Flowering Pathway in Arabidopsis-Coupland

SnapShot: Control of Flowering in Arabidopsis
550 Cell 141, April 3, 2010 ©2010 Elsevier Inc.
Fabio Fornara, Amaury de Montaigu, and George Coupland

Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Köln 50829, Germany
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.024
See online version for legend and references.
SnapShot: Control of Flowering in
Arabidopsis
Plants initiate flowering after a period of vegetative development. During this process, called floral induction, the shoot apical meristem starts to produce flowers instead of
leaves. The timing of floral induction is controlled by sophisticated regulatory networks that monitor changes in the environment, ensuring that flowering occurs under conditions
most likely to maximize reproductive success and seed production. In the model plant species Arabidopsis thaliana ?180 genes have been implicated in flowering-time control
based on isolation of loss-of-function mutations or analysis of transgenic plants. This SnapShot presents a subset of these genes and proteins, each organized according to its
spatial activity in the leaves or the shoot apical meristem of the plant. Strikingly, several genes act more than once and in several tissues during floral induction. Many of these
genes occur in a network of six major pathways: the photoperiod and vernalization pathways control flowering in response to seasonal changes in day length and temperature;
the ambient temperature pathway responds to daily growth temperatures; and the age, autonomous, and gibberellin pathways act more independently of environmental stimuli.
The six pathways converge to regulate a small number of “floral integrator genes,” encoded by different classes of proteins, which govern flowering time by merging signals from
multiple pathways. These integrator genes include FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS 1 (SOC1), which both rapidly promote
floral development. In addition, responses to other environmental stimuli, such as the balance of different wavelengths of light or nutrient availability, also influence flowering
time, but how these processes interact with the pathways described here is not fully understood.
All genes that we identified from the literature as being implicated in flowering-time control are listed at http://www.mpiz-koeln.mpg.de/english/research/couplandGroup/
coupland/floweringgenes/index.html.
Vernalization and Autonomous Pathways

FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) is a MADS-box transcription factor that acts as a potent repressor of flowering. Its activity differs among varieties of Arabidopsis and is responsible
for much of the variation in flowering time observed among these plants. The vernalization pathway activates flowering by silencing FLC in response to prolonged exposure to
low temperatures. In certain varieties of Arabidopsis, cold temperatures trigger antisense transcription at the FLC locus, leading to the production of COOLAIR RNA and sub-
sequent silencing of FLC transcription. Maintenance of FLC repression, even when plants are returned to warmer temperatures, requires histone modifications at the chromatin
of the FLC locus. These modifications involve the PHD finger protein VERNALIZATION INSENSITIVE 3 (VIN3) and a POLYCOMB REPRESSIVE COMPLEX 2 (PRC2) that includes
VERNALIZATION 2 (VRN2).
Photoperiod Pathway and the Circadian Clock

Flowering of Arabidopsis is promoted by exposure to long summer days and is repressed by short winter days. The photoperiod pathway controls this response and acts in the
leaves through a signaling cascade involving GIGANTEA (GI) and the transcriptional regulator CONSTANS (CO). CO promotes flowering by initiating transcription of the FT and
TWIN SISTER OF FT (TSF) genes. During long days, light promotes the interaction between GI and a family of F-box ubiquitin ligases, such as the FLAVIN-BINDING KELCH
REPEAT F-BOX 1 (FKF1) protein. These interactions stabilize the F-box proteins, allowing them to promote the degradation of a set of transcriptional repressors of CO, includ-
ing numerous DOF transcription factors called CYCLING DOF FACTORs (CDFs). CDFs repress flowering by downregulating CO expression in leaves. At the posttranscriptional
level, CO is degraded in the dark by the ubiquitin ligase CONSTITUTIVE PHOTOMORPHOGENIC 1 (COP1) and in the morning by a pathway activated by the photoreceptor
Phytochrome B (PHYB).
These layers of transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation ensure that CO activates transcription of FT and TSF transcription only during long days. Expression and
translation of FT occur in the leaves, and the small FT protein then moves through the phloem to the meristem, where it activates the floral development program. Movement of
TSF through the phloem may also occur.
The circadian clock is a time-keeping mechanism with a periodicity of 24 hr. The circadian clock confers diurnal patterns of gene expression on ?30% of the
genes in Arabidopsis. The circadian clock comprises three interlocked feed-back loops. The central loop comprises the partially redundant transcription factors
CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) and LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY), which repress transcription of TIMING OF CAB 1 (TOC1). TOC1 encodes a pseudo-
response regulator (PPR) and activates transcription of LHY and CCA1. Similar loops occur in the morning and evening, which include PRR7/PRR9 and GI, respectively.
Many mutations that impair the circadian clock also alter flowering time. For example, the circadian clock ensures that CO transcription peaks late in the day, and GI enhances
this peak under long-day conditions. In genotypes where CO transcription shifts to earlier in the day, CO activation by light is no longer restricted to long days but also occurs
during short days, leading to earlier FT transcription and flowering under short-day conditions.
Gibberellin Pathway
Gibberellin (GA) is a growth regulator that promotes flowering in Arabidopsis. The GIBBERELLIN 20 OXIDASE (GA20ox) enzyme catalyzes several steps in the biosynthesis of GA
by oxidizing a number of precursors. Mutations that reduce this biosynthetic pathway or increase the degradation of GA delay flowering, particularly under short-day conditions.
The concentration of bioactive GA (GA4) increases at the meristem immediately prior to floral induction. This GA4 probably moves from other parts of the plant to the meristem
because mRNAs encoding GA20ox and other GA-biosynthetic enzymes do not detectably accumulate at the meristem. However, such mRNAs do increase in the stalk of the
leaves (i.e., the petiole) in response to day length, suggesting that the petioles are one site of GA biosynthesis during floral induction. The GA 2-oxidase (GA2ox) enzyme deac-
tivates GA by hydroxylating it.
Ambient Temperature Pathway

Arabidopsis plants flower earlier when grown at higher temperatures, such as 23°C, than at lower temperatures, such as 16°C. The MADS box transcription factor SHORT VEG-
ETATIVE PHASE (SVP) appears to play a crucial role in this pathway because svp mutants are insensitive to changes in ambient temperature and flower early at both tempera-
tures. SVP represses FT transcription (and thus flowering) at lower temperatures, but the levels of FT mRNA increase at higher temperatures.
Age Pathway
As the plant ages, concentrations of the SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING LIKE (SPL) transcription factors increase. SPLs promote flowering by initiating the expression of
several other transcription factors, such as LEAFY (LFY), FRUITFULL (FUL), and SOC1. SPL proteins are negatively regulated by the microRNA miR-156, whose cellular levels
are higher in younger versus older plants and progressively decrease as the plant ages.
Meristem Responses
During floral induction, the shoot apical meristem transforms from a vegetative meristem, which forms leaves, to an inflorescence meristem, which forms flowers. During this
process the meristem becomes taller and more domed. These morphological changes are associated with dramatic changes in gene expression, including increased expression
of SOC1, which encodes a MADS box transcription factor. SOC1 activation occurs rapidly when plants are shifted from short days to long days, but SOC1 responds to other
floral induction pathways as well. For example, it is activated by GA and aging but repressed by vernalization and ambient temperature pathways through direct inhibition by
FLC and SVP. Activation of SOC1 during long days requires FT and may be a direct response to the arrival of FT at the meristem from the leaf. FT initiates flower development by
interacting with the bZIP transcription factor FD and directly promoting transcription of the MADS box factor APETALA1 (AP1).
SOC1 activation leads to further changes in gene expression in the meristem as it changes shape and becomes an inflorescence meristem. These include the expression of
transcription factors, such as LEAFY (LFY), SPLs, and AGAMOUS-LIKE 24 (AGL24). In the inflorescence meristem, TFL1 (TERMINAL FLOWER 1), a PEPB-like protein (Phosphati-
dylethanolamine binding protein) that shares high sequence similarity with FT, prevents the upregulation of AP1 and LFY mRNA. This restricts AP1 and LFY expression to cells
committed to becoming floral primordia and ensures the maintenance of a pool of undifferentiated cells that sustain indeterminate growth of the inflorescence meristem.
(continued on following page)
550.e1 Cell 141, April 3, 2010 ©2010 Elsevier Inc. DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.024
SnapShot: Control of Flowering in
Arabidopsis
References
Baurle, I., and Dean, C. (2006). The timing of developmental transitions in plants. Cell 125, 655–664.
Farrona, S., Coupland, G., and Turck, F. (2008). The impact of chromatin regulation on the floral transition. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 19, 560–573.
Fornara, F., Panigrahi, K.C., Gissot, L., Sauerbrunn, N., Ruhl, M., Jarillo, J.A., and Coupland, G. (2009). Arabidopsis DOF transcription factors act redundantly to reduce CONSTANS
expression and are essential for a photoperiodic flowering response. Dev. Cell 17, 75–86.
He, Y., and Amasino, R.M. (2005). Role of chromatin modification in flowering-time control. Trends Plant Sci. 10, 30–35.
Liu, C., Xi, W., Shen, L., Tan, C., and Yu, H. (2009). Regulation of floral patterning by flowering time genes. Dev. Cell 16, 711–722.
Mathieu, J., Yant, L.J., Murdter, F., Kuttner, F., and Schmid, M. (2009). Repression of flowering by the miR172 target SMZ. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000148.
Mutasa-Gottgens, E., and Hedden, P. (2009). Gibberellin as a factor in floral regulatory networks. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 1979–1989.
Swiezewski, S., Liu, F., Magusin, A., and Dean, C. (2009). Cold-induced silencing by long antisense transcripts of an Arabidopsis Polycomb target. Nature 462, 799–802.
Turck, F., Fornara, F., and Coupland, G. (2008). Regulation and identity of florigen: FLOWERING LOCUS T moves center stage. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 573–594.
Wang, J.W., Czech, B., and Weigel, D. (2009). miR156-regulated SPL transcription factors define an endogenous flowering pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell 138, 738–749.
550.e2 Cell 141, April 3, 2010 ©2010 Elsevier Inc. DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.024

Flowering Pathway in Arabidopsis-Coupland

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Flowering Pathway in Arabidopsis-Coupland

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Flowering Pathway in Arabidopsis-Coupland

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SnapShot: Control of Flowering in Arabidopsis

550 Cell 141, April 3, 2010 ©2010 Elsevier Inc.

Fabio Fornara, Amaury de Montaigu, and George Coupland

Vernalization and Autonomous Pathways

Photoperiod Pathway and the Circadian Clock

Ambient Temperature Pathway

(continued on following page)

You might also like