Elevator Technology Improvements A Snapshot
Elevator Technology Improvements A Snapshot
Elevator Technology Improvements A Snapshot
Department of Urban Planning and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA;
kheir@uic.edu
Abstract: Efficient vertical transportation is vital to a skyscraper’s functional operation and the con-
venience and satisfaction of its tenants. This review complements the author’s previously published
research by updating the readers on innovative hardware and software-based solutions. It lays out,
organizes, and combines extensive and scattered material on numerous aspects of elevator design in
a straightforward and non-technical narrative. Rope-less elevators, the MULTI, artificial intelligence
(AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), and extended reality technologies are some of the developments and
advancements this article examines. The analysis also contextualizes current technical developments
by reviewing how they are used in significant projects such as the One World Trade Center in New
York City. Lastly, the paper examines innovative technologies, such as holographic elevator buttons
and ultraviolet rays that disinfect elevators, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
1. Introduction
1.1. Background
One hundred fifty years ago, cities appeared significantly different than they do
today. Often, the cityscape was flat and uniformly patterned. The heights of residential
and commercial structures were rarely as tall as flagpoles. However, today, cities are
growing vertically. Population increases, rapid urban regeneration, rising land prices,
Citation: Al-Kodmany, K. Elevator active agglomeration, ego, and globalization drive building upward. Indeed, the race to
Technology Improvements: A build the world’s highest skyscraper seems to go on forever, reaching ever-impressive
Snapshot. Encyclopedia 2023, 3, heights. Around the beginning of the new Millennium, in 1998, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia,
530–548. https://doi.org/10.3390/ built the 452 m (1483 ft) Petronas Towers, snatching the title of the world’s tallest building
encyclopedia3020038
from the 442 m (1450 ft) Sears Tower (renamed Willis Tower) constructed in 1973 in Chicago.
Academic Editors: Krzysztof In 2004, Taipei, Taiwan, erected the 508 m (1667 ft) Taipei 101. In 2010, Dubai, UAE, built
Kamil Żur, Raffaele Barretta, the 828 m (2717 ft) Burj Khalifa, the world’s tallest. As such, in just 12 years, the height of
Ramesh Agarwal and Giuseppe Ruta the tallest building almost doubled [1,2].
Besides globalization and land prices, the rapid increase in urban population forces
Received: 12 March 2023
cities to build upward. The United Nations predicts that 70% of the world population in
Revised: 12 April 2023
2050, about 9.7 billion, will live in urban areas, up from 51% in 2010. Such an increase
Accepted: 20 April 2023
entails adding almost a quarter million urban dwellers globally every week. To expand
Published: 24 April 2023
cities horizontally to accommodate urban population increase, we will face sprawl prob-
lems. Sprawl has caused numerous economic, social, and environmental crises and is an
unsustainable way to grow. After learning the hard lessons of urban sprawl ills, planners
Copyright: © 2023 by the author. have reverted to the vertical and compact model [3]. As such, since the turn of the century,
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. many cities have been erecting high-rises worldwide.
This article is an open access article High-rise buildings consume more energy than low-rise buildings for many reasons,
distributed under the terms and including the employment of vertical transportation. Elevators use between 5 and 15% of a
conditions of the Creative Commons high-rise building’s power, so efforts to reduce their energy consumption are worthwhile.
Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// Further, elevators use significant valuable space in a skyscraper. Sometimes, they may oc-
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ cupy 25–40% of the floor plans. Of course, this figure includes all elevators (e.g., passenger,
4.0/).
freight, emergency, and shuttle). Therefore, reducing the required space and number of
shafts is a sought-after goal in elevator design [1].
2. The Basics
2.1. Notes on Elevator History
Humans have used hoists for vertical transportation since the third century BCE.
The ancient Greeks allegedly invented elevators using pulleys and winches. However,
modern elevators, such as those we know today, were developed in the 1800s. In the 1850s,
elevator design shifted from carrying goods to carrying people, and the first elevator safety
devices were invented in 1852. The development of safety devices paved the way for the
advancement of passenger elevators [6].
In 1857, the first passenger elevator was constructed. This elevator was steam-powered
and moved at a leisurely 12 m (40 ft) per minute. Early passenger elevators were considered
more of a spectacle and luxury experience than a mode of transportation. Because tall
buildings were not yet built, higher floors had lower rents due to the need to climb stairs to
access these units—a stark contrast to today’s high-priced penthouse units.
In the 1870s, elevators evolved from a novelty experience reserved for a select few to
a transportation staple. As buildings became taller and taller, increased elevator speeds
became the driving force behind elevator innovation. The first elevator-equipped office
building was built in Downtown Manhattan in 1870, marking the beginning of widespread,
practical elevator history.
As mentioned, elevators were initially powered by steam. However, as they were in-
stalled in office buildings and speed became a priority, they gradually evolved to hydraulic
power. Around this time, the industry standard of 30 s or less wait times was established,
and it is still the industry standard today [6].
Elevator safety and speed advanced even further when electricity became the primary
power source for elevators. Elevator shafts had become an integral part of architectural
design by the 1880s as buildings rose in height. Hence, in 1880, the first electric elevator
was built, and in 1887, automatic doors were produced that locked off the vehicle from
the shaft, making elevators a safer mode of transportation for passengers. In a commercial
building in 1889, the first successful electric elevator was installed.
In 1902, the Otis Elevator Company created the electric traction elevator, a significant
breakthrough. This innovation ingeniously integrated the electrical and mechanical subsys-
tems of an elevator. In 1904, the first elevators of this type were installed in a commercial
building in New York City. Vertical transportation became safer and more convenient
than ever before as elevators evolved and expanded to include more advanced safety and
efficiency features [6].
Overhead. A space within a hoistway lies between the highest-level landing that
is serviced by the elevator and the ceiling of the hoistway. It is vital to have sufficient
headroom to accommodate the elevator’s machinery and supply the space required for the
elevator to operate securely and reliably.
Bank. A cluster of two or more elevators controlled and dispatched by a single or
multiple call-button panel(s).
Elevator System. The elevator system should comply with the building code require-
ments. It should also integrate with other systems, including architectural, structural,
electrical, mechanical, plumbing, technological, and fire protection.
Lobby Floors or Sky Lobbies. These are intermediary floors of a skyscraper where
passengers switch from an express elevator to a local elevator and vice versa.
Wait Time. This is the period between calling the elevator and its arrival.
Figure 1. A schematic illustration of the differences between hydraulic and traction elevators.
Figure 1. A schematic
(Source:illustration
author). of the differences between hydraulic and traction elevators.
(Source: author).
2.5.1. Hydraulic Elevators
2.5.1. Hydraulic Elevators
Throughout the second half of the twentieth century, hydraulic elevators were the
most common type of elevator mechanism used in buildings. The hydraulic elevator car
Throughout the second half of the twentieth century, hydraulic elevators were the
is propelled higher by a piston, driven upward by a pumping mechanism that pushes
most common type of elevator
hydraulic mechanism
fluid into the piston.used in buildings.
In most The hydraulic
instances, hydraulic elevator
elevators car a small
will need
is propelled higher by a piston, driven upward by a pumping mechanism that pushes
hydraulic fluid into the piston. In most instances, hydraulic elevators will need a small
chamber of around 7 m2 (75 ft2) located close to the hoistway to house either the pumping
Encyclopedia 2023, 3 535
chamber of around 7 m2 (75 ft2 ) located close to the hoistway to house either the pumping
or control units [5]. Hydraulic elevators, unlike traction elevators, do not require over-
head hoisting machinery. Their advantages include inexpensive installation, reasonable
maintenance and repair costs, and reliability for hauling heavy loads. However, hydraulic
elevators can reach a maximum speed of 46 m (150 ft) per minute. Because of their lower
velocity, they are often not recommended for tall buildings.
The term “holed” or “hole-less” describes the position of the piston in hydraulic
elevators, which determines which type of elevator it is. As such, we differentiate among
three types of hydraulic elevators:
1. A traditional hydraulic elevator with a sheave that extends below the elevator pit’s
floor. The pit holds the retracting piston as the elevator lowers. It has a maximum
travel range of 18 m (60 ft).
2. Hole-less hydraulic elevators are comparable to regular ones, except they do not need
a sheave or hole in the ground. Compared to a non-telescopic piston, the telescopic
piston design provides a travel distance of up to 15 m (50 ft).
3. In the case of the roped hydraulic elevator, the car is propelled by both ropes and
pistons. It can move a maximum of 18 m (60 ft) in one direction.
comparable-sized
sized conventionalconventional
traction and traction
hydraulicandmotors.
hydraulic motors.
MRL’s MRL’s
reduced reduced
power power con-
consumption
sumption also results from its lower starting current need. MRL and the regenerative
also results from its lower starting current need. MRL and the regenerative drive drive
together
together significantly improve energy efficiency (see next section).
significantly improve energy efficiency (see next section).
3.3.Recent
RecentDevelopments
Developmentsand andAdvances
Advancesin inElevator
ElevatorSystems
Systems
3.1.Regenerative
3.1. RegenerativeDrive
Drive
The regenerative motor,
The regenerative motor, which
which enables
enables “heat”
“heat” energy
energy totobeberecycled
recycledrather
ratherthan
than
squandered,isisaacritical
squandered, criticaladvancement
advancementin inenergy-efficient
energy-efficientelevator elevatortechnology.
technology.ItItworks
worksby by
gatheringand
gathering andtransforming
transformingthe the energy
energy lost
lost during
during braking,
braking, which
which is necessary
is necessary to main-
to maintain
tainelevator’s
the the elevator’s
speed. speed. In other
In other words,words, it converts
it converts the mechanical
the mechanical “heat”
“heat” energyenergy gener-
generated
ated by braking into electrical energy (“regenerated”), which is then transferred to the
by braking into electrical energy (“regenerated”), which is then transferred to the building
building
power powerAn
system. system.
elevatorAn applies
elevatoraapplies
brake in a brake in three
three cases: (1)cases:
when(1) it when
goes up it goes
with upa
with a load of passengers lighter than the counterweight, (2) when it goes down with a
load of passengers lighter than the counterweight, (2) when it goes down with a load
ofload
passengers heavier
of passengers than than
heavier the counterweight,
the counterweight, andand(3) (3)
whenwhenit goes
it goesdown
downwithwitha aload
load
ofofpassengers
passengerslighter
lighterthan
thanthe
thecounterweight.
counterweight. In In these
thesecases,
cases,the
themotor
motorfunctions
functionsas asanan
energy
energy generator, converting mechanical energy into electrical energy and channelingitit
generator, converting mechanical energy into electrical energy and channeling
back
backinto
intothe
thefacility’s
facility’selectrical
electricalsystem.
system.Another
Anotherelevator
elevatoror orother
otherelectrical
electricaldevices
devicescan can
use the generated power. Importantly, these little quantities of energy
use the generated power. Importantly, these little quantities of energy generated generated during the
during
brakes buildbuild
the brakes up to upsignificant savings
to significant over time.
savings overRegenerative drives can
time. Regenerative lower
drives canthe energy
lower the
consumption of a building transportation system by up to 70% [8,9]. The energy needed to
energy consumption of a building transportation system by up to 70% [8,9]. The energy
run the HVAC system is also reduced because the structure and machinery exposed to the
needed to run the HVAC system is also reduced because the structure and machinery
excessive heat produced by conventional motors no longer need to be cooled in the new
exposed to the excessive heat produced by conventional motors no longer need to be
system [10]. Despite the higher costs of the generative drive model, more buildings are
cooled in the new system [10]. Despite the higher costs of the generative drive model,
embracing it due to its energy efficiency.
more buildings are embracing it due to its energy efficiency.
3.2. Elevator Rope
3.2. Elevator Rope
Because it links the elevator motor with the cab, sheaves, and counterweight, the
Because
elevator rope isitcrucial
links the elevatorelevators.
to traction motor with
Thethe cab, sheaves,
car-lifting andtied
ropes are counterweight, the el-
to a counterweight
evator
on rope side
the other is crucial
of thetosheave.
tractionAt
elevators. The of
around 40% car-lifting ropes
its capacity, are
the tied
cab is to a counterweight
balanced with the
on the other side of the sheave. At around 40% of its capacity, the cab is
counterbalance. As a result, energy is conserved. Steel ropes hold cabins. However, balanced with the
these
counterbalance. As a result, energy is conserved. Steel ropes hold cabins. However,
ropes can no longer support their own weight in very tall buildings since they become too these
ropes can no longer support their own weight in very tall buildings since they become too
Encyclopedia 2023, 3 537
long and thick. Energy consumption increases with height as the initial currents and energy
requirements rise. In response, elevator manufacturers have started making stronger cables.
Aramid fiber rope, developed by The Schindler Company, is more durable and lightweight
than a traditional steel rope. Otis created the Gen2 elevator that features polyurethane-
coated ultra-thin wires replacing steel ropes. Mitsubishi used concentric steel wire to create
a stronger, denser string. These stronger, lighter wires efficiently move elevator cabs using
less energy [11,12].
KONE’s UltraRope is among the most notable innovations. KONE is an elevator
engineering company headquartered in Espoo near Helsinki, Finland. UltraRope enables
elevator cars to travel 1000 m (3280 ft) in one run due to its carbon-fiber core and special
high-friction coating. This is twice the typical maximum of 500 m (1640 ft). Notably, the 90%
reduction in rope mass results in significant energy savings. UltraRope weighs 2500 kg for a
2000 kg (4409 lb) elevator traveling 500 m, as opposed to 27,000 kg (59,524 lb) for ultra-high
tension steel ropes. KONE UltraRope elevators will be installed in the 1000 m (3281 ft)
Jeddah Tower in Saudi Arabia (construction is on hold). In one of the tallest residential
buildings in Europe and the first to be outfitted with KONE UltraRope, South Quay Plaza
in London, UK, received eight of these elevators. The Marina Bay Sands in Singapore also
utilizes the UltraRope [13,14].
in the same shaft [17,18]. ThyssenKrupp has been a trailblazing company in the creation
Encyclopedia 2023, 3 of this ground-breaking system. 538
4. Case Study: One World Trade Center, New York City, NY, USA
Advanced
4. Case Study: One elevator
World systems have been
Trade Center, Newinstalled in significant
York City, NY, USA skyscrapers. Examples
include Burj Khalifa in Dubai, UAE; One World Trade Center in New York City, USA; and
Advanced elevator systems have been installed in significant skyscrapers. Examples
Shanghai Tower in Shanghai, China. The best-case scenario would be to review each of
include Burj Khalifa in Dubai, UAE; One World Trade Center in New York City, USA; and
these project examples. Yet, because there is no space to discuss all of them in one article,
Shanghai Tower in Shanghai, China. The best-case scenario would be to review each of
the author must choose one and elaborate on it. Due to its symbolic significance to the
these project examples. Yet, because there is no space to discuss all of them in one article,
United States, One World Trade Center received more attention throughout its design and
the author must choose one and elaborate on it. Due to its symbolic significance to the
construction
United States, than any other
One World Tradeskyscraper. Thousands
Center received of workers,
more attention citizens,its
throughout experts,
design engi-
and
construction than any other skyscraper. Thousands of workers, citizens, experts,technology.
neers, and architects assisted in bringing this structure to the cutting edge of engineers,
In addition,
and architectsthe building’s
assisted owners and
in bringing this authorities
structure towished to useedge
the cutting it as of
a model for future
technology. In
construction [1,2,19].
addition, the building’s owners and authorities wished to use it as a model for future
construction [1,2,19].
4.1. Building Overview
Standing
4.1. Building at 541 m (1776 ft) tall, One World Trade Center is the highest building in
Overview
the Americas
Standing (Figure
at 541 m3). It was
(1776 ft)built in 2014
tall, One andTrade
World was designed
Center isbytheSOM (Skidmore,
highest buildingOwings
in the
and Merrill).
Americas It has
(Figure 3).104 stories
It was above
built ground
in 2014 and and
was 2designed
below. The tower,(Skidmore,
by SOM which serves as the
Owings
and Merrill). It has 104 stories above ground and 2 below. The tower, which serves asstood
property’s focal point, is located on the 16-acre site where the Twin Towers once the
before thefocal
property’s tragic events
point, of September
is located 11, 2001.
on the 16-acre site It integrates
where the Twincutting-edge
Towers once environmental
stood before
andtragic
the greenevents
features, such as advanced
of September 11, 2001. elevator systems,
It integrates and establishes
cutting-edge new architectural
environmental and green
and safety
features, suchstandards.
as advanced The elevator
upgraded life-safety
systems, and systems
establishesgo new
above and beyond
architectural what
and the
safety
New York The
standards. City upgraded
Building Code requires.
life-safety The tower
systems go above is resistant to explosions,
and beyond what thestorms,
New Yorkand
earthquakes
City Building due
Codetorequires.
using over The50,000
tower tons (35,714tocubic
is resistant yards) storms,
explosions, of steel and
and earthquakes
252,000 tons
(180,000 cubic yards) of concrete for constructing the tower. Special safety precautions
due to using over 50,000 tons (35,714 cubic yards) of steel and 252,000 tons (180,000 cubic
include
yards) of pressurized and extra-wide
concrete for constructing the emergency
tower. Special stairs, fireproofing,
safety precautionsand air-filtration
include sys-
pressurized
tems
and for chemical
extra-wide and biological
emergency particles. According
stairs, fireproofing, to the Emporis
and air-filtration systems database, the build-
for chemical and
ing is among
biological the most
particles. expensive
According toin the
the world; One
Emporis Worldthe
database, Trade Center
building is had
amonga total
thecost
mostof
USD 3.9 billion
expensive in the [20,21].
world; One World Trade Center had a total cost of USD 3.9 billion [20,21].
Figure 3. Standing at 541 m (1776 ft), One World Trade Center in NYC, USA, is the tallest building in
the Western hemisphere. (Photo by author).
Encyclopedia 2023, 3, FOR PEER REVIEW 10
4.2.Elevator
4.2. Elevator Systems
Systems
Five of
Five of the
the One
One WTC’s
WTC’s73 73elevators
elevatorsareareexpress,
express,with a top
with speed
a top of more
speed of morethanthan
36.5
kph kph
36.5 [10.16 m/s m/s
[10.16 (33.3 (33.3
ft/s)].ft/s)].
TheseThese
express elevators
express are theare
elevators quickest in the in
the quickest Western Hemi-
the Western
sphere and can
Hemisphere andcarry 1814 kg
can carry 1814(4000 lb). As
kg (4000 a result,
lb). it takes
As a result, it around 40 s to40gos the
takes around 394the
to go m
(1293
394 m ft) leading
(1293 to the observation
ft) leading deck, which
to the observation deck,iswhich
on theis102nd
on thefloor
102nd(Figure
floor 4). Elevator
(Figure 4).
speed was
Elevator increased
speed from 9.1 to
was increased 10.16
from 9.1m/s to accommodate
to 10.16 the expected
m/s to accommodate thelarge number
expected of
large
guests visiting the observation deck at One World Trade Center. The design team antici-
number of guests visiting the observation deck at One World Trade Center. The design
patedanticipated
team 10,000 people working
10,000 peopledaily on the
working office
daily floors
on the and
office overand
floors 5 million
over 5visitors
million per year
visitors
(14,000
per yearper day)per
(14,000 to the
day) observation deck [22].
to the observation deck [22].
Figure4.4.Observation
Figure ObservationDeck
Deckon onthe
the102nd
102ndFloor
Floor
ofof One
One World
World Trade
Trade Center.
Center. Visitors
Visitors taketake
fastfast eleva-
elevators
tors that travel 394 m (1293 ft) from the ground floor to the observation deck in 47 s. (Photo by
that travel 394 m (1293 ft) from the ground floor to the observation deck in 47 s. (Photo by author).
author).
Eight 2.3-ton electric motors were placed on the roof of One WTC to power the fast
Eight Each
elevators. 2.3-ton electricismotors
elevator wereby
controlled placed on the roof
a pulley-like of One
device thatWTC to power
consists theand
of a cab fast
elevators. Eachconnected
counterweights elevator isbycontrolled by a pulley-like
a cable. Tenants device
use an express that to
shuttle consists of sky
get to the a cab and
lobby
counterweights connected by a cable. Tenants use an express shuttle to get to the
on the 64th level, where “local” elevators that travel to higher levels are located. Almost sky lobby
on thecomponent
every 64th level,of
where “local”systems,
the elevator elevatorsincluding
that travel
thetohigh-speed
higher levels are located.
double-deck Almost
elevators,
every component of the elevator systems, including the high-speed double-deck
computerized roller guides, air pressure differential systems, destination dispatching elevators,
computerized
systems, roller guides,
and entertaining air pressure
electronic differential
displays, systems, destination
use cutting-edge technology.dispatching sys-
tems, and entertaining electronic displays, use cutting-edge technology.
4.3. Computerized Roller Guides
4.3. Computerized
It takes moreRoller
than Guides
powerful motors to transport an elevator across long distances
It takes
swiftly. Like more
bulletthan powerful
trains, elevatorsmotors to transport
that operate an elevator
at high across long
speeds require distances
exceptionally
swiftly. tracks
smooth Like bullet trains,
and rail elevators
junctions. Duethat operate atprecision
to alignment high speeds require exceptionally
requirements, the vertical
smooth tracks
placement and railrails
of elevator junctions. Due length
limits their to alignment
to aboutprecision
4.9 m (16requirements,
ft), meaning the
thatvertical
every
placement
elevator of will
path elevator railsa limits
require lot of their lengthThe
rail joints. to about 4.9 m
train-rail (16 ft), meaning
segments that every
in One WTC have
elevator path will require a lot of rail joints. The train-rail segments in One WTC have
been elongated to decrease the number of joints the cars must pass, making the rides more
been elongated
comfortable to decrease [22].
for passengers the number of joints the cars must pass, making the rides more
comfortable for passengers
Since skyscrapers swing [22].
slightly day and night due to temperature changes (con-
traction and expansion), wind forces, and other factors, elevators must account for these
minute variations in the spacing between guide rails [23]. ThyssenKrupp designed the One
WTC’s automatic roller guides to deal with these problems. Innovative roller guides apply
Since skyscrapers swing slightly day and night due to temperature changes (contrac-
tion and expansion), wind forces, and other factors, elevators must account for these mi-
nute3 variations in the spacing between guide rails [23]. ThyssenKrupp designed the One
Encyclopedia 2023, 540
WTC’s automatic roller guides to deal with these problems. Innovative roller guides apply
pressure in the opposite direction of motion, dampening the impact of irregularities. The
elevator’s wheels pressure
stay in touch
in thewith the rails
opposite due of
direction to motion,
the roller guides moving
dampening up and
the impact down
of irregularities. The
with the car. Theelevator’s
polyurethane
wheelsrollers
stay inat Onewith
touch WTC thecan
railsendure minor
due to the rollerdefects in the rail
guides moving up and down
connections. A device thatcar.
with the exerts
The apolyurethane
force against the rails
rollers also
at One WTCcontrols them, minor
can endure reducing the in the rail
defects
likelihood of tremors and rattling due to alignment issues or other defects. These dynamic
connections. A device that exerts a force against the rails also controls them, reducing the
roller guide systems, also known as real-time shock absorbers, are intelligent. They act dynamic
likelihood of tremors and rattling due to alignment issues or other defects. These
roller guide systems, also known as real-time shock absorbers, are intelligent. They act
like a driver who has seen a large pothole in the road and swerved slightly to avoid it. If
like a driver who has seen a large pothole in the road and swerved slightly to avoid it. If
a pothole is on thea right side
pothole of the
is on road,side
the right the of
driver will the
the road, make a slight
driver left turn
will make to avoid
a slight it, to avoid
left turn
and vice versa. This means that the express elevators are not only fast (25% faster than the
it, and vice versa. This means that the express elevators are not only fast (25% faster than
express elevators the
thatexpress
servedelevators
the original
that World Trade
served the Center
original Twin
World Towers)
Trade Centerbut alsoTowers)
Twin com- but also
fortable for passengers, as there
comfortable is no shaking
for passengers, or rattling
as there [22] (Figure
is no shaking 5). [22] (Figure 5).
or rattling
landing operation can last up to 30 min, giving plenty of time to regulate the cabin’s air
pressure. As opposed to this, elevators must adjust the air pressure in as little as 30 s. As a
result, it takes less time for elevator passengers to adjust. To avoid passengers’ ears from
popping, ThyssenKrupp invented pressurized vehicles at One World Trade Center (i.e.,
adding extra air pressure to make up for pressure drops). Engineers at ThyssenKrupp
have conducted a thorough analysis to determine the ideal speed for fans that control
vehicle air pressure as elevators rapidly descend or ascend. Overall, elevators can only
fall at a maximum speed of 10 m per second (33 ft/s) in all cases due to the air pressure
problem [22,23].
4.8. Entertainment
The interior walls of the five high-speed elevators that travel to the observatory
feature large high-definition monitors designed to resemble windows. During the 47 s ride,
the monitors display a historical panorama of the city—a CGI timelapse of New York’s
development over the past 500 years, starting in 1500. In the 1600s, colonial homes sprout
on the island’s meadows. As colonial New York takes shape in the 1700s, the shoreline
shifts further south. Travelers could see the tidal strait known as the East River by 1839.
The old World Trade Center’s south tower, built in 1971, briefly appears to rise above
Manhattan. As the new tower’s steel beams and structural supports eventually spindle
Encyclopedia 2023, 3 542
outward into being, the building seems to come together around the elevator just in time
for arrival on the 102nd floor [22,26].
Figure
Encyclopedia 2023, 3, FOR PEER REVIEW 6. Conventional
Figure Elevator
6. Conventional System
Elevator versus
System Circulating
versus Multi-Car
Circulating Elevator
Multi-Car System.
Elevator (Source:
System. au- 16
(Source:
thor).
author).
Figure7.7.Multi-Directional
Figure Multi-DirectionalElevators.
Elevators.(Source:
(Source:author).
author).
7. Summary
This article reviews milestone elevator system developments. Overall, with continuous
technological advancements, elevators will be able to meet the requirements of buildings
with extreme heights. Digital innovations will support urbanization well into the foresee-
able future, making it easier for passengers to travel across buildings conveniently and
safely. Sustained collaboration between engineers, architects, computer scientists, elevator
manufacturers, and builders may lead to cost-effective solutions that improve performance
and promote efficiency [42,43]. The following offers essential highlights.
7.6. Speed
Elevator speed has improved remarkably in the recent past. However, research
indicates that elevator technology may be getting dangerously close to the speed limits
that human riders can tolerate. Despite efforts to make for a comfortable ride, such as air
conditioning, pressurized cabs, and decreased travel vibration, faster speeds may make
humans sick. So, other development areas will soon become more important than pure
speed to engineers and elevator firms. These efforts include purified air circulation systems,
pressurized cabs, efficient evacuation, decreased vibration, and, most importantly, reduced
manufacturing costs and maintenance [52].
References
1. Al-Kodmany, K. Tall Buildings and Elevators: A Review of Recent Technological Advances. Buildings 2015, 5, 1070–1104.
[CrossRef]
2. Al-Kodmany, K. Smart elevator systems. J. Mech. Mater. Mech. Res. 2023, 6, 41–54. [CrossRef]
Encyclopedia 2023, 3 547
3. Du, P.; Wood, A.; Stephens, B. Empirical Operational Energy Analysis of Downtown High-Rise vs. Suburban Low-Rise Lifestyles:
A Chicago Case Study. Energies 2016, 9, 445. [CrossRef]
4. Zhang, X.; Zubair, M.U. Extending the useful life of elevators through appropriate maintenance strategies. J. Build. Eng. 2022,
51, 104347. [CrossRef]
5. Abe, S.; Watanabe, E. History of elevators and related research. IEEJ Trans. Fundam. Mater. 2004, 124, 679–687. [CrossRef]
6. Oldfield, P. The sustainable impact of height. In The Sustainable Tall Building; Routledge: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; pp. 3–25.
7. Hamouche, W.; Maurini, C.; Vidoli, S.; Vincenti, A. Multi-parameter actuation of a neutrally stable shell: A flexible gear-less
motor. Proc. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2017, 473, 20170364. [CrossRef]
8. Retolaza, I.; Zulaika, I.; Remirez, A.; Cabello, M.J.; Campos, M.A.; Ramos, A. New Design For Installation (Dfi) Methodology
For Large Size And Long Life Cycle Products: Application To An Elevator. In Proceedings of the International Conference on
Engineering Design, ICED21. Gothenburg, Sweden, 16–20 August 2021; pp. 2237–2246. [CrossRef]
9. Lin, K.-Y.; Lian, K.-Y. Actual measurement on regenerative elevator drive and energy saving benefits. In Proceedings of the 2017
International Automatic Control Conference (CACS), Pingtung, Taiwan, 12–15 November 2017; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021;
pp. 1–5. [CrossRef]
10. Erica, D.; Godec, D.; Kutija, M.; Pravica, L.; Pavlić, I. Analysis of Regenerative Cycles and Energy Efficiency of Regenerative
Elevators. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Electrical Drives & Power Electronics (EDPE), Dubrovnik,
Croatia, 22–24 September 2021; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 21–219.
11. Kutija, M.; Pravica, L.; Godec, D.; Erica, D. Regenerative energy potential of roped elevator systems-a case study. In Proceedings
of the 2021 IEEE 19th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (PEMC), Gliwice, Poland, 25–29 April 2021;
IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 284–291.
12. Yang, D.-H.; Kim, K.-Y.; Kwak, M.K.; Lee, S. Dynamic modeling and experiments on the coupled vibrations of building and
elevator ropes. J. Sound Vib. 2017, 390, 164–191. [CrossRef]
13. Mohaney, S.; Shah, M. Emerging Trends in Vertical Elevating System. Int. J. Eng. Manag. Res. (IJEMR) 2015, 5, 51–56.
14. Yaman, O.; Karakose, M. Auto correlation based elevator rope monitoring and fault detection approach with image processing.
In Proceedings of the 2017 International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing Symposium (IDAP), Malatya, Turkey, 16–17
September 2017; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 1–5. [CrossRef]
15. Mishra, K.M.; Huhtala, K.J. Fault detection of elevator systems using multilayer perceptron neural network. In Proceedings of the
2019 24th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Zaragoza, Spain, 10–13
September 2019; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 904–909.
16. Hirasawa, K.; Eguchi, T.; Zhou, J.; Yu, L.; Hu, J.; Markon, S. A Double-Deck Elevator Group Supervisory Control System Using
Genetic Network Programming. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C (Appl. Rev.) 2008, 38, 535–550. [CrossRef]
17. Cortés, P.; Muñuzuri, J.; Vázquez-Ledesma, A.; Onieva, L. Double deck elevator group control systems using evolutionary
algorithms: Interfloor and lunchpeak traffic analysis. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 155, 107190. [CrossRef]
18. Li, K.; Mannan, M.; Xu, M.; Xiao, Z. Electro-hydraulic proportional control of twin-cylinder hydraulic elevators. Control Eng.
Pract. 2001, 9, 367–373. [CrossRef]
19. Ming, Z.; Han, S.; Zhang, Z.; Xia, S. Elevator Safety Monitoring System Based on Internet of Things. Int. J. Online Eng. 2018, 14,
121–133.
20. Siikonen, M. People Flow in Buildings; John Wiley & Sons.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021. [CrossRef]
21. Makar, M.; Pravica, L.; Kutija, M. Supercapacitor-Based Energy Storage in Elevators to Improve Energy Efficiency of Buildings.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7184. [CrossRef]
22. Yao, W.; Jagota, V.; Kumar, R.; Ather, D.; Jain, V.; Quraishi, S.J.; Osei-Owusu, J. Study and Application of an Elevator Failure
Monitoring System Based on the Internet of Things Technology. Sci. Program. 2022, 2022, 1–9. [CrossRef]
23. Parker, D.; Wood, A. One World Trade Center, New York, USA. In The Tall Buildings Reference Book; Routledge: Boca Raton, FL,
USA, 2013; pp. 496–501.
24. Lewis, K.; Holt, N. Case Study: One World Trade Center, New York. CTBUCH J. 2011, III, 14–19.
25. Gershon, R.R.; Qureshi, K.A.; Rubin, M.S.; Raveis, V.H. Factors Associated with High-Rise Evacuation: Qualitative Results from
the World Trade Center Evacuation Study. Prehospital Disaster Med. 2007, 22, 165–173. [CrossRef]
26. McAllister, T.P.; Sadek, F.; Gross, J.L.; Averill, J.D.; Gann, R.G. Overview of the Structural Design of World Trade Center 1, 2, and 7
Buildings. Fire Technol. 2013, 49, 587–613. [CrossRef]
27. Langewiesche, W. American Ground: Unbuilding the World Trade Center; North Point Press: New York, NY, USA, 2010.
28. Wut, T.M. Elevator Energy-Efficient Projects in the Next Generation of High-Rise Green Buildings. In Sustainable Energy and Green
Finance for a Low-Carbon Economy: Perspectives from the Greater Bay Area of China; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp.
245–258.
29. Stenberg, J. A Methodology for Evaluating Elevator Components’ Installability Derived from Design for Assembly Principles.
Master’s Thesis, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland, 2016.
30. Low, C.A. Harnessing consumer smartphone and wearable sensors for clinical cancer research. NPJ Digit. Med. 2020, 3, 1–7.
[CrossRef]
Encyclopedia 2023, 3 548
31. Singhal, T.; Phutane, M. Elevating Haptics: An Accessible and Contactless Elevator Concept with Tactile Mid-Air Controls. In
Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Yokohama, Japan,
8–13 May 2021. [CrossRef]
32. Nagaraj, S.; Srividya, K.; Puviyarasi, B.; Santhosh, K.; Sabareeswaran, N. Smart Elevator Cabin Sanitization and Disinfection for
COVID. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Communication, Computing and Internet of Things (IC3IoT),
Chennai, India, 10–11 March 2022; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 1–6. [CrossRef]
33. Gichane, M.M.; Byiringiro, J.B.; Chesang, A.K.; Nyaga, P.M.; Langat, R.K.; Smajic, H.; Kiiru, C.W. Digital Triplet Approach for
Real-Time Monitoring and Control of an Elevator Security System. Designs 2020, 4, 9. [CrossRef]
34. Yin, C.; Du, L. Design of Intelligent Comprehensive Security System for Existing Office Building. In Proceedings of the IOP
Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Shanghai, China, 16–18 August 2019; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2019;
Volume 358, p. 042001. [CrossRef]
35. Kong, L.; Ma, B. Intelligent manufacturing model of construction industry based on Internet of Things technology. Int. J. Adv.
Manuf. Technol. 2020, 107, 1025–1037. [CrossRef]
36. Liew, Y.C.; Lim, C.S.; Tan, M.L.P.; Tan, C.W. A Review of Multi-Car Elevator System. J. Teknol. 2015, 73, 81–87. [CrossRef]
37. Gerstenmeyer, S.; Peters, R. Circulating multi car lift system—Traffic concept and analysis. Transp. Syst. Build. 2017, 1, 1–21.
[CrossRef]
38. Gerstenmeyer, S. Traffic Analysis for a Multi Car Lift System Used as Local Group. In Proceedings of the 9th Symposium on Lift
and Escalator Technologies, Northampton, UK, 19–20 September 2018; Lift and Escalator SYMPOSIUM: Northampton, UK, 2018;
Volume 9, pp. 253–262.
39. Chandra Mohapatra, D. A Review on Multi-Directional Elevator. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol. 2019, 10, 11—126.
40. Ishimaru, S.; Yamaguchi, S. A simplified mathematical modeling and zone scheduling for multi-directional multi-car elevators. In
Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 4th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE), Osaka, Japan, 27–30 October 2015; IEEE:
Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 61–64. [CrossRef]
41. Qiu, L.; He, C.; Yi, G.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Y.; Rao, Y.; Zhang, L. Energy-Based Vibration Modeling and Solution of High-Speed
Elevators Considering the Multi-Direction Coupling Property. Energies 2020, 13, 4821. [CrossRef]
42. Marani, Y.; Telegenov, K.; Feron, E.; Kirati, M.-T.L. Drone reference tracking in a non-inertial frame using sliding mode control
based Kalman filter with unknown input. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications
(CCTA), Trieste, Italy, 23–25 August 2022; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 9–16. [CrossRef]
43. Kougawa, Y.; Omachi, A.; Iwase, S.; Sakurai, K. Hitachi’s Core Concept for Elevator and Escalator Products and Services, and
Concept Model. Hitachi Rev. 2017, 66, 197.
44. Butry, D.T.; Chapman, R.E.; Huang, A.L.; Thomas, D. A Life-Cycle Cost Comparison of Exit Stairs and Occupant Evacuation
Elevators in Tall Buildings. Fire Technol. 2010, 48, 155–172. [CrossRef]
45. Yanbin, Z.; Shuangchang, F.; Zheyi, L.; Jie, C. Research On Intelligent Lighting System Of Elevator Ground Gap. In Proceedings
of the 2020 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Human-Computer Interaction (ICHCI), Sanya, China, 4–6
December 2020; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 25–28.
46. Dbouk, T.; Drikakis, D. On airborne virus transmission in elevators and confined spaces. Phys. Fluids 2021, 33, 011905. [CrossRef]
47. Harris, T.M.; Eranki, P.L.; Landis, A.E. Life cycle assessment of proposed space elevator designs. Acta Astronaut. 2019, 161,
465–474. [CrossRef]
48. Kong, T.; Hu, T.; Zhou, T.; Ye, Y. Data Construction Method for the Applications of Workshop Digital Twin System. J. Manuf. Syst.
2020, 58, 323–328. [CrossRef]
49. Ma, X.; Chengkai, L.; Ng, K.H.; Tan, H.-P. An Internet of Things-Based Lift Predictive Maintenance System. IEEE Potentials 2020,
40, 17–23. [CrossRef]
50. Yang, G.; Liang, H.; Wu, C.; Cao, X. Construction hoist security application for tall building construction in wireless networks.
Autom. Constr. 2012, 27, 147–154. [CrossRef]
51. Kwok, K.C.; Burton, M.D.; Abdelrazaq, A.K. Wind-induced motion of tall buildings: Designing for habitability. American Society
of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 2015.
52. Siikonen, M.L.; Hakonen, H. Efficient evacuation methods in tall buildings. Elev. World 2003, 51, 78–83.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.