Ijiset V7 I2 10
Ijiset V7 I2 10
Ijiset V7 I2 10
Department of Quality Assurance, Delhi institute of pharmaceutical science and research, Saket , New delhi- 10017,
India
E.mail: khatrimonika97@gmail.com
Abstract:
Pharmaceutical industry is one of the most regulated industries. The implementation of quality
to the market. This review article elaborates about pharmaceutical quality unit, ICH Q10, its
objectives, elements and pillars. Audits, CAPA, Change control and Management review is
Q10.
Introduction
Delivering the quality and safety products to market is the foremost need of pharmaceutical
industry. Failing to its adherence can lead to credibility and brand image loss of the organization
in product recall cases. There are several regulatory agencies such as the Food and Drug
Administration, which looks upon the quality and safety aspects of pharmaceutical products.
Each pharmaceutical industry needs to adhere these standards to sell their products in the
respective country. One such standard is the International Conference on Harmonization Q10
model, which elaborates the efficient pharmaceutical quality system elements. It also emphasizes
99
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 7 Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN (Online) 2348 – 7968 | Impact Factor (2019) – 6.248
www.ijiset.com
There is no single definition of quality. It can be defined by the individuals in their own ways.
The only parameter, which is common in all, is the satisfaction. The manufacturer needs a
product which meets predetermined specifications. Thus, meeting the specifications by a product
represents its quality. Pharmaceutical industry should not compromise with quality as the
humans will utilize these drug products. Thus, safety, purity, identity and quality of product is
highest possible quality level with less recall or adverse events (Percy, 2010).
To develop
quality system
1. ICH Q10
The US, Japan and the European Union accepts the ICH Q10 model, which is recommended, but
not mandatory. Its foundation includes the ICH Q7 guideline, International Organization for
Standardization (ISO) QMS standards and regional good manufacturing practice requirements.
100
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 7 Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN (Online) 2348 – 7968 | Impact Factor (2019) – 6.248
www.ijiset.com
An effective QMS implementation with ICH Q10 model can support in enhancement of quality
expectations. ICH Q10 implementation must have continuous improvement using innovation
throughout the product lifecycle. This can support the association between manufacturing
activities and pharmaceutical development. The ICH Q10 compliance reflects the quality
The ICH Q10 model has developed with three major objectives which include:
adherence by a product.
2. Establishment and maintenance of state of control to design and use effective system to
monitor and control product quality and process parameters. It ensures process continuation
capability.
3. Continual improvement facilitation to identify and implement various changes related with
product quality and process parameters. It also includes innovation to fulfil the quality
2. QMS elements:
The pharmaceutical industry involves several individuals and various activities to produce
specific products. Effective QMS system implementation ensures smooth functioning of each
process which is required to meet the regulatory compliance. The QMS directs the organization
regarding the quality parameters. It covers all the processes related with pharmaceutical industry
101
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 7 Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN (Online) 2348 – 7968 | Impact Factor (2019) – 6.248
www.ijiset.com
such as drug sampling, objectives and policy, analysis and reporting of samples, system
The process to include company policy into procedures, processes and instructions to get
Plan the activities and its implementation as a quality system part to conform the products
The process to monitor and rectify to ensure the development of quality products.
Performance evaluation which also includes the systemic and methodical actions for
Sample
retention
Formulation Product
process discontinuation
Product
Analytical Method storage
Development
Product
Quality control release
and quality
assurance
102
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 7 Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN (Online) 2348 – 7968 | Impact Factor (2019) – 6.248
www.ijiset.com
The pillars of Q10 are accountable for its foundation and includes:
a. Pharmaceutical companies must develop and execute a system to monitor product quality and
b. QMS solution can be audits which ensure continuous monitoring and quality system tracking.
It imparts a benchmarking quality way for various product lines and processes. GMP audits can
uncover any gaps in system. It also streamlines various operations to identify the compliance
Corrective actions can correct the non-compliant events and risk management guides to measure
those actions.
Application of these Q10 pillars along with additional tools by pharmaceutical companies
4. Audits
Regular audits of different operational areas and departments can be scheduled through
company’s QMS. The audit outcomes can be linked with corrective action to determine the
103
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 7 Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN (Online) 2348 – 7968 | Impact Factor (2019) – 6.248
www.ijiset.com
Obtaining the feedback from external and internal sources is another aspect of process
performance and product quality monitoring system. Complaint handling feature of QMS, which
manages handling of complaints in line with FDA guidelines can be utilized to achieve this
feedback.
Post-market feedback involving the investigation of adverse events are recorded during this
feature. It can be linked directly with the CAPA where the adverse event data can be inherited
The products are approved following the specification conformance through testing while
meeting the safety guidelines. The non-conformance feature in Q10 permits the tracking,
be directly generated through the original non-conformance in order to correct systemic issues. It
ensures the non-conformance process streamlining and enhances the end product’s safety.
5. CAPA system:
According to ICH Q10, there must be a CAPA system for complaints, product rejection, audits,
non-conformance. The investigation and determination of root causes of events can be done
through CAPA system. Corrective actions and verification of effective actions can be done using
CAPA system.
104
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 7 Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN (Online) 2348 – 7968 | Impact Factor (2019) – 6.248
www.ijiset.com
The number of CAPAs can be reduced by the utilization of Risk assessment feature. It helps in
filtering out events having critical impact on the organization from that of non-critical events.
Risk mitigation tracking is incorporated under the risk assessment event which ensures the risk
Risk portfolios can be built up by the companies for individual products with the continuous
improvement concept. Past adverse events history along with the risk ranking linked with each
event can be observed using risk portfolio. Pharmaceutical organizations can take assistance
from the previous risk assessment portfolios to eliminate or minimize adverse events.
Q10, each organization must have a change management system to effectively evaluate, approve
A pharmaceutical organization can start the change process through the implementation of
change management feature. The change can be the outcome of a non-conformance, a corrective
action, post-market feedback, an audit or any similar quality incident. Quality data can be taken
and incorporated into project plan for change management (Gaurav Pratap Singh Jadaun, 2015).
7. Management review:
Management reviews ensure the effectively management of process performance and product
quality throughout the lifecycle. It also imparts assurance that the quality and compliance is
105
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 7 Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN (Online) 2348 – 7968 | Impact Factor (2019) – 6.248
www.ijiset.com
completely met by the organization. Management reviews is a medium through which senior
There is a huge data available in QMS related to corrective actions, audits, non-conformance,
adverse events, etc. There can be missing links on continuous improvement in the absence of
clear mode to evaluate the data. It can lead in delaying of management’s decision-making
abilities.
Reporting system feature supports the organization to better understand the quality challenges
and take effective decisions to produce quality and safe products. It can assist in problem
Various inherited benefits can be achieved using automated QMS systems such as process
Scalability: Each Pharmaceutical organization is not limited to only one facility. Various
facilities are available at different sites. An effective QMS must impart the processes which can
fulfill the needs of each facility through a common platform available at corporate location.
Flexibility: The system must be flexible enough to adapt to business processes. The seamless
change and improvisation can be effectively done using automated QMS system. A centralized
106
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 7 Issue 2, February 2020
ISSN (Online) 2348 – 7968 | Impact Factor (2019) – 6.248
www.ijiset.com
Conclusion
implementation. Adoption of ICH Q10 though, not mandatory, can permit a pharmaceutical
The major Q10 elements and specific points to implement QMS features have been
elucidated in this article. The discussion and application of four QMS pillars- process and
product monitoring system, CAPA, change management system and management review are
also covered.
References
1. Lachman L, Hanna SA, Lin K Quality control and assurance. The Theory and Practice of
Industrial Pharmacy. 2nd Edn, Varghese Publishing House, Bombay, India, 1976,
pp. 804-855.
2. Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System , U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration Centre for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)
Centre for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) , 2009; 2-19.
3. Gaurav Pratap Singh Jadaun, H. K. Quality Management System in Testing Laboratories.
Journal of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, 2015,53-56.
4. Neetu Dubey, H. G. . Pharmaceutical Quality Management System: Current Concept . Journal
of Advanced Pharmacy Education & Research,2011, 120-124.
5. Percy, B. . Best Practices of a Pharmaceutical Quality Management System . Informa UK
Limited, 2010
6. Priyambada Pandey, A. G. (January). Quality Management System in Drug Industry: A
Review. Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, 2018.
7. S Sharma, R. B. . Pharmaceutical Quality Management System: A review. International
Journal of Drug Regulatory Affairs, 2014, 67-78.
107