Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 46 views

    Valid Arguments For Tariffs or Export Subsidi

    Uploaded by

    Trang Chử Thu
    The document discusses potential arguments for and against tariffs or export subsidies. Arguments that could be valid include: a) low earnings of dairy producers in Wales despite overall rise in farm incomes, which tariffs or subsidies could help with; b) higher costs from ecological certification requirements in the EU, which export subsidies could offset; and c) benefits of U.S. soybean exports beyond just farmers. Arguments that are not valid include: d) resilience of the PET recycling market, which does not relate to tariffs or subsidies; and e) challenges in the coal industry like job losses, which also does not relate to tariffs or subsidies.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Valid Arguments For Tariffs or Export Subsidi

    Uploaded by

    Trang Chử Thu
    46 views1 page
    The document discusses potential arguments for and against tariffs or export subsidies. Arguments that could be valid include: a) low earnings of dairy producers in Wales despite overall rise in farm incomes, which tariffs or subsidies could help with; b) higher costs from ecological certification requirements in the EU, which export subsidies could offset; and c) benefits of U.S. soybean exports beyond just farmers. Arguments that are not valid include: d) resilience of the PET recycling market, which does not relate to tariffs or subsidies; and e) challenges in the coal industry like job losses, which also does not relate to tariffs or subsidies.

    Original Title

    Valid Arguments for Tariffs or Export Subsidi

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses potential arguments for and against tariffs or export subsidies. Arguments that could be valid include: a) low earnings of dairy producers in Wales despite overall rise in farm incomes, which tariffs or subsidies could help with; b) higher costs from ecological certification requirements in the EU, which export subsidies could offset; and c) benefits of U.S. soybean exports beyond just farmers. Arguments that are not valid include: d) resilience of the PET recycling market, which does not relate to tariffs or subsidies; and e) challenges in the coal industry like job losses, which also does not relate to tariffs or subsidies.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    46 views1 page

    Valid Arguments For Tariffs or Export Subsidi

    Uploaded by

    Trang Chử Thu
    The document discusses potential arguments for and against tariffs or export subsidies. Arguments that could be valid include: a) low earnings of dairy producers in Wales despite overall rise in farm incomes, which tariffs or subsidies could help with; b) higher costs from ecological certification requirements in the EU, which export subsidies could offset; and c) benefits of U.S. soybean exports beyond just farmers. Arguments that are not valid include: d) resilience of the PET recycling market, which does not relate to tariffs or subsidies; and e) challenges in the coal industry like job losses, which also does not relate to tariffs or subsidies.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    #### Valid Arguments for Tariffs or Export Subsidies:

    a. **“Earnings of Dairy producers in Wales are at their lowest peak despite an overall rise in farm
    business incomes.”** This argument suggests that despite the overall rise in farm business incomes,
    dairy producers in Wales are experiencing low earnings. This could be a valid argument for
    implementing tariffs or export subsidies to protect the domestic dairy industry in Wales. However,
    further information is needed to determine the specific reasons for the low earnings and whether
    tariffs or export subsidies would be an appropriate solution.
    b. **“The more ecologically certified food products the EU requires, the higher the price of these
    products will be on the common market.”** This argument suggests that the requirement for
    ecological certification of food products in the EU will lead to higher prices. While this argument does
    not directly relate to tariffs or export subsidies, it highlights a potential negative consequence of
    regulations on the price of products. It could be used as a supporting argument for implementing
    export subsidies to offset the increased costs of compliance with ecological certification
    requirements.
    c. **“U.S. soybean exports to China and India don’t just mean increased wealth for farmers–they
    mean increased wealth for everyone in the value chain.”** This argument suggests that U.S. soybean
    exports to China and India benefit not only farmers but also everyone involved in the value chain. This
    could be a valid argument for promoting exports and potentially implementing export subsidies to
    support the soybean industry. However, it is important to consider the overall economic impact and
    potential trade-offs associated with export subsidies.
    #### Not a Valid Argument for Tariffs or Export Subsidies:

    d. **“The PET industry continued to sustain US recycling programs; this shows the strength of the PET
    recycling market in the face of significant global economic slowdown and a drop in virgin feedstock
    prices.”** This argument highlights the strength of the PET recycling market in the face of economic
    challenges. However, it does not directly relate to tariffs or export subsidies. It is more focused on the
    resilience of the PET recycling industry. Therefore, it is not a valid argument for tariffs or export
    subsidies.
    e. **“The price of coal has been stable, but the production dropped 10.3 percent, and workers have
    been forced to look for other jobs.”** This argument highlights the decline in coal production and the
    impact on workers. However, it does not directly relate to tariffs or export subsidies. It is more
    focused on the challenges faced by the coal industry and the need for alternative job opportunities
    for workers. Therefore, it is not a valid argument for tariffs or export subsidies.

    You might also like