Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 13 views

    How To Conduct Critical Review - 1

    Uploaded by

    Temiloluwa Abolarin
    The document provides guidance on writing a critical review, outlining its typical structure and components. It discusses that a critical review usually includes an introduction, summary, and critique section. The introduction presents the topic, aim, and a brief evaluation. The summary condenses the key points and examples into about a third of the review. The critique section provides a balanced discussion of the text's strengths, weaknesses, and notable features, supported by criteria and other sources. It concludes with a short paragraph reiterating the overall opinion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    How To Conduct Critical Review - 1

    Uploaded by

    Temiloluwa Abolarin
    13 views4 pages
    The document provides guidance on writing a critical review, outlining its typical structure and components. It discusses that a critical review usually includes an introduction, summary, and critique section. The introduction presents the topic, aim, and a brief evaluation. The summary condenses the key points and examples into about a third of the review. The critique section provides a balanced discussion of the text's strengths, weaknesses, and notable features, supported by criteria and other sources. It concludes with a short paragraph reiterating the overall opinion.

    Original Title

    How to conduct critical review_1

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides guidance on writing a critical review, outlining its typical structure and components. It discusses that a critical review usually includes an introduction, summary, and critique section. The introduction presents the topic, aim, and a brief evaluation. The summary condenses the key points and examples into about a third of the review. The critique section provides a balanced discussion of the text's strengths, weaknesses, and notable features, supported by criteria and other sources. It concludes with a short paragraph reiterating the overall opinion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    13 views4 pages

    How To Conduct Critical Review - 1

    Uploaded by

    Temiloluwa Abolarin
    The document provides guidance on writing a critical review, outlining its typical structure and components. It discusses that a critical review usually includes an introduction, summary, and critique section. The introduction presents the topic, aim, and a brief evaluation. The summary condenses the key points and examples into about a third of the review. The critique section provides a balanced discussion of the text's strengths, weaknesses, and notable features, supported by criteria and other sources. It concludes with a short paragraph reiterating the overall opinion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 4

    Structure of a Critical Review

    Critical reviews, both short (one page) and long (four pages), usually have
    a similar structure. Check your assignment instructions for formatting and
    structural specifications. Headings are usually optional for longer reviews
    and can be helpful for the reader.

    Introduction
    The length of an introduction is usually one paragraph for a journal article
    review and two or three paragraphs for a longer book review. Include a few
    opening sentences that announce the author(s) and the title, and briefly
    explain the topic of the text. Present the aim of the text and summarise the
    main finding or key argument. Conclude the introduction with a brief
    statement of your evaluation of the text. This can be a positive or negative
    evaluation or, as is usually the case, a mixed response.

    Summary
    Present a summary of the key points along with a limited number of
    examples. You can also briefly explain the author’s purpose/intentions
    throughout the text and you may briefly describe how the text is organised.
    The summary should only make up about a third of the critical review.

    Critique
    The critique should be a balanced discussion and evaluation of the
    strengths, weakness and notable features of the text. Remember to base
    your discussion on specific criteria. Good reviews also include other
    sources to support your evaluation (remember to reference).

    You can choose how to sequence your critique. Here are some examples
    to get you started:

    • Most important to least important conclusions you make about the


    text.
    • If your critique is more positive than negative, then present the
    negative points first and the positive last.
    • If your critique is more negative than positive, then present the
    positive points first and the negative last.
    • If there are both strengths and weakness for each criterion you use,
    you need to decide overall what your judgement is. For example, you
    may want to comment on a key idea in the text and have both
    positive and negative comments. You could begin by stating what is
    1
    good about the idea and then concede and explain how it is limited in
    some way. While this example shows a mixed evaluation, overall you
    are probably being more negative than positive.
    • In long reviews, you can address each criterion you choose in a
    paragraph, including both negative and positive points. For very short
    critical reviews (one page or less), where your comments will be
    briefer, include a paragraph of positive aspects and another of
    negative.
    • You can also include recommendations for how the text can be
    improved in terms of ideas, research approach; theories or
    frameworks used can also be included in the critique section.

    Conclusion & References

    Conclusion
    This is usually a very short paragraph.

    • Restate your overall opinion of the text.


    • Briefly present recommendations.
    • If necessary, some further qualification or explanation of your
    judgement can be included. This can help your critique sound fair
    and reasonable.

    References
    If you have used other sources in you review you should also include a list
    of references at the end of the review.

    Summarising and paraphrasing for the critical review


    Summarising and paraphrasing are essential skills for academic writing and
    in particular, the critical review. To summarise means to reduce a text to its
    main points and its most important ideas. The length of your summary for a
    critical review should only be about one quarter to one third of the whole
    critical review.

    The best way to summarise

    1. Scan the text. Look for information that can be deduced from the
    introduction, conclusion, title, and headings. What do these tell you
    about the main points of the article?
    2. Locate the topic sentences and highlight the main points as you read.

    2
    3. Reread the text and make separate notes of the main points.
    Examples and evidence do not need to be included at this stage.
    Usually they are used selectively in your critique.

    Paraphrasing means putting it into your own words. Paraphrasing offers an


    alternative to using direct quotations in your summary (and the critique) and
    can be an efficient way to integrate your summary notes.

    The best way to paraphrase

    1. Review your summary notes


    2. Rewrite them in your own words and in complete sentences
    3. Use reporting verbs and phrases, e.g. 'The author describes…',
    'Smith argues that …'.
    4. Use quotation marks if you include unique or specialist phrases from
    the text.

    3
    Some General Criteria for Evaluating Texts
    The following list of criteria and focus questions may be useful for reading
    the text and for preparing the critical review. Remember to check your
    assignment instructions for more specific criteria and focus questions that
    should form the basis of your review. The length of the review/assignment
    will determine how many criteria you will address in your critique.

    Criteria Possible focus questions


    Significance and contribution • What is the author's aim?
    to the field • To what extent has this aim been achieved?
    • What does this text add to the body of knowledge? This
    could be in terms of theory, data and/or practical
    application
    • What relationship does it bear to other works in the field?
    • What is missing/not stated?
    • Is this a problem?

    Methodology or approach (this • What approach was used for the research? For example,
    usually applies to more formal, quantitative or qualitative, analysis/review of theory or
    research-based texts) current practice, comparative, case study, personal
    reflection, etc..
    • How objective/biased is the approach?
    • Are the results valid and reliable?
    • What analytical framework is used to discuss the results?

    Argument and use of evidence • Is there a clear problem, statement or hypothesis?


    • What claims are made?
    • Is the argument consistent?
    • What kinds of evidence does the text rely on?
    • How valid and reliable is the evidence?
    • How effective is the evidence in supporting the
    argument?
    • What conclusions are drawn?
    • Are these conclusions justified?

    Writing style and text structure • Does the writing style suit the intended audience? For
    example, expert/non-expert, academic/non-academic, etc.
    • What is the organising principle of the text? Could it be
    better organised?

    You might also like