Eir Guidance
Eir Guidance
Eir Guidance
Requirements (EIR)
Guidance
BIM Toolkit | Exchange Information Requirements (EIR)
Guidance
Contents
Executive summary 1
1 Introduction 2
1.1 Exchange information requirements (EIR) purpose 2
1.2 Information management goals and objectives 3
1.2.1 Goals 3
1.2.2 Objectives 4
1.3 Information requirements hierarchy and documentation progression 4
1.3.1 Information requirements hierarchy 5
1.3.2 Exchange information requirements (EIR) response requirements 6
1.3.2.1 Pre-appointment BIM execution plan (pre-BEP) 6
1.3.2.2 Supplementary documents 7
1.3.2.3 Supplier capability and capacity assessment 7
1.3.2.4 Mobilisation plan 8
1.3.2.5 Information delivery risk assessment 8
1.3.2.6 Delivery team’s BIM execution plan (BEP) 9
2 Information requirements 10
2.1 Information purpose 10
2.2 Plan of work 11
2.3 Information delivery milestones 11
2.4 Information security requirements 12
2.5 Spatial coordination requirements 12
2.6 Project information model (PIM) 14
2.7 Asset information model (AIM) 14
2.8 Information management key performance indicators (KPIs) 15
2.9 Health and safety and design construction risk management 16
Click or tap here to enter text.Click or tap here to enter text.Click or tap here to enter text.
Tables
Table 1.1: Information delivery risk assessment 8
Table 2.1: Information delivery milestones 11
Table 2.2: Spatial coordination information requirements 13
Table 2.3: Health and safety information requirements 17
Table 2.4: Key performance indicators (KPIs) 15
Table 3.1: Information container naming convention 20
Table 3.2: Metadata 21
Table 3.3: Security metadata 22
Table 3.4: Preferred software authoring tools 24
Table 3.5: Required exchange formats 25
Table 3.6: Information software platforms 26
Table 3.7: Quality requirements 26
Table 3.8: Information management responsibility matrix 28
Table 3.9: Legacy information and shared resources 35
Figures
Figure 1: Hierarchy of information requirements, source ISO 19650–1:2018 5
Figure 3.1: Common cata environment (CDE) workflow 31
Figure 3.2: Volume strategy; source: ISO 19650:2 37
BIM Toolkit | Exchange Information Requirements (EIR) 1
Guidance
Executive summary
The international information management standards ISO 19650–1:2018 and ISO 19650–2:2018 define
the recommended concepts and principles for information management using building information
modelling (BIM), as well as specifying the activities to be undertaken to support information
management during the delivery phase of an asset.
The ISO 19650 series outlines that the appointing party shall communicate their information
requirements for the delivery phase of an asset, to the project delivery team, through the creation of
several tender documents, including the exchange information requirements (EIR) and project
information standards, the information production methods and procedures.
To assist with the adoption of the ISO 19650 series principles for construction and infrastructure
projects, both the template and this guidance document have been structured to include the information
requirements (Section 2) and the project information standards, production methods and procedures
(Section 3). For more complex/non-traditional projects with multiple delivery teams, or for a project
delivery team with wide-ranging building information modelling (BIM) experience, the project information
standards, production methods and processes should be separated into their own contractual
document.
This guidance document has been developed to assist users in the completion of the exchange
information requirements (EIR) template.
BIM Toolkit | Exchange Information Requirements (EIR) 2
Guidance
1 Introduction
Provide a high-level
explanation of the purpose
of the exchange The appointing party, {client name}, has developed these
information requirements exchange information requirements (EIR) for {project name}.
(EIR), how they will be It is structured to provide an understanding of its intended use,
used during the the information requirements and the relevant information
appointment and the standards, production methods and procedures to be adopted on
organisational objectives the project.
behind adopting the ISO
19650 series principles.
<This section is intended to help readers understand how the exchange information requirements (EIR)
should be used. This may be particularly useful for members of the prospective delivery team who may
not have experience with the ISO 19650 series principles. If any subsection content, especially Sections
1.3.2, is contained within another contractual document, it is recommended that it be omitted to prevent
confusion.>
Explain the purpose of the The exchange information requirements (EIR) provide a
exchange information specification of the information requirements that are to be met
requirements (EIR) and throughout the delivery phase of an asset. This includes the
how they should be used acceptance criteria of the information standards, information
during this appointment. production methods and procedures.
<The following example demonstrates the document’s purpose, providing a summary for the reader(s).
When completing the template, use this section to explain the function of the exchange information
requirements (EIR), keeping in mind that this may be some task teams’ first experience of building
information modelling (BIM) processes and associated documentation.>
This exchange information requirements (EIR) document and its annexes form part of the invitation to
tender suite of documents. It outlines the information requirements that the delivery team must comply
with.
All existing project information will be supplied within the invitation to tender documentation suite, via
the common data environment (CDE).
BIM Toolkit | Exchange Information Requirements (EIR) 3
Guidance
<The example below demonstrates an appointing party’s goals and objectives for implementing the ISO
19650 series principles on a project. The aim is to provide the prospective delivery team with a greater
understanding of the intention of the requirements. These may be copied directly from the project
information requirements (PIR) if applicable. If the intention is for this document to be a technical
specification, for more experienced delivery teams, this section should be omitted.>
1.2.1 Goals
Identify high-level
organisational goals,
which will help the delivery
team to understand why
implementing building
information modelling The following information management goals support {client
(BIM) on the project is name}’s continuous improvement aims for delivery of their
important. Goals are projects.
usually wide overarching
targets that define the
general intentions and
ambitions of an
organisation.
<The example below demonstrates possible goals that the appointing party might want to achieve,
which should align with the project information requirements (PIR):>
• Promote continuous collaboration and coordination across the whole delivery team.
• Have access to the right project information at the right time, to make informed decisions.
• Utilise available, accurate project information for various uses, to the benefit of the project
stakeholders.
• Use information to drive transparent sign-off of deliverables.
• Achieve measurable cost savings through implementing information management processes
and coordination.
• Embed BIM information management processes as business as usual.
• Handover usable information at completion of the construction works.
Learn lessons collectively on the use of building information modelling (BIM) and record these for future
use.
BIM Toolkit | Exchange Information Requirements (EIR) 4
Guidance
1.2.2 Objectives
<The example below demonstrates possible objectives to be adopted to achieve the overall goals.
Provide objectives that align with your specific goals:>
• Outline the requirements for producing project information in a single common data
environment (CDE) to be shared across all project work packages.
• Exchange agreed project information at established intervals during the project.
• Establish project-specific key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure progress and establish
project benchmarking.
• Collaborate using information models and data to ease review and decision-making.
• Have a fully coordinated design before commencement on-site.
• Ensure that appropriate asset metadata is embedded in the project information model (PIM)
and is suitable to meet the asset information requirements (AIR).
Provide an understanding
of how the exchange
Information requirements for the delivery phase of an asset are
information requirements
defined by wider organisational strategic and project-specific
(EIR) are defined and their
requirements. These are relayed to the delivery team through the
influence on the
exchange information requirements (EIR).
information deliverables for
handover.
<The example below demonstrates the ISO 19650 series hierarchy of information principles, as
illustrated in Figure 1 (Hierarchy of information requirements, source ISO 19650–1:2018). This section
provides the delivery team with a better understanding of how these information requirements have
been developed, including which information deliverables they directly specify and produce.
Depending on the experience of the delivery team, this section may be omitted. If this section is to be
retained within the exchange information requirements (EIR), ensure that it accurately reflects the
appointment information requirements and subsequent information deliverables.>
Figure 1 (below) illustrates how the scope of this document is influenced by the hierarchy of information
requirements, as stated in ISO 19650–1:2018, and its subsequent provision of the specification for the
project information model (PIM).
All parties will have until the {insert date} to raise any queries
regarding the exchange information requirements (EIR), including
appendices or referenced documentation.
Outline the response All parties participating in the project bid will produce a pre-
criteria for the exchange appointment BEP (pre-BEP) in response to the exchange
information requirements information requirements (EIR), which should be submitted via
(EIR), which should align {insert method for tendering} to the appointing party no later
with the recommendation than {insert date}.
of ISO 19650–2:2018.
All submissions will be reviewed. The successful party will be
informed by {insert date}. A workshop should then be held
between the appointing party and lead appointed party to review
any comments and confirm acceptance.
<If these response requirements are included within another document, this subsection should be
omitted in order to avoid confusion.
Describe the response criteria and timeframes that need to be adhered to as part of this invitation to
tender. When a delivery team first adopts the ISO 19650 series principles, it may be useful to describe
the documents and their purpose.>
The pre-appointment BIM In accordance with international ISO 19650 series, the
execution (pre-BEP) is prospective lead appointed party should produce a pre-
produced at the tender appointment BIM execution plan (pre-BEP) to demonstrate the
stage in response to the delivery team’s proposed approach and the relevant information
invitation to tender. It management competencies, to meet the exchange information
outlines how the delivery requirements (EIR).
team propose to meet the
information requirements In addition to information requested as part of the appointment
for this project. Describe process, a comprehensive pre-appointment BIM execution plan
the expected content. (pre-BEP) will include the following content.
<The example below demonstrates the expected pre-appointment BIM execution plan (pre-BEP)
content. Ensure that all the information you wish to receive as part of the tender submission in response
to the exchange information requirements (EIR) is outlined, including any supplementary
documentation or appendices.>
<Provide an explanation of any supplementary documents expected as part of the tender submission,
including any references to templates that should be used.>
<If the capability and capacity assessment questions/criteria form part of a separate supplier’s
assessment/pre-qualification questionnaire, this could be referenced here, or this section could be
omitted to avoid confusion.
The prospective delivery team or task team(s) should answer an assessment, which provides evidence
of their capability (experience, training, etc.) and capacity (resource and information technologies) to
meet the information requirements.>
BIM Toolkit | Exchange Information Requirements (EIR) 8
Guidance
<If the mobilisation criteria are included within another tender return or contractual document, this
subsection should be omitted to avoid confusion.>
<The example below, Table 1.1: Information delivery risk assessment), demonstrates that a schedule
could be included in the pre-appointment BIM execution plan or as a supplementary document, to define
any potential risks to meeting the information delivery milestones.
If the risk register is combined/included within other tender return or contractual documentation for risk
management, this subsection should be omitted in order to avoid confusion.>
The delivery team’s BIM The delivery team’s BIM execution plan (BEP) must be submitted
execution plan (BEP) by the lead appointed party via {insert method for submission}
should demonstrate the on the {insert date}.
delivery methodology. This
A comprehensive delivery team’s BIM execution plan (BEP) will
section should outline the
include the content listed below. The purpose is to demonstrate
minimum content
an information delivery strategy that complies with the exchange
requirements.
information requirements (EIR) in a standardised method.
<The example below demonstrates the expected delivery team’s BIM execution plan (BEP) content,
which could either be adopted directly or modified to best suit the project requirements.>
Supplementary documents:
2 Information requirements
Each requirement should The delivery team shall detail their approach and programme in
align with the information order to comply with these requirements.
exchanges/delivery
milestones and be suitable
for the relevant delivery
team’s appointment.
<The information purposes could be identified either in this section or appended to the exchange
information requirements (EIR). They should align with, or be equivalent to, the project information
requirements (PIR), where applicable:>
<Provide an explanation of the staged approach of the project, which could be a reference to a national
standard.>
Information delivery
milestones are predefined
points where specified
information deliverables Information should be exchanged throughout the life of a project,
are exchanged, at various to enable decision-making at crucial milestones. The following
stages of a project. milestones are to be adhered to on the project/appointment.
Specify these milestones
for the project and relevant
appointments.
<The delivery milestones should reflect the project information requirements (PIR), where applicable.
Table 2.1) uses the above plan of works project work stages mapped against the milestones and their
relevant deliverables. These should be a high-level overview description/title, with the detailed
specifications being identified in the following (corresponding) information requirements in the
subsections below.
Ensure that the information milestones allow the appointing party, and its stakeholders, an agreed
period to evaluate and validate the information deliverables.>
Identify any security All information generated for this project shall comply with the
requirements that are to following information security requirements. As a minimum, the
be adhered to on this baseline security measures defined below shall apply to all
project. project stages:
<The ISO 19650–5:2020 security triage (Section 4.7) should be used to help to identify whether a
security management plan is required. If this is the case, a reference should be provided. If it isn’t
required, an organisation’s default information security requirement could be identified or referenced.>
• All design
• GA plans and elevations
information in Information delivered to
• {Client’s @ 1:200 or 1:500
PDF format
name} • Visuals project specification and
1 Feasibility study • A spreadsheet N/A
project brief • GIA schedule m² adhering to project
including the units information standards
• Notional occupancy rates shown (.xlsx)
<This section provides an explanation of the information requirements for the project information model
(PIM) information delivery milestone. As this typically signifies part of the end of the delivery phase of
an asset, it is important to describe the expected information deliverables. The information standards,
information production methods and procedures for the deliverables are identified in Section 3.>
<This section provides an explanation of the information deliverables for the asset information model
(AIM) information delivery milestone. The asset information requirements (AIR) should be referenced,
where applicable, or included in this section. The information standards, information production
methods and procedures for the deliverables are identified in Section 3.>
Exchange Information Requirements 15
Guidance
Provide project-specific
key performance
indicators (KPIs) that The lead appointed party is required to calculate and report the
support the commercial key performance indicators (KPIs) to the appointing party at
drivers. These should be agreed intervals.
quantifiable data that This enables the appointing party to determine the success of
provides the appointing their commercial building information modelling (BIM) aspirations;
party with an overview of the following key performance indicators (KPIs) have been
whether they are achieving identified.
the relevant commercial
aspirations.
<The example below, Table 2.3 (Key performance indicators (KPIs)), demonstrates possible key
performance indicators (KPIs) relating to the commercial drivers.>
Responsibility
Work
Frequency
KPIs Requirement and deliverable stage/
milestone
Identify the specific health The information models should be utilised to meet both the health
and safety requirements and safety and design and construction risk management
for the project. Expand on construction obligations of the project. This should be delivered in
the specific health and accordance with {name of standard}.
safety deliverables that the
delivery team will have to The delivery team is required to inform the appointing party of the
incorporate into the potential hazards and risks. This shall be communicated within
information model. the information model via the common data environment (CDE).
<The example below, Table 2.4 (Health and safety information requirements), demonstrates the
possible health and safety requirements that could be adopted. Alternatively, references to relevant
standards and/or protocols could be provided. Timeframes should be defined.
The appointing party has provided the following guidance for the key health and safety deliverables
against each milestone.
Exchange Information Requirements 17
Guidance
<Outline the purpose of the information standards, information methods and procedures for the
exchange information requirements (EIR) for the project.
This section has been included in the exchange information requirements (EIR) to assist with the
adoption of the ISO 19650 standard series, particularly in traditional projects where the delivery teams
work consecutively. However, this section could be separated to form its own contractual project
document, which would benefit projects where multiple delivery teams are working simultaneously,
reducing the potential for error by providing a single version of these information standards, information
production methods and procedures.
Amend this section to ensure that the information supplied to the appointing party meets the exchange
information requirements (EIR), which should include project information requirements (PIR) and asset
information requirements (AIR).>
<The example below demonstrates project-specific standards that could be adopted. Any standards
(both internal and external) that are to be used on the project should be listed, including their
revision/version. These should be reflected within the main body of the document.>
If any of the standards detailed above or throughout this document are superseded during the project,
the lead appointed party shall provide the appointing party with a report detailing the change in standard
and any implications that the adoption of these changes will have for the project.
The revised standard can only be implemented following an explicit agreement from the appointing
party.
Exchange Information Requirements 20
Guidance
Information identification
conventions (naming
conventions) are an
essential part of the
production of information. To realise true project efficiencies, it is essential that information
They allow easy containers be easy to locate and identify, without being reliant on
identification of the data, the structure of the common data environment (CDE). The use of
such as information type, a consistent information container identification convention
the originator and the area (naming conventions) is key to achieving this.
of the project that
information relates to, This section contains specific references to identification
without opening the conventions for files, spaces and objects.
information container.
Provide either a detailed explanation of the identification for information containers, spaces and
objects/elements within your project or references to identification standards that should be adhered
to.>
Information container identification conventions should follow the definitions outlined in ISO 19650–
1:2018.
Each data field represents a specific property with an associated code, including the permitted number
of characters for each.
Metadata is a fundamental
part of the common data
environment (CDE)
management. Metadata
helps to manage the
Information containers should include a metadata field; this could
information workflow.
be achieved via the common data environment (CDE) for
Identify metadata
metadata associated with file containers. The delivery team
requirements, which will
should describe how they will implement the following metadata
depend on the complexity
requirements.
of the project.
All files shall be populated with appropriate metadata in
This section should specify
accordance with the requirements below.
the metadata that is to be
assigned to all information
containers within the
common data environment
(CDE).
<The example below demonstrates potential subsections that provide further information about
metadata requirements, aligned with ISO 19650–2:2018, using the codification identified from the
United Kingdom’s National Annex (NA). An applicable National Annex could be adopted.>
Security classification
<The example below, Table 3.3: Security metadata), demonstrates possible security classification; it
is important that this section be modified to suit both project and/or national requirements.>
Publicly Available Information approved for publication outside the appointed party
PA
information system.
Internal Use Only Information for appointing party {client name} only and authorised
IO
appointed party.
Critical National Information that relates to critical national infrastructure systems and
CNI Infrastructure processes utilised for the safe, secure and reliable transmission of
electricity and gas.
Information classification
To articulate the specified level of information need, the following properties have been assigned to
information within the responsibility matrix:
• Level of detail (LOD) refers to the amount of detail shown in the graphical digital representation,
at a particular stage of the project.
• Level of information (LOI) refers to the amount of information (data) contained/associated with
the model at a particular stage of the project.
Both the level of detail (LOD) and level of information (LOI) will increase through the life cycle of a
project, potentially at different rates, and they are therefore specified separately. These shall be defined
using the NBS definitions library available at https://toolkit.thenbs.com/definitions
Exchange Information Requirements 24
Guidance
<The example below, Table 3.4 (Preferred software authoring tools), demonstrates possible data
authoring requirements in a table format that provides a list of desirable software for model and drawing
authoring.>
To support the use of, and access to, information for all project stakeholders, the following guidelines
shall be met:
<The example below, Table 3.5 (Required exchange formats), demonstrates possible data exchange
formats.>
<The example below, Table 3.6 (Information software platforms), demonstrates proposed information
software platforms. Outline what systems are to be utilised by your organisation, including version
requirements, where applicable.>
Exchange Information Requirements 26
Guidance
If the delivery team do not wish to use these specific software solutions for the delivery or production of
project information, they should recognise the above listed platforms and identify how they will
exchange information with these platforms.
Any restrictions when interfacing with the above systems should be raised with the appointing party
prior to using systems other than those listed here. These limitations shall include:
<The example below, Table 3.7: Quality requirements), demonstrates a possible quality assurance and
quality control methodology that may be adopted in table format. Ensure that the minimum expectation
of all information is outlined.>
<Define information production methods and procedures, as specified within ISO 19650–2:2018, 5.1.5,
which should reflect the purpose and functionality required for the information deliverables.>
<ISO 19650–1:2018 Annex A, Table 3.8 (Information management responsibility matrix), provides an
RACI (responsible, accountable, consulted and informed) matrix for the information management
functions. If adopted, this should be completed to identify the delivery teams’ responsibilities. This table
could be expanded or reduced to suit; ensure that it includes only the relevant activities for the project.>
Key
R Responsible for undertaking activity
A Accountable for activity completion
C Consulted during activity
I Informed following activity completion
Exchange Information Requirements 28
Guidance
Appointed party
Information management activity
Third party
Appoint individuals to undertake the information management function.
Mobilise resources.
Appointed party
Information management activity
Third party
Check availability of reference information and shared resources.
Generate information.
Define the expectations for Collaboration of all project information is key to effective project
collaboration on this delivery. Collaboration is enabled by the project tools, for
project and describe the example, the common data environment (CDE), but it is made
relevant collaboration effective by the culture and tone set by the leadership team.
processes. This should Improved processes for sharing information should not suppress
include information traditional informal collaboration such as holding meetings but
exchanges and meetings rather provide efficiencies by forming a ‘single source of the
for the whole delivery truth’.
team.
The following subsections outline the project’s collaboration.
requirements.
Exchange Information Requirements 30
Guidance
<The example below demonstrates a high-level common data environment (CDE) workflow, which
could be adopted or modified to suit your project needs. Ensure that each expected procedure is
outlined, including responsibilities, where appropriate. It is expected that the lead appointed party may
wish to expand this section following their appointment.>
Figure 3.1: Common data environment (CDE) workflow) below illustrates the process overview that the
delivery team must use for the creation, collaboration and issue of project information. This is required
for consistency, ensuring that information is managed and delivered in a timely manner.
This workflow is based on the ISO 19650–1:2018, Figure 10 (Common data environment (CDE))
concept.
Exchange Information Requirements 31
Guidance
Diagram key:
1. The delivery team will produce their information either on a separate common data environment
(CDE) solution or on their local server. When information is ready to be shared with the delivery
team, the task team will perform their quality control procedures to ensure that information
meets the information standard. If the information container is deemed suitable, it will be
uploaded to the common data environment (CDE) as SHARED. SHARED information
containers with an appropriate status may be used by the delivery team for collaboration
purposes. These information containers are referenced by the relevant task teams to support
the development of their own information. This process happens until a sufficient degree of
information has met the requirements to fulfil an information delivery milestone.
2. When information is ready to be submitted for project stage completion at an information
delivery milestone, it is uploaded to the common data environment (CDE) as SHARED with the
appropriate status code (see Section 4.3.1), which informs the lead appointed party that the
information container is ready to be authorised and accepted, if appropriate.
Authorised/accepted information containers will be uploaded to the common data environment
(CDE) as PUBLISHED; typically, PUBLISHED information containers will become the project
information model (PIM).
3. ARCHIVE facilitates an audit trail of all the information containers shared and published
throughout the project.
Exchange Information Requirements 32
Guidance
3.2.2.3 Mobilisation
3.2.2.4 Training
Team inductions should occur when a new task team joins the project and/or after any subsequent
changes to building information modelling (BIM) documentation.
Records of previous and ongoing training will be submitted to the appointing party upon request. This
can include a register of completed training, as well as sample material used in the delivery of training.
<Below is an example of possible authorisation and acceptance processes that align with the ISO 19650
standard series that may be adopted, if suitable for the project needs. Provide a step-by-step guide that
instructs the prospective delivery team how to submit information and the various outcomes.>
Authorisation
1. The task team will upload the information as SHARED with the appropriate status code (in line
with Section X.X.X), which identifies that the information container is suitable for lead appointed
Exchange Information Requirements 34
Guidance
party authorisation. If the common data environment (CDE) does not have the functionality to
notify the lead appointed party of the information status and upload, it will be the responsibility
of the originator to inform them of the intent to submit information for authorisation.
2. The lead appointed party will verify the information/work package against the master
information delivery plan (MIDP), appointing party exchange information requirements and lead
appointed party exchange information requirements:
a. If the information does not conform to the information requirements for that information
exchange, this will be identified within the common data environment (CDE) feedback
function, and this should notify the originator that the information requires amendments
before resubmitting it to the lead appointed party for authorisation.
b. If the information is authorised, the lead appointed party will ask the relevant task teams
to submit the information, via the common data environment (CDE), for appointing party
acceptance, if applicable.
Acceptance
3. The task team will upload the authorised information as SHARED with the appropriate status
code (in line with Section X.X.X), which identifies that the information container is ready for
appointing party authorisation. If the common data environment (CDE) does not have the
functionality to notify the appointing party of the information status and upload, it will be the
responsibility of the lead appointed party to inform them of the intent to submit information for
authorisation.
4. The appointing party will verify the information/work package against the master information
delivery plan (MIDP) and appointing party exchange information requirements:
a. If the information does not comply with the information requirements for that information
exchange, the relevant metadata will be applied to all information containers associated
with this information exchange via the common data environment (CDE). This should
notify the information originator that the information requires amendments before
resubmitting it to the appointing party for authorisation.
b. If the information is authorised, the party responsible for managing the common data
environment (CDE) will apply the relevant metadata so that these information
containers are considered PUBLISHED.
Failure to authorise or accept deliverables according to the master information delivery plan (MIDP) will
not imply an additional variation/compensation to the contract.
<If any legacy information (past planning applications, etc.) or shared resources would assist with the
development of the project, they should be made available to the delivery team. Use this section to
provide the information reference and its intended usage.>
All legacy information and shared resources are located within the common data environment (CDE)
and shown in Table 3.9 (Legacy information and shared resources).
Information name/
Reference Format Origin Allowed usage
description
LT09-MML-00-XX-M3-C- Existing infrastructure
XYZ MML For reference only
0001 model
<Format> <Informatio
<Insert information <Insert information name <Insert information
n
container identifier> or description> container identifier>
originator>
<Outline the method for capturing existing information relating to the project.>
Exchange Information Requirements 36
Guidance
<The example below demonstrates possible information container breakdown structure requirements.
These could be modified to suit project needs.>
The information container breakdown structure should divide the project information model (PIM) into
discipline-specific subsets such as:
• Civil engineering
• Landscape
• Architecture
• Structural
• Mechanical
• Electrical
If more breakdown/subsets are required because of the anticipated file size or project complexity, this
should be identified in proposed amendments to the information standard as part of the tender response
by the prospective lead appointed party.
The information container breakdown is considered the first step to spatial coordination within the
project; it should explain the methodology to manage the interfaces associated with the different
disciplines during the project, as well as any intended federations of information container breakdowns.
Figure 3.2 (Volume strategy; source: ISO 19650:2)Error! Reference source not found. provides a
federation strategy example in case of a linear infrastructure project. The different discipline areas are
depicted in different colours.
Exchange Information Requirements 37
Guidance