Climate Red Globe Turkey
Climate Red Globe Turkey
Climate Red Globe Turkey
1051/bioconf/20160701007
39th World Congress of Vine and Wine
Abstract. Regional climatic conditions can have a dramatic effect on the degree and rate of natural grape
coloration and quality parameters. In this study it was aimed to evaluate effect of the climate for Red Globe
variety cultivated in Lakes Region which is in Eğirdir town of Isparta city in Turkey. Red Globe grape variety
was evaluated for quality and especially for berry skin coloration and cold storage ability. Study was done
between 2013–2015. Vineyard was designed according to randomized block design with three replicates.
Rational pergola system was used. Excellent berry coloration for Red Globe grape variety was determined
and average quality parameters yield per vine (7.0–9.8 kg), soluble sugar content %16.–17.6) titratable acidity
(4.2–4.4 g/lt), single berry weight (9.0–10.2 g), and phenological observations were done. Yield and other
quality parameters were evaluated well in this period. Grapes were stored in cold storage (NA) conditions
with SO2 and without SO2 pads after harvest. Quality changes were determined in storage period by 1 month
interval, it was carried out with weight loses, fruit skin color, fruit firmness, total soluble solids, pH, titratable
acidity, sensual evaluations, microbiological and shelf life analyzes. It was evaluated that with SO2 pads Red
Globe variety can be stored commercially up to 90–100 days. It was determined that climate of the region had
a good positive effect on the excellent coloration and quality parameters and cold storage performance of the
Red Globe.
c The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
BIO Web of Conferences 7, 01007 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/bioconf/20160701007
39th World Congress of Vine and Wine
2
BIO Web of Conferences 7, 01007 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/bioconf/20160701007
39th World Congress of Vine and Wine
3
BIO Web of Conferences 7, 01007 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/bioconf/20160701007
39th World Congress of Vine and Wine
Evaluations, findings and observations were obtained as 3.2. Quality assessment, Sensory analysis in
a result of these analyses and measurements related to cold storage results
yield quality and color are given in tables 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.
Excellent berry coloration for Red Globe grape variety Grapes were stored in cold storage (NA) conditions
was determined in three years period without any other with So2 and without SO2 pads (control treatment) after
chemical treatments (ABA, ethephon e.t.c) in the trial harvest. Quality changes were determined that occurred
when compared to previous studies. It was evaluated with throughout the storage period by 1 month interval, it
4
BIO Web of Conferences 7, 01007 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/bioconf/20160701007
39th World Congress of Vine and Wine
Table 6. Average colour measurement values of 2013–2014 and Table 9. Cold storage average color analyses in 2013–2014
2014–2015 years. period.
Year L a b c h Treatment Days L a b c h
2013 36.5 a 2.05 a −3.3 a 4.21 a 293.5 a SO2 treated 0 36.5 2.05 −3.3 4.21 293.5
2014 SO2 treated 30 36.1 2.02 −3.2 4.18 291.3
2014 37.4 a 1.88 a −3.8 a 4.54 a 289.4 a SO2 treated 60 35.7 1.99 −3.2 4.15 286.4
2015 SO2 treated 90 35.5 1.95 −3.0 4.10 280.1
* Grouping with same letter are not significantly different. SO2 treated 120 35.0 1.94 −2.9 4.08 278.2
Average 36.6 a 1.99 a −3.1 a 4.14 a 285.1 a
Table 7. Cold storage average quality analyses in 2013–2014 Untreated 0 36.5 2.05 −3.3 4.21 293.5
period. Untreated 30 35.1 1.95 −3.0 4.11 287.5
Untreated 60 34.8 1.81 −2.8 4.02 275.1
Treatment Days Weight Total pH Titra. Untreated 90 33.6 1.78 −2.6 3.92 269.4
Loss soluble Acidity
Untreated 120 33.2 1.74 −2.5 3.87 264.8
(kg) Solids % (g/l)
Average 34.6 b 1.86 b 2.8 b 4.02 b 277.2 a
SO2 treated 0 5.00 16.0 3.03 4.6
* Grouping with same letter are not significantly different.
SO2 treated 30 4.88 16.4 3.11 4.5
SO2 treated 60 4.70 16.5 3.06 4.7
SO2 treated 90 4.70 16.5 3.15 5.1 Table 10. Cold storage average color analyses in 2014–2015
SO2 treated 120 4.56 16.6 3.17 5.2 period.
Average 4.76 a 16.4 b 3.10 a 4.8 a Treatment Days L a b c h
Untreated 0 5.00 16.0 3.03 4.6 SO2 treated 0 37.4 a 1.88 −3.8 4.54 289.4
Untreated 30 4.60 16.4 3.16 4.6 SO2 treated 30 36.4 a 1.85 −3.6 4.36 290.2
Untreated 60 4.36 16.6 3.21 4.9 SO2 treated 60 35.3 1.80 −3.4 4.13 284.5
Untreated 90 4.25 17.0 3.23 5.2 SO2 treated 90 35.0 1.77 −3.3 4.11 281.2
Untreated 120 4.15 17.4 3.26 5.5 SO2 treated 120 34.6 1.73 −3.0 4.07 277.5
Average 4.47 b 16.7 a 3.17 a 4.9 a Average 35.7 a 1.80 a 3.4 a 4.28 a 284.3 a
* Grouping with same letter are not significantly different. Untreated 0 37.4 1.88 −3.8 4.54 289.4
Untreated 30 34.8 1.70 −3.2 4.08 286.5
Table 8. Cold storage average quality analyses in 2014–2015 Untreated 60 34.0 1.59 −3.0 4.00 273.0
period. Untreated 90 33.2 b 1.54 −2.6 3.89 267.2
Untreated 120 32.7 b 1.51 −2.2 3.82 262.4
Treatment Days Weight Total pH Titra.
Average 34.4 b 1.64 b 2.9 b 4.06 b 269.1 b
Loss soluble Acidity
(kg) Solids % (g/l) * Grouping with same letter are not significantly different.
SO2 treated 0 5.00 16.5 3.08 4.6
SO2 treated 30 4.91 16.7 3.15 4.4 Table 11. Cold storage average sensory analyses in 2013–2014
SO2 treated 60 4.82 16.4 3.16 4.8 period.
SO2 treated 90 4.70 16.8 3.20 5.0
SO2 treated 120 4.62 16.8 3.16 5.0 Treatment Days So2 taste Rachis Visual app. Flavor,
Average 4.81 a 16.6 a 3.15 a 4.76 b and Odor Rachis Crunchiness
Untreated 0 5.00 16.5 3.08 4.6 SO2 treated 0 1 1 9
Untreated 30 4.68 16.4 3.14 4.8 SO2 treated 30 1 1 7
Untreated 60 4.52 16.8 3.26 5.1 SO2 treated 60 1 1 7
Untreated 90 4.35 17.0 3.28 5.3 SO2 treated 90 3 2 7
Untreated 120 4.21 17.0 3.31 5.3 SO2 treated 120 3 2 5
Average 4.52 b 16.7 a 3.21 a 5.0 a Untreated 0 1 1 9
Untreated 30 1 2 7
* Grouping with same letter are not significantly different.
Untreated 60 1 2 5
Untreated 90 1 3 5
was carried out with weight loses, fruit skin color, total Untreated 120 1 4 3
soluble solids, pH, titratable acidity, sensual evaluations,
microbiological analyzes.
In both years of the study, much deterioration was 60th day of storage in the first year. In the last sampling
observed during the 60 days of storage. However, in the period, the differences among the effects on the L ∗ color
both, at the end of 90, 120 days of storage, moderate values were significant (Tables 9, 10). The effects of the
deterioration (spotting or decay up to 1/5-2/5 of the bunch) treatment SO2 on the a ∗ color values of the grapes during
was observed in the grapes with untreated treatment. storage was significant in both study years. The a ∗ colour
Botrytis cinerea was identified to be the causal agent of values ranged between 2.05 and 1.74 in the first year and
decay. Grapes sampled on the 120th day of storage with between 1.88 and 1.51 in the second year (Tables 9, 10).
untreated application were discarded for the analysis, as The b∗ color values of the grapes varied between −3.8
they had lost marketability. and −2.2.
While the effect of the covering materials on the L ∗ Grapes were evaluated with respect to visual ap-
color Values was significant in both year The L ∗ values of pearance, flavor and crunchiness in storage. SO2 treated
the grapes treated were higher during the pre-storage and application on the 60th and 90th day of storage the scores
5
BIO Web of Conferences 7, 01007 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/bioconf/20160701007
39th World Congress of Vine and Wine
Table 12. Cold storage average sensory analyses in 2014–2015 [2] S. N. Ghosh, Tarai R. and P. Pal. Acta Hort. 785,
period. P:73–77 (2008)
Treatment Days So2 taste Rachis Visual app. Flavor,
[3] FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of United
and Odor Rachis Crunchiness Nations. Available online at: http://faostat3.
SO2 treated 0 1 1 9 fao.org/download/Q/*/E (2013)
SO2 treated 30 1 1 7 [4] TUIK, Turkiye istatistik kurumu. Available online at:
SO2 treated 60 1 1 7 http://tuikapp.tuik.gov.tr/bitkiselapp/
SO2 treated 90 1 2 7 bitkisel.zul (2013)
SO2 treated 120 3 2 5 [5] White M. A, Diffenbaugh N. S, Jones GV, Pal
Untreated 0 1 1 9 J. S, Giorgi F. (2006). Extreme heat reduces and
Untreated 30 1 2 7 shifts United States Premium wine production in the
Untreated 60 1 3 5 21st century. Proc National Academy Science USA
Untreated 90 1 3 3 103:11217–11222
Untreated 120 1 4 3 [6] Hall A, Jones G. V. (2009). Effect of potential
atmospheric warming on temperature-based indices
describing Australian winegrape growing conditions.
were between 7 (good) in both study years. In both years, Aust J Grape Wine Res 15:97–119
at the end of the storage (120th day) the grapes untreated [7] Jones G. V., White M. A, Cooper O. R, Storchmann
with untreated scored 3 in 90 120 days. Neither the taste K. (2005). Climate change and global wine quality.
nor odor was observed at moderate or severe levels during Climate Change 73: 319–343
storage in both study years. In both years, only at the end [8] Webb L. B, Whetton P. H, Barlow EWR (2007).
of 90, 120 days storage period, untreated scored 3 with Modelled impact of future climate change on the
respect to stem browning (Tables 11, 12). phenology of winegrapes in Australia. Australian
Journal of Grape Wine Res 13:165–175
4. Conclusion [9] V. T. K. Oanh, K. Matsumoto, Y. S. Hwang, and J.
Region’s ecological characterics showed that late time P. Chun. 2010. Changes of cell wall olysaccharides
maturated table grape varieties are more important for during berry ripening in grapes (Vitis spp.). Hort.
production. Lakes region has no chance to produce earlier Environ. Biotechnol. 51: 513–519
because of ecological conditions. There many place to [10] L. Taiz and E. Zeiger. 1991. Plant physiology.The
produce earlier than Lakes Region in Turkey, so the late Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company. Inc.,
time maturated varieties are very important in the region California. p. 473–489
for commercial production. [11] K. Mori, N. Goto-Yamamoto, M. Kitayama, and
Fruit skin coloration is an important factor for K. Hashizume 2007. Loss of anthocyanins in red-
especially red table grapes. Red Globe had gained well wine grape under high temperatures. Journal of Exp.
coloration according to other Red Globe cultivation areas Botany 58: 1935–1945
without any chemical or etc. in the Lakes Region. This is [12] W. M. Kliewer and R. E. Torres. 1972. Effect of
a very good advantage for cultivating this variety in the controlled day and night temperatures on grape
region. It was determined that climate of the region had a coloration. American Journal of Enology Viticulture
good positive effect on the excellent coloration and quality 23: 71–77
parameters and cold storage performance of the Red Globe [13] Jones G. V, Reid R, Vilks, A. 2012. Climate, Grapes,
grape variety. It is advised to growers cultivate Red Globe and Wine: Structure and Suitability in a Variable and
variety to increase economical income in the region and Changing Climate pp 109–133 in The Geography of
also advised to the other regions which has same climate Wine: Regions, Terrior, and Techniques, edited by
conditions. Producing the right grape variety (Red Globe) P. Dougherty. Springer Press, 255 pp
by the results of the study will contribute economically to [14] White M. A, Whalen P, Jones, GV. 2009. Land and
farmers region and country. Wine. Nature Geoscience 2: 82–84
It was evaluated that with SO2 pads Red Globe variety [15] Franka M. G., J. Mercier, J.I. Jiménezc J.L. Smilan-
can be stored commercially up to 90–100 days. It was ick (2010). Integration of continuous biofumigation
determined that climate of the region had a good positive with Muscodor albus with pre-cooling fumigation
effect on the excellent coloration and quality parameters with ozone or sulfur dioxide to control postharvest
and cold storage performance of the Red Late time gray mold of table grapes. Postharvest Biology
varieties were good for region’s conditions. Especially Technology 55 (2):78–84
coloration of late time harvested varieties were perfect in [16] Jane L. G., L. L. Kang, A.C. Michael, A.E. Stuart,
the region because of high differences night and morning L. D. Valgene (2010). Postharvest management of
temperatures. Region has a good potential cultivating late gray mold and brown rot on surfaces of peaches
time varieties. Cool storage conditions are also suitable in and grapes using electrolyzed oxidizing water. Int. J.
the region. Stored table grapes can be given to trade well Food Microbiology 143 (1):54–60
in the region by late harvest. [17] Qin X., H. Xiao, C. Xue, Z. Yu, R. Yang, Z.
Cai and L. Si (2015). Biocontrol of gray mold in
References grapes with the yeast Hanseniasporauvarum alone
and in combination with salicylic acid or sodium
[1] V. N. Gowda, S. A. Keshava, and S. Shyamalamma. bicarbonate. Postharvest Biology Technology 100
Acta Hort. 785, p: 207–211 (2008) (2):160–167
6
BIO Web of Conferences 7, 01007 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/bioconf/20160701007
39th World Congress of Vine and Wine
[18] Anna, M.T., A.D., Alessandro, M. Fagioni, P. [23] Perkins-Veazie, P. M., Collins, J. K., Lloid, J., &
Magro and L. Zoll (2012). Production of the Striegler, R. K. (1992). Influence of package on
phytoalexins trans-resveratrol and delta-viniferin in post-harvest quality of Oklahoma and Arkansas table
two economy-relevant grape cultivars upon infection grapes. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture,
with Botrytis cinerea in field conditions. Plant 43(1), 79–82
Physiology Biochemistry 50(1):65–71 [24] Ruiz, D., Egea, J., Tomas-Barberan, F. A., &
[19] Simona M. S., L. Schena, V.D. Cicco, A. Ippolito Gil, M. I. (2005).Carotenoids from new apricot
(2012). Early detection of Botrytis cinerea latent (Prunusarmeniaca L.) varieties and their relationship
infections as a tool to improve postharvest quality with flesh and skin color. Journal of Agricultura-
of table grapes. Postharvest Biology Technology 68: land Food Chemistry, 53(16), 6368–6374. http://
64–71. 20 dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf0480703. PMid:
[20] Crisosto, C. H., & Mitchell, F. G. (2002). Postharvest 16076120
handling systems: table grapes. In: A. A. Kader [25] Karacali, I. (2009). Storage and marketing of
(Ed.), Postharvest technology of horticultural crops. horticultural products (Ege University Agriculture
(Agricultural and Natural Resources Publication, Faculty Publication, No. 494). Bornova, İzmir
No. 3311, pp. 357-363). Oakland: University of [26] Artés-Hernandez, F., Pagán, E.M., Artés, F., 2002.
California New ozone treatments during prolonged stor-
[21] Crisosto, C. H., & Smilanick, J. L. (2004). age for keeping quality of late harvested table
Grape (Table). In: K. C. Gross, C. Yi Wang & grape In: Proceedings of the International Sym-
M. Saltveit (Eds.), The commercial storage of posium on Emergent Technologies. Madrid, Spain,
fruits, vegetables and florist and nursery stocks s. 52
(Agricultural Handbook, No. 66, pp. 287–290). [27] Fraga H, Malheiro A. C, Moutinho-Pereira, J. and
Beltsville: USDA J. A. Santos. 2012. An overview of climate change
[22] Sen, F., Altun, A., Kesgin, M., & Inan, M. S. (2012). impacts on European viticulture. Food and Energy
Effect of different shading practices used in the pre- Security 1(2): 94–110
harvest stage on quality and storage life of sultana [28] Jones G. V, White M. A, Cooper O. R, Storchmann
seedless grapes. Journal of Agricultural Science and K. 2005a. Climate Change and Global Wine Quality.
Technology B, 2, 1234–1240 Climatic Change 73(3): 319–343