Lexis 3916
Lexis 3916
Lexis 3916
Electronic version
URL: http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/3916
DOI: 10.4000/lexis.3916
ISSN: 1951-6215
Publisher
Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3
Electronic reference
Alejandro Barrena Jurado, « A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters », Lexis [Online],
14 | 2019, Online since 16 December 2019, connection on 20 April 2020. URL : http://
journals.openedition.org/lexis/3916 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.3916
I would like to thank Carmen Portero Muñoz, senior Lecturer at the University of Cordoba, for
instilling in me a great love of morphology through her lectures. Her supervision and advice, but
most of all, her passion and dedication, were fundamental for me to write this paper.
Introduction
1 The use of blending as a morphological word-formation process does not cease to
increase through the years. Some reasons behind this reality are probably blends’
creative effects, which may be used to capture people’s attention, or the degree of
recognizability of the bases, which makes it very easy for language users to recover
them. What is clear is the fact that, today, it is rare to read an article in a newspaper or
scroll down your Twitter feed without coming across at least one of these creations.
2 From a linguistic perspective, however, the process of blending is way more interesting
than the acknowledgment of the speakers’ wittiness when they coin these words. In
fact, the creation of blended words gives rise to what morphologists call ‘splinters’, that
is, elements that are used recurrently in the formation of new words, such as ‘-oholic’
in shopoholic. The nature of splinters remains quite dubious. On the one hand, new
blends containing them could be seen as coinages that take the same source word as an
element of the lexeme. Following this approach, new words ending in ‘-oholic’ would be
seen as blends which take alcoholic as their second source word. On the other hand,
they might be treated as words that are formed by attaching a suffix to a base.
Following this interpretation, we would be considering ‘splinters’ as affixes, that is,
morphemic elements that acquire some meaning. In this way, new words containing ‘-
oholic’ would not necessarily take the word ‘alcoholic’ itself as their second source
word. Although this discussion remains open and it is difficult to support strongly one
of these views, new approaches to grammar and morphology make it easier to account
for the formation of these blends. One of these theories is Construction Morphology,
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 2
which holds the belief that words, just like any other elements in the language, are
constructions, that is, pairings of form and meaning.
3 In any case, not every splinter is used with the same frequency. Some elements might
be used in a limited number of blends, whereas some others could be used in hundreds
of new words. Such is the case of ‘-gasm’, a sequence coming from the word orgasm,
which seems to be the basis of a very large number of words. A deep study of the new
words, as well as their semantics, might shed some light on the nature of this splinter.
Furthermore, the use of constructional schemas appears to be quite appropriate when
it comes to specifying the differences in use of this splinter.
2. Theoretical framework
2.1. Blending as a conceptual mechanism
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 3
[2007: 9-10] claim that “[the] coherent ‘package of knowledge’ that surrounds a
category and is activated when we use or hear a word is known as a conceptual frame
[…] all our coherent bits of knowledge are structured in conceptual frames”. Thus,
frames could be characterized as the pieces of information evoked by words. They are
essential to foster communication and involve our perception of the world.
8 Regarding the notion of conceptual domain, Radden & Dirven [2007: 11] state:
[it] is the general field to which a category or frame belongs in a given situation. For
example, a knife belongs to the domain of ‘eating’ when used for cutting bread on
the breakfast table, but to the domain of ‘fighting’ when used as a weapon. Whereas
frames are specific knowledge structures surrounding categories, conceptual
domains are very general areas of conceptualization. Some typical domains are
those of ‘space’, ‘time’, ‘emotion’, ‘sports’, ‘travelling’, etc. Conceptual domains
crosscut with frames and thus allow us to link frames to one another.
9 Mental spaces are defined by Fauconnier & Turner [2002: 102] as follows:
Small conceptual packets constructed as we think and talk, for purposes of local
understanding and action. They are very partial assemblies containing elements,
structured by frames and cognitive models… [They] operate in working memory
but are built up partly by activating structures available from long-term memory.
10 They are described by Radden & Dirven [2007: 30-31] as “short-lived packages of
knowledge evoked on-line in communication”. The scholars use this explanation as a
starting point to introduce conceptual blending, which is described as “the integration
of two or more spaces into a “blended space” [which] inherits partial structure from its
input spaces and has emergent meaning of its own”. The consideration that the
blended space has its own emergent meaning is supported by Ungerer & Schmid
[1996: 259], who claim that the new blended space’s set up “differs from those of the
two input spaces”.
11 Taylor [2012] follows the same definition and illustrates conceptual blending with the
example of someone imagining how a rug in a shop would fit their living room in their
house. By doing so, the customer is creating a blended space (the image of the rug in
their living room) through the fusion of elements from two different input spaces (the
rug in the shop, its original location, as the first mental space; and the living room,
without the rug, as the second space). Another very important aspect of conceptual
blending highlighted by Taylor is the fact that it is not a compositional operation, but
rather a selectional one. Taylor [2012: 265] points out that “the process is not
compositional, with one (mental) space being added to, or superimposed on, the other.
Integration involves selective activation of elements from the different spaces,
whereby discrepancies are overlooked and differences in time and space are
compressed”.
12 In addition, the possibilities of conceptual blending are numerous, as the creation of a
blended space is not only restricted to two input spaces. Fauconnier & Turner [2002: 8]
argue that the process “can operate over any number of mental spaces as inputs.
Blending can also apply repeatedly: The product of blending can become the input to a
new operation of blending”. The previous statement underlines the recursive nature of
the phenomenon subject to study.
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 4
13 Within the study of conceptual blending, many different elements and processes can be
found. One of them is lexical blending, frequently referred to as ‘morphological
blending’. In fact, Ungerer & Schmid [1996: 268] argue that morphological blends are
the best exponent to study conceptual blending.
14 The importance in use of these words has been a subject of debate throughout the
years, with some authors claiming that lexical blending was not a common strategy in
language at all, and therefore not a major morphological process. Nevertheless, some
researchers disagree, including Cannon [2000], among others. Crystal [1995: 130] claims
that “blending seems to have increased in popularity in the 1980s, being increasingly
used in commercial and advertising contexts”, although he casts some doubt on the
success of the words coined by this process, explaining that most of them might have a
very short lifespan prior to their disappearance. Taylor [2012: 266] notes that these
lexemes are “often employed to name new products, new institutions, and new
practices and concepts”. What is clear is that the use of this process is becoming ever
more common and anybody is likely to find new blends when reading online news or
participating in social media.
15 Lexical blends are defined by Arndt-Lappe & Plag [2013: 541] as “two-constituent
compounds in which at least one constituent has lost some phonological material, and
in which the left, or initial, part of Word 1 and the right, or final, part of Word 2
survives”. The structural pattern described by these scholars should not, however, be
taken as a defining rule of morphological blends, as many instances of words formed by
this process can be found which do not take the first and second elements from the
first and second source words, respectively. One example is Whatsnap, a term coined by
fusing the first elements of both WhatsApp and Snapchat. The previous case could be
seen as an instance of clipped compounding, since both bases are equally clipped and
semantically equivalent, i.e. one is not subordinated to the other. However, I will
restrict clipped compounding to cases in which an already existing compound word is
shortened.
16 Beliaeva [2014: 30] proposes a similar definition of lexical blends, which encapsulates
what previous scholars state about the process, but is not as problematic as regards
their structure. She defines a blend as:
a lexical item formed by merging together two (or more) source forms, so that 1)
only part of their orthographical and/ or phonological material is preserved, and 2)
they have not been formed by concatenation of morphs.
17 In terms of conceptual blending, Kemmer [2006: 71] provides a very insightful
definition, characterizing blends as “words that are cognitively linked to pre-existing
words which are co-activated when the blend is used”. This definition is highly
concerned with the cognitive nature underlying this word-formation mechanism, and
it is quite appropriate in order to understand lexical blending as a sub-type of a major,
overarching category, that of conceptual blending. An important characteristic of
blends is their iconic nature. As Fandrych [2008: 111] demonstrates, “the name
‘blending’ is metaphorical, as blends ‘mix’ random parts of existing lexemes (‘splinters’)
– structurally and semantically – and there is the additional semantic component
BLENDING/MIXTURE… their forms reflect their referents”.
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 5
18 Although many aspects of blends are still to be studied, they might be one of the most
important grammatical resources of the language, since, according to Taylor [2012: 266]
they “can even give rise to what appear to be new morphological resources”. One
example is the emergence of new affixes that might become productive, as will be
discussed in the subsequent section of this work.
19 The classification of blends has been diverse through the literature, and different
taxonomies have been proposed. Pound [1914], for instance, distinguishes different
categories depending on the origin or the cause of coinage of the words, whereas some
other scholars categorize lexical blends in relation to their structure (see Algeo [1977];
Bauer [1983]; Beliaeva [2014]).
20 Some research studies (see Algeo [1997]; Gries [2004b]; Kemmer [2006]) take into
consideration the presence or absence of phonemic or graphemic overlap, that is, the
presence in the blended words of phonemic elements or graphemes that are shared by
both the two source words. Algeo [1997: 56-57] makes another distinction,
differentiating syntagmatic blends, “the combination of two forms that occur
sequentially in the speech chain”, such as Chicagorilla (Chicago + gorilla) from associative
blends, where the source words are “linked in the word-maker’s mind and thence in his
language”, as in words like shill (shiver + shill). A similar distinction is made by Bauer
[2006: 502-503], who classifies blends into syntagmatic or paradigmatic according to
their origin. Paradigmatic origin blends are those where the source words “are in a
paradigmatic relationship with each other”, as in smog ( smoke + fog), while in
syntagmatic origin blends their source words are characterized by being “in a
syntagmatic relationship to each other”, as it happens in motel (motor + hotel). Beliaeva
[2014] classifies blends in purely structural terms, depending on the parts of each
source word (initial, final) are kept in the blended word. Choroleeva [2015: 902] also
distinguishes endocentric from exocentric blends, following a terminology that has
long since been applied to classify compound words in English. According to her, in
endocentric blends “the first component modifies the second one, the latter
functioning as a semantic head. In this case, the two elements of the derived lexeme are
in attributive relations”, whereas in exocentric blends “the derived form consists of
components which are semantically on a par because both function as semantic heads”.
Choroleeva’s distinction is thus equivalent to Bauer’s [2006].
21 Similarity and recognizability are two fundamental characteristics in the formation of
English lexical blends. The operation of conceptual integration can be easily identified
in these types of coinages, since they are combinations of parts of the two source
words, which might be clipped or overlapped but are not radically transformed. The
source words are thus easily recoverable. In relation to this issue, Lehrer [1996: 366]
claims that the degree of similarity between the blend and the source words has an
impact in the levels of recognizability of the blend and in its understanding. He states
that “the more material from the target word that is present, the easier the blend is to
identify […] if one part of a blend is identified, its semantics will be relevant to
identifying the other part”. In addition, Gries [2004b] explains that when coining
blends, both source words are fused in such a way so as to remain recognizable and to
be quite similar to the blend itself, as regards not only letters or graphemes, but also
phonemes, length and prosodic aspects like stress pattern.
22 One of the internal aspects of blends which has received most attention has been the
location of their switch-point, that is, the place in the blend where the transition from
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 6
the first to the second source words is found. However, no definite conclusions have
been found and the generalizations proposed cannot be used to account for all the
existing blends. The ideal situation in the case of blending is the existence of phonemic
or graphemic overlap, so that the transition is quite natural. In these cases, identifying
a specific location as the blend’s switch-point is an arduous task, as the material to be
considered for that aim is shared by the two input words. Kelly [1998] notices that
whole syllables tend to be preserved and the switch-point normally occurs within
syllabic boundaries. Nevertheless, this is not always the case. Many scholars have used
corpora to reach conclusions, but they have not reached an agreement. Even though
their frequency varies, switch-points can be virtually found in any place within the
syllabic constituents of the words constituting the blend.
23 Another interesting feature of blends which has been extensively studied is their stress.
There are two main perspectives on this issue. The first one, proposed by Cannon
[1986: 746] establishes a relationship between the stress of the blend and the length of
the source words, with the longer word dictating the primary stress of the blend. The
second approach to blend stress highlights the importance of the second source word,
arguing that it is always its stress pattern which is kept in the blend (see Gries [2004a];
Arndt-Lappe and Plag [2013]).
2.3. Splinters
2.3.1. The evolution of the term
24 This section presents an overview of the notion of ‘splinter’, as well as a revision of the
evolution of the concept through the literature. The term has been traditionally
associated with the morphological process of lexical blending, as a label to identify
what Bauer, Lieber & Plag [2013: 19] refer to as “a portion of a word that is non-
morphemic to begin with but has been split off and used recurrently on new bases”.
25 The term ‘splinter’ was originally used by Berman in 1961 to refer to these elements of
a dubious nature. Berman [1961: 279] introduced the label in his definition of blending
as “a process of coining new words under which a blend is formed by adding the
splinter of the last initial word to the stem or to the shortened substitute of the stem of
the first initial word (words)”. It is important to note that Berman uses the phrase
‘initial word’ to refer to what has been named ‘source word’ in this work. It is
interesting to consider the fact that his definition does not view blends as fusions of
elements from two words, but rather as the addition of a portion of a word to the stem
of another lexeme. In his description of the process, Berman somehow equates the
nature of ‘splinters’ to that of suffixes. Nevertheless, the scholar’s depiction of
‘splinters’ remains quite vague.
26 Adam’s [1993: 142] treatment of the term is a little more informative. He makes it clear
that these elements are neither morphemes nor ‘compound-elements’, stating that
“usually splinters are irregular in form, that is, they are parts of morphs, though in
some cases there is no formal irregularity, but a special relationship of meaning
between the splinter and some ‘regular’ word in which it occurs”.
27 Soudanek [1998] expands on the notion of splinter, distinguishing two different types:
initial and final splinters. Fandrych [2008: 112] explains this difference on the grounds
of the location of the element in the blend, by claiming that:
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 7
Initial splinters may be the first or the second element, while final splinters can
only become the second element of blends. Overlaps, for example, motel, often
result from the merging of initial and final splinters. Splinters can even give rise to
new morphological units through reanalysis.
28 Fandrych’s explanation includes some very interesting remarks that are relevant to
any discussion of English blends. On the one hand, the scholar acknowledges the
existence of initial splinters that could also be used recursively to create new blends,
and the possibility that they can be the second element of the blended word, as in
Whatsnap, a lexeme coined by fusing two initial splinters (coming from Whatsapp and
Snapchat). On the other hand, the potential of these elements is emphasized, as
Fandrych explains that the use of these elements could result in novel morphological
units.
29 López-Rúa [2002: 37] carries out an exhaustive study on blends providing one of the
most detailed definitions of splinters up to date. She defines them as:
those graphic and phonemic sequences (not only in blends but also in peripheral
initialisms) which are neither inflectional nor derivational morphemes, nor
combining forms (electro-, -scope), and whose length generally allows their
identification as belonging to a previous word. Consequently, splinters tend to be
syllables or units larger than syllables in their sources, as Ox– and –bridge in
Oxbridge (‘OXford and CamBRIDGE), or Digi– and –alt in Digiralt (‘DIGItal radar
ALTimeter’). When they are shorter than syllables, their constituents are the
syllable onset (i.e. the prevocalic consonant or consonants); the onset and the
nucleus (prevocalic consonants + vowel); or the rhyme (vowel + postvocalic
consonants or coda).
30 In her definition, she stresses the idea that these sequences do not possess a
morphemic status. It is also interesting to note that she distinguishes splinters from
combining forms, a term that has often been used interchangeably with the previous,
as mentioned by Correia Saavedra [2014: 56].
31 Bauer, Lieber & Plag’s [2013: 459] definition of splinters as “originally (mostly) non-
morphemic portions of a word that have been split off and used in the formation of
new words with a specific new meaning” does not add much to the literature, but
summarizes briefly the main aspects of these sequences that have been previously
discussed.
32 Beliaeva [2014: 32] clarifies some terminological issues by stating that:
this term is used in at least two different senses. According to one interpretation,
any “shorter substitutes” of words (Adams 1973: 142) should be called splinters. The
other approach is to use this term only for those word parts that have started to be
used productively in more than one blend, e.g. –(a)holic,–(a)nomics (Bauer
2006: 503).
33 Choroleeva’s [2015] work sheds new light on the topic, as she discusses the different
approaches to the nature of splinters and the formation of English blends: one of them
considers blends to be formed by suffixation, providing the elements subject to study
with a morphemic status, whereas the other views blends as being created on the basis
of analogical operations. In her work, Choroleeva [2015: 903] explains that:
Some linguists believe that elements of the type are morpheme-like and may in the
course of time become free morphemes like burger if their productivity increases.
This means that the words containing such suffixoidal elements should not be
treated as telescopic. According to other authors, however, blend words bring
about blend words, not new morphemes.
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 8
2.3.2. Morphemization
38 The idea that splinters may acquire morphemic status is only supported by some
research studies, in favour of the approach that considers splinters to be suffixoids, as
opposed to viewing blends as the output of analogical processes. For this reason, the
precise moment when a splinter can be treated as a morpheme remains unclear. The
most obvious indicator of their status is the splinter’s productivity. Nonetheless, as
Lehrer [1998: 5] affirms, “whether and when a splinter becomes productive appears to
depend on nonlinguistic, mostly chance factors”, which complicates things when it
comes to analyzing these forms.
39 In fact, Lalic-Lrstin [2014: 258] follows some previous scholars and concludes that:
there is some disagreement as to what are the prerequisites for a splinter like this
to become a legitimate morpheme. Warren 1990 believes a new morpheme emerges
as soon as it participates in the formation of a new blend, whereas Lehrer 1998 finds
it necessary for the splinter to gain some frequency in blend formation in order to
become a fully fledged morpheme.
40 Some scholars have attempted to quantify the necessary number of lexemes including a
splinter to consider it a suffixoid. Among them, Fischer [1998: 65] claims that there
might be at least three neologisms. Nevertheless, a consensus has not been reached,
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 9
either for the number of neologisms or for the fact that frequency is an adequate
measure tool to provide splinters with such a status.
41 One of the latest efforts to account for the morphemization of splinters has been made
by Correia Saavedra [2014], who has developed an automated method based on a script
capable of processing huge amounts of data and to signal which splinters are good
morpheme candidates. Nevertheless, the method stills needs to be revisited and
updated to allow for an unsupervized analysis of splinters and their classification as
morphemes.
42 As Kemmer [2006: 7-8] observes, “despite the interest they attract due to their creative
nature and their typological unusualness, lexical blends have been little more than a
footnote in the study of morphology in modern linguistics”. She interestingly notes
that “the amount of similar structure (in blends) can vary a great deal, so it is
impossible to state a general formal rule that will license some blends and exclude
others”. This peculiarity of blends, whose nature can only be described by positing
tendencies, does not find a place in traditional rule-based approaches to grammar. In
fact, Kemmer [2006: 9] argues that “it seems as though, instead of rules, speakers are
operating with a facility for global pattern-matching that allows similarities on many
different dimensions to count, as long as there are enough of them (with “enough” not
being precisely quantifiable)”. This vision may be linked to the fields of paradigmatic
morphology and construction grammar. Taylor [2012: 263] favours this interpretation
of blends, by stating that:
blending turns out to be a potent source of new expressions and new constructions
and thus offers itself as a serious alternative to the rule-based mechanisms of
generative theory
[…]
Previously encountered expressions, and the schematic constructions that they
instantiate, can be the source of new linguistic expressions. Speakers can introduce
variations to performed expressions, they can extend accepted usage patterns, and
they can blend existing resources to create hybrid expressions which inherit some
aspect of their inputs.
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 10
45 In any case, paradigmatic morphology is not restricted to the previous cases. It is also
concerned with the study of words that are orthographically, phonetically or
semantically related.
46 The concept of analogy has often been used by scholars, like Becker [1993] or Ardnt-
Lappe [2014] to illustrate cases where a new lexical unit is coined through comparison
with other words, as in the creation of deverbal adjectives ending in ‘-able’. Other
authors, like Burzio [1998], Steriade [2000] or Raffelsiefen [2004] use the terms
‘multiple correspondence’, ‘paradigmatic uniformity’ or ‘stem selection’, respectively,
to make reference to complex words with phonological properties influenced by groups
of related words. Bauer [2001: 76] describes that the principle of analogy in derivation
dictates that any new derivative is created provided there is “a suitable pattern for it to
be formed on”.
47 The process of blending, whose main characteristics have been described above, is hard
to describe from a syntagmatic point of view, and thus paradigmatic approaches seem
to be able to provide a more plausible explanation of it. Kemmer [2006] is one of the
first scholars to work on blending using this approach and explaining that rule-based
morphology is not adequate for a correct study of these formations. In Kemmer
[2006: 9], the scholar constructs her theory on the basis of the concept of schema,
which she defines as “a cognitive representation consisting of perceived similarities
across many instances of usage. Schemas are essentially routinized, or cognitively
entrenched, patterns of experience”. The researcher provides a detailed explanation of
schemas, signalling their most interesting features and their cognitive basis, and
linking their emergence to productivity. Kemmer [2006: 10] indicates that:
Schemas, being simply what two or more forms or meanings have in common, are
not restricted by the kinds of sequencing required by rules, nor are they restricted
to information of particular types or levels. Schemas allow for competing factors in
licensing expressions, and for multiple possible sanctioning structures, thus giving
rise to variation and to possible non-unique analyses for linguistic expressions.
And, importantly, schemas are sensitive to frequency: frequency measures
repetition of instances, which leads to conventionalization (cognitive
entrenchment and degree of dispersal in a group of speakers) which itself affects
the possibilities licensed by the system: instances of use, over time, shape the very
system that gives rise to them.
48 In addition, recent grammatical models belonging to Construction Grammar have
paved the way for the study of blends as constructions.
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 11
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 12
3. Methodology
60 The first step in the development of this work has been the creation of a corpus
containing words including the sequence ‘-gasm’. In order to do so, three different
online corpora have been used: the Global Web-Based English (GloWbE, available at
https://corpus.byu.edu/glowbe/), the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA,
available at https://corpus.byu.edu/coca/) and the English Web Corpus (EnTenTen2015,
accessible through the corpus management system SketchEngine: https://
www.sketchengine.eu/). The main reason for choosing these corpora has been their
size: EnTenTen2015 contains over 18 billion words, GloWbE includes more than 1.9
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 13
billion, and COCA is composed of 560 million words, making them three of the largest
online collections of words. The longevity of each of the corpora has been another
important factor, for the three of them have been updated and new words have been
added to them on a regular basis. In addition, another determining factor for choosing
the three previous tools has been their heterogeneous nature, as they comprise words
coming from a wide variety of sources. The GloWbE corpus, for instance, includes texts
from twenty different countries. Furthermore, all of them are made up of different
types of texts, from transcribed spoken pieces of language to academic texts.
Nevertheless, some other opportunistic sources have been used. The decision to do so
was based on the nature of the process of blending itself: due to the creative effects
that can be reached by using it, blends are generated with a very high frequency. The
majority of blends, however, do not become very popular and they are not often
included in the texts that form part of online language corpora, but rather they are
commonly found in social media. For that reason, some blends ending in ‘-gasm’ have
been taken from Twitter, blogs and newspapers’ websites and even online discussion
threads consulted randomly. Some examples of blends coming from these sources are
Gagasm ( Gaga + (or)gasm, meaning ‘a state of excitement or pleasure produced by
listening to music by Lady Gaga) or Swirllgasm (Swirll + (or)gasm, meaning ‘a state of
extreme pleasure as a result of eating Swirll yoghurt).
61 The same procedure was followed to extract words containing the element ‘-gasm’ from
GloWbE and COCA. I introduced the sequence “*gasm” under the List label, in order to
obtain all the words where any type of material preceded ‘-gasm’. I changed the search
options to allow the corpora to display up to 500 results, in case there were more words
than expected containing the suffixoid element. Additionally, the search options were
set to obtain all words with a minimum frequency of one token. Given the nature of the
process of blending itself, it is often difficult to find many instances of a single word. In
fact, the existence of hapax legomena (only one token for word in a corpus) is an
indicator of the productivity of the process, which is a very useful point of departure
for this work. As regards the EnTenTen2015 corpus, I accessed it through SketchEngine
and searched for the words using the Word List tool. I changed the default filter options
to only list words containing ‘gasm’ by introducing the command “.*gasm”, and I
changed the minimum frequency of appearance to one token, for the reasons explained
above. Once they had been retrieved, the words were revised in order to avoid any
confusion, since the corpus tools occasionally provided variations of the same word,
mainly linked to their spellings, with many lexemes written as the hyphenated variants
of others. Such is the case of geek-gasm, which was listed as a different word from
geekgasm. In these cases, the different variants were subsumed under a single lexeme,
and the number of tokens of each were put together. Moreover, some words were
discarded, since they lacked a context in the corpora or the context was a sequence of
seemingly random words that showed signs of having been automatically coined by
advertisement tools. Some other words containing neoclassical elements, like ‘mega’ or
‘micro’, were also excluded, as they remain closer to affixation in nature than to lexical
blending, although others, such as cyborgasm, were kept, due to their dubious nature (it
could have taken “cybernetic” as its source word, as opposed to the neoclassical
element ‘cyber’ on its own). After following the aforementioned steps, 131 words
ending in ‘-gasm’ were obtained from EnTenTen2015. GloWbE delivered 61 words,
whereas COCA provided me with 13. On many occasions, the same word was listed in
the three corpora, so the total amount of different words containing ‘-gasm’, taking
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 14
into account the combined results of the three corpora, is 173. Six more words were
taken from the other sources, which added to the rest made up a corpus of 179
neologisms. In order to measure their productivity, the words extracted from the
online corpora were listed in a table, to quantify the number of tokens for each and
reach any conclusions.
62 Subsequently, the source words of all the blends subject to study were identified and a
structural analysis was carried out with the intention of determining the type of bases
to which ‘-gasm’ is attached, as well as the possible variations of the sequence ‘-gasm’.
The number of syllables of the first source words and the resulting new blends were
computed. As regards the semantic analysis of the output words, several factors were
taken into account. The first stage in their classification was to contextualize the
words. For that aim, an instance of each of the words used in a wider context was
recovered using the corpus tools that enabled the compilation of the corpus. When no
context could be recovered (in cases where the word appeared in isolation, or was a
part of an advertisement, among other reasons), I used other resources, such as Urban
Dictionary (https://www.urbandictionary.com), an online dictionary where users can
upload new words, to obtain definitions or sentences including the words I was
interested in. Additionally, a definition for each of the words was searched. The source
of each definition is listed with the examples. When no definition could be retrieved
from the web, I provided my own definition of the word ending in ‘-gasm’ based on the
context.
63 Taking into account the source words of the blends and the context in which they
appeared, I proceeded to analyze them in terms of their semantics, according to the
relationships existing between the first and the second component of the novel
coinages. The relationships between the source words of the blends were studied
according to different factors, such as the notion of causality, the syntactic behaviour
of the source words and the semantic roles fulfilled by the said source words. All the
words that exhibited a similar behaviour were grouped under the same label and a
constructional approach based on the existence of schemas and subschemas was used
to account for these formations. The use of schemas to explain the creation of the
blends was based on Booij’s [2010] work.
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 15
however, if all the words have been directly modelled upon orgasm or whether some of
them have been coined by analogy with other words ending in ‘-gasm’ different from
orgasm. The present case study suggests the idea that new lexemes are in fact created
taking other blends ending in ‘-gasm’ as their input. The notion of schemas and
subschemas might also be potentially used to account for these creations. For the aims
of this study, the words whose token frequency is quite low are very interesting,
especially those whose frequency is of one word only. These are hapax legomena. If we
consider each of the three corpora separately, we find that there are 55 hapax
legomena in the EnTenTen2015, 34 in GloWbE, and 11 in COCA. If we only take into
account the words which are simultaneously instances of hapax legomena in the three
corpora (or in one of them, if the new lexeme is not included in the others), we find 88
cases. As we discussed above, hapax legomena are an indicator of high productivity.
The existence of such a big number of hapax legomena for words ending in ‘-gasm’ is
therefore an indicator that this splinter is quite productive, as it is attached very
regularly to new bases to coin new words. This finding supports several approaches to
the nature of splinters. On the one hand, it fits the idea that these elements are subject
to morphemization. The sequence ‘-gasm’ might be interpreted as an emergent
derivational morpheme, as its occurrence with a wide variety of bases has been proven
to be possible. On the other hand, the data also supports the appropriateness of using a
constructional approach to account for the nature of these elements. The existence of
many hapax legomena may indicate that a schema based on actual words containing ‘-
gasm’ has been developed in the mind of speakers.
66 The previous results might serve as a possible indicator of the autonomy of the splinter
‘-gasm’, which could be used to create new blends without directly taking orgasm as
their second source word.
67 This section is concerned with the analysis of the structural properties of the words in
my corpus, which have been created on the basis of orgasm. The first thing that has
drawn my attention in their study has been the fact that there are some variations of
the splinter used to coin new words. Although the main realization of this sequence is ‘-
gasm’, this splinter changes to ‘-ogasm’ on some occasions. A few words are formed by
attaching the whole form orgasm, instead of the back-clipped sequence ‘-gasm’, and
others contain the sequence ‘-agasm’.
68 The words taking orgasm to create new words seem to have been directly coined on the
basis of the original word, in its full form. The majority of them are cases where we find
both graphemic and phonetic overlap, that is, some material is shared by both the first
source word involved in the blend and the term orgasm. Such is the case of carnivorgasm
(carnivore + orgasm), explorgasm (explorer + orgasm), floorgasm (floor + orgasm), gorgasm
(gore + orgasm), horrorgasm (horror + orgasm), horgasm (horticulture + orgasm), morgasm
(more + orgasm), prorgasm (programmer + orgasm), schizorgasm (schizophrenia + orgasm),
and snoorgasm (snooze + orgasm). However, we also find some cases of blends including
the whole word ‘orgasm’ where there is no overlap. These words are cyborgasm
(possibly cybernetic + orgasm), femaleorgasm (female + orgasm) and Obamaorgasm (Obama +
orgasm). The reason why these words take the whole form of the second source word is
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 16
unclear, especially in the case of the two last words, for which the alternative versions
femgasm and Obamagasm can be found, respectively. One possible explanation is that the
speaker who has coined these words wants to highlight the fact that the new blends are
directly linked to the word orgasm. All these words, therefore, seem to have been
created as novel blends, taking orgasm as their second source word, as opposed to being
formed by the addition of a splinter.
69 The group of words containing ‘-agasm’ instead of ‘-gasm’ do not serve as an indicator
of the existence of ‘-agasm’ as a variant of ‘-gasm’, for the grapheme ‘a’ is part of each
of the source words. They simply reflect the situation in which ‘-gasm’ is attached to
clipped versions of source words ending in ‘-a’ before the new blends are formed. Seven
words conform this group: Berbagasm (Berbatov + -gasm), cameragasm (camera + -gasm),
exploragasm (exploration + -gasm), extravagasm (extravagant + -gasm), ideagasm (idea + -
gasm), Obamagasm (Obama + -gasm), and operagasm (opera + -gasm).
70 However, ‘-ogasm’ seems to behave like a real variant of ‘-gasm’ in some words, like
luxogasm (luxury + -ogasm) or delish-o-gasm (delish + -o-gasm). Given the context in which
‘-ogasm’ is attached in these cases, one possible explanation for this variant is the need
for vocalic support, as the splinter ‘-gasm’ is attached to a (sporadically) clipped base
consisting of several final consonants. The addition of the vowel ‘o’ before the splinter
could be due to the attempt to avoid the creation of a very long consonantic cluster.
Another possibility is the use of this linking element by analogy with many neoclassical
compounds.
71 As regards the length of the words ending in ‘-gasm’, two things have been taken into
account, namely the length of the bases to which the splinter is attached (the first
source word of all the new blends) and the length of the novel blends themselves.
72 In relation to the length of the first source words, ‘-gasm’ is combined with bases of one
syllable in 54.50% of the cases (97 out of 178 words), as in artgasm (the first source word
being ‘art’). It is attached to 50 bases of two syllables, as in papergasm (accounting for a
28.09% of the cases), 23 bases of three syllables, as in Obamagasm (12.92% of the total), 7
bases of four syllables, as in literarygasm (3.93%) and one base of five syllables (0.56%),
electrogasm, whose first source word is ‘electricity’.
73 Concerning the length of the new blends, we find 106 new lexemes with two syllables,
like eargasm, accounting for a 59.55% of the corpus, 51 three-syllable blends, such as
drawergasm (28.65%), and 19 words with four syllables, like cameragasm (10.67% of the
cases). In addition to these preferred patterns, we also find 2 blends with five syllables,
literarygasm and Obamaorgasm (accounting for 1.12% of the cases).
74 The previous distribution is not surprising at all, for, as I mentioned in the revision of
the literature, one of the most important aspects of lexical blending is the degree of
similarity between the blend and its source words, as well as the recognizability of the
source words that constitute a blend. These results, consequently, go in accordance
with previous research by Lehrer [1996] and Gries [2004b]. As mentioned above, the
most frequent pattern for words ending in ‘–gasm’ is that where the sequence is added
to a monosyllabic case to create a disyllabic word. This makes perfect sense, and it is, in
fact, a rather ideal situation, since these output blends preserve their first source words
in their totality, making them highly recognizable. Furthermore, by using monosyllabic
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 17
words as the first element in the blends, speakers mirror the length of the original
word orgasm, and reproduce the syllabic pattern in their new creations.
75 The analysis of the relationship existing between the two elements in each blend (the
first source word and the sequence ‘-gasm’, coming from orgasm) has enabled me to
distinguish different categories whose characteristics I will present below. Although
some of the words in the corpus do not fit into any of these groups, given their lack of a
sufficient context so as to determine the relation between the words in a precise way,
the majority of the blends can be classified using these categories, namely cause-and-
effect blends, experiencer blends, coordination blends, predication blends and
adjectival blends. All these groups are described in this section, and detailed examples
of each group are provided.
76 I have labelled this group of words as ‘cause and effect blends’ because the relationship
between the two source words in each blend is based on this notion. All the lexemes
contained in this group follow the same pattern: the first source word is used as the
cause which provokes an effect in a person (an orgasm, a feeling of pleasure or
excitement). On the basis of the study conducted in this work, most words ending in ‘-
gasm’ seem to belong to this category, since cause and effect appears to be the most
common relation between their constituents. 125 words out of 178 in the corpus exhibit
this property, accounting for 70.22% of the total. The first source word of these blends
is always a noun. We only find 4 cases which do not conform to this generalization,
namely chillgasm (whose first source is a verb), cutegasm (adjective), gamingasm (verb)
and scoregasm (verb). The nature of the nouns involved in the formation of the blends,
however, is varied, including common nouns, such as food in foodgasm, proper nouns,
such as Bieber in Bievergasm or abstract nouns, like fear in feargasm.
77 Additionally, another characteristic of this group of blends is the fact that their first
source tends to be used metonymically, that is, standing for something else, as will be
explained below. This property can be seen in words like heartgasm, where ‘heart’ does
not stand for a body organ, but rather for ‘love’, or bookgasm, where ‘book’ does not
stand for an actual copy of a book, but for the activity of reading a book instead.
78 An exhaustive semantic analysis of the words in this category has showed that two
more specific groups can be distinguished, based on the specificity in meaning of the
sequence ‘-gasm’. Although this constituent expresses an effect in all of the blends, we
may find a slight variation in the meaning that the original second source word orgasm
takes in the resulting blends. Thus, one group of words seem to replicate the original
meaning of orgasm. In these words, the second element, which designates the effect, is
used with the meaning ‘physical or bodily pleasure’. In a second group of blends the
meaning of ‘-gasm’ appears to deviate from the original meaning In these words, the
second element of the blend means ‘a feeling of excitement or enthusiasm’.
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 18
79 As has been mentioned above, the words in these groups follow the cause-and-effect
pattern, where ‘-gasm’ is the effect and stands for the original meaning of orgasm, that
is, physical or bodily pleasure (related to, or provoked by the first element of the
blend).
80 The theory of Construction Morphology, proposed by Geert Booij, seems to provide the
necessary tools to explain the formation of these words based on the idea of schemas.
In fact, the creation of this group of blends may be explained by means of the following
schema:
<[[X]Ni gasm]Nj ↔ [A sensation of physical or bodily pleasure produced by SEMi]j>
81 It is important to note that the first word in this schema is also semantically variable,
as in some cases it consists of concrete entity (footgasm) while in others, it is an activity
(yogasm).
82 The majority of words in the previous group seem to be metonymic. More precisely, it
is in the first source word where metonymy appears to be at work. The most common
metonymy in these cases is that of a participant for the action or the activity in which
that participant is involved. This can be seen in cases like footgasm, where foot has the
semantic role of patient or locative, participating in the action ‘massage on foot’.
Metonymy can also be considered to be at work in cases like yogasm, although it is not
as evident as in footgasm, since the first source word of the former refers directly to an
activity, that is, the degree of contiguity between the concepts is higher.
83 The word foodgasm, included in the previous list, illustrates another group of words
that share a semantic property. Foodgasm makes reference to the feeling of pleasure one
gets when eating something. An example of the word in use is the following: “One of
the diners at an adjacent table had a noisy foodgasm over this dessert, so we tried it on
our second visit” (www.magoguide.net). (EnTenTen15).
84 Using the theoretical framework of Construction Morphology, the subschema resulting
from the word foodgasm can be described as follows:
<[[x]Ni gasm]Nj ↔ [A sensation of physical or bodily pleasure produced by eating or
drinking SEMi]j>
85 In a different group of words in the corpus, the sequence ‘-gasm’ does not reproduce
the original meaning of orgasm, but a slight variation. This element is used with the
meaning of ‘a feeling of excitement or enthusiasm’, produced by the first element of
the blend.
86 Following the framework of Construction Morphology, the following schema can be
used to account for these coinages:
<[[X]Ni gasm]Nj ↔ [A feeling of excitement or enthusiasm produced by SEMi]j>
87 In addition, these words have something in common with the blends in the previous
group: metonymy is also at work in the first element of many of these words. In many
cases, therefore, the feeling of excitement is not caused by the entity denoted by the
first word, but by the activity in which that entity participates instead. In TVgasm, for
instance, the feeling of excitement is not caused by a television as an object, but rather
by the activity of watching something one loves on television.
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 19
88 As in the group of blends where ‘-gasm’ means ‘physical or bodily pleasure’, in this
second group, where ‘-gasm’ stands for a ‘feeling of excitement or enthusiasm’, we find
a case which is semantically more specific and has probably paved the way for
subsequent creations.
89 Eargasm makes reference to a feeling of maximal enthusiasm or excitement
experienced when listening to music. The word audiogasm can also be considered as the
origin of other creations, as it stands for the feeling of excitement experienced when
listening to an audio track one particularly loves.
90 Using the principles of Construction Morphology, the new subschema can be accounted
for as follows:
<[[X]Ni gasm]Nj ↔ [A feeling of excitement or enthusiasm produced by listening to
music by / the sound of SEMi]j>
91 This second order schema presents a higher degree of specificity at the semantic level.
All the words created on the basis of this subschema maintain the meaning of the
general schema, while expanding on it and specifying that the feeling of enthusiasm is
produced by the activity of listening to a specific type of music, the sound of an
instrument or a song by a singer.
92 The reason why I have labelled this group of blends as ‘experiencer blends’ is that the
relationship between their source words is such that the first source word has the
semantic role of experiencer, that is, an entity that is aware of or is affected by the
action or state denoted by a predicate, the second source word. It is important to draw
a distinction between an agent and an experiencer at this point, since the agent is the
participant that instigates an action. For this reason, the first elements of these blends
should not be confused with elements fulfilling the role of agent, for they are entities
that are affected by the feeling of pleasure described by the second element, but do not
have control of it. As expected, the first source words of all the words that constitute
this group are nouns (some of them proper names). These blends can be paraphrased as
“(an) X has/experiences an orgasm/pleasure”.
93 The cases of experiencer blends in our corpus account for 11.80% of the data, with 21
words characterized by this feature out of the 178 subject to study. Although they form
a small group if compared with ‘cause and effect’ blends, they are part of the second
biggest group that has been identified.
94 Following the theory of Construction Morphology, a general schema for the creation of
words that follow this pattern could be represented as follows:
<[[X]Ni gasm]Nj ↔ [A feeling of pleasure or excitement experienced by SEMi]j>
95 Lower-level schemas also seem to operate in the case of experiencer blends, as we find
two clearly distinguished groups: one of them consisting of blends with initial proper
nouns, and another one with common nouns. These subschemas, which differ in the
semantics of the first element constituting the blend, are represented below.
<[[X]PNi gasm]Nj ↔ [A feeling of pleasure or excitement experienced by SEMi]j>
96 In this case, PN stands for the semantic specificity of the nouns that are used to create
the new words, that is, proper nouns.
<[[X]CNi gasm]Nj ↔ [A feeling of pleasure or excitement experienced by SEMi]j>
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 20
97 In the second case, CN stands for common noun, as the first source word of the
formations coined through this schema are semantically different from the ones which
originate from the previous subschema.
98 This group has been named ‘coordination blends’ because the source words of the
blends stand in a relationship of coordination. This group is restricted to only 7 words
out of the 178 in the corpus, accounting for a 3.93% of the total. Despite its small size, it
is an interesting pattern, as it consists of words which describe the situation in which a
feeling of pleasure or excitement and an additional sensation are experienced together
by a person.
99 Following the principles of Construction Morphology, the schema explaining the
creation of words of this nature is expressed below.
<[[X]Ni gasm]Nj ↔ [A feeling of pleasure or excitement experienced together with
(a feeling of) SEMi]j>
100 Although this group is not as clear-cut as the three previous categories, we find some
words that have been formed by blending an adjective as their first source word and
the word orgasm. In these cases, the word orgasm seems to maintain its full original
meaning, or at least it is acknowledged as the direct second source word for the blend,
and the first source words behave as premodifiers, attributing some qualities to the
feeling of pleasure experienced by a person. In fact, these blends seem to behave like
phrases and can be written as such. For that reason, all these words seem to have a
semantic head, corresponding to the second source word. Six cases of words following
this pattern can be found in the corpus, accounting for a 3.37% of the total.
101 A general schema explaining the formation of the blends could be the following:
<[[X]Ai gasm]Nj ↔ [An orgasm of the nature described by SEMi]j>
102 Only one word has been found in the corpus to support the existence of this group. For
that reason, it is unclear whether more words have been formed following this pattern
or if some others will be coined in the future. However, the case found in the data is
quite interesting, as the first source word is used as a predicate of orgasm. The word
that exhibits this characteristic is artgasm. We could simplify the analysis in the
absence of a surrounding context by saying that this word is an instance of a ‘cause and
effect’ blend, where ‘art’ stands for ‘the activity of admiring a work of art’. However,
the context where the word appears favours a different interpretation.
(3) Artgasm. “The paper presents the Artgasm project that stimulates its
participants into orgasm. The orgasm was physically induced to volunteer
participants through a specialized, medical crafted “orgasmotron” and
mediated to the audience through real time video, projected onto a large
screen outside the performance space. With the help of qualified medical
personnel, the project manipulates its male audience/participants to
experience the maximum corporal pleasure, i.e. orgasm. In this manner, the
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 21
103 As can be observed, the meaning of the word when used in this context is ‘the
consideration of an orgasm as being a work of art’. Furthermore, the blend could be
paraphrased as ‘An orgasm is art’, where we can see very clearly that ‘art’ is a subject
predicate, attributing qualities to orgasm.
104 Some other words in the corpus have been left out. The reason for this has been the
difficulty at establishing the relationship between their source words. On many
occasions, this difficulty is due to the lack of an appropriate context.
105 This section aims at summarizing the schemas described in this study, which seem to
be used by speakers in the creation of new words. All of them result in the formation of
blended words ending in ‘-gasm’.
106 Some blends show a relationship of cause and effect between their source words. The
words that behave in this way are instantiations of the following schemas:
(1) <[[X]Ni gasm]Nj ↔ [A sensation of physical or bodily pleasure produced by
SEMi]j>
(2) <[[X]Ni gasm]Nj ↔ [A feeling of excitement or enthusiasm produced by SEMi]j>
107 The main difference between the schemas in (1) and (2) is the precise meaning of the
resulting feeling triggered by the cause. While this is a feeling of physical of bodily
pleasure in the first case, it is actually a feeling of excitement or enthusiasm in the
second. An example of a word created by means of the schema in (1) is toygasm. The
word neologasm, on the other hand, is an instantiation of the schema in (2).
108 In addition, lower-level schemas have been identified for both cases. They are
represented as follows:
(1.1.) <[[x]Ni gasm]Nj ↔ [A sensation of physical or bodily pleasure produced by
eating or drinking SEMi]j>
(2.1.) <[[X]Ni gasm]Nj ↔ [A feeling of excitement or enthusiasm produced by
listening to music by / the sound of SEMi]j>
109 Each of the subschemas presented above differ from their general schemas in the
degree of semantic specificity of the causing entity. In (1.1.), the cause resulting in a
pleasurable effect is the activity of eating or drinking something, as can be seen in
beefgasm, while in (2.1.), the cause is differently specified, and is restricted to cases
where the feeling of excitement is produced by the activity of listening to a specific
type of music or sound, as in guitargasm.
110 In other blends, like clowngasm, the first participant fulfils the semantic role of an
experiencer, that is, the first participant experiences the feeling of pleasure. The
constructional schema accounting for these words is the following:
(3) <[[X]Ni gasm]Nj ↔ [A feeling of pleasure or excitement experienced by SEMi]j>
111 Two subschemas can be found within the group of experiencer blends, whose main
difference is the nature of the first source word. As represented below, the first source
word is a proper noun in (3.1.), as in Horgasm, while it is a common noun in (3.2.), as in
geekgasm.
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 22
5. Conclusion
114 The present study has proved that the splinter ‘-gasm’ is very productive. It is included
in a huge list of words and many of these words are cases of hapax legomena in the
corpus used, that is, words that appear with the minimum possible frequency in a
corpus. This is an indicator that novel words containing ‘-gasm’ are created regularly
by speakers, who seem to use the sequence quite naturally expecting other language
users to recognize and understand their coinages.
115 The semantic analysis of the relationships between the blends’ source words has
allowed for the classification of blends in different categories. In this way, I have
distinguished blends that are based on a relationship of causality from the rest. Within
this group, two situations are found: in some of them, the splinter seems to maintain
the meaning of the original word it comes from. In others, however, the meaning of the
splinter presents slight variations from the original one. Another group of blends is
characterized by a first source word with the semantic role of experiencer, an entity
that is affected by a feeling of pleasure or excitement, denoted by the sequence ‘-gasm’.
In addition, some blends seem to have been formed by means of coordination. In these
words, we cannot identify a semantic head, as both source words seem to be equally
important. Furthermore, these words denote a feeling of pleasure or excitement
accompanied by another feeling. Blends formed by an adjective followed by ‘-gasm’
seem to form another category, as their semantic behaviour is constant, with the
adjectives in all the words acting as premodifiers of the meaning of ‘-gasm’ (pleasure or
excitement). Some other words could be considered to form other minor groups or be a
part of the previously described ones, but the corpus does not contain sufficient data to
set up new groups.
116 As opposed to purely concatenative approaches to morphology, Construction
Morphology has proved to be an appropriate tool to account for these formations. The
use of schemas and subschemas appears to be very useful to explain the formation of
the blends in the corpus, as well as the differences between them.
117 Future research should attempt to find more differentiated groups of blends according
to the nature of their source words. Moreover, they should study other cases of blend
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 23
splinters to check whether the same patterns that have been described in this work can
be identified in blends containing other sequences.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ADAMS Valerie, 1973, Introduction to Modern English Word-Formation, London: Longman.
ALGEO John, 1977, “Blends, a structural and systematic view”, American Speech 52, Durham: Duke
University Press, 47-64.
ARDNT-LAPPE Sabine, 2014, “Analogy in suffix rivalry: the case of English –ity and -ness”, English
Language and Linguistics, 18(3), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 537-568.
ARDNT-LAPPE Sabine & PLAG Ingo, 2013, “The role of prosodic structure in the formation of English
blends”, English Language and Linguistics, 17(3), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 537-563.
BAUER Laurie, 2006, “Compounds and minor word-Formation types”, in AARTS Bas & MCMAHON April
(Eds.), The Handbook of English Linguistics, Hoboken, New Jersey: Blackwell, 483-506.
BAUER Laurie, LIEBER Rochelle & PLAG Ingo, 2013, The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology,
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BELIAEVA Natalia, 2014, “A study of English blends: From structure to meaning and back again”, in
PASTER Mary, RAINER Franz, SPENCER Andrew & STUMP Greg (Eds.), Word Structure, 7, Edinburgh:
Edinburgh University Press, 29-54.
BERMAN J.M., 1961, “Contribution on Blending”, Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 9,
Germany: Walter De Gruyter, 278-281.
BOOIJ Geert, 2015, “Construction Morphology”, in HIPPISLEY Andrew & STUMP Gregory (Eds.), The
Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 424-448.
BURZIO Luigi, 1998, “Multiple correspondence”, Lingua, 104(1), Amsterdam: Elsevier, 79-109.
CANNON Garland, 1986, “Blends in English word formation”, Linguistics, 24, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 725-753.
CANNON Garland, 2000, “Blending”, in BOOIJ Geert, LEHMANN Christian & MUGDAN Joachim (Eds.),
Morphology: An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-Formation, Berlin and New York:
Walter de Gruyter, 952-956.
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 24
CORREIA SAAVEDRA David, 2014, “Automatically identifying blend splinters that are morpheme
candidates”, Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 31(1), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 55-71.
CRYSTAL David, 1995, The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of the English Language, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
FANDRYCH Ingrid, 2008, “Sub-morphemic elements in the formation of acronyms, blends and
clippings”, Lexis, 2, 103-121.
FAUCONNIER Gilles & TURNER Mark, 1998, “Conceptual integration networks”, Cognitive Science, 22(2),
133-187.
FAUCONNIER Gilles & TURNER Mark, 2002, The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden
Complexities, New York: Basic Books.
FISCHER Roswitha, 1998, Lexical Change in Present Day English: A Corpus Based Study of the Motivation,
Institutionalization, and Productivity of Creative Neologisms, Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
GEERAERTS Dirk & CUYCKENS Hubert, 2007, The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
GOLDBERG Adele E., 1995, Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure,
Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.
GOLDBERG Adele E., 1998, “Patterns of experience in patterns of language”, in TOMASELLO Michael
(Ed.), The New Psychology of Language (Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure), Vol.
1, Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 203-219.
GOLDBERG Adele E., 1998, “Construction grammar”, in NADEL Lynn (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive
science, London: MacMillan.
GOLDBERG Adele E., 1995, Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language, Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
GRIES Stephan Th., 2004a, “Isn’t that Fantabulous? How Similarity Motivates Intentional
Morphological Blends in English”, in ACHARD Michel & KEMMER Suzanne (Eds.), Language, Culture,
and Mind, Stanford: CSLI Publications, 415-428.
GRIES Stepha Th., 2004b, “Shouldn’t it be breakfunch? A quantitative analysis of blend structure
in English”, Linguistics, 42, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 639-667.
HILPERT Martin, 2014, Construction Grammar and its application to English, Edinburgh: Edinburgh
University Press.
KELLY Michael H., 1998, “To “brunch” or to “brench”: some aspects of blend structure”, Linguistics,
36(3), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 579-590.
KEMMER Suzanne, 2006, “Schemas and lexical blends”, in CUYCKENS Hubert, BERG Thomas, DIRVEN
René & PANTHER Klaus-Uwe (Eds.), Motivation in Language: From Case Grammar to Cognitive Linguistics.
A Festschrift for Günter Radden, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 69-97.
LALIC-KRSTIN Gordana, 2014, “Forms and meanings of the source word Armageddon in English
lexical blends”, in PRĆIĆ Tvrtko et al. (Eds.), Engleski jezik i anglofone književnosti u teoriji i praksi:
Zbornik u čast Draginji Pervaz, Filozofski fakultet: Novi Sad, 257-273.
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 25
LEHRER Adrienne, 1998, “Scapes, holics and thons: The semantics of English combining forms”,
American Speech, 73(1), Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 3-28.
LEHRER Adrienne, 2007, “Blendalicious”, in MUNAT Judith (Ed.), Lexical Creativity, Texts and Contexts,
Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 115-133.
LÓPEZ-RÚA Paula, 2002, “On the Structure of Acronyms and Neighbouring Categories: a Prototype-
based Account”, English Language and Linguistics, 6(1), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
31-60.
PLAG Ingo & BAAYEN Harald, 2009, “Suffix ordering and morphological processing”, in CARLSTON
Greg & STUMP Gregory (Eds.), Language, 85(1), New York: Linguistic Society of America, 109-152.
POND Louise, 1914, Blends: Their Relation to English Word Formation, Heidelberg: Winter.
RADDEN Gunter & DIRVEN René, 2007, Cognitive English Grammar, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John
Benjamins.
SCHREUDER Robert & BAAYEN Harald, 1997, “How complex simple words can be”, Journal of Memory
and Language, 37, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 118-139.
SOUDANEK L.J., 1998, “The Relation of Blending to English Word-Formation: Theory, Structure, and
Typological Attempts”, in DRESSLER Wolfgang & MEID Wolfgang (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth
International Congress of Linguists: Vienna, August 28-September 2, 1977, Innsbruck: Institut für
Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck, 462-466.
STERIADE Donca, 2000, “Paradigm uniformity and the phonetics-phonology boundary”, in BROE M.
& PIERREHUMBERT J. (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology V: Acquisition and the lexicon, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 313-334.
TAYLOR John R., 2012, The Mental Corpus: How Language is Represented in the Mind, Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
UNGERER Friedrich & SCHMID Hans-Jörg, 1996, An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics, London:
Longman.
APPENDIXES
Appendix 1
Table 1: Frequency of the words ending in –gasm in the corpora
FREQUENCY
Afrigasm 4 6
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 26
Allahgasm 1
Amerigasm 1
Artgasm 8
Asianporngasm 1
Assgasm 5
Astrogasm 1
Audiogasm 7
Aurgasm 419
Bassgasm 10
Bedgasm 1
Beefgasm 1
Beergasm 1
Berbagasm 3
Berlinergasm 5
Biebergasm 1 1
Blissgasm 1
Blogasm 7
Bookgasm 10 5
Bootygasm 1
Braingasm 4
Breathgasm 2
Cakegasm 2
Cameragasm 1
Cargasm 1 2
Carnivorgasm 1
Chartgasm 1
Chillgasm 1
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 27
Chocgasm 2
Chocogasm 4
Choirgasm 1
Christgasm 1
Clowngasm 2
Colbertgasm 1
Coregasm 4 1
Crabgasm 1
Crygasm 3
Cutegasm 1
Cyborgasm 6
Dancegasm 1
Deathgasm 94
Debtgasm 1
Deli-gasm 1
Delish-o-gasm 1
Designgasm 2
Drawergasm 1
Dreamgasm 1
Eargasm 122 17
Electrogasm 1
Exploragasm 1
Explorgasm 2
Extravagasm 2
Eyegasm 17 1
Factgasm 3
Failgasm 1
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 28
Fangasm 65 3 1
Fashiongasm 1
Feargasm 1
Femaleorgasm 18
Femgasm 6
Femmegasm 3
Flavourgasm 1
Floorgasm 2
Foodgasm 114 14
Footgasm 1
Forevergasm 1
Fruitgasm 1 2
Gamegasm 1
Gamingasm 1
Gastronogasm 1
Geekgasm 37 4 1
Goalgasm 2 1
Googasm 2
Goregasm 7 2
Gorgasm 11
Guitargasm 1
Heartgasm 4
Hentaigasm 2
Herogasm 8
Horrorgasm 2
Horgasm 2
Hortgasm 2
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 29
Ideagasm 1
Infogasm 2
Internetgasm 1
Joygasm 12 4
Ladygasm 86
Lashgasm 5
Leathergasm 1
Lesbigasm 1
Lightning-gasm 1
Literarygasm 1
Luxogasm 1
Macgasm 61 9
Mapgasm 1
Mangasm 60
Meatgasm 6
Metalgasm 1
Mindgasm 6 1
Moneygasm 1
Mooregasm 6
Moregasm 43 4
Morgasm 23 1
Mouthgasm 12 3
Mustangasm 1
Neologasm 2
Nerdgasm 139 30 1
Newsgasm 5
Nipplegasm 1
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 30
Noisegasm 11
Obamagasm 17 2
Obamaorgasm 1
Operagasm 8
Orbgasm 1
Orchidgasm 1
Oreogasm 2
Orgygasm 1
Oxtailgasm 1
Papergasm 3
Photogasm 2
Pinkgasm 1
Plankgasm 1
Plantgasm 1
Polishgasm 1
Popgasm 4
Porkgasm 1
Porngasm 17
Prayergasm 3
Prorgasm 2
Pyrogasm 1
Queergasm 1
Ragegasm 2
Releasegasm 1
Rockgasm 1
Scenerygasm 1
Schizorgasm 1
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 31
Scoregasm 3
Sexgasm 1
Shoegasm 1
Showgasm 7
Skygasm 1
Snoorgasm 1
Snoregasm 1
Soapgasm 1
Soulgasm 18
Soundgasm 1156
Sportsgasm 1
Squeegasm 6 2
Storygasm 7
Studygasm 1
Stylegasm 1
Suregasm 1
Tabloidgasm 1
Tastegasm 1
Thoughtgasm 1
Tintingasm 2
Torygam 7
Tourgasm 11 2 1
Toygasm 1
Trigasm 1
TVgasm 2 1
Twittergasm 1
Vampiregasm 1
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 32
Vetogasm 2
Vowelgasm 1
Wargasm 32 2 4
Whoregasm 4
Winegasm 1
Wordgasm 1
Yawgasm 1
Yawngasm 7
Yogasm 1
Appendix 2
Table 2: Cause and effect blends where ‘-gasm’ means ‘physical or bodily pleasure’
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 33
An orgasmic feeling obtained when “Megan footgasms when I rub her feet nice
Footgasm
getting a very good foot massage. and hard” (UrbanDictionary).
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 34
An orgasm experienced when using “Toygasm! “The Insider’s Guide to Sex Toys
Toygasm
sex toys for stimulation. and Techniques” (COCA).
Appendix 3
Pleasure obtained by eating a “Walk in, get a table pretty easily, and be prepared
Crabgasm
crustaceous. to have a crabgasm” (www.ohjoy.blogs.com).
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 35
Pleasure derived from eating a “Judy just had a Fruitgasm from that piece of
Fruitgasm
piece of fruit. watermelon!” (UrbanDictionary)
Appendix 4
Table 4: Cause and effect blends where ‘-gasm’ means ‘a feeling of excitement or enthusiasm’
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 36
A feeling of enthusiasm
“Afrigasms feel as good as they do because they confirm
experienced when dealing
Afrigasm the way media . . . taught us to view the continent”
with or watching images from
(www.vijana.fm). Taken from EnTenTen15.
Africa.
“Having intense joy or passion “Listening to Toby Keith’s song “Courtesy of the Red,
Amerigasm upon extreme patriotism for White, & Blue (The Angry American)” gave me an
the U.S” (UrbanDictionary). Amerigasm” (UrbanDictionary)
“The feeling you get when you “Dude, last night I wrote a new blog post about that
check your blog stats and you crazy new action movie. This morning when I checked
Blogasm
see way more visitors than you my stats and saw I had over 2,000 visits, I had a serious
expected” (UrbanDictionary). blogasm!” (UrbanDictionary).
Feeling of enthusiasm
“Bookgasm – reading material to get excited about”
Bookgasm experienced when reading a
(www.netfacet.net). Taken from EnTenTen15.
book.
Feeling of enthusiasm “If you really want to have a cameragasm have him take
Cameragasm experienced when using a you up to the pro floor and take a look at the Hassys”
camera to take pictures. (www.shutterstock.com). Taken from GloWbE.
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 37
“A strong feeling of
excitement brought on by
anything dark or of death, “That necrophile creep had a deathgasm in the morgue
Deathgasm
such as music and art felt by looking at all those bodies” (UrbanDictionary).
death enthusiasts”
(UrbanDictionary).
A feeling of maximal
“I nearly had an eargasm while listening to his
enthusiasm or excitement
Eargasm performance of Rachmaninoff’s Second Piano
experienced when listening to
Concerto” (UrbanDictionary).
music.
A feeling of excitement or
“New York’s Times Square has always been an eyegasm
enthusiasm when seeing
Eyegasm of advertising” (www.ringofstars.ru). Taken from
something overwhelmingly
EnTenTen15.
beautiful.
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 38
A feeling of excitement of
“When playing Command and Conquer 3 it sounded
enthusiasm given by the visual
Gamegasm and looked so good I had a gamegasm”
components, aesthetics, or
(UrbanDictionary).
contents of a game.
Probably a feeling of
excitement when facing
Horrorgasm
horror-related things or
activities.
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 39
A feeling of excitement
“Holy cow that is such a good idea!!! I think I just had
Ideagasm produced by having a
an ideagasm” (UrbanDictionary).
wonderful idea.
A feeling of excitement
“Why does it feel so good just to answer and delete
Internetgasm produced by surfing the
emails? #internetgasm” (Twitter).
Internet.
The feeling one gets when “I’m intoxicated by the smell of real leather and
Leathergasm admiring a beautiful leather fascinated by the rawness of handmade leather goods.
work. #leathergasm” (Twitter).
Excitement or enthusiasm
Lightning-
resulting from a good use of
gasm
lightning techniques in a film.
“On the next row over was the exclusive Mustang Club.
A feeling of enthusiasm
More Mustangs than you could ever want or dream
Mustangasm produced by admiring a
about were all lined up for your personal Mustangasm”
Mustang car.
(www.barry-stein.net). Taken from GloWbE.
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 40
A feeling of excitement or
“If your so happy paying subsidies, then your gonna
enthusiasm related to ex-
Obamagasm, have an ObamaGasm when you get your bill for the
President Barack Obama or
Obamaorgasm Socialist Medical Program (National Health Care)”
any policies issued by his
(www.fullertonsfuture.org). Taken from EnTenTen15.
government.
A feeling of excitement
experienced when looking at “Ultimate want. I just had a papergasm here”
Papergasm
stationary material or items (Pinterest).
made of paper.
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 41
“if Michael Bay put out a movie called “Sh*t Blows Up”
and made two hours of a seat-shaking, AC/DC blaring,
A feeling of enthusiasm or
mushroom-clouded pyrogasm of splodey bits, in super-
Pyrogasm excitement experienced when
mega 4D (enveloping you in a smog smelling of burnt
admiring pyrotechnics.
rubber and man sweat) it would be the biggest selling
movie of all time” (www.tor.com). Taken from GloWbE.
A feeling of enthusiasm “Have you seen the new episode of Doctor Who? man
Showgasm produced by attending or that show gives me the best showgasm”
watching a wonderful show. (UrbanDictionary).
A feeling of excitement
“Elly had a soundgasm every time she heard a cat
Soundgasm experienced when hearing
meow” (UrbanDictionary)
something.
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 42
A feeling of enthusiasm
Tabloidgasm produced by reading an article
in a tabloid.
A feeling of excitement of a
musician when going on tour
Tourgasm
or a fan when going to
concerts.
A feeling of enthusiasm
produced when dealing with
something related to
Vampiregasm
vampires, such as
documentaries or films where
they appear.
Presumably a feeling of
excitement or enthusiasm
“Upon Jeans reading those words, she may experience a
Wordgasm when using or reading a word
wordgasm” (UrbanDictionary).
or when reading a text that
somebody has written.
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 43
Appendix 5
A feeling of enthusiasm
“Choirgasm : An Evening of Coral Pleasure”
Choirgasm produced by listening to
(www.oica.upd.edu.ph). Taken from EnTenTen15.
the music of a choir.
A feeling of excitement
“2008 with Gaga in Miss Universe was your gagasm”
Gagasm when listening to music by
(www.gagadaily.com).
American singer Lady Gaga.
A feeling of excitement
when listening to the sound
“Dude i just bought jackson kelly and i think i also need a
of a guitar. Occasionally, it
Guitargasm change of pants because i just had a guitargasm”
can be used to refer to the
(UrbanDictionry).
feeling of pleasure obtained
while playing the guitar.
A feeling of enthusiasm
Popgasm when listening to pop
music.
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 44
A feeling of excitement “We are grateful that there is now a Soulgasm Music
Soulgasm when listening to soul Label” (www.girlpr.motionforum.net). Taken from
music. EnTenTen15.
Appendix 6
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 45
A feeling of pleasure
Lesbigasm
experienced by a lesbian.
A feeling of excitement or “As a HUGE Star Trek fan I am having a huge nerdgasm
enthusiasm experienced by over today’s announcement Star Trek is coming back
Nerdgasm
a nerd, a huge fan of to TV!” (www.statestimes.net). Taken from
something or someone. EnTenTen15.
A feeling of pleasure
experienced by a person
Queergasm who identifies himself or
herself sexually as being
queer.
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 46
A feeling of pleasure
“Dude ,I just had sex with a Latino prostitute and she
experienced by a woman
Whoregasm totally had a Whoregasm all on my lap”
who works in the
(UrbanDictionary)
prostitution business.
Appendix 7
A feeling of physical “This was very pleasurable, and triggered a series of deep
pleasure occurring clitoral orgasms, accompanied by a burst of emotion, which I
Crygasm
simultaneously with call a crygasm” (www.sexecology.org). Taken from
the activity of crying. EnTenTen15.
A feeling of rage
experienced by a
“Rick was just having a little ragegasm at being caught lying.
person, occurring
Ragegasm There’s the shame of lying, coupled with the shame of
together with a feeling
dutifully doing so on behalf of the Party” (GloWbE).
of pleasure or
excitement.
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 47
“when these people who take this drug yawn, they have an
orgasm. They -- it’s called -- you know, I’m doing this as a
A yawn which co- public service. I am -- I’m a highly trained broadcast
Yawgasm,
occurs with a feeling of specialist, ladies and gentlemen. This -- do not -- many of
Yawngasm
physical pleasure. you are thinking that I am advocating this kind of thing. I’m
simply warning you. They’re calling this effect the yawgasm”
(COCA).
Appendix 8
ABSTRACTS
The aim of this work is to study the nature of blends’ splinters, elements that have been often
referred to as ‘final combining forms’, whose status remains unclear. Our specific objective is to
analyze blends containing the element ‘-gasm’ to check tendencies in their formation. We intend
to prove that the sequence ‘-gasm’ possesses a high degree of productivity and is used
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 48
recurrently in the formation of new words. Through the analysis of the bases to which the
splinter is attached and the study of the relationship existing between the component parts of
the blends, we aim at discovering which mechanism is at work, while attempting to
accommodate the operation within the theoretical framework of Construction Morphology, an
approach to morphology within the overarching theory of Construction Grammar. This
approach, proposed by Geert Booij, acknowledges the existence of constructions as pairings of
form and meaning at word level, and thus it considers that abstractions allowing speakers to coin
new complex words are based on actual instances of words that are memorized. We have
compiled our own 200-sample corpus of novel English blends coined by native speakers of
English and taken from a variety of sources (online corpora, websites listing neologisms, social
networks, including Twitter, and even online discussion threads). For the data analysis, we
proceed as follows: (i) identify the cases of hapax legomena in the corpus in order to account for
the productivity of the process; (ii) recover the source words of all the blends subject to study
and contextualize the items in our corpus, by providing an instance of each word in a wider
context; (iii) analyze the relationships existing between the first and the second component of
the novel coinages, according to different factors, such as the notion of causality and the
cognitive and experiential relationship of cause and effect, the syntactic behaviour of the source
words and the semantic roles fulfilled by these units; (iv) identify blends exhibiting a similar
behaviour and propose constructional schemas to account for their creation. The results of our
analysis show that the splinter analyzed appears to be highly productive, and that blends ending
in ‘-gasm’ can belong to different groups, the most significant of which are the following:
(a) cause and effect blends, in which the relationship between the source words is based on the
notion of causality. Two different subsets can be identified in this group, depending on the
meaning that ‘-gasm’ acquires in the resulting blend: that of physical pleasure, as in toygasm or
that of a feeling of excitement or enthusiasm, as in neologasm; (b) experiencer blends, such as
clowngasm, where the first participant fulfils the semantic role of an experiencer, that is, the first
participant experiences the feeling of pleasure; (c) coordination blends, that is, blended words
whose source words stand in a relationship of coordination, such as crygasm; (d) adjectival
blends, in which the first element premodifies the feeling denoted by the second element, as in
fakegasm. Based on our results, constructional morphology, and especially constructional
schemas, seem to be a very appropriate tool for explaining the formation of these lexemes.
Le but de cet article est d’étudier la nature des fracto-morphèmes contenus dans les amalgames,
ces éléments généralement connus sous le nom de ‘final combining forms’ en anglais, et dont le
statut demeure encore flou. Notre objectif principal est d’analyser les amalgames contenant
l’élément ‘-gasm’ afin de mettre au jour des tendances quant à leur formation. Nous souhaitons
montrer que la séquence ‘-gasm’ exhibe un haut degré de productivité et est fréquemment
convoquée lors de la formation de nouveaux lexèmes. C’est à travers l’analyse des bases
auxquelles est attaché le fracto-morphème et l’étude des relations existantes entre les parties
constitutives des amalgames que nous souhaitons dégager le procédé à l’oeuvre, dans une
optique théorique de morphologie constructionnelle, sous-branche de la grammaire de
construction. Selon Geert Booij, cette approche postule l’existence de constructions en tant que
couplage forme-sens au niveau du lexème ; par conséquent, cette approche part du principe
selon lequel ce sont les abstractions qui permettent aux locuteurs de créer de nouveaux lexèmes
complexes basés sur des exemples attestés de lexèmes qui ont été mémorisés. Pour construire
notre corpus, nous avons ainsi recueilli un échantillon de 200 nouveaux amalgames inventés par
des locuteurs natifs anglophones dans des contextes variés (corpus en ligne, sites internet
répertoriant des néologismes, réseaux sociaux, dont Twitter, et également fils de discussion en
ligne). Pour l’analyse des données, nous avons procédé de la manière suivante : (i) identification
des cas d’hapax dans le corpus afin de verifier la productivité du procédé d’amalgamation ;
Lexis, 14 | 2019
A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters 49
(ii) mise au jour des termes sources de tous les amalgames étudiés et contextualisation de chaque
amalgame dans le corpus en fournissant un contexte large pour chacun ; (iii) analyse des
relations existantes entre le premier élément et le second élément des amalgames, selon divers
critères tels que la notion de causalité et les relations cognitives et expérientielles de cause à
effet, le comportement syntaxique des termes sources et les rôles sémantiques joués par ces
unités ; (iv) identification des amalgames ayant des propriétés semblables et proposition d’un
modèle constructionnel afin de rendre compte de leur création. Les résultats de notre étude
indiquent que le fracto-morphème ‘-gasm’ exhibe une forte productivité et que les amalgames se
terminant par ce même fracto-morphème appartiennent à divers groupes, dont les plus
représentés sont les suivants : (a) les amalgames de type cause à effet pour lesquels la relation
entre les termes sources est fondée sur la notion de causalité. Deux sous-groupes différents
peuvent être identifiés, selon le sens que ‘-gasm’ revêt dans les amalgames : plaisir physique
(toygasm) ou sentiment d’enthousiasme (neologasm) ; (b) les amalgames expérientiels (clowngasm)
dans lesquels le premier actant joue un rôle sémantique expérientiel, c’est-à-dire qu’il éprouve
un sentiment de plaisir ; (c) les amalgames coordinatifs, c’est-à-dire ceux dans lesquels les termes
sources sont dans une relation de coordination (crygasm) ; (d) les amalgames adjectivaux dans
lesquels le premier élément prémodifie le sentiment évoqué par le second élément (fakegasm).
D’après nos résultats, la morphologie constructionnelle et, plus particulièrement, les modèles
constructionnels se révèlent être très pertinents pour mettre au jour la formation de ces
lexèmes.
INDEX
Keywords: lexical blending, blend splinters, constructional morphology, constructional schemas,
semantics
Mots-clés: amalgamation lexicale, fracto-morphèmes, morphologie constructionelle, modèles
constructionnels, sémantique
AUTHOR
ALEJANDRO BARRENA JURADO
Independent researcher
l32bajua@uco.es
Lexis, 14 | 2019