Chagas Disease
Chagas Disease
Chagas Disease
Chagas disease
Andréa Silvestre de Sousa, Debbie Vermeij, Alberto Novaes Ramos Jr, Alejandro O Luquetti
Chagas disease persists as a global public health problem due to the high morbidity and mortality burden. Despite the Published Online
possibility of a cure and advances in transmission control, epidemiological transformations, such as urbanisation and December 7, 2023
https://doi.org/10.1016/
globalisation, and the emerging importance of oral and vertical transmission mean that Chagas disease should be
S0140-6736(23)01787-7
considered an emerging disease, with new cases occurring worldwide. Important barriers to diagnosis, treatment,
Evandro Chagas National
and care remain, resulting in repressed numbers of reported cases, which in turn leads to inadequate public policies. Institute of Infectious Diseases,
The validation of new diagnostic tools and treatment options is needed, as existing tools pose serious limitations to Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio
access to health care. Integrated models of surveillance, with community and intersectional participation, embedded de Janeiro, Brazil
(A S de Sousa MD PhD,
in the concept of One Health, are essential for control. In addition, mitigation strategies for the main social
D Vermeij MsC); Department of
determinants of health, including difficulties imposed by migration, are important to improve access to comprehensive Internal Medicine, School of
health care in a globalised scenario. Medicine, Federal University of
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro,
Introduction Chagas disease and the significant associated economic Brazil (A S de Sousa);
Department of Community
Chagas disease, a neglected tropical disease also known burden,10 less than 10% of people with Chagas disease Health, School of Medicine,
as American trypanosomiasis, is a potentially life- have been diagnosed, and approximately 1% have Federal University of Ceará,
threatening illness caused by the protozoan parasite received antiparasitic treatment.11 Timely detection and Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
(A N Ramos Jr MD PhD); Center
Trypanosoma cruzi.1 It was discovered in 1909 by Brazilian treatment of Chagas disease has important benefits, of Studies for Chagas Disease,
scientist Carlos Ribeiro Justiniano Chagas in Minas including prevention of future vertical transmission in Hospital das Clínicas, Federal
Gerais, Brazil.2 In 2019, the World Health Assembly women of childbearing age who have been treated, University of Goiás, Goiânia,
recognised April 14 as World Chagas Disease Day, serological cure in infants and children, and potential Brazil (A O Luquetti MD PhD)
bringing visibility to the disease and strengthening reduction of progression to advanced forms of the Correspondence to:
Dr Andréa Silvestre de Sousa,
advocacy strategies.3 disease in adults.12–18
Evandro Chagas National
Chagas disease has been described by WHO and Institute of Infectious Diseases,
others as a “silent and silenced disease”,1,4 as the majority Parasite lifecycle Oswaldo Cruz Foundation,
of people with the disease will not present with Replicant and infective stages of T cruzi can be identified Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil
andrea.silvestre@fiocruz.br
symptoms, and there is a staggering shortage of relevant in the insect vector and mammalian hosts. Trypo
information, resulting in little attention from govern mastigotes circulating in the blood of hosts are
ments, researchers, health and education professionals, transformed in the vector’s intestine into replicating
institutional donors, and the general population. Chagas epimastigotes, which change into metacyclic trypo
disease is a chronic infectious condition that intrinsically mastigotes in the distal portion of their intestine, and
promotes and perpetuates poverty, and mainly are released in the insect’s faeces. These trypomastigotes
affects people with greater social vulnerability, causing penetrate the damaged skin or mucous membranes of
substantial physical, psychological, and socioeconomic the host, where they enter host cells and change into
challenges.3,5 Combatting the disease requires an replicating amastigotes, and are released into circulation
intersectoral approach, with the inclusion of civil society again in the form of trypomastigotes.19
and social movements, reflecting the voices of those The T cruzi parasite is classified into at least seven
affected by Chagas disease. Over the last decade, non- discrete typing units (DTUs), TcI–TcVI and Tcbat
governmental organisations focusing on Chagas disease (appendix).20,21 Some DTUs have been associated with See Online for appendix
have formed an international federation representing geographical distribution in epidemiological scenarios
endemic and non-endemic countries.3
Chagas disease has an acute phase, which generally
lasts 4–8 weeks and is often mild or asymptomatic, and a Search strategy and selection criteria
chronic phase. An estimated 30–40% of people who are Data for this Seminar were identified through searches of
infected but untreated will develop severe and sometimes PubMed and Embase between Oct 1, 2022, and Dec 23, 2022,
life-threatening medical conditions, including cardiac, with no language restrictions, using the following search
digestive, and neurological or associated alterations, terms: “Chagas disease”, “American trypanosomiasis”, or
which might require specific treatment. If untreated, “Trypanosoma cruzi”. We selected key references and seminal
infection is lifelong.6 If treated, the chance of progression papers, reviews, case reports, and relevant book chapters. We
might be reduced, but the effectiveness is variable and also reviewed abstracts from pertinent scientific meetings
not well defined. Symptomatic Chagas disease imposes and publications from international organisations such as
a substantial financial burden on health-care systems the Pan American Health Organization, WHO, and the Special
and societies,7 with an estimated US$690 million in Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases
health-care costs and $8 billion in annual economic from WHO from Jan 1, 2010, to Dec 1, 2022.
losses.8,9 Despite the high morbidity and mortality of
and clinical manifestations, but these aspects remain Congenital Chagas disease has progressively gained
poorly understood. Evidence is emerging that the diverse epidemiological relevance, and remains a crucial challenge
genetic makeup of the parasite is responsible for distinct for both endemic and non-endemic countries; however,
outcomes in diagnosis and treatment of Chagas disease, due to the neglected nature of the disease and the barriers
but this should be researched further. that persist in access to diagnosis, treatment, and care,
prevalence in pregnant women and newborns might be
Epidemiology underestimated.24,35,36 According to the last available weekly
Chagas disease is mainly found in Latin America, where epidemiological report on Chagas disease, an estimated
the large majority of the estimated 6–8 million people 1·12 million women of childbearing age are infected with
infected with the T cruzi parasite reside. In addition, the T cruzi parasite,25 and the vertical transmission
approximately 75 million people are at risk of contracting prevalence approaches 5%, with higher rates in high-risk
the disease.22 An estimated 30 000 new cases and more endemic areas.35,37 The incidence of congenital Chagas
than 10 000 Chagas disease-related deaths are reported disease is an estimated 8000 to 15 000 cases per year in
annually.22–24 According to the last weekly epidemiological Latin America.38 In the wake of progress in vector
report published by WHO in 2015, using data from 2010, transmission control, vertical transmission has become
Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Bolivia, and Colombia have the proportionately more relevant, accounting for about a
highest estimated number of cases, and Bolivia, third of new infections in 2010, and could perpetuate the
Argentina, and Paraguay have the highest estimated disease indefinitely, even in countries without vector
prevalence.25 Due to migratory movements associated transmission.39 The panel describes the mechanisms of
with political, health, environmental, and economic crises T cruzi transmission and suggests methods for prevention
in the endemic countries of origin, Chagas disease has and control.
now been recorded in several non-endemic countries in
Europe, as well as in the USA, Australia, and Japan, Clinical presentation
among other countries.26–28 Chagas disease infection evolves in two subsequent
In the early and mid 20th century, Chagas disease was phases. In general, the acute phase lasts 4–8 weeks and,
mainly restricted to vulnerable, rural areas in when symptomatic, tends to be perceived as an acute
Latin America, where vectorial transmission prevailed. illness, with persistent fever (>7 days), hepatosplenomegaly,
Nowadays, the epidemiological pattern of the disease lymphadenopathy, subcutaneous oedema (in limbs or
has shifted due to human dynamics, meaning it is face), and morbilliform rash.65,66 Romaña’s sign, a unilateral
present in urban settings and has an international scope. bipalpebral inflammatory oedema, conjunctival hyper
Chagas disease has become a global health problem, and aemia, and preauricular adenopathy indicate the reaction
has been inserted into strategic international agendas, of the host to penetration of T cruzi into the ocular mucosa.
such as the WHO 2030 Roadmap and the Sustainable Despite the low frequency, it is considered a pathognomonic
Development Goals.29 sign of Chagas disease.67 Other inflammatory reactions
In the 1990s, the Pan American Health Organization associated with the vector bite are inoculation chagomas.
(PAHO), in partnership with endemic countries, developed They indicate the entry of T cruzi and are not present in
multinational initiatives to strengthen the control and other forms of transmission, such as oral Chagas disease
surveillance of Chagas disease.30 According to PAHO, transmission. The acute phase usually has a self-limited
17 countries have achieved the interruption of intra evolution, and when properly diagnosed and treated, has a
domiciliary vectorial transmission by Triatoma infestans or high chance of cure, especially in children and newborns.6
Rhodnius prolixus.22 This interruption, combined with The acute disease related to oral transmission tends to
rural–urban migration, has substantially reduced the be more intense due to the high parasite inoculum, and
instances of vectorial transmission; however, eradication some outbreaks present with high lethality.68
of vectorial T cruzi transmission in the Americas is Haemorrhagic manifestations might be frequent,
impossible.30 Entomological surveillance actions should, making the differential diagnosis more complex in
therefore, be continuous, especially given emerging the Amazonian region, where other icterohaemorrhagic
challenges in Chagas disease epidemiology, such as syndromes like malaria are common. The distinct clinical
climate change combined with deforestation and the presentations with massive pericardial effusions and
human exposure to sylvatic scenarios; the adaptation of digestive bleeding are different from the acute phase
secondary and non-domiciliated vectors to the human associated with classic vector transmission.69,70
habitat; the increasing occurrence of alternative trans Other severe conditions associated with elevated
mission routes by vectors; and the rise of insecticide parasitaemia are the reactivation syndromes of Chagas
resistance. The complexity of these eco-epidemiological disease, which are also associated with immuno
factors can only be efficiently addressed from the concept suppression conditions.71 In the 1980s and 1990s, before
of One Health, an approach that includes collaborative the effective institution of highly active antiretroviral
efforts to attain optimal health for people, animals, and the therapy, individuals living with HIV and a CD4 count
environment.31–34 of less than 200 cells per µL could develop
cases. The isolated role of immune system senescence in occur concurrently, increasing the chance of disability.19
the eventual risk of Chagas disease reactivation is still not Increased life expectancy in endemic countries,
well established.74,75 The ageing of the population with the coupled with new lifestyles resulting from urbanisation,
disease, greater access to health services, are responsible for high rates of cardiovascular risk
immunosuppressive therapies (especially in non-ende factors, such as metabolic syndrome, and other
mic countries), and additional diagnoses of malignant associated heart diseases, such as cardiomyopathy in
neoplasms and autoimmune diseases (eg, rheumatological older patients.86 A distinction between the differential
diseases), might mean that reactivation episodes could diagnosis of Chagas heart disease and cardiomyopathy
become more frequent in this population in the future.76,77 in older patients might not always be possible, for
As in the acute phase, however, the response to instance, in cases of atrial fibrillation or even
antiparasitic treatment in these severe cases of reactivation bradyarrhythmia due to degenerative process, resulting
is appropriate (ie, more likely to lead to survival) when in the need for a pacemaker. In addition, the increase in
diagnosis is timely. life expectancy has contributed to an increase in the
Congenital Chagas disease is considered a T cruzi prevalence of chronic forms of Chagas disease,
infection in the acute phase. The associated clinical particularly in patients with access to diagnosis and
syndrome might vary widely, from absence of signs or treatment. As a result, people with the chronic cardiac
symptoms to evidence of non-specific manifestations form of the disease have a greater chance of survival,
such as fever, anaemia, hepatosplenomegaly, myocarditis, with greater recognition of the overlapping digestive
meningoencephalitis, or respiratory distress. There forms of the disease.87,88
might be progression to low birth weight, prematurity, Chagas heart disease can manifest through three major
miscarriage, or neonatal death.78 Cases with more severe syndromes; namely, sudden cardiac death, usually
evolution are particularly observed in contexts of associated with tachyarrhythmias, such as ventricular
transmission in the first weeks of pregnancy or in the arrhythmias, and often wrongly identified as a heart
presence of high parasitaemia. It is estimated that 28% of attack;89 heart failure, associated with varying degrees of
infants who are infected with T cruzi show clinical ventricular systolic dysfunction and increased filling
symptoms, and 2·2% progress to death.60 pressures; and thromboembolism, from related
Between 60% and 70% of people who are infected with intracavitary thrombi.90,91
T cruzi will never develop signs or symptoms of chronic Although the prognosis of Chagas heart disease is
Chagas disease, maintaining normal electro- typically poorer than that of other heart diseases, there is a
cardiograms (ECGs) and gastrointestinal tract x-rays in heterogeneity of scenarios in this cardiomyopathy. In the
longitudinal follow-up appointments.70,79 This absence of initial stages, patients with Chagas heart disease have no
signs or symptoms and maintenance of normal ECGs symptoms nor ventricular systolic dysfunction, and the
and x-rays represents the so-called chronic indeterminate disease can only be detected through active research of
form of Chagas disease, identified only by reactive typical electrocardiographic alterations (stage A). The
serology (IgG), characterised by a prognosis that is prognosis in this early stage is much more favourable than
similar to non-infected populations. Although substantial the symptomatic clinical forms with treatable heart failure
abnormalities might be found by more sophisticated (stage C), and even more than refractory syndrome
cardiovascular tests, the prognosis remains benign.79 In (stage D), where heart transplantation would be the only
this population, an annual clinical follow-up with an therapeutic option. People in intermediate stages of Chagas
ECG is essential, as the estimated annual progression heart disease do not manifest symptoms of heart failure,
rate from indeterminate chronic Chagas disease to but rather present progressive degrees of ventricular
Chagas heart disease is 1·9% (95% CI 1·3–3·0).80 Some systolic dysfunction, with or without segmental contractile
non-specific electrocardiographic alterations are not changes (stage B).92 Although alternative classifications
considered clinical progression (table 1).79,85 Antiparasitic have been used, they all seek the same objective of
treatment is encouraged for this clinical form, and its differentiating the prognosis in Chagas heart disease.84
success is related to sooner treatment, a low risk of Sudden cardiac death could be the first manifestation
reinfection, and factors associated with genetics and the of Chagas disease, occurring even in the latent and silent
type of parasite (eg, T cruzi DTU). phase of the disease when those who are infected with
The remaining 30–40% of people with Chagas disease T cruzi are unaware of their status, and is identified as
will evolve to chronic symptomatic forms within the leading cause of death in Chagas heart disease.
10–30 years, such as Chagas heart disease, the most Predicting the risk of this event is one of the great
prevalent symptomatic form, and digestive forms, challenges in managing Chagas disease. Implantable
characterised by megaoesophagus or megacolon (or cardioverter defibrillators are indicated for the prevention
both). Digestive forms occur mainly in countries south of of malignant arrhythmic events in patients at high risk of
the equator, which could be related to the genetic diversity sudden cardiac death.90,93
of the parasite, but the scientific data on this are scarce. Although the digestive forms of Chagas disease present
Cardiac-associated and digestive-associated forms might a better prognosis in relation to heart disease, they are
responsible for substantial reductions in the quality of life. bronchoaspiration.94 Oesophageal cancer might overlap
Oesophagopathy is manifested by progressive dysphagia, with more severe cases.95 Megacolon might result in
odynophagia, oesophageal reflux, and megaoesophagus persistent constipation (>5–7 days), with recurrent
associated with achalasia, malnutrition, and risk of faecalomas that, in addition to abdominal discomfort and
Table 1: Diagnostic strategies for Chagas disease by history and physical examination
functional limitation, might progress to intestinal loop and more affordable test than other techniques such as
torsion (sigmoid volvulus), with intestinal obstruction and PCR is the fresh smear, where very rapid movements of
mesenteric infarction, requiring urgent surgery. The main the parasite (thereby displacing red blood cells) might be
clinical manifestations of chronic Chagas disease and their observed, confirming the diagnosis. This technique
economic and social effects are described in figure 1. requires an experienced technician. As parasitaemia
declines over time, the sensitivities of the parasitological
Laboratory diagnosis tests reduce 20–30 days after the first symptoms, and
For diagnostic purposes, it is important to distinguish concentration tests, such as microhaematocrit or Strout
between the two Chagas disease phases, acute and techniques, can be used.44,92,96 Serial exams are
chronic, due to the difference in parasitaemia and the recommended to obtain higher positivity in a non-
techniques necessary for a successful diagnosis. congenital scenario of acute Chagas disease.
Chagas disease antibodies in the acute phase, as for any
Acute phase infectious disease, are primarily of IgM class and might be
In the acute phase, T cruzi parasites are detectable in found after the first 10–15 days of symptoms. Nevertheless,
peripheral blood, which should be investigated. An easier there are no commercially available kits and positive
Systolic dysfunction Segmental changes Sympathetic Heart conduction Motility changes Constipation
(fibrosis) denervation disorders dysphagia megacolon
megaoesophagus intestinal volvulus
Figure 1: Clinical manifestations, and economic and social burden of chronic Chagas disease
controls are difficult to find. The single finding of high parasites has been the loop-mediated isothermal
titres of IgM cannot be deemed conclusive, as they can be amplification, which is easier to perform than PCR for
detected in some infected individuals in the chronic phase amplification of DNA, and is able to detect T cruzi in
of the disease. Rheumatoid factor might give false-positive samples from newborns and immuno suppressed
reactions (frequently high in the acute phase of infectious patients.101,102
diseases), and IgM is absent in most newborns infected Reactivation can be diagnosed by direct detection of
with T cruzi.44 Faced with these difficulties, seroconversion parasites in blood, cerebrospinal fluid, biopsy samples
(an increase of 2 or more titres of IgG antibodies) is taken from any transplanted organ, and other tissue
considered a more useful tool in suspect acute Chagas samples (such as subcutaneous nodules). Specific signs of
disease (excluding congenital transmission), when blood acute Chagas disease, including fever, lymphadenopathy,
collections are performed at intervals of 20–40 days. jaundice, skin rash, and liver changes, might occur with
A diagnosis of congenital Chagas disease can only be clinical features of myocarditis, panniculitis,
ruled out if, in addition to the negative parasitological meningoencephalitis, and brain abscess. Alternatively,
examination close to birth, no anti-T cruzi antibodies of reactivation might be asymptomatic, and in post-transplant
the IgG class are detected from 9 months of age, when cases, the differential diagnosis with cellular rejection
the presence of circulating maternal antibodies is no might be difficult, as the clinical picture and
longer expected.38,97 histopathological findings are similar. The identification of
There are other tools that might be used to detect amastigote nests in tissue samples by direct visualisation
parasites, such as animal inoculation, xenodiagnosis, or PCR, or detection of antigens by immunohistochemistry,
haemoculture, and PCR.44,92,96 Real-time PCR (rtPCR) is allow for a diagnosis. Furthermore, transplant rejection
an automated technique developed to detect and amplify often precedes reactivation. Positive qualitative results
T cruzi DNA, which might quantify the parasite load. from parasitological exams (eg, PCR, blood culture, or
Because there are different techniques and protocols, the xenodiagnosis) from blood of people chronically infected
commercial kits currently available must follow with T cruzi do not confirm the diagnosis, but quantitative
harmonisation and standardisation criteria validated by analyses that show a gradual increase in parasitaemia do,
specialists. Due to the presence of high and consistent beyond direct parasitological tests. Serology might be
parasitaemia in the acute phase, rtPCR has been useful only in cases of seronegative recipients receiving
identified as a promising technique to be validated for organs from seropositive donors.103
the diagnosis of vertical transmission.98 The usefulness
of rtPCR has also been described in immunosuppressed Chronic phase
cases and recipients of solid organs or bone marrow During the chronic phase, direct parasitological diagnosis
transplants,99 allowing the identification of a gradual is compromised due to the usual low parasitaemia.
increase in parasitaemia as an early and sensitive marker Therefore, most of the tests that are used for laboratorial
of reactivations.100 Another promising tool for detecting diagnosis look for anti-T cruzi antibodies, from IgG class
(mainly IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses) detected for life in the treatment of Chagas disease; namely, nifurtimox and
people who are untreated. Although most individuals benznidazole, which were both discovered between
with T cruzi infection (around 75–80%) have high the 1960s and 1970s. Both drugs are effective in reducing
concentrations of antibodies, approximately 15% have the duration and clinical severity of Chagas disease by
intermediate concentrations, and a minority (5%) have enabling parasite elimination when cases are treated
low antibody concentrations, which makes the follow-up early in the natural history of the disease (in acute,
of treated individuals more difficult.44 Spontaneous cure congenital, and some chronic Chagas disease cases, in
has been exceptionally described,104 but additional studies addition to cases of reactivation in immunosuppressed
estimate this possibility to be less than 1%.105 hosts), with potential gains in terms of quality of life by
WHO106 and PAHO59 strongly recommend the use of at overcoming eventual physical limitations; however, the
least two serological tests that represent different available therapeutic regimens can lead to unwanted
methodological principles or different sorts of antigens: adverse reactions and treatment discontinuation.17,59 As
one being of high sensitivity (eg, indirect immuno an infectious disease with a chronic course comprising
fluorescence or the immunoenzymatic test referred to as several disabling clinical syndromes, the treatment of
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), and one of high Chagas disease should adopt the concept of
specificity (eg, indirect haemagglutination). If both tests comprehensive care, with different objectives: to promote
are reactive, the serum is positive and belongs to an the clearance of parasites using antiparasitic drugs,
individual infected with T cruzi. If both are non-reactive, aiming at cure or at least reducing parasitaemia, thereby
the individual is not infected. Should one test be reactive preventing clinical progression and vertical trans
and the other non-reactive, a third test should be used. mission;18 to manage and provide symptomatic treatment
Through the proper use of serological tests, it is possible for the chronic cardiac or digestive forms of Chagas
to correctly diagnose up to 98% of the sera tested; disease (or both); and to provide psychosocial support to
however, cross reactions might occur, mainly in Chagas people with Chagas disease and their families. Treatment
disease-endemic regions that are also endemic for is expected to prevent or at least decrease morbidity,
leishmaniasis (in most cases, visceral leishmaniasis). disability, and mortality associated with Chagas disease.65
A substantial improvement to the diagnostic process of
chronic Chagas disease includes the use of rapid Effectiveness
diagnostic tests as a point-of-care screening tool.107 Many The effectiveness of both benznidazole and nifurtimox
kits are available with different behaviours83 and an array depends on the phase of the disease. For congenital
of specific antigens. Advantages are clear, as no laboratory transmission, both drugs are very effective when used in
personnel is necessary, and the result can be read the first year of life.61,108 At the recent chronic phase, when
immediately, facilitating the diagnose and treat principle. parasites have been circulating for a short time (<10 years,
Disadvantages are mainly due to a lower sensitivity when for instance in children <12 years) the percentage of cure is
compared with other serological methods, so a rapid around 60%;14,109 however, in chronic cases where the
diagnostic test should not be used as a single test for parasite has been present for at least two decades, the rate
diagnosis. Positive results obtained through rapid of cure is around 20–40%, but this can only be established
diagnostic tests should be confirmed through serologies, after a significant period of follow-up.110 Age cannot be
to certify that the individual is infected. used as a cutoff point for treatment if the transmission
The use of parasitological tests in the chronic phase is mechanism is not evaluated, considering that recent cases
not encouraged for diagnostic purposes, as parasites are of oral transmission can occur in any age group
scarce or absent in blood; however, they might be applied (eg, an individual aged 50 years might be in the acute or
with immunosuppressed patients to monitor reactivation. recent chronic phase of Chagas disease, with a high chance
PCR is usually used due to a high sensitivity and of cure).111
quantification capacity, which means it is able to measure In an international controlled clinical trial,
the parasitic load. PCR is also useful after treatment with benznidazole was shown to not be able to reduce
parasiticidal drugs, when a positive result detects mortality in patients with advanced Chagas heart
treatment failure.102 disease,112 which is why it is very important that diagnosis
A clinician might be faced with different real-life occurs in the early stages of the Chagas disease, when
situations, with each requiring a different demand for treatment is not contraindicated and is associated with
laboratory tests to exclude or confirm a T cruzi infection. clinical benefits. Table 2 describes the indications,
Table 1 describes different diagnostic strategies, as well contraindications, objectives, doses, and main adverse
as necessary clinical and surveillance actions. events of the available antiparasitic drugs.
A new variable that should be considered when it
Antiparasitic treatment comes to the effectiveness of treatment is the T cruzi
Ensuring access to effective, efficient, and safe DTU. Remarkable differences were seen in a study of
antiparasitic treatment for T cruzi infection remains a children younger than 12 who were treated in Honduras
challenge. There are only two effective drugs available for (DTU TcI), children younger than 15 who were treated in
(58%) were seronegative 1 year after treatment, but only a Patients with congenital Chagas disease Cure, success rate approximately 100%
few (0–5·4%) had the same results in Bolivia, with Patients with other acute Chagas disease Cure, success rate approximately 60–80%
identical protocols being followed. Patients with reactivation (immunosuppression) Reduce parasitaemia and mortality
Therapeutic effect is measured by a decline in antibody Pregnant women Treat the mother only after pregnancy, except in
life-threatening conditions
response, which might take some years given the strong
Chronic indeterminate Chagas disease
antibody response to an array of different antigens of
Children aged <12 years Cure, success rate approximately 60%
T cruzi. In recent clinical trials, PCR has been used for
Adolescents and adults aged <50 years Cure, success rate 20–40%; reduce organ damage
post-treatment follow-up, with therapeutic failure detected
in the presence of positive results; however, the clinical Adults ≥50 years old Shared decision on treatment; rule out other
clinical conditions (eg, hepatic or renal failure) to
relevance of this result still requires further evaluation.116 reduce organ damage; if recent infection is
Although regional guidelines suggest comparability of suspected, which is more frequent in cases of
efficacy between benznidazole and nifurtimox based on oral transmission, age alone should not be a
limiting factor for treatment
observational studies,59 there are no randomised protocols
Girls and women of childbearing age (rule out pregnancy Reduce vertical transmission rate
in the context of acute T cruzi infection, and currently and recommend contraception during the treatment of
there are two ongoing clinical trials comparing the women of childbearing age)
two drugs in the chronic phase of Chagas disease.113,114 The Pregnant women Treat the mother only after pregnancy; lactation
efficacy of new imidazoles such as posaconazole and is not a contraindication
ravuconazole has been evaluated in randomised clinical Mild cardiac chronic Chagas disease*
trials, with negative results, although dose and treatment All age groups Shared decision on treatment, possible benefit if
durations differed from those indicated by preclinical there is no contraindication
studies and pharmacodynamic models.117–120 Advanced chronic Chagas disease
On the basis of results of combined evaluations of All age groups Do not treat
these new drugs with shorter or reduced doses of Benznidazole and nifurtimox have similar benefits according to observational studies (randomised trials comparing
benznidazole, especially by the BENDITA study,119 it is benznidazole and nifurtimox are in progress).113,114 According to guidelines, the choice depends on acceptability and
availability in each country. *Without systolic dysfunction or heart failure.
postulated that lower doses of drugs than currently
recommended could maintain efficacy, with fewer Table 2: Indications, contraindications, and objectives for benznidazole and nifurtimox
adverse events and less treatment discontinuation. In
this respect, studies evaluating redosing regimens of nifurtimox) and similar for adults (5–31% with
benznidazole and nifurtimox for adults are in benznidazole and 14·3% with nifurtimox).125,126
progress.113,114,121–123 In a recent prospective, historically
controlled study, the 60-day treatment regimen of Treatment follow-up
nifurtimox was more effective than the same dosing for A positive parasitological result after treatment indicates
30 days in children aged 0–17 years, but the 60-day and treatment failure. Reintroduction of the same drug for a
30-day nifurtimox regimens appeared to be equally new 60-day treatment could be an alternative, as well as
efficacious in children younger than 2 years.61 the use of the other drug (ie, nifurtimox if benznidazole
Recent studies show the dormancy capacity of appears to have failed). Serological cure, defined by the
intracellular amastigotes, which can resist treatment absence of antibodies, is more easily attainable in treated
while remaining metabolically inactive, with the ability to infants aged up to 1 year, due to the limited circulation
later transform into trypomastigotes. Therefore, the time of the parasite. When T cruzi has been present for
search for compounds capable of overcoming dormancy years, the total absence of antibodies becomes more
might be the key to more effective treatment.124 difficult, due to strong immunological memory. A new
approach based on the enzymatic effect of the parasite to
Tolerance cleave apo-lipoprotein has been suggested to ascertain
Both nifurtimox and benznidazole might cause adverse cure in children treated with nifurtimox.127
reactions, with better tolerance among children aged
under 12 years (table 3). Nifurtimox is mainly associated Chagas disease comprehensive care
with weight loss and psychiatric adverse effects, and The approach to Chagas disease has changed substantially
benznidazole with cutaneous and neurological reactions. over the years, alongside the concept of integral health
With both drugs, adults have almost twice the frequency (encompassing promotion, prevention, care, and
of adverse reactions (55% with benznidazole and rehabilitation actions), defining health as physical, mental,
60·9% with nifurtimox) compared with children and social wellbeing. This concept has led to a shift from
(25% with benznidazole and 29·3% with nifurtimox). disease-centred care to person-centred care (figure 2).
The discontinuation rate is slightly higher for nifurtimox The identification of asymptomatic people in the latent
in children (4% with benznidazole and 7·4% with period of infection is one of the great challenges related
2022
Chagas disease globalisation 2011 Paediatric formulations of benznidazole
• Migration as a social determinant of health 2011 PCR to substitute haemoculture and xenodiagnosis
• Chronic cases and urban disease 2011 International reference sera (Tc I and Tc II)
Ageing population with Chagas disease 2009 6 DTUs (Tc I–TcVI) and TCBat
• Increased access to health care 2009 FINDECHAGAS consolidating social movements
International security 2006 Sequencing of the whole genome of Trypanosoma cruzi
challenges, climate Interdisciplinary strategies
(CL Brener)
change, and increased • IEC, SBCC, community engagement, and intersectionality
2002 Intergovernmental Initiatives of the Amazonian Countries
global migration PHC as priority and person centred care—comprehensive care
• Chagas disease in urban contexts and high-risk groups
• Treatment not only aimed at cure, but also to reduce morbidity
Increase of oral transmission in the Amazon
• Climate change and vector dispersal
One Health approach
2001
Chronic cases and urban disease 1990s Cooperation between PAHO and national governments
• Sedentary lifestyle—associated comorbidities on strategies, mainly related to vector control
• Migration from Latin America to USA (INCOSUR, IPCAM, and IPA)
Treatment only for acute and early cases aimed at cure 1987 First social movement on Chagas disease in Pernambuco,
• First report on drug susceptibility T cruzi strains Brazil
Immunosuppression 1986 Importance of zymodemes for the identification of strains
conditions and Chagas disease reactivation in HIV co-infection
of T cruzi
regional migratio Transmission from transplantation 1985 First heart transplantation, reducing immunosuppression
1980s HIV epidemic and Chagas disease co-infection
1975 Echocardiogram
1975 Conventional serology
1973 Holter
1972 Development of benznidazole
1970s Chagas disease as a contraindication to heart transplantation
1970
Urbanisation of Chagas disease 1970s Start of intergovernmental initiatives
Illness-centred care 1968 Development of nifurtimox
Industrialisation and Accidental transmission 1949 Identification of vertical transmission
internal migration Chronic cases 1940s Start of vector control activities
• Mainly CHD 1940s Identification of blood transmission
• Megaoesophagus recognised as Chagas disease
• Distancing in the doctor–patient relationship
1940
Predominantly rural disease 1935 Romaña sign
• Focus on vector-borne transmission 1926 Anatomical–clinical stages (Salvador Mazza128)
Initial discoveries • First epidemiological evidences (serology and 12-lead ECG) 1922 Description of the cardiac form (Chagas and Villela128)
• Chest x-ray: cardiomegaly 1914 Xenodiagnosis
Acute cases focus 1913 Serological diagnosis–complement fixation
• Children affected in large numbers (Guerreiro-Machado128)
1909
Discovery of Chagas disease (Carlos Chagas)
Figure 2: Timeline Chagas disease: epidemiological, clinical, and public policy changes
CHD=Chagas heart disease. DTUs=discrete typing units. ECG=electrocardiogram. FINDECHAGAS=International Federation of Associations of People Affected by
Chagas Disease. IEC=information, education, and communication. INCOSUR=Initiative of the Southern Cone Countries. IPA=Initiative of the Andean Countries.
IPCAM=Initiative of the Central American Countries and Mexico. MCH=mother and children health. PAHO=Pan American Health Organization. PHC=primary health
care. SBCC=social and behaviour change communication.
There are specific scientific knowledge gaps that can hypothetically mean a lower probability of clinical
be identified when it comes to Chagas disease, which progression.131,132
are outlined below. First, the absence of a short-term Second is the scarcity of studies specific to Chagas
biomarker capable of assessing the therapeutic heart disease that evaluate the effectiveness and security
response. Potential serological negativity might take up of symptomatic treatment. The risk of concomitant
to two decades in the chronic phase, which is unfeasible bradyarrythmia and tachyarrhythmia in the same
for clinical studies. PCR, which has been used as a individual, the high risk of sudden death even in early
surrogate endpoint, might not be adequate as the stages of the disease, and the high number of cardio
absence of sustained parasitological clearance for embolic events even using prophylaxis strategies
12–24 months does not necessarily mean the absence of recommended for other heart diseases make Chagas
clinical benefit. It is postulated that the reduction of heart disease a distinct pathophysiological model,
parasitaemia, maintained at a low steady state, could with hard clinical management. The ongoing
ACEIs=angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. ARBs=angiotensin receptor blockers. CHW=community health worker. IEC=information, education, and communication. MCH=maternal and child health.
PHC=primary health care. QoL=quality of life. *Target population: people in conditions of risk or vulnerability; objectives: prevent transmission. †Target population: chronic Chagas disease (indeterminate form)
and acute Chagas disease (including congenital); objectives: early diagnosis aiming at cure or prevention of progression to symptomatic forms. ‡Target population: early cardiac and digestive forms; objectives:
minimise morbidity and decrease mortality; prevent or improve disabilities; ensure quality of life and promote rehabilitation. §Target population: late cardiac and digestive forms; older infected people with
comorbidities; objectives: prevent overmedicalisation; ensure comfort and quality of life; prevent complications and promote rehabilitation. ¶Actions. ||Involved sectors.
19 Pérez-Molina JA, Molina I. Chagas disease. Lancet 2018; 391: 82–94. 40 Rabinovich JE, Wisnivesky-Colli C, Solarz ND, Gürtler RE.
20 Zingales B, Miles MA, Campbell DA, et al. The revised Probability of transmission of Chagas disease by Triatoma infestans
Trypanosoma cruzi subspecific nomenclature: rationale, (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) in an endemic area of Santiago del Estero,
epidemiological relevance and research applications. Argentina. Bull World Health Organ 1990; 68: 737–46.
Infect Genet Evol 2012; 12: 240–53. 41 Silveira AC, Dias JCP. O controle da transmissão vetorial.
21 Velásquez-Ortiz N, Herrera G, Hernández C, Muñoz M, Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2011; 44 (suppl 2): 52–63.
Ramírez JD. Discrete typing units of Trypanosoma cruzi: 42 Ostermayer AL, Passos ADC, Silveira AC, Ferreira AW, Macedo V,
Geographical and biological distribution in the Americas. Sci Data Prata AR. [The national survey of seroprevalence for evaluation of
2022; 9: 360. the control of Chagas disease in Brazil (2001-2008)].
22 Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde. OPAS: 70% das pessoas Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2011; 44 (suppl 2): 108–21 (in Portuguese).
com Chagas não sabem que estão infectadas. Apr 13, 2021. https:// 43 Wendel S, Dias JCP. Transfusion transmitted Chagas disease.
www.paho.org/pt/noticias/13-4-2021-opas-70-das-pessoas-com- In: Wendel S, Brener Z, Camargo ME, Rassi A, eds. Chagas disease
chagas-nao-sabem-que-estao-infectadas (accessed Aug 18, 2023). (American trypanosomiasis), its impact on tranfusion and clinical
23 WHO. Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis). 2016. https:// medicine. São Paulo: Sociedade Brasileira de Hematologia e
www.who.int/health-topics/chagas-disease#tab=tab_1 Hemoterapia, 1992: 103–33.
(accessed Aug 18, 2023). 44 Luquetti AO, Schmuñis GA. Diagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi
24 Pan American Health Organization. EMTCT Plus framework for infection. In: Telleria J, Tibayrenc M, eds. American
elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV, syphilis, trypanosomiasis Chagas disease one hundred years of research
hepatitis B, and Chagas. Sept 11, 2017. https://iris.paho.org/ (Second edn). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2017: 687–730.
handle/10665.2/34306 (accessed Aug 18, 2023). 45 Antinori S, Galimberti L, Bianco R, Grande R, Galli M,
25 WHO. Chagas disease in Latin America: an epidemiological Corbellino M. Chagas disease in Europe: a review for the internist
update based on 2010 estimates. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2015; in the globalized world. Eur J Intern Med 2017; 43: 6–15.
90: 33–43. 46 Crowder LA, Wendel S, Bloch EM, et al. International survey of
26 Schmunis GA, Yadon ZE. Chagas disease: a Latin American health strategies to mitigate transfusion-transmitted Trypanosoma cruzi in
problem becoming a world health problem. Acta Trop 2010; non-endemic countries, 2016-2018. Vox Sang 2022; 117: 58–63.
115: 14–21. 47 Requena-Méndez A, Albajar-Viñas P, Angheben A, Chiodini P,
27 Guhl F, Ramírez JD. Poverty, migration, and Chagas disease. Gascón J, Muñoz J. Health policies to control Chagas disease
Curr Trop Med Rep 2021; 8: 52–58. transmission in European countries. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2014;
28 Guggenbühl Noller JM, Froeschl G, Eisermann P, et al. Describing 8: e3245.
nearly two decades of Chagas disease in Germany and the lessons 48 La Hoz RM. Transplantation for Chagas’ disease: closing the
learned: a retrospective study on screening, detection, diagnosis, knowledge gap. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2022; 35: 397–403.
and treatment of Trypanosoma cruzi infection from 2000 - 2018. 49 Chagas’ Disease Argentine Collaborative Transplant Consortium,
BMC Infect Dis 2020; 20: 919. Casadei D. Chagas’ disease and solid organ transplantation.
29 WHO. Ending the neglect to attain the sustainable development Transplant Proc 2010; 42: 3354–59.
goals. One health: approach for action against neglected tropical 50 Clemente WT, Pierrotti LC, Abdala E, et al. Recommendations for
diseases 2021-2030. Jan 28, 2022. https://www.who.int/ management of endemic diseases and travel medicine in solid-
publications/i/item/9789240042414 (accessed Aug 18, 2023). organ transplant recipients and donors: Latin America.
30 de Arias AR, Monroy C, Guhl F, Sosa-Estani S, Santos WS, Transplantation 2018; 102: 193–208.
Abad-Franch F. Chagas disease control-surveillance in the 51 Chin-Hong PV, Schwartz BS, Bern C, et al. Screening and
Americas: the multinational initiatives and the practical treatment of Chagas disease in organ transplant recipients in the
impossibility of interrupting vector-borne Trypanosoma cruzi United States: recommendations from the Chagas in transplant
transmission. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2022; 117: e210130. working group. Am J Transplant 2011; 11: 672–80.
31 Flores-Ferrer A, Marcou O, Waleckx E, Dumonteil E, Gourbière S. 52 Pierrotti LC, Carvalho NB, Amorin JP, Pascual J, Kotton CN,
Evolutionary ecology of Chagas disease; what do we know and what López-Vélez R. Chagas disease recommendations for solid-organ
do we need? Evol Appl 2017; 11: 470–87. transplant recipients and donors. Transplantation 2018;
32 de Souza RdCM, Gorla DE, Chame M, Jaramillo N, Monroy C, 102 (suppl 2): S1–7.
Diotaiuti L. Chagas disease in the context of the 2030 agenda: 53 Pinazo MJ, Miranda B, Rodríguez-Villar C, et al. Recommendations
global warming and vectors. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2022; for management of Chagas disease in organ and hematopoietic
117: e200479. tissue transplantation programs in nonendemic areas.
33 WHO. Global vector control response 2017–2030. 2017. https:// Transplant Rev 2011; 25: 91–101.
https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/259205 54 Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Enfermedad de Chagas
/9789241512978-eng.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed Aug 18, 2023). decálogo para prevenir trasplante de órganos transmitida por la
34 Hernández C, Salazar C, Brochero H, et al. Untangling the transmisión. Feb 3, 2021. https://www.paho.org/es/documentos/
transmission dynamics of primary and secondary vectors of enfermedad-chagas-transmitida-por-trasplante-organos-decalogo-
Trypanosoma cruzi in Colombia: parasite infection, feeding sources para-prevenir-transmision (accessed Aug 18, 2023).
and discrete typing units. Parasit Vectors 2016; 9: 620. 55 Jansen AM, Xavier SCdC, Roque ALR. Trypanosoma cruzi
35 Howard EJ, Xiong X, Carlier Y, Sosa-Estani S, Buekens P. Frequency transmission in the wild and its most important reservoir hosts in
of the congenital transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi: a systematic Brazil. Parasit Vectors 2018; 11: 502.
review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2014; 121: 22–33. 56 Pereira KS, Schmidt FL, Guaraldo AMA, Franco RMB, Dias VL,
36 Abras A, Ballart C, Fernández-Arévalo A, et al. Worldwide control Passos LAC. Chagas’ disease as a foodborne illness. J Food Prot
and management of Chagas Disease in a new era of globalization: 2009; 72: 441–46.
a close look at congenital Trypanosoma cruzi infection. 57 Messenger LA, Miles MA, Bern C. Between a bug and a hard
Clin Microbiol Rev 2022; 35: e0015221. place: Trypanosoma cruzi genetic diversity and the clinical
37 Messenger LA, Bern C. Congenital Chagas disease: current outcomes of Chagas disease. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2015;
diagnostics, limitations and future perspectives. Curr Opin Infect Dis 13: 995–1029.
2018; 31: 415–21. 58 Sánchez Negrette O, Mora MC, Basombrío MÁ. High prevalence of
38 Picado A, Cruz I, Redard-Jacot M, et al. The burden of congenital congenital Trypanosoma cruzi infection and family clustering in
Chagas disease and implementation of molecular diagnostic tools Salta, Argentina. Pediatrics 2005; 115: e668–72.
in Latin America. BMJ Glob Health 2018; 3: e001069. 59 Pan American Health Organization. Guidelines for the diagnosis
39 Carlier Y, Altcheh J, Angheben A, et al. Congenital Chagas disease: and treatment of Chagas disease. 2019. https://iris.paho.org/
updated recommendations for prevention, diagnosis, treatment, bitstream/handle/10665.2/49653/9789275120439_eng.pdf
and follow-up of newborns and siblings, girls, women of (accessed Aug 18, 2023).
childbearing age, and pregnant women. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2019
Oct; 13: e0007694.
60 Matthews S, Tannis A, Puchner KP, et al. Estimation of the 82 Sosa-Estani S, Gamboa-León MR, Del Cid-Lemus J, et al. Use of a
morbidity and mortality of congenital Chagas disease: rapid test on umbilical cord blood to screen for Trypanosoma cruzi
a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2022; infection in pregnant women in Argentina, Bolivia, Honduras, and
16: e0010376. Mexico. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2008; 79: 755–59.
61 Altcheh J, Castro L, Dib JC, et al. Prospective, historically controlled 83 Sánchez-Camargo CL, Albajar-Viñas P, Wilkins PP, et al.
study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new paediatric Comparative evaluation of 11 commercialized rapid diagnostic tests
formulation of nifurtimox in children aged 0 to 17 years with Chagas for detecting Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies in serum banks in areas
disease one year after treatment (CHICO). PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2021; of endemicity and nonendemicity. J Clin Microbiol 2014;
15: e0008912. 52: 2506–12.
62 Monge-Maillo B, López-Vélez R. Challenges in the management of 84 Marin Neto JA, Rassi A Jr, Moraes Oliveira GM, et al. SBC
Chagas disease in Latin-American migrants in Europe. guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with
Clin Microbiol Infect 2017; 23: 290–95. cardiomyopathy of Chagas disease - 2023. Arq Bras Cardiol 2023;
63 Basile L, Ciruela P, Requena-Méndez A, et al. Epidemiology of 120: e20230269.
congenital Chagas disease 6 years after implementation of a public 85 Biolo A, Ribeiro AL, Clausell N. Chagas cardiomyopathy–where do
health surveillance system, Catalonia, 2010 to 2015. Euro Surveill we stand after a hundred years? Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2010;
2019; 24: 1–16. 52: 300–16.
64 Brener Z. Laboratory-acquired Chagas’ disease: an endemic disease 86 Xavier IGG, Vieira MC, Rodrigues LF, et al. Prevalence of metabolic
among parasitologists? In: Morel C M, ed. Genes and antigens of syndrome and associated factors among patients with chronic
parasites: a laboratory manual. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Fundação Chagas disease. PLoS One 2021; 16: e0249116.
Oswaldo Cruz, 1984: 3–9. 87 Alves RM, Thomaz RP, Almeida EA, Wanderley JS, Guariento ME.
65 Pan American Health Organization. Chronic care for neglected Chagas’ disease and ageing: the coexistence of other chronic
infectious diseases: leprosy/Hansen’s disease, lymphatic filariasis, diseases with Chagas’ disease in elderly patients.
trachoma, and Chagas disease. March 1, 2021. https://iris.paho.org/ Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2009; 42: 622–28.
handle/10665.2/53312 (accessed Aug 18, 2023). 88 Vizzoni AG, Varela MC, Sangenis LHC, Hasslocher-Moreno AM,
66 Echeverría LE, Marcus R, Novick G, et al. WHF IASC roadmap on do Brasil PEAA, Saraiva RM. Ageing with Chagas disease:
Chagas disease. Glob Heart 2020; 15: 26. an overview of an urban Brazilian cohort in Rio de Janeiro.
67 Chao C, Leone JL, Vigliano CA. Chagas disease: historic Parasit Vectors 2018; 11: 354.
perspective. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 2020; 89 Moll-Bernardes RJ, Saraiva RM, Oliveira RS, et al. Case report:
1866: 165689. malignant ventricular arrhythmias mimicking acute coronary
68 Pereira Dias J, Bastos C, Araújo E, et al. Acute Chagas disease syndrome in Chagas disease. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020;
outbreak associated with oral transmission. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 102: 797–99.
2008; 41: 296–300. 90 Nunes MCP, Beaton A, Acquatella H, et al. Chagas cardiomyopathy:
69 Shikanai-Yasuda MA, Carvalho NB. Oral transmission of Chagas an update of current clinical knowledge and management:
disease. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 54: 845–52. a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.
70 Prata A. Clinical and epidemiological aspects of Chagas disease. Circulation 2018; 138: e169–209.
Lancet Infect Dis 2001; 1: 92–100. 91 Torres RM, Correia D, Nunes MdCP et al. Prognosis of chronic
71 Shikanai-Yasuda MA, Mediano MFF, Novaes CTG, et al. Clinical Chagas heart disease and other pending clinical challenges.
profile and mortality in patients with T. cruzi/HIV co-infection from Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2022; 117: e210172.
the multicenter data base of the “Network for healthcare and study of 92 Dias JCP, Ramos AN Jr, Gontijo ED, et al. 2 nd Brazilian Consensus
Trypanosoma cruzi/HIV co-infection and other immunosuppression on Chagas Disease, 2015. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2016;
conditions”. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2021; 15: e0009809. 49 (suppl 1): 3–60.
72 Almeida EA, Ramos Júnior AN, Correia D, Shikanai-Yasuda MA. 93 Keegan R, Yeung C, Baranchuk A. Sudden cardiac death risk
Co-infection Trypanosoma cruzi/HIV: systematic review (1980–2010). stratification and prevention in Chagas disease: a non-systematic
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2011; 44: 762–70. review of the literature. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev 2020;
73 Gray EB, La Hoz RM, Green JS, et al. Reactivation of Chagas 9: 175–81.
disease among heart transplant recipients in the United States, 94 Oliveira JA, Gharib AZGE, Dantas RO. Symptoms associated with
2012–2016. Transpl Infect Dis 2018; 20: e12996. different degrees of megaesophagus in Chagas disease.
74 Torres KCL, Rezende VB, Lima-Silva ML, et al. Immune senescence Arq Gastroenterol 2021; 58: 491–94.
and biomarkers profile of Bambuí aged population-based cohort. 95 Rocha A, Almeida HdO, Esper FE, Moraes DM. Associação entre
Exp Gerontol 2018; 103: 47–56. megaesôfago e carcinoma de esôfago. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 1983;
75 Colato RP, Brazão V, Santello FH, et al. Ageing is not associated 16: 94–97.
with an altered immune response during Trypanosoma cruzi 96 Luquetti AO, Schijman AG. Diagnosis of Chagas disease. In:
infection: ageing and Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Exp Gerontol Altcheh JM, Freilij H, eds. Chagas disease. Switzerland: Springer,
2017; 90: 43–51. Cham, 2019: 141–58.
76 Salvador F, Sánchez-Montalvá A, Valerio L, et al. 97 Luquetti AO, Tavares SB, Siriano LR, et al. Congenital transmission
Immunosuppression and Chagas disease; experience from a non- of Trypanosoma cruzi in central Brazil. A study of 1,211 individuals
endemic country. Clin Microbiol Infect 2015; 21: 854–60. born to infected mothers. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2015;
77 Ringer A, Ruffino JP, Leiva R, et al. Chagas disease reactivation in 110: 369–76.
rheumatologic patients: association with immunosuppressive 98 Benatar AF, Danesi E, Besuschio SA, et al. Prospective multicenter
therapy and humoral response. Clin Rheumatol 2021; 40: 2955–63. evaluation of real time PCR kit prototype for early diagnosis of
78 Edwards MS, Montgomery SP. Chagas disease: implementation of congenital Chagas disease. EBioMedicine 2021; 69: 103450.
screening to benefit mother and infant. Clin Perinatol 2021; 99 Guiang KMU, Cantey P, Montgomery SP, et al. Reactivation of
48: 331–42. Chagas disease in a bone marrow transplant patient: case report
79 Hasslocher-Moreno AM, Xavier SS, Saraiva RM, de Sousa AS. and review of screening and management. Transpl Infect Dis 2013;
Indeterminate form of Chagas disease: historical, conceptual, 15: E264–67.
clinical, and prognostic aspects. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2021; 100 Radisic MV, Repetto SA. American trypanosomiasis (Chagas disease)
54: e02542021. in solid organ transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis 2020; 22: e13429.
80 Chadalawada S, Sillau S, Archuleta S, et al. Risk of chronic 101 Rivero R, Bisio M, Velázquez EB, et al. Rapid detection of
cardiomyopathy among patients with the acute phase or Trypanosoma cruzi by colorimetric loop-mediated isothermal
indeterminate form of Chagas disease: a systematic review and amplification (LAMP): a potential novel tool for the detection of
meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3: e2015072. congenital Chagas infection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2017;
81 Ramos Júnior AN. Inclusão da reativação da doença de Chagas 89: 26–28.
como uma condição definidora de AIDS para fins de vigilância 102 Schijman AG. Molecular diagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi. Acta Trop
epidemiológica no Brasil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2004; 37: 192–93. 2018; 184: 59–66.
103 Moreira MdCV, Renan Cunha-Melo J. Chagas disease infection 122 Cafferata ML, Toscani MA, Althabe F, et al. Short-course
reactivation after heart transplant. Trop Med Infect Dis 2020; 5: 106. benznidazole treatment to reduce Trypanosoma cruzi parasitic load in
104 Zeledón R, Dias JC, Brilla-Salazar A, de Rezende JM, Vargas LG, women of reproductive age (BETTY): a non-inferiority randomized
Urbina A. Does a spontaneous cure for Chagas’ disease exist? controlled trial study protocol. Reprod Health 2020; 17: 128.
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 1988; 21: 15–20. 123 Sousa AS, Vermeij D, Parra-Henao G, et al. The CUIDA Chagas
105 Rassi A Jr, Luquetti AO, Tavares SBN, et al. Ausência de cura Project: towards the elimination of congenital transmission of
espontânea na doença de Chagas em 110 casos sem tratamento Chagas disease in Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, and Paraguay.
específico, com seguimento de 11 a 15 anos. 72o Congresso Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2022; 55: e01712022.
Brasileiro de Cardiologia; Nov 3–Nov 5, 2017 (abstr). 124 Sánchez-Valdéz FJ, Padilla A, Wang W, Orr D, Tarleton RL.
106 WHO. Control of Chagas disease: second report of the WHO expert Spontaneous dormancy protects Trypanosoma cruzi during extended
committee. 2002. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/42443? drug exposure. Elife 2018; 7: e34039.
show=full (accessed Aug 18, 2023). 125 Berenstein AJ, Falk N, Moscatelli G, et al. Adverse events associated
107 Luquetti AO, Ponce C, Ponce E, et al. Chagas’ disease diagnosis: with nifurtimox treatment for Chagas disease in children and
a multicentric evaluation of Chagas Stat-Pak, a rapid adults. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2021; 65: e01135–20.
immunochromatographic assay with recombinant proteins of 126 Kratz JM, Garcia Bournissen F, Forsyth CJ, Sosa-Estani S. Clinical
Trypanosoma cruzi. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2003; 46: 265–71. and pharmacological profile of benznidazole for treatment of
108 Moscatelli G, Moroni S, García Bournissen F, et al. Longitudinal Chagas disease. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2018; 11: 943–57.
follow up of serological response in children treated for Chagas 127 Ruiz-Lancheros E, Rasoolizadeh A, Chatelain E, et al. Validation of
disease. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2019; 13: e0007668. apolipoprotein a-1 and fibronectin fragments as markers of
109 de Andrade AL, Zicker F, de Oliveira RM, et al. Randomised trial of parasitological cure for congenital Chagas disease in children
efficacy of benznidazole in treatment of early Trypanosoma cruzi treated with benznidazole. Open Forum Infect Dis 2018; 5: ofy236.
infection. Lancet 1996; 348: 1407–13. 128 Prata A. Evolution of the clinical and epidemiological knowledge
110 Sguassero Y, Roberts KN, Harvey GB, et al. Course of serological about Chagas disease 90 years after its discovery. Mem Inst Oswaldo
tests in treated subjects with chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection: a Cruz 1999; 94 (suppl 1): 81–88.
systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. 129 WHO. Ending the neglect to attain the Sustainable Development
Int J Infect Dis 2018; 73: 93–101. Goals: a road map for neglected tropical diseases 2021–2030.
111 Pinto AY, Valente VC, Coura JR, et al. Clinical follow-up of Jan 28, 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/
responses to treatment with benznidazol in Amazon: a cohort study item/9789240010352 (accessed Aug 18, 2023).
of acute Chagas disease. PLoS One 2013; 8: e64450. 130 Morel CM, Acharya T, Broun D, et al. Health innovation networks
112 Altcheh J. Randomized trial of benznidazole for chronic Chagas’ to help developing countries address neglected diseases. Science
cardiomyopathy. Arch Argent Pediatr 2016; 114: e124–25. 2005; 309: 401–04.
113 Villar JC, Herrera VM, Carreño JGP, et al. Nifurtimox versus 131 De Lana M, Martins-Filho OA. Revisiting the posttherapeutic cure
benznidazole or placebo for asymptomatic Trypanosoma cruzi criterion in Chagas disease: time for new methods, more questions,
infection (Equivalence of Usual Interventions for Trypanosomiasis - doubts, and polemics or time to change old concepts?
EQUITY): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials BioMed Res Int 2015; 2015: 652985.
2019; 20: 431. 132 Murphy N, Cardinal MV, Bhattacharyya T, et al. Assessing antibody
114 Alonso-Vega C, Urbina JA, Sanz S, et al. New chemotherapy decline after chemotherapy of early chronic Chagas disease
regimens and biomarkers for Chagas disease: the rationale and patients. Parasit Vectors 2021; 14: 543.
design of the TESEO study, an open-label, randomised, prospective, 133 Cortes-Serra N, Losada-Galvan I, Pinazo MJ, Fernandez-Becerra C,
phase-2 clinical trial in the Plurinational State of Bolivia. BMJ Open Gascon J, Alonso-Padilla J. State-of-the-art in host-derived
2021; 11: e052897. biomarkers of Chagas disease prognosis and early evaluation of
115 Yun O, Lima MA, Ellman T, et al. Feasibility, drug safety, and anti-Trypanosoma cruzi treatment response.
effectiveness of etiological treatment programs for Chagas disease Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 2020; 1866: 165758.
in Honduras, Guatemala, and Bolivia: 10-year experience of 134 García-Huertas P, Cardona-Castro N. Advances in the treatment of
Médecins Sans Frontières. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2009; 3: e488. Chagas disease: promising new drugs, plants and targets.
116 Simón M, Iborra MA, Carrilero B, Segovia M. What is the role of Biomed Pharmacother 2021; 142: 112020.
real time PCR in the follow up of patients with chronic Chagas’ 135 Bivona AE, Alberti AS, Cerny N, Trinitario SN, Malchiodi EL.
disease? Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2020; 38: 353–55. Chagas disease vaccine design: the search for an efficient
117 Molina I, Gómez i Prat J, Salvador F, et al. Randomized trial of Trypanosoma cruzi immune-mediated control.
posaconazole and benznidazole for chronic Chagas’ disease. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 2020; 1866: 165658.
N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1899–908. 136 Avaria A, Ventura-Garcia L, Sanmartino M, Van der Laat C.
118 Morillo CA, Waskin H, Sosa-Estani S, et al. Benznidazole and Population movements, borders, and Chagas disease.
posaconazole in eliminating parasites in asymptomatic T. cruzi Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2022; 117: e210151.
carriers: the STOP-CHAGAS trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 137 Carbajal-de-la-Fuente AL, Yadón ZE. A scientometric evaluation of
69: 939–47. the Chagas disease implementation research programme of the
119 Torrico F, Gascón J, Barreira F, et al. New regimens of benznidazole PAHO and TDR. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2013; 7: e2445.
monotherapy and in combination with fosravuconazole for 138 Pinheiro E, Brum-Soares L, Reis R, Cubides JC. Chagas disease:
treatment of Chagas disease (BENDITA): a phase 2, double-blind, review of needs, neglect, and obstacles to treatment access in
randomised trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2021; 21: 1129–40. Latin America. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2017; 50: 296–300.
120 Urbina JA. The long road towards a safe and effective treatment of
chronic Chagas disease. Lancet Infect Dis 2018; 18: 363–65. Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
121 Molina-Morant D, Fernández ML, Bosch-Nicolau P, et al. Efficacy
and safety assessment of different dosage of benznidazol for the
treatment of Chagas disease in chronic phase in adults
(MULTIBENZ study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized
phase II non-inferiority clinical trial. Trials 2020; 21: 328.