Rifampicin Inhibitor of Hepatic Cancer
Rifampicin Inhibitor of Hepatic Cancer
Rifampicin Inhibitor of Hepatic Cancer
Patient no. Sex Age Platelet Serum Serum ALT a-Fetoprotein HCV Associated Total Rifampicin
(y) (104/mm3) albumin (IU/L; (ng/mL; diseases follow-up therapy
(mg/dL) normal normal period (mo) period (mo)
8–48) 0–10)
Genotype Copy no.
(kEq)
had reached 200 mm3, animals were moved to a cage supplied with implanted into a subcutaneous dorsal air sac formed in a 9- or 10-wk-old
sterile drinking water containing either 0.2 mg/mL rifampicin/0.25% female Crlj:CD1 (ICR) mouse by injecting f8 mL of air. Each group of mice
DMSO or 0.25% DMSO alone. Tumor growth during the treatment period treated with tumor cells was given via a gastric tube with 0, 100, or 200 mg/
was monitored by measuring the tumor mass on the animals using kg/d rifampicin once a day or with 200 mg/kg/d silibinin twice daily as a
vernier calipers thrice a week. Tumor volume was calculated as the positive control for 5 d. Rifampicin was dissolved to 10 or 20 mg/mL using
product of length (width)2 0.52. The well-established Lewis lung 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose sodium and silibinin to 10 mg/mL (0.9% NaCl,
carcinoma xenograft experiment was done by Shibayagi, Inc. LL/2 cells 3% ethanol, 1% Tween 80, and 6.6 mmol/L NaOH). The nontumor control
(106 per animal) were s.c. injected into the flank of 8-wk-old male group, which received chambers containing PBS in place of Sarcoma 180
athymic BALB/c AnNCrj-nu/nu mice (Japan Charles Liver). Animals were cells, was given the vehicle alone. On day 5, the implanted chambers were
started on 0.8 mg rifampicin, 3-formyl rifamycin SV, rifamycin SV, or removed from the subcutaneous fascia of the treated animals, and then a
double-distilled water (ddH2O) via a gastric tube once daily during black ring (Sanko Kagaku, Hiroshima) with the same inner diameter as the
weekdays when the tumor volume had reached 200 mm3. The tumor Millipore ring was inserted at the same site. The angiogenic response was
volume was calculated thrice a week as described above. Each group assessed under a dissecting microscope by counting newly formed blood
contained seven mice. On termination of the efficacy portion of the vessels >3 mm in length within the area encircled by the black ring. The
experiment, animals were euthanized; liver and lungs were excised, neovessels were morphologically distinguishable from the preexisting
sectioned, and photographed; and the ratio of metastatic to total section background vessels by their tortuous nature.
area was calculated. Tumor volume and metastasis data of treated Cell culture. Rat pulmonary arterial endothelial cells (rPEC) and rat
groups were compared with those of the control group using Wilcoxon’s aortic endothelial cells (rAEC) prepared from the pulmonary artery and
rank sum test. aorta of male Wistar rats, respectively, and diploid rat fibroblasts have been
In vivo transsplenic liver metastasis model. The growth of the A549 described previously (9, 12, 13). Human dermal microvascular endothelial
human lung cancer cells metastasized into liver was evaluated by cells (hMVEC) and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (hUVEC) were
Panapharm Laboratories, essentially as described previously (10). In brief, purchased from Kurabo and Sanko-Junyaku, and human retinal endothelial
1.5 106 cells in 0.05 mL PBS were injected into the medial splenic tip of cells (hREC) from Cell Systems Corporation. Human colon carcinoma cells,
the anesthetized BALB/cA Jcl-nu nu/nu mice (Japan Crea Laboratory) CW-2, human gastric cancer cells, MKN-1, and human liver cancer cells,
through a left lateral flank incision. No significant bleeding or extravasation HepG2, were purchased from RIKEN BioResource Center Cell Bank.
was encountered. After 10 min, the spleen was removed to avoid Endothelial cell migration, proliferation, and apoptosis assays.
intrasplenic tumor growth. Four days after injection, the treated mice were Anchorage-dependent cell migration was assessed using the monolayer-
divided into four groups and were started on 0, 50, or 100 mg/kg/d denuding protocol as described previously (14). Confluent cultures of
rifampicin or 30 mg/kg/d 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) via a gastric tube once daily endothelial cells in collagen-coated dishes were pretreated with or without
during weekdays. Rifampicin was dissolved to 0, 5, or 10 mg/mL using 0.5% rifampicin for 16 h, and then denuded with a surgical blade. Cells were
carboxymethylcellulose sodium solution, and 10 mL/kg/d was administered further incubated in 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS) supplemented with
at 10 a.m. after a 2-h fast. After 3 wk, the animals were anesthetized; blood growth factors, whereas phase-contrast photomicroscopy was done at the
was withdrawn for the measurement of CA15-3; and the animals were indicated times at four distinct sites, and the cell migration rate was
sacrificed to examine macroscopic metastasis as well as micrometastasis measured. DNA synthesis in confluent cultures was negligible during the
after fixation. monolayer wounding experiments, and repopulation within 24 h was
Mouse dorsal air sac assay. Malignant tumor cell–induced angiogenesis almost entirely to the result of cell migration (9). Exponentially proliferating
was assessed by Panapharm Laboratories (Kumamoto, Japan) as described cells plated in 24-well plates were incubated for 24, 48, or 72 h in the
(11). A Millipore chamber prepared by covering both sides with Millipore presence or absence of indicated concentrations of rifampicin, rifamycin SV,
filters (0.45-mm pore size) was filled with 5 106 Sarcoma 180 cells or 3-formyl rifamycin SV. Cells were then released from culture plates by
suspended in 0.15 mL PBS. The tumor cell–containing chamber was trypsinization, and cell numbers counted using a Sysmex CDA-500
Autoanalyzer (Toa Medical Electronics) as described previously (9, 15, 16). Results
Proapoptotic effects were evaluated by adding rifampicin to growing cell
cultures and determining caspase-3 levels as described previously (17). Clinical benefit of low-dose, long-term oral rifampicin in six
Evaluation of antitumor activity using a human cancer cell line patients with hepatitis C virus–related liver cirrhosis. Since
panel coupled with a drug sensitivity database. A human cancer cell line 1994, six patients (one male and five females, 58.2 F 3.8 years at
panel, composed of 39 cell lines combined with a database for evaluating initial visit), confirmed to have HCV-related liver cirrhosis,
the cell growth inhibition profile, originally established according to the volunteered to receive low-dose oral rifampicin therapy (Table 1).
method of the National Cancer Institute (18, 19), was done by Takao Yamori They were at high risk for the development of HCC (24); therefore,
(Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research), they received monthly follow-up by a hepatologist (Y.T.) and 4- to
as previously described (20, 21). Antitumor activity was assessed by changes 6-monthly examinations using liver ultrasound, MRI, and/or CT. All
in total cellular protein after 48-h rifampicin treatment using a sulforhod- six patients had HCV genotype Ib with high HCV RNA levels (110–
amine B assay (20, 22).
20,000 kIU/mL), suggesting resistance to IFN-a therapy (25).
Gene inhibition profile determined by real-time quantitative
reverse transcription-PCR. Exponentially growing hMVECs or hUVECs Patient 1 received IFN-a treatment in 1991 and 1992 without a
supplemented with FBS and growth factors in 6-cm dishes (106 cells) were virological or sustained biochemical response. He had mitral
treated with the indicated concentrations of rifampicin, rifamycin SV, and 3- regurgitation as a result of ruptured chordae tendineae but did not
diameter developed in the S8 portion, which was treated with (Fig. 1B). Patient 3 was referred to Y.T. in February 1998. IFN-a
transarterial embolization and percutaneous ethanol injection. therapy reduced her a-fetoprotein but was discontinued because of
Since then, he had just had rifampicin therapy, initially 300 mg and, adverse reactions. In August 1999, her a-fetoprotein increased to
after September 1996, 150 mg daily. A mass of 1.5-cm diameter was 129.2 ng/mL and she was started on rifampicin 150 mg daily, which
detected on the liver surface S4 area by MRI in July 1999, for which reduced her a-fetoprotein level thereafter (Fig. 1C). Patients 4 to 6
he received open liver biopsy followed by local microwave ablation started oral rifampicin 150 mg daily in the slim hope that it might
in October 1999. Resected liver specimens were histologically retard the development of HCC. Patients 5 and 6 received IFN-a
negative for HCC. Despite the very high expected recurrence rate before commencing rifampicin therapy, but soon discontinued
(26) and frequent episodes of hepatic encephalopathy, he was because of adverse effects. In June 2006, 10 years after the start of
totally free from HCC until he died suddenly in January 2002 rifampicin, patient 5 showed clear-cut evidence of HCCs in the S1
(Fig. 1A). Patient 2 has been followed since July 1992. Her a- and S8 portions, which were treated with transarterial embolization
fetoprotein level was normal until May 1998 when it started to followed by percutaneous radiofrequency catheter ablation.
increase sharply. She was prescribed oral rifampicin, 150 mg daily, Surprisingly, as of March 2008, this is the only HCC that developed
in October 1998, but her a-fetoprotein continued to increase, in the six patients during the entire rifampicin therapy period of
reaching a peak value of 113 ng/mL in August 1999. This increase 97.3 F 29.1 (mean F SD) months. Rifampicin induced neither an
led her physician (Y.T.) to increase the rifampicin dose to 300 mg adverse reaction nor HCV RNA negativity.
daily, which reduced her a-fetoprotein level to 26.4 ng/mL in Inhibition of in vivo cancer progression by oral rifampicin.
March 2000. Her a-fetoprotein never showed a substantial increase To explore the reasons for such an unexpectedly low occurrence of
thereafter, even after rifampicin was decreased to 150 mg daily HCC, which followed long-term, oral rifampicin therapy in the
high-risk liver cirrhosis patients, we first studied the effect of oral cells. Rifampicin suppressed FBS-stimulated proliferation of
rifampicin on cancer progression in well-established mouse exponentially growing hMVECs (Supplementary Fig. S1A) and
xenograft models implanted s.c. with human colon cancer (CW-2) hRECs (Supplementary Fig. S1B). The effects were concentration
cells. BALB/c Slc-nu mice receiving rifampicin in their drinking and time dependent and also observed to a lesser degree in rPECs
water ingested 0.68 F 0.01 mg rifampicin/d (34.0 F 0.9 mg/kg/d) (Supplementary Fig. S1C). 3-Formyl rifamycin SV also exerted an
and showed a significantly reduced rate of tumor growth compared antiproliferative effect on hMVECs, hRECs, and rPECs (Supple-
with those receiving control 0.25% DMSO/ddH2O (Fig. 2A). Mice mentary Fig. S1D–F). However, rifamycin SV showed significant
receiving rifampicin for 4 weeks showed a mean tumor growth cytotoxic effects on the three types of endothelial cells (Supple-
volume 48% less than the control group (P < 0.05). We next mentary Fig. S1G–I). The inhibitory effects of rifampicin on VEGF-
implanted Lewis lung carcinoma (LL/2) cells subcutaneously in induced proliferation in quiescent hUVECs were also concentration
BALB/c AnNCrj-nu/nu mice (27). The mice that were orally given dependent (25–100 Ag/mL), but not as potent as in growing
either rifampicin, rifamycin SV, or 3-formyl rifamycin SV via a endothelial cells (IC50 f60 Ag/mL).
gastric tube (40 mg/kg/d) showed a significantly slower tumor We determined the antiproliferative effect of rifampicin on
growth rate (P < 0.05f0.01; Fig. 2B) and reduced metastatic areas human cancer-derived cells and compared their effects with
spectrum of suppression was almost identical to that of rifampicin. never achieved sustained HCV negativity; and three patients
Similar results were obtained with rPECs, rAECs, and hUVECs. discontinued IFN due to adverse reactions. Second, they were
These results showed that rifampicin and two rifamycins potently relatively old, at 62.0 F 5.2 years, at the start of rifampicin therapy.
down-regulate proangiogenic gene expression in a variety of Third, they had high serum alanine aminotransferase levels before
endothelial cells, comparable to the effects of endostatin (8). rifampicin therapy (38). Fourth, patients 1 to 3 showed increasing
a-fetoprotein levels when rifampicin was started (39). Patient 1,
who had the highest risk for HCC because of relapsing episodes,
Discussion developed HCC shortly after discontinuation of rifampicin in 1995,
HCV-related liver cirrhosis is a major risk factor for development but HCC never recurred after restarting rifampicin. Because a-
of HCC, with an annual incidence reaching 7.9% in an untreated, fetoprotein can either be produced by HCC itself or by regenerating
biopsy-proven population (24, 35). Even after initial treatment, hepatic tissues after significant hepatic injury, its marked decrease
second HCCs develop at new foci in f30% of patients within the suggests either reduction of HCC, undetectable by ultrasound or
first year, leading to a poor prognosis (26). IFN treatment can MRI, or suppression of hepatic injury and subsequent regeneration.
inhibit HCC in patients with moderate liver fibrosis, but only Whatever the mechanisms, large-scale prospective trials should be
Figure 5. Rifampicin and rifamycins down-regulate growth-, migration-, and angiogenesis-associated genes. hMVECs grown exponentially in 20% FBS and growth
supplements were incubated with the indicated concentrations of rifampicin (A), 3-formyl rifamycin SV (B), or rifamycin SV (B) for 4 h and the indicated mRNA
levels were determined by real-time quantitative RT-PCR. Columns, mean percentage of the level in untreated cells from four repeated experiments; bars, SE.
angiogenesis-related genes (40) in both human and rat endothelial administration (49). Peak plasma rifampicin after single oral doses
cells; the time course and potency, as well as the spectrum of gene of 150 and 300 mg are as high as 2 and 3.5 Ag/mL, respectively, in
suppression, are comparable to those previously observed with normal subjects, whereas hepatic bile and urine levels easily exceed
endostatin (9). There is general agreement that endostatin inhibits 100 Ag/mL (49). Even at 12 hours after an oral dose of 150 mg,
cultured endothelial cell migration, but it is less clear whether hepatic bile concentrations of rifampicin and its metabolite still
endostatin also affects endothelial cell apoptosis and proliferation remain at 100 Ag/mL in normal subjects. In liver cirrhosis, serum
(2, 9, 41–46). In our in vitro study using the same protocol as and biliary levels are further elevated and mean half-life is
our previous endostatin study (9), the antiproliferative effects of prolonged because its bile excretion reaches saturation, resulting
40 Ag/mL rifampicin and 3-formyl rifamycin SV on microvascular in very constant, high levels (50). Such clinical pharmacokinetics of
endothelial cells were clearly greater than those seen with the rifampicin explain the remarkable effect of low-dose, once daily,
treatment dose of endostatin. An antimigratory effect was also oral rifampicin on suppressing HCC in liver cirrhosis and provide a
evident, but this was not as marked as the antiproliferative effect. reasonable rationale for its use as an antiangiogenic agent targeting
These results show the antiangiogenic properties of rifampicin and the hepatobiliary system. Moreover, our results show that, at
3-formyl rifamycin SV and the potential utility of oral rifampicin as concentrations >100 Ag/mL, rifampicin could exert its direct
References 4. Kerbel RS, Kamen BA. The anti-angiogenic basis of signaling pathway for CYP3A induction. Proc Natl Acad
metronomic chemotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2004;4: Sci U S A 1998;95:12208–13.
1. Carmeliet P. Angiogenesis in health and disease. Nat 423–36. 7. Bachs L, Pares A, Elena M, Piera C, Rodes J. Comparison
Med 2003;9:653–60. 5. Folkman J. Antiangiogenesis in cancer therapy-endo- of rifampicin with phenobarbitone for treatment of
2. Kerbel R, Folkman J. Clinical translation of angiogen- statin and its mechanisms of action. Exp Cell Res 2006; pruritus in biliary cirrhosis. Lancet 1989;1:574–6.
esis inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:727–39. 312:594–607. 8. Abdollahi A, Hahnfeldt P, Maercker C, et al. Endo-
3. Carmeliet P. Angiogenesis in life, disease and medi- 6. Bertilsson G, Heidrich J, Svensson K, et al. Identifica- statin’s antiangiogenic signaling network. Mol Cell 2004;
cine. Nature 2005;438:932–6. tion of a human nuclear receptor defines a new 13:649–63.
9. Shichiri M, Hirata Y. Antiangiogenesis signals by 23. Shichiri M, Yoshinaga K, Hisatomi H, Sugihara K, 36. Niederau C, Lange S, Heintges T, et al. Prognosis of
endostatin. FASEB J 2001;15:1044–53. Hirata Y. Genetic and epigenetic inactivation of chronic hepatitis C: results of a large, prospective cohort
10. Kozlowski JM, Fidler IJ, Campbell D, Xu ZL, Kaighn mitotic checkpoint genes hBUB1 and hBUBR1 and study. Hepatology 1998;28:1687–95.
ME, Hart IR. Metastatic behavior of human tumor cell their relationship to survival. Cancer Res 2002;62: 37. Valla DC, Chevallier M, Marcellin P, et al. Treatment
lines grown in the nude mouse. Cancer Res 1984;44: 13–7. of hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis: a randomized,
3522–9. 24. Yoshida H, Shiratori Y, Moriyama M, et al. controlled trial of interferon a-2b versus no treatment.
11. Oikawa T, Sasaki M, Inose M, et al. Effects of Interferon therapy reduces the risk for hepatocellular Hepatology 1999;29:1870–5.
cytogenin, a novel microbial product, on embryonic and carcinoma: national surveillance program of cirrhotic 38. Tarao K, Rino Y, Ohkawa S, et al. Association between
tumor cell-induced angiogenic responses in vivo . and noncirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C in high serum alanine aminotransferase levels and more
Anticancer Res 1997;17:1881–6. Japan. IHIT Study Group. Inhibition of hepatocarcino- rapid development and higher rate of incidence of
12. Prouty SM, Hanson KD, Boyle AL, et al. A cell culture genesis by interferon therapy. Ann Intern Med 1999; hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C
model system for genetic analyses of the cell cycle by 131:174–81. virus-associated cirrhosis. Cancer 1999;86:589–95.
targeted homologous recombination. Oncogene 1993;8: 25. Hayashi N, Takehara T. Antiviral therapy for chronic 39. Gebo KA, Chander G, Jenckes MW, et al. Screening
899–907. hepatitis C: past, present, and future. J Gastroenterol tests for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with
13. Shichiri M, Ishimaru S, Ota T, Nishikawa T, Isogai T, 2006;41:17–27. chronic hepatitis C: a systematic review. Hepatology
Hirata Y. Salusins: newly identified bioactive peptides 26. Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Tanaka E, et al. Risk 2002;36:S84–92.
with hemodynamic and mitogenic activities. Nat Med factors contributing to early and late phase intrahepatic 40. Brooks PC, Clark RA, Cheresh DA. Requirement of
2003;9:1166–72. recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatec- vascular integrin avh3 for angiogenesis. Science 1994;
14. Fukai N, Shichiri M, Ozawa N, Matsushita M, Hirata tomy. J Hepatol 2003;38:200–7. 264:569–71.
Y. Coexpression of calcitonin receptor-like receptor and 27. O’Reilly MS, Boehm T, Shing Y, et al. Endostatin: an 41. Blezinger P, Wang J, Gondo M, et al. Systemic