Section-1 5

Section 1.
5
Section Summary
 Nested Quantifiers
 Order of Quantifiers
 Translating from Nested Quantifiers into English
 Translating Mathematical Statements into Statements
involving Nested Quantifiers.
 Translated English Sentences into Logical Expressions.
 Negating Nested Quantifiers.
Nested Quantifiers
 Nested quantifiers are often necessary to express the
meaning of sentences in English as well as important
concepts in computer science and mathematics.
 Example: “Every real number has an inverse” is
x y(x + y = 0)
where the domains of x and y are the real numbers.
 We can also think of nested propositional functions:
x y(x + y = 0) can be viewed as x Q(x) where Q(x) is
y P(x, y) where P(x, y) is (x + y = 0)
Thinking of Nested Quantification
 Nested Loops
 To see if xyP (x,y) is true, loop through the values of x :
 At each step, loop through the values for y.
 If for some pair of x andy, P(x,y) is false, then x yP(x,y) is false and both
the outer and inner loop terminate.
x y P(x,y) is true if the outer loop ends after stepping through each x.
 To see if x yP(x,y) is true, loop through the values of x:
 At each step, loop through the values for y.
 The inner loop ends when a pair x and y is found such that P(x, y) is true.
 If no y is found such that P(x, y) is true the outer loop terminates as x
yP(x,y) has been shown to be false.
x y P(x,y) is true if the outer loop ends after stepping through each x.
 If the domains of the variables are infinite, then this process can not actually be
carried out.
Order of Quantifiers
Example: Let P(x, y) be the statement “x + y = y + x.” What
are the truth values of the quantifications ∀x∀yP(x, y) and
∀y∀xP(x, y), where the domain for all variables consists of
all real numbers?
 Solution: The quantification ∀x∀yP(x, y) denotes the
proposition
“For all real numbers x, for all real numbers y, x + y = y + x.”
∀x∀yP(x, y) and ∀y∀xP(x, y) have the same meaning, and
both are true.
 EXAMPLE: Let Q(x, y) denote “x + y = 0.” What are the truth
values of the quantifications ∃y∀xQ(x, y) and ∀x∃yQ(x, y),
where the domain for all variables consists of all real
numbers?
 Solution: The quantification ∃y∀xQ(x, y) denotes the
proposition
“There is a real number y such that for every real number x, Q(x,
y).”
 No matter what value of y is chosen, there is only one value of
x for which x + y = 0. Because there is no real number y such
that x + y = 0 for all real numbers x, the statement ∃y∀xQ(x, y)
is false.
 The quantification ∀x∃yQ(x, y) denotes the proposition
“For every real number x there is a real number y such
that Q(x, y).”
Given a real number x, there is a real number y such that
x + y = 0; namely, y = −x. Hence, the statement ∀x∃yQ(x,
y) is true.
 This example illustrates that the order in which
quantifiers appear makes a difference. The statements
∃y∀xP(x, y) and ∀x∃yP(x, y) are not logically equivalent.
 EXAMPLE: Let Q(x, y, z) be the statement “x + y = z.” What
are the truth values of the statements ∀x∀y∃zQ(x, y, z)
and ∃z∀x∀yQ(x, y, z), where the domain of all variables
consists of all real numbers?
 Solution: Suppose that x and y are assigned values. Then,
there exists a real number z such that x + y = z.
Consequently, the quantification ∀x∀y∃zQ(x, y, z), which
is the statement
“For all real numbers x and for all real numbers y there is a
real number z such that x + y = z,” is true.
 The order of the quantification here is important, because
the quantification ∃z∀x∀yQ(x, y, z), which is the
statement
“There is a real number z such that for all real numbers x and
for all real numbers y it is true that x + y = z,”
is false, because there is no value of z that satisfies the
equation x + y = z for all values of x and y.
Questions on Order of Quantifiers
Example 1: Let U be the real numbers,
Define P(x,y) : x ∙ y = 0
What is the truth value of the following:
1. xyP(x,y)
Answer: False
2. xyP(x,y)
Answer: True
3. xy P(x,y)
Answer: True
4. x  y P(x,y)
Answer: True
Questions on Order of Quantifiers
Example 2: Let U be the real numbers,
Define P(x,y) : x / y = 1
What is the truth value of the following:
1. xyP(x,y)
Answer: False
2. xyP(x,y)
Answer: False
3. xy P(x,y)
Answer: False
4. x  y P(x,y)
Answer: True
Quantifications of Two Variables
Statement When True? When False
P(x,y) is true for every There is a pair x, y for
pair x,y. which P(x,y) is false.
For every x there is a y for There is an x such that

which P(x,y) is true. P(x,y) is false for every y.
There is an x for which For every x there is a y for
P(x,y) is true for every y. which P(x,y) is false.
There is a pair x, y for P(x,y) is false for every
which P(x,y) is true. pair x,y
Translating from Nested Quantifiers into English
 EXAMPLE: Translate the statement

∀x(C(x) ∨ ∃y(C(y) ∧ F(x, y)))
into English, where C(x) is “x has a computer,” F(x, y) is “x and
y are friends,” and the domain for both x and y consists of all
students in your school.
 Solution: The statement says that for every student x in your
school, x has a computer or there is a student y such that y has
a computer and x and y are friends. In other words, every
student in your school has a computer or has a friend who
has a computer.
Translating from Nested Quantifiers into English
 EXAMPLE : Translate the statement

∃x∀y∀z((F(x, y) ∧ F(x, z) ∧ (y ≠ z)) → ¬F(y, z))
into English, where F(a, b) means a and b are friends and the domain
for x, y, and z consists of all students in your school.
 Solution: We first examine the expression (F(x, y) ∧ F(x, z) ∧ (y ≠ z))
→ ¬F(y, z). This expression says that if students x and y are friends,
and students x and z are friends, and furthermore, if y and z are not
the same student, then y and z are not friends. It follows that the
original statement, which is triply quantified, says that there is a
student x such that for all students y and all students z other than y,
if x and y are friends and x and z are friends, then y and z are not
friends. In other words, there is a student none of whose friends
are also friends with each other.
Translating Mathematical Statements into
Predicate Logic
Example : Translate “The sum of two positive integers is always
positive” into a logical expression.
Solution:
1. Rewrite the statement to make the implied quantifiers and
domains explicit:
“For every two integers, if these integers are both positive, then the sum of
these integers is positive.”
2. Introduce the variables x and y, and specify the domain, to
obtain:
“For all positive integers x and y, x + y is positive.”
3. The result is:
x  y ((x > 0)∧ (y > 0)→ (x + y > 0))
where the domain of both variables consists of all integers
Translating English Sentences into Logical Expressions
Example: Use quantifiers to express the statement “There is

a woman who has taken a flight on every airline in the
world.”
Solution:
1. Let P(w,f) be “w has taken f ” and Q(f,a) be “f is a flight
on a .”
2. The domain of w is all women, the domain of f is all
flights, and the domain of a is all airlines.
3. Then the statement can be expressed as:
w a f (P(w,f ) ∧ Q(f,a))
 EXAMPLE: Express the statement “Everyone has exactly one

best friend” as a logical expression involving predicates,
quantifiers with a domain consisting of all people, and logical
connectives.
 Solution: When we introduce the predicate B(x, y) to be the
statement “y is the best friend of x,” the statement that x has
exactly one best friend can be represented as
∃y(B(x, y) ∧ ∀z((z ≠ y) → ¬B(x, z))).
Consequently, our original statement can be expressed as
∀x∃y(B(x, y) ∧ ∀z((z ≠ y) → ¬B(x, z))).
[Note that we can write this statement as ∀x∃!yB(x, y), where ∃! is
the “uniqueness quantifier”
EXAMPLE: Express each of these mathematical statements

using predicates, quantifiers, logical connectives, and
mathematical operators.
 a) The product of two negative real numbers is positive.
 b) The difference of a real number and itself is zero.
 c) Every positive real number has exactly two square
roots.
 d) A negative real number does not have a square root
that is a real number.
 a) ∀x ∀y ((x < 0) ∧ (y < 0) → (xy > 0))

 b) ∀x(x − x = 0)
 c) ∀x∃a∃b(a ≠ b ∧ ∀c(𝑐 2 = x ↔ (c = a ∨c = b)))
 d) ∀x((x < 0) → ￢∃y(x = 𝑦 2 ))
Questions on Translation from
English
Choose the obvious predicates and express in predicate logic.
Example 1: “Brothers are siblings.”
Solution: x y (B(x,y) → S(x,y))
Example 2: “Siblinghood is symmetric.”
Solution: x y (S(x,y) → S(y,x))
Example 3: “Everybody loves somebody.”
Solution: x y L(x,y)
Example 4: “There is someone who is loved by everyone.”
Solution: y x L(x,y)
Example 5: “There is someone who loves someone.”
Solution: x y L(x,y)
Example 6: “Everyone loves himself”
Solution: x L(x,x)
Negating Nested Quantifiers
Example 1: Recall the logical expression developed three slides back:
w a f (P(w,f ) ∧ Q(f,a))
Part 1: Use quantifiers to express the statement that “There does not exist a woman
who has taken a flight on every airline in the world.”
Solution: ¬w a f (P(w,f ) ∧ Q(f,a))
Part 2: Now use De Morgan’s Laws to move the negation as far inwards as possible.
Solution:
1. ¬w a f (P(w,f ) ∧ Q(f,a))
2. w ¬ a f (P(w,f ) ∧ Q(f,a)) by De Morgan’s for 
3. w  a ¬ f (P(w,f ) ∧ Q(f,a)) by De Morgan’s for 
4. w  a f ¬ (P(w,f ) ∧ Q(f,a)) by De Morgan’s for 
5. w  a f (¬ P(w,f ) ∨ ¬ Q(f,a)) by De Morgan’s for ∧.
Part 3: Can you translate the result back into English?
Solution:
“For every woman there is an airline such that for all flights, this woman has not
taken that flight or that flight is not on this airline”
Some Questions about Quantifiers
(optional)
 Can you switch the order of quantifiers?
 Is this a valid equivalence?
Solution: Yes! The left and the right side will always have the same truth value.
The order in which x and y are picked does not matter.
Solution: No! The left and the right side may have different truth values for some
propositional functions for P. Try “x + y = 0” for P(x,y) with U being the integers. The
order in which the values of x and y are picked does matter.
 Can you distribute quantifiers over logical connectives?
Solution: Yes! The left and the right side will always have the same truth value no
matter what propositional functions are denoted by P(x) and Q(x).
Solution: No! The left and the right side may have different truth values. Pick “x is
a fish” for P(x) and “x has scales” for Q(x) with the domain of discourse being all
animals. Then the left side is false, because there are some fish that do not have
scales. But the right side is true since not all animals are fish.

Section-1 5

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Section-1 5

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Section-1 5

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Section 1.

For every x there is a y for There is an x such that

 EXAMPLE: Translate the statement

 EXAMPLE : Translate the statement

Example: Use quantifiers to express the statement “There is

 EXAMPLE: Express the statement “Everyone has exactly one

EXAMPLE: Express each of these mathematical statements

 a) ∀x ∀y ((x < 0) ∧ (y < 0) → (xy > 0))

You might also like