed,
with 9.6% partially agreeing. Interactive software as a need for remote learning received 98.6%
of agreement from the lecturers. Additional storage devices serving as backups and storage
media that can be moved around and accessed anytime received 93.2% of lecturers in
agreement. The idea of installing electric and network points at strategic areas around the
campus and in the classrooms was met with 90.4% agreement and 93.1% agreed with regards
to having network points. Having links to educational websites, digital libraries and e-journals at
the touch of a button are regarded as an advantage for both lecturers and students to have access
to resources by 95.9% of lecturers, leaving just 4.1% somewhat agreeing.
Next, we are going to take a critical and reflective look at the interview data, linking it with the
survey data and literature.
The semi-structured interviews were conducted one-on-one with three HODs at the TVET college
campus. To maintain the privacy and confidentiality of the college and the participants, the actual
49
names of the college, campus and the HODs are not mentioned. The responses of the HODs
were not edited and are reported verbatim which may not always comply with grammar principles.
The interview audio transcripts are included in Appendix 8.
The focus of the interviews was to explore the HOD’s perceptions and experiences regarding the
needs of the lecturers in their departments as well as possible leadership issues relating to how
the lecturers in their departments could be supported towards remote learning and teaching. The
following themes were proposed to organise the analysed data from the interviews (see Table 5).
50
A detailed discussion of the themes and sub-themes is presented using the following keys to
represent the three HODs’ from different departments. HOD 1, HOD 2, and HOD 3. Verbatim
quotations from the transcribed interviews will be presented with the letter L which indicates line,
and the line number in numeric format. An example would be the key HOD 1 L7 which indicates
the data was generated from the interview with HOD 1 and the line referred to it in the interview
is line 7.
The presentation of the findings from the interviews follows from the following pattern:
The interview data in terms of the identified themes are discussed with reference to the
verbatim responses;
Hereafter, the appropriate findings from the survey data with the lecturers that relate to this
finding are also integrated. The findings will be represented using the following legend:
L=Lecturer; 1=the number of the lecturer survey.
The literature will also be used to justify the findings throughout.
The training needs for lecturers to move towards remote learning include pedagogical training,
basic computer training, e-learning platform training and other subject-specific training. The
expectation was that as I was considering opinions of both lecturers and HODs from the different
departments at one TVET college, a “one-size-fits-all” training approach would not be suitable as
Wedekind (2015) premised, but possibly be nuanced within the following sub-themes:
The rapid advance of the “digital revolution requires continuous skilling and reskilling” of lecturers
through “life-long learning” (Kanwar, Balasubramanian & Carr, 2019). Lecturers may therefore
require training to use a computer to prepare lessons, carry out administration duties, access the
remote learning platform, present and record lessons for the students using digital tools and
programs. Lecturers should be able to adapt to the changing times and be competent enough to
provide detailed feedback to the students online, and also be competent in two-way
communication with students and. The HODs interviewed stated that although training was
offered for the departments, the training needs of the lecturers were not necessarily met. The
HODs stated that:
51
“… they said who wants Excel training? So everybody will say yes, they only
gave the opportunity to program managers.” (HOD 1 L174–176)
“We did request that a lot of our lecturers requested training in computers. But
it hasn’t been addressed yet.” (HOD 1 L190–191)
This is echoed by the findings in the survey data from the lecturers, where they indicated that
57.5% have moderate computer training/knowledge and when we look further, more than 50%
of the lecturers agreed that they needed training in MS Excel and MS PowerPoint, and about
40% agreed that they needed training in MS Word. Lecturers also commented in the open-
ended questions that they felt that they lacked skills and required training. They stated:
“No full formal training for computer related courses, rely on personal, peer
and inservice.” (Lecturer 25)
“In my teacher training years (1983 to 1987) Colleges and Universities did
not train teachers in computers. I had register in typing … later N4 and N5
Computer skills. Even currently we NOT trained in remote learning.”
(Lecturer 37)
“Technology is the way to go and we need to face the fact that most of our
lecturers are not computer literate and now is the time to change and be
ready with technology.” (Lecturer 47)
One HOD was also of the opinion that if and when training was offered, it was not that
beneficial.
“Some of them went for ICDL. And they did Excel… it wasn’t very successful.”
(HOD 2 L91–92)
It also appeared that a lack of coordination of the training was experienced as another HOD
commented that although training was offered, she was not sure who was invited to the
training:
52
“If I remember very well, last year, there was training for Excel, how to use an
Excel [spreadsheet]. I think they were also invited on that training.” (HOD 3
L107–108)
The additional comments from the lecturers indicated a potential strength in this specific TVET
college as they are of the opinion that lecturers are also eager and open to learning new ways
of teaching and learning, not only to comply but also to enhance themselves and stay relevant
with the changing times. The potential motivation of lecturers to move forward to becoming
proficient in remote learning and technology is evident in comments like:
“I am a very detailed person who gives attention to details and I should safely say
I’m a perfectionist. When given support, I do my best.” (Lecturer 13)
“I am a hard working person and willing to learn some information.” (Lecturer 42)
“I have moderate experience with computers as I only get a chance to teach part-
time.” (Lecturer 47)
This bodes well for this specific TVET college as Coughlin and Lemke (1999) state: “the key to
success isn’t in the computers … It is liberated educators’ whose understanding and creative
use of technology can help them to achieve the undreamed-of level of excellence for themselves
and their students.” As seen in the data, lecturers are prepared to be involved in their own
training and development and according to Bigum (2000) unless educators are adequately
prepared with required computer/IT skills, schools are wasting time and money.
Lastly, Russell, Finger and Russell (2000) argue that computer skills should no longer be seen
as a “minimum standard for teachers”, but rather as a professional development continuum, to
keep pace with “rapid changes in technology”, which is essential for TVET college lecturers to
transition towards remote learning.
Remote learning training comprises training lecturers to be experts in their subject matter, but
lecturers also need to learn “education, computer science and behaviour” (Saadé et al., 2007)
related theories. They should be able to adjust their role and character traits, develop varying
communication skills, creativity and develop broader competencies relating to computers to fit
into the new learning environment. Lecturers are currently faced with an array of unprecedented
expatiations of linking academics with technology (Roney, Donnelly, Dove, Tiffany-Morales,
53
Adelman & Zucker, 2002). Evidence shows that lecturers need training in one or more of the
prerequisites for the e-learning part of remote learning to take place. Regarding the training
already received by the lecturers, the HODs said:
“They [lecturers] had training last year for Teams, Microsoft Teams, … But I
can tell you now if you have to ask a lecturer now to connect to Teams that we
have a meeting, half of them won’t know. And the other half, didn't have a
laptop. So they will join with the desktop and not have any sound. So I just
feel we we are forgetting that the lecturers, we assume lecturers know, but
they don’t. So we need to train them constantly.” (HOD 1 L237–243)
“It was only Teams that I know of …The other ones [lecturers] had just did their
thing and try to do their own thing.” (HOD 2 L85–86)
From HOD 1 and HOD 2, we have learnt that some lecturers received training in MS Teams, but
the training was not successful. It is therefore still a need to be fulfilled by the college for its
lecturers. It is inevitable that 100% face-to-face learning should come to an end and that TVET
colleges need to have a remote learning platform. Vrasida (2015) says that there is a need for
supportive factors for lecturers to be competent and such factors include staff readiness. To
ensure staff readiness, TVET college leaders need to ensure that lecturers receive “adequate
training and support in ICT and pedagogy” (Yunus, 2007). This extends to empowering lecturers,
upskilling and building their confidence to be able to implement ICT-integrated teaching (Yuen &
Ma, 2002).
Taking a look at the survey responses, the majority of lecturers (more than 70%) strongly agreed
that they needed training on teaching approaches to present their subjects online. They needed
to know how to align digital educational content to existing curricula; how to use video
conferencing to present lessons online; how to create graphics, audio and animation to liven up
lessons; how to create online tutorials; how to create interactive e-teaching content; how to
collaborate with students and how to manage, evaluate, grade, coordinate and monitor online
lessons and assessments. More than 80% of lecturers also agreed that they needed training on
setting official, two-way communication channels with students and how to provide feedback.
Furthermore, 61.1% of the lecturers agreed that they required training in MS Teams as well as
other software that can be used for educational purposes. Figure 7.2 is a graph generated from
the survey showing the online learning platforms that lecturers require training in.
54
Figure 7.2: Online software tools for remote learning that lecturers require training in
The above graph gives us an overview or idea of the training needs of lecturers for remote
learning to take place, according to the lecturers. It extends to show the yearning desire and
eagerness that lecturers have in being competent enough for remote learning. And lastly, the
desire and eagerness of being trained are also voiced in the lecturers’ comments regarding the
need for and importance of remote learning training:
“Upskilling in lieu of the new ICT Developments for efficient subject matter delivery is
a must.” (Lecturer 46)
“I am a hardworker and I believe that the world is changing and we can’t ignore that …
Remote learning is a necessity to our today’s life.” (Lecturer 57)
“Through remote learning, some learners may encounter challenges retaining learned
content. I need sufficient skills to develop curriculum that will engage and motivate my
learners to fully participate. I need to develop skills to help learners to fully engage
according to their individual learning abilities as they are different.” (Lecturer 13)
Online teaching is a must especially taking into consideration that Covid-19 is here to
stay. So training is needed.” (Lecturer 49)
“I need training on how to present lectures online as we are now moving toward 5th
generation and we need to keep up with technology as TVET colleges. Covid-19 was
an eye opener for such as most of the colleges were not ready for online learning.”
(Lecturer 46)
55
x Practical subject lecturers receiving the same training as theory lecturers
The nature of courses and subjects that are offered at TVET colleges vary, some are “theoretical,
practical and educational” (Wedekind, 2016), resulting in lecturers needing training that will vary
depending on their subject offering. Some subjects will require the use of multimedia-enhanced
features to create or combine “text, graphics, audio and animation” (Ali, 2020), to liven up and
demonstrate classroom lessons that cannot be explained and comprehended with text only. Ali
(2020) explains that online learning/ICT tools help students have a better understanding of the
instructions and materials, and also implement “virtual experiments” that could be expensive,
time-consuming and perilous to conduct in a physical classroom or school laboratory. When the
HODs were asked if lecturers should receive the same training, they said:
“No I think you need to train different lecturers because different ways,
because a lecturer who doesn’t know computer must first be taught the basics,
and then go on to remote learning. Well, a lecturer who knows a computer
well can just go on to remote learning and show be shown the different
techniques.” (HOD 1 L327–330)
“Yes, I think so … Remember, for practical, I am just thinking now. Yes. so,
for computer, you can give them the background and the theory part.” (HOD 2
L105–106)
HOD 1 and HOD 2 hold differing views regarding the training to be received by lecturers,
depending on the varying nature of the subjects offered. Contrasting the HODs’ responses and
the survey responses from the lecturers, regarding their subject requiring simulation software
and e-assessment software, more than 90% of the lecturers agreed that they would need
additional supporting software training owing to the nature of their subjects.
HOD 3 explained that in the department they only teach students the theory part of the subject
and the practical part is dealt with when they do their in-service training. HOD 3 said:
“Fortunately enough in our department here we’re teaching only theory even
if the subject are more practical but its theory.” (HOD 3 L69-70)
This means that all the lecturers in this department might have almost the same subject training
needs.
Lastly, lecturers are faced with daily challenges based on the differing subject offerings. The
following lecturers have voiced their training needs based on the subject matter they deal with
daily:
56
“I need to be trained on how to use the overhead projector.” (Lecturer 15)
“How student can create or load companies on Sage pastel for themselves.”
(Lecturer 2)
While some lecturers will be able to adjust and transition seamlessly to remote learning, some
will require the college leaders to take a personal interest in them for the long-term development
of the college. A good leader also accords followers opportunities to learn and grow themselves
individually and collectively. In the challenges and limitations of the study (section 5.9.5), we
have learnt that there are those lecturers who belong to a generation that doesn’t know,
understand or use technological devices. From the survey responses, 26% of the lecturers had
basic computer knowledge. The challenge in this regard is that lecturers with limited or no
computer training background will have a hard time adapting to the shift and getting adequate
competence, confidence and self-efficacy because of their age and lack of speed in learning.
This is also because 13.7% of lecturers are above the age of 54 years which may lead to them
feeling uncertain and ambivalent about the change (Piderit, 2000). These lecturers need
continuous support until they can be competent and confident enough for remote and e-learning
altogether. Regarding the training and support given to older lecturers, the HODs said:
“It is very difficult because a lecturer would say to me, we don’t have Wi-Fi.
So I said we don’t have Wi-Fi you are talking about internet. So they confuse
Wi-Fi with the internet and don’t really know how it works. What I normally do
is ask them to go to a computer lecturer if they need to do tasks there and then
collaborate … But the collaboration hasn’t happened yet. We need the
younger lecturers, they are so keen to do that because it makes sense not to
work hard and to work smarter.” (HOD 1 L276-284)
“… they [older lecturers] had one training on Microsoft Teams. And that was
that, it was just to assist them for meetings, but not for actually designing and
have a visual lesson how to know how to do visualization.” (HOD 2 L78–80)
57
“…if they’ve got any challenges of how to print we’ve got IT here, IT manager
here. If now I can’t be able to help them. Maybe they can’t print, they are
having challenges then I will just ask IT manager to come and assist them, I
will also assist them if I know how.” (HOD 3 L80–83)
The role played by the HODs in supporting older lecturers in this regard is inadequate, it requires
support and assistance to come from the primary leaders, in a form of professional development
of the college. The revolution that we have seen of ICT serves as a challenge for educators’
professional development, this challenge constrains the possibility of lecturers developing “new
and innovative computer-supportive pedagogical practices” (Hakkarainen, Muukonen, Lipponen,
Ilomäki, Rahikainen & Lehtinen, 2001). The rapidly changing “economic, professional and
political” world brings with it constant and unstoppable technological advancement which
requires modern society to acquire “knowledge and develop skills of adaptability, flexibility and
cooperation” (Tente & Moustakas, 2019) to survive and evolve. This unstoppable evolution
requires the enrichment and renewal of existing knowledge and skills through lifelong learning,
regardless of age, skills, knowledge and profession. The prevalent new world order requires
every lecturer to participate in every stage of their lives, rather than having to separate lecturers
into those who are competent or incompetent with the use of modern ICT means and tools.
Lecturers have to learn technical skills appropriate enough to use ICT tools productively, they
should furthermore be able to “instruct and guide the students to use ICT purposefully and
generatively” (Hakkarainen et al., 2001). Lecturers not only have to become familiar with ICT,
but they also need to attain the pedagogical expertise essential for conductively working with
new technology-based learning environments. Lecturers need to explore and develop new
teaching and learning pedagogical methods to facilitate higher-level knowledge acquisition skills
and the college leaders are the enablers of lecturers acquiring all the skills and knowledge
needed by lecturers.
Lastly, HOD 2 holds the opinion that it is up to the lecturers to willingly ask for additional support
and training that they need for their subject needs. HOD 2 said:
“It boils down to me, you cannot support somebody that doesn’t want to be
supported. And that comes with the attitude of the lecturers.” (HOD 2 L62–64)
Lecturers have shown the willingness and enthusiasm to learn, however, there are inadequate
structures and guidelines at the moment that informs how or where the lecturers could get the
support. This is echoed in this comment made by lecturer 37:
58
“In my teacher training years (1983 to 1987) Colleges and Universities did not train
teachers in computers. I had register in typing … later N4 and N5 Computer skills.
Even currently we NOT trained in remote learning.” (Lecturer 37)
Resources for remote learning are very important, as there is no way that lecturers can perform
their teaching and learning duties without having adequate resources. ICT support from the
college in terms of “infrastructure and tools, hardware and software support systems” (Ali, 2020)
is very pertinent. The hardware required includes, depending on the nature of the course and
subject matter, “laptops, projectors, tablets, smartphones, iPads and interactive whiteboards” (Ali,
2020). Lecturers also need to have sufficient “broadband and connected devices” onsite and off-
site for online learning (World Bank, 2020). The following sub-themes will give us an idea of
what the HODs and lecturers had to add regarding the resources needed for remote learning.
Hardware and software are the vehicles that will connect the lecturers to the students on- and
off-site the campus. There are varying hardware and software resources that are essential for
remote learning to take place. The HODs opinions regarding hardware resources were as
follows:
“Well, they now got the laptops and they got data, they got routers, . . . I think
what now the devices that they need is printers because now it’s a different
case.” (HOD 1 L350–353)
HOD 1 says that the college has given lecturers laptops and routers to use for remote learning.
When we take a look at the survey, 91.7% of lecturers were in agreement that a desktop or
laptop computer is essential for remote learning. Furthermore, 90.4% of lecturers agreed that
they have a desktop or laptop computer that is adequate for remote learning. This is a step in
the right direction as the TVET colleges prepare to migrate from 100% face-to-face learning to
remote learning.
“I think like, a video camera? I don’t know nowadays, what do they use, you
know, but for me, I think it must be a video camera, because you have to stand
in front of the class. And somebody needs to video you so that you can send
that to the students.” (HOD 2 L137–140)
“The college was going to make videos, lecturers they were going to set up at
M-Campus because M-Campus has a multimedia centre.” (HOD 1 L416-417)
HOD 1 and HOD 2 said that lecturers would need a video camera to record their lessons. I
concur with this notion as the recorded lessons can be useful to the students, both in class and
remotely. The recording of lessons through video can take different forms. Firstly, through video-
taping a live session as the lecturer is standing in a classroom conducting a lesson,
demonstration or an experiment. Secondly, through recording the screen of the computer or
laptop as the lecturer is demonstrating a lesson through a computer, which will require the
recording device to be embedded on the computer or laptop and this functionality is available
using Zoom, MS Teams and MS PowerPoint. The other hardware devices needed by lecturers
are the printers to provide hardcopies of presentations and notes to the students. I perceive both
printers and video cameras as important in the sense that they can both provide students with
the means to study remotely, i.e., students can get hard copies of the lessons, notes,
demonstrations etcetera or they can watch the recorded lessons. This also allows the learning
content to be presented over a longer period as compared to the limited time in the physical
classroom, thus enabling education to be “seven days and twenty-four hours” (Mpu & Adu, 2019).
Learning becomes independent of place and time and reaches more students than it would in a
physical classroom (Dziuban, Hartman & Moskal, 2004).
“The only device I can think of is that when that guy came and make made a
demonstration. I don’t know what they call the thing. The one way you can
present the textbook on the screen.” (HOD 2 L223–225)
Taking a closer looker at how a scanner can be beneficial for learning remotely, I found that a
scanner is a computer input device that converts a hard copy or image from printed media into
an electronic computer file. It is utilised to access information by integrating it with other
technology devices (Sah, 2010). Scanners are important for lecturers as they help convert
60
important teaching and learning material from paper to digital format, which can also be sent to
students through the remote/e-learning platform, such as reference material scanned from a
textbook. With reference to the survey, 93.2% of lecturers agreed that light pens and scanners
are essential for remote learning which concurs with HOD 2’s comment that indeed they are
needed for remote learning.
Lastly, Lecturer 3 suggested that colleges also look into using Ultrabooks for remote learning:
Ultrabooks are in the category of laptops but are thinner and serve to bridge the gap between
tablets and conventional laptop computers. They are said to have better video performance,
storage and memory and have larger screen sizes (Jackson, 2012). These added advantages
mean more performance time for the lecturers and having a better quality video means that
lecturers can create better quality videos for the students.
Remote learning requires software support systems that incorporate “text, graphics, audio and
animation” (Ali, 2020), to liven up lessons that require or will be well explained and demonstrated
with more than just text (Thomas & Israel, 2013). The lecturers need to be competent and
confident enough to use these teaching and learning interfaces and must have unlimited access
to them. During the discussions regarding the software for remote learning, that will aid lecturers
to present their lessons successfully the HODs said:
“There was another one. I’ll just, I don’t know if it was Moodle . . . But
apparently Brightspace, and it’s not a company. It’s a software program that
you buy through someone else. Because I’ve been doing some research on
that. But I know previously, Moodle was one of them.” (HOD 1 L363–367)
“But I’m just thinking about training like PowerPoint and things like that to make
your lesson more presentable.” (HOD 2 L140-142)
“. . . we’ve got the publishers that are coming. With these publishers, they’re
coming with the, with the software of which now at least now will give us the
videos where it is going to be easy for us to show the students. (HOD 3 L156–
158)
The HODs mentioned software like Moodle, BrightSpace and MS PowerPoint as some software
programs that can be utilised by lecturers for remote learning. Looking at the survey, in terms
61
of the interactive software for remote learning, 98.6% of lecturers agreed that it is an essential
requirement. The same applies to the use of electronic simulation software which 93.2% of
lecturers agreed was essential. There is no clear and preferred software as the honours of
selecting the appropriate software, which will serve all the teaching and learning needs of the
college, lies with its leaders.
There is a dire need at TVET colleges for software programs that will be compatible with the
courses and subjects that are offered. It is therefore up to the leaders to conduct a study, in
search of suitable software or software developers that will be best suited for the college. There
is an unprecedented increase in the number of online, open-source software. Pappas (2015)
outlines the top open-source learning management systems, they include, inter alia, Moodle,
Chamilo, Open edX, Totara Learn and Canvas. These software packages are also compatible
with mobile smartphones and are user friendly.
Many learning sites are coming online that lecturers are not aware of, sites related to TVET
colleges, such as the Future Managers Website. Such sites serve as a source for additional
references that lecturers do not have immediate access to. TVET colleges can form a
partnership and collate these websites for the lecturers and load links for lecturers on the
teaching and learning site, to save lecturers time when combing through droves of internet sites
for relevant sources. Educational sites also have updates to all the market trends that will also
aid in keeping the lecturers up to date. Having access to other educational sites serves as an
advantage to the lecturers which will also extend to the students. Students will know which sites
to visit which are relevant to them to get information relating to their studies.
Connectivity is among the most important factors to be considered for remote learning. World
Bank (2020) posits that lecturers should have adequate access to broadband and connected
devices at home and the institution for the e-learning environment and be able to communicate
with students and parents as the lack thereof will result in students not being able to learn online.
Our focal point as a point of departure is to make sure that lecturers are ready with all the
resources they need for remote learning. Upon interacting with the HODs regarding data and
connectivity, they said:
“Well, they now got the laptops and they got data, they got the routers, they
gave them.” (HOD 1 L350–351)
62
“. . . the lecturers are having the resources now they do have the laptop, they
do have the data.” (HOD 3 L27–28)
“They give them the data. So far, everything is fine. No one came in report that
their data they are not working. Fortunately enough, the Head Office, they
give them the laptop with the data.” (HOD 3 L260–262)
“Well, the connectivity has improved, ehm, in a sense of, the internet was
upgraded and all those things.” (HOD 1 L496–497)
“There is an IT manager that manages it. And when they have request from
lecturers, you can go through the IT manager and through procurement.”
(HOD 2 L284–285)
It was impressive to note that lecturers are provided with data and connectivity as a means to
connect and interact both at home and on the college premises and that there is an IT manager
on site who is responsible for all data and connectivity issues. In the survey, three consecutive
questions were asked regarding the importance of the internet connection for remote learning.
Figures 7.3–7.5 are summarised pie graphs of the responses received:
63
Figure 7.4: Best, fast and strong internet access responses from lecturers
From the three graphs above we deduce that more than 90% of lecturers combined agree to the
importance of having an adequate internet connection for remote learning. Lecturers added their
voices as an over-emphasis of the importance of having adequate internet access:
“We have been issued with data so we do not need LAN.” (Lecturer 41)
The lecturers have gone to the extent of expressing a passion and concern about the relevant
resources that are needed for remote learning, with one lecturer saying that the routers are
enough, they do not need wired connections. Lecturers go as far as thinking of the resources
for students as they also form an integral part of remote learning.
64
“So for NCV there's no training, I'm mean people, we assume people know
how to use data. How to connect and honestly, not all of us know technology.”
(HOD 1 L193-194)
Lastly, HOD 1 raised an important point that lecturers having the resources does not
automatically imply implementation; lecturers need to be trained to connect to the internet. With
reference to the survey, 75.3% of lecturers agreed that they needed basic training in the
computer network connection.
The technological change that is required at TVET colleges is not only dependent on lecturers’
belief in their ability and willingness to implement the envisioned change, but also on the
development of the appropriate skills that are essential to implement such change (Roney et al.,
2002). There are various measures that leaders need to put in place to try and meet the
lecturers halfway, in making the lecturers’ plight an easy one to manoeuvre. The following are
salient subthemes that were developed from the interviews.
It is essential to enable lecturers to broaden their skills and professional knowledge developed
in traditional modes of teaching and learning (Matzel & Edmund as cited in Mpu & Adu, 2019).
For lecturers to embrace the envisaged change willingly, they need to be competent and
confident enough to partake in the change. The starting point is to identify the training needs of
every lecturer – some needs might be the same, whilst some might differ. The HODs had
different approaches to identifying the training needs of the lecturers in their departments:
“… remember the training, it starts at campus level, you need to tell, or sit with
the lecturers and say, what training do you need? And then go and look at
what training you can give them to show them.” (HOD 1 L478–482)
“I think you need to train lecturers because different ways, because a lecturer
who doesn’t know computer must first be taught the basics, and then go on to
remote learning. Well, a lecturer who knows a computer well can just go on
to remote learning and show … be shown the different techniques.” (HOD 1
L327–330)
“Yes, so, for computers, you can give them the background and the theory part
… but the practical part is still a challenge.” (HOD 2 L106–108)
65
“Or I will see in general and then when they come to me I will note it down and
then I will just compile this, okay, maybe five lecturers they don’t know how to
do this, then I will ask for the training for that.” (HOD 3 L118–120)
We can deduce that the HODs mean that the campus leaders must sit with the lecturers and
determine their individual training needs, then the lecturers must receive training according
to their individual needs.
“I’m preparing that if now any lecturers that’s going to encounter any problems
with, I’m supposed to escalate to the DCM looking for the training for the
lecturers. So far we didn’t have any training.” (HOD 3 L53-55)
HOD 3 goes the extra mile to try and accommodate lecturers who request individual support
and then escalates the lecturer’s training needs and support to the Deputy Campus Manager
(DCM) of the campus.
“… we need both training for using a laptop thoroughly, they must know what
is happening with the laptop, it also train you for using under e-learning.” (HOD
3 L61–62)
HOD 3 is also of the opinion that the lecturers in the department need training on how to use a
computer/laptop and then to get training on a remote learning platform that the college will
choose to use for everyday teaching and learning.
Training and support from college leaders are essential before lecturers can be expected to
implement a new learning paradigm. From the literature we have learnt that, as much as there
are no guidelines and policies on how to give individual training to lecturers, it is up to the leaders
in their endeavours to capacitate lecturers to identify lecturers whose “skills or ability need
developing” and those that lack motivation (Dobre, 2013). The HODs, as the leaders of the
different teaching and learning departments, must go the extra mile in making sure that the
individual and subject-specific needs of the lecturers are catered for.
66
I concur with Lecturer 46 and add that, the buy-in that is required from lecturers stems from the
leaders through management support making sure to avail all the support needed for the change
to take place in the form of rigorous training and the availability of resources. The lecturers need
to have self-efficacy or the belief in the significance of the change as part of individual change
readiness. They need to believe and value the change as part of developing the change valence
(Weiner, 2009). This would lead to lecturers perceiving or judging themselves on whether they
are ready, confident and competent in implementing the change (Weiner, 2009). The lecturers’
efficacy would be high once they have the confidence to implement the change. The lecturers
should have the appropriateness (Armenakis, Harris, Holt & Hubert, 2007) or belief that the
change is needed and that they would indeed benefit from it, as well as the students and will
improve teaching and learning holistically.
The different departments had to implement strategies or plans, making sure that teaching and
learning take place in and out of the college premises even before the college had a remote
learning management system, to make sure that they keep the ball rolling. The HODs together
with the lecturers in the departments came up with plans and they are as follows:
From HOD 1 we learn that lecturers are involved in planning what the students will be given as
part of what they will learn at home on the times that they will not be at the campus. In a way,
this approach embraces distributed leadership. Badenhorst and Radile (2018) denote that
distributed leadership occurs when a leader establishes open communication channels
“vertically, horizontally and diagonally”, distributing responsibilities, keeping momentum in
capacitating, empowering, monitoring staff and making continuous and consistent follow-ups.
They encourage lecturers to use all the channels available to them and then account for all
aspects of their profession, such as student performance and classroom management and
administration. The lecturers develop strategic operational plans for their subjects that will aid
67
in strengthening the tracking of the performance and accountability based on the assigned
distributed responsibilities and “collaborate instructional management practices”.
“… you had to go to a Head Office where you had to put the lesson on the
College group and on Facebook for … for students to access. I think if I think
from the college side that was the only time when they really tried to … to
incorporate everybody at the college to reach those students, but I mean, its
per subject, it was one, it was one lesson per subject.” (HOD 2 L196–200)
“There was a management plan where you had to submit per subject. And
then we chose a lecturer. And that lecturer, had to go to S-Campus to do that
lesson.” (HOD 2 L205–207)
“Ah what we did the lecturers will prepare the notes before because they know
because last time they were platooning last year. So what they do, they will
prepare the notes for today for maybe the group A that come. Then they will
give them now tomorrow they’re not going to come to utilize those notes at
home. That that’s how we’ve done it.” (HOD 3 L194–198)
“And then the college came up and said let lecturers start making notes and
assignments and tests that we can load it on the college website.” (HOD 1
L44–45)
Lastly, all the different aforementioned plans that HODs tried to put in place were all to achieve
one goal which was continued teaching and learning, even though there is still a lack of training
and adequate resources for the lecturers and the students. A transformational leadership
approach came to play in this regard as the leaders went out of their way to motivate lecturers
to do more than the usual and go the extra mile for the sake of the students.
The practical nature of the vocational courses offered at TVET colleges doesn’t allow for all the
course content to be offered online. Naidoo and Dawuwa (2019) have suggested that the theory
part of the courses can be moved online, whilst all the practical aspects of the courses would still
be offered on a face-to-face basis. Lecturers need to have the insight when planning their subject
offering to balance what they can offer to the students face-to-face and what can easily be
tackled online. Upon interacting with the HODs regarding how to balance the subject offerings
and who decides what should be taught where, HOD 1 said:
“Well, for me from the beginning, we said that a subject like computer ODP
[Office Data Processing] is impossible to unless you make a video and they
68
have physically their own computer, . . . But a subject like maths and
accounting will, I don’t, there is some of the things that you can send students
notes with, you know, basic things to BODMAS and how does it work and
everything.” (HOD 1 L442-448)
HOD 1 perceives that computer-related subjects cannot be offered remotely altogether whilst
subjects like Maths and Accounting can have some of their basic concepts offered online.
“I think it will be the choice of the lecturer that knows the subject. Only the
lecturer will be able to determine which part to do remote and which part to do
face-to-face.” (HOD 2 L245-247)
“This, you know, you know anything about that the program managers and just
with the coordinators of the subject, they will sit down in the subject committee.
And then they will decide from the subject committee to say maybe module
one, it could go to remote learning, and then module two, then we can interact
with the student. That’s the decision that is taken from the subject committee.”
(HOD 3 L227–231)
From HOD 2 and HOD 3, it is apparent that the lecturers in their subjects and course committees
are the ones responsible for balancing which content will be best offered face-to-face or
remotely.
Lastly, it must be emphasised and understood that these measures of making sure that teaching
and learning take place whatever the case may be, were all contingency measures. Lecturers
need formal pedagogical training. The training will make them competent enough to know which
content must be dealt with in the classroom and which content can be dealt with online to ensure
that the students are not compromised in the process and that the level of instruction they receive
is of a good standard.
The training offered for lecturers preparing for remote learning cannot be offered in isolation; it
needs to meet certain standards. TVET colleges are seen as global players as they are the
main producers of the labour force of the country. The remote learning platform, as well as the
training offered to the lecturers for teaching and learning, should therefore be of a global
educational standard. It is imperative that when leaders select a learning site and train the
lecturers, they make sure that the service provider has the best to offer the college. The HODs
said the following regarding making sure that lecturers received training of a global standard:
“See the problem is you have to start [at] the beginning, and build it up. So
you can’t just throw people at the deep end, and say listen, load all your stuff
69
on the platform and this is what to do. And you need to mark the students
here and there. Everybody is not on that level, so, what you need to do is start
with the basics, and go with it, if there is a lecturer like Mr E, who are more
advanced, because remember he did some courses at Wits and all this, those
lecturers are ready . . . So what I think we need to do, is engage Universities
to see how their remote learning was successful.” (HOD 1 L472–487)
“You must investigate, you must check make sure your research is very
important to make sure your research don’t … don’t just take in your remote
learning enquire from the TVET. I mean from the universities because in the
universities, they are using e-learning is so good, you must make sure that
whatever that they’re going to have is going to empower lecturers.” (HOD 3
L243–247)
HOD 1 and HOD 3 perceive that universities are suitable institutions to assist TVET colleges to
receive training that is of a global standard because universities already offer online courses and
have up-and-running learning management systems.
“I think you can look at the content that they’re going to present. How do you
evaluate if its going to be on par? I think it depends on the content. There
must be like a syllabus or a structure that you can evaluate before the time to
determine if it’s going to be on standard or not.” (HOD 2 L269–272)
HOD 2 said that the training provider must have a curriculum that must be evaluated first to see
if it meets the required standards before training. The training to be offered to lecturers at TVET
colleges is important as it sets the standard of the remote learning that will be offered to students
and also sets the knowledge and skills that will be given to the lecturers. Leaders at TVET
colleges have their tasks cut out for them on this one as this can either make or break the college.
Section 22(2)(a) of the Skills Development Act posits that the functions of the Skills Development
unit in an organ of state such as public TVET colleges are to “research and analyse the labour
market to determine the skills development needs” (Skills Development Act, 1998). When the
need has been established it needs to align the training or service providers contemplated in
section 17(1)(c) that are accredited and recognised in terms of the South African Qualifications
Authority Act or other regulatory bodies of training providers. In so doing, it will be easy for TVET
colleges to choose and conduct research about a training provider by checking their curriculum
and performance in general, to see if they can meet the needs of the college as well as the global
learning standards.
Lastly, when HOD 3 was asked if she had an example of a university that has a remote learning
platform that is of a good global standard, she responded by saying:
70
“Uh, I do have that is the Pearson University … Pearson University. You know,
their standard is very good. They are … they are giving the students the
learning, ah, e-learning also they are writing their tests there you know the
standard is good to sort of ask them if it was my making.” (HOD 3 L252-255)
Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, universities had pre-existing experience with teaching and
learning technologies and were able to move to online learning quickly by expanding their
existing technologies (Ali, 2020). This enabled them to respond more positively to the
changing circumstances than the TVET colleges. This puts them in a much better position
to advise and assist TVET colleges about migrating to remote learning.
Leadership at TVET colleges is multifaceted and requires innovative leaders that can identify
needs and then define goals and outcomes to meet those needs, both at the individual and
institutional level (Robertson & Frick, 2018). There is also a need for leaders to keep abreast
with improving teaching and learning techniques as they are influenced by the ever-evolving
market trends, industrial revolutions and meeting global educational standards. Recently, there
has been an over-arching need that a new, resilient and flexible teaching and learning
mechanism to be embraced. In so doing, it requires an “all-hands-on-deck” approach, as the
decision-making and implementation of a new teaching and learning mechanism requires a
collective. A distributed leadership approach was suggested as an appropriate leadership style
that could help with the change. Leaders need to work harmoniously with lecturers and other
stakeholders at different organisational levels. The HODs have suggested various ways that
TVET colleges can adopt in marshalling this monumental change.
“Well, you know what happened previous years at the college, when we had
this Cap budget, when they gave us money to restructure the college. It was
run by a committee. It was, there was someone at the head of the committee
and he had people working with him. And that is what we have to get, is a
committee to say, it’s an ad-hoc committee, let’s get all the experts for e-
learning, lecturers, external people and so what do we need and engage
universities and all the people that have successfully done that, and say what
have you done? Let’s get together and make the change.” (HOD 1 L552–559)
“I think the committee must start from the campuses, per campus. Let us have
the committee for the campus. Because now I cannot take somebody from A
Campus and pass and make a committee for B Campus. Let us have a
committee from B Campus. After B Campus, all these committees initially,
71
every campus form one committee for the Head Office serve now you will know
I will come up with something that is happening in B Campus, they will come
up with something that is happening in A Campus, maybe we are going to
have something that is common. Then it’s going to be much easier for them
so that we can see because now, we are saying we’re running short on this.
At C Campus they are not running out of the same thing. They are covered.”
(HOD 3 L322–330)
The HODs suggested the formation of working committees at campus and college levels. The
formation of committees comprising various stakeholders is a form of distributed leadership, as
the leaders would depend on others for collective decision-making. This synergy, collaboration
and participation would include people that have already implemented the change such as
university personnel, as well as HODs who are the leaders close to the lecturers. They know
and understand the needs of the lecturers more than anyone else. The roles needed to be
played to ensure that remote learning is realised are complex, uncertain and are in a rapidly
changing environment and require coordination and collective intelligence in decision-making
and problem-solving (Gronn, 2008). College leaders cannot bear all the burdens, pressures
and demands associated with providing support to lecturers embarking on remote learning,
therefore having working committees will have to suffice. When people come together
holistically to “work, plan, learn and act” (Dinhan, Aubusson & Brady, 2009) they generate
further leadership capacity within the individual or the college.
“I will I will get people in to show them how to do proper these things. On
different subjects.” (HOD 2 L328–329)
HOD 2 perceives that having external service providers to be in charge of the learning
management system will help capacitate TVET colleges for remote and e-learning. The opinion
may mean that another education institution like Pearson University is in charge of the LMS at a
TVET college. This perception is very broad, and in my opinion, it will need a feasibility study to
be carried out to determine if it can hold any water.
Lastly, HOD 2 mentioned a very important fact that can be considered for the future:
7.4 Summary
This chapter focused on the findings and interpretation of the collected data for the study from
the qualitative survey and the qualitative interviews. Various themes and sub-themes emerged
with the following main themes developed from both the surveys as well as the interview data
that were analysed and interpreted infused with literature:
The following chapter will deal with the summary, recommendations and will consolidate
the study by focusing on the main findings in relation to the research questions.
The revolution of ICT that is witnessed today poses a major challenge for most lecturers’
professional development (Hakkarainen et al., 2001). Lecturers are required to learn and utilise
technical skills adequate to use ICT productively for teaching and learning. Furthermore,
lecturers are required to acquire pedagogical expertise to fruitfully utilise technology-based
teaching and learning environment. These lecturer skills must in the end be able to “facilitate
73
higher-level knowledge acquisition skills” (Hakkarainen et al., 2001) for students to adapt
constructively to the knowledge society. Currently, lecturers lack the vital technical expertise
in ICT which has significant constraints to the possibility of developing new and innovative
computer-supported pedagogical practices at TVET Colleges. Thus, this study sought to
investigate the training and resource needs of TVET College lecturers for remote learning, and
then explore the views of TVET College leaders about the implications for leadership to support
the needs of the lecturers for remote learning.
This final chapter reflects on the important aspects of the study. The chapter provides an
overall summary of the findings of the study, conclusions related to the research questions and
recommendations and limitations of the study as well as the recommendations for further
possibilities as suggested from this study.
This study aimed to explore the training and resource needs of TVET college lecturers for remote
learning as well as possible implications and guidelines for TVET college leaders in their
endeavours to develop, capacitate and empower lecturers to be competent for both face-to-face
and remote learning. The study was located within an interpretivist worldview and was a generic
qualitative research study. Qualitative surveys in a form of an online questionnaire were
conducted with 73 TVET college lecturers in Ekurhuleni and semi-structured one-on-one
interviews were conducted with three HODs of three different departments of one TVET college
campus in Ekurhuleni, Gauteng.
Chapter 1 of the study provided the background of the research problem and the motivation for
the study. Chapter 2 outlined the research question, while Chapter 3 dealt with the aims and
objectives of the study. Chapter 4 clarified important concepts used in the study and Chapter 5
dealt with important literature concerning the history and background of TVET colleges, lecturer
training and resource needs for remote learning, leadership approaches to ensure the smooth
transition towards remote learning, challenges/limitations for TVET colleges to implement remote
learning and possible strategies for training towards remote learning in TVET colleges.
Chapter 6 focused on the research methodology, while Chapter 7 dealt with the findings and
interpretation of the data that was collected through the qualitative survey questionnaire and the
semi-structured interviews. Salient themes and subthemes were also presented in Chapter 7.
74
The main findings of the study were:
It was quite clear that TVET college lecturers involved in the current study have differing abilities,
experiences and needs with regards to training in specific readily available applications, in the
adequate use of online teaching approaches, aligning of curricula to digital content, online
assessment and online communication.
Lecturers also indicated that resources such as computers, interactive whiteboards, data and
video projectors, and supporting resources such as scanners, lightpens and sound equipment
are all essential elements of successful remote learning.
Lecturers were adamant that adequate bandwidth, particularly off-site was needed to move
towards remote learning. They also indicated that the current provision for broadband internet
access at the TVET college was unsatisfactory.
Lecturers were also clear on the need to have safe backup and storage facilities at their disposal
as well as infrastructure such as adequate and strategically placed electrical access points and
digital library services at the disposal of lecturers and students.
HOD perspectives
The HODs indicated that computer training was offered to lecturers but that the training offered
did not necessarily meet the needs of the lecturers in terms of preparing them for remote teaching
and learning. It also appeared that the training offered lacked coordination.
HODs indicated that lecturers were very committed and eager to learn new ways of teaching and
learning to meet the needs of the ever-changing landscape of teaching and learning in the 21st
century. HODs were also of the opinion that training needs for different subjects varied and that
training had to be tailored for such diverse needs.
HODs made mention of the leadership implications that the move towards remote learning has
for lecturers who are not necessarily native to computer technology. Leaders needed to take a
much more personal interest in the lecturers’ long-term development, by creating flexible
scaffolding opportunities for lecturers who had little or no experience with teaching via digital
interaction. Continuous support was considered a crucial leadership task for leaders at TVET
colleges. The important role of primary leaders to support the HODs was also an important
implication mentioned.
75
8.3 Recommendations
Recommendation 1: Training needs of TVET lecturers
It is recommended that TVET college leaders provide the required training for the lectures. As
identified in the findings (section 7.2.2 and 7.3.1), the training of lecturers will vary, depending on
the computer skills and knowledge of the lecturers and on the nature and needs of the subject
that they are offering. The training provided to the lecturers is recommended to be in the flow
provided below:
Computer training
Lecturers are provided with training in: computer applications necessary for their
subjects; network connection training and other basic computer training.
The training may not follow this exact flow as other lecturers who already have moderate and
expert computer knowledge and skills can start by receiving remote learning training.
76
Recommendation 2: Resource needs of lecturers
It is recommended as identified in the findings (section 7.2.3 and 7.3.2) that lecturers be furnished
with all the hardware and software resources that they will need for remote learning before
implementation is expected. In this regard, the three types of resources needed by lecturers are
hardware, software and connectivity. Below we take a look at the recommended resources,
based on the survey responses and the interview interactions.
Hardware
Laptop computers or Ultrabooks with high-quality features and capabilities
Video cameras
Speakers and microphones
Lightpens and scanners
Printers
Interactive whiteboards
Data/Multimedia projectors
Additional external storage devices (External hard drives, flash drives or cloud storage)
Software
Microsoft Office package
E-learning (Learning Management System) software
o Interactive software
o Simulation software
o Assessment software
Communication and feedback software
Links to educational websites, digital libraries and e-journals
In terms of software, the college might need just one learning management system that will have
enabled capabilities for all the other mentioned applications, or it might need two, such as a
college website linking the LMS. Of the software to be used, lecturers and HODs recommended
specific software or sites, the ones most recommended are:
MS Teams
Zoom
YouTube
Skype
CAD Software
BrightSpace
77
Connectivity
Leadership approach
It is recommended as identified in the findings (section 7.3.3) that TVET colleges embrace a
distributive leadership approach to assist with meeting the resource and training needs of
lecturers towards remote learning as well as to transform successfully from 100% face-to-face
learning to remote learning. Distributive leadership means that decision-making powers will not
be a task of a few individual leaders. Leaders relinquish their decision-making powers to a
collective. Committees need to be set up at the campus and college levels. At the campus level,
the committee comprises the DCM, HODs and the program managers. At the college level, the
committee comprises the DCMs from campuses, centralised college leaders and external bodies
such as e-learning university personnel as well as researchers who can assist colleges to appoint
appropriate service providers holistically.
It is recommended that TVET colleges provide adequate and rigorous training for lecturers for
remote learning to create self-efficacy, change valence (Weiner, 2009) and the appropriateness
(Armenakis et al., 2007) that is required for the transformation to take place successfully. It is
therefore recommended that TVET colleges utilise the following training guidelines.
The preconceived notion of what the resource and training needs of TVET colleges are;
Training procedures that need to be followed to capacitate lecturers with pedagogical and
other expert skills and knowledge to take part in remote learning.
The findings of the study were limited to responses of one TVET college in Ekurhuleni,
Gauteng. The projected sample size of the lecturers for the qualitative survey was 90, with
only 73 lecturers responding.
The survey was supposed to be conducted face-to-face with the lecturers to facilitate two-
way interactions and discussions and to answer any questions requiring clarification.
However, because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the survey was conducted online. Lecturers
did not get the opportunity to ask questions and some lecturers did not provide additional
views/opinions that they could have articulated in a face-to-face interaction.
Owing to the limited time available to complete the study, the interviews were limited to
three HODs: the HOD-NATED Engineering Studies; HOD-NATED Business Studies and
HOD-NCV Business Studies. The study could have been extended to include HOD-NCV
Engineering Studies and ICT; NATED-Hospitality studies as well as the HOD-Skills
Development Centres to get the in-depth perceptions of the HODs from all the different
departments at TVET colleges.
79
It is recommended that for future research the investigator extend the sample size to include
all lecturers in a college to accommodate all the different learning departments as well as the
HODs in these departments.
The study explored the training and resource needs of TVET college lecturers and then
developed training guidelines for remote learning. Monumental transformation is needed at TVET
colleges involving acquiring infrastructure and personnel for e-learning as well as providing
students with learning resources.
2. The students at TVET colleges in South Africa mostly come from disadvantaged backgrounds
with low socio-economic status. They face a collage of challenges and mostly depend on the
state through NSFAS (National Student Financial Aid Scheme) for their education provision.
The very nature of their background and socio-economic status means that they will have the
obvious challenge of having limited to no access to devices and will experience connectivity
issues (Naidoo & Dawuwa, 2019). TVET colleges migrating to remote learning without having
support for the students will result in academic exclusion which is an infringement of the
student’s constitutional right to “further education, which the State, through reasonable
80
measure, must make progressively available and accessible” (Constitution of the Republic of
South Africa, 1996 section 29(1)(b)). An empirical study should be conducted to investigate
the learning devices and connectivity solutions that TVET students need for remote learning.
8.6 Conclusion
TVET colleges are the primary skills drivers and the forefront producers of the workforce of the
country. The deadly COVID-19 pandemic and rapid technological revolution have led higher
education institutions to move away from face-to-face learning to embrace a more resilient and
flexible teaching and learning system to curtail the spread of the coronavirus and to move with
the changing times. A resilient and flexible teaching and learning paradigm that will also be
compliant to the new living conditions imposed in an effort to contain the rapidly spreading
global coronavirus requires the integration of ICT in teaching and learning so that students can
have access and learn remotely from the institution. Lecturers are the key stakeholders in
implementing ICT-integrated learning successfully (Ali, 2020). Reciprocally, lecturers need to
be supported accordingly by their leaders. The training and resource needs of lecturers cannot
be overstated in this regard, because lecturers need to be experts in their subject matter,
educational pedagogy, computer science, other behavioural theories and have varying
communication skills to fit into the new learning environment. The study aimed to investigate
the training needs of the lecturers towards remote learning from the perspective of the lecturers
and their HODs as the first line leaders of the lecturers, and then propose training guidelines
and support for the lecturers towards remote learning to the college leaders.
This exploratory qualitative investigation found that it is mandatory that lecturers receive
resources and training prior to the remote learning transformation implementation. It also found
that owing to the differing nature of the vocational subjects taught at TVETs and the varying
computer skills and knowledge of lecturers their training needs will differ. The ICT resources
that they need also differs depending on whether a subject is theoretical or practical. TVET
college leaders are responsible for making sure that lecturers are supported and receive the
training and resources they need for remote learning to take place, but because of the
magnitude and requirements of remote learning, the leaders cannot keep up. A distributive
leadership approach was proposed whereby the college leaders will rely on campus and
college committees to know and cater for the individual training and resource needs of
lecturers.
81
Furthermore, training guidelines were also proposed to the college leaders that will ensure that
lecturers receive training that is appropriate, accredited and meets global educational
standards. It is hoped that the study has a contribution to make in helping policy-makers and
decision-makers at college, provincial and national levels in advancing TVET colleges from
being 100% face-to-face learning institutions to embrace the 21st-century learning paradigm
that will help bridge the technological divide gap between TVET colleges and universities and
to help TVET colleges to keep pace with industries and the ever-evolving market trends, as
TVET colleges feed industries and business with their workforce. It is also hoped that the study
has helped TVET colleges’ professional development in empowering and capacitating lecturers
to be 21st-century transformative intellectuals and the country as a whole to sustain its
development agenda.
82
LIST OF REFERENCES
Adendorff, M. B., & Van Wyk, C. (2016). Offering TVET college lecturers increased access to
professional qualification programmes through a national open learning system in South
Africa. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/11599/2572
Ali, W. (2020). Online and remote learning in higher education institutions: A necessity in light of
the COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Education Studies, 10(3), 16–25.
doi:10.5539/hes.v.10n3p16
Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., Holt, D. T., & Hubert, S. F. (2007). Readiness for organizational
change: The systematic development of a scale. The Journal of Applied Behavioural
Science, 43(2): 232–255. doi: 10.1177/0021886306295295
Badenhorst, J. W., & Radile, R. S. (2018). Poor performance at TVET colleges: Conceptualising a
distributed instructional leadership approach as a solution. African Education Review, 15(3),
91–112. doi:10.1080/18146627.2017.1352452
Badshah, S. (2012). Historical study of leadership theories. Journal of Strategic Human Resources
Management, 1(1), 49–59. Available from:
https://proquest.com/openview/051aa5b264ad2da9855e3477b7fe73a8/1
Bakare, J., Oviawe, J. I., Ariyo, S. O., Nwachukwu, C., Anoure, N. C., Anayo, M. M., Nwadi, C. L.,
Ibidapo, A. B., Victor, O. A., & Maghalu, F. A. (2020). Building e-teaching capacity of TVET
lecturers to cushion the effects of COVID-19 and other future pandemics on tertiary
education system of low and middle income countries. International Journal of Advanced
Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), 11(11), 187–207.
doi:10.34218/IJARET.11.11.2020.017
Barkhuizen, N., & Rothman, S. (2008). Occupational stress of academic staff in South African
higher education institutions. South African Journal of Psychology, 28(2), 321–336. doi:
https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/EJC98489
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: The Free
Press.
Bigum, C. (2000). Technology and the teacher. Australian Educator, 27, 14.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in
Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.119/1478088706qp063oa
83
Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2016). School leadership in West Africa: Findings from a systematic
literature review. African Education Review, 13(3-4), 80–103.
doi:10.1080/18146627.2016.1229572
Caelli, K., Ray, L., & Mill, J. (2003). Clear as mud: Towards greater clarity in generic research.
International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(2), 1–13. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1177%2F160940690300200201
Callan, V., Mitchell, J., Clayton, B., & Smith, L. (2007). Approaches for sustaining and building
management and leadership capability in VET providers: Literature review on leadership and
suggested reading list support documents. National Center for Vocational Education
Research (NCVER). Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED499671
Clear, T., Haataja, A., Meyer, J., Suhonen, J., & Varden, S. A. (2001). Dimensions of distance
learning for computer education. ACM SIGCSE Bulleting, 33(2), 101–110. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1145/571922.571964
Continuing Education and Training Act, Act 16 of 2006. (2006, December 11).
Coughlin, E. C., & Lemke, C. (1999). Professional competency continuum: Professional skills for
the Digital Age classroom. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ599771
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Steps in conducting a scholarly mixed methods study. Available from:
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dberspeakers/48
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed
methods approaches. (5th ed). London, England: Sage.
Department of Higher Education and Training. (2008). Formal technical college instructional
programmes in the RSA, Report 191 (2001/08). Pretoria, South Africa: Author.
Department of Higher Education and Training. (2014). DHET function shift circular no 1/2014.
(2014, March 18). Pretoria, South Africa: Author.
Department of Higher Education and Training. (2015). Department of Higher Education and
Training National Certificate (Vocational) qualification NQF level 2, 3 & 4 matrix of subjects –
2015. Pretoria, South Africa: Author.
84
Díaz, L. B., & Entonado, B. (2009). Are the functions of teachers in e-learning and face-to-face
learning environments really different? Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 331–343.
Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/jedutechsoci.12.4.3.31
Dimond, J., Fiesler, C., DiSalvo, B., Pelc, J., & Bruchman, A. (2012). Qualitative data collection
technologies: A comparison of instant messaging, e-mail, and phone. In Proceedings of the
17th ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 227–280). doi:
https://doi.org/10.1145/2389176.2389218
Dinhan, S., Aubusson, P., & Brady, L. (2009). Distributed leadership as a factor and outcome of
teacher action learning. International Electronic journal of Leadership in Learning. Available
from: https://opus.cloud.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/9901
Dobre, D. (2013). Employee motivation and organizational performance. Review of Applied Socio-
Economic Research, 5(1), 53–60. Available from: http://www.reaser.eu
Dziuban, C. D., Hartman, J. L., & Moskal, P. D. (2004). Blended learning. Educause Center for
Applied Research Bulletin, 2004(7).
Eddy, P. (2010). Community college leadership: A multi-dimensional model for leading change.
Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Field, S., Musset, P., & Galverez-Alvan, J. (2014). Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) reviews of Vocational Education and Training: A skill beyond school
review of South Africa. Paris, France: OECD.
Flynn, M. (2018). 3 keys to successful learning in the remote workplace. Available from:
https://trainingindustry.com/atricles/remote_learning/3keys-to-successful-learning-in-the-
emote-workplace/
Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating
qualitative research. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(6), 717–732. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x
Geel, P. A. (2005). The management of staff development programmes at Further Education and
Training (FET) Colleges in the Gauteng province. Pretoria, South Africa: University of South
Africa.
85
Gewer, A. (2010). Choices and chances: FET Colleges and transition from school and work.
Johannesburg, South Africa: National Business Initiative.
Gewer, A. (2016). Unfinished business: Managing the transformation of Further Education and
Training colleges. In A. Kraak, A. Paterson & K. Boka (eds.), Change management in TVET
Colleges: Lesson learnt from the field of practice, (pp. 23–46). Cape Town, South Africa:
African Minds.
Greenbank, P. (2003). The role of values in educational research: The case for reflexivity. British
Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 791–801 . doi:
https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192032000137303
Grollman, P., & Rauner, F. (2007). International perspectives on the teachers and lecturers in
Technical and Vocational Education. Dordrecht, South African: Springer.
Hakkarainen, K., Muukonen, H., Lipponen, L., Ilomäki, L., Rahikainen, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2001).
Teachers’ information and communication technology (ICT) skills and practices of using
ICT. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(2), 181–197. Available from:
https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/8427/
Hallinger, P., & Lee., M. (2013). Exploring principal capacity to lead reform of teaching and
learning quality in Thailand. International Journal of Education Development, 33(2013), 305–
315. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.03.002
Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., & Ruthven, K. (2006). Situated expertise in integrating of multimedia
simulation into secondary science teaching. International Journal of Science Education,
28(7), 701–732. doi: https://doi.org/10.1020/09500690500404656
Huang, H. M., & Liaw, J. S. (2005). Exploring user’s attitudes and intentions towards the web as a
survey tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(5), 729–743. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.020
Huang, R. H., Liu, D. J., Tlili, A., Yang, J. F., & Wang, H. (2020). Handbook on facilitating flexible
learning during educational disruption: The Chinese experience in maintaining undisrupted
learning in COVID-19 outbreak. Beijing, China: Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal
University.
86
Kahlke, R. M. (2014). Generic qualitative approaches: Pitfalls and benefits of
methodologicalmixology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13(1), 37–52. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1177%2F160940691401300119
Kanwar, A., Balasubramanian, K., & Carr, A. (2019). Changing the TVET paradigm: New models
for lifelong learning. International Journal of Training Research, 17(1), 54–68.
doi:10.1080/14480220.2019.1629722
Kiran, R., Agarwal, P. D., & Verma, A. K. (2013). Knowledge management: Role of thought
leadership and junior academia in enhancing research and curriculum in institutions of higher
technical education. Sage Open, 3(2), 1–13. doi:10.1177/2158244013484915
Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and applying paradigms in educational context.
International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26–41. doi:10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26
Kohler, S. (2003, May). Asmal: Launch of FET colleges (15/05/2003). Available from:
https://m.polity.org.za/article/asmail-launch-of-fet-colleges-15052003-2003-05-15
Kooij, D. T. A. M., Jansen, P. G. W., Dikkers J. S. E., & De Lange, A. H. (2010). The influence of
age on the associations between HR practices and both affective commitment and job
satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 31(8), 1111–1136.
Available from: doi:10.1002/job.666
Lincoln, U. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Mackenzie, N., & Knipe, S. (2006). Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and methodology.
Issues of educational research, 16(2), 193–205. Available from:
https://www.iier.org.au/iier16/mackenzie.html
Majumdar, S. (2020). Technical Vocational Education & Training – reflections on the issues facing
TVET and its potential in the time of COVID-19. Retrieved from:
https://www.linkedIn.com/in/shyamalmajumdar
Marope, P. T. M., Chakroun, B., & Holmes, K. P. (2015). Unleashing the potential: Transforming
Technical and Vocational Education and Training. Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing.
Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (Vol. 4.1). Newbury
Park, CA: Sage.
87
McCain, N. (2020, April 18). Unisa to continue mid-year exams, but no physical venues will be
used. News 24. Available from: https://www-news24-
com.cdn.ampproject.org/vls/www.news24.com/amp/news24/southafrica/news/unisa-to-
continue-with-mid-year-exams-but-no-physical-venue-will-be-used-20200418?Amp
McLead, S. (2018). Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Simply Psychology, 1, 1–8. Available from:
https://canadacollege.edu/dreamers/docs/Maslows-Hiearachy-of-Hierarchy-of-Needs.pdf
McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2014). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry. (7th ed.).
Harlow, England: Pearson Education.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation
account. Toronto, Canada: Wiley.
Mhlanga, D., & Moloi, T. (2020). COVID-19 and the digital transformation of education: What are
we learning on 4IR in South Africa? Education Sciences Journal, 10(7), 180–191.
doi:10.339/edusci10070180
Mmako, M., & Schultz, C. (2016). An employee engagement framework for Technical Vocational
and Training Colleges in South Africa. South African Journal of Higher Education, 30(2),
143–163. doi:10.20853/30-2-606
Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., & Hartman, J. (2013). Blended learning: A dangerous idea? Internet and
Higher Education, 18, 15–23. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ieduc.2012.12.001
Mouton, J. (2013). How to Succeed in Your Master's and Doctoral Studies: A South African Guide
and Resource Book. Pretoria, South Africa: Van Schaik.
Mpu, U., & Adu, E. O. (2019). Reframing TVET colleges into 21st century learning organisations.
American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR), 3(7), 96–102.
Retrieved from: https://www.ajhssr.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/O193796102.pdf
Naidoo, R., & Dawuwa, T. (2019). Technology integration in TVET colleges in a semi-urban area.
Proceedings of EDULEARN 19 Conference (1st – 3rd July, 2019).
doi:10.21125/edulearn.2019.2707
Nundkumar, A., & Subban, M. (2018). Embracing the fourth industrial revolution: Risk-based
perspectives of the South African TVET college sector. Journal of Contemporary
Management. 15(special edition), 305–328. doi: https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/EJC-
16a3e15d2f
88
Oltmann, S. (2016, May). Qualitative interviews: A methodological discussion of the interviewer
and respondent contexts. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social
Research (Vol. 17, No. 2). doi: https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.2.2551
Pappas, C. (2015). The top open source learning management systems. Available from:
https://elearningindustry.com/top-open-source-learning-management-systems
Phutsisi, M. (2006). Designing of a capacity development system for educational staff at Further
Education and Training (FET) colleges in the Free State. Pretoria, South Africa: University of
South Africa.
Pretorius, F., & Lemmer, E. (2004). Teaching in South Africa: The teacher as a leader,
administrator and manager. Pinetown, South Africa: Macmillan.
Robertson, C., & Frick, L. (2018). Conflicting priorities: the dichotomous roles of leadership and
management at TVET colleges. Journal of Vocational, Adult and Continuing Education and
Training, 1(1), 71-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.14426/jovacet.v1i1.304
Roney, C., Donnelly, M. B., Dove, T., Tiffany-Morales, J., Adelman, N., & Zucker, A. (2002).
Technology-related professional development in the context of educational reform: A
literature review. Available from:
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Andrew_Zucker/publication/253202611_Technology-
related_professional_development_in_the_context_of_educational_reform_A_literature_revie
w/links/55cb460808aebc967dfd4b36.pdf
Rost, J. (1991). Leadership for the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Praeger.
89
Russell, G., Finger, G., & Russel, N. (2000). Information technology skills of Australian teachers:
Implications for the teacher education. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher
Education, 9(2), 149–166. doi:10.108/147590000200087
Saadé, R. G., He, X., & Kira, D. (2007). Exploring dimensions to online learning. Computers in
Human Behaviour, 23(4), 1721–1739. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.10.002
Sadegül Akbaba, A., Kalayci, E., & Avci, Ü. (2011). Integrating ICT at the faculty level: A case
study. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 230–240.
Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ946631
Sah, P. K. (2010). Assistive technology competencies: Need, outlook, and prospects with
reference to special educators for children with visual impairment. American Journal of
Disability, 200(15), 22–35. Available from: doi: 10.5463/DCID.v29i1.611
Schultze, U., & Avital, M. (2011). Designing interviews to generate rich data for information
systems research. Information and Organization, 21(1), 1–16.
doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2010.11.001
Senge, P. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of learning organizations. London,
England: Random House.
Shrewsbury, C. M. (1987). What is feminist pedagogy? Women’s Studies Quarterly, 15(3/4), 6–14.
Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40003432
Silvester, J., Anderson, N., Haddleton, E., Cunningham-Snell, N., & Gibb, A. (2000). A cross-
modal comparison of telephone and face-to-face selection interviews in graduate recruitment.
International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(1), 16–21. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00127
90
Stiles, W. B. (1999). Evaluating qualitative research. Evidence Based Mental Health, 2(4), 99–101.
doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ebmh.2.4.99
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications.
Tente, A., & Moustaka, D. (2019). Adult educator’s opinions on the new technologies in distance
education impact of the gender and age. International Journal of Development Research, 9(7),
29086–29092. Available from: doi: https://doi.org/10.37118
The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act 108 of 1996. (1996, December, 10).
Thomas, O. O., & Israel, O. O. (2013). Effectiveness of animation and multimedia teaching on
students’ performance in science subjects. British Journal of Education, Science &
Behavioural Science, 4(2), 201–210. doi: https://doi.org/10.0734/BJESBS/2014/3340
UNESCO. (2020). COVID-19 response – hybrid learning: Hybrid learning as a key in ensuring
continued learning. Available from: https://en.unesco.org/default/files/unesco-covid-19-
response-toolkit-hybrid-learning-pdf&ved=
Vrasidas, C. (2015). The rhetoric of reform and teachers’ use of ICT. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 46(2), 370–380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/byet.12149
Webb, L., Walker, K. L., & Allen, M. W. (2002). Feminist pedagogy: Identifying basic principles.
Academic Exchange Quarterly, 6(1), 67–72. Available from:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223274654
Wedekind, V. (2016). Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) reform in South
Africa: Implications for college lecturers, context and background. SAQA Bulletin, 15(1), 1–
30. Pretoria, South Africa: South African Qualifications Authority.
Wedekind, V., & Bolton, H. (2016). SAQA Bulletin, 15(1), iii–vii. Pretoria, South Africa: South
African Qualifications Authority.
Wilson, S. & MacLean, R. (2011). Research methods and data analysis for psychology. London,
England: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
World Bank. (2020). Remote learning and COVID-19: The use of technologies at scale across an
education system as a result of massive school closing in response to the COVID-19
pandemic to enable distance education and online learning. Available from:
https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/edutech/brief/edtech-covid-19
91
Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. London, England: Guilford.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5 th ed.). Canadian Journal of
Program Evaluation 30(1), 108–110. doi:10.3138/cjpe.30.1.108
Yuen, A., & Ma, W. (2002). Gender differences in teacher computer acceptance. Journal of
Technology and Teacher Education, 10(3), 365–382. Available from:
https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/15142/
Yunus, M. M. (2007). Malaysian ESL teachers’ use of ICT in their classroom: Expectations and
realities. ReCALL: The Journal of EUROCALL, 19(1), 79–95. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344007000614
92
APPENDICES
93
APPENDIX 1: Ethics clearance
NHREC Registration Number REC-110613-036
ETHICS CLEARANCE
• If there are major revisions to the research proposal based on recommendations from the
Faculty Higher Degrees Committee, a new application for ethical clearance must be
submitted.
• If the research question changes significantly so as to alter the nature of the study, it
remains the duty of the student/researcher to submit a new application.
• It remains the student’s/researcher’s responsibility to ensure that all ethical forms and
documents related to the research are kept in a safe and secure facility and are available
on demand.
• Please quote the reference number above in all future communications and documents.
Sincerely,
94
Chair: FACULTY OF EDUCATION RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEE
14 April 2021
It is a High benefit and Low risk project. It is approved and has possible solutions for the COVID-
19 restrictions as the student can use online tools. Just convert the questionnaire to an online
format to avoid all the issues in page 6 including the interviews (e.g. Zoom) please.
The application is a high benefit - low risk study and should be approved. The researcher may
reconsider the method of conducting the survey. This may easily be done remotely in light of the
current Covid-19 climate.
95
APPENDIX 2: Permission letter
23 Silica Avenue
Dersley Park
Springs
1559
1. This letter serves to confirm that Ms. Nonhlanhla Venice Nyembe, Identity Number:
8908230326080, persal/employee number: 26977621 is hereby granted permission to conduct
her research at Benoni Campus in order for her to complete her studies. It is advised that during
this period, COVID-19 regulations must be adhered to at all times during the course of conducting
the abovementioned research.
2. If you have any questions regarding permission that is granted to Ms. NV Nyembe, please do
not hesitate to contact the HR Office, Mr. Nkateko Zitha at Nkatekoz@eec.edu.za 011 730 6600
/ 071 859 9449.
____________ ______________
Ms. HM Sibande Date
Principal: Ekurhuleni East TVET College
HMS/nsz
96
APPENDIX 3: Survey questionnaire
Dear Participants
I, Nonhlanhla Venice Nyembe, hereby request you to participate in a research study that aims to explore
the training and resource needs of TVET college lecturers for remote learning. This information will
assist TVET college leaders understanding the training and resources needs for lecturers, then enhance
their skills development strategies and also contribute to future planning and implementation as TVET
colleges endeavour to migrate from being 100% contact learning institutions.
This study forms part of my minor dissertation for Master Education in Educational Management at the
University of Johannesburg and is supervised by Doctor M. Van Der Merwe.
Please pay careful consideration to the following questions, answer them sincerely and then comment
on your personal needs. The feedback you give must be in a constructive way that can be used to better
the future of TVET college lecturers. You are welcome to express your views and give as many details
as possible.
Thank you once again for agreeing to participate in this exercise. The questionnaire should take about
30 minutes to complete. Your participation in this study is voluntary and be assured that any information
you supply will be treated with the utmost confidentiality, and you will not be identifiable in any way.
Investigator: NV NYEMBE
Date: ____________________________________
97
SECTION A: DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Please include any other information about yourself you deem important for me to know in the space provided:
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
98
SECTION B: TRAINING NEEDS
Please answer the following questions by indicating your level of agreement with the statement made. Be as
honest as you can in terms of your own needs in this respect.
NOT APPLICABLE
COMPLETELY
SOMEWHAT
DISAGREE
AGREE
AGREE
AGREE
9. I need basic computer training in MS Word.
10 I need basic computer training in MS Excel.
11 I need basic computer training in MS PowerPoint.
12 I need basic training in computer network connection.
13 I need training on teaching approaches to present my subject online.
14 I need training on how to align digital educational content to existing curricula.
15 I need training in video conferencing to present lessons online.
I need training to create graphics for online learning to liven up lessons and
16
create demonstrations.
I need training to create audio for online learning to liven up lessons and
17
create demonstrations.
I need training to create animations for online learning to liven up lessons
18
and create demonstrations.
19 I need training on creating online tutorials so students can learn remotely.
20 I need training on creating interactive e-teaching contents.
21 I need training on how to collaborate with my students online.
22 I need training on how to manage learning activities online.
I need training on how to evaluate e-teaching activities using compatible
23
tools and techniques.
24 I need training on how to coordinate and monitor assessments online.
25 I need training to assess, grade and enter student marks online/remotely.
26 I need training on how to set periods and limits for online learning.
I need training and support on setting official two-way communication
27
channels with students: e-mails or e-learning platform communication tool.
I need training with the e-learning communication tool to provide feedback
28
on assessments.
29 My subject will require simulation software that I will need training for.
30 My subject will require e-assessments software that I will need training for.
31 I need training in time management for blended learning (Half face-to-face,
half remote learning).
32 I need training on how to set time instructions for students for all online
learning activities and e-assessments.
33 I need additional training on how to use interactive whiteboards.
34 I need additional training on how to use data projectors.
35 I need additional training on how to use video cameras.
36 I need additional training on how to use speakers and microphones.
99
I need expert training in the following to present my subject remotely:
37 YouTube MS Teams Zoom Skype
MOODLE 1 BrightSpace 2 Other Not Applicable
38 If other, please specify
Please indicate anything else in the space provided concerning your training needs:
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
NOT APPLICABLE
COMPLETELY
SOMEWHAT
DISAGREE
AGREE
AGREE
AGREE
A desktop computer or laptop with high-quality features and capabilities is
39
essential for remote learning.
I have a desktop computer or laptop computer that is adequate to engage in
40
remote learning.
41 Interactive whiteboards are necessary for remote learning.
42 Data projectors are essential for remote learning.
43 Video cameras are essential for remote learning.
44 Speakers and microphones are essential for remote learning.
45 Light pens and scanners are essential for remote learning.
46 Broadband internet access is a requirement for remote learning.
47 Remote learning requires the best, fast and strong internet access.
48 24/7 internet access off-site or at home is essential for remote learning.
49 The campus/college has an adequate online learning platform.
50 Multimedia projectors with white screens are essential for remote learning.
51 Interactive software is essential for my subject for remote learning.
52 Electronic simulation software is essential for my subject for remote learning.
53 Additional external storage devices are needed for creating backups.
Power points are needed in strategic points around the campus and the
54
classrooms.
Links to educational websites, digital libraries and e-journals are essential for
55
remote learning.
Please provide comments on any of the above that you wish to bring to my attention:
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
1
Modular-Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment.
2
A Learning Management System for academic staff and students.
Opening
A. (Establish Rapport) Greet and introduce myself in my capacity as a Master’s Degree
student and explain the background of the research.
C. (Motivation) I hope to use this interview to understand how you as the leader of the
department aim to ensure that lecturers are furnished with the training and resource needs
for remote learning and I also hope to use this information to develop guidelines for training
of lecturers for remote learning.
E. (Transition): The recent outbreak of the corona-virus has not only exposed but also
exacerbated the need that has always been there, for TVET colleges to adopt another
paradigm for teaching and learning and move away from being 100% face-to-face
contact learning institutions. The focal point of our discussion is on the lecturers needs in
terms of training and resources as the college and DHET plans the shift to promote more
remote learning paradigms.
102
The Body
103
i. What strategies have you applied in your department to ensure that all
lecturers are compliant and reach the optimal level of remote learning
training?
ii. If there are any outstanding physical resources needed by lecturers for
remote learning. How do you ensure that they are procured and reach the
lecturers timeously?
iii. As a leader, how are you going to assist your staff balance remote learning
and face-to-face learning?
iv. How have you ensured that the remote learning training received by
lecturers meets global standards?
7) Can you tell me more about how the issues of connectivity and data-availability is
attended to at this TVET college?
8) A final question:
a. How do you think this TVET college campus is transitioning to remote learning?
b. What in your opinion does leadership need to put in place to achieve the
transition to remote learning at this institution?
107
NV NYEMBE Page 108 of 179
NV NYEMBE Page 109 of 179
NV NYEMBE Page 110 of 179
NV NYEMBE Page 111 of 179
APPENDIX 7: Qualitative survey summarised (graphical) results
0 20 40 60 80
NATED-Business Studies
NATED- Engineering Studies
28.8% NCV
23.3%
47.9%
23.3%
24.7%
Female
42.5% Male
Prefer not to say
57.5%
Certificate
41.1% Diploma
Degree
Honours Degree
Masters Degree
Doctorate
39.7% 16.4%
13.7% 5 - 9 Years
16.4%
10 - 14 Years
15 - 20 Years
8.2%
Above 20 Years
8.2%
53.4%
Basic
Moderate
Expert
16.4%
57.5%
26%
21.9%
19.2%
37%
Completely Agree
19.2% Agree
15.1% Agree Somewhat
Disagree
Not Applicable
28.8%
30.1%
Completely Agree
Agree
13.7%
Agree Somewhat
35.6% 9.6% Disagree
Not Applicable
39.7%
42.5%
Completely Agree
Agree
34.2%
Agree Somewhat
12.3%
Disagree
Not Applicable
49.3%
Completely Agree
Agree
32.9% 13.7% Agree Somewhat
Disagree
Not Applicable
47.9%
52.1%
Completely Agree
Agree
34.2%
Agree Somewhat
Disagree
Not Applicable
50.7%
Completely Agree
27.4% Agree
11% Agree Somewhat
Disagree
Not Applicable
46.6%
Completely Agree
35.6% Agree
Agree Somewhat
Disagree
Not Applicable
50.7%
Completely Agree
Agree
15.1%
Agree Somewhat
35.6% Disagree
Not Applicable
41.1%
41.1%
Completely Agree
Agree
35.6%
Agree Somewhat
12.3%
Disagree
Not Applicable
47.9%
Completely Agree
Agree
37%
Agree Somewhat
12.3%
Disagree
Not Applicable
46.6%
8.2% Disagree
34.2% Not Applicable
35.6%
Completely Agree
Agree
15.1% Agree Somewhat
38.4% Disagree
Not Applicable
39.7%
Completely Agree
Agree
13.7% Agree Somewhat
31.5%
Disagree
Not Applicable
46.6%
47.9%
Completely Agree
15.1% Agree
24.7% Agree Somewhat
Disagree
Not Applicable
49.3%
Completely Agree
Agree
35.6% 13.7% Agree Somewhat
Disagree
Not Applicable
45.2%
42.5%
Completely Agree
Agree
41.1% Agree Somewhat
9.6%
Disagree
Not Applicable
43.8%
Completely Agree
Agree
15.1%
Agree Somewhat
31.5%
Disagree
Not Applicable
43.8%
12.3%
38.4%
Completely Agree
Agree
17.8% 21.9% Agree Somewhat
Disagree
Not Applicable
24.7%
31.5%
Completely Agree
Agree
31.5%
Agree Somewhat
20.5% Disagree
Not Applicable
20.5%
26%
57.5%
8.2% Disagree
Not Applicable
50.7%
Completely Agree
Agree
37% 9.6% Agree Somewhat
Disagree
8.2%
Not Applicable
45.2%
Completely Agree
13.7% Agree
Agree Somewhat
30.1% 15.1% Disagree
Not Applicable
41.1%
58.9%
Completely Agree
35.6% Agree
Agree Somewhat
Disagree
Not Applicable
61.6%
Completely Agree
42.5% Agree
Agree Somewhat
Disagree
Not Applicable
50.7%
68.5%
Completely Agree
Agree
23.3% Agree Somewhat
Disagree
Not Applicable
74%
Completely Agree
28.8% Agree
Agree Somewhat
Disagree
Not Applicable
65.8%
13.7%
11%
Completely Agree
Agree
43.8%
Agree Somewhat
9.6% Disagree
Not Applicable
43.8%
Completely Agree
43.8% Agree
Agree Somewhat
Disagree
Not Applicable
54.8%
56.2%
Completely Agree
30.1% Agree
Agree Somewhat
Disagree
Not Applicable
63%
Completely Agree
28.8% Agree
Agree Somewhat
8.2% Disagree
Not Applicable
61.6%
63%
Completely Agree
28.8% Agree
Agree Somewhat
Disagree
Not Applicable
67.1%
134
38 Respondent: not all students are on the same level with financial finances. So not
39 everybody had WhatsApp. Then the college had… you must stop me if I'm talking too
40 much.
41
42 Interviewer: No it's fine, thank you
43
44 Respondent: And then the college came up and said let lecturers start making notes
45 and assignments and tests that we can load it on the college website. We started with
46 that. And luckily lecturers, I also had all the ISATs and the packs on my laptop. So
47 what we did was we send it to the students. But now obviously, only to those who
48 could afford WhatsApp. So we tried and we say the students start doing the packs and
49 the assignment and then you will submit when we reopen. At that stage, we still hope
50 that the opening will not take long. But with NCV we reopened in July, which was quite
51 late. And it started at different times. So you can imagine now, we closed March, July,
52 August, we start with classes. Now you have to do all your assessments. And the
53 department said, luckily, they sent the new guidelines to say we can leave one test.
54 But we were hoping that we'll leave the ISAT because that's the most time-consuming.
55 So coming back July, August, we had assignments to do, we had ISAT to do. And then
56 we saw this, this need, because now obviously, some lecturers got sick, myself was
57 infected with COVID. My lecturers infected me. So I was off five weeks, I was very
58 sick. My lecturers, my old team was about five lecturers at a stage, not here. So that
59 also hampered everything, because now we were too sick, we couldn't work. But what
60 I say to my lecturers is when we reopened, is that students’ assignments, packs, notes,
61 let us print that so that when the students come back in August or July, we will give
62 them the pack and say, this is term two work. And then I can go through it and do the
63 assignments and those that didn't get any. So I must say it worked well, because when
64 we looked at our results, level three results was a level two results was quite good,
65 because we enrolled more level threes than we anticipated.
66
67 Interviewer: Oh that's great.
68
69 Respondents: But it also showed us that NCV can actually be done in a lesser time
70 if you put your mind to any.
71
72 Interviewer: Yes, Yes
73
74 Respondent: But that's it this is a discussion for a different date. So it brought out a
75 lot of issues, to say, lecturers don't have resources, they don't have laptops, they don't
76 have printers. So what are we going to help the students with? WhatsApp alone is not
77 enough. I mean, you can send whatever you want on WhatsApp, it's not enough. Some
78 lecturers had students email addresses. But remember, still, then things were still
This work may be used in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons license
or other rights statement, as indicated in the copyright statement or in the metadata
associated with this work. Unless otherwise specified in the copyright statement
or the metadata, all rights are reserved by the copyright holder.
ProQuest LLC
789 East Eisenhower Parkway
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346 USA