Previewpdf
Previewpdf
Previewpdf
Second edition
John Rowan
First published 1983
by Routledge
Preface x
Resonance 65
Genuineness 66
Warmth 66
Depth and surface 68
5 Aims 72
Background contrasts 72
The humanistic approach 73
Defences 75
The real self 76
Some questions answered 82
6 Ways and means 86
Sensing 86
Feeling 99
Thinking 107
Intuiting 112
Borderlines 115
7 Transference 118
Here and now 119
Interpretation 123
Responsibility 125
Countertransference 126
Projective identification 133
8 Resistance 135
Real self and Id 135
Types of resistance 138
Therapist response 140
9 The process of development 145
Primal integration 145
Mahrer’s humanistic psychodynamics 149
Wilber’s transpersonal theory 156
Conclusion 159
10 Listening with the fourth ear 161
Social awareness 161
Co-counselling 166
The patripsych 168
Implications 172
Some false trails 176
Contents ix
11 Research 179
A piece of history 180
Existing research 180
A new approach 183
New paradigm research 184
12 Supervision 192
Supervisor styles 193
The media of supervision 197
Humanistic education 202
13 Ethics 206
Private practice 206
Accreditation 209
Inward and outward 210
Criticisms 211
Boundaries 213
Telling the client 216
Appendix A
List of criteria for doing good therapy 217
Appendix B
Useful adresses 220
Bibliography 221
Name index 236
Subject index 00
Preface
This is a handbook for people who are, or who want to be, counsellors or
psychotherapists. It tries to cover both theory and practice, and will be
particularly useful to those who are in training to be humanistic or
integrative psychotherapists or counsellors. What are the differences
between this and the first edition? Every chapter has been thoroughly
revised, and there is one new chapter, on ethics. In the first edition, page
numbers for references were usually not given, as was quite normal in
those days. I have tried to add page numbers where I still had the books,
but some of them were too hard to track down, so there is some
inconsistency there. I have not tried to seek out the latest editions of
books quoted earlier, because there seemed no point. So in general I have
tried to bring the book up to date, but it is still the same book, and I have
not had to change it in any radical way.
It takes a humanistic stance. There are plenty of books for psycho-
analysts and plenty of books for behaviourists and their cognitive friends
- and there are plenty of highly-specialised books on specific approaches
in the humanistic field – but there is hardly anything for the general
humanistic practitioner, working on a one-to-one basis. In fact, when
I started to write this book, I thought there was nothing at all; but I
discovered later the book by Brammer, Shostrom and Abrego (1989)
which is very big and very American and very thorough (except that it
says very little about regression and very little about the transpersonal)
and makes an excellent complement to this present work.
Another and very important complement is that excellent book on
group work by Ernst and Goodison (1981), which makes it unnecessary
to have a chapter on groups in this present volume as was the original
intention. It covers all the approaches which I mention, and although it
claims to be addressed specifically to women, it is in fact equally
applicable to mixed groups - which is not surprising, because a great deal
Preface xi
That is a clear value for me and for all those I have worked with in the
organisations mentioned above.
One other thing: the word ‘humanistic’ is often misunderstood. Some
people misunderstand it by thinking it means that we are humanists, in
the sense of members of the British Humanist Association; this is far
from the truth, because we value spirituality and feeling and intuition in
a way which would offend the average humanist very much. Others
misunderstand it by thinking it means that we are soft and mushy and
want to spread peace and love all the time; but we are not in the peace
and love business, we are in the reality business. Or better still, since
there is always some element of play in good therapy, the reality game.
Chapter 1
Humanistic psychotherapy,
counselling and personal growth
mean that the splits in the person can be healed, and that the holes in the
personality can be filled. The various parts of the person can get to know
each other better, accept each other more, and change in that process.
This is not a process of subordinating all the various tendencies in the
person to one overall control, like some kind of totalitarian ego – it is
more like a harmony of contrasts. We shall have more to say on this
later.
The third thread we can follow all through the humanistic approach is
the emphasis on change and development. Human beings are seen not as
static victims or villains, but as people in a natural process of growth.
This process can continue, if we let it, in adulthood too. We have all seen
people we recognise as being further ahead than us, more complete,
more evolved, more themselves. What humanistic psychology says is
that we could all continue to grow if we did not limit ourselves and sell
ourselves short.
Most of us normally think that if we have enough worldly goods, then
we can do what we want to do, and then we can be happy. The sequence
is HAVE–DO–BE. But what we say in humanistic psychology is that it
is exactly the other way round. If we can be who we really are, we will
find ourselves doing things which genuinely satisfy us and give us
enjoyment, and then we shall have all we really want. The sequence for
us is BE–DO–HAVE.
ORIGINS
This begins to sound almost religious, and it is one of the characteristics
of humanistic psychology which distinguishes it very sharply from
secular humanism that it has a place for the spiritual. This is because its
origins are complex. Let us now look at some of the history, some of the
sources, of the humanistic approach. There are nine different origins of
humanistic psychology as it exists today.
do not like the word ‘unconscious’) can trip us up all the time. This lays
great stress on our responsibility for not taking for granted anything
about the ground on which we stand when we make any general
statement. We have to put everything in doubt, and assume that nothing
is absolutely true. This idea has been taken over by feminism and
constructivism and also by humanistic psychology.
Husserl took from Franz Brentano (1838–1917) the notion of inten-
tionality. This says that consciousness is always directed towards the real
world in order to interpret it in a meaningful manner. Consciousness is
always consciousness of some thing. So in humanistic psychology we
do not talk about behaviour, we talk about action. The difference is that
action is always intentional. Simon du Plock tells us that Husserl used
the word ‘intentionality’ to refer to the creativity in our acts, not a static
directedness (du Plock 1996: 42).
Gestalt therapy in particular, which is one of the central humanistic
disciplines, lays great stress on its phenomenological roots. ‘Phenom-
enology . . . is the philosophical approach which is at the very heart of
Gestalt’ (Clarkson 1989: 13).
The person-centred approach also leans heavily on phenomenology.
We only have to look at the use Carl Rogers makes of the phenomen-
ological notions of noema and noesis as ‘the primary means with
which to maintain unconditional positive regard’ (Spinelli 1990, p.19).
Du Plock again makes the point that Rogers found this set of concepts a
very useful one (du Plock 1996: 44).
Ronald Laing (1965) pointed to the close connection between phe-
nomenology and existentialism, and so did Merleau-Ponty (1908–61),
who said ‘The world is not what I think, but that which I live.’ This is
one of the most characteristic beliefs of humanistic psychology.
Phenomenology is one of the most important influences in the
new study of consciousness which is arousing so much interest in
philosophical circles. People like Shaun Gallagher (1997) and Francisco
Varela (1997) argue that we cannot understand the nature of con-
sciousness until we fully bring phenomenology into the argument.
Self-actualisation
This refers to the theory of Abraham Maslow (1908–70) that there is a
hierarchy of needs, ranging from lower needs like food and security up
to higher needs like self-esteem and self-actualisation. Ernesto Spinelli
(1989) has said that ‘The notion of authenticity bears striking similarity
to Maslow’s ideas concerning self-actualization.’ Self-actualisation is
all about being that self which I truly am, and the notion of the real self
8 Psychotherapy, counselling and growth
Abundance motivation
Most orthodox psychology is based on a homeostatic model (coping
model), which is deficiency-oriented. Action is thought of as initiated by
a need or want. Most organisms, however, seek tension-creating and
tension-maintaining situations, as well as tension reduction (Fiske and
Maddi 1961). Achievement motivation, need for varied experience,
curiosity and so forth can be comprehended under the concept of
abundance motivation. We do not just cope: at our best we can actively
seek experience for its own sake. Maslow called this Being motivation,
and wrote about it a good deal, particularly in his book Toward a
Psychology of Being.
Group dynamics
Coming from the early T-groups of Kurt Lewin (1890–1947), the idea
developed that authenticity could be cultivated by having a kind of group
where the leader forced the group to lead itself. This kind of paradoxical
approach was largely superseded by the encounter group, as developed
by Will Schutz (1989). But another huge input to this tradition was the
work of Jacob Moreno (1889–1974) who invented all the techniques of
psychodrama, and laid great stress on creativity and spontaneity. This
again is a discipline which is still being developed further (Holmes
et al. 1994). Moreno (1974) points out that his existential concept of
‘encounter’ (genuine I–Thou meeting) was later taken up by Carl Rogers
and Will Schutz and never lost its existentialist character. Schutz (1989a)
stole many ideas from Moreno, and others too, and created an integrative
type of group, which could do justice to the regressive, the existential
and the transpersonal – the open encounter group (Rowan 1992).
Peak experiences
Actual experience of mystical states of consciousness, usually spon-
taneous and unplanned, were labelled by Maslow (1970) ‘peak
experiences’. He advocated that they should be studied and cultivated. He
was a bit appalled, however, when in the 1960s people started having
such experiences as a result of taking hallucinogenic drugs, or by delib-
erately setting up group experiences for the purpose. Still, the evidence
does seem to be that it is possible to have a peak experience by using LSD,
and many thousands of people have done just that. Some scientific
evidence for the efficacy of psychedelic drugs in inducing genuinely
mystical experiences is given by Doblin (1991). Maslow said that self-
actualisation could be done without any transcendental experiences,
but that the higher type of self-actualisation always did include peak
experiences. In my view peak experiences represent the foothills of
mysticism proper, and make humanistic psychology inhabit a fascinating
borderline area, representing the end of the personal and the beginning of
the transpersonal. We shall be discussing this more later.
10 Psychotherapy, counselling and growth
Eastern philosophy
The four Eastern philosophies (which always include some psychology
as well) which have had the most influence on humanistic psychology
have been: Zen Buddhism, with its emphasis on letting go; Taoism,
particularly in its ideas of centring and the yin-yang polar unity of
opposites; Sufism, particularly with its emphasis on regaining one’s
naturalness and acquiring creative vision; and Tantra, particularly in its
emphasis on the importance of the body as a spiritual energy system.
(See Fadiman and Frager (1994) for a full discussion of Yoga, Zen and
Sufism. The chapter on Yoga also has an excellent flow chart showing
how to do meditation.)
doing, and what the client is up to now, and we try to tune in to body
language a great deal (Dreyfuss and Feinstein 1977). Many humanistic
practitioners touch the bodies of their clients, whether out of ordinary
human sympathy, encouragement to regress, provocative massage
designed to bring out feelings, re-enactment of birth, etc. So humanistic
practitioners have to be much more aware of their own bodies, and must
have worked through a great deal of such material themselves before
working with other people in this way (see Chapter 6).
Eighth, we are also different both from the other three schools in our
emphasis on good feelings. Most clients are just as incapable of feeling
deep joy as they are of contacting their deep pain. And so we look for
ecstasy as evidence of real change in the personality. Such an experience
is evidence that the person has started to emerge from the constraints
of their previous personal and social position. If the client has a peak
experience this is welcomed as being just the sort of thing we are aiming
at in the long run. For most clients, such experiences do not last long, but
as Anthony and his associates (1987) point out, they are glimpses of
what lies ahead in the process of psychospiritual development. This is
nothing to do with support or reassurance – it has to do with radical
change of the whole personality structure (see Chapter 5).
Now we come to some of the things we don’t do. Our ninth point is
that, unlike the other three schools, we do not adopt a medical model.
This idea of a medical model is all-pervasive in our Western culture, and
hard to get away from. It is a mechanistic view, holding that the client is
a kind of machine, which only has to be treated in the right way to get
invariable results. We think the client has choices, and that the object of
therapy is to increase the range of choices, and encourage and enable the
client to handle successfully this increased range of choices. And we
think the medical approach tends to reduce choice, even though this is
not what the medical practitioner intends. Wheelis (1972) has the basic
argument on this – that if you treat a person like a machine they lose
freedom (see Chapter 5). But even in medicine itself, there is nowadays
much more interest in holistic medicine – forms of medical practice
where the patient is seen as a whole human being who is responsible for
their own process. Perhaps the best discussion of this whole question is
to be found in the book by Ken Wilber and his wife, entitled Grace and
Grit (1991). This is much more so in psychotherapy and counselling,
which have always taken the view that the responsibility for change lies
with the client. We do not believe that there is a disease or illness, which
with suitable treatment will be cured (see Chapter 2). We believe rather
that the client needs to own up to what they are doing: that awareness in
14 Psychotherapy, counselling and growth
force’, and it clearly comes after the ‘third force’: in fact, the same man
– Anthony Sutich – who edited the Journal of Humanistic Psychology
later became the first editor of the Journal of Transpersonal Psychology.
It is not easy to produce a definition of transpersonal psychology, but the
most succinct version I have seen is that of Stan Grof where he says it
is concerned essentially with ‘experiences involving an expansion or
extension of consciousness beyond the usual ego boundaries and beyond
the limitation of time and/or space’ (1975: 155). In more recent years
we have found in Ken Wilber (1979, 1980) an excellent guide to this
area, and we shall follow his general approach here. He says that there
are three broad areas of human development – the physical, the mental
and the spiritual. And if we put them on a developmental line, they sit
like this:
HUMANISTIC
PSYCHOLOGY
BIOSOCIAL TRANSPERSONAL
BANDS BANDS
to get confused about our aims and what we can actually do effectually
and consistently. If Wilber is right, as I believe he is, we can see exactly
how we fit in with the whole field of therapy, counselling and growth
which we are trying to look at in this book.
THE FIELD
This area is a very confusing one, and it seems worthwhile to spend a
little time on getting clear about it as a whole, before getting into detail
about any one part of it.
The first term which is often bandied about is psychiatry. This is a
medical specialism, where doctors of medicine (actually usually bachelors
of medicine, but let that pass) have taken further qualifications in the field
of mental illness. The vast majority of psychiatrists in Britain prescribe
drugs, shock treatments and (to a much lesser extent) psychotherapy,
but they have no training in psychotherapy of any kind. Confusion has
arisen over this term, because in America the psychoanalysts were almost
always doctors, and therefore called themselves psychiatrists. American
films, therefore, show characters saying ‘I’ve just been to see my psy-
chiatrist’, when they have been to see a psychoanalyst in private practice
(in Britain most psychiatrists work for the National Health Service).
Hence the many references to ‘the psychiatrist’s couch’, which should
really be ‘the psychoanalyst’s couch’. But in Britain and many other
countries, many psychoanalysts are psychologists, or have other forms of
basic training, and so do not call themselves psychiatrists at all.
So the second term we should look at is psychoanalysis. This is of
course the approach developed by Sigmund Freud. There are some dis-
agreements as to whether certain followers of Freud are orthodox
enough to be called psychoanalysts, so the borderline is not altogether
easy to draw. There is also a distinction made between psychoanalysis
proper (lying down on the couch, five days a week) and psychoanalytically-
oriented psychotherapy (sitting on a chair, three, two or even one day a
week). This is sometimes called psychodynamic psychotherapy. This is
a fair distinction, but at the same time all of these things are usually
included under the general heading of psychotherapy.
Psychotherapy is any approach to mental distress which involves
encouraging the distressed person to uncover and face their problems,
and work through them in constructive ways. Usually this involves
mainly talking, but it may involve body work as well. Psychotherapy
may be of just one school, in which case it makes sense to say that the
therapist is ‘a Gestaltist’ or ‘a bioenergeticist’, etc.; or it may be eclectic
18 Psychotherapy, counselling and growth
Belson, W. (1975) Juvenile Theft: The Causal Factors, New York: Harper &
Row.
Bem, Daryl J. (1970) Beliefs, Attitudes and Human Affairs, Belmont, CA:
Brooks/Cole.
Benson, L. (1974) Images, Heroes and Self-perception: The Struggle for
Identity – from Mask-wearing to Authenticity, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.:
Prentice-Hall.
Berke, J. H. (1979) I Haven’t Had to Go Mad Here, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Berman, Jeffrey S. and Norton, Nicholas C. (1985) ‘Does professional training
make a therapist more effective?’, Psychological Bulletin, 94/2.
Berne, E. (1973) What Do You Say After You Say Hello?, New York: Bantam.
Berry, Scott (1996) ‘Learning to live with life-threatening illness’ in S. Palmer,
S. Dainow and P. Milner (eds) Counselling: The BAC Counselling Reader,
London: Sage.
Boadella, David (1988) Biosynthesis, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Bond, Tim (1996) ‘Counselling-supervision – Ethical issues’ in S. Palmer,
S. Dainow and P. Milner (eds) Counselling: The BAC Counselling Reader,
London: Sage.
Boorstein, Seymour (ed.) (1996) Transpersonal Psychotherapy, 2nd edn,
Albany: State University of New York Press.
Boyesen, G. (1970) ‘Experiences with dynamic relaxation’, Energy &
Character, 1/1.
Boyle, Mary (1990) Schizophrenia: A Scientific Delusion?, London: Fontana.
Boyle, Mary (1996) ‘Schizophrenia: The Fallacy of Diagnosis’, Changes, 14/1
pp. 5–13.
Brammer, Lawrence M., Shostrom, Everett L. and Abrego, Philip J. (1989)
Therapeutic Psychology: Fundamentals of Counseling and Psychotherapy,
5th edn, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
Brazier, David (1991) A Guide to Psychodrama, London: Association for
Humanistic Psychology in Britain.
Brenner, C. (1979) ‘Working alliance, therapeutic alliance and transference’,
Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, (supplement), 27.
Broughton, J. (1975) ‘The development of natural epistemology in adolescence
and early adulthood’, Harvard, MA: unpublished doctoral dissertation.
Brown, Juliana and Mowbray, Richard (1990) ‘Whither the human potential
movement’, Self & Society, 18/4 pp. 32–5.
Brown, Juliana and Mowbray, Richard (1994) ‘Primal Integration’ in D. Jones
(ed.) Innovative Therapy: A Handbook, Buckingham: Open University Press.
Brown, P. (1974) Toward a Marxist Psychology, New York: Harper Colophon.
Buber, M. (1961) Tales of the Hasidim: The Early Masters, New York:
Schocken.
Buber, M. (1965) ‘Dialogue between Martin Buber and Carl Rogers’, in M.
Friedman (ed.) Man and the Knowledge of Man, New York: Harper & Row.
Bugental, J. F. T. (1976) The Search for Existential Identity, San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Bugental, J. F. T. (1978) Psychotherapy and Process: The Fundamentals of an
Existential-humanistic Approach, Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Bugental, J. F. T. (1981) The Search for Authenticity, enlarged edn, New York:
Irvington.
Bibliography 223