Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10 views

    MCAT - Cost of Quality Analysis (1) .XLSX Ks

    Uploaded by

    Muhammad Jazib
    The document analyzes the cost of quality for an MCAT preparation process. It found that 66.7% of the 18 samples analyzed were defective, missing the target specification of 100 with a lower specification limit of 98 and upper limit of 102. The process was only achieving 33% of its shift production target of 10,000 units due to the high defect rate. This resulted in a total cost of poor quality of $20,000,000 based on the production target and a per unit rework cost of $10.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    MCAT - Cost of Quality Analysis (1) .XLSX Ks

    Uploaded by

    Muhammad Jazib
    10 views2 pages
    The document analyzes the cost of quality for an MCAT preparation process. It found that 66.7% of the 18 samples analyzed were defective, missing the target specification of 100 with a lower specification limit of 98 and upper limit of 102. The process was only achieving 33% of its shift production target of 10,000 units due to the high defect rate. This resulted in a total cost of poor quality of $20,000,000 based on the production target and a per unit rework cost of $10.

    Original Title

    MCAT - Cost of Quality Analysis (1).xlsx ks (1) (1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document analyzes the cost of quality for an MCAT preparation process. It found that 66.7% of the 18 samples analyzed were defective, missing the target specification of 100 with a lower specification limit of 98 and upper limit of 102. The process was only achieving 33% of its shift production target of 10,000 units due to the high defect rate. This resulted in a total cost of poor quality of $20,000,000 based on the production target and a per unit rework cost of $10.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    10 views2 pages

    MCAT - Cost of Quality Analysis (1) .XLSX Ks

    Uploaded by

    Muhammad Jazib
    The document analyzes the cost of quality for an MCAT preparation process. It found that 66.7% of the 18 samples analyzed were defective, missing the target specification of 100 with a lower specification limit of 98 and upper limit of 102. The process was only achieving 33% of its shift production target of 10,000 units due to the high defect rate. This resulted in a total cost of poor quality of $20,000,000 based on the production target and a per unit rework cost of $10.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    MCAT Cost of Quality Analysis

    Prepared by: Khalifa Salem


    Date: 02/04/2021

    CTQ Dimension being analyzed:


    SPECIFICATIONS
    Target: 100
    LSL: 98
    USL: 102
    Fraction Defects Able to be Reworked: 1.00
    Fraction Defects Not Reworkable: 0.00

    % DEFECTIVE
    Number of Samples: 18
    Number Defective: 12
    Fraction Defective: 0.667
    Precent Defective (Fraction x100) 66.7%

    PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS (are we meeting demand?)


    Average Cycle Time: 2.75
    Work Hours Per Shift 8
    Total Break Time Per Shift (non productive) 0.5
    Productive Hours Per Shift 7.5
    Minutes Per Shift: 450
    Seconds Per Shift: 27000
    Annual Production Days 300
    Shift Production Target 10000
    Actual Units Produced Per Shift (based on cycle time) 9818.18
    RFT (Right First Time Units) = Units Produced * (1 - Fraction Defective) 3272.73
    Percent of Shift Target Achieved 0.33

    COST OF QUALITY ANALYSIS (based on production target)


    Per Unit Rework Cost $ 10.00
    Per Unit Scrap Cost $ -
    Realized Rework Cost (based on target) $ 20,000,000.00
    Realized Scrap Cost (based on target) $ -
    TOTAL COST OF POOR QUALITY $ 20,000,000.00
    (units)
    inches
    inches
    inches

    # Samples
    # Defects
    Fraction Defective
    Fraction Defective

    seconds
    Hours
    Hours
    Hours
    Minutes
    seconds
    Days / yr
    units
    units
    units
    Ideal = 1.00

    dollars
    dollars
    dollars
    dollars
    dollars

    You might also like