001 Khan
001 Khan
001 Khan
Correponding Auther:
Summary
In present study, Hepatoprotective activity of the 70% ethanolic extract of unripe fruit of
Ficus glomerata was studied on paracetamol and CCL4 treated albino rats. The
hepatoprotective effect was evaluated on the basis of estimation of biochemical parameter
like SGPT, SGOT, ALP, ACP, TB, DB. The 70% ethanolic extract of fruits of Ficus
glomerata at the dose of (100mg/kg, 250mg/kg, 500mg/kg) produces a dose dependant
significant reduction in biochemical parameter as well as in morphological parameter.
Treatment with unripe fruit of Ficus glomerata extract had shown significant
hepatoprotective effect also supported by histopathological studies on liver, the result was in
comparison with the standard drug silymarin. Silymarin was used as the reference standard
at 25mg/kg p.o. and it showed effect in both he hepatotoxicity models. The aorgan
protective activity which may be attributed to polyphenolic compounds like flavanoids
and tannins that are present in the unripe fruits of Ficus glomerata.
1
Pharmacologyonline 2: 1-13 (2011) Irfan et al.
Introduction
Liver, the most versatile but complex internal organ of human body, plays vital role in
metabolic activities. Its importance also lies in its impetus in management of internal
enviourment and biochemical conversion of endogenous and exogenous chemical to
harmless and excretable compounds. Therefore being a vital organ, its protection has a
1
special status in therapeutics. Prolonged drug therapy, excessive use of the some of the
commonly used medicines like paracetamol, diclofenac etc., alcoholism, exposure to
certain xenobiotic, polutants and certain disease state have been reported to affect liver
functioning. The major clinical manifestation of liver disorder is jaundice. Despite of the
excellent regeneratation capacity of this organ, a slight injury or toxicity may lead to fatal
complications. Therefore damage to the liver inflicted by hepatotoxic agents is of grave
consequences. Unavailability of rational therapy in modern medicine and no or very less
positive influence of synthetic drugs in liver damage have urged researchers in this field
to look for herbal drugs with better hepatoprotective action. Traditional medicines are
effective in certain disease and are based on their age-old use in folklore system of
medicine. Natural products of plant origin with hepatoprotective and antioxidants
2
properties play an important role in treatment of liver toxicity.
One of such plant is Ficus glomerata (Roxb) has been used in traditional system of
medicine for treating diabetes diarrhoea, liver diseases, piles, asthma, leprosy and
diarrhea.3 The hepatoprotective activity of leaves of Ficus glomerata has been reported.4
Leaves shows anti-bacterial activity5, stem bark shows anti-tussive potential6, anti-
diuretic activity7, anti-pyretic potential8, anti-inflammatory activity of the leaves, bark and
unripe fruit9-11, hepatoprotective activity of the leaves4, hypoglycemic activity of roots,
leaves and fruit12-14 and anti-filarial activity of the fruits.15
However, there is no scientific claims has been made regarding the hepatoprotective
activity of unripe fruits of Ficus glomerata. In view of this, in the present investigation an
attempt will be made to study hepatoprotective role of unripe fruit extract of Ficus
glomerata.
The unripe fruits of Ficus glomerata were collected from the surrounding fields of
Harapanahalli. The identification of plant was made by Professor K. Prabhu, Department
of Pharmacognosy, S.C.S. College of Pharmacy, Harapanahalli. A voucher specimen has
been deposited at the museum of our college. The unripe fruits were collected in the
month of April. The unripe fruits were dried in shade at room temperature. The dried
unripe fruits were powdered by using grinder, to coarse powder and this powder was
packed into soxhlet column and the extracted 70% ethanol (60 – 800) for 24 hrs. The
extract was concentrated under reduced pressure with the use of rotatory flash evaporator.
Further the extracts were concentrated by using hot water bath (70 – 800). The dried
extract was stored in airtight container in refrigerator below 100C.
2
Pharmacologyonline 2: 1-13 (2011) Irfan et al.
Animals:
The male albino rats wistar stain 150 – 200 g and albino mice 20 – 30 g were used
through the experimentation. The animals were procured from Venkateshwara
Associates, Bangalore, Karnataka. After randomization into various groups, animals were
acclimatized for period of 10 days under standard husbandry condition as follows; Room
temperature 27 ± 30C, Relative humidity 65 ± 10%, 12 hrs light/dark cycle. All the
animals were fed with rodent pellet diet (Gold mohr, Lipton India Ltd.,) and water was
allowed ad-libitum under strict hygienic condition. Ethical clearance for performing
experiments on animals was obtained from Institutional Animal Ethics Committee
(IAEC).18
30 min. followed by centrifugation (3000 rpm for 15 min.) and subjected for
determination of biochemical parameters.
Liver were dissected out and subjected for morphological study such as wet liver weight
and wet liver volume of each animal was determined. The volume of wet liver was
measured by displacement method and further the liver were placed in 10% formalin
solution for histopathological study.20
4
Pharmacologyonline 2: 1-13 (2011) Irfan et al.
The liver pieces were washed with running water to remove formalin completely. To
remove the water, alcohol of increasing strengths was used since it is a dehydrating agent.
Further alcohol was removed by using chloroform and chloroform removed by paraffin
infiltration.
Statistical analysis:
The results were expressed as mean ± standard error mean (SEM). The statistical
significance was assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by
Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test and p < 0.01 was considers significant.
Results
5
Pharmacologyonline 2: 1-13 (2011) Irfan et al.
6
Pharmacologyonline 2: 1-13 (2011) Irfan et al.
TABLE NO. 1
Effect of EEFFG on biochemical and morphological parameter in CCl4 induced hepatotoxicity.
SGPT SGOT ALP ACP TB DB Volume/ Weight/
Groups
IU/l IU/l IU/l IU/l mg/dl mg/dl 100gb.w. 100g b.w
7
Pharmacologyonline 2: 1-13 (2011) Irfan et al.
TABLE NO.2
Effect of EEFFG on biochemical and morphological parameter in Paracetamol induced hepatotoxicity.
SGPT SGOT ALP ACP TB DB Volume/ Weight/
Groups IU/l IU/l IU/l IU/l mg/dl mg/dl 100g b.w. 100g b.w
8
Pharmacologyonline 2: 1-13 (2011) Irfan et al.
FIG 1
Effect of EEFFG on Histopathological Studies in CCl4 induced hepatotoxicity
9
Pharmacologyonline 2: 1-13 (2011) Irfan et al.
FIG-2
Effect of EEFFG on Histopathological Studies in Paracetamol induced hepatotoxicity
Fig A Control Para Fig B Hept Control Para Fig C Para 100
10
Pharmacologyonline 2: 1-13 (2011) Irfan et al.
Discussion
11
Pharmacologyonline 2: 1-13 (2011) Irfan et al.
flavanoids and tannins this could be the reason for significant hepatoprotective property
of the test extract.
References
1. Ravishankar SB, Bhavsar GC. Plants with hepatoprotective activity. Indian Drugs 1993;
30: 363-365.
2. Vaidya AB, Sirsat SM, Doshi JC, Antarkar DS. Selected medicinal plants and
formulation as hepatobiliary drug: An overview. Indian J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther 1996;
17: 7-11.
3. Warrier PK, Nambiar VPK, Ramankutty C. Indian Medicinal Plants, Madras.
Oriental Longman Ltd., 1996; (3): 34p.
4. Mandal SC, Maity TK, Das J, Pal M, Saha BP. Hepatoprotective activity of Ficus
racemosa leaf extract on liver damage caused by carbon tetrachloride in rat.
Phytotherapy Research 1999; 13(5): 430-32.
5. Mandal SC, Shah BP, Pal M. Studies on antibacterial activity of Ficus glomerata
Linn. leaf extract. Phytotherapy Research 2000; 14(4): 278-80.
6. Bhaskara Rao R, Murugesan T, Pal M, Saha BP, Mandal SC. Antitussive potential of
methanol extract of stem bark of Ficus glomerata Linn. Phytotherapy Research 2003;
17(9): 1117-18.
7. Ratnasooriya WD, Jayakody JR, Nadarajah T. Antidiuretic activity of aqueous bark
extract of Sri Lankan Ficus racemosa in rats. Acta Biology Hung 2003; 54(3-4): 357-
63.
8. Rao RB, Anupama K, Swaroop KR, Murugesan T, Pal M, Mandal SC. Evaluation of
anti-pyretic potential of Ficus glomerata bark. Phytomedicine 2002; 9(8): 731-33.
9. Mandal SC, Maity TK, Das J, Saha BP, Pal M. Antiinflammatory evaluation of Ficus
racemosa Linn. leaf extract. J Ethnopharmacol 2000; 72(1-2): 87-92.
10. Rachel W Li, Stephen P Myers, David N Leach, David Lin G, Greg Leach. Across-
cultural study : Anti-inflammatory activity of Australian and Chinese plants. J
Ethnopharmacol 2003; 85(1): 25-32.
11. Shivakumar H, Sankara SLVJ, Vaidya VP. Anti-inflammatory activity of the unripe
fruits of Ficus glomerata. Indian Drugs 2007; 44(1): 48-50
12. Ajit Kar, Choudhary BK, Bandyopathdhy NG. Comparative evaluation of
hypoglycaemic activity of some Indian medicinal plants in alloxan diabetic rats. J
Ethnopharmacol 2003; 84(1): 105-08.
13. Mandal SC, Mukharjee PK, Das J, Pal M, Saha BP. Hypoglycemic activity of Ficus
racemosa Linn leaves in streptozotocin induced diabetic rat. Nat Prod Sci 1997; 3(1):
38-41.
14. Patil KS, Varke PD, Chaturvedi SC. Hypoglycemic properties of Ficus glomerata
fruits in alloxan induced diabetic rat. J Nat Rem 2006; 6(2): 120-23.
15. Vandan Mishra, Nizam U Khan, Singhal KC. Potential antifilarial activity of fruit
extracts of Ficus racemosa Linn. against Setaria cervi in vitro. Indian J Exp Biol
2005; 43: 346-50.
16. Kokate CK. Practical Pharmacognosy 4th ed. New Delhi: Vallabha
prakashan.,1999.169p.
17. Khandelwal KR. Practical Pharmacognosy. 11th ed. Pune: Nirali Prakashan 2004:
149p.
12
Pharmacologyonline 2: 1-13 (2011) Irfan et al.
18. Mrs. Prema Veeraraghavan. Expert consultant, CPCSEA, OECD guide line No.
420; Oct 2000.
19. Malaya gupta, Upal Kanti Mazumder, Thangavel Siva Kumar, Periyasamy, Gomathi,
Ramanathan Sambath Kumar. Antioxidant and hepatoprotective effects of Bauhinia
racemosa against paracetamol and carbon tetrachloride induced liver damage in rats.
Iranian Journal of Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2004; 3: 12-20.
20. Luna LG. Manual of histology and staining methods of Armed Forces institute of
Pathology, 3rd ed. New York, McGraw Hill Book Co., 1986; 1p.
21. Bradley DW., et al. Clin Chem. 1972; 18: 1442 p.
22. Rej R, Fasce CF, Vanderlinde RE. Clin Chem. 1973; 19: 92p.
23. MacComb RB, Bower GN. Clin Chem 1972; 18: 97p.
24. Alex Kaplan, Szabo LL. Clin Chem. 1983; 216p.
25. Pearlman PC, Lee RT. Clin Chem. 1974; 20: 447p.
26. Slater TF. Biochemical mechanism of liver injury.1965; London : Academic press:
1p.
27. Plaa GI, Hewitt WR. Toxicology of the liver. Raven Press Zakim D, Boyer T.D;
1982: 103p.
28. Chenoweth MB, Hake CL. Ann Rev Pharmacol. 1962; 2: 363p.
29. Brattin WJ, Glende EA Jr, Recknagel RO. Pathological mechanisms in carbon
tetrachloride hepatotoxicity. J Free Radic Biol Med. 1985; 1: 27-32.
30. Sallie R, Tredger JM, William R. Biopharm Drug Disp 1974; 12: 251p.
31. Packer JE, Slater TF, Wilson RL. Life Sci. 1978; 23:2617p.
32. Van De Straat R, De Vries J, Depets AJJ, Vermueulein NPE. Biochem Pharmacol
1987; 36: 2065.
33. Castro JA, de Ferreyra GC, de Castro CR, Sesame H, de Fenso MO, Gillette JR
Biochem Pharmacol 1974; 23: 295.
34. Nelson EB, Montes M, Goldstein M. Toxicology 1980; 17: 73p.
13