Iso TS 10020 2022
Iso TS 10020 2022
Iso TS 10020 2022
SPECIFICATION 10020
First e d i t io n
2022-08
Reference nu mber
ISO/TS 10020:2022(E}
©!SO 2022
ISO/TS 10020:2022(£)
Contents Page
Foreword . .. . .. . ... .. .. ..
. . .. """"'"""' -·-· . . -....... . ................. ...-....- ...... __,. .. . ... .. ..
.. .. .. . . . .. . . ... ".v
1 Scope . .
... ..... ....... .... .
..... . ..... .. ....... ... .. .. . ..... .... .. . .. .. .. . ..... ......... . . .. . .
.... ... .. . ........ . . .... .. ..... _ . .. . .. . .. .
.. ... _ . .... ........ ... . .... ............. . . ............ ... . ... . . .. ........ .. . 1
...
4 Orga n iza tional change ma nagement concepts.. . .. .. .. . .... ... ... . .... .. ... .. ..... .. . . .. . ... . . . . . . .. . ... . .. ... .. 2 ...... . ... . .. . . .. . ...... . . . . ... .. . ... .. .. ... .
4.1 General . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
... .. .... . . . . . .. . . .
.... . . . . . .. . . . . . .
.. .. ... ... . . .. . . 2
.. ... .. . .... ... . . . . .......... ... ... ... ._ . ... ...... .. ........ ... .... ... ..... . .. .......... . . . ........ .. . . ....
4.2 Orga n i zations and interested parties . .... .. . ... . ... . .. . . . . . . . ... . ... .. ... .... .. . . . . .. .... . . . ... . .. .. .. . . . . .. .. 2 ... .. . .. .. . .. . . .. . . .... ... . .... . . .. .. . .... .. . ..
4.5 Process model. .... .... . .. .. . . .. . .... .. . ... . .... . ... . . . ... . . . . ... . . . . .. .. .. .. .. ... . ... . . . ... . . . .. . . .. . .. .. . .... .. . ... . .3
. . .... . rn . ... . . . . . . . .. . .. .. . ... ... .. . . .. . ... . . ... . . ..... ... . . .. . . . . .. .
5.2 Process . .. . . .. .. .. .
...... ... ........ .. . ... . .... . . . .. .
. ... .. . . .
..... ................... .. . -............................................. ... 6
... .. .. . .... .................... . .... ....... ....... ......... ...
6.2 C ha nge scenario process . . ..... ................... ................................................ ... ...... .................. .... .... 7
........................... ...... ..
6.2 .4 Activ ities a n d tasks .. .. ... .. .. . ..... .. ... ... . ... ... . ... . .... .. .. ... .. . ... ... . . .. .. .. .. ..... . ..... . ...... . . . . .. . . . . . ... . . .... .... . 8
.. . . . . . ........ . . . . . .. .. .... . . . . . . . .
6.2.5 Docu mented i n formation ... . .. .. .. . . .. . .. . .. . . . ... .. .. .. .. . . ..... ... . ... . . ... .... ... .. ..... ... ...... . ... . . . ..... ... . . . .. . 8 .. . . . . ... . . . . .. . . ..
6.3 I nterested party identification process ... . -.......................... ..........................,.......... ................. ... 9
. . . . . .... ........
6.3.1 General . . . . . .. ... . .. . . ... .. . ... .. . . .. .... . ... . ... . ... . . .... . . .. ... . .. . . . .. . .. .. ... . . . . . 9
. ... .. . ..... .... . .... ..... . .. .. . .. . ...... . ... .... . .. .. .... .. ... ...... . . . . .. . .. .. .... . .... . . .. .
6. 3. 2 Purpose . .. .... . ................... .............. .... ............. ..... ........... ............. . ............ .............. .... .............. . . .. ................ ...... .... 9
.
6.3.4 Activities a nd tasks .. .. ... . . .. ... .. .. . . .. . . .. . .. ... . . ..... . . . . . . .. . .. .... ... . ... ..... . . .. . . .. . .. .. 9
. ... .. .. . .. . .. .. . . . .. . . .. . ........ . ... .... .... .. .. ..... ....... . .. . . .. . . ..
6.3.S Documen ted i n formation .. .. . ... . ... ...... .. .. ..... ....... ... .... .. ..... . .. . ... . . . .. . . . ... ..... .. ... .. ..... . . ..".................. ................ 9
. . . . . .
6.4.1 Genera l ... .... ... .... . .. .. . ... ... . ... .. ........ .... ... . ... . . . ... ... .. . . ... .... .. . ... . ... . .... . . .. ... .... .... . . .. . .. ... . . . .. . ... . .. . . . . .. .... 9
. . .. . . . . . .. . . .... .. . ... . .. . . . ... .. . .. .. . . . . .
6.4.2 Purpose .. ... . ...... ... . . ..... .. . . ... ... .. ... .. . .. . .... . .. .. ... .. . -.......................................-...................................... ... . 1 0
.. . . . .. .. ... . . . .... . .. . .. ..
6.4.4 Activities a nd tasks .. . . ... .. ... .. .. . ... ... . . . . . . . . ... .. . . . . . . .. .. . . .. .. . . . . .. ... ... . . ... .. .. . . .. ... .. 1 0
. . .. .... .. ... .. . . .. . . . . . . . ... . .. . ... . .. . . . ... . ... . . . ... . ... . ... . .. . .
6.4.S Docu mented i n formation ... ...... . ... .... . ... . ..... ... ... ... ..... . . . .... ...... ..... ... ....... .... .... .. . ..... ...... ... .. ... ... .... .. . .. . . .. 1 0 . . . . . . . . ....
7 Implementation processes ... .... ... . . . . . .... .. .. .. .. .. ....... .... ...... .. .. .. ..... . . .. .. ... .. .. . .. .. . .... . .... ... . .. . ... . . . .... . .. . . .. ... ... .. . 1 1
.. . . . . . . .. . . .. .
7.2.1 Genera 1...... ... . . . .. .... .. .. . . . ..... ... .... ... .. ..... .. .. .. .. .. .... .. . ... . . ...... . . ... .. ... . .. ... . .. .... . . .. ... .. ... .... . .. . .. .. .. . .. .. ...... ... 11
.. . . . ... .. . . . . . .. . ... .. . . . ..
7. 2.4 Activ ities and tasks .. . .. .. ........ .. ... .. .. .. ... . ... . .. . ... ... . . . ...... . .. . ... ..... . .. . . .. .. . .... .. . .. .. . . . . . ...... ..... ... ... .. . 1 1
. . . . . .. . . . ... .
7. 2.S Docu mented informa i o n ............... .... ........... ........ .................. ........................................................................... 1 2
7.3 A ffected interested party identification process ................................................................. .................. . 1 2 ..
7.3.1 General . .... ..... . ....... ...... .. . .. ..... . ... . .... . .. . .. . .. ... ... . ...... .. .. ........... . . . . ... ... ... . .. . ..... ... . . ... ..... . ... . ... . .... .... . .. . .. ...... .-... ........ 12
. .. . . . . . . .
7.3.4 Act iv itie.s and tasks . . ..... .......... . .. ... .. . ..... ... .. ..... . ... ..... ... .... ..... .. .. ....... . . ... .... .. .. . . ... .. . . .. .... .... ...... ..... ..... .... ... . 13
. .. . .... . .. ..
7.3.5 Docu mented i n formation ... . .. . . .. .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . ... ... .. . ... .. ..... .. .. . . . . .. . . ..... . . . . ... . . . .. 13 . . .. . . .. .. ... . . . . . .. ... .... . .. . . .. ... . . .. ... . .. ... .. . . . .
7.4 A ffected i nterested party intervention process . . . . . .. .. . . . ... . . .. .. ..... . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . 13 ..... . . ... . ... . . . .. .... . .. . ... . .. . . . ... ..... .. .. . ... . .
7.4.5 Docu mented i n formation . . . . . . .. . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .... . 14 .. ..... .. ... .. . .... . .... . ... . ... .... .... . . ....... ...... ...... ... . .... ... ... ..... ... .. ... . .. . .. . ..
7.5 Cha nge 1nan agement reporting process . .............. ... ... ... .......... ..... .. .......... .... ... ...... .... ......... .. ... ....... .. 14
. . . .. . . . ... .. . . ..
7.5. 1 General .... . . . . .... .. . . .. .... ... . . . . .... . . ... ... . . .... .. ... .. .. . .. ... .. . . . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. ... .. . 14
. .. . . ..... .. . .... ..... . . .. . ... . . . . . .. .... . .. . . . . .. .. .... . .. .. . . ... . . .. .. . . .. . ...... . . . .....
7.5.S Documented informa ion . .... .. . . . ... .. .. . . . . ... .... ..... . . .. .. . ...... ... ... .. .... . ..... . .. 1 5
.. . .... . . . . .. ....... . . . ..... .. .. ... ............. ... . .....
8 Measu ring a ffected i n terested pa rty i n tervention progress on the cha nge matrix . .. .. 1 6 . . ... ... . .
8.1 The cha nge matrix........... .. .. .. . . .................. ............ .. ...... ....... .... .. ....... ..... ..... ....... ................. ................... 16
. . ..
8.3 Aggregation of a ffected i nterested parties change matrix positions to h igher levels ........ 18
8.3.1 General ... ...... ... . . ........... . .... ...... ... .., ........ . ............. ...... ....... .. . . , .. ..... ........ ....... .. ... ..... ............ 18
.
8.3.2 C ha nge matrix cel l aggregation problem ... . . .. . . . . . .. . 18 ...._... . ... . .................. ..... ..... .... ....... ....... .. . . ......... .. ....
8.3.3 Change matrix cel l aggregat ion models .. ... . . . . . . . ... .. ... . . . . .... ... . .. . 19 . ... . . ... . . .. . ... .. .. ... . ... ....... . . . . .. . ... .. . .. . .. .. . . . ..
Bibliography .
......... .........� ........ ......... ........ ............................................... .............. ....................................... ............................ ........................................ 41
Foreword
ISO (the I nternational Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies ( ISO member bodies). The work of preparing I nternational Standards is normally carried out
throu g h ISO tech n ica l committees. Each member body i n terested in a subject for wh ich a tec h n ical
comm ittee has been establ ished has the right to be represented on that com m ittee. I nternational
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in lia ison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the l nterna ional Electrotechnical Comm ission (!EC) on a l l matters of
electrotech n ical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document a nd t hose intended for its further maintenance are
d scribed in the ISO/ IE C D i rectives, Part . In particular the d i fferent approval criteria needed for the
,
di fferent types of !SO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance w ith the
editorial rules of the ISO/!EC Directives, Part 2 (see I . r r tlv ).
Attention is drawn to the possibil ity that some of the elements of this docu ment may be the subject of
patent rights. !SO shall not be held responsible for identifying a ny or all such patent rights. Details of
a ny patent rights identified dur ing the development of the document wilt be in the I ntroduction and/or
on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www.iso.org/patcnts) .
Any trade name used i n this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an expla nation of the vol untary nature of sta ndards, the mea n i ng of rso specific terms and
expression s related to conform ity assessment, as well as i n formation about lSO's ad herence to
the World Trade Organization (WTO) principles i n the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), see
www.iso.org/jso/fore word.htmI.
This document was prepared by Technical Com m ittee ISO/TC 17 6, Quality mana9ement and quality
Subcommittee SC 3, Supporting technologies.
assurance,
A ny feedback or questions on this document should be d irected to the user's national standards body. A
complete listin g of t hese bod ies can be fou nd atwww.i.so.org/members.html.
Introduction
The purpose of this document is to describe processes for organ izational change management (OC M )
that can be used by organ izations when u nder·tak i ng a n y form o f OCM. I t comprises process descriptions
that elaborate the OCM processes.
Since O C M is a key approach to risk-m itigation in orga nizational development, this document follows
a risk-based approach. Risk-based change management is a best-practice approach to strategizing
and ma nagi ng orga n izat ional cha nge, as it al lows cha nges to be prioritized and focused on the most
i mportant needs and opportun ities.
Each process is described using the generic process template provided i n ISO/IEC/ I E E E 24774:20 2 1,
and covers the pu rpose, outcomes, activities, tasks and i n formation item s of each process.
Documentation items to be produced by the OCM processes are p rovided in Annexes A and .B..
u.u.�)._Cprovides a high-level cross-reference between the clauses of this document and the clauses of
I SO 9001 .
This docu ment aims to provide OCM practitioners with the i n formation requ ired to manage nd
perform OCM in organizations.
1 Scope
This document specifies processes that can be used to govern, manage and i mplement organizational
change management fOCM) for organizations, projects or smaller activities. I t comprises generic
process descriptions that describe the OCM processes. Supporti ng d iagra ms descri bin g the processes
are also provided.
This document is applicable, but not l i mited, to change sponsors, change agents, change team members
a nd project managers, pa rtic u larly t hose respo n s ib le for governi ng, ma naging a nd i mplementing
organ izational change.
2 Normative references
3 Terms a n d definitions
For the purposes of this docu ment, the following terms and definitions apply.
ISO and IEC mai ntai n termi nology databases for use i n standard ization at the fo l lowing addresses:
3.1
aggregati o n model
combi ned view of the current state of organ izational change
Note 1 to en ry; The combined view presents the positions of interested parties (33) on he change matrix (ll).
3.2
c h a nge matri x
t wo-d imensional array s h ow i n g the relationsh ip between product o r service rea l ization stages and
organizational change stages
Note 1 to entry: The p rod u ct or s ervice realiz< t[on s tages are presented on th e x-axis and organizational change
stages on t h e y-axis.
3.3
i nterested party
stakeholder
person or orga n izat ion that ca n affe<.:t, be affected by, or perceive itself to be affected by a decision o r
activity
EXAM PLE Customers, owners, people in a n orga nization, providers, ban kers, reg u lators, u n i o ns, pa rtners or
society t hat can i n clude competitors or oppos i n g pressure groups.
If the first three factors a re present a nd the result of multiplying these th ree factors exceeds the
resistance to change, then mea n i ngfu l organ izational change is l i kely to take place.LS.I
Because D, V and Fare multiplied, if any value is absent (zero) or low, then the product will be zero o r
low and therefore n ot capable of overcoming the resistance.
The key factors, D, 11, F and Rare evaluated for impact in the context of each identified i nterested party,
i n the first instance, a nd secon d ly i n terms of the speci fic concern ( i . e . iss ue) that is u nder consideration.
I n most situations, the relationship between i nterested parties and issues is l i kely to be complex, and
requires a detailed analysis i n order to properly identify these relationships.
I n t h is docu ment. ISO/JEC/IEEE 247 74 is used to support the description of each OCM p rocess.
Processes a re described in terms of:
process title;
process pu rpose;
process outcomes;
process activities;
process tasks;
This document groups the OCM activities i nto three process groups, as shown in Figure 1. Each of the
processes with i n those g roups is descrihed in terms of its pu rpose and desi red outcomes, and l i s ts
activit ies and tasks which need to be performed .
Governance process
Management processes
Imp1ementation processes
1) the aim of th is layer is to describe processes that cover th� ma nagement of organizational
change for an entire change scenario, or change project;
2) this layer comprises the follow i ng processes:
The layers of the OCM process model comprise varying nu mbers of OCM processes, as shown in figure 2.
Governance process
Management processes
Implementation processes
5 Governan ce p rocess
5.1 General
The governa nce process is used to develop and manage orgat1izational changes.
The governance process typically appl ies to the OCM activities across the whole orga nization (i .e. they
a re not project based).
An OCM policy and OCM strategy a re examples of documented i n fo rmation supporting t hi s process.
The governa nce process is generic and can be used to develop and manage other non-project speci fic
documents, such as a programme OCM s trategy that applies to a number of related projects.
The OCM policy can be used to describe the purpose, goals and overall scope of OCM vvithin the
o rgan ization. I t estahli shes OCM practices and provides a fra mework for esta blishing, reviewing and
continually i mprovi ng the governance process.
The OCM s trategy describes how t he change management is perf o rmed within the organ i zation. I t
i s generic documented i n formation that provides guideli nes for a number of cha nge projects in the
,
orga n ization a nd is not specific to a ny change project.
fjgur� 3 shows the governa nce process i n a typ ic al situat ion where i t has been appl ied to create
and maintain both an orga n ization's OCM policy and OCM strategy. As Figure 3 i l l u st ra tes the two
activities continually i nt ra t with each other. The OCM strategy ne�ds to align with the OCM policy.
Feedback from this activity is provided back to the OCM policy for possible i mprovement. Similarly, the
ma nagement processes being used on each of the cha nge projects with i n the o rga n ization need to align
with the OCM strategy (a n d policy), a nd fe dback from the manag ment of these change proj ct.s is
used to i m prove the OCM strategy and policy.
OCM policy
/
Policy/
strategy OCM strategy
improvements
\ )
Feedback on Apply in
policy and change
-
strategy ....
projects
5.2 P rocess
T he governa nce process comprises activities for the c reation, review a n d mai n tena nce of OCM po l i cy
a nd strategy, and related docu mentat ion items.
5.3 P u rpose
The purpose of the governa nce process is o d i rect the orga n ization in th ach ievemen of its v i sion,
m ission, strategy and goals related to OCM, t h rough assu ring the defin ition of related objectives, policy
a n d strategy.
5.4 Outcomes
As a result of the successful implementation of the governance process:
t he context of the orga n izat ion, includ i ng the expectations of it s relevant interested pa rties, with
respect to OCM are u nderstood and analysed;
t he scope of OCM system activities a re described, taking the context of the organ i zation i nto
consideration;
the OCM system pol icy and object i ves are described;
the OCM system and ope ratio n al process strategy is determined;
com m itment and leadership in regard to establish i ng, m a i n ta i n i ng and i mprovi ng t h is process is
demonstrated.
The fol low ing activit ies and tasks should be implemented in accorda nce with applicable orga n ization
polic i es and procedu res w ith respect to the governance process, as appropriate.
T he development of OCM pol icy and strategy con sists of the fol lowi ng tasks:
top ma nagement demonstrates leadersh ip and commitment by nsuring that the OCM pol icy
and objectives are established and are co m patible with the context and strategic d i rection of the
organ ization;
oblig a tions to support the object ives of the orga nizationa l cha nge pol i c y and s rategy are ident ified
within the organization and interested parties;
the OCM system and operational process strategy a re determined;
comm itm e n t and leadership in rega rd to est a bl i s hi ng, ma i n ta i n i ng and i mproving this process
strategy is de m onstrated .
As a resu lt of perfor m i ng this proc ss, the fol lowi ng documented i n formation is produced:
OCM policy (see A..2.)...2 ;
OCM strategy (see A.2...3.).
6 Management processes
6.1 General
6.2.1 Genera l
The change scenario process is used to identi fy a programme-\vide change init iative. Depending on
where in the organization this process i s implemented, this can support a programme-w ide or project
wide change plan. I f the scope of the propos d change is localized, then the change plan can be lim ited
in scope within the iss ues identification process.
6.2.2 P u rpose
The purpose of the change scenario process is to ident ify t he scope, approach, benefits, risks and
opportunities that will be taken to address an organizationa l change initiat ive.
6.2.3 Outcomes
6.2.4. 1 Gene ra l
T he change scenario process should implement t he activit ies given in 6.2.4.2 to 6.2.4.6 and tasks i n
accorda nce with appl icable pol icy a n d strategy identified in the governance process. as appropriate.
6.3.1 Genera l
The interested party identification process identifies interested parties that a re relevant to the
orga n ization, includ ing their needs and expe<.:tations.
6.3.2 Pu rpose
The purpose of the i nterested pa rty identification process is to identify i nterested parties that are
relevant to the orga n ization, i nclud i ng their needs and expectations.
6.3.3 Outcomes
6.3.4.1 General
The interested party identificat ion process shou ld i mplement the activit ies and tasks given in 6.3.4.2 in
accordance with applicable policy and strategy identified i n the governance process.
the needs a nd expectations associated with the i nterested parties are identified;
appropriate contact with identi fied interested parties is establi shed.
As a result of perform i ng this process, the fol low ing documented information is produced:
i nterested party profile (see A..3.)...3. ;
i nterested party communication record (see i\.3 .4).
6.4.1 Genera l
The i ntervention defin ition process serves to identify a portfo lio of i nterventions that will be applied
selectively wherever and whenever OCM activities are conducted.
The portfolio can contai n definitions of i nterventions that are appl ied commonly in change management
activ ities. The scope of this process also covers i ntervention types that is specific to d isti nct
orga nizational con exts.
6.4.2 P urpose
The purpose of the i ntervention defi nition process is to describe i nterventions that are applied general ly
and selectively i n resolv i ng organ izational change scenarios.
6.4.3 O utcomes
6.4.4. 1 Genera l
The intervention definition process should implement the activ ities and tasks g iven in 6.4.4. 2 to 6.4.4.4
in accorda nce with applicable pol icy and strategy identified in the governance process.
As a resu lt of perform i ng this process, the fol low i ng docu men ed i n forma ion is p roduced:
- i ntervention specification (see A..3....5_) .
7 I m p lementation p rocesses
7.1 General
The implementation processes describe how cha nge ma nagement related issues are identi fied, how
interested parties a ffected by the issue a re identified. how interv ntions are appl ied to i nterested
parties a ffected by the issue, a nd finally, how the change management reporting process provides
various reports on the status of cha nge scena rios (at the pmgra mme level) to the resol ution of issues
(at the project, or lower level).
There a re fou r processes:
i ssue identification (see 7. );
a f fected in terested pa rty identi fication lsee 73J ;
7.2.1 G e n eral
The issue identi fication process describes how issues that are i m portant and relevant to the associated
change scenario are identified.
7.2.2 P u rpose
The pu rpose of the issue identification process is to identify he scope, approach, benefits, risks and
opportu nities that will be taken to address an organizational cha nge i n itiative, within the context of a n
identified change scenario.
7.2.3 O utcomes
7.2.4.1 General
The issue identification process shou ld i mplem nt the activities and tasks given in 7.2.4.2 to Z2.4.5 in
accordance with applicable policy and strategy identified in the governance process, as appropriate.
OTE T he default agg regation model for each issue ls i n herited from the aggregation model ass ig ned i n
the cha nge scena rio process. A d i fferent value for the aggregation model can b e assigned when circ u m s t a nces
i nd icate the need for t h i s .
A a result of performing this process, h fol lowing docu mented i n format ion is produced :
- change plan (see AA.2).
7. 3 . 1 Genera l
The a ffected i nterested party identi fication process describes how int erested parties that are affected
by an issue are then identified and associated w ith the issue.
7 .3.2 Purpose
The p u rpos e of the a ffected i nterested pa rty identi fication process is to id e n t i fy i n terested pa rties that
a re a ffected by an issue.
7 .3.3 Outcomes
As a result of the successful implementation of the a ffected i nterested party identification process:
the extent to which the i nterested party is i mpacted by the issue is identified;
the read i ness for cha nge of the i n terested party is determ ined;
the weighti ng of the interested party \o\r ith respect to the cha nge scena rio is described;
- the i n itial position of the interested party on the change matrix is determ ined.
The affected i nterested party identification process should implement the activities a nd ta sks gi ve n i n
7.3.4.2 to 7.3.4.5 in accorda nce with appl icable pol icy a nd strategy identified in the governance process.
7.3.4.5 Determine a ffected interested pa rty cha nge matrix i n i tial position
As a result of performing this process, the fol lowing documented i n formation is pro duced:
- affected interested party profile (see 4:.3).
7 .4.1 General
The affected interested party i ntervention process describes how the issues that affect i nterested
parties a re l i n ked to appropriate i n terventions, with a view to progressing the i nterested pa rty further
a long the cha nge matrix.
7 .4.2 Pu rpose
The purpose of the a ffected interested party intervention process is to execute selected i nterventions
that a re l i n ked to issues with a ffected i n terested parties.
7 .4.3 Outcomes
As a result of the successfu l implementation of the affected interested pa rty in tervention process:
the baseline position of the interested party 011 t he change matrix is determined;
the des i red position on the ch a ng e matrix, following the i ntervention is identified;
the scheduled start and end dates for the execution of the intervention are determi ned;
the current status of the execution of the intervention is known;
at the conclusion of the i n tervention, the new position of the interested party on the change matrix
is assessed.
7 .4.4.1 Genera l
T he affected interested party i ntervention process shou ld implement the activities and tasks given in
7.4.4.2 to 7.4.4.5 i n accorda nce with appl icable pol icy and strategy identi fied i n the governance process.
7 .4.4.5 Dete1·mi n e affected i n terested pa rty i nterve n ti o n final change matrix position
As a result of performing this process, the fol low i ng docu mented i n format ion is produced:
7 .5.1 General
T he change management reporting process describes how the reporting of organizational changes a re
managed and progressed.
7.5.2 P u rpose
The purpose of the cha nge management reporting process is to report on the progress of identified
issues th rough to resolution.
7.5.3 Outcomes
As a result of the successfu I i mplementation of the cha nge management reporting process:
the status and progress of i ss ues towards resolution is determined.
reports are prepared that provide necessary and su ffic ient information to affected i nterested
parties on he progress of issues towards resol ution.
7S4
. . ActiVities a n d tasks
754 1
. . . Gen eral
The change management reporting p rocess should i mplement the activities and tasks given i n 7,5,4.2 to
2.5..ti
i n accorda nce with applicable pol icy and strategy identified i n the governance process.
As a result of performi ng this process, the following docu mented i n formation i s p roduced:
change scenario status report (see );
change plan s tatus report (see A.4.8);
chang ma nagement special need report (see AA.,2) .
8 M easu ring affected i n terested pa rty intervention progress o n the cha nge
matrix
The change matrix is a two-dimensional grid (see Figure 4) to i l lustrate the process of adaptation of
an a ffected interested party to the orga nizational cha nges implied by a n issue. This model is usefu l for
visual izing the theory of cha nge, a lthough intermediate steps can be orn i ted in practice.
Denial 1 5 9 13 17
Emotional 2 6 10 14 18
Acceptance
3 7 11 15 19
/rejection
Commitment
4 8 12 16 20
/opposition
The horizontal d i mension of the grid describes the change rea lization phases. The fol lowi ng phases a re
identi fied :
Why: I mplying a focus on the i ntention, or pu rpose, associated with the proposed change.
What: What has to be done to real ize the new/changed product service. Frequently this is described
as he "process" that needs to be applied.
With: This phase focuses on the nature of the resources that have to be identified and applied.
Resources can i nclude i n frastructure elements (physical and virtual), financial resources and
support from people.
Who: Although people as a resou rce was identi fied in the pr vious phase, this phas is a focus u pon
the organizational and structural relationships i nvolving people, notably the roles and capabili ties
that need to be appl ied to the proposed new/cha nged product/service.
When: The major preoccupation ·n th is phase is upon the tim ing relat i om of the deployed process.
Typical ly, this phase has major operationa l implications.
The vertical dimension of the grid describes the orga nizational change phases. The following p hases
are identified :
Deni a l: Key cha racteristic is a fea r- i nd uc in g mi n ds e . D u r i n g t h i s stage, people w i I I beg in rationa 1 izi ng
i n a way that dimin ishes or negates the need for change.
Emotional: Key characteristic is a p robl e m - ident i fy i n g m i n ds e t . M o ra le, competency and p ro d u c t i vi ty
decl ine during this stage. Emotional and defensive reactions increase.
figure 4 i m plies hat a n a ffect d interested party moves hrough the cel l s of the c h a n ge matrix in the
l i near order implied b y the cell number sequence. In practice, the process is m uch more complex. I n
some insta nces, an a ffected i nterested party ca n move th rough the cha nge matrix rap i d ly apparently ,
E X A M PLE One affected i nterested party can spend no time whatever i n the "W hy" real ization phase,
bypassing the " Denial, E motional, Acceptance" change phases, and move d i rectly t o the "Com m i t ment" phase.
On the other ha nd, a d i Jfe rent a ffected i nterested party ca n become stuck i ndefi n i tely on the W hy rea l i za ion " "
The typical pattern of progress through the change matrix i s illustrated i n Figure 5.
Denial 1 5 9 13 17
Emotional 6 10 14 18
Acceptance
7 11 15 19
/rejection
I
Commitment
20
/opposition
T he current change matrix cell position is identified s imply as the selection of the applicable realization
phase/change phase comb[ nation.
8.3 Aggregation of affected interested parties change matrix positions to h igher l evels
8.3 . 1 Genera l
I n order t o monitor a nd track the progress of affected interested party interventions, it is importa nt to
be able to determ i ne a composite view of this progress through the change matrix.
The nature of the change matrix aggregation problem is illustrated i n Figures Q , 1. a n d B..
I I
I I IIIIIIIII 2°
1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I lj 1 1 1 1 20
Figu re 7 - A ffected i nterested party n (ach ieved cel l posit ion)
By what process can an aggregate cell position be determined, so that the aggregated position is a
fa i t h fu l ind icator of the va rious positions of t h · a ffected i n terested pa rties' progress along the cha nge
matrix?
l m-� I I I I I l?I I I I I I I I I� 20
Figure 8 - Aggregated celJ position
Th ree possible approach!:'s a re ident ified in order to determ i ne an aggregat cel l pos i t ion. g i ven that
there are two or more a ffected i nterested parties that need to be considered.
8.3.3 . 1 General
select the first (topmost) record and identify the change matrix cell position of the a ffected
interested pa rty;
end.
EXAM PLE
1 2 3
A ffected i nterested part y Weighting Rated cha nge matri cel l position
1 20 7
2 s 16
Aggregated c e l l position : 7
end.
EX A M P LE
1 2 3
A ffected interested party Weighting Rated change matrix cel l position
1 1 00 16
2 10 7
Aggregated cell position: 16
The aggregated cell position i s the median value of all affected i nterested parties.
E X A M PLE
1 2 3
A ffected interested party Weighting Hated cha nge matrix cel l position
1 1 7
2 1 16
OTE I n this context, rou n d i n g dow nwa rds wi l l happen when t he aggregate fractional val ue i s hetween 0
a n d 0,49. Rou n d i ng up w i l l h a ppen when the aggregate fractiona l value is between 0,50 and 0,99.
Annex A
(i n formative)
A.1 Genera l
This annex specifies OCM documentation templates a nd content t hat can be used by orga nizations,
projects or smaller cha nge ma nagement activities. The documentation describes the output of the
processes s peci fied in Clauses 5 to ft
This a n nex can be used by orga nizations when considering a ny forn1 of change to the organ ization.
This annex is i ntended for, but not limited to, change managers, change agents a nd project managers,
pa rticularly those responsible for governi ng, ma naging and implementing OCM activities.
A.2. 1 Overview
A.2 . 2 . 1 General
The OCM pol icy describes the objectives and principles of OCM withi n the organization. It describes
what should be accompl ished when such activ ities are undertaken, but not the circumsta ntially affected
deta ils as to h ow OCM is performed.
The policy provides a framework fo r establishing, reviewing and conti nually i mprov ing the OCM policy.
I nclude the generic items l isted in Clause B.1. and tailor the content as appropriate.
A.2 . 2 . 3 . 1 Objectives of O C M
Establish a n orga nization's high·level intention and approach to ach ieve objectives for, a nd ensu ring
effective control of, the OCM process.
A.2. 2 . 3 . 6 Standard s
Identi fies any standards, or recogn ized i ndustry practices, that a re appl icable within the organization.
Identifies the orga n ization's position on the archiving and reuse of OCM assets.
EXAM PLE The i ntervention defi n ition process i s l i kely to support a usefu l repository o reu sable assets.
A.2 . 3 . 1 Genera l
l nclude the generic i tems listed in Clause B.1 and tailor the content as appropriate.
The strategy is described for the speci fied scope. This section i ncludes statements that are a ppropriate
for all OCM sub-processes to be performed i n a g i ve n OCM act ivi y within the scope of the strat gy.
These i nclude:
a) scope;
b) responsibilit ies and authority, includi ng the change s ponsor and i m mediate p rocess or service
owner;
c) i nterfaces among i n terested parties i nvolved;
d) a pproach to risks and opport u n i ty identification, assessment and risk m i t i ga ti o n activities;
h) resou rces and thei r al location, including human resou rces, tech nical resou rces (infras t ru ct u re)
and tools;
i) identification of tools, methods a nd techniques;
j) tra i n ing;
A.3.1 Overview
The docu ments developed in the management processes comprise the fol lowing types:
a) the external a nd i nternal concerns that a re relevant to the organization and a nalysis of their
i mpac t s;
b) scope of this change scenario;
d) approach to risks and opport unity identification, assessment and risk m itigation activities;
e) schedu les;
f) budgets and cost estimates;
g) responsibilities and authority, including the change sponsor and immediate process or service
owner;
h) identi fication o f the aggregation model.
I nclude the gen ric items listed in Clause B.1. a nd t a i lor t he content as a pprop r i a t e .
b) u n ique reference;
c) application context;
d) goal of the i ntervention;
e) scope of the i n ter ve n t ion ;
A.4.1 Overview
The documents deve loped in the i mplementation processes comprise the fol lowing types:
cha ngr:! pla n (see AA..2) ;
I nclude the generic items l isted in �la.,,.u.....,,.""""". and tailor the content as appropriate.
b) issue scope;
c) issue objective(s);
d) expected oppor u n i ties a nd /o r benefits associated w i t h the scope of a proposed change;
OTE The i n i t i a l v a l u e o f t h e agg regat io n model i s i n h erited from h e v a l u e assigned i n t n e hange objectives
a n d strategy information ite m . By default, t h is value w i l l apply to a l l issues. If prevai l i ng circumstances so
indicate, a d i fferent va l ue can be assigned to this issue.
Include the generic items l is ted in Clause B.l. and tailor the content as appropriate.
T h ree factors sho u l d be present for mea n i n g fu l orga n izat io n a l c h a nge to take place. These factors i n c l u de :
F = in i t ial , concrete steps that can be taken towards realizing the vision.
!f the product of these th ree factors is g reater than R "" re sistanc e then change is feasible.
,
c) the weighting of the a ffected interested party with respect to the cha nge scenario i s i d en ti fi ed ;
NOTE 2 Refer to 8.3...2. for the cha nge matrix cel l aggregation pro b lem .
d) he i n itial position of the a ffected i n terested pa r y on the cha nge matri x is determ ined.
NOTE 3 Refer to .!i.3..3_ for cha nge matrix cell aggregation models.
I nclude the generic items l isted in Claus.e.JlJ. , and tailor the content as appropriate.
I nclude the generic items l isted i n Clause 8.2. a nd tailor the content as appropriate.
I nclude the generic items l isted i n Clause .B..Z,, and tailor the content as appropriate.
A.4.6.2 Affected i n terested party i n te rve ntion change matrix position statements
Include the generic items l isted i n Clause B.1. and tailor the content a s appropriate.
c) issue identifier;
OTE 2 If there is more than a single issue associated with a change scena rio, then c) and d ) can be presented
for each issue associated '"" i t h a change scenario.
l nclude t he generic items listed in Clause B.2. a n d tailor the content a s appropriate.
a) issue identifier;
I nclude the generic items listed in CJaus H.. 1 , and tailor the content as a pp ropriate.
E lements from the cha nge scenario status report and from the cha nge plan status report a re selected
a s app ropriate when preparing cha nge management special ne ds reports.
Annex B
(i n formative)
Un iquely i de n t i fies a version of the item by i ts t i tle and other speci fic i n forma ion such as the date of
issue, the version a nd/or the status (e.g. dra ft, reviewed, corrected, final).
Speci fies the o rga ni za t io n responsible for pre p a r i n g a nd releasing the item. It can a l o i nclude the
author(s).
Identifies the designated party(ies) hav i ng t he responsibil ity for rev iewing a n d approv ing the issu of
the item. It can also i nclude the reviewers and other pertinent role players.
T h i s can i nclude a list i ncluding the present version of the item and a ny predecessor items conta i n i ng
the u nique identi fication of each item, description of item changes w ith respect to the previous item i n
t h e list, reason fo r changes (e.g. audit comments, team review, system changes) a n d t h e n a m e and role
of the party(ies) making the cha nges (e.g. author, project m a nager, system o w ne r].
B . 1 .6 Introd uction
An explanatory section providing i n formation about t he context and structure of the item.
B.1.7 Scope
Iden t i fies the extent of the coverage of the subject a rea by the i em and describes a ny i nclusions,
exclusions, assumptions a nd/or l i m i tations.
B.1 .8 References
The references can be separated into external references that are imposed from outside the organization
and i nternal references that a re obl igations that a rise from within the organ ization.
B. 1 .9 Glossary
This section can be a n a n nex, or it can refer to another item providing a general glossary.
T h i s information identi fies elements associated \•V ith temporal hi story and ow nership in formation of
the record.
B.2 .4 Created by
Annex e
(i n formative)
C.1 Genera l
This a nnex provides a clause- level mapping of t h i s document and I SO 900 1 . I n addition, the associated
i n formation item is iden t i fied.
C.2 Associ ati o ns betwee n the clauses of this document and ISO 9 0 0 1 cla uses
TableC.1 identifies the clauses of this document with the i m p l ied clauses from ISO 9 0 0 1 , and the impl ied
f n format ion item.
This
Description I SO 9 0 0 1 : 2 0 1 5 Descript ion I n format i on item
docu ment
.5.d Deve loping OCM pol icy 4.2 Understanding the needs A.2...3. OCM s trategy
and strategy and expectations of
i n teres ted part ies
4.3 Detenn i n ing the scope of A23. OCM s t rategy
the qual ity management
system
4.4.1 A.U OCM policy
'5.1.1 General IA.2...3. OCM strategy
5.1.2 Customer focu s A...2....3. O C M s t rategy
5.3 Organizational roles, A.2...3. O C l strategy
responsibili ties and
authorities
7.2 Competence A:lu2. OCM pol icy
8.1 Operational plann ing and A..2..3. O C M s trategy
control
9.3 . 1 G enera l A.Li OC l st rategy
9.3 . 2 M a nagemen review i nputs A.2....3_ oc s t rategy
.6.2. Cha nge scenario process
.6..2.1 O utcomes 4.3 Determ i n i n g the scope o f A..3...1 Cha nge obj ec t i ves
the qua l i ty m a nagement and strategy
system
6.1.1 &U Cha nge objectives
and strategy
6.2.2 A..3...1 Cha nge object i ves
and st ra te gy
Table C . 1 (continued)
This
Description ISO 9001 :20 1 5 Description I n formation item
document
I
6.3 Pla n n i ng of cha nges A..ll C ha nge objectives
a nd stra egy
.6...2...13. Determ i n e c h , nge 6.2.2 A,.ll Cha nge objectives
!>C lo' ll<tl i u l.J �11efil:> d u tl :> L I d legy
Table C . 1 (continued)
T h is
Desc ription I SO 9 0 0 1 :2 0 1 S Description I n formation item
d ocument
.u A ffected i nterested
party i dent ificat io n
process
7.3.3 O u tcomes 4.2 Understa nding t h e needs A.2.3 OCM strategy
a n d expectations of
interested part ies
8.5.2 I denti fication and A.3A I nteres ted party
t raceabil ity com m u n ication record
7.3.4 Activities and tasks
7.3.4. 2 Determine affected 4.2 Understan ding t h e needs A..2....3._ O C M strategy
i nterested pa rty a n d expectat ions of
i m pacts i nteres ted pa rt ies
8.5.2 I denti fication <l n d A..3..A I nterested party
tracea hi! it y com m u n ication record
1..-3..U Determine a ffected 4.2 Understanding t h e needs A.U OCM strategy
i nterested pa rty a n d expectations of
cha nge read i ness i nterested part ie s
-7..:iM Dete r m i ne a ffec ted 4.2 U nderstanding the needs A..LJ OCM strategy
i nterested party and expectations of
aggregation weight ing interested pa r ties
1..3A...5 Determine affected 4.2 U nderstanding t h e needs A..2...3. OCM strategy
i n terested pa rty cha nge a nd e pecta ions of
matr i x initial position i nterested parties
M. A ffected i n terested
party i ntervent io n
process
M,,l O tJtcomes 8.1 O perational p l a n n ing a n d AA.A A ffected
control interested party
interven t ion plan
8.2.1 Cu stom er co m m u n ic at i o n AAA A ffected
interested part y
intervention plan
8.5.2 Identi fication a nd M,-5. Affected
t raceabil ity interested party
intervent ion status
� Activities and tasks
li.1:...2. Determine a ffected 4.2 Understanding the needs &3-3. I n terested party
i nterested pa rty and expectations of profi le
intervent ion cha nge interested parties
m atri x positions
Table U identifies the clauses from I S O 9 0 0 1 associated with the impl ied clauses of this document
togeth r w i t h the i m pl ied i n formation i tem.
ISO This
Descript ion D escription I n formation item
9001:2015 document
Table C . 2 (continued)
ISO This
D escription Descript ion I n formation item
9001 : 2 0 1 5 docu ment
Table C . 2 (continued)
ISO This
D escription Description I n formation i tem
900 1 :201 5 document
Table C . 2 (continued)
ISO This
D escription Description I n formation item
9001 : 2 0 1 5 docu ment
8.1 Operat ional plan n i ng a n d -5.,5 Developing O C M policy and A...U OCM po l icy
cont rol : s t rategy
1A3 O u tcomes AAA Affected
i nterested party
i n t ervention plan
lA.U Determ i ne affected i nterested A.AA Affected
par y intervention schedule i n terested pa r ty
d ates i n tervention plan
ll&.._4 Dete r m i ne a ffected i n t ere sted A.!,4 A ffected
p ;.l r t y i n h'!rVP-n h o n s 1 ::H 1 1 s i n t P.r�s 1 P.<l p;:i r 1·y
i nterven ion plan
8.2 R e q u i r e m e n t s for products
a nd services
8 . .2 . 1 Cu stomer com m u n i ca tion Z.4,J. O u t co m es A...4:..4
. A ffectcd
i nt erested pa r ty
i nterve n t ion plan
7.4.4.2 Determ i ne a ffected i nterested A.4.4 A ffected
party intervention change i nterested pa r ty
m a t r i x positions i ntervention plan
1AA..S. Determ i ne affocted inte rest · AAA Affected
ed party i ntervention clos i n g i nt erested pa r ·y
cha nge matrix position i ntervention plan
1..5....4.Z Determ ine cha nge ma nagement aA.Z Change
report i ng status scenario status
report
8.2.2 Det e r m i n i n g the requ i r e -
8.2.3.2
8. 2 .4 C h anges to requirements
for products and services
8. 3 Design a n d development of
products a n d services
8.3.1 General
8.3.2 Design a nd development
p l a n n i ng
8.3.3 Des ig n and d evel o pme n t
i npu ts
8.3.4 Design and development
controls
8.3.S Design a nd development
outputs
8 . 3.6 Design a nd developme n t
cha nges
8.4 Cont rol of exter n a l l y
provided pro esses,
products and serv ic es
8.4. 1 G ene ra l
Table C . 2 (continued)
ISO This
D escription Description I n formation i tem
900 1 :201 5 document
8.7. 2
Table C . 2 (continued)
ISO This
D escription Description I n formation item
9001 : 2 0 1 5 docu ment
Bib liography
[3 ] I SO 9004:20 18, Quality management - Quality ofan or9anization - Guidance to achieve sustained
success
[ 4] l SO/ I EC/ lEEE 247 74:2021, Systems and software engineering - life cycle management -
Specification for process description
[S] BEC K H A R D , R, H A R R IS, R.T. Organizational Transitions: Managin9 Complex Chan9e. Addison"
We sl ey Publish i ng Company, 1987
[6] K U I P E RS, B.S., H IGGS, M . , KICKE RT, w., T U M M ERS, L., GRAN DlA, J., VAN DER VOET, ]. T h e management
of change i n public organizations: A l iterature review. Public administration. 2014, 92(1), pp. 1 -20
[7] Ros E N BAU t , D., MORE, E ., STEA N E , P. Plan ned orga n isational cha nge ma nag(:!ment: Forward to
t h e past? An exploratory l iterature review. jou rn al of Organizational Change Mana9ement. 2 0 1 8 ,
I CS 03.1 2 0 . 1 0
Price based o n 4 1 pages