Mercury is the first planet from the Sun and the smallest in the Solar System.

It is a terrestrial
planet with a heavily cratered surface due to overlapping impact events. These features are well
preserved since the planet has no geological activity and an extremely tenuous atmosphere called
an exosphere. Despite being the smallest planet in the Solar System with a mean diameter of
4,880 km (3,030 mi), 38% of that of Earth, Mercury is dense enough to have roughly the same
surface gravity as Mars. Mercury has a dynamic magnetic field with a strength about 1% of that of
Earth's and has no natural satellites.
According to current models, Mercury may have a solid silicate crust and mantle overlying a solid
outer core, a deeper liquid core layer, and a solid inner core. Having almost no atmosphere to retain
heat, Mercury has surface temperatures that change wildly during the day, ranging from 100 K
(−173 °C; −280 °F) at night to 700 K (427 °C; 800 °F) during sunlight across the equator regions.
[19]
At Mercury's poles there are large reservoirs of water ices that are never exposed to direct
sunlight, which has an estimated mass of about 0.025–0.25% the Antarctic ice sheet.[20] There are
many competing hypotheses about Mercury's origins and development, some of which incorporate
collision with planetesimal and rock vaporization.
Because Mercury is very close to the Sun, the intensity of sunlight on its surface is between 4.59
and 10.61 times the Sun's typical energy received by the Earth: the solar constant. Mercury orbits
the Sun in a 3:2 spin–orbit resonance, meaning that relative to the background stars, it rotates on its
axis exactly three times for every two revolutions it makes around the Sun.[a][21] Counterintuitively, due
to Mercury's slow rotation, an observer on the planet would see only one Mercurian solar day (176
Earth days) every two Mercurian solar years (88 Earth days each).[4] Mercury's axis has the
smallest tilt of any of the Solar System's planets, about 1⁄30 of a degree, and its orbital eccentricity is
the largest of all known planets in the Solar System.[b]
Like Venus, Mercury orbits the Sun within Earth's orbit, making it appear in Earth's sky only as a
"morning star" or "evening star" that is relatively close to the Sun. In English, it is named after the
Roman god Mercurius (Mercury), god of commerce, communication and the messenger of gods.
Mercury is the most difficult planet to reach from Earth because it requires the greatest change in a
spacecraft's velocity. Only three spacecraft have visited Mercury as of 2023: Mariner 10 flew by in
1974 and 1975; MESSENGER, launched in 2004, flew by Mercury first in 2008 and orbited it over
4,000 times between 2011 and 2015; the BepiColombo spacecraft flew by Mercury first in 2021, and
it is scheduled to make its final arrival at Mercury in 2025, where it will then insert two orbiters.

Nomenclature
The ancients knew Mercury by different names depending on whether it was an evening star or a
morning star. By about 350 BC, the ancient Greeks had realized the two stars were one.[22] They
knew the planet as Στίλβων Stilbōn, meaning "twinkling", and Ἑρμής Hermēs, for its fleeting motion,
[23]
a name that is retained in modern Greek (Ερμής Ermis).[24] The Romans named the planet after
the swift-footed Roman messenger god, Mercury (Latin Mercurius), whom they equated with the
Greek Hermes, because it moves across the sky faster than any other planet.[22][25] The astronomical
symbol for Mercury is a stylized version of Hermes' caduceus; a Christian cross was added in the
16th century: .[26][27]

Physical characteristics
Mercury is one of four terrestrial planets in the Solar System, which means it is a rocky body like
Earth. It is the smallest planet in the Solar System, with an equatorial radius of 2,439.7 kilometres
(1,516.0 mi).[4] Mercury is also smaller—albeit more massive—than the largest natural satellites in
the Solar System, Ganymede and Titan. Mercury consists of approximately 70% metallic and
30% silicate material.[28]
Internal structure

Mercury's internal structure and magnetic

field
Mercury appears to have a solid silicate crust and mantle overlying a solid, metallic outer core layer,
a deeper liquid core layer, and a solid inner core.[29][30] The composition of the iron-rich core remains
uncertain, but it likely contains nickel, silicon and perhaps sulfur and carbon, plus trace amounts of
other elements.[31] The planet's density is the second highest in the Solar System at 5.427 g/cm3, only
slightly less than Earth's density of 5.515 g/cm3.[4] If the effect of gravitational compression were to be
factored out from both planets, the materials of which Mercury is made would be denser than those
of Earth, with an uncompressed density of 5.3 g/cm3 versus Earth's 4.4 g/cm3.[32] Mercury's density
can be used to infer details of its inner structure. Although Earth's high density results appreciably
from gravitational compression, particularly at the core, Mercury is much smaller and its inner
regions are not as compressed. Therefore, for it to have such a high density, its core must be large
and rich in iron.[33]
The radius of Mercury's core is estimated to be 2,020 ± 30 km (1,255 ± 19 mi), based on interior
models constrained to be consistent with a moment of inertia factor of 0.346±0.014.[9][34] Hence,
Mercury's core occupies about 57% of its volume; for Earth this proportion is 17%. Research
published in 2007 suggests that Mercury has a molten core.[35][36] The mantle-crust layer is in total
420 km (260 mi) thick.[37] Based on data from the Mariner 10 and MESSENGER missions, in addition
to Earth-based observation, Mercury's crust is estimated to be 35 km (22 mi) thick.[38][39] However, this
model may be an overestimate and the crust could be 26 ± 11 km (16.2 ± 6.8 mi) thick based on an
Airy isostacy model.[40] One distinctive feature of Mercury's surface is the presence of numerous
narrow ridges, extending up to several hundred kilometers in length. It is thought that these were
formed as Mercury's core and mantle cooled and contracted at a time when the crust had already
solidified.[41][42][43]
Mercury's core has a higher iron content than that of any other planet in the Solar System, and
several theories have been proposed to explain this. The most widely accepted theory is that
Mercury originally had a metal–silicate ratio similar to common chondrite meteorites, thought to be
typical of the Solar System's rocky matter, and a mass approximately 2.25 times its current mass.
[44]
Early in the Solar System's history, Mercury may have been struck by a planetesimal of
approximately 1⁄6 Mercury's mass and several thousand kilometers across.[44] The impact would have
stripped away much of the original crust and mantle, leaving the core behind as a relatively major
component.[44] A similar process, known as the giant impact hypothesis, has been proposed to
explain the formation of Earth's Moon.[44]
Alternatively, Mercury may have formed from the solar nebula before the Sun's energy output had
stabilized. It would initially have had twice its present mass, but as the protosun contracted,
temperatures near Mercury could have been between 2,500 and 3,500 K and possibly even as high
as 10,000 K.[45] Much of Mercury's surface rock could have been vaporized at such temperatures,
forming an atmosphere of "rock vapor" that could have been carried away by the solar wind.[45] A third
hypothesis proposes that the solar nebula caused drag on the particles from which Mercury
was accreting, which meant that lighter particles were lost from the accreting material and not
gathered by Mercury.[46]
Each hypothesis predicts a different surface composition, and two space missions have been tasked
with making observations of this composition. The first MESSENGER, which ended in 2015, found
higher-than-expected potassium and sulfur levels on the surface, suggesting that the giant impact
hypothesis and vaporization of the crust and mantle did not occur because said potassium and sulfur
would have been driven off by the extreme heat of these events.[47] BepiColombo, which will arrive at
Mercury in 2025, will make observations to test these hypotheses.[48] The findings so far would seem
to favor the third hypothesis; however, further analysis of the data is needed.[49]

Surface geology
Main article: Geology of Mercury
Mercury's surface is similar in appearance to that of the Moon, showing extensive mare-like plains
and heavy cratering, indicating that it has been geologically inactive for billions of years. It is
more heterogeneous than the surface of Mars or the Moon, both of which contain significant
stretches of similar geology, such as maria and plateaus.[50] Albedo features are areas of markedly
different reflectivity, which include impact craters, the resulting ejecta, and ray systems. Larger
albedo features correspond to higher reflectivity plains.[51] Mercury has "wrinkle-ridges" (dorsa),
Moon-like highlands, mountains (montes), plains (planitiae), escarpments (rupes), and valleys
(valles).[52][53]

MASCS spectrum scan of Mercury's surface by MESSENGER

The planet's mantle is chemically heterogeneous, suggesting the planet went through a magma
ocean phase early in its history. Crystallization of minerals and convective overturn resulted in a
layered, chemically heterogeneous crust with large-scale variations in chemical composition
observed on the surface. The crust is low in iron but high in sulfur, resulting from the stronger
early chemically reducing conditions than is found on other terrestrial planets. The surface is
dominated by iron-poor pyroxene and olivine, as represented by enstatite and forsterite,
respectively, along with sodium-rich plagioclase and minerals of mixed magnesium, calcium, and
iron-sulfide. The less reflective regions of the crust are high in carbon, most likely in the form of
graphite.[54][55]
Names for features on Mercury come from a variety of sources and are set according to
the IAU planetary nomenclature system. Names coming from people are limited to the deceased.
Craters are named for artists, musicians, painters, and authors who have made outstanding or
fundamental contributions to their field. Ridges, or dorsa, are named for scientists who have
contributed to the study of Mercury. Depressions or fossae are named for works of architecture.
Montes are named for the word "hot" in a variety of languages. Plains or planitiae are named
for Mercury in various languages. Escarpments or rupēs are named for ships of scientific
expeditions. Valleys or valles are named for abandoned cities, towns, or settlements of antiquity.[56]
Impact basins and craters

Enhanced-color image of craters Munch (left), Sander (center),

and Poe (right) amid volcanic plains (orange) near Caloris Basin
Mercury was heavily bombarded by comets and asteroids during and shortly following its formation
4.6 billion years ago, as well as during a possibly separate subsequent episode called the Late
Heavy Bombardment that ended 3.8 billion years ago.[57] Mercury received impacts over its entire
surface during this period of intense crater formation,[53] facilitated by the lack of any atmosphere to
slow impactors down.[58] During this time Mercury was volcanically active; basins were filled
by magma, producing smooth plains similar to the maria found on the Moon.[59][60] One of the most
unusual craters is Apollodorus, or "the Spider", which hosts a serious of radiating troughs extending
outwards from its impact site.[61]
Craters on Mercury range in diameter from small bowl-shaped cavities to multi-ringed impact
basins hundreds of kilometers across. They appear in all states of degradation, from relatively fresh
rayed craters to highly degraded crater remnants. Mercurian craters differ subtly from lunar craters in
that the area blanketed by their ejecta is much smaller, a consequence of Mercury's stronger surface
gravity.[62] According to International Astronomical Union rules, each new crater must be named after
an artist who was famous for more than fifty years, and dead for more than three years, before the
date the crater is named.[63]

Overhead view of Caloris Basin

Perspective view of Caloris Basin – high (red); low (blue)

The largest known crater is Caloris Planitia, or Caloris Basin, with a diameter of 1,550 km (960 mi).
[64]
The impact that created the Caloris Basin was so powerful that it caused lava eruptions and left a
concentric mountainous ring ~2 km (1.2 mi) tall surrounding the impact crater. The floor of the
Caloris Basin is filled by a geologically distinct flat plain, broken up by ridges and fractures in a
roughly polygonal pattern. It is not clear whether they were volcanic lava flows induced by the impact
or a large sheet of impact melt.[62]
At the antipode of the Caloris Basin is a large region of unusual, hilly terrain known as the "Weird
Terrain". One hypothesis for its origin is that shock waves generated during the Caloris impact
traveled around Mercury, converging at the basin's antipode (180 degrees away). The resulting high
stresses fractured the surface.[65] Alternatively, it has been suggested that this terrain formed as a
result of the convergence of ejecta at this basin's antipode.[66]

Tolstoj basin is along the bottom of this image of Mercury's

limb
Overall, 46 impact basins have been identified.[67] A notable basin is the 400 km (250 mi)-wide, multi-
ring Tolstoj Basin that has an ejecta blanket extending up to 500 km (310 mi) from its rim and a floor
that has been filled by smooth plains materials. Beethoven Basin has a similar-sized ejecta blanket
and a 625 km (388 mi)-diameter rim.[62] Like the Moon, the surface of Mercury has likely incurred the
effects of space weathering processes, including solar wind and micrometeorite impacts.[68]
Plains
There are two geologically distinct plains regions on Mercury.[62][69] Gently rolling, hilly plains in the
regions between craters are Mercury's oldest visible surfaces,[62] predating the heavily cratered
terrain. These inter-crater plains appear to have obliterated many earlier craters, and show a general
paucity of smaller craters below about 30 km (19 mi) in diameter.[69]
Smooth plains are widespread flat areas that fill depressions of various sizes and bear a strong
resemblance to lunar maria. Unlike lunar maria, the smooth plains of Mercury have the same albedo
as the older inter-crater plains. Despite a lack of unequivocally volcanic characteristics, the
localisation and rounded, lobate shape of these plains strongly support volcanic origins.[62] All the
smooth plains of Mercury formed significantly later than the Caloris basin, as evidenced by
appreciably smaller crater densities than on the Caloris ejecta blanket.[62]
Compressional features
An unusual feature of Mercury's surface is the numerous compression folds, or rupes, that crisscross
the plains. These exist on the moon, but are much more prominent on Mercury.[70] As Mercury's
interior cooled, it contracted and its surface began to deform, creating wrinkle ridges and lobate
scarps associated with thrust faults. The scarps can reach lengths of 1,000 km (620 mi) and heights
of 3 km (1.9 mi).[71] These compressional features can be seen on top of other features, such as
craters and smooth plains, indicating they are more recent.[72] Mapping of the features has suggested
a total shrinkage of Mercury's radius in the range of ~1–7 km (0.62–4.35 mi).[73] Most activity along
the major thrust systems probably ended about 3.6–3.7 billion years ago.[74] Small-scale thrust fault
scarps have been found, tens of meters in height and with lengths in the range of a few kilometers,
that appear to be less than 50 million years old, indicating that compression of the interior and
consequent surface geological activity continue to the present.[71][73]
Volcanism

Picasso crater — the large arc-shaped pit located on the

eastern side of its floor are postulated to have formed when subsurface magma subsided or
drained, causing the surface to collapse into the resulting void.
There is evidence for pyroclastic flows on Mercury from low-profile shield volcanoes.[75][76][77] Fifty-one
pyroclastic deposits have been identified,[78] where 90% of them are found within impact craters.[78] A
study of the degradation state of the impact craters that host pyroclastic deposits suggests that
pyroclastic activity occurred on Mercury over a prolonged interval.[78]
A "rimless depression" inside the southwest rim of the Caloris Basin consists of at least nine
overlapping volcanic vents, each individually up to 8 km (5.0 mi) in diameter. It is thus a "compound
volcano".[79] The vent floors are at least 1 km (0.62 mi) below their brinks and they bear a closer
resemblance to volcanic craters sculpted by explosive eruptions or modified by collapse into void
spaces created by magma withdrawal back down into a conduit.[79] Scientists could not quantify the
age of the volcanic complex system but reported that it could be on the order of a billion years.[79]

Surface conditions and exosphere

Main article: Atmosphere of Mercury

Composite of the north pole of Mercury, where NASA

confirmed the discovery of a large volume of water ice, in permanently dark craters that are
found there. [80]

The surface temperature of Mercury ranges from 100 to 700 K (−173 to 427 °C; −280 to 800 °F).[19] It
never rises above 180 K at the poles,[14] due to the absence of an atmosphere and a steep
temperature gradient between the equator and the poles. At perihelion, the equatorial subsolar
point is located at latitude 0°W or 180°W, and it climbs to a temperature of about 700 K.
During aphelion, this occurs at 90° or 270°W, and reaches only 550 K.[81] On the dark side of the
planet, temperatures average 110 K.[14][82] The intensity of sunlight on Mercury's surface ranges
between 4.59 and 10.61 times the solar constant (1,370 W·m−2).[83]
Although daylight temperatures at the surface of Mercury are generally extremely high, observations
strongly suggest that ice (frozen water) exists on Mercury. The floors of deep craters at the poles are
never exposed to direct sunlight, and temperatures there remain below 102 K, far lower than the
global average.[84] This creates a cold trap where ice can accumulate. Water ice strongly
reflects radar, and observations by the 70-meter Goldstone Solar System Radar and the VLA in the
early 1990s revealed that there are patches of high radar reflection near the poles.[85] Although ice
was not the only possible cause of these reflective regions, astronomers think it was the most likely.
[86]
The presence of water ice was confirmed using MESSENGER images of craters at the north pole.
[80]

The icy crater regions are estimated to contain about 1014–1015 kg of ice,[20] and may be covered by a
layer of regolith that inhibits sublimation.[87] By comparison, the Antarctic ice sheet on Earth has a
mass of about 4×1018 kg, and Mars's south polar cap contains about 1016 kg of water.[20] The origin of
the ice on Mercury is not yet known, but the two most likely sources are from outgassing of water
from the planet's interior and deposition by impacts of comets.[20]
Mercury is too small and hot for its gravity to retain any significant atmosphere over long periods of
time; it does have a tenuous surface-bounded exosphere[88] at a surface pressure of less than
approximately 0.5 nPa (0.005 picobars).[4] It
includes hydrogen, helium, oxygen, sodium, calcium, potassium, magnesium, silicon, and hydroxide,
among others.[17][18] This exosphere is not stable—atoms are continuously lost and replenished from a
variety of sources. Hydrogen atoms and helium atoms probably come from the solar
wind, diffusing into Mercury's magnetosphere before later escaping back into space. Radioactive
decay of elements within Mercury's crust is another source of helium, as well as sodium and
potassium. Water vapor is present, released by a combination of processes such as: comets striking
its surface, sputtering creating water out of hydrogen from the solar wind and oxygen from rock, and
sublimation from reservoirs of water ice in the permanently shadowed polar craters. The detection of
high amounts of water-related ions like O+, OH−, and H3O+ was a surprise.[89][90] Because of the
quantities of these ions that were detected in Mercury's space environment, scientists surmise that
these molecules were blasted from the surface or exosphere by the solar wind.[91][92]
Sodium, potassium and calcium were discovered in the atmosphere during the 1980s–1990s, and
are thought to result primarily from the vaporization of surface rock struck by micrometeorite
impacts[93] including presently from Comet Encke.[94] In 2008, magnesium was discovered
by MESSENGER.[95] Studies indicate that, at times, sodium emissions are localized at points that
correspond to the planet's magnetic poles. This would indicate an interaction between the
magnetosphere and the planet's surface.[96]
According to NASA, Mercury is not a suitable planet for Earth-like life. It has a surface boundary
exosphere instead of a layered atmosphere, extreme temperatures, and high solar radiation. It is
unlikely that any living beings can withstand those conditions.[97] Some parts of the subsurface of
Mercury may have been habitable, and perhaps life forms, albeit likely primitive microorganisms,
may have existed on the planet.[98][99][100]

Magnetic field and magnetosphere

Main article: Mercury's magnetic field
 Graph showing relative strength of Mercury's magnetic field
Despite its small size and slow 59-day-long rotation, Mercury has a significant, and apparently
global, magnetic field. According to measurements taken by Mariner 10, it is about 1.1% the strength
of Earth's. The magnetic-field strength at Mercury's equator is about 300 nT.[101][102] Like that of Earth,
Mercury's magnetic field is dipolar.[96] Unlike Earth's, Mercury's poles are nearly aligned with the
planet's spin axis.[103] Measurements from both the Mariner 10 and MESSENGER space probes have
indicated that the strength and shape of the magnetic field are stable.[103]
It is likely that this magnetic field is generated by a dynamo effect, in a manner similar to the
magnetic field of Earth.[104][105] This dynamo effect would result from the circulation of the planet's iron-
rich liquid core. Particularly strong tidal heating effects caused by the planet's high orbital eccentricity
would serve to keep part of the core in the liquid state necessary for this dynamo effect.[106][107]
Mercury's magnetic field is strong enough to deflect the solar wind around the planet, creating a
magnetosphere. The planet's magnetosphere, though small enough to fit within Earth,[96] is strong
enough to trap solar wind plasma. This contributes to the space weathering of the planet's surface.
[103]
Observations taken by the Mariner 10 spacecraft detected this low energy plasma in the
magnetosphere of the planet's nightside. Bursts of energetic particles in the planet's magnetotail
indicate a dynamic quality to the planet's magnetosphere.[96]
During its second flyby of the planet on October 6, 2008, MESSENGER discovered that Mercury's
magnetic field can be extremely "leaky". The spacecraft encountered magnetic "tornadoes" – twisted
bundles of magnetic fields connecting the planetary magnetic field to interplanetary space – that
were up to 800 km wide or a third of the radius of the planet. These twisted magnetic flux tubes,
technically known as flux transfer events, form open windows in the planet's magnetic shield through
which the solar wind may enter and directly impact Mercury's surface via magnetic
reconnection[108] This also occurs in Earth's magnetic field. The MESSENGER observations showed
the reconnection rate was ten times higher at Mercury, but its proximity to the Sun only accounts for
about a third of the reconnection rate observed by MESSENGER.[108]

Orbit, rotation, and longitude

Orbit of Mercury (2006)

Animation of Mercury's and Earth's revolution around the Sun

Mercury has the most eccentric orbit of all the planets in the Solar System; its eccentricity is 0.21
with its distance from the Sun ranging from 46,000,000 to 70,000,000 km (29,000,000 to
43,000,000 mi). It takes 87.969 Earth days to complete an orbit. The diagram illustrates the effects
of the eccentricity, showing Mercury's orbit overlaid with a circular orbit having the same semi-major
axis. Mercury's higher velocity when it is near perihelion is clear from the greater distance it covers in
each 5-day interval. In the diagram, the varying distance of Mercury to the Sun is represented by the
size of the planet, which is inversely proportional to Mercury's distance from the Sun. This varying
distance to the Sun leads to Mercury's surface being flexed by tidal bulges raised by the Sun that are
about 17 times stronger than the Moon's on Earth.[109] Combined with a 3:2 spin–orbit resonance of
the planet's rotation around its axis, it also results in complex variations of the surface temperature.
[28]
The resonance makes a single solar day (the length between two meridian transits of the Sun) on
Mercury last exactly two Mercury years, or about 176 Earth days.[110]
Mercury's orbit is inclined by 7 degrees to the plane of Earth's orbit (the ecliptic), the largest of all
eight known solar planets.[111] As a result, transits of Mercury across the face of the Sun can only
occur when the planet is crossing the plane of the ecliptic at the time it lies between Earth and the
Sun, which is in May or November. This occurs about every seven years on average.[112]
Mercury's axial tilt is almost zero,[113] with the best measured value as low as 0.027 degrees.[114] This is
significantly smaller than that of Jupiter, which has the second smallest axial tilt of all planets at 3.1
degrees. This means that to an observer at Mercury's poles, the center of the Sun never rises more
than 2.1 arcminutes above the horizon.[114] By comparison, the angular size of the Sun as seen from
Mercury ranges from 1+1⁄4 to 2 degrees across.[115]
At certain points on Mercury's surface, an observer would be able to see the Sun peek up a little
more than two-thirds of the way over the horizon, then reverse and set before rising again, all within
the same Mercurian day.[c] This is because approximately four Earth days before perihelion,
Mercury's angular orbital velocity equals its angular rotational velocity so that the Sun's apparent
motion ceases; closer to perihelion, Mercury's angular orbital velocity then exceeds the angular
rotational velocity. Thus, to a hypothetical observer on Mercury, the Sun appears to move in
a retrograde direction. Four Earth days after perihelion, the Sun's normal apparent motion resumes.
[28]
A similar effect would have occurred if Mercury had been in synchronous rotation: the alternating
gain and loss of rotation over a revolution would have caused a libration of 23.65° in longitude.[116]
For the same reason, there are two points on Mercury's equator, 180 degrees apart in longitude, at
either of which, around perihelion in alternate Mercurian years (once a Mercurian day), the Sun
passes overhead, then reverses its apparent motion and passes overhead again, then reverses a
second time and passes overhead a third time, taking a total of about 16 Earth-days for this entire
process. In the other alternate Mercurian years, the same thing happens at the other of these two
points. The amplitude of the retrograde motion is small, so the overall effect is that, for two or three
weeks, the Sun is almost stationary overhead, and is at its most brilliant because Mercury is at
perihelion, its closest to the Sun. This prolonged exposure to the Sun at its brightest makes these
two points the hottest places on Mercury. Maximum temperature occurs when the Sun is at an angle
of about 25 degrees past noon due to diurnal temperature lag, at 0.4 Mercury days and 0.8 Mercury
years past sunrise.[117] Conversely, there are two other points on the equator, 90 degrees of longitude
apart from the first ones, where the Sun passes overhead only when the planet is at aphelion in
alternate years, when the apparent motion of the Sun in Mercury's sky is relatively rapid. These
points, which are the ones on the equator where the apparent retrograde motion of the Sun happens
when it is crossing the horizon as described in the preceding paragraph, receive much less solar
heat than the first ones described above.[118]
Mercury attains an inferior conjunction (nearest approach to Earth) every 116 Earth days on
average,[4] but this interval can range from 105 days to 129 days due to the planet's eccentric orbit.
Mercury can come as near as 82,200,000 km (0.549 astronomical units; 51.1 million miles) to Earth,
and that is slowly declining: The next approach to within 82,100,000 km (51 million mi) is in 2679,
and to within 82,000,000 km (51 million mi) in 4487, but it will not be closer to Earth than
80,000,000 km (50 million mi) until 28,622.[119] Its period of retrograde motion as seen from Earth can
vary from 8 to 15 days on either side of an inferior conjunction. This large range arises from the
planet's high orbital eccentricity.[28] Essentially, because Mercury is closest to the Sun, when taking
an average over time, Mercury is most often the closest planet to the Earth,[120][121] and—in that
measure—it is the closest planet to each of the other planets in the Solar System.[122][123][124][d]

Longitude convention
The longitude convention for Mercury puts the zero of longitude at one of the two hottest points on
the surface, as described above. However, when this area was first visited, by Mariner 10, this zero
meridian was in darkness, so it was impossible to select a feature on the surface to define the exact
position of the meridian. Therefore, a small crater further west was chosen, called Hun Kal, which
provides the exact reference point for measuring longitude.[125][126] The center of Hun Kal defines the
20° west meridian. A 1970 International Astronomical Union resolution suggests that longitudes be
measured positively in the westerly direction on Mercury.[127] The two hottest places on the equator
are therefore at longitudes 0° W and 180° W, and the coolest points on the equator are at longitudes
90° W and 270° W. However, the MESSENGER project uses an east-positive convention.[128]

Spin-orbit resonance

After one orbit, Mercury has rotated 1.5 times, so after two
complete orbits the same hemisphere is again illuminated.
For many years it was thought that Mercury was synchronously tidally locked with the
Sun, rotating once for each orbit and always keeping the same face directed towards the Sun, in the
same way that the same side of the Moon always faces Earth. Radar observations in 1965 proved
that the planet has a 3:2 spin-orbit resonance, rotating three times for every two revolutions around
the Sun. The eccentricity of Mercury's orbit makes this resonance stable—at perihelion, when the
solar tide is strongest, the Sun is nearly stationary in Mercury's sky.[129]
The 3:2 resonant tidal locking is stabilized by the variance of the tidal force along Mercury's eccentric
orbit, acting on a permanent dipole component of Mercury's mass distribution.[130] In a circular orbit
there is no such variance, so the only resonance stabilized in such an orbit is at 1:1 (e.g., Earth–
Moon), when the tidal force, stretching a body along the "center-body" line, exerts a torque that
aligns the body's axis of least inertia (the "longest" axis, and the axis of the aforementioned dipole)
to always point at the center. However, with noticeable eccentricity, like that of Mercury's orbit, the
tidal force has a maximum at perihelion and therefore stabilizes resonances, like 3:2, ensuring that
the planet points its axis of least inertia roughly at the Sun when passing through perihelion.[130]
The original reason astronomers thought it was synchronously locked was that, whenever Mercury
was best placed for observation, it was always nearly at the same point in its 3:2 resonance, hence
showing the same face. This is because, coincidentally, Mercury's rotation period is almost exactly
half of its synodic period with respect to Earth. Due to Mercury's 3:2 spin-orbit resonance, a solar
day lasts about 176 Earth days.[28] A sidereal day (the period of rotation) lasts about 58.7 Earth days.
[28]

Simulations indicate that the orbital eccentricity of Mercury varies chaotically from nearly zero
(circular) to more than 0.45 over millions of years due to perturbations from the other planets.[28]
[131]
This was thought to explain Mercury's 3:2 spin-orbit resonance (rather than the more usual 1:1),
because this state is more likely to arise during a period of high eccentricity.[132] However, accurate
modeling based on a realistic model of tidal response has demonstrated that Mercury was captured
into the 3:2 spin-orbit state at a very early stage of its history, within 20 (more likely, 10) million years
after its formation.[133]
Numerical simulations show that a future secular orbital resonant interaction with the perihelion of
Jupiter may cause the eccentricity of Mercury's orbit to increase to the point where there is a 1%
chance that the orbit will be destabilized in the next five billion years. If this happens, Mercury may
fall into the Sun, collide with Venus, be ejected from the Solar System, or even disrupt the rest of the
inner Solar System.[134][135]

Advance of perihelion
Main article: Perihelion precession of Mercury

Apsidal precession of Mercury's orbit

In 1859, the French mathematician and astronomer Urbain Le Verrier reported that the
slow precession of Mercury's orbit around the Sun could not be completely explained by Newtonian
mechanics and perturbations by the known planets. He suggested, among possible explanations,
that another planet (or perhaps instead a series of smaller "corpuscules") might exist in an orbit even
closer to the Sun than that of Mercury, to account for this perturbation.[136] (Other explanations
considered included a slight oblateness of the Sun.) The success of the search for Neptune based
on its perturbations of the orbit of Uranus led astronomers to place faith in this possible explanation,
and the hypothetical planet was named Vulcan, but no such planet was ever found.[137]
The observed perihelion precession of Mercury is 5,600 arcseconds (1.5556°) per century relative to
Earth, or 574.10±0.65 arcseconds per century[138] relative to the inertial ICRF. Newtonian mechanics,
taking into account all the effects from the other planets and including 0.0254 arcsecond per century
due to the oblateness of the Sun, predicts a precession of 5,557 arcseconds (1.5436°) per century
relative to Earth, or 531.63±0.69 arcseconds per century relative to ICRF.[138] In the early 20th
century, Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity provided the explanation for the observed
precession, by formalizing gravitation as being mediated by the curvature of spacetime. The effect is
small: just 42.980±0.001 arcseconds per century (or 0.43 arcsecond per year, or 0.1035 arcsecond
per orbital period) for Mercury; it therefore requires a little over 12.5 million orbits, or 3 million years,
for a full excess turn. Similar, but much smaller, effects exist for other Solar System bodies: 8.6247
arcseconds per century for Venus, 3.8387 for Earth, 1.351 for Mars, and 10.05 for 1566 Icarus.[139][140]

Observation

Image mosaic by Mariner 10, 1974

Mercury's apparent magnitude is calculated to vary between −2.48 (brighter than Sirius)
around superior conjunction and +7.25 (below the limit of naked-eye visibility) around inferior
conjunction.[15] The mean apparent magnitude is 0.23 while the standard deviation of 1.78 is the
largest of any planet. The mean apparent magnitude at superior conjunction is −1.89 while that at
inferior conjunction is +5.93.[15] Observation of Mercury is complicated by its proximity to the Sun, as
it is lost in the Sun's glare for much of the time. Mercury can be observed for only a brief period
during either morning or evening twilight.[141]
Ground-based telescope observations of Mercury reveal only an illuminated partial disk with limited
detail. The Hubble Space Telescope cannot observe Mercury at all, due to safety procedures that
prevent its pointing too close to the Sun.[142] Because the shift of 0.15 revolutions in a year makes up
a seven-year cycle (0.15 × 7 ≈ 1.0), in the seventh year, Mercury follows almost exactly (earlier by 7
days) the sequence of phenomena it showed seven years before.[143]
Like the Moon and Venus, Mercury exhibits phases as seen from Earth. It is "new" at inferior
conjunction and "full" at superior conjunction. The planet is rendered invisible from Earth on both of
these occasions because of its being obscured by the Sun,[141] except at its new phase during a
transit. Mercury is technically brightest as seen from Earth when it is at a full phase. Although
Mercury is farthest from Earth when it is full, the greater illuminated area that is visible and
the opposition brightness surge more than compensates for the distance.[144] The opposite is true for
Venus, which appears brightest when it is a crescent, because it is much closer to Earth than
when gibbous.[144][145]

False-color map showing the maximum temperatures of the

north polar region
Mercury is best observed at the first and last quarter, although they are phases of lesser brightness.
The first and last quarter phases occur at greatest elongation east and west of the Sun, respectively.
At both of these times, Mercury's separation from the Sun ranges anywhere from 17.9° at perihelion
to 27.8° at aphelion.[143][146] At greatest western elongation, Mercury rises at its earliest before sunrise,
and at greatest eastern elongation, it sets at its latest after sunset.[147]

False-color image of Carnegie Rupes, a tectonic landform—

high terrain (red); low (blue).
Mercury is more often and easily visible from the Southern Hemisphere than from the Northern. This
is because Mercury's maximum western elongation occurs only during early autumn in the Southern
Hemisphere, whereas its greatest eastern elongation happens only during late winter in the
Southern Hemisphere.[147] In both of these cases, the angle at which the planet's orbit intersects the
horizon is maximized, allowing it to rise several hours before sunrise in the former instance and not
set until several hours after sundown in the latter from southern mid-latitudes, such as Argentina and
South Africa.[147]
An alternate method for viewing Mercury involves observing the planet with a telescope during
daylight hours when conditions are clear, ideally when it is at its greatest elongation. This allows the
planet to be found easily, even when using telescopes with 8 cm (3.1 in) apertures. However, great
care must be taken to obstruct the Sun from sight because of the extreme risk for eye damage.
[148]
This method bypasses the limitation of twilight observing when the ecliptic is located at a low
elevation (e.g. on autumn evenings). The planet is higher in the sky and less atmospheric effects
affect the view of the planet. Mercury can be viewed as close as 4° to the Sun near superior
conjunction when it is almost at its brightest.
Mercury can, like several other planets and the brightest stars, be seen during a total solar eclipse.
[149]

Observation history
Ancient astronomers

Mercury, from Liber astronomiae, 1550

The earliest known recorded observations of Mercury are from the MUL.APIN tablets. These
observations were most likely made by an Assyrian astronomer around the 14th century BC.
[150]
The cuneiform name used to designate Mercury on the MUL.APIN tablets is transcribed as
UDU.IDIM.GU\U4.UD ("the jumping planet").[e][151] Babylonian records of Mercury date back to the 1st
millennium BC. The Babylonians called the planet Nabu after the messenger to the gods in their
mythology.[152]
The Greco-Egyptian[153] astronomer Ptolemy wrote about the possibility of planetary transits across
the face of the Sun in his work Planetary Hypotheses. He suggested that no transits had been
observed either because planets such as Mercury were too small to see, or because transits were
too infrequent.[154]

Ibn al-Shatir's model for the appearances of Mercury, showing

the multiplication of epicycles using the Tusi couple, thus eliminating the Ptolemaic eccentrics
and equant.
In ancient China, Mercury was known as "the Hour Star" (Chen-xing 辰星). It was associated with
the direction north and the phase of water in the Five Phases system of metaphysics.
[155]
Modern Chinese, Korean, Japanese and Vietnamese cultures refer to the planet literally as the
"water star" (水星), based on the Five elements.[156][157][158] Hindu mythology used the name Budha for
Mercury, and this god was thought to preside over Wednesday.[159] The god Odin (or Woden)
of Germanic paganism was associated with the planet Mercury and Wednesday.[160] The Maya may
have represented Mercury as an owl (or possibly four owls; two for the morning aspect and two for
the evening) that served as a messenger to the underworld.[161]
In medieval Islamic astronomy, the Andalusian astronomer Abū Ishāq Ibrāhīm al-Zarqālī in the 11th
century described the deferent of Mercury's geocentric orbit as being oval, like an egg or a pignon,
although this insight did not influence his astronomical theory or his astronomical calculations.[162]
[163]
In the 12th century, Ibn Bajjah observed "two planets as black spots on the face of the Sun",
which was later suggested as the transit of Mercury and/or Venus by the Maragha astronomer Qotb
al-Din Shirazi in the 13th century.[164] (Note that most such medieval reports of transits were later
taken as observations of sunspots.[165])
In India, the Kerala school astronomer Nilakantha Somayaji in the 15th century developed a partially
heliocentric planetary model in which Mercury orbits the Sun, which in turn orbits Earth, similar to
the Tychonic system later proposed by Tycho Brahe in the late 16th century.[166]

Ground-based telescopic research

Transit of Mercury. Mercury is visible as a black dot below

and to the left of center. The dark area above the center of the solar disk is a sunspot.

Elongation is the angle between the Sun and the planet, with
Earth as the reference point. Mercury appears close to the Sun.
The first telescopic observations of Mercury were made by Thomas Harriot and Galileo from 1610. In
1612, Simon Marius observed the brightness of Mercury varied with the planet's orbital position and
concluded it had phases "in the same way as Venus and the Moon".[167] In 1631, Pierre
Gassendi made the first telescopic observations of the transit of a planet across the Sun when he
saw a transit of Mercury predicted by Johannes Kepler. In 1639, Giovanni Zupi used a telescope to
discover that the planet had orbital phases similar to Venus and the Moon. The observation
demonstrated conclusively that Mercury orbited the Sun.[28]
A rare event in astronomy is the passage of one planet in front of another (occultation), as seen from
Earth. Mercury and Venus occult each other every few centuries, and the event of May 28, 1737, is
the only one historically observed, having been seen by John Bevis at the Royal Greenwich
Observatory.[168] The next occultation of Mercury by Venus will be on December 3, 2133.[169]
The difficulties inherent in observing Mercury meant that it was far less studied than the other
planets. In 1800, Johann Schröter made observations of surface features, claiming to have observed
20-kilometre-high (12 mi) mountains. Friedrich Bessel used Schröter's drawings to erroneously
estimate the rotation period as 24 hours and an axial tilt of 70°.[170] In the 1880s, Giovanni
Schiaparelli mapped the planet more accurately, and suggested that Mercury's rotational period was
88 days, the same as its orbital period due to tidal locking.[171] This phenomenon is known
as synchronous rotation. The effort to map the surface of Mercury was continued by Eugenios
Antoniadi, who published a book in 1934 that included both maps and his own observations.[96] Many
of the planet's surface features, particularly the albedo features, take their names from Antoniadi's
map.[172]
In June 1962, Soviet scientists at the Institute of Radio-engineering and Electronics of the USSR
Academy of Sciences, led by Vladimir Kotelnikov, became the first to bounce a radar signal off
Mercury and receive it, starting radar observations of the planet.[173][174][175] Three years later, radar
observations by Americans Gordon H. Pettengill and Rolf B. Dyce, using the 300-metre-wide
(330 yd) Arecibo radio telescope in Puerto Rico, showed conclusively that the planet's rotational
period was about 59 days.[176][177] The theory that Mercury's rotation was synchronous had become
widely held, and it was a surprise to astronomers when these radio observations were announced. If
Mercury were tidally locked, its dark face would be extremely cold, but measurements of radio
emission revealed that it was much hotter than expected. Astronomers were reluctant to drop the
synchronous rotation theory and proposed alternative mechanisms such as powerful heat-
distributing winds to explain the observations.[178]

Water ice (yellow) at Mercury's north polar region

In 1965, Italian astronomer Giuseppe Colombo noted that the rotation value was about two-thirds of
Mercury's orbital period, and proposed that the planet's orbital and rotational periods were locked
into a 3:2 rather than a 1:1 resonance.[179] Data from Mariner 10 subsequently confirmed this view.
[180]
This means that Schiaparelli's and Antoniadi's maps were not "wrong". Instead, the astronomers
saw the same features during every second orbit and recorded them, but disregarded those seen in
the meantime, when Mercury's other face was toward the Sun, because the orbital geometry meant
that these observations were made under poor viewing conditions.[170]
Ground-based optical observations did not shed much further light on Mercury, but radio
astronomers using interferometry at microwave wavelengths, a technique that enables removal of
the solar radiation, were able to discern physical and chemical characteristics of the subsurface
layers to a depth of several meters.[181][182] Not until the first space probe flew past Mercury did many of
its most fundamental morphological properties become known. Moreover, technological advances
have led to improved ground-based observations. In 2000, high-resolution lucky
imaging observations were conducted by the Mount Wilson Observatory 1.5-metre (4.9 ft) Hale
telescope. They provided the first views that resolved surface features on the parts of Mercury that
were not imaged in the Mariner 10 mission.[183] Most of the planet has been mapped by the Arecibo
radar telescope, with 5 km (3.1 mi) resolution, including polar deposits in shadowed craters of what
may be water ice.[184]

Research with space probes

Main article: Exploration of Mercury
 MESSENGER being prepared for launch

Mercury transiting the Sun as viewed by the Mars

rover Curiosity (June 3, 2014). [185]

Reaching Mercury from Earth poses significant technical challenges, because it orbits so much
closer to the Sun than Earth. A Mercury-bound spacecraft launched from Earth must travel over
91 million kilometres (57 million miles) into the Sun's gravitational potential well. Mercury has
an orbital speed of 47.4 km/s (29.5 mi/s), whereas Earth's orbital speed is 29.8 km/s (18.5 mi/s).
[111]
Therefore, the spacecraft must make a larger change in velocity (delta-v) to get to Mercury and
then enter orbit,[186] as compared to the delta-v required for, say, Mars planetary missions.
The potential energy liberated by moving down the Sun's potential well becomes kinetic energy,
requiring a delta-v change to do anything other than pass by Mercury. Some portion of this delta-v
budget can be provided from a gravity assist during one or more fly-bys of Venus.[187] To land safely
or enter a stable orbit the spacecraft would rely entirely on rocket motors. Aerobraking is ruled out
because Mercury has a negligible atmosphere. A trip to Mercury requires more rocket fuel than that
required to escape the Solar System completely. As a result, only three space probes have visited it
so far.[188] A proposed alternative approach would use a solar sail to attain a Mercury-synchronous
orbit around the Sun.[189]
Mariner 10
Main article: Mariner 10

Mariner 10, the first probe to visit Mercury

The first spacecraft to visit Mercury was NASA's Mariner 10 (1974–1975).[22] The spacecraft used the
gravity of Venus to adjust its orbital velocity so that it could approach Mercury, making it both the first
spacecraft to use this gravitational "slingshot" effect and the first NASA mission to visit multiple
planets.[190] Mariner 10 provided the first close-up images of Mercury's surface, which immediately
showed its heavily cratered nature, and revealed many other types of geological features, such as
the giant scarps that were later ascribed to the effect of the planet shrinking slightly as its iron core
cools.[191] Unfortunately, the same face of the planet was lit at each of Mariner 10's close approaches.
This made close observation of both sides of the planet impossible,[192] and resulted in the mapping of
less than 45% of the planet's surface.[193]
The spacecraft made three close approaches to Mercury, the closest of which took it to within
327 km (203 mi) of the surface.[194] At the first close approach, instruments detected a magnetic field,
to the great surprise of planetary geologists—Mercury's rotation was expected to be much too slow
to generate a significant dynamo effect. The second close approach was primarily used for imaging,
but at the third approach, extensive magnetic data were obtained. The data revealed that the
planet's magnetic field is much like Earth's, which deflects the solar wind around the planet. For
many years after the Mariner 10 encounters, the origin of Mercury's magnetic field remained the
subject of several competing theories.[195][196]
On March 24, 1975, just eight days after its final close approach, Mariner 10 ran out of fuel. Because
its orbit could no longer be accurately controlled, mission controllers instructed the probe to shut
down.[197] Mariner 10 is thought to be still orbiting the Sun, passing close to Mercury every few
months.[198]
MESSENGER
Main article: MESSENGER

Estimated details of the impact of MESSENGER on April 30,

2015
A second NASA mission to Mercury, named MESSENGER (MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment,
GEochemistry, and Ranging), was launched on August 3, 2004. It made a fly-by of Earth in August
2005, and of Venus in October 2006 and June 2007 to place it onto the correct trajectory to reach an
orbit around Mercury.[199] A first fly-by of Mercury occurred on January 14, 2008, a second on October
6, 2008,[200] and a third on September 29, 2009.[201] Most of the hemisphere not imaged by Mariner
10 was mapped during these fly-bys. The probe successfully entered an elliptical orbit around the
planet on March 18, 2011. The first orbital image of Mercury was obtained on March 29, 2011. The
probe finished a one-year mapping mission,[200] and then entered a one-year extended mission into
2013. In addition to continued observations and mapping of Mercury, MESSENGER observed the
2012 solar maximum.[202]
 Topography of Mercury based on MDIS (Mercury Dual
Imaging System) data
The mission was designed to clear up six key issues: Mercury's high density, its geological history,
the nature of its magnetic field, the structure of its core, whether it has ice at its poles, and where its
tenuous atmosphere comes from. To this end, the probe carried imaging devices that gathered
much-higher-resolution images of much more of Mercury than Mariner 10, assorted spectrometers to
determine the abundances of elements in the crust, and magnetometers and devices to measure
velocities of charged particles. Measurements of changes in the probe's orbital velocity were
expected to be used to infer details of the planet's interior structure.[203] MESSENGER's final
maneuver was on April 24, 2015, and it crashed into Mercury's surface on April 30, 2015.[204][205][206] The
spacecraft's impact with Mercury occurred at 3:26:01 p.m. EDT on April 30, 2015, leaving a crater
estimated to be 16 m (52 ft) in diameter.[207]
BepiColombo
Main article: BepiColombo
The European Space Agency and the Japanese Space Agency developed and launched a joint
mission called BepiColombo, which will orbit Mercury with two probes: one to map the planet and the
other to study its magnetosphere.[208] Launched on October 20, 2018, BepiColombo is expected to
reach Mercury in 2025.[209] It will release a magnetometer probe into an elliptical orbit, then chemical
rockets will fire to deposit the mapper probe into a circular orbit. Both probes will operate for one
terrestrial year.[208] The mapper probe carries an array of spectrometers similar to those
on MESSENGER, and will study the planet at many different wavelengths
including infrared, ultraviolet, X-ray and gamma ray.[210] BepiColombo conducted three of its six
planned Mercury flybys from October 1, 2021[211] to June 19, 2023.[212][213]