UniSim Design PIPESYS Getting Started
UniSim Design PIPESYS Getting Started
UniSim Design PIPESYS Getting Started
PIPESYS
Getting Started
Copyright
June 2005 R350 Release
The information in this help file is subject to change over time. Honeywell may make
changes to the requirements described. Future revisions will incorporate changes,
including corrections of typographical errors and technical inaccuracies.
Honeywell
300-250 York Street
London, Ontario
N6A 6K2
Telephone: (519) 679-6570
Facsimile: (519) 679-3977
Prepared in Canada.
Table of Contents
Welcome to PIPESYS ............................................... iv
Introduction ........................................................ v
Disclaimer......................................................... viii
Warranty .......................................................... viii
A References ...........................................................A-1
ii
iii
iv
Welcome to PIPESYS
Introduction ....................................................................................... v
Disclaimer.........................................................................................viii
Warranty...........................................................................................viii
iv
v
Introduction
A pipeline must transport fluids over diverse topography and
under varied conditions. Ideally this would be done efficiently
with a correctly sized pipeline that adequately accounts for
pressure drop, heat losses and includes the properly specified
and sized inline facilities, such as compressors, heaters or
fittings. Due to the complexity of pipeline network calculations,
this often proves a difficult task. It is not uncommon that during
the design phase an over-sized pipe is chosen to compensate for
inaccuracies in the pressure loss calculations. With multi-phase
flow, this can lead to greater pressure and temperature losses,
increased requirements for liquid handling and increased pipe
corrosion. Accurate fluid modelling helps to avoid these and
other complications and results in a more economic pipeline
system. To accomplish this requires single and multi-phase flow
technology that is capable of accurately and efficiently
simulating the pipeline flow.
v
vi
Figure 1
vi
vii
PIPESYS Features
The PIPESYS extension is functionally equivalent to a UniSim
Design flowsheet operation. It is installed in a flowsheet and
connected to material and energy streams. All PIPESYS
extension properties are accessed and changed through a set of
property views that are simple and convenient to use. Chief
among these—and the starting point for the definition of a
PIPESYS operation—is the Main PIPESYS View:
• Main PIPESYS View - Used to define the elevation profile,
add pipeline units, specify material and energy streams,
choose calculation methods and check results.
vii
viii
Disclaimer
PIPESYS is the proprietary software developed jointly by
Neotechnology Consultants Ltd. (hereafter known as Neotec)
and Honeywell.
Warranty
Neotec, Honeywell or their representatives will exchange any
defective material or program disks within 90 days of the
purchase of the product, providing that the proof of purchase is
evident. All warranties on the disks and guide, and any implied
warranties, are limited to 90 days from the date of purchase.
Neither Neotec, Honeywell nor their representatives make any
warranty, implied or otherwise, with respect to this software and
manuals.
Neither Neotec nor Honeywell shall bear any liability for the loss
of revenue or other incidental or consequential damages arising
from the use of this product.
viii
ix
ix
Elevation Profile Example 1-1
1 Elevation Profile
Example
1.1 Introduction................................................................................... 2
1-1
1-2 Introduction
1.1 Introduction
One of the first and most important steps in adding a PIPESYS
If you would like to follow operation to a UniSim Design flowsheet is the construction of
a more detailed step-by-
the elevation profile. The purpose of this procedure is to create a
step procedure for
creating a PIPESYS case, representation of the pipeline as a connected series of
see Chapter 1 - Gas components with the corresponding position data. In this
Condensate Tutorial
from the PIPESYS example, you will go through the steps to enter an elevation
Tutorial manual. profile components and data. All units of measurement in this
example are SI, but you can change these to whatever unit
system you prefer.
For this case, a simple pipeline consisting of three pipe units and
a pig launcher will be built to demonstrate the PIPESYS
procedures. The figure below shows a schematic of these four
components with coordinate axes.
Figure 1.1
1-2
Elevation Profile Example 1-3
Name Inlet
Vapour Fraction 1.00
Temperature [oC] 45**
Pressure [kPa] 8000**
Molar Flow [kgmole/h] 300**
Mass Flow [kg/h] 6595
LiqVol Flow [m3/h] 17.88
Heat Flow [kJ/h] -2.783e+07
Comp Mass Frac [methane] 0.7822**
Comp Mass Frac [ethane] 0.0803**
Comp Mass Frac [propane] 0.0290**
Comp Mass Frac [i-Butane] 0.0077**
Comp Mass Frac [n-Butane] 0.0246**
Comp Mass Frac [i-Pentane] 0.0074**
Comp Mass Frac [n-Pentane] 0.0072**
Comp Mass Frac [n-Hexane] 0.0012**
Comp Mass Frac [Nitrogen] 0.0098**
Comp Mass Frac [CO2] 0.0409**
Comp Mass Frac [H2S] 0.0097**
1-3
1-4 Adding a PIPESYS Extension
Figure 1.2
1-4
Elevation Profile Example 1-5
Figure 1.3
1-5
1-6 Defining the Elevation Profile
8. Select the cell <empty> for the Centre Line Depth and the
click the Default button. The completed tab is shown below.
Figure 1.4
9. Click the Close button to close the complete Pipe Unit view.
The pipe unit will now appear as an entry in the matrix, with
<empty> in all parameter cells. Pipe #1 has endpoint
coordinates of (1200, 360).
1-6
Elevation Profile Example 1-7
10. To complete the profile data entry, enter 1200 into the
Distance cell and 360 into the Elevation cell. PIPESYS
automatically calculates all the other parameters, as shown
in the figure below.
Figure 1.5
11. Add the second pipe unit to the matrix. Fill in the pipe unit
view with the same specifications as were used for Pipe Unit
#1. You may either re-enter all this information, or use the
Copy and Paste buttons on the Elevation Profile tab.
12. This time specify the second pipe unit endpoint using the
Run and Length parameters instead of Elevation and
Distance. Figure 1.1 shows that the second pipe unit has a
Run of 1200 and a Length of 1227.84. Enter these values
on the Elevation Profile tab.
You may have noticed that the data on the Elevation Profile
tab does not correctly represent the actual geometry of the
pipeline. This is because PIPESYS always assumes a positive
angle for the pipe unit when the Run and Length parameters
are used to specify the coordinates of the endpoint.
13. To correct the matrix data, make a note of the Angle value,
which is 12.23, and then delete the value in the Length cell.
14. Enter -12.23 into the Angle cell. Or alternately, you could
enter the value for the Rise as -260 m.
1-7
1-8 Defining the Elevation Profile
15. To add the Pig Launcher, select the <empty> cell and
choose Pig Launcher from the drop-down list.
Figure 1.6
1-8
Elevation Profile Example 1-9
16. Add a third pipe unit with the same parameters as the
previous two. Using the Run and Rise parameters, specify
the endpoint coordinates. The Run value is 500 (2900-2400)
and the Rise is 180 (280-100). The completed Elevation
Profile tab is shown below.
Figure 1.7
1-9
1-10 Defining the Elevation Profile
Figure 1.8
To add a table to a PFD, 18. Save your completed case as Pipesys1.usc. The PFD
right-click on the PFD and
choose Add Workbook
generated for the completed case, plus a material stream
Table from the drop- table is shown below:
down list.
Figure 1.9
1-10
References A-1
A References
1
American Petroleum Institute, “Subsurface Controlled Subsurface
Safety Valve Sizing Computer Program”, API Manual 14BM, Second
Ed., p. 38, API, January (1978)
2
American Petroleum Institute, Technical Data Book - Petroleum
Refining, API, New York (1982)
3
Aziz, K., Govier, G.W., and Fogarasi, M.,“Pressure Drop in Wells
Producing Oil and Gas”, Journal of Canadian Petroleum
Technologists., Vol. 11, p. 38, July (1972)
4
Baker, O. “Simultaneous Flow of Oil and Gas”, Oil & Gas Journal, Vol.
54, No. 12, p. 185, July (1954)
5
Baker, O. “Experience with Two-Phase Pipelines”, Canadian Oil & Gas
Industry, Vol. 14, No. 3, p. 43, March (1961)
6
Beggs, H.D., and Brill, J.P. “A Study of Two-Phase Flow in Inclined
Pipes”, Journal of Petroleum Technologists, p. 607, May (1973)
7
Bendiksen, K.H., Maines, D., Moe, R., and Nuland, S., “The Dynamic
Two Fluid Model OLGA: Theory and Application”, SPE Paper No.
19451, SPE Production Engineering, May (1991)
8
Burke, N.E., and Kashou, S.F., “History Matching of a North Sea
Flowline Startup Using OLGA Transient Multi-phase Flow Simulator”,
SPE Paper No. 24789, Presented at the 67th Annual SPE Technical
Conference and Exhibition, Washington, DC, October (1992)
9
Chen, N.H., “An Explicit Equation for Friction Factor in Pipe”, Ind. Eng.
Chem. Fund., Vol. 18, No. 3, p. 296 (1979)
10
Dukler, A.E., Wicks, M., and Cleveland, R., “Frictional Pressure Drop
in Two-Phase Flow: B. An Approach Through Similarity Analysis”,
AIChE Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 44, January (1964)
11
Dukler, A.E., “Gas-Liquid Flow in Pipelines”, Monograph, Project NX-
28, AGA/API, May (1969)
12
Duns, H., Jr., and Ros, N., “Vertical Flow of Gas and Liquid Mixtures in
Wells”, Paper No. 22, Section II, World Petroleum Conference,
Frankfurt, Germany (1963)
A-1
A-2
13
Eaton, B.A., Andrews, D.E., Knowles, C.R., Silberberg, I.H., and
Brown, K.E., “The Prediction of Flow Patterns, Liquid Holdup and
Pressure Losses Occurring During Continuous Two-Phase Flow in
Horizontal Pipelines”, Journal of Petroleum Technologists, p. 815,
June (1967)
14
Flanking, O., “Effect of Uphill Flow on Pressure Drop in Design of Two-
Phase Gathering Systems”, Oil & Gas Journal, p. 132, March (1958)
15
Fuchs, P., “The Pressure Limit for Terrain Slugging”, Paper B.4, Proc.
of the 3rd International Conference on Multi-phase Flow, BHRA, The
Hague, Netherlands (1987)
16Govier,
G.W., and Aziz, K., The Flow of Complex Mixtures in Pipes,
Van Nostrand-Reinhold, (1972), reprinted by Robert E. Krieger
Publishing Co., Huntingdon, New York (1977)
17Govier,
G.W., and Fogarasi, M., “Pressure Drop in Wells Producing Gas
and Condensate”, Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technologists,
October (1975)
18
Gregory, G.A., “Estimation of the Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient for
Calculating Heat Loss/Gain in Flowing Wells”, Technical Note No. 4,
Neotechnology Consultants Ltd., Calgary, Canada, March (1991)
19Gregory,
G.A., Mandhane, J., and Aziz, K. “Some Design
Considerations for Two-Phase Flow in Pipes”, Journal of Canadian
Petroleum Technologists, January-March (1975)
20Gregory,
G.A., “Comments on the Prediction of Minimum Unloading
Velocities for Wet Gas Wells”, Technical Note No. 14, Neotechnology
Consultants Ltd., Calgary, Canada, December (1989)
21
Gregory, G.A., “Estimation of the Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient for
the Calculation of Pipeline Heat Loss/Gain”, Technical Note No.3,
Neotechnology Consultants Ltd., Calgary, Canada, October (1984),
1st Revision September (1990), 2nd Revision March (1991)
22
Hooper, W.B., “The Two-K Method Predicts Heat Losses in Pipe
Fittings”, Chemical Engineering, p. 96, August (1981)
23
Hughmark, G.A., “Holdup and Heat Transfer in Horizontal Slug Gas-
Liquid Flow”, Chem. Eng. Sci., Vol 20, p. 1007 (1965)
24
Hughmark, G.A. “Holdup in Gas-Liquid Flow”, Chem. Eng. Prog., Vol.
58, No. 4, p. 62, April (1962)
25
Lockhart, R.W., and Martinelli, R.C. “Proposed Correlation of Data for
Isothermal Two-Phase, Two-Component Flow in Pipes”, Chem. Eng.
Prog., Vol. 45, No. 1, p. 39, January (1949)
A-2
References A-3
26
Mandhane, J., Gregory, G., and Aziz, K., “A Flow Pattern Map for Gas-
Liquid Flow in Horizontal Pipes”, International Journal of Multi-phase
Flow, Vol. 1, p. 537 (1974)
27
Mandhane, J.M., Gregory, G.A., and Aziz, K., “Critical Evaluation of
Friction Pressure-Drop Prediction Methods for Gas-Liquid Flow in
Horizontal Pipes”, Journal of Petroleum Technologists, p. 1348,
October (1977)
28
Mukherjee, H., and Brill, J.P., “Liquid Holdup Correlations for Inclined
Two-Phase Flow”, Journal of Petroleum Technologists, p. 1003, May
(1983)
29Oliemans,
R.V.A., “Two-Phase Flow in Gas-Transmission Pipelines”,
Paper No. 76-Pet-25, Joint Petroleum Mechanical Engineering &
Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Mexico City, Mexico,
September (1976)
30Oliemans,
R.V.A., “Modeling of Gas Condensate Flow in Horizontal
and Inclined Pipes”, Proc., ASME Pipeline Eng. Symp., ETCE, p. 73,
Dallas, Texas, February (1987)
31
Pots, B.F.M., Bromilow, I.G., and Konijn, M.J.W.F., “Severe Slug Flow
in Offshore Flowline/Riser Systems”, SPE Prod. Eng., p. 319,
November (1987)
32Salama,
M.M and Venkatesh, E.S., “Evaluation of API RP 14E
Erosional Velocity Limitations for Offshore Gas Wells”, Paper No.
OTC 4485, presented at the 15th Annual Offshore Technology
Conference, Houston, May (1983)
33Singh,
B., and Gregory, G.A., unpublished work (1983)
34
Taitel, Y., and Dukler, A. “A Model for Predicting Flow Regime
Transitions in Horizontal and Near Horizontal Gas-Liquid Flow”,
AIChE J., Vol. 22, No. 1, p. 47, January (1976)
35
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., private communication (1979)
A-3
A-4
A-4