Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    1871

    Uploaded by

    Curry, William Lawrence III, agent
    The document discusses the Act of 1871 and its context and impact. It notes that the Act was passed in 1871 but repealed in 1874 and then revived in 1877. It argues that the Act had little to do with Americans and was mainly a restructuring of a foreign federal subcontractor. It then discusses that in 1868, prior to the Act, a Scottish corporation called "The United States of America, Incorporated" imposed its corporate articles as the Constitution. In 1871, a similar process created the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation. The key concern, according to the document, is how the US government was usurped starting in 1868 through acts of fraud and without public disclosure.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    1871

    Uploaded by

    Curry, William Lawrence III, agent
    7 views2 pages
    The document discusses the Act of 1871 and its context and impact. It notes that the Act was passed in 1871 but repealed in 1874 and then revived in 1877. It argues that the Act had little to do with Americans and was mainly a restructuring of a foreign federal subcontractor. It then discusses that in 1868, prior to the Act, a Scottish corporation called "The United States of America, Incorporated" imposed its corporate articles as the Constitution. In 1871, a similar process created the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation. The key concern, according to the document, is how the US government was usurped starting in 1868 through acts of fraud and without public disclosure.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses the Act of 1871 and its context and impact. It notes that the Act was passed in 1871 but repealed in 1874 and then revived in 1877. It argues that the Act had little to do with Americans and was mainly a restructuring of a foreign federal subcontractor. It then discusses that in 1868, prior to the Act, a Scottish corporation called "The United States of America, Incorporated" imposed its corporate articles as the Constitution. In 1871, a similar process created the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation. The key concern, according to the document, is how the US government was usurped starting in 1868 through acts of fraud and without public disclosure.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    7 views2 pages

    1871

    Uploaded by

    Curry, William Lawrence III, agent
    The document discusses the Act of 1871 and its context and impact. It notes that the Act was passed in 1871 but repealed in 1874 and then revived in 1877. It argues that the Act had little to do with Americans and was mainly a restructuring of a foreign federal subcontractor. It then discusses that in 1868, prior to the Act, a Scottish corporation called "The United States of America, Incorporated" imposed its corporate articles as the Constitution. In 1871, a similar process created the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation. The key concern, according to the document, is how the US government was usurped starting in 1868 through acts of fraud and without public disclosure.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    By Anna Von Reitz

    The Act of 1871 was indeed passed in 1871. Repealed in 1874. Then by piecemeal finally
    revived and passed in 1877, implemented in 1878. And it had precious little to do with us, as it
    was actually a restructuring of one of the foreign Federal Subcontractors to better avoid
    culpability for and to profit from crimes that the same Guilty Parties had already committed
    against us.

    After the Civil War the victorious Union Army that fought for the Northern Confederation
    reorganized what was left of the Federal Territorial Government to settle the bankruptcy Lincoln
    started in 1863, which he declared the day after he issued the first ever Executive Order—-
    General Order 100.

    Among other things prior to the Act of 1871, a Scottish Commercial Corporation merely calling
    itself “The United States of America, Incorporated” foisted off it’s corporate Articles of
    Incorporation as “the” Constitution in 1868.

    So they formed a substitute entity, a foreign commercial corporation, named it after us, and
    started doing business “in our names”—- impersonating us and illegally accessing our assets and
    credit— starting in 1868.

    And in 1871, they began this same process of impersonation “for” the District of Columbia— by
    creating the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation.

    Call me old-fashioned, but the Switcheroo that took place in 1868 is what should be of most
    concern to us as Americans, and only secondarily should the corollary fraud taking place in the
    District of Columbia concern us.

    In both cases, the actual government was usurped and our assets seized upon illegally and
    unlawfully via members of “the US” Congress pretending to “represent” us and all operated
    under conditions of non-disclosure, fraud, breach of trust, and deceit.

    To put it bluntly— instead of functioning as our Fiduciary Deputies in the office we defined for
    them, these Post-Civil War reprobates evaded that responsibility and began operating as
    “Trustees” of our State assets, and as our purported proxies voting “for” us in their own
    corporate shareholder elections.

    And they never told us a word about all these arrangements being made “for” us and in our
    names.

    The actual American Government was thus by-passed and settled into dormancy while our
    Employees contrived to become our Masters—-literally.

    Yes, the Act of 1871 is a window on the process of this criminality overtaking a foreign
    subcontractor of ours, but that’s hardly our concern. A subcontractor of ours could choose to
    reorganize its own internal affairs and decide to incorporate its business and it’s no skin off our
    noses, is it?
    What is really important about the Act of 1871 is that it shows what went on in Scotland and
    America in 1868.

    And all without our knowledge or permission.

    You might also like