Chronic Inflammation in The Etiology of Disease
Chronic Inflammation in The Etiology of Disease
Chronic Inflammation in The Etiology of Disease
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0675-0
Although intermittent increases in inflammation are critical for survival during physical injury and infection, recent research
has revealed that certain social, environmental and lifestyle factors can promote systemic chronic inflammation (SCI) that can,
in turn, lead to several diseases that collectively represent the leading causes of disability and mortality worldwide, such as
cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and autoimmune and
neurodegenerative disorders. In the present Perspective we describe the multi-level mechanisms underlying SCI and several
risk factors that promote this health-damaging phenotype, including infections, physical inactivity, poor diet, environmental
and industrial toxicants and psychological stress. Furthermore, we suggest potential strategies for advancing the early diagno-
sis, prevention and treatment of SCI.
O
ne of the most important medical discoveries of the past two mortality6–8. In this Perspective, we describe these effects and out-
decades has been that the immune system and inflamma- line some promising avenues for future research and intervention.
tory processes are involved in not just a few select disorders,
but a wide variety of mental and physical health problems that dom- Inflammation
inate present-day morbidity and mortality worldwide1–4. Indeed, Inflammation is an evolutionarily conserved process characterized
chronic inflammatory diseases have been recognized as the most by the activation of immune and non-immune cells that protect the
significant cause of death in the world today, with more than 50% of host from bacteria, viruses, toxins and infections by eliminating
all deaths being attributable to inflammation-related diseases such pathogens and promoting tissue repair and recovery2,9. Depending
as ischemic heart disease, stroke, cancer, diabetes mellitus, chronic on the degree and extent of the inflammatory response, includ-
kidney disease, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and auto- ing whether it is systemic or local, metabolic and neuroendocrine
immune and neurodegenerative conditions5. Evidence is emerg- changes can occur to conserve metabolic energy and allocate more
ing that the risk of developing chronic inflammation can be traced nutrients to the activated immune system9–12. Specific biobehav-
back to early development, and its effects are now known to per- ioral effects of inflammation thus include a constellation of energy-
sist throughout the life span to affect adulthood health and risk of saving behaviors commonly known as “sickness behaviors,” such as
1
Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA, USA. 2Stanford 1000 Immunomes Project, Institute for Immunity, Transplantation and Infection,
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 3Institute for Research in Translational Medicine, Universidad Austral, CONICET, Pilar, Buenos
Aires, Argentina. 4Iuve Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA. 5Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA. 6Center for Primary Health Care Research,
Lund University/Region Skåne, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden. 7Medical Scientist Training Program, University of California, San Francisco,
San Francisco, CA, USA. 8IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. 9Department of Applied Mathematics and Laboratory of
Systems Biology of Aging, Lobachevsky University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia. 10Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, National
Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. 11Centre for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Division of Medicine, University College London, London,
UK. 12MassGeneral Hospital for Children, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 13Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public
Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 14Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of
Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. 15Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy. 16Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University,
Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy. 17William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University, London, UK. 18Division
of Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 19Departments of Medicine and Genetics, Albert
Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 20Paul F. Glenn Center for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA,
USA. 21Center for Tissue Regeneration, Repair and Restoration, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA. 22Department of
Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 23Department of Pathology, University of California,
Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 24Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. 25Research Institute of the Hospital 12
de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain. 26Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Environmental
Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. 27NTP Interagency Center
for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department
of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. 28Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology and Department of Psychiatry and
Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. *e-mail: furmand@stanford.edu
Cardiovascular Cancer
Chronic disease
Physical infections
inactivity
Metabolic syndrome, Depression
type 2 diabetes
and NAFLD
Obesity
Auto-
immune
diseases
SCI
Dysbiosis
Neurodegenerative
diseases
Diet
Sarcopenia
Immunosenescence and osteoporosis
Xenobiotics
Disturbed
Isolation and sleep
chronic stress
Fig. 1 | Causes and consequences of low-grade systemic chronic inflammation. Several causes of low-grade systemic chronic inflammation (SCI)
and their consequences have been identified. As shown on the left, the most common triggers of SCI (in counter-clockwise direction) include chronic
infections, physical inactivity, (visceral) obesity, intestinal dysbiosis, diet, social isolation, psychological stress, disturbed sleep and disrupted circadian
rhythm, and exposure to xenobiotics such as air pollutants, hazardous waste products, industrial chemicals and tobacco smoking. As shown on the right,
the consequences of SCI (in clockwise direction) include metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), cardiovascular
disease, cancer, depression, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, sarcopenia, osteoporosis and immunosenescence.
associated with older age, whereas no effects were found for IL-1β, order to yield the most useful and predictive information for quan-
IFN-α or TNF-α50. Therefore, evidence exists that greater inflam- tifying age-related disease risk.
matory activity is associated with older age, but this is not true of
all inflammatory markers, and it is possible that these associations Sources of systemic chronic inflammation
are due at least in part to increases in chronic ailments and frailty The SCI state in older individuals is thought to be caused in part
that are frequently associated with age rather than to biological by a complex process called cellular senescence, which is charac-
aging itself. terized by an arrest of cell proliferation and the development of a
To address limitations associated with assessing only a few multifaceted senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP)53.
select inflammatory biomarkers, some researchers have employed A prominent feature of this phenotype is increased secretion of pro-
a multi-dimensional approach that involves assaying large numbers inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and other pro-inflammatory
of inflammatory markers and then combining these markers into molecules from cells53. Senescent cells expressing this phenotype
more robust indices representing heightened inflammatory activity. can in turn promote a multitude of chronic health conditions and
In one such study, researchers used principal component analysis to diseases, including insulin resistance, CVD, pulmonary arterial
identify pro- and anti-inflammatory markers and an innate immune hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, emphy-
response that significantly predicted risk for multiple chronic dis- sema, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases, macular degeneration,
eases (CVD, kidney disease and diabetes), in addition to mortality51. osteoarthritis and cancer54,55.
More recently, a multi-omics approach has been applied to How senescent cells acquire the SASP is not fully understood, but
examine links between SCI and disease risk. The researchers fol- existing research points to a combination of both endogenous and
lowed 135 adults longitudinally and conducted deep molecular non-endogenous social, environmental and lifestyle risk factors.
profiling of participants’ whole-blood gene expression, termed the Among the known endogenous causes of this phenotype are DNA
transcriptome; immune proteins—for example, cytokines and che- damage, dysfunctional telomeres, epigenomic disruption, mitogenic
mokines—termed the immunome; and cell subset frequencies, such signals and oxidative stress56. The non-endogenous contributors are
as CD8+ T cell subsets, monocytes, natural killer (NK) cells, B cells thought to include chronic infections57, lifestyle-induced obesity58,
and CD4+ T cell subsets. This enabled the researchers to construct microbiome dysbiosis59, diet60, social and cultural changes61,62 and
a high-dimensional trajectory of immune aging (IMM-AGE) that environmental and industrial toxicants63. The fact that differences
described individuals’ immune functioning better than their chron- exist in the extent to which older adults exhibit SCI52,64 is thought
ological age. This new metric in turn accurately predicted all-cause to be indicative of inter-individual differences in exposure to these
mortality, establishing its potential future use for identifying at-risk and other related pro-inflammatory factors, although studies docu-
patients in clinical settings52. These types of integrative, multi-level menting within-person associations between these risk factors and
approaches to characterizing SCI are promising, but this work is SCI are limited.
still in its infancy and much more research is needed to identify Nevertheless, differences in non-communicable diseases asso-
best practices for selecting and analyzing SCI-related biomarkers in ciated with SCI are evident across cultures and countries. Most
to areas of hypoxia and even cell death, resulting in activation of these effects, though. For example, orally absorbed advanced gly-
hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, increased production of reactive oxy- cation and lipoxidation end-products that are formed during the
gen species, and release of DAMPs (for example, cell-free DNA). processing of foods or when foods are cooked at high tempera-
These events can induce the secretion of numerous pro-inflamma- tures and in low-humidity conditions are appetite increasing and
tory molecules, including adipokines, cytokines (for example, IL-1β, are linked to overnutrition and hence obesity and inflammation132.
IL-6, TNF-α), and chemokines (especially monocyte chemoattrac- Furthermore, high-glycemic-load foods, such as isolated sugars
tant protein-1) by adipocytes, endothelial cells and resident adipose and refined grains, which are common ingredients in most ultra-
tissue immune cells (for example, macrophages)105–108. This in turn processed foods, can cause increased oxidative stress that activates
leads to the infiltration of various immune cells in the VAT, includ- inflammatory genes133.
ing monocytes, neutrophils, dendritic cells, B cells, T cells and NK Other dietary components that are thought to influence inflam-
lymphocytes, and a reduction in T regulatory cells, thereby ampli- mation include trans fatty acids134 and dietary salt. For example, salt
fying inflammation, which can eventually become prolonged and has been shown to skew macrophages toward a pro-inflammatory
systemic in some individuals106–109. phenotype characterized by the increased differentiation of naive
Furthermore, TNF-α and other molecules can cause adipocyte CD4+ T cells into T helper (TH)-17 cells, which are highly inflam-
insulin resistance, which increases lipolysis, with the resulting matory, and decreased expression and anti-inflammatory activity of
spillover of lipids into other organs, such as the pancreas and liver, T regulatory cells135. In addition, high salt intake can cause adverse
where they can contribute to beta-cell dysfunction, hepatic insulin changes in gut microbiota composition, as exemplified by the
resistance and fatty liver106. Hence, visceral obesity accelerates aging reduced Lactobacillus population observed in animals and humans
and increases risk for cardiometabolic, neurodegenerative and fed high-salt diets135. This specific population is critical for health as
autoimmune diseases, as well as several types of cancer19,104,106,110–112. it regulates TH17 cells and enhances the integrity of the intestinal epi-
These dynamics are known to occur in adults and can promote age- thelial barrier, thus reducing systemic inflammation135. Consistent
related disease risk, but they first emerge during childhood26. The with the expected health-damaging effects of consuming foods that
childhood obesity epidemic might thus be playing a key role in pro- are high in trans fats and salt, a recent cohort study of 44,551 French
moting inflammation and age-related disease risk worldwide113. adults who were followed for a median of 7.1 years found that a 10%
increase in the proportion of ultra-processed food consumption was
Microbiome dysbiosis. Obesity may also lead to SCI through gut associated with a 14% greater risk of all-cause mortality136.
microbiome-mediated mechanisms114. For example, studies con- Several other nutritional factors can also promote inflammation
ducted in moderately obese Danish individuals without diabetes115 and potentially contribute to the development of SCI. These factors
and in severely obese French women116 found changes in gut micro- include deficiencies in micronutrients, including zinc137 and magne-
biota composition and microbial gene richness that were correlated sium138, which are caused by eating processed or refined foods that
with increased fat mass, pro-inflammatory biomarkers and insulin are low in vitamins and minerals, and having suboptimal omega-3
resistance. Furthermore, in older adults, changes in the gut microbiota levels139, which impacts the resolution phase of inflammation. Long-
seem to influence the outcome of multiple inflammatory pathways59. chain omega-3 fatty acids—especially eicosapentaenoic acid and
Obesity, which is strongly linked to changes in the gut micro- docosahexaenoic acid—modulate the expression of genes involved
biome, has also been associated with increased intestinal paracel- in metabolism and inflammation139. More importantly, they are pre-
lular permeability and endotoxemia114,117. Moreover, the latter is cursors to molecules such as resolvins, maresins and protectins that
a suspected cause of inflammation through activation of pattern are involved in the resolution of inflammation28,29. The main con-
recognition receptors, such as Toll-like receptors, in immune cells tributors to the growing worldwide incidence of low omega-3 status
and of inflammation-mediated metabolic conditions such as insulin are a low intake of fish and high intake of vegetable oils that are high
resistance118. Interestingly, serum concentrations of zonulin, a pro- in linoleic acid, which displaces omega-3 fatty acids in cell mem-
tein that increases intestinal permeability, appear to be elevated in brane phospholipids140,141. In turn, various RCTs have shown that
obese children and adults117,119, and in persons with type 2 diabe- omega-3 fatty acid supplementation reduces inflammation142–144 and
tes118, NAFLD, coronary heart disease, polycystic ovary syndrome, may thus have health-promoting effects141–144.
autoimmune diseases and cancer117. More recently, elevated serum Evidence linking diet and mortality is robust. For example, an
zonulin concentrations have been found to predict inflammation analysis of nationally representative health surveys and disease-
and physical frailty120. specific mortality statistics from the National Center for Health
More broadly, it has been hypothesized that a complex balance Statistics in the United States showed that the dietary risk factors
exists in the intestinal ecosystem that, if disrupted, can compro- associated with the greatest mortality among American adults in
mise its function and integrity and in turn cause low-grade SCI59. It 2005 were high dietary trans fatty acids, low dietary omega-3 fatty
may thus be important to identify possible triggers of dysbiosis and acids, and high dietary salt145. In addition, a recent systematic analy-
intestinal hyperpermeability, which could potentially include the sis of dietary data from 195 different countries identified poor diet
overuse of antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and as the main risk factor for death in 2017, with excessive sodium
proton-pump inhibitors121,122; lack of microbial exposure induced intake being responsible for more than half of diet-related deaths146.
by excessive hygiene and reduced contact with animals and natural Finally, when combined with low physical activity, consuming
soils, which is a very recent phenomenon in human evolutionary hyperpalatable processed foods that are high in fat, sugar, salt and
history82,123; and diet123 (see below). flavor additives147 can cause major changes in cell metabolism and
lead to the increased production (and defective disposal) of dys-
Diet. The typical diet that has become widely adopted in many functional organelles such as mitochondria, as well as to misplaced,
countries over the past 40 years is relatively low in fruits, vegetables misfolded and oxidized endogenous molecules30,60,148. These altered
and other fiber- and prebiotic-rich foods66,123–125 and high in refined molecules, which increase with age19,30, can be recognized as DAMPs
grains124, alcohol126 and ultra-processed foods125, particularly those by innate immune cells, which in turn activate the inflammasome
containing emulsifiers127. These dietary factors can alter the gut machinery, amplify the inflammatory response1,30,60 and contribute
microbiota composition and function123,127–130 and are linked to to a biological state that has been called “inflammaging,” defined as
increased intestinal permeability129–131 and epigenetic changes in the the “the long-term result of the chronic physiological stimulation of
immune system129 that ultimately cause low-grade endotoxemia and the innate immune system” that occurs in later life30. As proposed,
SCI129–131. The influence of diet on inflammation is not confined to inflammaging involves changes in numerous organ systems, such
?, ?, ?
Onset
Chronic condition
Proinflammatory Extracellular
environment
Baseline pSTAT
Fold-change Intracellular
response
Cellular output
(reduced or altered)
Fig. 2 | The maternal exposome and low-grade systemic chronic
inflammation. Maternal lifestyle and environmental exposures—
collectively referred to as the exposome—include diet, physical activity, Immune system
psychological stress and exposure to various xenobiotics, such as function and physiology
pollutants and smoking during intrauterine life. These factors in turn
can influence the programming of the immune system of the offspring, Unhealthy
potentially leading to a more pro-inflammatory phenotype later in life. cardiovascular aging
Relevant factors, including environmental factors such as poor access to
healthy food, housing insecurity, psychological stress and polluted air, lead Time/age
to a mother giving birth to a fetus with epigenetic marks that increase the
Fig. 3 | Inflammatory model of immunosenescence and chronic disease.
child’s risk for obesity, low-grade SCI and its associated consequences in
This proposed model associates elevated baseline phosphorylated
adolescence and adulthood.
signaling proteins (for example, phosphorylated STAT (pSTAT) levels)
with cellular unresponsiveness and chronically elevated inflammatory
mortality worldwide and that cause enormous amounts of human activity. The model involves an elevation of baseline pSTAT levels and
suffering. At the same time, there are several key avenues that could its association with hallmark phenomenon of immunosenescence, an
be pursued to help strengthen this work and translate this research increased pro-inflammatory environment, unresponsive cells and a clinical
into effective strategies for improving human health. impact on immune response. (Adapted with permission from ref. 22,
First, there is a clear need for additional studies that collect data Elsevier.)
on multiple factors affecting SCI to form a more comprehensive pic-
ture of how exposures and experiences identified at different levels
of analysis combine to affect SCI and inflammation-related disease collected inflammatory biomarker data under basal conditions in
risk. Second, the field sorely needs robust integrative biomarkers of which the immune system is not challenged. This is a sensible
SCI that go beyond combining a few canonical biomarkers of acute starting place, but such research does not provide any informa-
inflammation. Existing biomarkers, which have primarily included tion regarding biological reactivity or recovery (for example, from
CRP, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α, have been useful for demonstrating infection or psychological or physiological stress), which may ulti-
that inflammatory activity is related to disease and mortality risk, mately be most useful for understanding individual differences in
but these markers provide only limited mechanistic information inflammation-related disease risk3,179. Finally, although many of the
(given the enormous complexity of the inflammatory response) and SCI-promoting factors that we have described herein are at least
they do not address anti-inflammatory regulatory pathways that partly modifiable—including physical inactivity, poor diet, night-
may also be relevant for influencing inflammation-related disease time blue light exposure, tobacco smoking, environmental and
risk. Future research should thus focus on additional biomarkers industrial toxicants exposure and psychological stress—the num-
that have been found to have substantial variability across indi- ber of studies that have successfully targeted these risk factors and
viduals, such as CD8+ T cell subsets, monocytes, NK cells, B cells shown corresponding reductions in SCI levels is limited. This has
and CD4+ T cell subsets176. This work should also include molec- occurred despite the fact that the association between inflammation
ular, transcriptional and proteomic markers of SCI, which have and chronic disease is now widely recognized and that healthcare
only been examined in limited ways to date177. Constructing bio- systems are buckling due to the enormous cost of treating a world-
markers that integrate information from a variety of different data wide population that is heavily burdened by SCI-related chronic
sources and levels of analysis to represent inflammatory activity and health problems. Therefore, the time to start seriously studying how
immune regulation and dysregulation would be particularly useful, to prevent and treat SCI-related disease risk in both children and
as would applying multi-omics approaches, computational model- adults is now.
ing and artificial intelligence to study how SCI-related mechanisms In conclusion, we have a long way to go before we fully under-
both change and predict changes in clinical status within individu- stand the role that SCI plays in disease risk, biological aging and
als over the life span178. mortality. For example, no study to date has assessed the entire
Third, given the difficulty associated with experimentally human exposome over the entire developmental trajectory, start-
manipulating factors such as diet, sleep and stress levels that ing in utero (for example, by measuring maternal exposures, type
affect inflammation, a majority of studies conducted thus far have of delivery and early-life nutrition) and continuing into adulthood