B7510 Syllabus Spring 24 FS - v2
B7510 Syllabus Spring 24 FS - v2
B7510 Syllabus Spring 24 FS - v2
This course seeks to develop these skills and provide students with frameworks for analyzing negotiations
at a more sophisticated level. We give you the opportunity to identify your strengths as a negotiator and to
work on your weaknesses. The course will provide a conceptual framework to diagnose problems, promote
agreement, and cut your losses where warranted. More importantly, this course is an opportunity for you to
experiment with different techniques and to explore what does and what does not work for you at the
bargaining table.
Course Format
Negotiation and conflict ultimately come down to behaviors—how a manager opens a potentially volatile
conversation, how a mediator uncovers information, how a negotiator frames an offer or a concession.
Practicing these behaviors, and understanding how other parties perceive and react to them, is essential to
improving as a negotiator. This course provides continuing opportunities for hands-on practice and also
provides feedback, discussion, and occasions for reflection.
Through role-play exercises, lecture, reading, and discussion, the course begins with basic dynamics in
negotiation and adds complexity in stages, including multiple issues, multiple parties, agents, teams and
coalitions. Some exercises involve numerical analyses; others revolve around qualitative conflicts. By the
course’s end, students should be able to confidently approach most any conflict or negotiation: analyzing its
nature, understanding their own objectives, and plotting an approach that will give them the best shot at
achieving their goals.
Academic Integrity
All academic activities and work that students conduct during their time at the School should reflect a
commitment to intellectual integrity. Violating this principle is one of the most serious offenses a student
can commit. Except where noted, you are expected to submit independent work—giving unauthorized
assistance to another person on assignments, without the instructor’s permission, is prohibited. Using
unauthorized materials, study aids, or the work of another in order gain an unfair advantage is also
EMBA Friday-Saturday | Spring 2024 1
prohibited. So too is taking, circulating, or sharing of past material(s) without the instructor’s permission.
You are not permitted to use words, phrases or ideas that belong to another individual without properly
citing the source. You can use ChatGPT to edit text that you write (i.e., as a copy editor) but you cannot use
it to be the generator of the assignment you submit, except where noted (the one assignment for which you
are asked to do this). Using any material portion of an assignment to fulfill the requirements of more than
one course without the instructor’s permission is also prohibited. If you have any questions about what is
expected of you, please speak to Professor Mason.
Readings
All readings are optional and are intended to be an additional resource for students to use to further
develop their base of knowledge and skill set. Students who complete the optional readings tend to get
more out of the course because the readings reinforce and expand on what we learn in class. I make them
optional because we do not spend class time discussing them.
Grading
Participation includes both active, substantive involvement in role-play simulations and discussion and
comments in class (quality is more important than quantity).
• Agenda. Is there an order in which you prefer to discuss certain matters? Are there issues that you will
wait for them to raise?
• Questions. What can you ask in order to figure out how far they can be pushed? What can you ask to figure
out what they care most about?
• Target. What’s the value of the deal you’d like to reach?
• Resistance Point or Reservation Price. What’s the worst deal that you would accept rather than an impasse-
-walking away from the negotiation without a settlement?
• Arguments. What are some rationales or framings you will use? How will you persuade the other party?
• Tactics. What ploys or techniques would be appropriate in this situation?
Peer Video Feedback. This exercise will give you a chance to reflect on how you and others negotiate, to
help a classmate develop his/her negotiation skills, and to develop your own. You will review the video of a
classmate to whom you have been assigned for this specific exercise and provide some feedback and
comments. After receiving the feedback, I encourage you to reflect on your performance in light of the
feedback from your peer. The deliverable is a set of at least four comments, emailed to your assigned peer
and uploaded to Canvas. The assignment is due by Sunday, January 21st at 11:59 ET. (Approximate
completion time: 25 minutes).
Action Plan Document. Based on the feedback you have received and your experience with yourself, you
should develop an action plan for self-development. Pick one behavior that you would like to change and
describe how you are going to achieve this change using the template provided. There are two sections.
Please upload your plan to Canvas no later than Sunday, February 4th at 11:59 ET (Approximate total
completion time: 20 minutes).
“Score a Deal” Exercise. This assignment is designed to probe and solidify your understanding of the
multi-attribute value analysis (MAV) approach for clarifying tradeoffs between qualitatively different issues
in multi-issue negotiation settings. Please answer the four questions, using the Ames et al. “Scoring a Deal”
handout as a guide. This assignment is due by Sunday, February 17th at 11:59 ET. Upload your responses
to Canvas. (Approximate completion time: 45-60 minutes).
1. You must negotiate at least some portion of it in person or via zoom (i.e., face to face). You may not
conduct the entire negotiation over the phone or email.
2. You may not tell the person you are negotiating with that this is for a class project until the
negotiation is complete (after which you can decide whether or not you want to tell them this).
3. You must follow through with the transaction if you state you agree to the proposed deal terms (i.e.,
you must negotiate “in good faith”).
You will be graded on: 1) the thoroughness of your negotiation preparation, 2) the quality of your
negotiation strategy (appropriateness and intention), 3) the rigor of you analysis and 4) the thoughtfulness
of your post-negotiation analysis.
• Phone Negotiation Worksheet. To practice applying basic negotiation skills and to give you an
opportunity to reflect on the role of agents in negotiations, you are asked to call a customer service
representative (an agent employed by your phone carrier, cable/Internet service provider, credit
card company, etc.) and attempt to negotiate a better deal. There are two requirements: the
negotiation must happen over the phone, and you are not to reveal that you are calling as part of a
class assignment. The deliverable for this assignment is the phone negotiation worksheet. Please
note that the worksheet features pre- and post-negotiation sections. The former should obviously
be completed prior to the negotiation, and the latter after the negotiation.
• Negotiation Self-Development Plan. Drawing on your individualized feedback and your action
plan document, write a 3-page document that (1) identifies a negotiation-related behavior that you
hope to change, (2) considers the root-cause of this behavior (i.e., why do you do it?), (3) articulates
a SMART plan for adjusting that behavior. To accomplish this task, you must read “A Primer on
Personal Development” which has been posted to Canvas, which provides greater detail about what
constitutes a “SMART plan”.
EMBA Friday-Saturday | Spring 2024 4
• Strategy for Gracefully Disappointing Others. It’s one of the shortest words in the English
language – in fact there are only two shorter – and yet many of us really struggle to use it. N-o. no.
This assignment involves honing your ability to negotiate over and protect your ultimate limiting
resource: your time. I ask that you reflect on ways to improve on the skill with which you gracefully
disappoint other people, i.e., say ‘no’. In particular, you will (1) identify settings where you struggle
to tell people ‘no’, (2) reflect on why you have a difficult time asserting your personal boundaries
(see the readings provided), (3) articulate three strategies you will implement in a bid to protect
your time, and (4) specify which criteria you will use to judge your performance and when—at
what future point—you will check-in with yourself regarding your progress.
• Chat GPT – Personal Negotiation Coach. For this assignment, you are required to create a
ChatGPT account and pose five questions to the machine from a set I provide (see Canvas). For each
question, you will (1) copy the machine's answer and (2) write a one- to two-paragraph summary
that addresses the accuracy, generalizability, specificity, and general usefulness of the response.
If you’re a few minutes late with your deliverable—if you upload it within ten minutes of the deadline—we
will accept it and consider it on time. Let’s be honest, Canvas is not always reliable. If for some reason the
system is down, please just email the deliverable to the course TA (DBaltiansky26@gsb.columbia.edu)
and/or me.
Note the one exception to this late policy is the Optional Menu Assignments. I do not give extensions on this
deliverable because “H” grades are reserved for students who demonstrate they are exceptional. If you feel
that your particular situation should be considered an exception, please speak to OSA and have them
contact me directly with a request to grant you more time.
S2: Value Claiming and Peer Feedback Friday, January 19th, 3:45pm
Friday, April 5th, 12:30pm Preparation sheet for Tompkins Bowden case
Assignment: None
Optional Readings: Lewicki et al., “Strategy and Tactics of Distributive Bargaining”, Ch. 2
Malhotra, “Accept or Reject” (Canvas)
Optional Readings: Fisher et al., “Focus on Interests Not Positions”, Ch. 3 (Canvas)
Putnam, “Asking the Right Questions” (Canvas)
Optional Readings: Lewicki et al., “Strategy and Tactics of Integrative Negotiation”, Ch. 3
Lewicki et al., “Individual Differences: Personality and Abilities”, Ch. 15
Ames et al., “Personal Development Primer”
Optional Readings: Lewicki et al., “Multiple Parties, Groups & Teams”, Ch. 13
Optional Readings: Lax & Sebanius “Get the Parties Right”, Ch 4 (Canvas)