Chapter 9
Chapter 9
Horizontal Integration
Vertical Integration
Strategic Outsourcing
2
Corporate-Level Strategy(1)
3
Corporate-Level Strategy(2)
Their concern is with building and managing the corporate portfolio of business
to maximize corporate profitability
4
Corporate-Level Strategy(3)
5
Horizontal Integration : Single-Industry Corporate Strategy (1)
For many companies, profitable growth and expansion often entail finding
ways to successfully compete within a single market or industry over time.
It allows a company to focus all of its managerial, financial, technological, and functional resources
and capabilities on competing successfully in one area.
A company does not make the mistake of entering new industries in which its existing resources and
capabilities create little value and/or where a whole new set of competitive industry forces—present
unanticipated threats.
6
Horizontal Integration : Single-Industry Corporate Strategy (2)
7
Horizontal Integration : Single-Industry Corporate Strategy (3)
One corporate-level strategy that has been widely used to help managers
strengthen their company’s business model is horizontal integration
8
Horizontal Integration
Horizontal Integration
• The process of acquiring or merging with industry competitors to achieve
the competitive advantages that arise from a large size and scope of
operations.
• e.g. Lenovo acquired PC department of IBM
A Firm A Firm
A or B C Firm
Firm
B Firm B Firm
• Acquiring or merging with a competitor helps to eliminate excess capacity in an industry, which
triggers price wars
• A company becomes a much larger buyer of suppliers’ products and uses this as leverage to
bargain down the price it pays for its inputs, thereby lowering its cost structure.
• When a company has greater ability to raise prices to buyers or bargain down the price paid for
inputs, it has obtained increased market power
11
Problems with Horizontal Integration
The company comes into conflict with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the
government agency responsible for enforcing antitrust laws.
12
Vertical Integration
13
Increasing Profitability through Vertical Integration
Vertical integration increases product differentiation, lowers costs, and reduces
industry competition when it:
14
Facilitating Investments in Specialized Assets
A specialized asset is one that is designed to perform a specific task and whose value is
significantly reduced in its next-best use.
Companies invest in specialized assets because these assets allow them to lower their
cost structure or to better differentiate their products to facilitate premium pricing.
Apple
• iOS
Toyota
• invest in specialized equipment to lower manufacturing costs
15
Enhancing Product Quality
By entering industries at other stages of the value-added chain, a company can
often enhance the quality of the products in its core business and strengthen its
differentiation advantage.
Ownership of retail outlets may be necessary if the required standards of after-sales service
for complex products are to be maintained.
• Apple stores
Firms found that local suppliers lacked the capability to produce ingredients of the quality
it demanded
• McDonald in Russia: It was then forced to vertically integrate through the local food
industry on a heroic scale and construct the world’s largest food-processing plant
16
Improved Scheduling
Vertical integration makes a firm quicker, easier, and more cost-effective to plan,
coordinate, and schedule the transfer of a product
• Ford integrated backward into steel foundries, iron ore shipping, and iron ore
production.
• Deliveries at Ford were coordinated to such an extent that iron ore unloaded at
Ford’s steel foundries on the Great Lakes was turned into engine blocks within
24 hours, which lowered Ford’s cost structure.
17
Problems with Vertical Integration
18
Increasing Cost Structure
Firm can raise costs if, over time, it continues to purchase inputs from company-owned
suppliers when low cost independent suppliers that can supply the same inputs exist.
Because in-house suppliers do not have to compete with independent,
outside suppliers for orders, they have much less incentive to look for
new ways to reduce operating costs or increase component quality
• In-house suppliers simply pass on cost increases to the other divisions
Why would a company-
owned supplier develop • Transfer pricing: the price that one division of a company charges
such a high cost structure? another division for its products
Because Sony was locked into the outdated CRT technology, it was slow to
recognize that the future was flatscreen LCD screens and did not exit the CRT
business.
20XX 年 募資簡報 20
Demand Unpredictability
If demand for cars suddenly plummets, the carmaker may find itself
burdened with warehouses full of component parts it no longer needs
21
Alternatives to Vertical Integration: Cooperative Relationships
Is it possible to obtain the differentiation and cost-savings advantages associated
with vertical integration without having to bear the problems and costs associated
with this strategy?
Advantages Disadvantages
23
Strategic Alliances and Long-term Contracting
Strategic alliances: Long-term agreements between two or more companies to jointly
develop new products or processes
Both companies agree to make specialized investments and work jointly to find ways to
lower costs or increase product quality
A strategic alliance helps firms to avoid the problems (bureaucratic costs) that arise from
managerial inefficiencies
24
Strategies to Build Long-Term Cooperative Relationships
Credible Maintaining
Hostage taking
Commitments Market Discipline
25
Hostage Taking
Means of exchanging valuable resources to guarantee that each partner to an
agreement will keep its side of the bargain
27
Maintaining Market Discipline
All contracts are periodically renegotiated, usually every three to five years, so the
supplier knows that if it fails to live up to its commitments, its partner may refuse
to renew the contract
Many companies use a parallel sourcing policy and enter into a long-term contract
with at least two suppliers for the same component
28
Strategic Outsourcing (1)
29
Strategic Outsourcing (2)
Many companies outsource activities that managers regard as being “noncore” or
“nonstrategic,” meaning they are not a source of a company’s distinctive competencies
and competitive advantage
These products are made under contract at low-cost, global locations by contract
manufacturers that specialize in low-cost assembly
30
Benefits of Outsourcing
20XX 年 募資簡報 31
Lower Cost Structure
Specialists are often able to perform an activity at a lower cost than the company
They are able to realize scale economies or other efficiencies not available to the company
Specialists are also likely to obtain the cost savings associated with learning effects
• Because a firm is manufacturing similar products for several different companies, it is able to
build up cumulative volume more rapidly
• It learns how to manage and operate the manufacturing process more efficiently than any of its
clients could
32
Increase Product Differentiation (1)
For this to occur, the quality of the activity performed by specialists must be
greater than if that same activity was performed by the company
Reliability Excellence
33
Increase Product Differentiation (2)
Reliability
• A specialist may be able to achieve a lower error rate in performing an activity,
because it focuses solely on that activity and has developed a strong distinctive
competency in it
• Flextronics (偉創力) have adopted Six Sigma methodologies and driven down
the defect rate associated with manufacturing a product
Excellence
• Carmakers often outsource specific kinds of vehicle component design
activities, such as microchips or headlights, to specialists that have earned a
reputation for design excellence in this particular activity
• JUSTTOP (佳欣光電)
34
Focus on the Core Business
Companies can enhance their core competencies and create more value for their
customers
• Apple & Nike focused on building its competencies in product design and
marketing and sales
35
Risks of Outsourcing
Holdup
Increased Competition
36
Holdup
Holdup refers to the risk that a company will become too dependent upon a
specialist provider of an outsourced activity
The specialist will use this fact to raise prices beyond some previously agreed-
upon rate
37
Increased Competition
The contract manufacturer can progress down its own learning curve
Contract manufacturer increase the scope of their activities over time, adding a wider range of
services
Eventually, they produce their own and products in competition with their customers
38
Loss of Information and Forfeited Learning Opportunities
A company that is not careful can lose important competitive information when it outsources an
activity
Many computer hardware and software companies have outsourced their customer technical support
function to specialists
• A critical point of contact with the customer, and a source of important feedback, is lost
Customer complaints can be useful pieces of information and valuable inputs into future product
design
• Losing opportunities for improving its capabilities in product design
39
The End~~
20XX 年 募資簡報 40