Audit Notes
Audit Notes
(b) Those between elements of financial information that are expected to conform to a
predicted pattern based on the entity's experience, such as the relationship of gross profit to
sales.
(c) Those between financial information and relevant non-financial information, such as the
relationship of payroll costs to number of employees.
These estimates are often made in conditions of uncertainty regarding the outcome of
events and involve the use of judgement.
3.1 Review and testing the process/ substantive procedures performed by auditors
CHAPTER 2: INVENTORIES
If, closing inventory – overstated COS – decrease; Profit - increase
(b) Physical inventory counts before or after the end of the financial year
i. the greater the time period, the less the value of audit evidence (相差的时间太长,
越不准确)
4.0 Cut-Off (make sure sales/purchases record in the correct accounting period)
Before… talk to the management
During…. Observe
After…. Match GRN & GDN
Objectives of particular significance for tangible non-current assets are rights and obligations
(i.e., ownership), existence and valuation. It is generally necessary to carry out different tests
on ownership and existence.
• Obtain or prepare a summary of tangible non-current assets showing how (NCA Register):
• Compare non-current assets in the general ledger with the non-current assets register
• Match a sample of assets which physically exist to the non-current asset register and
general ledger.
• If a non-current asset register is not kept, obtain schedule showing the original costs and
Additions/Purchases of new assets (to confirm rights and obligations, valuation, and
completeness)
• Verify additions by inspection of architect’s certificates, lawyers’ completion statements,
vendors' invoices etc.
• Check capitalisation of expenditure is correct by considering for non-current assets
additions and items in relevant expense categories (repairs, motor expenses, sundry
expenses) whether:
- Capital/revenue distinction (asset/expenses) correctly drawn
- Capitalisation in line with consistently applied company policy
• Check purchases have been properly allocated to correct non-current asset accounts by
inspecting a sample.
• Check purchases have been authorised by directors/senior management by inspecting
Board minutes
• Check additions have been recorded in non-current asset register and general ledger for a
sample additions the year.
• Match the total of the list to the receivable ledger control account. 2
• Cast the list of balances and the receivable ledger control account. 3
EXAMPLE:
Request for confirmation
Vinnion
Sunway
- Agree that RM50000
Owe ...RM50000
C R E exist but V not
- Do not agree (further
work done)
- Do not reply (other work
done)
• Under the negative method the customer is requested to reply only if the amount stated is
disputed. The negative method may be used if the client has good internal control, with a large
number of small accounts. In some circumstances, say where there is a small number of large
and a large number of small accounts, a combination of both methods, as noted above, may be
appropriate. (Reply only if they do not agree the amount)
Auditor will have to carry out further work in relation to those accounts receivable who:
• Respond and agree with the balance. File in the reply in current audit file.
• Respond and disagree with the balance stated (positive and negative confirmation)
In the case of disagreements, the confirmation response should have identified specific
amounts which are disputed
(b) Cut off problems exist - company records the following year’s sales in the current period
or because goods returned by the customer in the current period are not recorded in current
period. Cut-off testing may have to be extended.
(c) Cut off problems exist - customer may have sent the monies before the period end, but the
monies were not recorded by the client as receipts until after the period end. Detailed cut-off
work may be required on receipts.
(d) Monies received may have been posted to the wrong account.
(e) Customers who are also suppliers may net-off balances owed and owing. Auditors should
check that this is allowed.
(f) Teeming and lading, stealing monies and incorrectly posting other receipts so that no
particular customer is seriously in debt is a fraud that can arise in this area. If auditors suspect
teeming and lading have occurred, detailed testing will be required on cash receipts, particular
on prompt posting of cash receipts.
DO NOT RESPONSE
….
• Examine the account to see if the balance outstanding represents specific invoices and confirm
their validity.
• Obtain explanations for invoices remaining unpaid after subsequent ones have been paid
• Test company’s control over the issue of credit notes and the write-off of bad debts
The following substantive procedures* will be important to check for bad and doubtful debt
thus confirm valuation.
• Review the after-date cash receipts and follow through to pre-year-end receivable balances.
• Calculate average receivable days and compare this to prior year, investigate any significant
differences.
- How well previous year's allowance has predicted actual receivables which have
• Examine credit notes issued after the year-end for allowances that should be made against
current period balances
• Check accuracy of aged receivable analysis by comparing analysis with date on invoices
• Review board minutes to assess whether there is any material disputed receivables
• Select a sample of goods despatched notes (GDN) before and just after the year end and
follow through to the sales invoice to ensure they are recorded in the correct accounting
period
• Select a sample of year-end receivable balances and agree back to valid supporting
documentation of GDN and sales order to ensure existence