Chapter 5 IFA NEW
Chapter 5 IFA NEW
Chapter 5 IFA NEW
A. Cost of Land
Because land is a non-depreciable asset except some exceptional cases, costs assigned to it
should be those costs that directly relate to land’s unlimited life. Together with clearing and
grading costs, costs of removing unwanted structures from newly acquired land are considered
part of the cost to prepare the land for its intended use and are added to its purchase price.
Government assessments for water lines, sewers, roads, and other such items are considered part
of the land’s cost because maintenance of these items is the responsibility of the government;
thus, to the landowner, they have unlimited life. These types of improvements are distinguished
from similar costs for landscaping, parking lots, and interior sidewalks that are installed by the
owner and must be replaced over time. The improvements that owners are responsible for are
generally classified as land improvements and depreciated. Generally, land is accounted as non-
depreciable assets.
Example, Suppose Smart Touch needs property and purchases land for $50,000 with a note
payable for the same amount on August 1, 2011. Smart Touch also pays cash as follows:
$4,000 in property taxes in arrears, $2,000 in transfer taxes, $5,000 to remove an old
building, and a $1,000 survey fee. What is the company’s cost of this land?
Purchase price of land ………………………………….$50,000
Add related costs:
Property taxes in arrears……………. $4,000
Transfer taxes…………………………… 2,000
Removal of building …………………….5,000
Survey fee………………………………….1, 000 12,000
Total cost of land………………………………… $62,000
The entry to record the purchase of the land on August 1, 2011, follows:
Land ……………….62, 000
Notes payable……………. 50,000
Cash ……………………….12, 000
Suppose Smart Touch then pays $20,000 for fences, paving, lighting, landscaping, and signs on
February 15, 2012. The following entry records the cost of these land improvements:
Land Improvements………… 20,000
Cash …………………………..20,000
Land and land improvements are two entirely separate assets. Recall that land is not
depreciated. However, the cost of land improvements is depreciated over that asset’s useful
life.
B. Cost of Buildings.
The cost of buildings should include all expenditures related directly to their acquisition or
construction. These costs include (1) materials, labor, and overhead costs incurred during
construction, and (2) professional fees and building permits. Generally, companies contract
others to construct their buildings. Companies consider all costs incurred, from excavation to
completion, as part of the building costs. But how should companies account for an old building
that is on the site of a newly proposed building? Is the cost of removal of the old building a cost
of the land or a cost of the new building? Recall that if a company purchases land with an old
building on it, then the cost of demolition less its salvage value is a cost of getting the land ready
for its intended use and relates to the land rather than to the new building. In other words, all
costs of getting an asset ready for its intended use are costs of that asset.
Cost of Equipment
The term ―equipment‖ in accounting includes delivery equipment, office equipment, machinery,
furniture and fixtures, furnishings, factory equipment, and similar fixed assets. The cost of such
assets includes the purchase price, freight and handling charges incurred, insurance on the
equipment while in transit, cost of special foundations if required, assembling and installation
costs, and costs of conducting trial runs. Any proceeds from selling any items produced while
bringing the equipment to the location and condition for its intended use (such as samples
produced when testing equipment) should reduce the cost of the equipment. Costs thus include
all expenditures incurred in acquiring the equipment and preparing it for use.
Self-Constructed Assets
Occasionally, a building, machines or equipment may be constructed by a business enterprise for
its own use. Because, this method is an economic method of acquisition or the quality and
specifications of the assets may be controlled better if it’s self constructed. The cost of assets in
these situations includes,
Materials and direct labor cost and
Overhead can be handled in two ways:
1. Assign no fixed overhead. 2. Assign a portion of all overhead to the construction
process. Most Companies use the second method extensively
Companies can handle overhead in one of two ways:
1. Assign no fixed overhead to the cost of the constructed asset. The major argument for this
treatment is that overhead is generally fixed in nature. As a result, this approach assumes that the
company will have the same costs regardless of whether or not it constructs the asset. Therefore,
to charge a portion of the overhead costs to the equipment will normally reduce current expenses
and consequently overstate income of the current period. However, the company would assign to
the cost of the constructed asset variable overhead costs that increase as a result of the
construction.
2. Assign a portion of all overhead to the construction process. This approach, called a full-
costing approach, assumes that costs attach to all products and assets manufactured or
constructed. Under this approach, a company assigns a portion of all overhead to the construction
process, as it would to normal production. Advocates say that failure to allocate overhead costs
understates the initial cost of the asset and results in an inaccurate future allocation
Valuation of PP&E
Like other assets, companies should record property, plant, and equipment at the fair value of
what they give up or at the fair value of the asset received, whichever is more clearly evident.
However, the process of asset acquisition sometimes obscures fair value. For example, if a
company buys land and buildings together for one price, how does it determine separate values
for the land and buildings? We examine these types of accounting problems in the following
sections.
1. Cash Discounts
When a company purchases plant assets subject to cash discounts for prompt payment, how should it
report the discount? If it takes the discount, the company should consider the discount as a reduction in
the purchase price of the asset. But should the company reduce the asset cost even if it does not take the
discount? Two points of view exist on this question. One approach considers the discount— whether
taken or not—as a reduction in the cost of the asset. The rationale for this approach is that the real cost of
the asset is the cash or cash equivalent price of the asset. In addition, some argue that the terms of cash
discounts are so attractive that failure to take them indicates management error or inefficiency. With
respect to the second approach, its proponents argue that failure to take the discount should not always be
considered a loss. The terms may be unfavorable, or it might not be prudent for the company to take the
discount. At present, companies use both methods, though most prefer the former method.
2. Lump-Sum Purchases
Allocate the total cost among the various assets on the basis of their relative fair market values.
A company may pay a single price for several assets as a group a basket purchase for accounting,
the company must identify the cost of each asset. The total cost paid (100%) is divided among
the assets according to their relative sales or market values. This is called the relative-sales
value method.
Example: Suppose Smart Touch paid a combined purchase price of $100,000 on March 1, 2012,
for the land and building. An appraisal performed a month before the purchase indicates that the
land’s market (sales) value is $30,000 and the building’s market (sales) value is $90,000. It is
clear that Smart Touch got a good deal, paying less than fair market value, which is $120,000 for
the combined assets. But how will Smart Touch allocate the $100,000 paid for both assets?
First, figure the ratio of each asset’s market value to the total for both assets combined.
The total appraised value is $120,000.
Land market value + Building market value = Total market value
$30,000 + $90,000 = $120,000
1. The land makes up 25% of the total market value, and the building 75%, as follows:
Asset MV % of total value total purchase Cost of each
price asset
For Smart Touch, the land cost $25,000 and the building cost $75,000.
Suppose Smart Touch paid by signing a note payable (deferred payments). The entry to record
the purchase of the land and building is as follows:
Land………………………., 25,000
Building…………………… 75,000
Notes payable …………………100,000
3. Issuance of Stock
When companies acquire property by issuing securities, such as common stock, the par
or stated value of such stock fails to properly measure the property cost. If trading of the
Stock is active; the market value of the stock issued is a fair indication of the cost of the
property acquired.
For example, Upgrade Living Co. decides to purchase some land for expansion of its carpeting
and cabinet operation. In lieu of paying cash for the land, the company issues to Deed land
Company 5,000 shares of common stock (par value $10) that have a fair market value of $12 per
share. Upgrade Living Co. records the following entry.
Land (5,000 _ $12) ………….60, 000
Common Stock ……………………… 50,000
Paid-In Capital in Excess of Par ……...10,000
If the company cannot determine the market value of the common stock exchanged,
it establishes the fair value of the property. It then uses the value of the property as the
basis for recording the asset and issuance of the common stock.
B. Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets
Companies should recognize immediately any gains or losses on the exchange when the
transaction has commercial substance.
Exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows change as a result of the
transaction. That is, if the two parties’ economic positions change, the transaction has
commercial substance. Companies should not value assets at more than their cash equivalent
price; if the loss were deferred, assets would be overstated.
Illustration: Information Processing, Inc. trades its used machine for a new model at Jerrod
Business Solutions Inc. The exchange has commercial substance. The used machine has a book
value of $8,000 (original cost $12,000 less $4,000 accumulated depreciation) and a fair value of
$6,000. The new model lists for $16,000. Jerrod gives Information Processing a trade-in
allowance of $9,000 for the used machine. Information Processing computes the cost of the new
asset as follows. Information Processing records this transaction as follows:
Equipment …………………………………………13,000
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment 4,000
Loss on Disposal of Equipment …………. 2,000
Equipment ……………………………. 12,000
Cash …………………………………………………..7,000
Loss on Disposal
Exchanges—Gain Situation
Has Commercial Substance. Company usually records the cost of a nonmonetary asset
acquired in exchange for another nonmonetary asset at the fair value of the asset given up, and
immediately recognizes a gain.
Illustration: Interstate Transportation Company exchanged a number of used trucks plus cash
for a semi-truck. The used trucks have a combined book value of $42,000 (cost $64,000 less
$22,000 accumulated depreciation). Interstate’s purchasing agent, experienced in the secondhand
market, indicates that the used trucks have a fair market value of $49,000. In addition to the
trucks, Interstate must pay $11,000 cash for the semi-truck. Interstate computes the cost of the
semi-truck as follows.
Company A Company B
Cost of equipment surrendered ……………………….$100,000 …………..$60,000
Accumulated Depreciation ………………………………54,000 ……………32,000
Fair Value of equipment surrendered ……………………40,000 …………..35,000
Cash received (paid) ………………………………………5,000 …………...(5,000)
Company A Company B
Equipment ($40,000 – 5,000)….. 35,000 Equipment ($28,000 – $5,000)33,000
Accumulated Depreciation ………54,000 Accumulated Depreciation ...32,000
Loss ($40,000 – $46,000)………… 6,000 Equipment….. 60,000
Cash ……………………………5,000 Cash ………….5, 000
Equipment ……………………….100, 000
Scenario III: Exchange of similar assets: Boot Received by company incurring a Gain and
Paid by company incurring a Loss
Company A Company B
Cost of equipment surrendered ………………… $100,000 ……………….$60,000
Accumulated Depreciation …………………………80,000 ………………….32,000
Fair Value of equipment surrendered ………………30,000 ………………….27,000
Cash received (paid) …………………………………3,000 …………………..(3,000)
Company A Company B
Equipment……………… ….18,000 Equipment ($27,000 + $3,000)…30,000
Accumulated Depreciation 80,000 Accumulated Depreciation …….32, 000
Cash ……………………… 3,000 Loss ($27,000 - $28,000) …………1,000
Equipment………………… 100,000 Equipment ………………………60,000
Gain …………………………….1,000 Cash …………………………..3,000
Equipment = ($20,000 – 3,000 + 1,000) = 18,000
Gain = Boot × (FV – BV) of asset surrendered
Boot + FV of asset acquired
= $3,000 × ($30,000 - $20,000) = $1,000
$3,000 + $27,000
5.2 Deprecation, impairments and revaluation
Over time, fixed assets, with the exception of land, lose their ability to provide services. Thus,
the costs of fixed assets such as equipment and buildings should be recorded as an expense over
their useful lives. This periodic recording of the cost of fixed assets as an expense is called
depreciation. Because, land has an unlimited life, it is not depreciated except some
circumstances. Depreciation is not a process of valuation. Businesses do not record depreciation
based on changes in the asset’s market (sales) value. Depreciation is recapturing the cost
invested in the asset. Depreciation does not mean that the business sets aside cash to replace an
asset when it is used up. Depreciation has nothing to do with cash.
Depreciation of a plant asset is based on three main factors: These are
a) Initial cost b) Useful (service life) c) Residual value
a) Initial cost: It includes all expenditures necessary to get the asset in place and ready for use.
b) Expected useful life: It is the length of service the business expects from the asset. It may be
expressed in years, units of output, miles or other measures. For example the useful life of the
building is stated in years. The useful life of a bookbinding machine may be stated as a number
of books the machine is expected to bind that is its expected output. A reasonable measure of a
delivery trucks useful life is the total number of miles the truck is expected to travel. Companies
base such estimates on past experience and information from industry trade magazines and
government publication.
C) Estimated residual value: is also called scrap value, salvage value, or trade in value. It is the
expected cash value of the asset at the end of its useful life. In other words it is the part of the
asset’s cost that the company expects to be returned at the end of assets useful life.
Note:-
a. In computing depreciation, residual value is not depreciated because the business
expects to receive this amount from disposal of asset.
b. The full cost of plant asset is depreciated if the asset expected to have no residual value.
c. Depreciable cost-It is a cost that will be spread over the assets useful life as
depreciationexpense.
Depreciable cost =plant asset cost – residual value
We assume that all assets placed in or taken out of service during the first half of a month is
treated as if the event occurred on the first day of that month. Likewise, all fixed asset additions
and deductions during the second half of a month are treated as if the event occurred on the first
day of the next month.
Depreciation methods
Four basic methods exist for computing depreciation; a) Straight Line , b) Units of depreciation
, c) Declining balance method,
1) Straight-Line Method
Under this method, depreciation is the same for each year of the assets useful life .It is measured
solely by the passage of time .In order to compute depreciation expense; it is necessarily to
determine depreciable cost. Depreciable cost is then divided by the assets useful life to determine
depreciation expense.
Example: The computations in this section use information about a machine that inspects
athletic shoes before packaging. Manufacturers such as Converse, Reebok, Adidas, and Fila use
this machine. Data for this machine are
If this machine is purchased on December 31, 2010, and used throughout its predicted useful life
of five years, the straight-line method allocates an equal amount of depreciation to each of the
years 2011 through 2015. We make the following adjusting entry at the end of each of the five
years to record straight-line depreciation of this machine.
The $1,800 Depreciation Expense is reported on the income statement among operating
expenses. The $1,800 Accumulated Depreciation is a contra asset account to the Machinery
account in the balance sheet
We also can compute the straight-line depreciation rate, defined as 100% divided by the number
of periods in the asset’s useful life. For the inspection machine, this rate is 20% (100% /5, or 1/5
per period). We use this rate, along with other information, to compute the machine’s straight-
line depreciation
2. Units-of-Production Method
The straight-line method charges an equal share of an asset’s cost to each period. If plant assets
are used up in about equal amounts each accounting period, this method produces a reasonable
matching of expenses with revenues. However, the use of some plant assets varies greatly from
one period to the next. A builder, for instance, might use a piece of construction equipment for a
month and then not use it again for several months. When equipment use varies from period to
period, the units- of-production depreciation method can better match expenses with revenues.
Units-of production depreciation charges a varying amount to expense for each period of an
asset’s useful life depending on its usage.
An accelerated depreciation method yields larger depreciation expenses in the early years of an
asset’s life and less depreciation in later years. The most common accelerated method is the
declining-balance method of depreciation, which uses a depreciation rate that is a multiple of the
straight-line rate and applies it to the asset’s beginning-of-period book value. The amount of
depreciation declines each period because book value declines each period. A common
depreciation rate for the declining-balance method is double the straight-line rate. This is called
the double-declining-balance (DDB) method. This method is applied in three steps: (1) compute
the asset’s straight-line depreciation rate, (2) double the straight-line rate, and (3) compute
depreciation expense by multiplying this rate by the asset’s beginning-of-period book value
The three-step process is to (1) divide 100% by five years to determine the straight-line rate of
20%, or 1/5, per year, (2) double this 20% rate to get the declining-balance rate of 40%, or 2/5,
per year, and (3) compute depreciation expense as 40%, or 2/5, multiplied by the beginning-of-
period book value
This $296 is not equal to 40% * $,296, or $518.40. If we had used the $518.40 for depreciation
expense in 2015, the ending book value would equal $777.60, which is less than the $1,000
salvage value. Instead, the $1,296 is computed by subtracting the $1,000 salvage value from the
$,296 book value at the beginning of the fifth year (the year when DDB depreciation cuts into
salvage value)