Heat
Heat
Heat
Problem Definition
Description
Heading
Company:
Location:
Service of Unit: Our Reference:
Item No.: Your Reference:
Date: Rev No.: Job No.:
Remarks
Application Options
Calculation mode Design (Sizing)
Location of hot fluid Shell side
Select geometry based on this dimensional standard US
Calculation method Advanced method
Process Data
Hot Side Cold Side
Fluid name Air Water
In Out In Out
Mass flow rate kg/h 20000
Temperature °C 100 60 30 40
Vapor mass fraction 1 1 1 1
Pressure (absolute) kgf/cm² 1.85 1.73 3 2.868
Pressure at liquid surface in column kgf/cm²
Heat exchanged kcal/h
Adjust if over-specified Heat load Heat load
Estimated pressure drop kgf/cm² 0.12 0.132
Allowable pressure drop kgf/cm² 0.193 0.51
Fouling resistance m²-h-C/kcal 0 0
C kcal/kg
100 17.9 1
96.92 17.16 1
93.85 16.42 1
90.77 15.67 1
87.69 14.93 1
84.62 14.19 1
81.54 13.45 1
78.46 12.71 1
75.38 11.98 1
72.31 11.24 1
69.23 10.5 1
66.15 9.76 1
63.08 9.02 1
60 8.28 1
Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating Shell & Tube V11 Page 4
File: C:\Users\ladwa\Desktop\HeatExch.EDR Printed: 24-11-2023 at 18:20:33
Company:
Location:
Service of Unit: Our Reference:
Item No.: Your Reference:
Date: Rev No.: Job No.:
100
96.92
93.85
90.77
87.69
84.62
81.54
78.46
75.38
72.31
69.23
66.15
63.08
60
Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating Shell & Tube V11 Page 5
File: C:\Users\ladwa\Desktop\HeatExch.EDR Printed: 24-11-2023 at 18:20:33
Company:
Location:
Service of Unit: Our Reference:
Item No.: Your Reference:
Date: Rev No.: Job No.:
100
96.92
93.85
90.77
87.69
84.62
81.54
78.46
75.38
72.31
69.23
66.15
63.08
60
2.868
Aspen property method PENG-ROB
Aspen free-water method STEAM-TA
Aspen water solubility 3
Aspen flash option Vapor-Liquid-Liquid
Aspen Plus or Aspen Properties run file
Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating Shell & Tube V11 Page 7
File: C:\Users\ladwa\Desktop\HeatExch.EDR Printed: 24-11-2023 at 18:20:33
Company:
Location:
Service of Unit: Our Reference:
Item No.: Your Reference:
Date: Rev No.: Job No.:
C kcal/kg
30 -3772.24 0
32 -3770.22 0
34 -3768.2 0
36 -3766.18 0
38 -3764.16 0
40 -3762.14 0
30
32
34
36
38
40
Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating Shell & Tube V11 Page 8
File: C:\Users\ladwa\Desktop\HeatExch.EDR Printed: 24-11-2023 at 18:20:33
Company:
Location:
Service of Unit: Our Reference:
Item No.: Your Reference:
Date: Rev No.: Job No.:
30
32
34
36
38
40
Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating Shell & Tube V11 Page 9
File: C:\Users\ladwa\Desktop\HeatExch.EDR Printed: 24-11-2023 at 18:20:33
Company:
Location:
Service of Unit: Our Reference:
Item No.: Your Reference:
Date: Rev No.: Job No.:
Geometry 1
Exchanger Type
Tubes
Baffles
Longitudinal Baffle
Window length at rear head for F, G, H shells (Rw) mm
Window length at front head for G, H shells (Fw) mm
Window length at center for H shells (Cw) mm
Baffle thickness mm
Percent leakage across longitudinal baffle
Deresonating Baffles
Number of deresonating baffles
Largest deresonating baffle-baffle or baffle-shell distance mm
Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating Shell & Tube V11 Page 12
File: C:\Users\ladwa\Desktop\HeatExch.EDR Printed: 24-11-2023 at 18:20:33
Company:
Location:
Service of Unit: Our Reference:
Item No.: Your Reference:
Date: Rev No.: Job No.:
Geometry 2
Baffles
Bundle
Tube layout option New (optimum) layout Open distance at top of layout mm
Main input / Tube layout inconsistencies Set default (use layout) Open distance at bottom of layout mm
Full or normal bundle Normal bundle Open distance on left side of layout mm
Tube pattern 30-Triangular Open distance on right side of layout mm
Tube pitch mm 23.81 Shell ID to outer tube limit diametric clearance mm
Tube passes Outer tube limit diameter mm
Pass layout orientation Program Horizontal pass partition width mm
Pass layout Mixed (H) Vertical pass partition width mm
Tube layout symmetry Standard symmetry Number of horizontal pass partition lanes
Number of sealing strip pairs Number of vertical pass partition lanes
Orientation of U-bends Undefined
Minimum U-bend diameter mm
Cleaning lane or tube alignment Unaligned
Number of tie rods
Tie rod diameter mm
Spacer diameter mm
Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating Shell & Tube V11 Page 13
File: C:\Users\ladwa\Desktop\HeatExch.EDR Printed: 24-11-2023 at 18:20:33
Company:
Location:
Service of Unit: Our Reference:
Item No.: Your Reference:
Date: Rev No.: Job No.:
Nozzles
Shell Side
Tube Side
Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating Shell & Tube V11 Page 14
File: C:\Users\ladwa\Desktop\HeatExch.EDR Printed: 24-11-2023 at 18:20:33
Company:
Location:
Service of Unit: Our Reference:
Item No.: Your Reference:
Date: Rev No.: Job No.:
Geometry 3
Impingement Protection
Impingement protection device None
Impingement plate diameter mm
Impingement plate length (parallel to tube axis) mm
Impingement plate width (normal to tube axis) mm
Impingement plate thickness mm
Impingement plate distance in from shell ID mm
Impingement plate clearance to tube edge mm
Impingement plate perforated area %
Thermosiphon Piping
Pipework loss calculation Set default
Percent of driving head lost in inlet line
Percent of driving head lost in outlet line
Construction Spec
Materials
Cylinder - hot side Carbon Steel
Cylinder - cold side Carbon Steel
Tubesheet Carbon Steel
Double tubesheet (inner) Set Default
Baffles Carbon Steel
Tube material Carbon Steel
Specifications
Design Code ASME Code Sec VIII Div 1
Service class Normal
TEMA class R - refinery service
Material standard ASME
Dimensional standard ANSI - American
Use BPVC VIII Div 2 Class 1 or Class 2 No
Hot side Cold side
Design pressure (gauge) kgf/cm² 3.515 3.515
Design temperature °C 137.78 76.67
Vacuum design pressure (gauge) kgf/cm²
Test pressure (gauge) kgf/cm²
Corrosion allowance mm 3.18 3.18
Radiography Spot Spot
Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating Shell & Tube V11 Page 16
File: C:\Users\ladwa\Desktop\HeatExch.EDR Printed: 24-11-2023 at 18:20:33
Company:
Location:
Service of Unit: Our Reference:
Item No.: Your Reference:
Date: Rev No.: Job No.:
Program Options1
Design Options
Maximum exit entrainment ratio (mass liquid/vapor) (pool boilers only) 0.02
Allow local temperature cross Yes
U-bend area will be considered effective for heat transfer Set default
Fraction of tube area submerged for shell side condensers
Weir height above bundle for kettle reboiler mm
Correlations
Condensation Options
Desuperheating heat transfer method Wet wall
Condensation heat transfer model HTFS - Silver-Bell
Vapor shear heat transfer enhancement Use vapor shear enhancement
Liquid subcooling heat transfer/vertical Not Used
Priority for condenser outlet temperature (mixtures) Vapor-Gas
Vaporization Options
Subcooled boiling accounted for in Heat transfer & pressure drop
Post dryout heat transfer determined yes
Program Options 2
Enhancements
Shell side enhancements
Enhancement identification
CalculationOptions
Maximum number of Iterations 100
Convergence tolerance - heat load 0.0001
Convergence tolerance - pressure 0.0001
Relaxation parameter 0.5
Calculation grid resolution Medium
Convergence criterion Stop when fully converged
Calculation step size 0.2
Pressure calculation option - hot side Outlet, with minimum
Pressure calculation option - cold side Outlet, with minimum
Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating Shell & Tube V11 Page 20
File: C:\Users\ladwa\Desktop\HeatExch.EDR Printed: 24-11-2023 at 18:20:33
Company:
Location:
Service of Unit: Our Reference:
Item No.: Your Reference:
Date: Rev No.: Job No.:
The value specified for Application under Program Definition | Application Options for stream 2
indicates that the stream is a single phase. If properties have been generated using Aspen Properties
Input Warning 1066
or BJAC, they are obtained for that single phase even if the package would have otherwise returned
properties for other phases.
A default allocation of Hot stream 1: to the shellside has been made. It is estimated that the chances
of this being correct are about 55 percent. Potentially important factors, such as a fluid being
Input Warning 1062
hazardous, or having material compatibility problems, could not be allowed for. Such fluids would
usually go on the tubeside.
No Maximum Allowable Pressure Drop was specified for either stream. Estimated values of 0.193 kgf/
cm2 (hot side) and 0.51 kgf/cm2 (cold side) were used. Design results are usually very susceptible to
Input Warning 1063
at least one of these values, and the estimates may not match your process requirements. Treat the
exchanger designs produced with caution.
You did not input any fouling resistances. Fouling will reduce the calculated exchanger duty, or
Input Warning 1179
increase the exchanger size needed to achieve the specified duty.
Stream 2 has been identified as either a liquid or a vapor application, but Physical Properties data
Input Warning 1049
have only been supplied for the other phase.
For stream 2 at pressure 3 kgf/cm2, the specified temperature 30 C and quality 1 are inconsistent.
Note 1855
The quality has been reset to 0.
For stream 2 at pressure 2.868 kgf/cm2, the specified temperature 40 C and quality 1 are
Note 1855
inconsistent. The quality has been reset to 0.
The consolidated process conditions for Stream 1, prior to the main calculations, give a heat load of
Note 1860 -192225 kcal/h, for a flow of 20000 kg/h, with outlet temperature 60 C and quality (vapor mass
fraction) 1.
The consolidated process conditions for Stream 2, prior to the main calculations, give a heat load of
Note 1860 192225 kcal/h, for a flow of 19035 kg/h, with outlet temperature 40 C and quality (vapor mass
fraction) 0.
The calculated rho v squared of 2303 kg/(m*s2) within the shellside inlet nozzle exceeds the TEMA
Operation Warning 1341
recommended value of 2232 kg/(m*s2).
Advisory 1446 The Advanced calculation has converged after 23 iterations
Note 1701 Design calculation successfully completed.
Flow induced vibration analysis has identified problems: Fluid Elastic Instability: 5 warnings, of which
Operation Warning 1611
2 serious; Resonance Assessments: 11 warnings, of which 0 serious.
The HTFS and/or TEMA flow induced vibration analysis has identified the possibility of acoustic
Note 1615 resonance. You should consider using a deresonating plate, especially if there is resonance of the
vortex shedding or turbulent buffeting frequencies with both the acoustic and natural frequencies
One or more of the calculated shell side Rho-V-Squared values exceeds the TEMA limit. Please take
Operation Warning 1388
a look at the Flow Analysis page.
Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating Shell & Tube V11 Page 21
File: C:\Users\ladwa\Desktop\HeatExch.EDR Printed: 24-11-2023 at 18:20:33
Company:
Location:
Service of Unit: Our Reference:
Item No.: Your Reference:
Date: Rev No.: Job No.:
The number of baffles 2 in a shellside flow path is small. Some of the assumptions in the Shell&Tube
Results Warning 1902
thermal model and temperature difference calculation are less valid than normal.
The ratio 1.468085 of an end space length to the baffle space is larger than normal. Shellside heat
transfer and pressure drop calculations may be less accurate than normal, especially if there is a
Results Warning 1903
small number of baffles. Note that the fraction of the overall resistance to heat transfer due to the
shellside is 0.5909004.
Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating Shell & Tube V11 Page 22
File: C:\Users\ladwa\Desktop\HeatExch.EDR Printed: 24-11-2023 at 18:20:33
Company:
Location:
Service of Unit: Our Reference:
Item No.: Your Reference:
Date: Rev No.: Job No.:
Optimization Path
Area Tube
Item Size Actual Reqd. Shell Dp Ratio Tube Dp Ratio Pitch No. No. P S Price
ratio Pass
1 660.4 2438.4 981.1 2.49 0.182 0.94 0.048 0.09 596.9 2 1 505 1 1 1522788
2 660.4 2438.4 921.5 2.65 0.186 0.96 0.049 0.1 596.9 2 2 508 1 1 1529134
3 685.8 2438.4 853.5 2.86 0.176 0.91 0.048 0.09 596.9 2 1 572 1 1 1632700
4 685.8 2438.4 906.9 2.69 0.175 0.91 0.049 0.1 596.9 2 2 548 1 1 1613340
5 711.2 2438.4 782.2 3.12 0.171 0.88 0.048 0.09 596.9 2 1 637 1 1 1734646
6 711.2 2438.4 843.3 2.89 0.179 0.93 0.049 0.1 596.9 2 2 608 1 1 1711070
7 736.6 2438.4 757.6 3.22 0.166 0.86 0.048 0.09 596.9 2 1 669 1 1 1819361
8 736.6 2438.4 791.5 3.08 0.168 0.87 0.049 0.1 596.9 2 2 660 1 1 1816072
9 438.15 1828.8 1148.7 1.59 0.137 0.71 0.052 0.1 361.95 2 1 219 2 1 1767485
10 438.15 1828.8 1063.8 1.72 0.137 0.71 0.053 0.1 361.95 2 2 203 2 1 1746920
1 660.4 2438.4 981.1 2.49 0.182 0.94 0.048 0.09 596.9 2 1 505 1 1 1522788
Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating Shell & Tube V11 Page 23
File: C:\Users\ladwa\Desktop\HeatExch.EDR Printed: 24-11-2023 at 18:20:34
Company:
Location:
Service of Unit: Our Reference:
Item No.: Your Reference:
Date: Rev No.: Job No.:
Operational Issues
Unsupported Design
Vibration Rho-V-Sq
tube length Status
Possible No No (OK )
Possible No No (OK )
Recap of Design
Number of baffles 2 2 2 2 2
Tube passes 1 1 1 1 1
Program mode Design (Sizing) Design (Sizing) Design (Sizing) Design (Sizing) Design (Sizing)
Shell ID mm 660.4
Number of baffles 2
Tube passes 1
Advanced
Calculation method
method
TEMA Sheet
Heat Exchanger Specification Sheet
1 Company:
2 Location:
3 Service of Unit: Our Reference:
4 Item No.: Your Reference:
5 Date: Rev No.: Job No.:
6 Size : 660 - 2438.4 mm Type: BEM Horizontal Connected in: 1 parallel 1 series
7 Surf/unit(eff.) 71 m² Shells/unit 1 Surf/shell(eff.) 71 m²
8 PERFORMANCE OF ONE UNIT
9 Fluid allocation Shell Side Tube Side
10 Fluid name Air Water
11 Fluid quantity, Total kg/h 20000 19035
12 Vapor (In/Out) kg/h 20000 20000 0 0
13 Liquid kg/h 0 0 19035 19035
14 Noncondensable kg/h 0 0 0 0
15
16 Temperature (In/Out) °C 100 60 30 40
17 Bubble / Dew point °C / / / /
18 Density Vapor/Liquid kg/m³ 1.69 / 1.71 / / 995.57 / 992.1
19 Viscosity cp 0.0219 / 0.0201 / / 0.7972 / 0.6514
20 Molecular wt, Vap 28.95 28.95
21 Molecular wt, NC
22 Specific heat kcal/(kg-C) 0.2408 / 0.2402 / / 1.0006 / 1.0009
23 Thermal conductivity kcal/(h-m-C) 0.027 / 0.024 / / 0.532 / 0.544
24 Latent heat kcal/kg
25 Pressure (abs) kgf/cm² 1.85 1.668 3 2.952
26 Velocity (Mean/Max) m/s 29.81 / 31.61 0.06 / 0.06
27 Pressure drop, allow./calc. kgf/cm² 0.193 0.182 0.51 0.048
28 Fouling resistance (min) m²-h-C/kcal 0 0 0 Ao based
29 Heat exchanged 192226 kcal/h MTD (corrected) 43.29 °C
30 Transfer rate, Service 62.5 Dirty 155.4 Clean 155.4 kcal/(h-m²-C)
31 CONSTRUCTION OF ONE SHELL Sketch
32 Shell Side Tube Side
33 Design/Vacuum/test pressure kgf/cm² 3.515 / / 3.515 / /
34 Design temperature / MDMT °C 137.78 / 76.67 / S1 T2
Overall Summary
Overall Performance
Resistance Distribution
Shell 1
Total Comp 1
Total Comp 1
Duty Distribution
Pressure Drop
Flow Analysis
Thermosiphons
Thermosiphon stability
Kettles
Recirculation ratio
Quality at top of bundle
Entrainment fraction
Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating Shell & Tube V11 Page 35
File: C:\Users\ladwa\Desktop\HeatExch.EDR Printed: 24-11-2023 at 18:20:34
Company:
Location:
Service of Unit: Our Reference:
Item No.: Your Reference:
Date: Rev No.: Job No.:
Vibration tube location Inlet row, centre Outer window, bottom Baffle overlap Bottom Row
Natural frequency method Exact Solution Exact Solution Exact Solution Exact Solution
Dominant span
Dominant span
Note: W/Wc = ratio of actual shellside flowrate to critical flowrate for onset of fluid-elastic instability
Vibration tube location Inlet row, centre Inlet row, centre Inlet row, centre Outer window, bottom
Vibration tube location Outer window, bottom Outer window, bottom Baffle overlap Baffle overlap
Vibration tube location Baffle overlap Bottom Row Bottom Row Bottom Row Inlet row, end
Vibration tube location Inlet row, end Inlet row, end Outer window, top Outer window, top
Methods Summary
Single phase tube side heat transfer method HTFS recommended method
Lowfin Calculation method HTFS / ESDU
Basic Geometry
Unit Configuration
Exchanger type BEM Tube number 505
Position Hor Tube length actual mm 2438.4
Arrangement 1 parallel 1 series Tube passes 1
Baffle type Single segmental Tube type Plain
Baffle number 2 Tube O.D. mm 19.05
Spacing (center-center) mm 596.9 Tube pitch mm 23.81
Spacing at inlet mm 876.3 Tube pattern 30
Tubes
Tubes
Baffles
Baffles
Type Single segmental Baffle cut: inner/outer/interm
Tubes in window Yes Actual (% diameter) / 40.63 /
Number 2 Nominal (% diameter) / 40 /
Spacing (center-center) mm 596.9 Actual (% area) / 38.15 /
Spacing at inlet mm 876.3 Cut orientation H
Spacing at outlet mm 876.3 Thickness mm 9.52
Spacing at center in/out for G,H,I,J mm Tube rows in baffle overlap 6
Spacing at center for H shell mm Tube rows in baffle window 7.5
End length of the front head mm 920.75 Baffle hole - tube od diam clearance mm 0.4
End length of the rear head mm 920.75 Shell id - tube od diam clearance mm 4.76
Supports-Misc. Baffles
Bundle
Bundle
Shell ID to center 1st tube row mm Tube passes 1
From top 114.45 Tube pass layout Ribbon (single band)
From bottom 114.45 Tube pass orientation Standard (horizontal)
From right 11.11 U-bend orientation Undefined
From left 11.11 Horizontal pass lane width mm
Impingement protection None Vertical pass lane width mm
Impingement plate clearance to tube edge mm Interpass tube alignment No
Impingement plate diameter mm Deviation in tubes/pass 0
Impingement plate width mm Outer tube limit mm 647.7
Impingement plate length mm Shell id - bundle otl diam clearance mm 12.7
Impingement plate thickness mm Tie rod number 6
Gross surface area per shell m² 73.7 Tie rod diameter mm 9.55
Effective surface area per shell m² 71 Sealing strips (pairs) 2
Bare tube area per shell m² 71 Tube to Tubesheet joint Exp. 2 grv
Finned area per shell m² 0 Tube projection from front tsht mm 3.18
U-bend area per shell m² 0 Tube projection from rear tsht mm 3.18
Enhancements
Setting Plan
Views on arrow A
A 3553 Overall
2350
325 232 324 1816 459
S1 T2
594
T1
S1
594
594
632
S2
T1 S2
232 635 1219
T2 1910 51 51
Pulling Length
594
147
147
589
589
102 102
2 Bolts 2 Bolts
Fixed Sliding
Nozzle Data Design Data Units Shell Channel Notes: Company:
Ref OD Wall Standard Notes Design Pressure bar 3.45 3.45 Location:
S1 356 mm 9.5 mm Slip on Design Temperature °C 137.78 76.67 Service of Unit: Our Reference:
S2 406 mm 9.5 mm Slip on Full Vacuum Item No.: Your Reference:
T1 60 mm 3.9 mm Slip on Corrosion Allowance mm 3.175 3.175 Date: Rev No.: Job No.:
T2 60 mm 3.9 mm Slip on Test Pressure bar
Number of Passes 1 1
Radiography
Company Name
PWHT City, State
Internal Volume m³ 0.5271 0.5513 Scale:
Rev: Date: Description Dwg. Chk. Appd. ASME Section VIII Div. 1
Weight Summary TEMA Type: BEM
Setting Plan
Empty Flooded Bundle Size: 660 - 2438 Dwg No.: Rev:
2103 kg 2858 kg 1328 kg TEMA Class: R HeatExch 1
Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating Shell & Tube V11 Page 48
File: C:\Users\ladwa\Desktop\HeatExch.EDR Printed: 24-11-2023 at 18:20:34
Company:
Location:
Service of Unit: Our Reference:
Item No.: Your Reference:
Date: Rev No.: Job No.:
Tubesheet Layout
19.05
505
23.8125
206.22 mm
Outer tube limit mm 647.7
Tube number (calcs.) 505
Tube number (layout) 505
Tube length mm 2438.4
Tube O.D. mm 19.05
Tube pitch mm 23.8125
Tube pattern 30
Tube passes 1
Tie rod number 6
206.22 mm
Notes: Company:
Location:
Service of Unit: Our Reference:
Item No.: Your Reference:
Date: Rev No.: Job No.:
Company Name
City, State
Scale:
Rev: Date: Description Dwg. Chk. Appd. ASME Code Sec VIII Div 1
TEMA Type: BEM
Tube Layout
Size: 660 - 2438 Dwg No.: Rev:
TEMA Class: R - refinery service HeatExch 2
Costs/Weights
Temperature C 100 96.37 92.73 89.1 85.46 81.83 78.19 74.55 70.91 67.28 63.64
Enthalpy kcal/kg 17.9 17.02 16.15 15.28 14.4 13.53 12.65 11.78 10.91 10.03 9.16
Pressure kgf/cm2 1.85 1.833 1.817 1.8 1.784 1.767 1.751 1.734 1.717 1.701 1.684
Liquid viscosity cp
Vapor density kg/m3 1.69 1.69 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.71 1.71 1.71
Vapor specific heat kcal/(kg*C) 0.2408 0.2407 0.2406 0.2406 0.2405 0.2404 0.2404 0.2403 0.2403 0.2402 0.2402
Vapor thermal cond. kcal/(h*m*C) 0.027 0.027 0.026 0.026 0.026 0.026 0.026 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025
Vapor viscosity cp 0.0219 0.0217 0.0215 0.0214 0.0212 0.0211 0.0209 0.0208 0.0206 0.0204 0.0203
Temperature C 60
Liquid viscosity cp
mm C C C C C kgf/cm2 kcal/kg
Enthalpy kcal/kg -3772.24 -3771.32 -3770.4 -3769.48 -3768.56 -3767.65 -3766.73 -3765.81 -3764.89
Pressure kgf/cm2 3 2.996 2.991 2.987 2.982 2.978 2.974 2.969 2.965
Liquid density kg/m3 995.57 995.28 995 994.7 994.4 994.09 993.78 993.45 993.12
Liquid specific heat kcal/(kg*C) 1.0006 1.0006 1.0007 1.0007 1.0007 1.0007 1.0008 1.0008 1.0008
Liquid thermal cond. kcal/(h*m*C) 0.532 0.533 0.535 0.536 0.537 0.538 0.539 0.54 0.541
Liquid viscosity cp 0.7972 0.782 0.7671 0.7528 0.7388 0.7252 0.712 0.6992 0.6868
Surface tension dynes/cm 71.2 71.1 70.9 70.8 70.6 70.4 70.3 70.1 70
Vapor viscosity cp
Vapor viscosity cp