Ao Classificati
Ao Classificati
Ao Classificati
Long Bones
Hazards
Great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of the information contained in this work. However,
neither AO and/or a distributor and/or the authors of this work can be held responsible for errors
or any consequences arising from the use of the information contained in this work. Contributions
published under the name of individual authors are statements and opinions solely of said authors
and not of AO.
The products, procedures, and therapies described in this work are hazardous and are therefore only to
be applied by cer tifi ed and trained medical professionals in environments specially designed for such
procedures. No suggested test or procedure should be carried out unless, in the user’s professional
judgment, its risk is justifi ed. Whoever applies products, procedures, and therapies shown or described
in this work will do this at his/her own risk. Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, AO
recommends that independent verifi cation of diagnosis, therapies, drugs, dosages, and operation
methods should be made before any action is taken.
Although all adver tising material which may be inser ted into the work is expected to conform to ethical
(medical) standards, inclusion in this work does not constitute a guarantee or endorsement of the
quality or value of such product or of the claims made of it by its manufacturer.
Legal restrictions
This work was produced by AO Publishing and AO International, Davos, Switzerland. All rights reserved
by AO Publishing. This work contains works protected by copyright, trademark, and other laws.
Prohibited are in par ticular any commercial use as well as any copying of the work. It is prohibited to
This leaflet is designed to provide an accessible and make this work or any par ts thereof available on any Intranet or on the Internet or to create derivative
works based on the works contained in this work.
straightforward introduction to making an initial Restrictions on use: The rightful owner of an authorized copy of this work may use it for educational
classification of long-bone fractures. For more and research purposes only. Single images or illustrations may be copied for research or educational
purposes only. The images or illustrations may not be altered in any way and need to carry the following
detailed treatment of the subject it is advisable to statement of origin “Copyright by AO Publishing, Switzerland”.
consult the references from the attached list. Some names, instruments, treatments, logos, designs, etc. referred to in this work are also protected by
patents and trademarks or by other intellectual property protection laws (eg, “AO”, “ASIF”, “AO/ASIF”,
“TRIANGLE/GLOBE Logo” are registered trademarks) even though specifi c reference to this fact is not
always made in the work. Therefore, the appearance of a name, instrument, etc. without designation as
proprietary is not to be construed as a representation by AO that it is in the public domain.
Müller AO
Classification of Fractures
The concept
When the long-bone classification was first published [1] the observer was The classification of the fractures is organized in order of increasing
offered a choice from a progressive sequence of 3 options, relative to each severity, according to the morphological complexity, the difficulty of
of three bone segments, to establish the TYPE, GROUP, and SUBGRUOP treatment, and the prognosis. The colors green, orange, and red, as well
of the fracture. Müller et al. have since introduced the binary concept, as the darkening of arrows, indicate the increasing severity. A1 indicates
where each question has two alternative answers. Thus, while retaining the simplest fracture with the best prognosis and C3 the most difficult
the triad-based concept, it is ultimately possible to arrive precisely at one with the worst prognosis. When one has classified the fracture group,
of two conclusions, either the correct diagnosis or the realization that one has established its severity and thus obtained a guide to treatment.
more information is needed [2, 3, 4]. The subgroups represent three characteristic variations within the group.
The Müller concept goes beyond the mere production of an alpha-numeric
coding, valuable though that is in the acquisition, storage, and retrieval
of data; what distinguishes Müller’s system is that one is required to
recognize, identify, and describe the injury to the bone [5].
Coding of the diagnosis
The discipline of the alpha-numeric notation serves to guide the assessor To code the diagnosis of a fracture one must know its location and its
of the fracture to whatever depth the situation requires and afterwards to morphology.
record and store his observations. However, it is the surgeon’s description
of the fracture which is needed to permit good decision making in the
light of the structured observations required by the classification proto- Location: this is designated by two numbers:
col, and as well as to generate the code. which bone? 1 humerus 2 radius/ulna 3 femur 4 tibia/fibula
which segment? 1 proximal 2 diaphyseal 3 distal 4 malleolar
Group A1…C3
Group
123 . Subgroup
.1 .2 .3
fractures.
The wordings of the captions under the illustrations on the following pages
The terms wedge and complex are used only for diaphyseal or have to be read in the order of the alpha-numeric code.
metaphyseal fractures.
• wedge: A fracture with one or more intermediate fragments in which, Example 32-B2.1:
after reduction, there is some contact between the main fragments. 3 2 - B 2 .1
The spiral or bending wedge may be intact or fragmented. femur diaphysis wedge bending subtro-
• complex: A fracture with one or more intermediate fragments in fracture wedge chanteric
which, after reduction, there is no contact between the main proximal
and distal fragments. The complex fractures are spiral, segmented, or
irregular. The essence
The term comminuted is imprecise and should not be used. Müller places great emphasis on appreciating the essence of the fracture.
This is the attribute which gives the fracture its particular significance and
impacted: A stable and usually simple fracture of the metaphysis or enables it to be assigned to one particular type rather than another. After
epiphysis in which the fragments are driven into each other. this comes the process of putting into words what the surgeon understands
as prime characteristics of the fracture, the challenges it brings, how it is to
be managed, and what outcome may be anticipated with proper treatment
[7]. The observer should express in words what he sees on the emergency
x-ray and then try to match its features to a basic diagram on the leaflet.
Specific terms for the proximal and distal segments This will provide a starting point on the hierarchical path to accurate
diagnosis, although for complex variations reference will be needed to
Fractures of the proximal and distal segments are either extra-articular the comprehensive texts listed below [8].
or articular.
References:
extra-articular fractures: do not involve the articular surface although 1. Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P (1987) Classification AO des fractures: les os longs.
they may be intracapsular. They include apophyseal and metaphyseal Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer-Verlag.
fractures. Articular fractures involve the articular suface. They are 2. Rüedi TP, Murphy WM, et al. (2000) AO Principles of Fracture Management.
subdivided into partial and complete. Davos: AO Publishing & Stuttgart New York: Georg Thieme Verlag.
3. Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, et al. (1990) The Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones.
partial articular fractures: involve only part of the articular surface Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer-Verlag.
while the rest of that surface remains attached to the diaphysis. 4. Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Schneider R, et al. (1991) Manual of Internal Fixation. 3rd ed.
Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer-Verlag.
Types of partial articular fractures: 5. Colton CL (1997) Fracture classification. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]; 79(5):706–707; discussion 708–709.
• pure split: A fracture, resulting from a shearing force, in which the 6. Bernstein J, Monaghan BA, Silber JS, et al. (1997) Taxonomy and treatment—a classification of fracture
classifications. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]; 79(5):706–707; discussion 708–709.
direction of the split is usually longitudinal.
7. Orozco R, Sales JM, Videla M (2000) Atlas of Internal Fixation. Fractures of Long Bones.
• pure depression: An articular fracture in which there is depression of Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer-Verlag.
the articular surface without a split. The depression may be central or 8. Müller ME (1994) CCF Comprehensive Classification of Fractures. Pamphlet I and II.
Bern: M.E. Müller Foundation.
peripheral.
• split-depression: A combination of a split and a depression, in which
the joint fragments are usually separated.
• multifragmentary depression: A fracture in which part of the joint © 2006 by AO Publishing Switzerland
is depressed and the fragments are completely separated. Clavadelerstrasse, CH–7270 Davos Platz
complete articular fractures: The articular surface is disrupted and phone: +41 (0)81 414 26 66
completely separated from the diaphysis. The severity of these fractures publishing @ aofoundation.org
depends on whether their articular and metaphyseal components are www.aopublishing.org ISBN 3-905363-03-8 US$ 5.–
simple or multifragmentary.
1 Humerus
11-A extra-articular unifocal fracture 11-B extra-articular bifocal fracture 11-C articular fracture
11-A1 tuberosity 11-B1 with metaphyseal impaction 11-C1 with slight displacement
11-A2 impacted metaphyseal 11-B2 without metaphyseal impaction 11-C2 impacted with marked displacement
11-A3 nonimpacted metaphyseal 11-B3 with glenohumeral dislocation 11-C3 dislocated
12 diaphysis
12-A1 12-A2 12-A3 12-B1 12-B2 12-B3 12-C1 12-C2 12-C3
13 distal
13-A1 13-A2 13-A3 13-B1 13-B2 13-B3 13-C1 13-C2 13-C3
13-A extra-articular fracture 13-B partial articular fracture 13-C complete articular fracture
13-A1 apophyseal avulsion 13-B1 sagittal lateral condyle 13-C1 articular simple, metaphyseal simple
13-A2 metaphyseal simple 13-B2 sagittal medial condyle 13-C2 articular simple, metaphyseal multifragmentary
13-A3 metaphyseal multifragmentary 13-B3 frontal 13-C3 articular multifragmentary
2 Radius / Ulna
21 proximal
21-A1 21-A2 21-A3 21-B1 21-B2 21-B3 21-C1 21-C2 21-C3
21-A extra-articular fracture 21-B articular fracture 21-C articular fracture of both bones
21-A1 ulna, radius intact 21-B1 ulna, radius intact 21-C1 simple
21-A2 radius, ulna intact 21-B2 radius, ulna intact 21-C2 one artic. simple, other artic. multifragmentary
21-A3 both bones 21-B3 one bone, other extra-atricular 21-C3 multifragmentary
22 diaphysis
22-A1 22-A2 22-A3 22-B1 22-B2 22-B3 22-C1 22-C2 22-C3
23 distal
23-A1 23-A2 23-A3 23-B1 23-B2 23-B3 23-C1 23-C2 23-C3
23-A extra-articular fracture 23-B partial articular fracture 23-C complete articular fracture of radius
23-A1 ulna, radius intact 23-B1 radius, sagittal 23-C1 articular simple, metaphyseal simple
23-A2 radius, simple and impacted 23-B2 radius, frontal, dorsal rim 23-C2 articular simple, metaphyseal multifragmentary
23-A3 radius, multifragmentary 23-B3 radius, frontal, volar rim 23-C3 articular multifragmentary
3 Femur
31 proximal; defined by a line passing transversely through the lower end of the lesser trochanter
31-A extra-articular fracture, trochanteric area 31-B extra-articular fracture, neck 31-C articular fracture, head
31-A1 pertrochanteric simple 31-B1 subcapital, with slight displacement 31-C1 split (Pipkin)
31-A2 pertrochanteric multifragmentary 31-B2 transcervical 31-C2 with depression
31-A3 intertrochanteric 31-B3 subcapital, displaced, nonimpacted 31-C3 with neck fracture
32 diaphysis
32-A1 32-A2 32-A3 32-B1 32-B2 32-B3 32-C1 32-C2 32-C3
33 distal
33-A1 33-A2 33-A3 33-B1 33-B2 33-B3 33-C1 33-C2 33-C3
33-A extra-articular fracture 33-B partial articular fracture 33-C complete articular fracture
33-A1 simple 33-B1 lateral condyle, sagittal 33-C1 articular simple, metaphyseal simple
33-A2 metaphyseal wedge and/or fragmented wedge 33-B2 medial condyle, sagittal 33-C2 artic. simple, metaphyseal multifragmentary
33-A3 metaphyseal complex 33-B3 frontal 33-C3 articular multifragmentary
4 Tibia / Fibula
41 proximal
41-A1 41-A2 41-A3 41-B1 41-B2 41-B3 41-C1 41-C2 41-C3
41-A extra-articular fracture 41-B partial articular fracture 41-C complete articular fracture
41-A1 avulsion 41-B1 pure split 41-C1 articular simple, metaphyseal simple
41-A2 metaphyseal simple 41-B2 pure depression 41-C2 artic. simple, metaphyseal multifragmentary
41-A3 metaphyseal multifragmentary 41-B3 split-depression 41-C3 articular multifragmentary
42 diaphysis
42-A1 42-A2 42-A3 42-B1 42-B2 42-B3 42-C1 42-C2 42-C3
43 distal
43-A1 43-A2 43-A3 43-B1 43-B2 43-B3 43-C1 43-C2 43-C3
43-A extra-articular fracture 43-B partial articular fracture 43-C complete articular fracture
43-A1 simple 43-B1 pure split 43-C1 articular simple, metaphyseal simple
43-A2 wedge 43-B2 split-depression 43-C2 artic. simple, metaphyseal multifragmentary
43-A3 complex 43-B3 multifragmentary depression 43-C3 articular multifragmentary
44 malleolar segment ; based on the relationship of the lateral malleolar lesion to the syndesmotic ligament
44-A1 44-A2 44-A3 44-B1 44-B2 44-B3 44-C1 44-C2 44-C3
44-A infrasyndesmotic lesion 44-B transsyndesmotic fibular fracture 44-C suprasyndesmotic lesion
44-A1 isolated 44-B1 isolated 44-C1 fibular diaphyseal fracture, simple
44-A2 with fractured medial malleolus 44-B2 with medial lesion 44-C2 fibular diaphyseal fracture, multifragmentary
44-A3 with posteromedial fracture 44-B3 with medial lesion and a Volkmann 44-C3 proximal fibular lesion